Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of contributors
- Introduction
- PART 1 Setting the stage
- PART 2 Explanation of cross-cultural differences
- 2 Past and present of cross-cultural psychology
- 3 The continuing challenge of discovering psychological ‘order’ across cultures
- 4 The ecocultural framework: a stocktaking
- 5 Frameworks for explaining cross-cultural variance: a meta-analytic examination of their usefulness
- 6 The relationship between individual and culture
- PART 3 Methods for studying culture
- PART 4 The role of development
- PART 5 Concepts of culture
- PART 6 Conclusion
- Index
- References
2 - Past and present of cross-cultural psychology
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of contributors
- Introduction
- PART 1 Setting the stage
- PART 2 Explanation of cross-cultural differences
- 2 Past and present of cross-cultural psychology
- 3 The continuing challenge of discovering psychological ‘order’ across cultures
- 4 The ecocultural framework: a stocktaking
- 5 Frameworks for explaining cross-cultural variance: a meta-analytic examination of their usefulness
- 6 The relationship between individual and culture
- PART 3 Methods for studying culture
- PART 4 The role of development
- PART 5 Concepts of culture
- PART 6 Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
Why old history?
Apart from the fact that it is interesting, history in my opinion also has some lessons for us. Before the modern age of increasing specialisation, people from a rich variety of backgrounds were concerned with what we now call problems of culture. The list includes philosophers, travellers and explorers, missionaries, historians, mathematicians and so on. When posing questions and seeking for answers they learned from each other, which in a broad and rather ill-defined sphere like that of culture is still very important. Admittedly their views tended to be speculative, but they should not be dismissed on that account. They were arrived at by inferences from the imperfect information at their disposal, a problem that has by no means disappeared.
When empirical methods came to be developed, much earlier than is generally realised, there remained the issue of bridging the gap between the relatively limited facts ascertained and their wider ramifications. For instance, during the nineteenth century many scholars entered a blind alley when they attributed human differences to race, and were convinced that they had empirically demonstrated this by means of craniology. Can we be certain that some of our own efforts will not in future come to be regarded in a similarly disparaging manner? So history teaches us humility, as well as providing a wider perspective enabling us to see our own contributions in the context of a larger canvas.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Fundamental Questions in Cross-Cultural Psychology , pp. 37 - 63Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2011
References
, , , , , , and (2007). Two decades of change in cultural values and economic development in eight East Asian and Pacific Island nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 247–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (1959). Relation of child training to subsistence economy. American Anthropologist, 61, 51–63.Google Scholar
(1995). The descendants of a model: Comments on Jahoda (1995). Culture and Psychology, 3, 373–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997). Preface. In , and (eds.), Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology (vol. I, pp. x–xv). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
, , , , et al. (1990). Mother and infant activity and interaction in Japan and in the United States. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 13, 289–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and (2004). A historical analysis of empirical studies published in The Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. The Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 251–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007). Between orientalism and normalization: Cross-cultural lessons from Japan for a critical history of psychology. History of Psychology, 10, 179–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (eds.) (2005). Social neuroscience: Key readings. New York: Psychology Press.
(1873/1965). The expression of emotions in man and animals. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1980). Perception. In and (eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (vol.III, pp. 21–115). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
(2008). Epilog. Dank – Ruckblick – Diskussion. In , and (eds.), Kultur – Handlung – Demokratie. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.Google Scholar
, , and (1996). Individualism–collectivism: An empirical study of a conceptual issue. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27, 381–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1585/1998). Européens et Japonais: Traité sur les contradictions et différences de mœurs. Paris: Chandeigne.Google Scholar
(2004). Culture, power, and experience: Toward a person-centered cultural psychology. Human Development, 47, 138–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1977). Weaving, color terms and pattern representation: Cultural influences and cognitive development among the Zinacantecos of Southern Mexico. Inter-American Journal of Psychology, 11, 23–48.Google Scholar
, , , , , and (2004). Foundations of human sociality. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2010). The weirdest people in the world?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
(2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
(1969). Understanding the mechanism of bicycles: A cross-cultural study of developmental change after 13 years. International Journal of Psychology, 4, 103–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993). The colour of a chameleon: Perspectives on concepts of ‘culture’. Cultural Dynamics, 6, 277–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1997). History of cross-cultural and cultural psychology. In , and (eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (vol. I, pp. 1–42). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
, and (eds.) (1995). Handbook of experimental economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
(1997). Individualism and collectivism. In , and (eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (vol. III, pp. 1–49). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
, and (1952). Culture: A critical review of concepts and definitions. Cambridge, MA: Peabody Museum, vol. 47, no. 1.Google Scholar
, and (1917). Binet tests on South African natives – Zulus. Pedagogical Seminary, 24, 373–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , , , and (2007). Kinship and altruism: A cross-cultural experimental study. British Journal of Psychology, 98, 339–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2003). Dialogicality and social representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1915). Experiments with Binet-Simon tests upon African children, chiefly Kaffirs. Training School Bulletin, 12, 122–3.Google Scholar
, and (1977). Land, labor and the child's cognitive performance among the Logoli. American Ethnologist, 4, 309–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1901). Smell: Reports of the Cambridge Anthropological Expedition to Torres Strait (vol. II, Part II, pp. 169–85). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1939). The application of intelligence tests in the anthropological field. In , , and (eds.), The study of society: Methods and problems. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner.Google Scholar
(2001). Historicization of the culture concept. History and Anthropology, 12, 213–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1954). L'exploration de la mentalité des Noirs congolais au moyen d'une épreuve projective: Le Congo T.A.T. Brussels: Institut Royal Colonial Belge.Google Scholar
. (1914–30). The life, letters and labours of Francis Galton (3 vols.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1928/1995). Genetic logic and sociology. In (ed.), Sociological studies (pp. 184–214). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(1996). Indigenous psychology: Scientific ethnocentrism in a new guise? In , and (eds.), Asian contributions to cross-cultural psychology. New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
(1997). Towards convergence. In , and (eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (vol. I, pp. 347–87). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
(1917). Mental tests with delinquents and Australian Aboriginal children. Psychological Review, 24, 32–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1901). Introduction and vision. Reports of the Cambridge Anthropological Expedition to Torres Strait, vol. II, part I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
, , and (1966). The influence of culture on visual perception. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merill.Google Scholar
(1999). Debating self, identity, and culture in anthropology. Current Anthropology, 40, 417–47.Google Scholar
, , , and (2008). Brain wave concomitants of cross-cultural differences in scores on simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39, 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2008). Are Japanese more collectivist than Americans?Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39, 237–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003). Culture as a semiosphere: On the role of culture in the culture–individual relationship. In (ed.), Dialogicality in development (pp. 129–63). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
(1980). Introduction. In and (eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (vol. I, pp. 1–14). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
(1990). Cross-cultural studies of individualism and collectivism. In and (eds.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 1989 (pp. 41–133). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
(1889). On a method of investigating the development of institutions. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 18, 245–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(ed.) (2006). Bridging social psychology: Benefits of transdisciplinary approaches. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- 8
- Cited by