Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-dc8c957cd-mn2s7 Total loading time: 0.278 Render date: 2022-01-28T23:06:22.997Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

3 - Positive Creativity and Negative Creativity (and Unintended Consequences)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Keith James
Affiliation:
Portland State University
Aisha Taylor
Affiliation:
Portland State University
David H. Cropley
Affiliation:
University of South Australia
Arthur J. Cropley
Affiliation:
University of Hamburg
James C. Kaufman
Affiliation:
California State University at San Bernardino
Mark A. Runco
Affiliation:
University of Georgia
Get access

Summary

THE UTILITY OF DISTINGUISHING POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE CREATIVITY

Creativity is important to the lone soul; to groups large, small, formal, and informal; and to whole societies and cultures (Csikszentmihalyi, 1999). To capitalize on creativity, however, individuals, organizations, and societies need to understand how different types of people will respond, as far as creativity goes, to different conditions and tasks (Amabile, 1996).

Virtually all existing empirical and theoretical work on creativity to this point, however, has either explicitly focused on or implicitly assumed only positive outcomes from creativity (James, Clark, & Cropanzano, 1999; McLaren, 1993, 1999). That is, creativity is seen as the production of beneficial products (concrete or abstract) by novel means. Discussions of creativity tend to assume that it is always socially desirable. Although a few individuals have mentioned the possibility of negative creativity, that side of creativity has received relatively little research or theoretical attention. Creativity can, though, produce results that are damaging or unpleasant to other individuals, to groups, or to society at large.

Both the most widely used definitions of creativity and the full range of real-world instances of it indicate that creativity does not necessarily produce positive effects. Probably the most widely used definition of creativity is the generation of products or problem solutions that are both novel and useful (Amabile, 1996; James et al., 1999; Runco, 1991). Usefulness is subjective; what is useful to me could be either useless or harmful to you.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amabile, T. M. (1989). Growing up creative. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to “The Social Psychology of Creativity.”Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1154–1184.Google Scholar
Baas, M., Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus?Psychological Bulletin, 134, 779–806.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bellah, C. G., Bellah, L. D., & Johnson, J. L. (2003). A look at dispositional vengefulness from the three and five-factor models of personality. Individual Differences Research, 1, 6–16.Google Scholar
Berry, C. M., Ones, D. S., & Sackett, P. R. (2007). Interpersonal deviance, organizational deviance, and their common correlates: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 410–424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, J. D. & Marshall, M. A. (2001). Great expectations: Optimism and pessimism in achievement settings. In Chang, E. C. (Ed.), Optimism & pessimism: Implications for theory, research, and practice (pp. 239–255). Washington: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, P. Y., Spector, P. E., & Jex, S. M. (1995). Effects of manipulated job stressors and job attitude on perceived job conditions: A simulation. In Sauter, S. L. and Murphy, L. M. (Eds.), Organizational risk factors for job stress (pp. 341–356). Washington: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Cleckley, H. M. (1976). The mask of sanity: An attempt to clarify some issues about the so-called psychopathic personality. St. Louis: Mosby.Google Scholar
Clark, K. & James, K. (1999). Justice and positive and negative creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 311–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Committee on Science and Technology for Countering Terrorism. (2002). Making the nation safer: The role of science and technology in countering terrorism. Washington: National Research Council/National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Cooper, C. L., Dewe, P. J., & O'Driscoll, M. P. (2001). Organizational stress: A review and critique of theory, research, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), The handbook of creativity (pp. 313–335). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cropanzano, R., James, K., & Citera, M. (1993). A goal-hierarchy model of personality, motivation, and leadership. In Cummings, L. L. and Staw, B. M. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 15, pp. 267–322). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Davis, M. (2009). Understanding the relationship between mood and creativity: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108, 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreu, C. K. W., Baas, M., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). Hedonic tone and activation level in the mood–creativity link: Toward a dual pathway to creativity model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 739–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dollard, M. F. & Winefield, A. H. (1998). A test of the demand-control/support model of work stress in correctional officers. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3, 243–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duffy, M. K., Ganster, D. C., & Pagon, M. (2002). Social undermining in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 331–351.Google Scholar
Eisenberger, R. & Cameron, J. (1996). Detrimental effects of reward: Reality or myth?American Psychologist, 51, 1153–1166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eysenck, H. J. (1995). Genius: The natural history of creativity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Folkman, S., Lazarus, R. S., Dunkel-Schetter, C., DeLongis, A., & Gruen, R. J. (1986). Dynamics of a stressful encounter: Cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 992–1003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forgas, J. P. (1995). Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin, 117, 39–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forgas, J. P. (2000). Affect and information processing strategies: An interactive relationship. In Forgas, J. P. (Ed.), Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition (pp. 253–280). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fritzsche, D. J. & Becker, H. (1984). Linking management behavior to ethical philosophy: An empirical investigation. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 166–275.Google Scholar
Gasper, K., Lozinski, R. H. & LeBeau, L. S. (2009). If you plan, then you can: How reflection helps defensive pessimists pursue their goals. Motivation and Emotion, 33, 203–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giacalone, R. A. & Greenberg, J. (1997). Antisocial behavior in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Goodhart, D. E. (1985). Some psychological effects associated with positive and negative thinking about stressful event outcomes: Was Pollyanna right?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 216–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gough, H. G. (1979). A creative personality scale for the adjective check list. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1398–1405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, J. (1993). Stealing in the name of justice: Informational and interpersonal moderators of theft reactions to underpayment inequity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54, 81–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, J. R. & Bond, S. J. (1981). How social conditions affect creativity. In Hayes, J. R., The complete problem solver (pp. 217–238). Philadelphia: Franklin Institute.Google Scholar
Henle, C. A. (2005). Predicting workplace deviance from the interaction between organizational justice and personality. Journal of Managerial Issues, 17, 247–263.Google Scholar
Hetland, L. (2001). The arts and academic achievement: What the evidence shows. Arts Education Policy Review, 102, 3–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, K. (1995). Goal conflict and individual creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 285–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, K. (2005). Culture and individual and group creativity in organizations. Korean Journal of Thinking and Problem Solving, 15, 77–95.Google Scholar
James, K. & Asmus, C. (2000). Personality, cognitive skills and creativity in different life domains. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 149–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, K., Chen, J., & Goldberg, C. J. (1992). Organizational conflict and individual creativity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 545–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, K. & Clark, K. (2009). Organizational justice effects on positive and negative creativity. Manuscript under review, Portland State University.Google Scholar
James, K., Clark, K., & Cropanzano, R. (1999). Positive and negative creativity in groups, institutions, and organizations: A model and theoretical extension. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 211–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, K. & Drown, D. (2008). Whether “malevolent” or “negative,” creativity is relevant to terrorism prevention: Lessons from 9/11 and hazardous-material trucking. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 120–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Erez, A., Locke, E. A., & Thoresen, C. J. (2002). The scientific merit of valid measures of general concepts: Personality research and core self-evaluations. In Brett, J. M., Jeanne, M. and Drasgow, F. (Eds.), The psychology of work: Theoretically based empirical research (pp. 55–77). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Jung, C. J. (1966). The spirit in man, art, and literature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, G. & Vosburg, S. K. (1997). “Paradoxical” effects of mood on creative problem solving. Cognition and Emotion, 11(2), 151–170.Google Scholar
Kedia, B. K., Keller, R. T., & Julian, S. D. (1992). Dimensions of national culture and the productivity of R&D units. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 3, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, K. H. (2005). Can only intelligent people be creative? A meta-analysis. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16, 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazarus, R. S. (1966). Psychological stress and the coping process. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Lutenberg, J. M. (2005). Negative creativity and psychosomatic diseases. Revista de Psicanaliseda SPPA, 12, 329–353.Google Scholar
Luchins, A. S. & Luchins, E. H. (1959). Rigidity of behavior. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon Books.Google Scholar
Maier, M. & Messerschmidt, J. R. (1998). Commonalities, Conflicts and Contradictions in Organizational Masculinities: Exploring the Gendered Genesis of the Challenger Disaster Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 35, 325–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mar'i, S. K. (1976). Toward a cross-cultural theory of creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 10, 108–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mar'i, S. K. & Karayanni, M. (1983). Creativity in Arab culture: Two decades of research. Journal of Creative Behavior, 16, 227–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, L. L., Ward, D. W., Achee, J. W., & Wyer, R. S. (1993). Mood as input: People have to interpret the motivational implications of their moods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 317–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrae, R. R. & Costa, P. T. Jr. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509–516CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLaren, R. B. (1993). The dark side of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 6, 137–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaren, R. B. (1999). Dark side of creativity. In Runco, M. A. and Pritzker, S. R. (Eds.), The encyclopedia of creativity (pp. 483–491). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and personality, 2nd ed. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Mento, A. J., Steel, R. P., & Karren, R. J. (1987). A meta-analytic study of the effects of goal setting on task performance: 1966–1984. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, 52–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. D. & Lynam, D. (2001). Structural models of personality and their relation to antisocial behavior: A meta-analytic review. Criminology, 39, 765–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mumford, M. D. & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, C. (2003). Human accomplishment: The pursuit of excellence in the arts and sciences, 800 B.C. to 1950. New York: Harper-Collins.Google Scholar
Pervin, E. A. (1983). The stasis and flow of behavior: Toward a theory of goals. In Page, M. M. (Ed.), Personality – Current theory and research: 1982 Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Pervin, L. A. (2001). A dynamic systems approach to personality. European Psychologist, 6, 172–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawsthorne, L. J., &Elliott, A. J. (1999). Achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 326–344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Runco, M. A. (1991). Divergent thinking. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Schneier, B. (2000). Secrets and lies: Digital security in a networked world. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1975). Interdisciplinary creativity over historical time: A correlational analysis of generational fluctuations. Social Behavior and Personality, 3, 181–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwenk, C. A. (1990). Effects of devil's advocacy and dialectical inquiry on decision making: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47, 161–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shalley, C. E. (1991). Effects of productivity goals, creativity goals, and personal discretion on individual creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 179–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shalley, C. E. (1995). Effects of coaction, expected evaluation, and goal setting on creativity and productivity. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 483–503.Google Scholar
Tardif, T. Z. & Sternberg, R. J. (1988). What do we know about creativity? In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 229–240). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tesluk, P. E., Farr, J. L., & Klein, S. R. (1997). Influences of organizational culture and climate on individual creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 31, 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torrance, E. Paul. (1962). Goals for guiding creative talent. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velasquez, M. G. (1982). Business ethics: Concepts and cases. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Vosburg, S. K. (1998). The effects of positive and negative mood on divergent-thinking performance. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 165–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisberg, R. W. (1993). Creativity: Beyond the myth of genius. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14
Cited by

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×