Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-rkzlw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-07T14:11:10.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Gender differences in interpersonal accuracy

from Part II - Correlates of interpersonal accuracy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2016

By
Judith A. Hall ,
Sarah D. Gunnery  and
Terrence G. Horgan
Edited by
Judith A. Hall ,
Marianne Schmid Mast  and
Tessa V. West
Judith A. Hall
Affiliation:
Northeastern University, Boston
Marianne Schmid Mast
Affiliation:
Université de Lausanne, Switzerland
Tessa V. West
Affiliation:
New York University
Get access

Summary

Abstract

This chapter reviews several traditions of research and theory on gender differences in interpersonal accuracy. Females excel over males in inferring the meanings of affective cues as judged in multiple cue modalities. This difference holds across time, cultures, age groups, and target gender. Females also have greater ability in judging personality, though fewer studies are available. They also excel in remembering others’ appearance and nonverbal behavior, they respond more quickly on accuracy tasks, and they have more extensive knowledge of the meanings and usages of nonverbal communication as assessed on a written test. However, little difference in judgment accuracy is seen for lie detection and the judgment of status/dominance, and for the judgment of physical pain there is evidence that males excel over females. Accuracy in other domains is also discussed, including the recognition of flirtation and romantic interest. Finally, the chapter reviews the main theoretical frameworks within which accuracy gender differences have been discussed.

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
The Social Psychology of Perceiving Others Accurately , pp. 309 - 327
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aamodt, M. G., & Custer, H. (2006). Who can best catch a liar? Forensic Examiner, 15, 6–11.Google Scholar
Abbey, A. (1982). Sex differences in attributions for friendly behavior: Do males misperceive females’ friendliness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 830–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambady, N., Hallahan, M., & Conner, B. (1999). Accuracy of judgments of sexual orientation from thin slices of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 538.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ambady, N., Hallahan, M., & Rosenthal, R. (1995). On judging and being judged accurately in zero-acquaintance situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 518–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, P. A. (2006). The evolution of biological sex differences in communication. In Dindia, K. & Canary, D. J. (Eds.), Sex differences and similarities in communication (2nd ed., pp. 117–135). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001). The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 241–251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borkenau, P., & Liebler, A. (1995). Observable attributes as manifestations and cues of personality and intelligence. Journal of Personality, 63, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briton, N. J., & Hall, J. A. (1995). Beliefs about female and male nonverbal communication. Sex Roles, 32, 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzby, D. E. (1924). The interpretation of facial expression. American Journal of Psychology, 35, 602–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carney, D. R., Colvin, C. R., & Hall, J. A. (2007). A thin slice perspective on the accuracy of first impressions. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 1054–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, M., Rogers, K. H., Parisotto, K. L., & Biesanz, J. C. (2011). Forming first impressions: The role of gender and normative accuracy in personality perception. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 117–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Costanzo, M., & Archer, D. (1989). Interpreting the expressive behavior of others: The Interpersonal Perception Task. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 13, 225–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, S. E., & Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 5–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davitz, J. R., Beldoch, M., Blau, S., Dimitrovsky, L., Levitt, E., Kempner Levy, P., Mattis, S., & Turner, J. Le B. (1964). Personality, perceptual, and cognitive correlates of emotional sensitivity. In Davitz, J. R. (Ed.), The communication of emotional meaning (pp. 57–68). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Driscoll, D. M., Kelly, J. R., & Henderson, W. L. (1998). Can perceivers identify likelihood to sexually harass? Sex Roles, 38, 557–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekman, P., Sorenson, E. R., & Friesen, W. V. (1969). Pan-cultural elements in facial displays of emotion. Science, 164, 86–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farris, C., Treat, T. A., Viken, R. J., & McFall, R. M. (2008). Sexual coercion and the misperception of sexual intent. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 48–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feinberg, R. A., Mataro, L., & Burroughs, W. J. (1992). Clothing and social identity. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 11, 18–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funder, D. C. (1995). On the accuracy of personality judgment: A realistic approach. Psychological Review, 102, 652–670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, J. A. (1978). Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cues. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 845–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, J. A. (1983). Nonverbal sex differences: Communication accuracy and expressive style. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, J. A. (2006). How big are nonverbal sex differences? The case of smiling and sensitivity to nonverbal cues. In Dindia, K. and Canary, D. J. (Eds.), Sex differences and similarities in communication (2nd ed., pp. 59–81). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Hall, J. A., Andrzejewski, S. A., & Yopchick, J. E. (2009). Psychosocial correlates of interpersonal sensitivity: A meta-analysis. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 33, 149–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, J. A., Blanch, D. C., Horgan, T. G., Murphy, N. A., Rosip, J. C., & Schmid Mast, M. (2009). Motivation and interpersonal sensitivity: Does it matter how hard you try? Motivation and Emotion, 33, 291–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, J. A., Goh, J. X., & Schmid Mast, M., & Hagedorn, C. (in press). Individual differences in accuracy of assessing personality from text. Journal of Personality. Hall, J. A., Halberstadt, A. G., & O’Brien, C. E. (1997). “Subordination” and nonverbal sensitivity: A study and synthesis of findings based on trait measures. Sex Roles, 37, 295–317.Google Scholar
Hall, J. A., Murphy, N. A., & Schmid Mast, M. (2006). Recall of nonverbal cues: Exploring a new definition of interpersonal sensitivity. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 30, 141–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, J. A., & Schmid Mast, M. (2008). Are women always more interpersonally sensitive than men? Impact of content domain and motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 144–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, J. A., Schmid Mast, M., & Latu, I. (2015). The vertical dimension of social relations and accurate interpersonal perception: A meta-analysis. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 39, 131–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, J. A., Ship, A. N., Ruben, M. A., Curtin, E. M., Roter, D. L., Clever, S. L., … & Pounds, K. (2014). The Test of Accurate Perception of Patients’ Affect (TAPPA): An ecologically valid tool for assessing interpersonal perception accuracy in clinicians. Patient Education and Counseling, 94, 218–223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hampson, E., van Anders, S. M., & Mullin, L. I. (2006). A female advantage in the recognition of emotional facial expressions: Test of an evolutionary hypothesis. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 401–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henley, N. M. (1977). Body politics: Power, sex, and nonverbal communication. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Herlitz, A., & Loven, J. (2013). Sex differences and the own-gender bias in face recognition: A meta-analytic review. Visual Cognition, 21, 1306–1336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horgan, T. G., McGrath, M. P., & Long, J. A. (2009). The relevance of people versus objects in explaining women’s advantage over men in appearance accuracy. Sex Roles, 60, 890–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horgan, T. G., Schmid Mast, M., Hall, J. A., & Carter, J. D. (2004). Gender differences in memory for the appearance of others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 185–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horgan, T. G., & Smith, J. L. (2006). Interpersonal reasons for interpersonal perceptions: Gender-congruent purpose goals and nonverbal judgment accuracy. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 30, 127–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horgan, T.G., Stein, J. M., Southworth, J., & Swarbrick, M. (2012). Gender differences in memory for what others say about themselves and their family members. Journal of Individual Differences, 33, 169–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ickes, W., Gesn, P. R., & Graham, T. (2000). Gender differences in empathic accuracy: Differential ability or differential motivation? Personal Relationships, 7, 95–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jobson, S., & Watson, J. S. (1984). Sex and age differences in choice behavior: The object-person dimension. Perception, 13, 719–724.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirkland, R. A., Peterson, E., Baker, C. A., Miller, S., & Pulos, S. (2013). Meta-analysis reveals adult female superiority in “Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test.” North American Journal of Psychology, 15, 121–146.Google Scholar
Klein, K. J. K., & Hodges, S. D. (2001). Gender differences, motivation, and empathic accuracy: When it pays to understand. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 720–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Letzring, T. D. (2008). The good judge of personality: Characteristics, behaviors, and observer accuracy. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 914–932.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Letzring, T. D. (2010). The effects of judge-target gender and ethnicity similarity on the accuracy of personality judgments. Social Psychology, 41, 42–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippa, R. A., & Dietz, J. K. (2000). The relation of gender, personality, and intelligence to judges’ accuracy in judging strangers’ personality from brief video segments. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 24, 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClure, E. B. (2000). A meta-analytic review of sex differences in facial expression processing and their development in infants, children, and adolescents. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 424–453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGivern, R. F., Mutter, K. L., Anderson, J., Wideman, G., Bodnar, M., & Huston, P. J. (1998). Gender differences in incidental learning and visual recognition memory: Support for a sex difference in unconscious environmental awareness. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 223–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKelvie, S. J., Standing, L., St. Jean, D., & Law, J. (1993). Gender differences in recognition memory for faces and cars: Evidence for the interest hypothesis. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31, 447–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKibbin, W. F., Shackelford, T. K., Goetz, A. T., Bates, V. M., Starratt, V. G., & Miner, E. J. (2009). Development and Initial Psychometric Assessment of the Rape Avoidance Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 336–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merten, J. (2005). Culture, gender and the recognition of the basic emotions. Psychologia, 48, 306–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyers-Levy, J., & Maheswaran, D. (1998). Mixed messages. How men and women differ in their responses to marketing messages. Capital Ideas, 1(3), 7–8.Google Scholar
Murphy, N. A., & Hall, J. A. (2011). Intelligence and nonverbal sensitivity: A meta-analysis. Intelligence, 39, 54–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, N. A., Hall, J. A., & Colvin, C. R. (2003). Accurate intelligence assessments in social interaction: Mediators and gender effects. Journal of Personality, 71, 465–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Place, S. S., Todd, P. M., Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2009). The ability to judge the romantic interest of others. Psychological Science, 20, 22–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richard, F. D., Bond, C. F. Jr., & Stokes-Zoota, J. J. (2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7, 331–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, R., Hall, J. A., DiMatteo, M. R., Rogers, P. L., & Archer, D. (1979). Sensitivity to nonverbal communication: The PONS test. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Rosip, J. C., & Hall, J. A. (2004). Knowledge of nonverbal cues, gender, and nonverbal decoding accuracy. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 28, 267–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotter, N. G., & Rotter, G. S. (1988). Sex differences in the encoding and decoding of negative facial expressions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 12, 139–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruben, M. A., & Hall, J. A. (2013). “I know your pain”: Proximal and distal predictors of pain detection accuracy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1346–1358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruffman, T., Murray, J., Halberstadt, J., & Taumeopeau, M. (2010). Verbosity and emotion recognition in older adults. Psychology and Aging, 25, 492–497.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmid Mast, M., & Hall, J. A. (2004). Who is the boss and who is not? Accuracy of judging status. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 28, 145–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid Mast, M., & Hall, J. A. (2006). Women’s advantage at remembering others’ appearance: A systematic look at the why and when of a gender difference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 353–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid Mast, M., Hall, J. A., Murphy, N. A., & Colvin, C. R. (2003). Judging assertiveness. Facta Universitatis, 2, 731–744.Google Scholar
Smith, J., Ickes, W., Hall, J. A., & Hodges, S. (Eds.). (2011). Managing interpersonal sensitivity: Knowing when and when not to understand others. New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Thomas, G., & Fletcher, G. J. O. (2003). Mind-reading accuracy in intimate relationships: Assessing the roles of the relationship, the target, and the judge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1079–1094.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, A. E., & Voyer, D. (2014). Sex differences in the ability to recognize non-verbal displays of emotion: A meta-analysis. Cognition and Emotion, 28, 1164–1195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vassallo, S., Cooper, S. L., & Douglas, J. M. (2009). Visual scanning in the recognition of facial affect: Is there an observer sex difference? Journal of Vision, 9, 1–10.Google Scholar
Vogt, D. S., & Colvin, C. R. (2003). Interpersonal orientation and the accuracy of personality judgements. Journal of Personality, 71, 267–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, L. M., Mathersul, D., Palmer, D. M., Gur, R. C., Gur, R. E., & Gordon, E. (2009). Explicit identification and implicit recognition of facial emotions: 1. Age effects in males and females across 10 decades. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 31, 257–277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yeagley, E., Morling, B., & Nelson, M. (2007). Nonverbal zero-acquaintance accuracy of self-esteem, social dominance orientation, and satisfaction with life. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 1099–1106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckerman, M., & Larrance, D. T. (1979). Individual differences in perceived encoding and decoding abilities. In Rosenthal, R. (Ed.), Skill in nonverbal communication: Individual differences (pp. 171–203). Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×