Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-lvwk9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-19T13:08:15.155Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In Defense of Native Literature: Writers’ Associations, State and the Cult of the Writer in pre-1945 Bulgaria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2018

Irina Gigova
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Looking at Bulgarian society and cultural life of the first half of the 1900s, this study scrutinizes a common belief in the high public esteem reserved for poets and writers in eastern Europe. It demonstrates that the creators of literature (and the national arts in general) occupied a precarious position in a society without a sustainable cultural market. The predicament of Bulgarian writers, however, was that of many European literati in early 1900s competing for readers’ attention with a rising mass culture. Placing Bulgarian writers in a broader interwar framework, this article explores the various non-literary strategies they pursued in affirming the public value of national literature. In the process, it suggests that the lore of “the writer as a national hero” was the deliberate work of social actors seeking to correct an unsatisfying reality and not an expression of an organic relationship between nation and writers (and intellectuals more broadly).

Type
Articles
Information
Slavic Review , Volume 77 , Issue 2 , Summer 2018 , pp. 417 - 440
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Wachtel, Andrew Baruch, Remaining Relevant after Communism: The Role of the Writer in Eastern Europe (Chicago, 2006)Google Scholar, 4, 12, 15, 26.

2. Leerssen, Joep and Rigney, Ann, eds. Commemorating Writers in Nineteenth-Century Europe: Nation-Building and Centenary Fever (New York, 2014), 1–16Google Scholar; Dović, Marijan and Helgason, Jón Karl, National Poets, Cultural Saints: Canonization and Commemorative Cults of Writers in Europe (Leiden, 2017)Google Scholar.

3. For example, Hroch, Miroslav, Social Preconditions of National Revival in Europe: A Comparative Analysis of the Social Composition of Patriotic Groups among the Smaller European Nations (New York, 2000)Google Scholar; Suny, Ronald Grigor and Kennedy, Michael D., eds. Intellectuals and the Articulation of the Nation (Ann Arbor, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4. I eschew the terms “intellectuals” and “intelligentsia” that have long and contested histories. My focus on associational life is served better by the professional designation of “writer” or Bourdieu's, Pierre “cultural producer,” in The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field, trans. Emanuel, Susan (Stanford, 1996)Google Scholar.

5. Among many, Gerwarth, Robert, The Vanquished: Why the First World War Failed to End (New York, 2016)Google Scholar; Bucur, Maria, Eugenics and Modernization in Interwar Romania (Pittsburgh, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Turda, Marius and Weindling, Paul J., eds., Blood and Homeland: Eugenics and Racial Nationalism in Central and Southeast Europe, 1900–1940 (Budapest, 2007)Google Scholar; Hanebrink, Paul, In Defense of Christian Hungary: Religion, Nationalism, and Antisemitism, 1890–1944 (Ithaca, 2006)Google Scholar; Plach, Eva, The Clash of Moral Nations: Cultural Politics in Piłsudski's Poland, 1926–1935 (Athens, OH, 2006)Google Scholar; Shore, Marci, Caviar and Ashes: A Warsaw Generation's Life and Death in Marxism, 1918–1968 (New Haven, 2006)Google Scholar; Livezeanu, Irina, Cultural Politics in Greater Romania: Regionalism, Nation Building and Ethnic Struggle, 1918–1930 (Ithaca, 1995)Google Scholar; Banac, Ivo and Verdery, Katherine, eds., National Character and National Ideology in Interwar Eastern Europe (New Haven, 1995)Google Scholar; Lampe, John and Mazower, Mark, eds., Ideologies and National Identities: The Case of Twentieth-Century Southeastern Europe (Budapest, 2004)Google Scholar; Mishkova, Diana, Turda, Marius, and Trencsényi, Balázs, eds., Discourses of Collective Identity in Central and Southeast Europe (1770-1945): Texts and Commentaries, Vol. IV. Anti-modernism – Radical Revisions of Collective Identity (Budapest, 2014)Google Scholar.

6. On cultural trends, see Berend, Ivan T., Decades of Crisis: Central and Eastern Europe before World War II (Berkeley, 1998)Google Scholar; Ort, Thomas, Art and Life in Modernist Prague: Karel Čapek and His Generation, 1911–1938 (New York, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; regretfully, Bulgaria is not represented in Mansbach, S.A., Modern Art in Eastern Europe: From the Baltic to the Balkans, ca. 1890–1939 (Cambridge, 1999)Google Scholar and Benson, Timothy, ed. Central European Avant-gardes: Exchange and Transformation, 1910–1930 (Los Angeles, 2002)Google Scholar.

7. Waller, Philip, Writers, Readers, and Reputations: Literary Life in Britain 1870–1918 (Oxford, 2006)Google Scholar, 3.

8. Kurzman, Charles and Owens, Lynn, “The Sociology of Intellectuals,” Annual Review of Sociology 28 (2002), 63–64Google Scholar.

9. Bauman, Zygmunt, Legislators and Interpreters: On Modernity, Post-Modernity and Intellectuals (Cambridge, 1987), 124Google Scholar.

10. Carey, John, The Intellectuals and the Masses: Pride and Prejudice among the Literary Intelligentsia, 1880–1939 (Chicago, 2002)Google Scholar; Jennings, Jeremy, “Deaths of the Intellectual: A Comparative Autopsy,” in Small, Helen, ed., The Public Intellectual (Oxford, 2002), 110–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11. Benda, Julien, The Treason of the Intellectuals, trans. Aldington, Richard (New York, 1969)Google Scholar.

12. José Ortega y Gasset, The Revolt of the Masses (New York, 1960)Google Scholar, first published in Spanish in 1930.

13. Markovits, Andrei S., Uncouth Nation: Why Europe Dislikes America (Princeton, 2007)Google Scholar; and Ellwood, David, The Shock of America: Europe and the Challenge of the Century (Oxford, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14. Trouillot, Michel-Rolph, Silencing the Past: Power and the Production of History (Boston, 1995)Google Scholar. Professional guilds are missing in the otherwise excellent four-volume series edited by Cornis-Pope, Marcel and Neubauer, John, eds. History of the Literary Cultures of East-Central Europe: Junctures and Disjunctures in the 19th and 20th Centuries (Amsterdam, 2004–2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15. Atkinson, Benedict and Fitzgerald, Brian, A Short History of Copyright: The Genie of Information (Cham, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hack, Daniel, “Literary Paupers and Professional Authors: The Guild of Literature and Art,” Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900, 39, no. 4 (Autumn 1999): 691–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Colby, Robert A., “Authors Unite!: An Anglo-American Alliance, Victorian Periodicals Review 26, no. 3 (Fall 1993): 125–32Google Scholar.”

16. Wilford, R. A., “The PEN Club, 1930–50,” Journal of Contemporary History 14, no. 1 (1979): 99–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Orzoff, Andrea, “Prague PEN and Central European Cultural Nationalism, 1924–1935,” Nationalities Papers: The Journal of Nationalism and Ethnicity 29, no. 2 (2001): 243–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Martin, Benjamin George, “‘European Literature’ in the Nazi New Order: The Cultural Politics of the European Writers’ Union, 1941–3,” Journal of Contemporary History 48, no. 3 (2013): 486–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17. Čivrný, Lumír, “Good and Bad Times: Seventy Years of the Czech PEN Club,” in Literature and Tolerance: Views from Prague (Prague, 1994), 25–76Google Scholar.

18. Ritzer, George, “Professionalization, Bureaucratization and Rationalization: The Views of Max Weber,” Social Forces 53, no. 4 (June 1975): 627–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar. More recently, Jarausch, Konrad, The Unfree Professions: German Lawyers, Teachers and Engineers, 1900–1950 (New York, 1990)Google Scholar; McClelland, Charles E., The German Experience of Professionalization: Modern Learned Professions and their Organization from the Early Nineteenth Century to the Hitler Era (Cambridge, 1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kovacs, Maria M., Liberal Professions and Illiberal Politics: Hungary from the Habsburgs to the Holocaust (Washington, 1994)Google Scholar; Krause, Elliott A., Death of the Guilds: Professions, States, and the Advance of Capitalism, 1930 to the Present (New Haven, 1996)Google Scholar.

19. Martin, Benjamin G., The Nazi-Fascist New Order for European Culture (Cambridge, Mass., 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20. Steinweis, Alan E., Art, Ideology, and Economics in Nazi Germany: The Reich Chamber of Music, Theater, and the Visual Arts (Chapel Hill, 1993)Google Scholar; Kater, Michael H., The Twisted Muse: Musicians and Their Music in the Third Reich (New York, 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lasansky, D. Medina, The Renaissance Perfected: Architecture, Spectacle and Tourism in Fascist Italy (University Park, 2004)Google Scholar.

21. Krause, Death of the Guilds, 3.

22. Berezin, Mabel, “The Organization of Political Ideology: Culture, State, and Theater in Fascist Italy,” American Sociological Review 56, no. 5 (October 1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar: 648.

23. Statisticheski godishnik na bŭlgarskoto tsarstvo (1929–1930), 14, 22, 36–39.

24. Gergova, Ani, Knizhninata i bŭlgarite: XIX—nachaloto na XX vek (Sofia, 1991), 160–70Google Scholar.

25. Anchova, Kalinka, “Sŭzdavane na sŭiuza na bŭlgarskite pisateli prez esenta na 1913 g. v arhivni dokumenti i spomeni na ochevidtsi,” Izvestiia na dŭrzhavnite arhivi, no. 65 (1993): 197–227Google Scholar; Drŭndarov, Georgi, Atanasov, Nikola, Borina, Hristo Ts., Karaivanov, Georgi, Istoriia na sŭiuza na bŭlgarskite pisateli, 1913–1944 (Sofia, 2003), 8–16Google Scholar.

26. Gergova, Knizhninata, 175–76, 195–207; Konstantinov, Konstantin, Pŭt prez godinite (Sofia, 1966)Google Scholar.

27. Mishkova, Diana, “Literacy and Nation-building in Bulgaria, 1878–1912,” East European Quarterly 28, no. 1 (1994); 63–93Google Scholar; Drace-Francis, Alex, The Making of Modern Romanian Culture: Literacy and the Development of National Identity (London, 2006)Google Scholar; Anderson, Benedict, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism (London, 2006)Google Scholar.

28. Koneva, Rumiana, Goliamata sreshta na bŭlgarskiia narod: Kulturata i predizvikatelstvata na voinite, 1912–1918 g. (Sofia, 1995)Google Scholar; Georgiev, Velichko, Bŭlgarskata inteligentsia i natsionalnata kauza v Pŭrvata svetovna voina: Sŭiuzŭt na bŭlgarskite ucheni, pisateli i khudozhnitsi, 1917–1918 (Sofia, 2000)Google Scholar; Kelbetcheva, Evelina, “Between Apology and Denial: Bulgarian Culture during World War I,” in Roshwald, Aviel and Stites, Richard, eds., European Culture in the Great War: The Arts, Entertainment, and Propaganda, 1914–1918 (Cambridge, 1999), 215–42Google Scholar.

29. Drŭndarov et al., Istoriia na sŭiuza, 42–58.

30. Nikola Atanasov, quoted in Anchova, “Sŭzdavane,” 200, 216.

31. “Literaturni belezhki, novini, i pr.,” Zveno no. 4–5 (1914), 160–63Google Scholar.

32. Towheed, Shafquat and King, Edmund, eds. Reading and the First World War: Readers, Texts, Archives (New York, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

33. Bŭlgarski periodichen pechat, 1844–1944: Anotiran bibliografski ukazatel, vol. 1 (Sofia, 1962)Google Scholar, 477, 480.

34. Koneva, Goliamata sreshta, 89–93, 98–99; Kelbecheva, “Between Apology and Denial,” 219–22.

35. Dimitrova, Snezhana, “‘Taming the Death’: The Culture of Death (1915–18) and its Remembering and Commemorating through First World War Soldier Monuments in Bulgaria (1917–44),” Social History 30, no. 2 (May 2005), 177–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

36. Statisticheski godishnik na bŭlgarskoto tsarstvo (1926), 95.

37. Statisticheski godishnik na bŭlgarskoto tsarstvo (1928), 423.

38. Crampton, R. J., Bulgaria (Oxford, 2007), 210–24Google Scholar; Crampton, R. J., Aleksandur Stamboliiski, Bulgaria: Makers of the Modern World, The Peace Conferences of 1919–23 and Their Aftermath (London, 2009)Google Scholar.

39. Georgiev, Bŭlgarskata inteligentsiia.

40. Vasileva, Sofia, Sŭiuz na druzhestvata na khudozhnitsite v Bŭlgariia: Predistoriia, organizatsiia i deinost, 1919–1945 (Sofia, 2012), 43–53Google Scholar.

41. Dimitrov, Emanuil p., “Poziv kŭm bŭlgarskiia pisatel,” Ognishte 1, no. 2 (1919), 111–13Google Scholar.

42. Moser, Charles A., A History of Bulgarian Literature, 865–1944 (The Hague, 1972), 181–250Google Scholar; Igov, Svetlozar, Istoriia na bŭlgarskata literatura (Sofia, 2002), 613- 786Google Scholar; Genova, Irina and Dimitrova, Tatiana, Izkustvoto v Bŭlgariia prez 1920-te godini: Modernizŭm i natsionalna ideia (Sofia, 2002)Google Scholar. For regional developments, see Hitchins, Keith, Rumania 1866–1947 (Oxford, 1994), 292–334Google Scholar.

43. Ivan Meshekov coined the phrase in his semi-autobiographical Liavo pokolenie ot gimnaziiata do okopite, 1907–1917 (Sofia, 1934)Google Scholar. On leftwing literature, see Avdzhiev, Zheliu, Esteticheskoto tŭrzhestvo na sotsialisticheskata literatura, 1919–1923 (Sofia, 1975)Google Scholar.

44. Dimitrov, Emil, Pamet, iubilei, kanon: Uvod v sotsiologiiata na bŭlgarskata literatura (Sofia, 2012), 36–80Google Scholar.

45. On the idea of moral rebirth in the 1920s, see Plach, The Clash. On the Revival, see Daskalov, Roumen, The Making of a Nation in the Balkans: Historiography of the Bulgarian Revival (Budapest, 2004)Google Scholar; Todorova, Maria, Bones of Contention: The Living Archive of Vasil Levski and the Making of Bulgaria's National Hero (Budapest, 2009)Google Scholar; more broadly Hroch, Social Preconditions; Wachtel, Remaining Relevant, 12–43; Berend, Ivan T., History Derailed: Central and Eastern Europe in the Long Nineteenth Century (Berkeley, 2003), 41–82Google Scholar.

46. Weber, Claudia, “‘Opiti za sŭzhiviavane’: Kŭm nachalata na bŭlgarskata kultura na pametta,” Balkanistichen forum, no. 1–3 (1999), 158–66;Google Scholar Hranova, Albena, “Historian Myths: the Bulgarian Case of Pride and Prejudice,” in Kolstø, Pål, ed., Myths and Boundaries in South-Eastern Europe (London, 2005), 297–324Google Scholar; and Todorova, Bones of Contention, 221–27.

47. Khristo Ts. Borina, writing in 1933, claimed the performance's public success inspired the Day of National Awakeners discussed below. Drŭndarov et al., Istoriia na sŭiuza, 29.

48. Dimitrov, Pamet, iubilei, kanon, 62–136; Chilingirov, Stilian, ed. Pomen za Ivana Vazov: sbornik za traurnite chestvuvaniia na narodniia poet ot 22 do 28 septemvri 1921 god (Sofia, 1922)Google Scholar; TsDA (Central State Archive), f. 177k (Ministry of National Education), op. 1, a.e. 876, ll. 30, 60.

49. Denchev, Stoian and Vasileva, Sofia, Dŭrzhavna politika za kulturno-istoricheskoto nasledstvo na Bŭlgariia, 1878–2009 (Sofia, 2010), 181–82Google Scholar; Dimitrov, Pamet, 166–81. On citizen committees, see TsDA, f. 177k, op. 1, a.e. 876, ll. 1–30; op. 2, a.e. 196, 287 and 668, ll. 105–78.

50. Vasileva, Sŭiuz na druzhestvata, 48; Velev, Aleksandŭr, Prosvetna i kutlurna politika na pravitelstvoto na Aleksandŭr Stamboliiski (Sofia, 1980), 168–89Google Scholar.

51. Crampton, Bulgaria, 224–36 and Velev, Prosvetna i kutlurna politika.

52. Drŭndarov et al., Istoriia na sŭiuza, 122–23.

53. For example, “Nagradite za literatura i izkustvo,” Zlatorog 7, no. 2–3 (1926), 139–41Google Scholar; V. P. “Literaturni premii,” Ognishte 4, no. 1 (1926), 30–31Google Scholar.

54. Balabanov, Nikola and Manev, Andrei, eds. Sbornik s otbrani okrŭzhni ot Osvobozhdenieto do kraia na 1942 (Sofia, 1943), 617–19Google Scholar, 712–20.

55. TsDA, f. 177k, op. 2, a.e. 196, ll. 34, 40–45, 56; scholarly treatment in Dimitrov, 232–65. On Hungary see Kovacs, Liberal Professions, 50; and Nagy, Zsolt, “National Identities for Export: East European Cultural Diplomacy in Inter-War Pittsburgh,” Contemporary European History 20, no. 4 (November 2011): 435–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

56. “Bulgaria En Fete for Ancient Glory,” New York Times, May 13, 1929, 6.

57. Ibid.; also “Peasants throng Sofia for Fetes,” New York Times, May 15, 1929, 6.

58. TsDA, f. 177k, op. 2, a.e. 287.

59. Statisticheski godishnik na bŭlgarskoto tsarstvo (1926), 286–87Google Scholar; (1928), 272–75; (1931), 346–47.

60. Brŭzitsov, Khristo D., Bŭlgarski knigoizdateli (Sofia, 1976)Google Scholar; Nanchev, Iordan, Stranitsi za Aleksandŭr Paskalev (Sofia, 2009)Google Scholar.

61. Igov, Istoriia, 613–786; Zarev, Pantalei, Istoriia na bŭlgarskata literaturna kritika (Sofia, 1996)Google Scholar; Likova, Rozaliia, Literaturniiat zhivot mezhdu dvete voini (Sofia, 1995)Google Scholar.

62. Amicus Plato, “Za bŭlgarskata kniga,” Mir, November 27, 1926, 1; Konstantin Gŭlŭbov, “Za bŭgarskata kniga,” Izgrev, October 10, 1926; Kiril Krŭstev,” Chitateliat misli,” Razvigor, October 9, 1926, 2; D. Dimitrov, “Za prochitnata kniga,” Razvigor, January 15, 1927, 3; Geno Dochev, “Biblioteka za naroda,” Razvigor, January 29, 1927, 6; Nik. Atanasov, “Razvrateniiat chitatel,” Razvigor, May 7, 1927, 2; Ot. H. Koledarov, “Bŭlgarskata knizhnina i vnosŭt na chuzhdata u nas,” Mir, April 23, 1928.

63. Petkov, Tsviatko, Knigata i uchenitsite: Anketa proizvedena v Vrachanski Ucheben Okrŭg (Vratsa, 1927)Google Scholar.

64. Vasil Stavrev, “Izlozhba na bŭlgarskata kniga v Varna,” Razvigor, February 26, 1927, 6; Borov, Todor, “Den na bŭlgarskata kniga,” Bŭlgarska kniga 1, no. 4–5 (September 1930), 471–72Google Scholar.

65. Heath, Lesley, “Society of Women Writers 1925–1935,” Australian Literary Studies 21, no. 3 (2004), 367Google Scholar.

66. Balabanov and Manev, Sbornik, 897–98; Drŭndarov et al., Istoriia na sŭiuza, 127, 150, 200–202.

67. A. Karaliichev, “Dve biblioteki za naroda,” Sŭvremennik, October 7, 1931, 3; G. Nokov, “Detskata literatura i Ministerstvoto na prosvetata,” Sŭvremennik, December 9, 1931, 4.

68. “Iz pisatelskiia sŭiuz,” Zlatorog 11, no. 3 (1930), 182Google Scholar.

69. “Literaturen post: Kŭde e Pisatelkiiat sŭiuz?” Sŭvremennik, October 21, 1931, 1; also Vladimir Vasilev's archive in TsDA, f. 373k, op. l, a.e. 283, l. 16.

70. Anchova, Kalinka, “Kulturno-profesionalnite sdruzhenia na khudozhestveno-tvorchestkata inteligentsiia v obshtestveno-politicheskiia zhivot na Bŭlgariia (1934–1935),” Izvestiia na dŭrzhavnite arkhivi, no. 62 (1991): 5–41Google Scholar.

71. Vladimir Polianov, “Oshtestvoto na narodite na literaturna pochva,” Razvigor, October 9, 1926, 1.

72. Gigova, Irina, “The Feminisation of Bulgarian Literature and the Club of Bulgarian Women Writers,” Aspasia 2 (2008): 91–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

73. By 1935, it had 76 members (63 men and 13 women) and more funds than the Union's roughly 100 members. TsDA, f. 142k (Asen Raztsvetnikov), op. 1, a.e. 124.

74. It had some 80 members by 1937. National Literary Museum (NLM), Inv. no. 1273/85, 1274/85, 1285/85, 1286/85, 1287/85.

75. Steinweis, Art, Ideology, 17–20, Martin, The Nazi-Fascist New Order, 26–32.

76. Drŭndarov et al., Istoria na sŭiuza, 154.

77. Ibid., 153–261.

78. Plach, The Clash; Berend, Decades of Crisis, 330–45; Fischer, Bernd J., ed., Balkan Strongmen: Dictators and Authoritarian Rulers of South Eastern Europe (West Lafayette, 2007)Google Scholar; Velichkova, Gergana, Propaganda na fashizma v Bŭlgariia, 1922–1934 (Sofia, 2002)Google Scholar; Poppetrov, Nikolai, “Opiti za dirizhirane na kulturata v Bŭlgariia (1934–1944),” in Baeva, Iskra, ed. Moderna Bŭlgariia: Sbornik v chest na 65-godishninite na profesor d-r Velichko Georgiev i akademik Ilcho Dimitrov (Sofia, 1999), 182–202Google Scholar.

79. Mutafchiev, Petŭr, “Kŭm novo vŭzrazhdane,” Otets Paisii 8, no. 1 (1935), 3–9Google Scholar. On the article's reception, see Daskalov, The Making of a Nation, 228–31.

80. Poppetrov, “Opiti,” 188.

81. Atanasov, Nikola, “Pisatel—obshtestveno-kulturen factor,” Bŭlgarska misŭl 10, no. 3 (1935), 139–40Google Scholar.

82. Liudmil Stoianov, “Dŭlgŭt na pisatelite,” Chas, September 19, 1936, 3.

83. Drŭndarov et al., Istoria na sŭiuza, 296.

84. The leader of the Guild of Historical Writers (and future chairman of the Writers’ Union) Stiliian Chilingirov explicitly employed this rhetoric in 1935 when he asked the Ministry of Education for financial assistance. TsDA, f. 177k, op. 2, a.e. 710, ll. 15–18, and a.e. 711, ll. 51–59.

85. Examples from Literaturen glas: M. Neiova-Genadieva, “Smŭrtniiat akt na dneshnata literatura,” December 12, 1936, 1; Vasile Khristu, “Karnavalŭt na bŭlgarskata literatura,” January 19, 1937, 1; Khr. Gandev, “Kulturata umira,” January 27, 1937, 1–2; Met. N. Marinov, “Avtor i chitatel,” November 17, 1937.

86. Three months in 1937 saw the passing of poet Mara Belcheva, humorist and translator Dimitŭr Podvŭrzachov, and novelists and playwrights Iordan Iovkov and Anton Strashimirov.

87. T. Nikolov, “Bŭlgarskata kniga,” Mir, December 11, 1934, 1.

88. Iordan Cholakov, “Bŭlgarskia pisatel v nemilost,” Literaturen glas, April 27, 1938, 1–2.

89. Not unlike French philosophers’ embrace of television from the 1950s on, Chaplin, Tamara, Turning on the Mind: French Philosophers on Television (Chicago, 2007)Google Scholar.

90. Skitnik, Sirak, “Stsena i radio-stsena,” Zlatorog 18, no. 1 (1937)Google Scholar.

91. Veselin Dimitrov, Istoriia na radioto v Bŭlgariia (kraiat na XIX vek-1944), vol. 1 and especially vol. 2 (Sofia, 1994).

92. TsDA, f. 551 (Union of Bulgarian Writers), op. 1, a.e. 5, ll. 1–4.

93. Drŭndarov et al., Istoria na sŭiuza, 277–308; TsDA, f. 551, op. 1, a.e. 5, ll. 35–44.

94. Drŭndarov et al., Istoria na sŭiuza, 274–76.

95. The committee included representatives of the Writers’ Union, the Club of Female Writers, the Association of Children's Writers, Sofia University faculty, the unions of the periodical press, publishers, journalists, educators, and the national network of reading clubs (chitalishta). TsDA, f. 177k, op. 2, a.e. 1048, ll. 20–25, and a.e. 1173, ll. 9. There is no evidence it was influenced by the Week of the German Book celebrated since 1935 in Weimar, see Martin, The Nazi-Fascist New Order, 226.

96. TsDA, f. 551, op. 1, a.e. 5, ll. 14, 34–44.

97. NLM, Inv. No. a 1023/82; also Vladimir Polianov, “S flota kûm Balchik,” Literaturen glas, November 6, 1940, 3–4.

98. TsDA, f. 177k, op. 2, a.e. 1517, ll. 37–38.

99. “Otkrivaneto na sedmitsata na bŭlgarskata kniga,” Dnes, April 28, 1941, 1–3.

100. “Ot Okhridskoto ezero do Cherno more i ot Dunav do Bialo more za bŭlgarskiia narod zapochva nov politeshki i dukhoven zhivot,” and “Vŭzroditelnata rolia na bŭlgarskata kniga se zavŭrshi,” Dnes, April 28, 1941, 1–3.

101. Roudometof, V., “Toward an Archeology of National Commemorations in the Balkans,” in Geisler, Michael E., ed., National Symbols, Fractured Identities: Contesting the National Narrative (Middlebury, 2005), 35–59Google Scholar; Mihaylova, Aneta, “Commemorating the Nation: The Political Uses of National Day Celebration (Some Examples from the Balkans),” Études Balkaniques 44, no. 4, (2008), 190–91Google Scholar.

102. TsDA, f. 177k, op. 4, a.e. 572, ll. 32, 227–30; Filova, Evdokia, Dnevnik: Mai 1939–15 avgust 1944 (Sofia, 1992), 90–91Google Scholar.

103. TsDA, f. 551, op. 1, a.e. 1, l. 2; NLM, Inv. No. a 631/78.

104. Nemirov, Dobri, I vechna da e!: Iz Makedoniia (Sofia, 1941)Google Scholar; Chilingirov, Stiliian, Prez Makedoniia (Sofia, 1941)Google Scholar.

105. Karaliichev, Angel, “Velikiiat Vazov,” Bŭlgarska misŭl 16, no. 7 (1941), 23Google Scholar.

106. “Programa za tŭrzhestvata na Ivan Vazov,” Dnes, September 20, 1941, 4; TsDA, f. 551, op. 1, a.e. 1, ll. 6–7; TsDA, f. 177k, op. 2, a.e. 1173, l. 9, a.e. 1513, ll. 20, 22, 29, 30–32, and a.e. 1517, ll. 5–6, 104–05.

107. TsDA, f. 177k, op. 1, a.e. 1517, l. 104–05.

108. “Pred borbi li se namira Pisatelskiat sajuz,” Svetovna ilustrovana sedmica, no. 53 (February 9, 1940), 3Google Scholar. See also TsDA, f. 108k, op. 2, a.e. 1366, l. 30.

109. Drŭndarov et al., Istoriia na sŭiuza, 318–68.; TsDA, f. 551, op. 1, a.e. 1, l. 13–14; ABAN (Archive of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences), f. 58k, op. 1, a.e. 147.; TsDA, f. 177k, op. 4, a.e. 572, ll. 75–76.

110. TsDA, f. 177k, op. 4, a.e. 596 and 598.

111. Statistical yearbooks show dramatic increase of the Union's revenues from 26,584 lv in 1936 to 291,386 lv in 1939. In comparison, in 1939 the Club of Bulgarian Women Writers made 34,929 lv, the Association of Children's Writers—19,850 lv and the P.E.N Club—2,057 lv. The 1943 Union budget projected revenue of 725,500 lv. TsDA, f. 551, op. 1, a.e. 5, ll. 94–99.

112. Hristova, Natalia, “‘Sotsialisticheskii realizm΄ i drama bolgarskogo tvortsa (seredina 40-kh–seredina 50-kh godov),” Bulgarian Historical Review 26, 1–2 (1998), 152–78Google Scholar; and Migev, Vladimir, Bŭlgarskite pisateli i politicheskiiat zhivot v Bŭlgariia, 1944–1970 (Sofia, 2001), 9–53Google Scholar.

113. For example, Dimitrova, Nina, Chasŭt na bŭlgarskata inteligentsiia: Bŭlgarskata inteligentsiia v mezhduvoennia periodichen pechat (Sofia, 2010)Google Scholar; and Emil Dimitrov, Pamet, iubilei, kanon.

114. Vasileva, Sŭiuz na druzhestvata; See also Anchova, “Kulturno-profesionalnite,” and Zagorov, Vasil, “Borba za otseliavane: Sistemi za knigorazporstranenie mezhdu dvete svetovni voini,” in Kamenova, Elena, ed., Medii, komunikatsiia, obshtestvo (Sofia, 2009), 93–108Google Scholar. The 1942 statistical yearbook showed artists and actors beating writers in fundraising. In 1939, the 311-member Union of Artists’ Association in Bulgaria reported close to 1.04 million lv in revenues; the Union of Actors (with 354 members) had 1.2m; while the 125 members of the Writers’ Union showed 290,000 lv.

115. For a continent-wide exploration of the 1920s and 1930s, see Martin, The Nazi-Fascist New Order.

116. Berezin distinguishes four variations of state control over cultural producers and cultural products: pluralism, cultural protectionism, state paternalism, and totalitarianism in “The Organization of Political Ideology,” 642.

117. For example, Chary, Frederick B., “The Bulgarian Writers’ Protest of October 1940 Against the Introduction of Anti-Semitic Legislation into the Kingdom of Bulgaria,” East European Quarterly 4, no. 1 (March 1970), 88–93Google Scholar.

118. Haraszti, Miklós, The Velvet Prison: Artists Under State Socialism, trans. Katalin, and Landesmann, Stephen (New York, 1987)Google Scholar.

119. Gigova, Irina, “The Feeble Charm of National(ist) Communism: Intellectuals and Cultural Politics in Zhivkov's Bulgaria,” in Hashamova, Yana and Dragostinova, Theodora, eds. Beyond Mosque, Church, and State: Alternative Narratives of the Nation in the Balkans (Budapest, 2016), 151–77Google Scholar.