Lawmaking under Authoritarianism

Why are legislatures in some authoritarian regimes more powerful than others? Why does influence on policies and politics vary across dictatorships? To answer these questions, Lawmaking under Authoritarianism extends the power-sharing theory of authoritarian government to argue that autocracies with balanced factional politics have more influential legislatures than regimes with unbalanced or unstable factional politics. Where factional politics is balanced, autocracies have reviser legislatures that amend and reject significant shares of executive initiatives and are able to block or reverse policies preferred by dictators. When factional politics is unbalanced, notary legislatures may amend executive bills but rarely reject them, and regimes with unstable factional politics oscillate between these two extremes. Lawmaking under Authoritarianism employs novel datasets based on extensive archival research to support these findings, including strong qualitative case studies for past dictatorships in Argentina, Brazil, and Spain.

• Explains the institutional design and lawmaking outcomes of legislatures across different types of dictatorship
• Provides new evidence on how the authoritarian regimes of Argentina (1976–83), Brazil (1964–85) and Spain (1936–76) actually worked
• Establishes a theoretical foundation for better understanding the influence of legislatures on regime transitions