3 results
Agricultural Research Service Weed Science Research: Past, Present, and Future
- Stephen L. Young, James V. Anderson, Scott R. Baerson, Joanna Bajsa-Hirschel, Dana M. Blumenthal, Chad S. Boyd, Clyde D. Boyette, Eric B. Brennan, Charles L. Cantrell, Wun S. Chao, Joanne C. Chee-Sanford, Charlie D. Clements, F. Allen Dray, Stephen O. Duke, Kayla M. Eason, Reginald S. Fletcher, Michael R. Fulcher, John F. Gaskin, Brenda J. Grewell, Erik P. Hamerlynck, Robert E. Hoagland, David P. Horvath, Eugene P. Law, John D. Madsen, Daniel E. Martin, Clint Mattox, Steven B. Mirsky, William T. Molin, Patrick J. Moran, Rebecca C. Mueller, Vijay K. Nandula, Beth A. Newingham, Zhiqiang Pan, Lauren M. Porensky, Paul D. Pratt, Andrew J. Price, Brian G. Rector, Krishna N. Reddy, Roger L. Sheley, Lincoln Smith, Melissa C. Smith, Keirith A. Snyder, Matthew A. Tancos, Natalie M. West, Gregory S. Wheeler, Martin M. Williams, Julie Wolf, Carissa L. Wonkka, Alice A. Wright, Jing Xi, Lew H. Ziska
-
- Journal:
- Weed Science / Volume 71 / Issue 4 / July 2023
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 16 August 2023, pp. 312-327
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Open access
- HTML
- Export citation
-
The U.S. Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS) has been a leader in weed science research covering topics ranging from the development and use of integrated weed management (IWM) tactics to basic mechanistic studies, including biotic resistance of desirable plant communities and herbicide resistance. ARS weed scientists have worked in agricultural and natural ecosystems, including agronomic and horticultural crops, pastures, forests, wild lands, aquatic habitats, wetlands, and riparian areas. Through strong partnerships with academia, state agencies, private industry, and numerous federal programs, ARS weed scientists have made contributions to discoveries in the newest fields of robotics and genetics, as well as the traditional and fundamental subjects of weed–crop competition and physiology and integration of weed control tactics and practices. Weed science at ARS is often overshadowed by other research topics; thus, few are aware of the long history of ARS weed science and its important contributions. This review is the result of a symposium held at the Weed Science Society of America’s 62nd Annual Meeting in 2022 that included 10 separate presentations in a virtual Weed Science Webinar Series. The overarching themes of management tactics (IWM, biological control, and automation), basic mechanisms (competition, invasive plant genetics, and herbicide resistance), and ecosystem impacts (invasive plant spread, climate change, conservation, and restoration) represent core ARS weed science research that is dynamic and efficacious and has been a significant component of the agency’s national and international efforts. This review highlights current studies and future directions that exemplify the science and collaborative relationships both within and outside ARS. Given the constraints of weeds and invasive plants on all aspects of food, feed, and fiber systems, there is an acknowledged need to face new challenges, including agriculture and natural resources sustainability, economic resilience and reliability, and societal health and well-being.
11 - Dothard v. Rawlinson, 433 U.S. 321 (1977)
- from Part II - The feminist judgments
-
- By Brenda V. Smith, Professor of Law and Director of the Project on Addressing Prison Rape at American University., Maria L. Ontiveros, Professor of Law and co-director of the labor and employment law program at University of San Francisco School of Law.
- Edited by Kathryn M. Stanchi, Linda L. Berger, Bridget J. Crawford
-
- Book:
- Feminist Judgments
- Published online:
- 05 August 2016
- Print publication:
- 02 August 2016, pp 208-227
-
- Chapter
- Export citation
-
Summary
INTRODUCTION
Dothard v. Rawlinson is among the most important early cases applying Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to gender. It was the first case that considered whether a seemingly neutral job requirement like height and weight could violate Title VII if it had a disparate impact on women in the workplace. It was also the first case to address Title VII's bona fide occupational qualification (“BFOQ”), which allows employers to use sex in employment decisions if it is “reasonabl[y] necessary … to the normal operation of that business or enterprise.”
Dothard involved employment in Alabama's state correctional facilities. The female plaintiffs in Dothard argued that the prison's height and weight requirements created a disparate impact by excluding 41 percent of women and only 1 percent of men. They also challenged the prison's categorical exclusion of women from contact positions, arguing that maleness was not a BFOQ for employment in Alabama's male prisons.
The U.S. Supreme Court found that Alabama's height and weight requirements violated Title VII because the state offered no evidence that the requirements were necessary to the job. The Court found, however, that sex was a BFOQ permitting Alabama to exclude women from contact positions in its maximum-security prisons. Acknowledging that its reasoning echoed the “romantic paternalism” that it explicitly forbade in Frontiero v. Richardson, the Court nonetheless balked at permitting women to act as prison guards. Describing the men's maximum security prison as a “jungle atmosphere,” the Court reasoned that female staff's “very womanhood” would undermine security in the prison and might incite sexual assault by prisoners “deprived of a normal heterosexual environment.”
The feminist judgment by Professor Maria Ontiveros, writing as Justice Ontiveros, challenges the legal and logical underpinnings of the Court's opinion. She criticizes the Court's disparate impact analysis for not providing adequate guidance when a challenged job requirement, like height and weight, is a proxy for sex. She is even more critical of the Court's BFOQ analysis, finding that it enshrines sexist stereotypes of women as the cause of sexual assault, permits de facto sex segregation in the workplace, and limits the self-determination of female workers. Ontiveros's opinion illuminates the sexism that is codified in Title VII's BFOQ and reified in U.S.
List of contributors
-
- By Nazia M. Alam, Enrico Alleva, Hiroyuki Arakawa, Robert H. Benno, Fred G. Biddle, D. Caroline Blanchard, Robert J. Blanchard, Richard J. Bodnar, John D. Boughter, Igor Branchi, Richard E. Brown, Abel Bult-Ito, Jonathan M. Cachat, Peter R. Canavello, Francesca Cirulli, Giovanni Colacicco, John C. Crabbe, Jacqueline N. Crawley, Wim E. Crusio, Sietse F. de Boer, Ekrem Dere, Brenda A. Eales, Robert T. Gerlai, Howard K. Gershenfeld, Thomas J. Gould, Martin E. Hahn, Peter C. Hart, Andrew Holmes, Joseph P. Huston, Allan V. Kalueff, Benjamin Kest, Robert Lalonde, Sarah R. Lewis-Levy, Hans-Peter Lipp, Sheree F. Logue, Stephen C. Maxson, Jeffrey S. Mogil, Douglas A. Monks, Dennis L. Murphy, Lee Niel, Timothy P. O’Leary, Susanna Pietropaolo, Peter K.D. Pilz, Claudia F. Plappert, Bernard Possidente, Glen T. Prusky, Laura Ricceri, Heather Schellinck, Herbert Schwegler, Burton Slotnick, Frans Sluyter, Shad B. Smith, Catherine Strazielle, Douglas Wahlsten, Hans Welzl, James F. Willott, David P. Wolfer, Armin Zlomuzica
- Edited by Wim E. Crusio, Université de Bordeaux, Frans Sluyter, Robert T. Gerlai, University of Toronto, Susanna Pietropaolo, Université de Bordeaux
-
- Book:
- Behavioral Genetics of the Mouse
- Published online:
- 05 May 2013
- Print publication:
- 25 April 2013, pp ix-xii
-
- Chapter
- Export citation