We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
This chapter reviews several traditions of research and theory on gender differences in interpersonal accuracy. Females excel over males in inferring the meanings of affective cues as judged in multiple cue modalities. This difference holds across time, cultures, age groups, and target gender. Females also have greater ability in judging personality, though fewer studies are available. They also excel in remembering others’ appearance and nonverbal behavior, they respond more quickly on accuracy tasks, and they have more extensive knowledge of the meanings and usages of nonverbal communication as assessed on a written test. However, little difference in judgment accuracy is seen for lie detection and the judgment of status/dominance, and for the judgment of physical pain there is evidence that males excel over females. Accuracy in other domains is also discussed, including the recognition of flirtation and romantic interest. Finally, the chapter reviews the main theoretical frameworks within which accuracy gender differences have been discussed.
There is a large accumulation of research on gender differences in nonverbal communication. By nonverbal communication we mean specific behaviors such as smiling or gazing, as well as accuracy in nonverbal communication. Summaries of these gender differences are available (Hall, 1978, 1984, 1987; LaFrance & Hecht, this volume; Vrugt & Kerkstra, 1984). The present chapter is also concerned with gender and nonverbal communication, but differs from earlier treatments in that we discuss a selected group of nonverbal behaviors with specific interest in analyzing the role of emotion in understanding the gender differences.
Before beginning, it is important to make several points. First, nonverbal behavior does not necessarily signify emotion. Some examples will easily make this point. Smiles can serve the function of “listener responses” that signal comprehension and cue the other person to keep speaking (Brunner, 1979). Gaze is used to help coordinate the intricate process of turn-taking in conversation (Cappella, 1985). Hand movements aid in the process of speech encoding (Krauss, Chen, & Chawla, 1996). These are but a few examples of non-emotional meanings and functions of nonverbal cues.
Second, even when nonverbal cues do indicate emotion, it is often difficult to identify what emotion is being felt. Nonverbal cues do not have fixed, dictionary-like meanings. So, a smile might convey either joy or anxiety, looking at someone might signify hostility or fascination, and so forth. Although someday we might understand the relations among contextual factors, motivational states, and specific muscle configurations well enough to permit a confident identification of which particular emotions are being conveyed by which nonverbal behaviors, in our present state of knowledge we are often unable to do so.
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.