Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T22:52:44.512Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Advanced Naval Vehicles Concepts Evaluation (ANVCE) Project

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2015

Get access

Summary

It is better to know some of the questions than all of the answers.

James Thurber, 1894–1961

I do not understand; I pause; I examine.

Michel Eyquem de Montaigne, 1533–1592

The two decade period 1960–1980 was the crucial period in the US where first, the US Maritime Administration (MARAD) and second, the US Navy sought large ships capable of operating at 100 knots on the high seas for both economic and military advantage. During that two decade period there were two key review milestones when the then current Administration became nervous about the choice of concept and called for a re-evaluation of the MARAD and US Navy choice. The first occurred in 1965 when the US Department of Commerce directed that a re-evaluation be made of the many high speed ship concepts available. This was the Surface Effect Ships for Ocean Commerce (SESOC) Committee. The results of that committee's work are discussed in detail in Chapter 4.

The second “call for a re-evaluation” was in 1975, exactly one decade later, when the Office of the Secretary of Defense called for a major review because after a decade of development, the choice by the US Navy was not performing as advertised. This resulted in the US Navy's Advanced Naval Vehicles Concepts Evaluation (ANVCE) Project (1976–1979). The ANVCE Project wrapped up its work and published its findings just before the US Navy canceled the high speed SES program on 9 January 1980. This chapter outlines the results from the ANVCE Project.

On 30 June 1976, the sidehull Surface Effect Ship SES-100B attained a speed of 91.9 knots in a slight choppy sea off the coast of Panama City, Florida. Despite that achievement many in the technical community and in The Pentagon were becoming concerned that the claims of the “100 knot Navy” advocates simply did not hold water. The technological problems that were surfacing based on analysis and test and operational experience both in the US and in the UK (where hovercraft technology and operation was quite advanced) produced “red flags” about the viability in several key areas of technical maturity in the US Navy choice. At the same time, the issue of the form of the proper Navy mission requirements was also raising questions in the Defense and Congressional community.

Type
Chapter
Information
High-Speed Marine Craft
One Hundred Knots at Sea
, pp. 411 - 500
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Meeks, Capt Thomas L. USN and Mantle, Peter J., “The Advanced Naval Vehicles Concepts Evaluation”, AIAA/SNAME Advanced Marine Vehicles Conference, Paper No. 76–846, 20–22 September 1976
2. Mantle, Peter J., “Advanced Concepts for Sea Control”, SAE Paper No. 770966, SAE Aerospace Meeting, Los Angeles, California, 14–17 November 1977
3. Meeks, Capt Thomas L., Cdr Clark Graham USN and Hu, Richard C., “Combat Systems for the Advanced Naval Vehicles Concepts Evaluation”, Naval Engineers Journal, Vol 90, No. 5; October 1978
4. “Advanced Naval Vehicles Concepts Evaluation (ANVCE) Project”, Prepared by Chief of Naval Operations (OP-96), Report No. CNO LTR 96/C194136, Vols 1,2,3,4; December 1979
5. Crewe, Peter R. et al, “Analysis of Acceleration and Pressure Measurements on the SR.N1”, Hydrodynamics Note PRC/DGG/MFKi/3823, Saunders Roe Ltd, November 1960Google Scholar
6. British Hovercraft Safety Requirements, published by Civil Aviation Authority, April 1972
7. “Wingship Investigation”, Final Report, Vol 1,2,3 published by Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA), 30 September 1994
8. Smiley, Robert F., “Water Pressure Distributions During Landings of Prismatic Model Having an Angle of Deadrise of 22.5°”, NACA Tech Note 2816, November 1952Google Scholar
9. Heller, S.R. and Clark, D.J., “The Outlook For Lighter Structures in High Performance Marine Vehicles”, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics/Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers Advanced Marine Vehicles Conference, AIAA Paper 74–330, 25–27 February 1974
10. “Ship Work Breakdown Structure (SWBS)”, by the Naval Ship Systems Command, NAVSHIPS 0900-039-9010, March 1973
11. Osborne, W.C., “Fans”, Pergammon Press, London, England, 1966Google Scholar
12. Shipway, J.C., “Estimation of Head-Flow Curves for Centrifugal Fans”, National Physical Laboratory Report, Hovercraft Report 5. October 1968Google Scholar
13. Wallis, R.A., “Axial Flow Fans”, Newnes Academic Press, London, England (1961)Google Scholar
14. Shipway, J.C., “Aerodynamic Design of Axial Lift Fans”, National Physical Laboratory Report, Hovercraft Report 4, July 1968Google Scholar
15. Baljé, O.E., “A Study on Design Criteria and Matching of Turbomachines, Part A: Similarity Relations and Design Criteria of Turbines”, American Society of Mechanical Engineers Paper 60-WA-230 (1960)Google Scholar
16. Cordier, O., “Ahnligkeitsbedingungen Fϋr Strömungsmaschinen”, VDI Berichte, Vol 3, pp85–88 (1955)Google Scholar
17. “Study of Skirt Design Concepts for Large ACV's with High Speed Potential”, Report No. AGC-T-596, Aerojet General Corporation, December 1976
18. “Study of Large ACV Skirt Design Concepts”, Report No. 7588–950048, Bell Aerospace Textron, 31 January 1977
19. “Air-Propelled Air Cushion Vehicles”, Report No. P61/7701, Vosper-Thornycroft Ltd, March 1977
20. “SES Lift Systems”, Hovermarine Corporation, Report to ANVCE Project Office, December 1976
21. “SES Skirt Systems”, Hovermarine Corporation, Report to ANVCE Project Office, March 1977
22. O'Hanlon, J.F. and McCauley, M.E., “Motion Sickness Incidence as a Function of the Frequency and Acceleration of Vertical Sinusoidal Motion”, Human Factors Research, Inc., Technical Report 1733–1, September 1973
23. “Guide for Evaluation of Human Exposure to Whole Body Vibration”, International Standard Organization (ISO), Document ISO/DIOS 2631, 1972
24. Eggington, W. and Kobitz, Nat, “The Domain of the Surface Effect Ship”, Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers Annual Meeting, Paper 11, November 1975
25. Mantle, P.J., “Advanced Naval Surface Vehicles for AD 2000”, Joint DDR&E – Intelligence Community Technology Trends Colloquium, US Naval Academy, Annapolis, 29 March–1 April 1978Google Scholar
26. Schertel, Baron von, Surface Piercing Hydrofoils and Other Hydrofoil Systems, Supramar, AG, Report to ANVCE Project Office (1976)
27. Lewis, Edward V., “The Influence of Sea Conditions On the Speed of Ships”, American Society of Naval Engineers (ASNE) Journal, Vol 67, Issue 2, pp303–319, May 1955Google Scholar
28. Lewis, Edward V., “Research Towards More Efficient Transportation by Sea”, Trans. Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers (SNAME), Vol 69, 1961Google Scholar
29. Payne, Peter R., “A New Type of Hydrofoil”, Paper presented at Small Craft Marine Engineering Resistance & Propulsion Symposium, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 15–17 May 1996
30. “High Speed Boat with Planing Hull”, inventor Payne, Peter R., US Patent No. 3,763,810 Filed 24 March 1972, Issued 9 October 1973
31. Hammond, M.A. and Nicholson, K., “Sea Knife Analysis of Selected Seakeeping Data, Vol 1”, Admiralty Experiment Works, Haslar Report, Gosport, Hants, UK, November 1976Google Scholar
32. Payne, Peter R., “Supercritical Planing Hulls”, Ocean Engineering, Vol 11, No.2, pp129–184, 1984
33. “Point Design for 3000-Ton Air Cushion Vehicle”, Bell Aerospace Textron Report 7588–950049, 31 January 1977
34. “The Specialist Committee on Waves”, Proceedings of the 23rd International Towing Tank Conference (ITTC), Venice Italy, September 2002
35. National Weather Service, Ocean Prediction Center, www.opc.ncep.noaa.gov
36. Krause, Fred H., “Evaluation of a Power-Augmented-Ram Wing Operating Free in Heave and Pitch Over Water”, US Navy DTNSRDC ASED Report 385, August 1977Google Scholar
37. Appendix: Wing-in-Ground-Effect Vehicles by Kehoe, James W. to Chapter VI: The Surface Effect Ship by Butler, Edward A., Modern Ships and Craft, Naval Engineers Journal, Special Edition, February 1985
38. “Wingship Investigation”, Final Report, published by Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA), now Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), Arlington, Virginia, September 1994
39. “Surface Effect Ships for Ocean Commerce (SESOC), Final Report on a Study of the Technological Problems”, by the SESOC Advisory Committee, issued by US Department of Commerce and published by US Government Printing Office, February 1966
40. Sheets, H.E. and Mantle, P.J., “Air Cushion Craft Propulsion”, AIAA/US Navy Second Marine Systems and ASW Conference, AIAA Paper 66–731, 8–10 August 1966. See also AIAA Journal of Aircraft, Vol 4, No. 3, p.237–244, May-June 1967
41. Gabrielli, Giuseppe and von Karman, Theodore, “What price Speed?”, Mechanical Engineering, October 1950 Issue.Google Scholar
42. “Surface Effect Ships for Ocean Commerce (SESOC), Final Report on a Study of the Technological Problems”, by the SESOC Advisory Committee, issued by US Department of Commerce and published by US Government Printing Office, February 1966

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×