Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-03T23:33:56.148Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Models Based on Mass Balance Equations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2013

Henry C. Lim
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Hwa Sung Shin
Affiliation:
Inha University, Seoul
Get access

Summary

The cellular behavior in a bioreactor has a complexity unparalleled in chemical reactors and consequently is very difficult to predict from the external bioreactor conditions. Cell growth is highly complex so that a drastic simplification is required before a manageable model can be developed. In many cases, the objective of mathematical model development is explicitly aimed at providing the basis for predicting, controlling, and optimizing the performance of a bioreactor. Mathematical models are indispensable in determining the optimal operating conditions of bioreactors, in particular, fed-batch bioreactors. Nonequation models such as neural network models can be developed and used for optimization purposes when it is not possible to write mass balance equations with appropriate specific rate expressions. However, the results obtained are not as satisfactory as those obtained from equation-based models. Nevertheless, when it is not possible to write one or more mass balance equations and appropriate rate expressions are not possible for key variables, this statistical approach is indispensable.

In general, models can be divided into two classes: phenomenological (unstructured) models and mechanistic (structured) models., Phenomenological models ignore various cellular processes that are involved, including specific enzymes and cellular structural components. These unstructured models are used to describe the overall observed microbial response in terms of readily measurable variables only, and no provision is made for changes in the internal components of the cells. Conversely, structured models are based on the cellular mechanisms and take into account various cellular processes that depend on the activities of enzymes and the structural components such as ribosomes, mitochondria, macromolecular components such as proteins, DNA and RNA, and carbohydrates. An advantage of such highly structured models is the potential for modeling the interrelationship of the metabolic processes and predicting the effects of internal genetic modification and external disturbances on the overall cellular process. The disadvantages of the highly structured models are the difficulty in determining the kinetics and kinetic constants in individual reactions because many of the cellular components are not readily measurable and computational difficulty is posed by a large number of balance equations that result. Although the complex nature of biological systems may require complicated models of large dimension, oversophistication of models should be avoided because it tends to defy the very purpose of modeling by obscuring the essence of the model and makes the prediction of cellular behavior exceedingly difficult.

Type
Chapter
Information
Fed-Batch Cultures
Principles and Applications of Semi-Batch Bioreactors
, pp. 85 - 120
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Frederickson, A. G., Megee, R. D., III, and Tsuchiya, H. M. 1970. Mathematical models of fermentation processes. Advances in Applied Microbiology 13: 419–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatch, R. T. 1982. Annual Reports on Fermentation Processes, ed. Tsao, G. T.Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kossen, N. W. F. 1982. Computer applications in fermentation technology, in Third International Conference on Computer Applications in Fermentation Technology, p. 23. Society of Chemical Industry.Google Scholar
Moreira, A. R., Van Dedem, G., and Moo-Young, M. 1979. Process modeling based on biochemical mechanisms of microbial growth. Biotechnology and Bioengineering Symposium 9: 179–203.Google Scholar
Roels, J. A. 1981. Computer applications in fermentation technology, in Third International Conference on Computer Applications in Fermentation Technology, p. 37. Society of Chemical Industry.Google Scholar
Monod, J. 1942. Recherches sur la croissance des cultures bacteriennes. 2nd ed. Hermann.Google Scholar
Monod, J. 1950. La technique de culture continue; theorie et applications. Annales de L’institut Pasteur 79: 390–410.Google Scholar
Teissier, G. 1942. Croissance des populations bacteriennes et quantite d'alimente disponsible. Revue des Sciences Extrait 3208: 209–231.Google Scholar
Moser, H. 1958. Dynamics of Bacterial Populations Maintained in the Chemostat. Carnegie Institution of Washington.Google Scholar
Jost, J. L., Drake, J. F., Tsuchia, H. M., and Fredrickson, A. G. 1973. Microbial food chains and food webs. Journal of Theoretical Biology 41: 461–484.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shehata, T. E., and Marr, A. G. 1971. Effect of nutrient concentration on the growth of Escherichia coli. Journal of Bacteriology 107: 201–216.Google ScholarPubMed
Ryder, D. N., and Sinclair, C. G. 1972. Model for growth of aerobic microorganisms under oxygen limiting conditions. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 14: 787–798.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Contois, D. 1959. Relationship between population density and specific growth rate of continuous cultures. Journal of General Microbiology 21: 40–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKendrick, A. G., and Pai, M. K. 1911. The rate of multiplication of microorganisms: A mathematical study. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Edinburgh 31: 649–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cui, Q., and Lawson, G. J. 1982. Study on models of single populations: An expansion of the logistic and exponential equation. Journal of Theoretical Biology 98: 645–659.Google Scholar
Frame, K. K., and Hu, W. S. 1988. A model for density-dependent growth of anchorage-dependent mammalian cells. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 32: 1061–1066.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andrews, J. F. 1968. A mathematical model for the continuous culture of microorganisms utilizing inhibitory substrates. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 10: 707–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agrawal, P., Lee, C., Lim, H. C., and Ramkrishna, D. 1982. Theoretical investigations of dynamic behavior of isothermal continuous stirred tank biological reactors. Chemical Engineering Science 37: 453–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aiba, S., Shoda, M., and Nagatani, M. 1968. Kinetics of product inhibition in alcohol fermentation. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 10: 845–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aiba, S., and Shoda, M. 1969. Reassessment of the product inhibition in alcohol fermentation. Journal of Fermentation Technology 47: 790–794.Google Scholar
Levenspiel, O. 1980. The Monod equation: A visit and a generalization to product inhibition situations. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 22: 1671–1687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leudeking, R., and Piret, E. L. 1959. A kinetic study of the lactic acid fermentation. Journal of Biochemistry and Microbiological Technology and Engineering 1: 393–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaden, L., Jr. 1959. Fermentation process kinetics. Journal of Biochemistry and Microbiology Technology and Engineering 1: 413–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbert, D. 1959. Continuous culture of microorganisms: Some theoretical aspects, in Recent Progress in Microbiology, VII International Congress for Microbiology, ed. Tunevall, G., p. 381. Almquist and Wiksell.Google Scholar
Marr, A. G., Nilson, E. H., and Clark, D. J. 1963. The maintenance requirement of Escherichia coli. Annals of the New York Academy of Science 102: 536–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirt, S. J. 1966. The maintenance requirement of bacteria in growing culture. Proceedings of the Royal Society, B 163: 224–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramkrishna, D., Frederickson, A. G., and Tsuchiya, H. 1966. Dynamics of microbial propagation: Models considering endogenous metabolism. Journal of General and Applied Microbiology 12: 311–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclaire, G., and Topiwala, H. H. 1970. Model for continuous culture which considers the viability concept. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 12: 1069–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Astrom, K. J., and Eykoff, P. 1971. System identification – a survey. Automatica 7: 123–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soderstrom, T. L., and Gustavsson, I. 1978. A theoretical analysis of recursive identification methods. Automatica 14: 231–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chittur, V. K. 1989. Modeling and optimization of the fed-batch penicillin fermentation. PhD dissertation, Purdue University.
Gelb, A. 1974. Applied Optimal Estimation. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jazwinski, A. H. 1970. Stochastic Processes and Filtering Theory. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sorenson, H. W. 1985. Kalman Filtering Theory: Theory and Practice. IEEE Press.Google Scholar
Steiner, E. C., Blau, G. E., and Agin, G. L. 1986. SIMUSOLV – Modeling and Simulation Software. Mitchell and Gauthier Associates.Google Scholar
Burt, C. J. 1989. SIMUSOLV: A new code for modeling and optimization. CACHE News 29: 13–16.Google Scholar
Kalman, R. E. 1960. A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. Transactions of the ASME – Journal of Basic Engineering 82: 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nihtilä, M., and Virkkunen, J. 1977. Practical identifiability of growth and substrate consumption models. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 19: 1831–1850.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weigand, W. A., Lim, H. C., Creagan, C., and Mohler, R. 1979. Optimization of a repeated fed-batch reactor for maximum cell productivity. Biotechnology and Bioengineering Symposium 9: 335–348.Google Scholar
Lim, H. C., Tayeb, I. J., Modak, J. M., and Bonte, P. 1986. Computational algorithms for optimal feed rates for a class of fed-batch fermentation: Numerical results for penicillin and cell mass production. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 28: 1408–1420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ohno, H., Nakanishi, E., and Takamatsu, T. 1976. Optimal control of a semi-batch fermentation. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 18: 847–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aiba, S., Shoda, M., and Nagatani, M. 1968. Kinetics of product inhibition in alcohol fermentation. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 10: 845–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bajpai, R. K., and Reuss, M. 1981. Evaluation of feeding strategies in carbon-regulated secondary metabolite production through mathematical modeling. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 23: 717–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, J. M. 1996. On-line adaptive optimization of fed-batch fermentations. PhD dissertation, University of California, Irvine.
Park, S., and Ramirez, W. F. 1988. Optimal production of secreted protein in fed-batch reactors. American Institute of Chemical Engineering Journal 34: 1550–1558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pazlarová, J., Baig, M. A., and Votruba, J. 1984. Kinetics of α-amylase production in a batch and fed-batch culture of Bacillus subtilis with caseinate as nitrogen source and starch as carbon source. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 20: 331–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. H., Lim, H. C., and Hong, J. 1997. Application of non-singular transformation to on-line optimal control of poly-β-hydroxybutyrate fermentation. Journal of Biotechnology 55: 135–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Tremblay, M., Chavarie, C., and Archambault, J. 1992. Optimization of fed-batch culture of hybridoma cells using dynamic programming: single and multi feed cases. Bioprocess Engineering 7: 292–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cagney, J. W. 1984. Experimental investigation of a differential state model for fed-batch penicillin fermentation. PhD dissertation, Purdue University.
Topiwala, H., and Sinclair, C. C. 1971. Temperature relationship in continuous culture. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 13: 795–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozzi, A. 1984. Modeling and control of anaerobic digestion processes. Transactions of the Institute of Measurements and Control 6: 153–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, J. V., and Edwards, V. H. 1975. Kinetics of substrate inhibition of exponential yeast growth. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 17: 943–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, V. H. 1970. The influence of high substrate concentrations on microbial kinetics. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 12: 679–712.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ming, F., Howell, J. A., and Canovas-Diaz, M. 1988. Mathematical simulation of anaerobic stratified fermentation technology, in Computer Applications and Fermentation Technology: Modeling and Control of Biotechnological Processes, p. 69–77. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Sokol, W., and Howell, J. A. 1981. Kinetics of phenol oxidation by washed cells. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 23: 2039–2049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staniskis, J., and Levisauskias, D. 1984. Adaptive control algorithm for fed-batch culture. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 26: 419–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kishimoto, M., Sawano, T., Yoshida, T., and Taguchi, T. 1983. Optimization of a fed-batch culture by statistical data analysis, in Modelling and Control of Biotechnical Processes, ed. Halme, A., p. 161. Permagon.Google Scholar
Verhulst, P. F. 1838. Notice sur la loi que la population suit dans son accroissement. Correspondance Mathématique et Physique. 10: 113–121.Google Scholar
Arndt, M., and Hitzmann, B. 2004. Kalman filter based glucose control at small set points during fed-batch cultivation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnology Progress 20: 377–387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patkar, A. Y. 1960. Kinetics, modeling and optimization of recombinant yeast fermentations. PhD dissertation, Purdue University.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×