This section explores integrating multicultural frameworks into migration management in South America, focusing on how various countries have embraced and implemented multiculturalism, interculturalism, and pluriculturalism. Argentina’s Migration Law emphasizes multiculturalism, promoting immigrant integration and respect for cultural diversity. Chile and Bolivia, on the other hand, have integrated interculturalism, focusing on immigrant and native population interactions. Paraguay’s pluriculturalism highlights the diversity inherent to South American nations, focusing on existing cultural differences. Through empirical studies, the section also examines the practical application of these frameworks, discussing how immigrants’ strategies – ranging from assimilation to multiculturalism – impact their integration outcomes. Political discourse and economic concerns are also discussed, highlighting the role of national rhetoric, media, and socioeconomic factors in shaping public attitudes toward immigration in the region. Together, these findings illuminate how South American countries navigate the complexities of migration, identity, and social inclusion.

This chapter explores omniculturalism, a new approach to managing diversity. The first goal of omniculturalism is to manage human relationships within a generally accepted understanding derived from science that all human beings share foundational and important similarities. We humans are very similar to one another, and the contention is that our similarities are – and should be given – far more importance than our differences. The second goal is to acknowledge that in some respects all humans belong to groups that to some degree differ from one another, such as in terms of the languages they speak, the religions they practice, and the colors of their skins. However, these intergroup differences are of minor importance, compared to the foundational similarities all humans share. Omniculturalism involves the active celebration of human similarities (rather than differences). However, attention is given to group distinctiveness at a secondary level.

On the map of modern Hebrew literature, the American Hebrew center remains largely a terra incognita. The chapter considers this often-neglected center from a local perspective by examining the cultural and literary interactions of Hebrew writers in New York City with their non-Jewish environment. By expanding the scope of these interactions to include American literary Naturalism and modern Yiddish literature, I show how Hebrew writers in the United States engaged with and benefited from other literatures and cultures. The chapter focuses on the literary works of Simon Halkin and Abraham Zvi Halevy, particularly their representations of New York City. Halkin’s and Halevy’s oeuvres exemplify the various identity conflicts, ideological polemics, and linguistic possibilities that took place within the multicultural and multilingual space of Interbellum New York. Understanding their literary projects within a broader Jewish American context enriches our understanding of American Hebrew literature.

This chapter examines the psychological foundations of assimilation and multiculturalism. Assimilation is rooted in intergroup contact and similarity-attraction theories, which suggest that increased interaction and perceived commonality between immigrants and host societies foster trust, reduce prejudice, and facilitate integration. However, assimilation faces challenges such as societal resistance, biases, and the tension between maintaining cultural identity and adapting to the dominant society. In contrast, multiculturalism emphasizes the value of cultural diversity. It is grounded in the psychology of cultural identity, intellectual humility, and the belief that embracing one’s culture can promote acceptance of others. Despite its benefits, multiculturalism also faces challenges in balancing diversity with social cohesion and overcoming resistance from dominant groups. This chapter explores how these psychological principles inform both assimilation and multiculturalism, their impact on intergroup relations, and the complexities of integrating immigrants into diverse societies.

This chapter traces early migration from Europe during the Gold Rush and the change from multiculturalism to monoculturalism with the advent of the White Australia policy. However, it focuses primarily on first-generation migrant writers from Europe following World War II. The chapter argues that migration should be viewed through the lens of heterogeneity, shaped by geographic, cultural, linguistic and class disparities. The chapter discusses how first-generation migrants existed as ethnic minorities who often experienced hostility and were directed towards manual employment. It examines the emergence of ethnically specific periodicals, following by literary journals, literary and cultural associations, poetry collections, and anthologies. The chapter identifies a predominant theme of nostalgia, with related elements of loss and hope. Another identified theme is social justice, including empathy for the impact of displacement felt by Aboriginal peoples and a support of Aboriginal sovereignty.

This chapter discusses early Chinese writing in Australian Chinese periodicals at the turn of the twentieth century, which was then followed largely by an absence of Asian voices in Australian anthologies until the late 1950s. It critiques the early anthologies that turned attention to Asia as either focusing only on ‘Australian’ perceptions of Asia or separated ‘Australian’ and ‘Asian’ writers along lines of ethnicity. It discusses the publication of poetry collections by Asian Australian poets as occurring in the late 1980s and 1990s and the emergence of Asian Australian studies in the 1990s in light of American Asian studies. It critiques the limitations of an ‘Asian Australian’ framework along with the tendency to homogenise migrant writers under the rubric of multiculturalism in late twentieth-century Australia. It discusses the emergence of literary magazines as forums for Asian Australian writing and as developing cross-cultural solidarities, and anthologies, criticism and writing that has foregrounded diasporic frameworks and intersectionality. The chapter then undertakes analysis of four major recent writers.

This chapter considers how Australians have looked to South America for what they might become while Argentinians looked to Australia for what Argentina could become. It traces William Lane’s failed utopic colonies in Paraguay in the 1890s and, following her participation in one of them, Mary Gilmore’s engagement with and promotion of Latin American culture to other Australian writers. It considers Latin American migration to Australia, particularly in the late twentieth century. It discusses the role of little magazines, small presses and radio shows in encouraging poetry by Latin American migrants. It analyses their sense of marginalisation to mainstream Australian literary culture, and shifts towards decentring Australia in both writers’ transcultural movements and framings by anthologies. Lastly, the chapter examines recent encounters with Latin America by Australian-born poets and discusses competing framings of the South, including by writers such as J. M. Coetzee and John Mateer.

Historical tensions over race and nation have bubbled over time and resurfaced again since the Brexit vote in the forms of increased racism and a “hostile environment.” British Muslim identity and belonging has been a complex process of negotiation in the British Isles and beyond. This chapter explores how transnational Muslim identities in Britain form digital interconnections and face disruptions in an increasingly securitized global architecture in which the digital serves as a place of contestation and surveillance. Through summary close readings from selected writings by Kamila Shamsie, Mohsin Hamid, Ayisha Malik, and Zaffar Kunial, this chapter emphasizes how Muslim writers translate the limits of a national English identity for migrant groups after Brexit through new representations of enclosed spaces such as gardens and parks.

The goal of this chapter is to introduce systemic racism and critical race theory. It begins with the story of Breonna Taylor, a successful health-care professional and twenty-six-year-old Black woman who was killed in her home in Louisville, Kentucky, by plainclothes White police officers in 2020. It galvanized the Black Lives Matter movement against systemic racism, the approach to racism that recognizes that all institutions and persons play a role in it, including us. This chapter reviews the history of police violence in the US, the defining features of systemic racism and popular myths about it, and some major themes in critical race theory, a framework that can help us see why race and racism were invented and why they persist despite reform. Colorblind racial ideology, multiculturalism, and anti-racism are discussed as strategies that deal with racism. The chapter includes a Food for Thought section on Nikole Hannah-Jones and the 1619 Project. It ends with a discussion of anti-racism, police violence, and justice for Breonna Taylor.

Chapter 6 applies the preceding insights to the problem of inter-cultural and inter-group relations in contemporary societies struggling with multiculturalism. It considers policy implications associated with the integration or assimilation of migrants, that burden migrants with the prospect of learning the ways of life of their host societies. This is known as acculturation. The chapter proceeds to consider the debate between assimilationist or multicultural policy in terms of social capital theory. It makes a case for integration based on social capital terms, whilst noting the challenge this poses to locals concerned about the erosion of their ways of life as a result of accommodating diversity.

In today’s globalized world, a deep understanding of how culture affects international business phenomena is critical to scholarship and practice. Yet, armed with only superficial measures of national cultural differences, scholars and practitioners find themselves stereotype rich and operationally poor where culture meets real-world international business context. “Culture” is substantially more complex than this, made up of multiple interacting cultural spheres (national, regional, institutional, organizational, functional) that are differentially enacted by individuals many of whom are multicultural themselves. Settings in international business are therefore rife with multilevel cultural interactions as individuals with diverging cultural assumptions are brought together in real time (often virtually) across distance and differentiated contexts. This coursebook on ethnography in IB is the first of its kind, offering students, academics, and executives a way to study, understand, reduce uncertainty about, and make the most of the effects of culture in today’s global and multicultural business contexts.

As the prefix “intra” suggests, intracultural ethnography focuses on the cultural dynamics within a given organization. In the case of international business, the cultural arena under study is that of an international organization in one location and the research questions that arise from this kind of study are generally framed at the organizational level of analysis and are focused around making sense of the diverse beliefs, norms, values, and customs that the prople making up these culturally complex organizations use in their day-to-day work. Although culture is a group-level phenomenon, it is enacted by individuals. As such, the cultural identity of the individuals is introduced in this section as the key construct to understand for doing intracultural ethnographic research.

This chapter discusses how writers in the twenty-first century have responded to the legacies of postmodernism. It details various attempts at configuring a post-postmodernism before offering close analysis of a series of British writers who have entered a critical dialogue with postmodernism through their fiction. The novelists are discussed with respect to three main areas. First, the identification of an ethical turn in selected fiction produced by writers associated with postmodernism whose careers were established in the last quarter of the twentieth century (Amis, Barnes, Byatt, McEwan, Winterson). Second, British writers who emerge after 9/11 who, although they adopt several techniques associated with postmodernism, incorporate a new, tentative idealism and elements of realism in terms of both literary form and philosophical belief (Mitchell, Barker, Ali Smith). Third, it looks at how discourses around postcolonialism and multiculturalism impact with postmodernism in selected fiction (Ali, Levy, Rushdie, Zadie Smith).

This chapter claims that in the new millennium, religious conservatives succeed in their struggles to control women’s bodies and to turn their private prejudices into public policy through the misappropriation of human rights and by gaining unwarranted religious exemptions. By allegedly demanding the protection of their own rights to religious liberty, conscientious objection, equality, and multicultural accommodations, religious conservatives are reversing the progress in women’s rights and using liberal rights and concepts as a weapon against women. The chapter argues that, contrary to popular belief, the separation between religion and the state cannot protect women’s rights against the religious conservative attack. It compares the religious conservative attack on women’s rights in the USA, where religion is separated from the state, to the religious conservative attack on women’s rights in Israel, where there is no separation between religion and the state, and shows that despite the very different religion–state relations, the religious conservative attack in the USA and Israel is similar in both method and success.