Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-768dbb666b-x9ds4 Total loading time: 0.635 Render date: 2023-02-06T07:33:46.794Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

4 - The ecocultural framework: a stocktaking

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

John W. Berry
Affiliation:
Queen's University, Canada
Fons J. R. van de Vijver
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Tilburg, The Netherlands
Athanasios Chasiotis
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Tilburg, The Netherlands
Seger M. Breugelmans
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Tilburg, The Netherlands
Get access

Summary

This chapter addresses one of the main issues in cross-cultural psychology, and of this book: how can we conceptualise and empirically investigate the relationships between culture and human behaviour? This question assumes that culture and behaviour are distinguishable phenomena, each with a separate existence at its own level; this issue is addressed in this chapter. There is an even more fundamental level, that of the ecological context within which both culture and behaviour are situated and in which they develop. This level will also be addressed, by outlining ecology–culture–behaviour relationships within an ecocultural framework.

The ecological approach to understanding any phenomenon is to examine it in context. These contexts can be naturally occurring or human-made. Essential to this approach are the concepts of interaction and adaptation. Interaction implies reciprocal relationships among elements in an ecosystem; adaptation implies changes in these elements that increase their mutual fit or compatibility. These ideas have a long history in the natural sciences, but have only recently become part of the social and behavioural sciences. Of course, the common criticism of the human sciences following epistemological models from the natural sciences applies here: To what extent can we understand human phenomena using models based on non-human science? No convincing arguments to justify this way of understanding human beings are advanced here.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aberle, D. F., Cohen, A. K., Davis, A. K., Levy, M. J., and Sutton, F. X. (1950). The functional prerequisites of a society. Ethics, 60, 100–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allwood, C. M., and Berry, J. W. (2006). Origins and development of indigenous psychologies: An international analysis. International Journal of Psychology, 41, 243–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, H., Child, I., and Bacon, M. (1959). Relations of child training to subsistence economy. American Anthropologist, 61, 51–63.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. (1976). The ecological transition. London: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Berland, L. (1980). No five fingers are alike: Cultural amplifiers in the social and ecocultural contexts of psychological performance. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Berry, J. W. (1966). Temne and Eskimo perceptual skills. International Journal of Psychology, 1, 207–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, J. W. (1967). Independence and conformity in subsistence-level societies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 415–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, J. W. (1969). On cross-cultural comparability. International Journal of Psychology, 4, 119–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, J. W. (1975). An ecological approach to cross-cultural psychology. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 30, 51–84.Google Scholar
Berry, J. W. (1976). Human ecology and cognitive style: Comparative studies in cultural and psychological adaptation. New York: Sage/Halsted.Google Scholar
Berry, J. W. (1979). A cultural ecology of social behaviour. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 12 (pp. 177–206). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Berry, J. W. (1985). Cultural psychology and ethnic psychology. In Reyes Lagunes, I. and Poortinga, Y. (eds.), From a different perspective (pp. 3–15). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Berry, J. W. (1993). Ecology of individualism and collectivism. In Kim, U., Triandis, H. C., Kağitçibaşi, Ç., Choi, S. and Yoon, G. (eds.), Individualism and collectivism (pp. 77–84). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Berry, J. W. (1994). An ecological approach to cultural and ethnic psychology. In Trickett, E. (ed.), Human diversity (pp. 115–141). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Berry, J. W. (1995). The descendants of a model. Culture and Psychology, 1, 373–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, J. W. (2000). Cross-cultural psychology: A symbiosis of cultural and comparative approaches. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 197–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, J. W.et al. (1997). Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (3 vols.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Berry, J. W., and Bennett, J. A. (1992). Cree conceptions of cognitive competence. International Journal of Psychology, 27, 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, J. W., Bennett, J. A., and Denny, J. P. (2000). Ecology, culture and cognitive processing. Paper presented at the congress of the International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology, Pultusk, Poland.Google Scholar
Berry, J. W., Dasen, P. R., and Witkin, H. A. (1983). Developmental theories in cross-cultural perspective. In Alder, L. (ed.), Cross-cultural research at issue (pp. 13–21). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Berry, J. W., and Irvine, S. H. (1986). Bricolage: Savages do it daily. In Sternberg, R. and Wagner, R. (eds.), Practical intelligence: Nature and origins of competence in the everyday world (pp. 271–306). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Berry, J. W., Irvine, S. H., and Hunt, E. B. (eds.) (1988). Indigenous cognition: Functioning in cultural context. Dordrecht: Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, J. W., Koppel, J. M. H., Sénéchal, C., Annis, R. C., Bahuchet, S., Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., and Witkin, H. A. (1986). On the edge of the forest: Cultural adaptation and cognitive development in Central Africa. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., Segall, M. H., and Dasen, P. R. (2002). Cross-cultural psychology: Research and applications (2nd edn). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bond, R., and Smith, P. (1996). Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 111–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chun, K., Balls-Organista, P., and Marin, G. (eds.) (2002). Acculturation: Advances in theory, measurement, and applied research. Washington, DC: APA Books.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (2000). The architecture of language. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cole, M., Gay, J., Glick, J. A., and Sharp, D. W. (1971). The cultural context of learning and thinking: An exploration in experimental anthropology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Dasen, P. R. (1975). Concrete operational development in three cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 6, 156–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dasen, P. R. (1993). L'Ethnocentrisme de la psychologie. In Rey, M. (ed.), Psychologie clinique et interrogations culturelles (pp. 155–74). Paris: Editions l'Harmattan.Google Scholar
Dasen, P. R., Berry, J. W., and Witkin, H. A. (1979). The use of developmental theories cross-culturally. In Eckensberger, L., Lonner, W. and Poortinga, Y. H. (eds.), Cross-cultural contributions to psychology (pp. 69–82). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Dasen, P. R., and Mishra, R. C. (2010). Development of geocentric spatial language and cognition: An ecocultural perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denny, J. P. (1986). Cultural ecology of mathematics: Ojibway and Inuit hunters. In Closs, M. (ed.), Native American mathematics. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Ember, C., and Ember, M. (1999). Anthropology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Feldman, D. A. (1975). The history of the relationship between environment and culture in ethnological thought. Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences, 110, 67–81.3.0.CO;2-4>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forde, D. (1934). Habitat, economy and society. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
Georgas, J., and Berry, J. W. (1995). An ecocultural taxonomy for cross-cultural psychology. Cross-Cultural Research, 29, 121–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgas, J., Berry, J. W., Vijver, F. J. R., Kağitçibaşi, Ç., and Poortinga, Y. H. (2006). Family structure and function in 30 nations: A psychological study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Georgas, J., Vijver, F. J. R., and Berry, J. W. (2004). The ecocultural framework, ecosocial indices, and psychological variables in cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 74–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goody, J. (1977). The domestication of the savage mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, E. (1945). Mainsprings of civilization. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Jahoda, G. (1995). The ancestry of a model. Culture and Psychology, 1, 11–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kağitçibaşi, Ç. (1996). Family and human development across cultures: A view from the other side. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kardiner, A., and Linton, R. (1939). The individual and his society. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Keller, H., Poortinga, Y. H., and Schölmerich, A. (eds.) (2002). Between culture and biology: Perspectives on ontogenetic development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroeber, A. L. (1917). The superorganic. American Anthropologist, 19, 163–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroeber, A. L. (1939). Cultural and natural areas of native North America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lomax, A., and Berkowitz, W. (1972). The evolutionary taxonomy of culture. Science, 177, 228–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luria, A. R. (1976). Cognitive development: Its cultural and social foundations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mishra, R. C., and Berry, J. W. (2008). Cultural adaptations and cognitive style in Adivasi children in Chotanagphur. In Srinivasan, N., Gupta, A. and Pandey, J. (eds.), Advances in cognitive science (pp. 287–99). New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Mishra, R. C., Dasen, P. R., and Niraula, S. (2003). Ecology, language, and performance n spatial cognitive tasks. International Journal of Psychology, 38, 366–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishra, R. C., Sinha, D., and Berry, J. W. (1996). Ecology, acculturation and psychological adaptation: A study of Advasi in Bihar. Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Murdock, G. P. (1975). Outline of cultural materials. New Haven, CT: Human Relations Area Files.Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. E. (2003). The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently … and why. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Nsamenang, B. (1992). Human development in cultural context. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Pelto, P. (1968). The difference between ‘tight’ and ‘loose’ societies. Transaction, 5, 37–40.Google Scholar
Poortinga, Y. H., and Soudijn, K. A. (2002). Behaviour–culture relationships and ontogenetic development. In Keller, H., Poortinga, Y. H. and Schoelmerich, A. (eds.), Between biology and culture: Perspectives on ontogenetic development (pp. 320–40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sam, D. L., and Berry, J. W. (eds.) (2006). The Cambridge handbook of acculturation psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, D. P., and Allik, J. (2005). Simultaneous administration of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in 53 nations: Exploring the universal and culture-specific features of global self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 89, 623–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Segall, M. H., Dasen, P. R., Berry, J. W., and Poortinga, Y. H. (1999). Human behavior in global perspective: An introduction to cross-cultural psychology (2nd edn). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Sinha, D. (1984). Manual for Story-Pictorial E.F.T. Varanasi: Rupa.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., and Grigorenko, E. L. (2004). Culture and competence: Context of life success. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steward, J. (1955). The concept and method of cultural ecology. Theory of culture change: The methodology of multilinear evolution (pp. 30–42). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Super, C., and Harkness, S. (1986). The developmental niche: A conceptualisation at the interface of childhood and culture. International Journal of Behavioural Development, 9, 545–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Super, C., and Harkness, S. (1997). The cultural structuring of child development. In Berry, J. W., Dasen, P. R. and Saraswathi, T. S. (eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, vol. II: Basic processes and human development (pp. 1–39). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Troadec, B. (2001). Le Modèle écoculturel: Un cadre pour la psychologie culturelle comparative. International Journal of Psychology, 36, 53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisner, T. (1984). A cross-cultural perspective: Ecocultural niches in middle childhood. In Collins, A. (ed.), The elementary school years (pp. 335–69). Washington: Academy Press.Google Scholar
Whiting, B. B., and Whiting, J. W. (1975). Children of six cultures: A psychocultural analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiting, J. W. (1977). A model for psychocultural research. In Liederman, H., Tulkin, S. and Rosenfeld, A. (eds.), Culture and infancy: Variations in the human experience (pp. 29–48). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Witkin, H., and Berry, J. W. (1975). Psychological differentiation in cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 6, 4–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimba, R. (2002). Indigenous conceptions of childhood development and social realities in southern Africa. In Keller, H., Poortinga, Y. H. and Schoelmerich, A. (eds.), Between culture and biology: Perspectives on ontogenetic development (pp. 89–115). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13
Cited by

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×