4 results
38 Assessing Memory for Emotions Separately from Emotion Recognition
- Gavin Sanders, Lisa J. Rapport, Robiann Broomfield, Sarah D. Patrick, Emily Flores, Robin A. Hanks, Mark A. Lumley, Scott A. Langenecker, Lauren J. Radigan
-
- Journal:
- Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society / Volume 29 / Issue s1 / November 2023
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 21 December 2023, pp. 826-827
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Export citation
-
Objective:
Accurate processing of facial displays of emotion is critical for effective communication. A robust literature has documented impairment in the ability to recognize facial affect in people with traumatic brain injury (TBI), but research is scarce about memory for facial affect. Disruptions in recognizing and remembering the emotions of others can undermine relationship quality and may result in psychosocial dysfunction. Importantly, the extant literature indicates that facial affect recognition dissociates from other cognitive abilities such that it is likely a distinct neuronal process. Thus, explicit measurement of affect recognition and memory for emotions may be critical for implementing and refining rehabilitation interventions. The present study examined the relationship between recognition and memory for emotions using a novel computerized task and explored its associations with other cognitive abilities.
Participants and Methods:Participants were adults who were neurologically healthy (n = 31) or had a history of moderate to severe TBI (n = 26). The battery included the novel Assessment of Facial Affect Recognition and Memory (AFARM), Cambridge Face Memory Test (face memory without emotion), Wechsler Test of Adult Reading, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, Judgment of Line Orientation, Oral Symbol Digit Modalities, Digit Span, FAS, Animal Fluency, and the Affect Intensity Measure (experienced emotion). Spearman correlations examined the relationship of AFARM performance with the test battery. Logistic regression models examined whether immediate-delay (ID-EM) and long-delay face emotion-memory (LD-EM) accounted for unique variance in group membership beyond recognition accuracy of facial affect and memory for faces.
Results:AFARM demonstrated relationships with neuropsychological and mood variables in the expected directions across and within groups, with the strongest associations observed for memory for verbal information (rs = .51 to .58) and processing speed (rs = .48 to .57). Consistent with traditional list-learning tests, ID- and LD-EM were highly correlated (r = .85). Experienced affect intensity was inversely associated with ID-EM (r = -.29) and LD-EM (r = -.38) but not with recognition accuracy (r = -.10). Logistic regression examining ID-EM was significant, χ2(3) = 26.05, p < .001, Nagelkerke R2 = .49. ID-EM accounted for unique variance in group status (p = .006; OR = 0.65) after accounting for recognition accuracy and face memory. Similarly, the model examining LD-EM was significant χ2(3) = 27.70, p < .001, Nagelkerke R2 = .43; LD-EM was significant after accounting for other variables (p = .017; OR = 0.69).
Conclusions:The findings are consistent with the hypothesis that memory for emotions represents a unique component of social cognition that is separate from recognition. Accuracy in identifying emotions, face recognition memory, and memory for emotions are strongly related but not wholly redundant processes. Consistent with prior literature, subjective experience of emotion had substantial effects on objective performance tasks, indicating that an individual's intense experience of their own emotions can disrupt sensitivity to the emotions of others. Future research should assess the extent to which memory for emotions relates to psychosocial outcomes such as the quality and quantity of interpersonal relationships.
Corner store purchases made by adults, adolescents and children: items, nutritional characteristics and amount spent
- Michelle R Lent, Stephanie Vander Veur, Giridhar Mallya, Tara A McCoy, Timothy A Sanders, Lisa Colby, Colleen Rauchut Tewksbury, Hannah G Lawman, Brianna Sandoval, Sandy Sherman, Judith Wylie-Rosett, Gary D Foster
-
- Journal:
- Public Health Nutrition / Volume 18 / Issue 9 / June 2015
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 13 August 2014, pp. 1706-1712
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- HTML
- Export citation
-
Objective
Corner stores, also known as bodegas, are prevalent in low-income urban areas and primarily stock high-energy foods and beverages. Little is known about individual-level purchases in these locations. The purpose of the present study was to assess corner store purchases (items, nutritional characteristics and amount spent) made by children, adolescents and adults in a low-income urban environment.
DesignEvaluation staff used 9238 intercept surveys to directly examine food and beverage purchases.
SettingIntercepts were collected at 192 corner stores in Philadelphia, PA, USA.
SubjectsParticipants were adult, adolescent and child corner store shoppers.
ResultsAmong the 9238 intercept surveys, there were 20 244 items. On average, at each corner store visit, consumers purchased 2·2 (sd 2·1) items (1·3 (sd 2·0) foods and 0·9 (sd 0·9) beverages) that cost $US 2·74 (sd $US 3·52) and contained 2786·5 (sd 4454·2) kJ (666·0 (sd 1064·6) kcal). Whether the data were examined as a percentage of total items purchased or as a percentage of intercepts, the most common corner store purchases were beverages, chips, prepared food items, pastries and candy. Beverage purchases occurred during 65·9 % of intercepts and accounted for 39·2 % of all items. Regular soda was the most popular beverage purchase. Corner store purchases averaged 66·2 g of sugar, 921·1 mg of sodium and 2·5 g of fibre per intercept. Compared with children and adolescents, adults spent the most money and purchased the most energy.
ConclusionsUrban corner store shoppers spent almost $US 3·00 for over 2700 kJ (650 kcal) per store visit. Obesity prevention efforts may benefit from including interventions aimed at changing corner store food environments in low-income, urban areas.
Contributors
-
- By Ioannis P. Androulakis, Djillali Annane, Gérard Audibert, Lisa L. Barnes, Paolo Bartolomeo, Walter S. Bartynski, David A. Bennett, Nicolas Bruder, Nathan E. Brummel, Steve E. Calvano, Alain Cariou, F. Chretien, Jan Claassen, Colm Cunningham, Souhayl Dahmani, Robert Dantzer, Dimitry S. Davydow, Sanjay V. Desai, E. Wesley Ely, Frédéric Faugeras, Karen J. Ferguson, Brandon Foreman, Sadanand M. Gaikwad, Rebecca F. Gottesman, Maura A. Grega, Richard D. Griffiths, Marion Griton, Stefan D. Gurney, Hebah M. Hefzy, Michael T. Heneka, Dustin M. Hipp, Ramona O. Hopkins, Christopher G. Hughes, James C. Jackson, Christina Jones, Peter W. Kaplan, Keith W. Kelley, Raymond C. Koehler, Matthew A. Koenig, Jan Pieter Konsman, Felix Kork, John P. Kress, Stephen F. Lowry, Alawi Luetz, David Luis, Alasdair M. J. MacLullich, Guy M. McKhann, Jean Mantz, Panteleimon D. Mavroudis, Mervyn Maze, Bruno Mégarbane, Lionel Naccache, Dale M. Needham, Pratik P. Pandharipande, Jean-Francois Payen, V. Hugh Perry, Margaret Pisani, C. Rauturier, Benjamin Rohaut, Jennifer Ryan, Robert D. Sanders, Jeremy D. Scheff, Frederic Sedel, Ola A. Selnes, Tarek Sharshar, Martin Siegemund, Yoanna Skrobik, Jamie W. Sleigh, Romain Sonneville, Claudia D. Spies, Luzius A. Steiner, Robert D. Stevens, Raoul Sutter, Fabio Silvio Taccone, Richard E. Temes, Willem A. van Gool, Christel C. Vanbesien, F. Verdonk, Odile Viltart, Julia Wendon, Catherine N. Widmann, Robert S. Wilson
- Edited by Robert D. Stevens, Tarek Sharshar, E. Wesley Ely, Vanderbilt University, Tennessee
-
- Book:
- Brain Disorders in Critical Illness
- Published online:
- 05 October 2013
- Print publication:
- 19 September 2013, pp viii-xii
-
- Chapter
- Export citation
5 - Varying degrees of plasticity in different subsystems within language
-
- By Lisa D. Sanders, Department of Psychology University of Massachusetts at Amherst Tobin Hall, 135 Hicks Way Amherst, MA 01003, Christine M. Weber-Fox, Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences Purdue University West Lafayette, IN 47907, Helen J. Neville, Director Brain Development Lab; Professor Psychology and Neuroscience University of Oregon Eugene, Oregon 97403-1227
- Edited by James R. Pomerantz, Rice University, Houston
-
- Book:
- Topics in Integrative Neuroscience
- Published online:
- 08 August 2009
- Print publication:
- 21 February 2008, pp 125-153
-
- Chapter
- Export citation
-
Summary
There are periods in development during which experience plays its largest role in shaping the eventual structure and function of mature language-processing systems. These spans of peak cortical plasticity have been called “sensitive periods.” Here, we describe a series of studies investigating the effects of delays in second language (L2) acquisition on different subsystems within language. First, we review the effects of the altered language experience of congenitally deaf subjects on cerebral systems important for processing written English and American Sign Language (ASL). Second, we present behavioral and electrophysiological studies of L2 semantic and syntactic processing in Chinese-English bilinguals who acquired their second language over a wide range of ages. Third, we review semantic, syntactic, and prosodic processing in native Spanish and native Japanese late-learners of English. These approaches have provided converging evidence, indicating that delays in language acquisition have minimal effects on some aspects of semantic processing. In contrast, delays of even a few years result in deficits in some types of syntactic processing and differences in the organization of cortical systems used to process syntactic information. The different subsystems of language which rely on different cortical areas, including semantic, syntactic, phonological, and prosodic processing, may have different developmental time courses that in part determine the different sensitive period effects observed.
Humans, in comparison to other animals, go through a protracted period of post-natal development that lasts at least 15 years (Chugani & Phelps, 1986; Huttenlocher, 1990).