You are viewing content intended for a different location. This may affect your ability to shop online.

Our systems are now restored following recent technical disruption, and we’re working hard to catch up on publishing. We apologise for the inconvenience caused. Find out more

Recommended product

Popular links

Popular links


A Systematic Theory of Argumentation

A Systematic Theory of Argumentation

A Systematic Theory of Argumentation

The pragma-dialectical approach
Authors:
Frans H. van Eemeren, Universiteit van Amsterdam
Rob Grootendorst, Universiteit van Amsterdam
Published:
November 2003
Availability:
Available
Format:
Paperback
ISBN:
9780521537728

Looking for an examination copy?

If you are interested in the title for your course we can consider offering an examination copy. To register your interest please contact collegesales@cambridge.org providing details of the course you are teaching.

    Two authorities in argumentation theory present a view of argumentation as a means of resolving differences of opinion by testing the acceptability of the disputed positions. Their model of a "critical discussion" serves as a theoretical tool for analyzing, evaluating and producing argumentative discourse. This major contribution to the study of argumentation will be of particular value to professionals and graduate students in speech communication, informal logic, rhetoric, critical thinking, linguistics, and philosophy.

    • Sales of Walton Informal Logic indicates strength of this market
    • An advanced book, not a textbook, that could do very well for us given the reputation of authors (Amsterdam is major center for research in critical reasoning)

    Reviews & endorsements

    "...a major event in argumentation theory scholarship." Michael C. Leff, Northwestern University

    Product details

    • Published: April 2006
    • Format: Adobe eBook Reader
    • ISBN: 9780511162459
    • Length: 0 pages
    • Weight: 0kg
    • Contains: 2 b/w illus.
    • Availability: This ISBN is for an eBook version which is distributed on our behalf by a third party.

    Table of Contents

    • 1. Introduction
    • 2. The realm of argumentation studies
    • 3. A model of a critical discussion
    • 4. Relevance
    • 5. Analysis as reconstruction
    • 6. Rules for a critical discussion
    • 7. Fallacies
    • 8. A code of conduct for reasonable discussants.

    Authors

    Frans H. van Eemeren , Universiteit van Amsterdam

    Rob Grootendorst , Universiteit van Amsterdam