Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home
Civil Rights and the Making of the Modern American State
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 18
  • Cited by
    This book has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Hughey, Matthew W. 2015. The Five I’s of Five-O: Racial Ideologies, Institutions, Interests, Identities, and Interactions of Police Violence. Critical Sociology, Vol. 41, Issue. 6, p. 857.

    Miller, Lisa L 2015. What’s violence got to do with it? Inequality, punishment, and state failure in US politics. Punishment & Society, Vol. 17, Issue. 2, p. 184.

    Jones, Angela 2016. Lessons from the Niagara Movement: Prosopography and Discursive Protest. Sociological Focus, Vol. 49, Issue. 1, p. 63.

    Soss, Joe and Weaver, Vesla 2017. Police Are Our Government: Politics, Political Science, and the Policing of Race–Class Subjugated Communities. Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 20, Issue. 1, p. 565.

    Womack, Autumn M. 2017. “Object Lesson(s)”. Women & Performance: a journal of feminist theory, Vol. 27, Issue. 1, p. 59.

    Tillery, Alvin B. and Walton, Hanes 2017. Presidential greatness in the black press: ranking the modern presidents on civil rights policy and race relations, 1900–2016. Politics, Groups, and Identities, p. 1.

    Espada-Brignoni, Teófilo and Ruiz-Alfaro, Frances 2017. Music as a Platform for Political Communication. p. 52.

    Merseth, Julie Lee 2018. Race-ing solidarity: Asian Americans and support for Black Lives Matter. Politics, Groups, and Identities, Vol. 6, Issue. 3, p. 337.

    Thompson, Debra and Thurston, Chloe 2018. American Political Development in the Era of Black Lives Matter. Politics, Groups, and Identities, Vol. 6, Issue. 1, p. 116.

    Thurston, Chloe N. 2018. Black Lives Matter, American political development, and the politics of visibility. Politics, Groups, and Identities, Vol. 6, Issue. 1, p. 162.

    Nachlis, Herschel 2018. Pockets of Weakness in Strong Institutions: Post-Marketing Regulation, Psychopharmaceutical Drugs, and Medical Autonomy, 1938–1982. Studies in American Political Development, Vol. 32, Issue. 2, p. 257.

    Johnson, Kimberley S. 2018. The neo-Redemption Era? APD in the age of #Black lives matter. Politics, Groups, and Identities, Vol. 6, Issue. 1, p. 120.

    Eckhouse, Laurel 2018. White riot: race, institutions, and the 2016 U.S. election. Politics, Groups, and Identities, p. 1.

    Burge, Camille D. and Johnson, Gbemende 2018. Race, crime, and emotions. Research & Politics, Vol. 5, Issue. 3, p. 205316801879533.

    Thornhill, Chris and Smirnova, Maria 2018. Litigation and political transformation: the case of Russia. Theory and Society, Vol. 47, Issue. 5, p. 559.

    Francis, Megan Ming 2018. The Strange Fruit of American Political Development. Politics, Groups, and Identities, Vol. 6, Issue. 1, p. 128.

    Taylor, Kirstine 2018. American political development and black lives matter in the age of incarceration. Politics, Groups, and Identities, Vol. 6, Issue. 1, p. 153.

    Weinrib, Laura 2019. AGAINST INTOLERANCE: THE RED SCARE ROOTS OF LEGAL LIBERALISM. The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era, p. 1.

    ×

Book description

Did the civil rights movement impact the development of the American state? Despite extensive accounts of civil rights mobilization and narratives of state building, there has been surprisingly little research that explicitly examines the importance and consequence that civil rights activism has had for the process of state building in American political and constitutional development. Through a sweeping archival analysis of the NAACP's battle against lynching and mob violence from 1909 to 1923, this book examines how the NAACP raised public awareness, won over American presidents, and secured the support of Congress. In the NAACP's most far-reaching victory, the Supreme Court ruled that the constitutional rights of black defendants were violated by a white mob in the landmark criminal procedure decision Moore v. Dempsey. This book demonstrates the importance of citizen agency in the making of new constitutional law in a period unexplored by previous scholarship.

Reviews

'Civil Rights and the Making of the Modern American State is an outstanding contribution to the fields of race and politics, American political development, and legal studies. Drawing on rich archival sources, Francis redefines our understanding of the early civil rights movement, the NAACP, and its relationship to the American presidency and Congress. Her research forces us to revise our understanding of the complicated relationships between early twentieth-century presidents and the black movement for racial justice. This work also sharply highlights how social movement organizations tack back and forth between multiple strategies to achieve their goals. Students of American politics, history, legal studies, race and politics, and social movements will all find this a must-read.'

Michael C. Dawson - John D. MacArthur Distinguished Service Professor of Political Science and the College, and Director, Center for the Study of Race, Politics and Culture, University of Chicago

'Civil Rights and the Making of the Modern American State is a singular achievement in the field of American political development. Francis forces us to reconsider the established narrative of how change occurs in America by drawing our attention to the collective, organized work of African Americans resisting the oppression of Jim Crow injustice. This book plumbs the depths of previously understudied archives and offers a beautifully written, rich, historical narrative. Francis tells a new story about the NAACP, the Supreme Court, and, ultimately, our nation. Forget everything you think you know about how change happens.'

Melissa Harris-Perry - Tulane University, Louisiana

'With the publication of this important and original book, Megan Ming Francis establishes herself as an outstanding young scholar of race inequality and the national state. In it, Francis documents the way in which the NAACP came to formulate a litigation strategy to address lynching atrocities, having tried unsuccessfully to mobilize the White House and Congress in this cause. Francis's findings deepen our knowledge of both the civil rights movement and the American state. The book will be influential and should be essential reading for scholars of American politics, history, sociology, and African American studies.'

Desmond King - Andrew Mellon Professor of American Government, University of Oxford

'In this original, incisive, and empirically convincing book, Megan Ming Francis documents how the NAACP's manifold political challenges to racial violence in the early twentieth century contributed to the development of the modern American constitutional state. Along the way, Francis illustrates why historical institutional analysts should grant greater attention to the important roles of organized citizen groups in shaping civil rights law and national legal authority. The book is a brilliant and important achievement.'

Michael McCann - Gordon Hirabayashi Professor for the Advancement of Citizenship, University of Washington

'Francis’s contribution rests on solid, careful scholarship and argumentation that should be widely read and cited.'

Susan D. Carle Source: American Historical Review

'Francis challenges the way scholars have discussed the political and constitutional processes of state-building in the early 20th century by placing the NAACP and ordinary citizens as critical actors in the creation of modern institutional definitions of citizenship. … should be useful to researchers in the fields of African American and United States history considering the impact of black political activism and civil rights organizations … Francis’s study should prove useful in re-conceptualizing how citizenship rights were expanded in the modern American state.'

Samantha Bryant Source: Journal of African American History

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive
  • Send content to

    To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to .

    To send content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
    You are about to send
    ×

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents

Bibliography
Manuscript Collections and Microforms
Link, Arthur, ed., The Papers of Woodrow Wilson, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985.
Court Cases
Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)
Guinn v. United States (1915)
Buchanan v. Warley (1917)
Moore v. Dempsey (1923)
Brown v. Mississippi (1936)
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (1954)
U.S. Government Documents
Congress. Congressional Directory. 67th Congress, 2nd session, December 1921. Washington, DC: GPO, 1921.
Congress. Congressional Directory. 67th Congress, 3rd session, January 1922. Washington, DC: GPO, 1921.
Congress. Senate, Committee on the Judiciary, Report to Accompany H.R. 13, Senate Report No. 837, 67th Congress, 2nd session, December 1921. Washington, DC: GPO, 1921.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed