To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Recent developments in widefield radio telescopes have enabled searches of a new region of parameter space in the time domain: timescales of seconds to minutes, that have been overlooked in traditional surveys. These searches have revealed a new population of sources: long period transients, which typically show periodic behaviour of minutes to hours. In addition they have detected phenomena ranging from extreme scintillation to stellar radio bursts. However, almost all searches to date have involved archival data that has been processed in offline, batch mode. In this context, we present VASTER, the first short-timescale imaging and transient detection pipeline running in real time on a widefield radio telescope. VASTER has been running on the Australian SKA Pathfinder (ASKAP) since July 2025, and images most of the ASKAP survey project data on timescales of 15 min. In this paper we describe the VASTER system, and present the results from the first two weeks of operation, including the discovery of two long period transients: ASKAP J165130.3$-$450520 with a period of 6.48 h and ASKAP J170036.6$-$445758 with a period of 4.69 h. The detection of these two sources adds to the small, but growing, population of long period transients, as well as demonstrating the potential of VASTER to explore this region of transient parameter space.
Evaluating the effectiveness of intra-operative nerve monitoring and stimulation in preventing spinal accessory nerve and marginal mandibular nerve injuries during neck dissection.
Methods
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Review methodology was used to map and summarise current literature. Online PubMed/MEDLINE searches and manual screening identified relevant studies for inclusion.
Results
Seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Six addressed the spinal accessory nerve and one the marginal mandibular nerve. No randomised controlled trials were identified. The evidence tentatively supports the use of intra-operative neurophysiological monitoring in reducing spinal accessory nerve and marginal mandibular nerve palsy rates during neck dissection. Intra-operative neurophysiological monitoring modalities varied across studies, from continuous neuromonitoring to handheld nerve stimulation and nerve mapping. Monitoring criteria and outcome definitions differed across studies.
Conclusions
The evidence base for intra-operative neurophysiological monitoring of standard accessory nerve and marginal mandibular nerve during neck dissection remains methodologically heterogeneous. Standardised protocols, prospective controlled studies and dedicated marginal mandibular nerve monitoring studies are required before routine implementation can be recommended.
Confucian Constitutionalism can be seen as aiming to translate constitutional democracy into the vernacular cultural language of East Asia: “Confucian democratic constitutionalism invites them to reformulate their constitutional identity and public morality in mediation of Confucian civic culture that is still in play in their social, legal, and political lives but for the institutional expression of which they lack an adequate language” (204). The importance of this task is twofold. The first is that the relatively young democracies of East Asia are frequently characterized by an “incongruence between the formal liberal constitutional order and the Confucian civic culture that continues to inform people’s moral reasoning and judgment” (203–4) and yet, as Jürgen Habermas puts it, constitutional rights must be “enduringly linked with the motivations and convictions of the citizens, for without such a motivational anchoring they could not become the driving force behind the dynamically conceived project of producing an association of free and equal individuals.”1 The second reason this matters is that a significant strand of Confucian political theory—so-called “meritocratic” theories—offers a competing ideal which is not democratic in character. To the extent that these vernacular political theories can get a grip on East Asian societies, they are liable to increase the dissonance between the formal institutional order and the background civic culture in democratic states and weaken the forces of democratization in authoritarian states. Hence Kim aims to provide both the conceptual resources for, and an attractive ideal of, Confucian democratic constitutionalism as well as a critical perspective on Confucian political meritocracy.
Soil porewater chemistry underpins the quantification of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) in enhanced rock weathering (ERW), where alkalinity and dissolved ion measurements are used within monitoring, reporting and verification (MRV) frameworks. The reliability of these measurements depends on the extraction method, with many in-field techniques constrained by soil moisture availability. This dependence can limit data continuity, reduce comparability across sites and seasons and introduce uncertainty into CDR-relevant interpretations. Here, we present and evaluate a new soil porewater extraction method, SATuration–Centrifugation (SAT-C), designed to obtain porewater from a defined soil volume independent of moisture conditions. The method combines saturation of intact soil cores using deionized water with centrifugation to recover porewater for chemical analysis. We compare SAT-C with conventional sampling using soils collected from grassland field sites, including sites amended with crushed basalt as part of ERW field trials. Across sites, SAT-C porewater chemistry shows strong agreement with rhizon samples for major ions, and bicarbonate concentrations inferred from charge balance are consistent with measured alkalinity. These initial results show that SAT-C provides a robust and reproducible approach for soil porewater extraction, with the potential to improve sampling reliability across variable conditions and thereby support more reliable carbon accounting in ERW.
David Owen opens his response by observing that, for Rainer Forst, the first question of justice is the question of power. In any scheme of rule, what matters is that those subject to power are able to contest and shape the relations of rule by demanding justifications. Moving on to Forst's concept of morality, Owen observes that this is rooted in a Wittgenstenian 'seeing' of other human beings as human. He agrees with Forst about this fundamental form of moral recognition, but charges Forst with making it appear that seeing another biological human being as human means seeing all other biological human beings as human. Owen also argues that, contrary to what Forst suggests, overcoming soulblindness is not a matter of being provided with additional facts or normative reasons but of 'soul-dawning', of coming to see an aspect that one could not see before. The basis of Forst's error here is his treatment of the power exerted by structures (such as patriarchy) that configure the general space of reasons. In separating this area from his broader discussion of power, Forst embraces a narrower definition in which justificatory reasons are the normative medium though which power is exercised. Owen ends his response by reflecting on Bernard Williams's distinction between justification and vindication, and whether Forst's account is capable of explaining how far political violence may be used in the pursuit of establishing the right to justification.
Jeremy Corbyn has shown that he has an appeal to many authentic and interested in extending democracy outside Westminster. In the EU referendum the London Labour Party was against immigration controls, including Corbyn, whereas politicians like Rachel Reeves afterwards warned the Labour Conference in September 2016 that her Leeds West constituency was a 'tinderbox' on this issue. There will be no movement of significance in the Labour Party towards any progressive alliance until the next election, whether a federal UK, proportional representation or seat deals in particular constituencies. Labour's unease had been the UK since the Common Market debate in 1962 but with a waxing and waning of enthusiasm for the idea of European unity. The Pew Research Centre in June 2016, coinciding with Brexit, showed that in Germany and the Netherlands disapproval of the EU was as high as in Britain and even higher in France, Spain and Greece.
James Tully's own work from An approach to political philosophy (1993) to Strange multiplicity (1995) to, most recently, the two volumes of Public philosophy in a new key (2008 and 2009) offers us both a reading of Michael Foucault that makes perspicuous his contribution to contemporary debates concerning recognition and an original elaboration and extension of that contribution. The author's concern in this chapter is, consequently, two-fold: to consider Tully's relationship to Foucault and to show how Tully's use of Foucault within his own work provides a distinctive approach to questions of recognition. The author takes up this task attending to two aspects of Tully's use of Foucault, first, as a critical mode of historical philosophy for approaching the topic of recognition and, second, as a basis for an agonistic account of struggles over recognition.
This paper considers the implications of COVID for open borders. It notes that while COVID concerns do not directly challenge arguments for open borders, the pandemic has revealed two more general phenomena that are salient for such arguments. The first concerns the increasing unmooring of legal borders from physical spaces and the interaction of surveillance and identification technologies with this process. The second addresses the issue of interdependency and the potentially negative implications of open borders if not underpinned by a global basic structure.
Ancient Greek terminology continues to shape contemporary discourse; hubris is a case in point. Typically seen as the catastrophic yet common tendency to reach too high, only to fall, it remains a fixture in the contemporary discourse of business and politics. But hubris has also become a term of art for researchers in a number of academic disciplines; and it remains a hotly contested topic in Classics. This unique volume of essays explores the connections, continuities and differences between ancient hubris and its modern counterparts. Its distinguished multidisciplinary cast of experts in Classics, Business and Management Studies and Psychology explores what modern researchers can learn from the theorisation and deployment of hubris in ancient sources and how modern approaches to hubris can help us understand the ancient concept.