Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-06T03:09:17.971Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

32 - The continuing idealist tradition

from 9 - The diversity of philosophy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Leslie Armour
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa
Thomas Baldwin
Affiliation:
University of York
Get access

Summary

In the thirty years after 1914, idealist philosophers found themselves divided and uncertain. Many left boxes of unpublished material which record their struggles. Much that remains will prove to be of interest as philosophers return to some of the traditional questions, but much of it is as yet unexplored.

Despite the fact that a concern with language was prominent in the British idealist movement, by the end of this period the movement, along with its realist rival, was eclipsed by a ‘linguistic philosophy’ which was stridently anti-metaphysical in tone. In France the near-idealist philosophie de l'esprit was similarly eased out by existentialism, though Jean Guitton (1939) thought a logical idealist development of Malebranche remained one of the two great philosophical possibilities. In Austria and Germany the idealist tradition continued in the work of the phenomenological movement which flourished alongside the brief flowering of logical positivism; by the end of the period, however, phenomenology itself gave way to Heidegger’s philosophy of being which rejects idealism by affirming the priority of being over thought. Only in Italy did idealism remain the dominant mode of thought, and the conflicting idealist philosophies of Giovanni Gentile and Benedetto Croce were the dominant strands, fascist and liberal, of Italian political thought (idealism also held its own in Canada; see Armour and Trott (1981)).

May Sinclair said (1917: v) that, if you were an idealist philosopher, ‘you [could] not be quite sure whether you [were] putting in an appearance too late or much too early’. Widely circulated arguments had been raised by Bertrand Russell, G. E. Moore, and the American realists against idealism. The idealism they criticised affirmed that mind and its objects form a very close unity, such that the material world cannot be the ultimate reality because its parts are separable and therefore lack the requisite unity. Moore’s counter argument (Moore 1903) was that thinking and perceiving must be separate from their objects.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, S. (1920). Space, Time and Deity, 2 vols., London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Armour, Leslie and Trott, Elizabeth (1981). The Faces of Reason: Philosophy and Culture in English Canada, 1850–1950, Waterloo, Ontario: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.Google Scholar
Ayer, A. J. (1936). Language Truth and Logic, London: Gollancz. 2nd edn 1946, London: Gollancz.Google Scholar
Bhattacharyya, K. C. (1976). The Search for the Absolute in Neo-Vedanta, ed. Burch, G. Bosworth, Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Blanshard, B. (1939). The Nature of Thought, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Bogumil, Gacka (1994). Bibliography of American Personalism, Lublin: Oficyna Wydawnicza, Czas.Google Scholar
Bogumil, Gacka (1995). American Personalism, Lublin: Oficyna Wydawnicza, Czas.Google Scholar
Boodin, J. E. (1921). ‘Notes on Science and Life’, appended to a typescript of an Aristotelian Society Paper read at 21 Gower Street, London, 7 March 1921, Boodin Archive, University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Boodin, J. E. (1925). Cosmic Evolution, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Boodin, J. E. (1934). God: A Cosmic Philosophy of Religion, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Boodin, J. E. (1939). The Social Mind, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, B. (1889). The Philosophical Theory of the State, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, B. (1920). Implication and Linear Inference, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, B. (1923). The Meeting of Extremes in Contemporary Philosophy, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, B. (1934). A History of Aesthetics, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Bowne, B. P. (1908). Personalism, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, F. H. (1893). Appearance and Reality, London: Swan Sonnenschein. 2nd edn 1897 repr. 1969 with a new pagination, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Brightman, E. S. (1930). The Problem of God, New York: Abingdon.Google Scholar
Brightman, E. S. (1940). A Philosophy of Religion, New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Brunschvicg, Léon (1939). La Raison et la religion, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst (1923–96). Philosophie der Symbolischen Formen, Berlin: B. Cassirer, and Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. Trans. 1955–7 Manheim, Ralph, The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms, 4 vols., New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. (1919). ‘Lectures on the Ontological Argument’, Bodleian Modern Manuscripts, Collingwood deposit 2, Film 12/1.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. (1924). Speculum Mentis, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. (1928). Letter to Samuel Alexander July 30, 1928, Alexander Archive, The John Rylands Library, Manchester.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. (1933). ‘Lectures on Ethics’, Bodleian Library Modern Manuscripts, Deposit 8, Film 12/2.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. (1935). Correspondence with Gilbert, Ryle, letter of 9 May, 1935, Bodleian MS. Eng. Lett. d.194.
Collingwood, R. G. (1938a). An Autobiography, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. (1938b). The Principles of Art, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. (1940). An Essay on Metaphysics, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. (1942). The New Leviathan, Oxford: Clarendon Press. 2nd edn ed. Boucher, David 1998, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. (1946). The Idea of History, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Croce, Benedetto (1920). Nuovi Saggi di Estetica (New Essays on Aesthetics), Bari: Laterza and Figli.Google Scholar
Cunningham, G. W. (1933). The Idealistic Argument in Recent British and American Philosophy, New York: Century.Google Scholar
Dray, William (1998). History as Reenactment, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eddington, A. S. (1920). Space, Time and Gravitation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eddington, A. S. (1928). The Nature of the Physical World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eddington, A. S. (1929). Science and the Unseen World, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Eddington, A. S. (1939). The Philosophy of the Physical Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ewing, A. C. (1933). Idealism: A Critical Survey, London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Ewing, A. C. (1957). The Idealist Tradition from Berkeley to Blanshard, Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Flewelling, R. T. (1926). Creative Personality, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Flewelling, R. T. (1935). Letter of March 5, 1934 to Norbert Oldgeering, Catholic University of America, University of Southern California, Flewelling Archive.Google Scholar
Flewelling, R. T. (1952). The Person or the Significance of Man, Los Angeles: Ward Ritchie Press.Google Scholar
Gentile, Giovanni (1920). Teoria Generale Dello Spirito come Atto Puro, third edition, Bari: Laterza and Figli, 1920. Trans. 1922 Carr, H. Wildon, The Theory of Mind as Pure Act, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Guitton, Jean (1939). Le Problème de la connaissance et la pensée religieuse, Paris: Aubier.Google Scholar
Haack, Susan (1993). Evidence and Inquiry: Towards Reconstruction in Epistemology, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Haldane, R. B. (Viscount) (1921). The Reign of Relativity, London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Hocking, W. E. (1912). The Meaning of God in Human Experience, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hocking, W. E. (1940). Living Religions and a World Faith, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hoernlé, R. F. Alfred (1920). Studies in Contemporary Metaphysics, New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Hoernlé, R. F. Alfred (1927). Idealism as a Philosophy, New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Hoernlé, R. F. Alfred (1939). South African Native Policy and the Liberal Spirit, Capetown: University of Capetown Press.Google Scholar
Jeans, James Sir (1930). The Mysterious Universe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. New edn 1937, Harmondsworth: Pelican.Google Scholar
Joseph, H. W. B. (1916). An Introduction to Logic (2nd edn), Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Joseph, H. W. B. (1931). ‘Short Treatise on Propositional Functions’, New College Archives, Oxford, PA/J/2 10/5 (there are two versions of the treatise).Google Scholar
Joseph, H. W. B. (1932). ‘Lectures on Internal and External Relations and the Philosophy of Analysis’ (subtitled inside the notes ‘Lectures on Logical Atomism’), New College Archives, Oxford, PA/J/2 3/3.Google Scholar
Le Senne, René (1930). Le Devoir, Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar
Lodge, R. (1937). The Questioning Mind, New York: E. P. Dutton.Google Scholar
Luce, A. A. (1954). Sense Without Matter, Edinburgh: Nelson.Google Scholar
Marshall, Bruce (1963). The Month of the Falling Leaves, London: Constable.Google Scholar
McTaggart, J. M. E. (1921–7). The Nature of Existence, 2 vols., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Metz, Rudolph (1938). A Hundred Years of British Philosophy, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Meyerson, Emile (1931). Du Cheminement de la pensée, 3 vols. Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. (1903). ‘The Refutation of Idealism’, Mind 12.Google Scholar
Muirhead, J. H. (1931). The Platonic Tradition in Anglo-Saxon Philosophy, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Mure, G. R. G. (1958). Retreat From Truth, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mure, G. R. G. (1978). Idealist Epilogue, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Paton, H. J. (1955). The Modern Predicament: A Study in the Philosophy of Religion, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Radhakrishnan, Sarvepalli (1932). An Idealist View of Life, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sharif, M. M. (1966). In Search of Truth, Lahore: Institute of Islamic Culture.Google Scholar
Sinclair, M. (1917). A Defence of Idealism, New York: Macmillan, p. v.Google Scholar
Smith, J. A. (1914–16).The Hibbert Lectures. The second series of these unpublished essays is in the archives of Magdalen College, Oxford (Magdalen MSS. 1026). There are notes by Collingwood, R. G. in the Bodleian Library, Modern Manuscripts.Google Scholar
Smith, J. A. (1926). Letter of 18 February to Alexander, Samuel, Alexander Archive, John Rylands Library, Manchester.Google Scholar
Smith, J. A. (1929–30). Gifford Lectures. Syllabi and fragments remain in the Magdalen College, Oxford archives (Magdalen MSS. 1026).Google Scholar
Spirito, U. (1974). L'idealismo italiano e suoi critici, 2nd. edn Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Stebbing, L. S. (1937). Philosophy and the Physicists, London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Streeter, B. H. (1927). Reality, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. E. (1932). The Faith of a Moralist, 2 vols., London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Temple, W. (1934). Nature, Man and God, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Watson, J. (1897). Christianity and Idealism, with an introductory essay by Howison, George Holmes, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Watson, J. (1919). The State in Peace and War, Glasgow: Maclehose.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A. N. (1929). Process and Reality, New York: Macmillan and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. Cook (1926). Statement and Inference, ed. Farquharson, A. S. L., 2 vols., Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×