Achinstein, P. 1983a. The Nature of Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Achinstein, P., ed. 1983b. The Concept of Evidence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Adorno, T., ed. 1969. Der Positivismussstreit in der Deutschen Soziologie. Darmstadt: Hermann Luchterhand Verlag.Google Scholar

Ahonen, G. 1989. “On the Empirical Content of Keynes’ General Theory.” Richerche Economiche 43: 256–69.Google Scholar

Akerlof, G. 1970. “The Market for ‘Lemons’: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 84: 488–500.Google Scholar

Akerlof, G. 1980. “A Theory of Social Custom, of Which Unemployment May Be One Consequence.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 94: 749–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Akerlof, G. 1982. “Labor Contracts as Partial Gift Exchange.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 97: 543–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Akerlof, G. 1984a. An Economic Theorist’s Book of Tales. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Akerlof, G. 1984b. “Gift Exchange and Efficiency-Wage Theory: Four Views.” American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings 74: 79–83.Google Scholar

Akerlof, G. 1985. “Discriminatory, Status-Based Wages among Tradition-Oriented, Stochastically Trading Coconut Producers.” Journal of Political Economy 93: 265–76.Google Scholar

Akerlof, G. and Dickens, W.. 1982. “The Economic Consequences of Cognitive Dissonance.” American Economic Review 72: 307–19.Google Scholar

Akerlof, G. and Yellen, J.. 1985. “Can Small Deviations from Rationality Make Significant Differences to Economic Equilibria?” American Economic Review 75: 708–20.Google Scholar

Akerlof, G. A. and Yellen, J. L.. 1990. “The Fair Wage-Effort Hypothesis and Unemployment.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 105: 255–83.Google Scholar

Akerlof, G. A. and Kranton, R. E.. 2005. “Identity and the Economics of Organizations.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 19 (1): 9–32.Google Scholar

Alchian, A. 1950. “Uncertainty, Evolution and Economic Theory.” Journal of Political Economy 57: 211–21.Google Scholar

Allais, M. 1947. Economie et Intèrêt. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.Google Scholar

Allais, M. 1952. “The Foundations of a Positive Theory of Choice Involving Risk and a Criticism of the Postulates and Axioms of the American School,” in Allais, and Hagen, , eds. (1979), pp. 27–145.Google Scholar

Allais, M. and Hagen, O., eds. 1979. Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar

Alós-Ferrer, C., Granic ́, D., Kern, J., and Wagner, A.. 2016. “Preference Reversals: Time and Again.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 52: 65–97. doi: 10.1007/s11166-016-9233-z.Google Scholar

Alvard, M. S. 2004. “The Ultimatum Game, Fairness, and Cooperation among Big Game Hunters,” in Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., and Gintis, H., eds. Foundations of Human Sociality. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 413–35.Google Scholar

Ando, A. and Modigliani, F.. 1963. “The Life-Cycle Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate Implications and Tests.” American Economic Review 53: 55–84.Google Scholar

Angrist, J. 1990. “Lifetime Earnings and the Vietnam Era Draft Lottery: Evidence from Social Security Administrative Records.” American Economic Review 80: 313–36.Google Scholar

Anschutz, R. 1953. The Philosophy of J. S. Mill. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Anscombe, E. 1969. Intentionality. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Anscombe, E. 1981. “The Intentionality of Sensation: A Grammatical Feature,” in Anscombe, G., ed. Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Mind. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 3–20.Google Scholar

Archibald, G. 1959. “The State of Economic Science.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10: 58–69.Google Scholar

Archibald, G. 1961. “Chamberlin versus Chicago.” Review of Economic Studies 29: 2–28.Google Scholar

Archibald, G. 1967. “Refutation or Comparison?” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 17: 279–96.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1958. “Physics,” translated by R. Hardie and R. Gaye, The Pocket Aristotle. Repr. New York: Washington Square Press, pp. 2–47.Google Scholar

Aronson, E. 1979. The Social Animal. 3rd ed. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar

Arrow, K. 1959. “Rational Choice Functions and Ordering.” Econometrica 26: 121–27.Google Scholar

Arrow, K. 1963. Social Choice and Individual Values. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Arrow, K. 1967. “Values and Collective Decision Making.” Repr. in Hahn, and Hollis, (1979), pp. 110–26.Google Scholar

Arrow, K. 1970. Essays in the Theory of Risk Bearing. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar

Arrow, K. 1978. “Extended Sympathy and the Possibility of Social Choice.” Philosophia 7: 223–37.Google Scholar

Arrow, K. and Hahn, F.. 1971. General Competitive Analysis. San Francisco: Holden-Day.Google Scholar

Ashlagi, I. and Roth, A.. Kidney Exchange: An Operations Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Faculty & Research Publications, September 21, 2021. www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=61163.Google Scholar

Asimakopulos, A. 1967. “The Pure Consumption-Loan Model Once More.” Journal of Political Economy 75: 763–4.Google Scholar

Aumann, R. 1964. “Markets with a Continuum of Traders.” Econometrica 32: 39–50.Google Scholar

Ausubel, L. 1991. “The Failure of Competition in the Credit Card Market.” American Economic Review 81: 50–81.Google Scholar

Ayer, A. 1936. Language, Truth and Logic. 2nd ed. Repr. New York: Dover, 1946.Google Scholar

Ayer, A., ed. 1959. Logical Positivism. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Backhouse, R. 2007. Explorations in Economic Methodology: From Lakatos to Empirical Philosophy of Science. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Backhouse, R. 2012. “The Rise and Fall of Popper and Lakatos in Economics,” in Mäki, U., ed. Handbook of the Philosophy of Science. Volume 13: Philosophy of Economics. London: Routledge, pp. 25–48.Google Scholar

Baker, C. 1975. “The Ideology of the Economic Analysis of Law.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 5: 3–48.Google Scholar

Balzer, W. and Hamminga, B., eds. 1989. Philosophy of Economics. Dordrecht: Kluwer-Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Barro, R. 1974. “Are Government Bonds Net Wealth?” Journal of Political Economy 82: 1095–117.Google Scholar

Baumberger, J. 1977. “No Kuhnian Revolutions in Economics.” Journal of Economic Issues 11: 1–20.Google Scholar

Bear, D. and Orr, D.. 1967. “Logic and Expediency in Economic Theorizing.” Journal of Political Economy 75: 188–96.Google Scholar

Becker, G. 1962. “Irrational Behavior and Economic Theory.” Journal of Political Economy 70: 1–13.Google Scholar

Becker, G. 1976. The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Becker, G. 1981. A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Becker, G., deGroot, M., and Marschak, J.. 1964. “Measuring Utility by a Single-Response Sequential Method.” Behavioral Science 9: 226–32.Google Scholar

Begg, D. 1982. The Rational Expectations Revolution in Macroeconomics: Theories and Evidence. Baltimore: Johns-Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Bell, D. and Kristol, I., eds. 1981. The Crisis in Economic Theory. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Bellemare, C. and Shearer, B.. 2011. “On the Relevance and Composition of Gifts within the Firm: Evidence from Field Experiments.” International Economic Review 52: 855–82.Google Scholar

Bentham, J. 1789. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (1789), Harrison, W., ed. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1967.Google Scholar

Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., and O’Brien, J.. 1985. “Preference Reversal and Arbitrage,” in Smith, V., ed. Research in Experimental Economics, vol. 3. Greenwich: JAI Press, pp. 31–72.Google Scholar

Bergmann, B. 1989. “Does the Market for Women’s Labor Need Fixing?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 3: 43–60.Google Scholar

Bewley, T. 2007. General Equilibrium, Overlapping Generations Models, and Optimal Growth Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bicchieri, C. 1988. “Should a Scientist Abstain from Metaphor?” in Klamer, et al., eds. (1988), pp. 100–14.Google Scholar

Binmore, K. 1994. Playing Fair. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Boadway, R. 2016. “Cost-Benefit Analysis.” In Adler, Matthew and Fleurbaey, Marc, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Well-Being and Public Policy. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 47–81.Google Scholar

Boardman, A., Greenberg, D., Vining, A., and Weimer, D.. 2010. Cost-Benefit Analysis. 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Broome, J. 1991a. “Utility.” Economics and Philosophy 7: 1–12.Google Scholar

Broome, J. 1991b. Weighing Goods. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Bykvist, K. 2016. “Preference-Based Views of Well-Being.” In Adler, and Fleurbaey, , eds., pp. 321–47.Google Scholar

Binmore, K. 1987. “Modeling Rational Players: Part I.” Economics and Philosophy 3: 179–214.Google Scholar

Binmore, K. 1988. “Modeling Rational Players: Part II.” Economics and Philosophy 4: 9–56.Google Scholar

Blanchard, O. 1985. “Debt, Deficits, and Finite Horizons.” The Journal of Political Economy 93: 223–47.Google Scholar

Blaug, M. 1976. “Kuhn versus Lakatos or Paradigms versus Research Programmes in the History of Economics,” in Latsis, , ed. (1976), pp. 149–80.Google Scholar

Blaug, M. 1980a. The Methodology of Economics: Or How Economists Explain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Blaug, M. 1980b. A Methodological Appraisal of Marxian Economics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar

Blaug, M. 1985. “Comment on D. Wade Hand’s ‘Karl Popper and Economic Methodology: A New Look.’” Economics and Philosophy 1: 286–9.Google Scholar

Blaug, M. 1987. “Second Thoughts on the Keynesian Revolution,” Mimeograph English version of “Ripensamenti Sulla Rivoluzione Keynesiana.” Rassegna Economica 51: 605–34.Google Scholar

Blaug, M. and de Marchi, N., eds. 1991. Appraising Modern Economics: Studies in the Methodology of Scientific Research Programs. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Bleichrodt, H. and Pinto Prades, J. L.. 2009. “New Evidence of Preference Reversals in Health Utility Measurement.”Health Economics 18: 713–26.Google Scholar

Blinder, A. 1974. “The Economics of Brushing Teeth.” Journal of Political Economy 82: 887–91.Google Scholar

Blinder, A. and Choi, D.. 1990. “A Shred of Evidence on Theories of Wage Stickiness.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 105: 1003–15.Google Scholar

Bliss, C. 1975. Capital Theory and the Distribution of Income. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar

Blount, S. 1995. “What Social Outcomes Aren’t Fair: The Effect of Causal Attributions on Preferences.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 63: 131–44.Google Scholar

Bogen, J. and Woodward, J. 1988. “Saving the Phenomena.” The Philosophical Review 97: 303–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Böhm-Bawerk, E. 1888. The Positive Theory of Capital, translated by W. Smart. Repr. New York: G. E. Stechert & Co., 1923.Google Scholar

Boland, L. 1979. “A Critique of Friedman’s Critics.” Journal of Economic Literature 17: 503–22.Google Scholar

Boland, L. 1981. “On the Futility of Criticizing the Neoclassical Maximization Hypothesis.” American Economic Review 73: 1031–6.Google Scholar

Boland, L. 1982a. “Difficulties with the Element of Time and the ‘Principles’ of Economics or Some Lies My Teachers Told Me.” Eastern Economic Journal 8: 47–58.Google Scholar

Boland, L. 1982b. The Foundations of Economic Method. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Boland, L. 1986. Methodology for a New Microeconomics. Boston: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Boland, L. 1987. “Boland on Friedman’s Methodology: A Summation.” Journal of Economic Issues 21: 380–8.Google Scholar

Boland, L. 1989. The Methodology of Economic Model Building: Methodology after Samuelson. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bolton, G., Katok, E., and Zwick, R.. 1998. “Dictator Game Giving: Rules of Fairness versus Acts of Kindness.” International Journal of Game Theory 27: 269–99.Google Scholar

Booth, W. 1974. Modern Dogma and the Rhetoric of Assent. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Booth, W. 1979. Critical Understanding: The Powers and Limits of Pluralism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Boyd, R. 1984. “The Current Status of Scientific Realism,” in Leplin, J., ed. Scientific Realism. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 41–82.Google Scholar

Braithwaite, R. 1953. Scientific Explanation: A Study of the Function of Theory, Probability and Law in Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bray, J. 1977. “The Logic of Scientific Method in Economics.” Journal of Economic Studies 4: 1–28.Google Scholar

Bridgman, P. 1927. The Logic of Modern Physics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Bridgman, P. 1938. “Operational Analysis.” Philosophy of Science 5: 114–31.Google Scholar

Brodbeck, M. 1958. “Methodological Individualism: Definition and Reduction.” Philosophy of Science 25: 1–22.Google Scholar

Bromberger, S. 1966. “Why Questions,” in Colodny, R., ed. Mind and Cosmos: Essays in Contemporary Science and Philosophy. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 86–111.Google Scholar

Bronfenbrenner, M. 1966. “A ‘Middlebrow’ Introduction to Economic Methodology,” in Krupp, S., ed. The Structure of Economic Science. New York: Prentice-Hall, pp. 5–24.Google Scholar

Bronfenbrenner, M. 1971. “The Structure of Revolutions in Economic Thought.” History of Political Economy 3: 136–51.Google Scholar

Broome, John. 1993. “A Cause of Preference Is Not an Object of Preference.” Social Choice and Welfare 10: 57–68.Google Scholar

Broome, John. 1998. “Extended preferences” In Preferences, Fehige, C. and Wessels, U., eds. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 279–96.Google Scholar

Brunner, K. 1969. “‘Assumptions’ and the Cognitive Quality of Theories.” Synthese 20: 501–25.Google Scholar

Brzezinski, J. F. Coniglione, Kuipers, R., and Nowak, L., eds. 1990. Idealization I: General Problems. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and Humanities 16. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar

Buchanan, J. 1975. The Limits of Liberty: Between Anarchy and the Leviathan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Buchanan, J. 1979. What Should Economists Do? Indianapolis: Liberty Press.Google Scholar

Buck, R. 1963. “Reflexive Predictions.” Philosophy of Science 30: 359–69.Google Scholar

Burke, K. 1950. A Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Burke, K. 1961. The Rhetoric of Religion: Studies in Logology. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Cairnes, J. 1875. The Character and Logical Method of Political Economy. 2nd ed. Repr. New York: A. M. Kelley, 1965.Google Scholar

Caldwell, B. 1980a. “A Critique of Friedman’s Methodological Instrumentalism.” Southern Economic Journal 47: 366–74.Google Scholar

Caldwell, B. 1982. Beyond Positivism: Economic Methodology in the Twentieth Century. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Caldwell, B. 1983. “The Neoclassical Maximization Hypothesis: Comment.” American Economic Review 75: 824–7.Google Scholar

Caldwell, B. 1990. “Does Methodology Matter? How Should It Be Practiced?” Finnish Economic Papers 3: 64–71.Google Scholar

Caldwell, B. 1991. “Clarifying Popper.” Journal of Economic Literature 29: 1–33.Google Scholar

Caldwell, B., ed. 1984. Appraisal and Criticism in Economics. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G., and Prelec, D.. 2005. “Neuroeconomics: How Neuroscience Can Inform Economics.” Journal of Economic Literature 43: 9–64.Google Scholar

Camerer, C. and Thaler, R.. 1995. “Anomalies: Ultimatums, Dictators and Manners.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 9: 209–19.Google Scholar

Card, D. and Kreuger, A.. 1994. “Minimum Wages and Employment: A Case Study of the Fast-Food Industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania.” American Economic Review 84: 773–93.Google Scholar

Carnap, R. 1950. Logical Foundations of Probability. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Carnap, R. 1956. “The Methodological Character of Theoretical Concepts,” in Feigl, H. and Scriven, M., eds. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 1. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 33–76.Google Scholar

Cartwright, N. 1983. How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cartwright, N. 1989. Nature’s Capacities and Their Measurement. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Cartwright, N. 1999. The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cartwright, N. 2007. Hunting Causes and Using Them: Approaches in Philosophy and Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cartwright, N. and Hardie, J.. 2012. Evidence-Based Policy: A Practical Guide to Doing It Better. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cass, D., Okuno, M., and Zilcha, I.. 1980. “The Role of Money in Supporting the Pareto Optimality of Competitive Equilibrium in Consumption Loan Type Models,” in Kareken, and Wallace, , eds. (1980), pp. 13–48.Google Scholar

Cass, D. and Shell, K.. 1980. “In Defense of a Basic Approach,” in Kareken, and Wallace, , eds. (1980), pp. 251–60.Google Scholar

Cass, D. and Yaari, M.. 1966. “A Re-examination of the Pure Consumption Loans Model.” Journal of Political Economy 74: 353–67.Google Scholar

Charness, G. 2004. “Attribution and Reciprocity in an Experimental Labor Market.” Journal of Labour Economics 22: 665–88.Google Scholar

Chu, Y. and Chu, R.. 1990. “The Subsidence of Preference Reversals in Simplified and Marketlike Experimental Settings: A Note.” American Economic Review 80: 902–11.Google Scholar

Coase, R. 1960. “The Problem of Social Cost.” Journal of Law and Economics 3: 1–30.Google Scholar

Coats, A. 1969. “Is There a ‘Structure of Scientific Revolutions’ in Economics?” Kyklos 22: 289–94.Google Scholar

Coddington, A. 1972. “Positive Economics.” Canadian Journal of Economics 5: 1–15.Google Scholar

Colander, D. and Klamer, A.. 1987. “The Making of an Economist.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 1: 95–112.Google Scholar

Coleman, J. 1986. Individual Interest and Collective Action: Selected Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Coleman, J. 1984. “Economics and the Law: A Critical Review of the Foundations of the Economic Approach to Law.” Ethics 94: 649–79.Google Scholar

Collingwood, R. 1940. An Essay on Metaphysics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Copernicus, N. 1543. On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres, translated by A. Duncan. New York: Barnes & Noble, 1976.Google Scholar

Cox, J. and Epstein, S.. 1989. “Preference Reversals without the Independence Axiom.” American Economic Review 79: 408–26.Google Scholar

Cross, R. 1982. “The Duhem-Quine Thesis, Lakatos and the Appraisal of Theories in Macroeconomics.” Economic Journal 92: 320–40.Google Scholar

Cyert, R., and Grunberg, E.. 1963. “Assumption, Prediction and Explanation in Economics,” in Cyert, and March, , eds. (1963), pp. 298–311.Google Scholar

Cyert, R., and March, J., eds. 1963. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Cyert, R. and Pottinger, G.. 1979. “Towards a Better Micro-economic Theory.” Philosophy of Science 46: 204–22.Google Scholar

Dagum, C. 1986. “Economic Model, System and Structure, Philosophy of Science and Lakatos’ Methodology of Scientific Research Programs.” Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Economiche e Commerciali 33: 859–86.Google Scholar

Davidson, D. 1963. “Actions, Reasons and Causes.” Journal of Philosophy 60: 685–700.Google Scholar

Davidson, D. 1980. Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

De Alessi, L. 1971. “Reversals of Assumptions and Implications.” Journal of Political Economy 79: 867–77.Google Scholar

Debreu, G. 1959. Theory of Value. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Debreu, G. 1974. “Excess Demand Functions.” Journal of Mathematical Economics 1: 15–23.Google Scholar

Debreu, G. 1991. “The Mathematization of Economic Theory.” American Economic Review 81: 1–7.Google Scholar

DellaVigna, S., List, J. A., Malmendier, U., and Rao, G.. 2022. “Estimating Social Preferences and Gift Exchange at Work.” American Economic Review 112: 1038–74.Google Scholar

deLong, J. B. 2008. “Why Should Economists Study Economic History?” (www.bradford-delong.com/2008/01/why-should-econ.html).Google Scholar

de Marchi, N. 1970. “The Empirical Content and Longevity of Ricardian Economics.” Economica 37: 257–76.Google Scholar

de Marchi, N. 1976. “Anomaly and the Development of Economics: The Case of the Leontief Paradox,” in Latsis, , ed. (1976), pp. 100–28.Google Scholar

de Marchi, N. 1986. “Discussion: Mill’s Unrevised Philosophy of Economics: A Comment on Hausman.” Philosophy of Science 53: 89–100.Google Scholar

de Marchi, N., ed. 1988. The Popperian Legacy in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

de Marchi, N. and Blaug, M., eds. 1991. Appraising Economic Theories: Studies in the Methodology of Research Programs. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. 1939a. “Experience, Knowledge and Value: A Rejoinder,” in P. Schilpp, ed. The Philosophy of John Dewey. La Salle, IL: Open Court, pp. 515–608.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. 1939b. Theory of Valuation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Diamond, P. 1965. “National Debt in a Neoclassical Growth Model.” American Economic Review 55: 1126–50.Google Scholar

Diesing, P. 1982. Science and Ideology in the Policy Sciences. New York: Aldine.Google Scholar

Dillard, D. 1978. “Revolutions in Economic Theory.” Southern Economic Journal 44: 705–24.Google Scholar

Dolan, E., ed. 1976. The Foundations of Modern Austrian Economics. Kansas City: Sheed & Ward.Google Scholar

Dreyer, J. 1953. A History of Astronomy from Thales to Kepler (Formerly Titled History of the Planetary Systems from Thales to Kepler). New York: Dover.Google Scholar

Dugger, W. 1979. “Methodological Differences between Institutional and Neoclassical Economics.” Journal of Economic Issues 13: 899–909.Google Scholar

Duhem, P. 1906. The Aim and Structure of Scientific Theories, translated by P. Wiener. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1954.Google Scholar

Duhem, P. 1908. To Save the Phenomena, translated by S. Jaki. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Dzionek-Kozłowska, J. and Rehman, S. N.. 2017. “Attitudes of Economics and Sociology Students towards Cooperation. A Cross-Cultural Study.” Economics and Sociology, 10(4): 124–36.Google Scholar

Earman, J., ed. 1983. Testing Scientific Theories. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Earman, J. and Roberts, J.. 1999. “Ceteris Paribus, There Is No Problem of Provisos.” Synthese 118: 439–78.Google Scholar

Earman, J., Roberts, J., and Smith, S.. 2002. “Ceteris Paribus Lost.” Erkenntnis 57: 281–301.Google Scholar

Edgeworth, F. 1881. Mathematical Psychics: An Essay on the Application of Mathematics to the Moral Sciences. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Edwards, W. and von Winterfeldt, D.. 1986. “Cognitive Illusions and Their Implications for the Law.” Southern California Law Review 59: 225–76.Google Scholar

Eells, E. 1982. Rational Decision and Causality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Eichner, A. 1983. “Why Economics Is Not Yet a Science,” in Eichner, A., ed. Why Economics Is Not Yet a Science. Armonk, New York: M.E. Sharpe, pp. 205–41.Google Scholar

Ellsberg, D. 1954. “Classic and Current Notions of ‘Measurable Utility.’” Economic Journal 64: 528–56. Repr. in Page, A., ed. Utility Theory: A Book of Readings. New York: Wiley, 1968, pp. 269–96.Google Scholar

Elster, J. 1983. Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Elster, J. 1989a. The Cement of Society: A Study of Social Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Elster, J. 1989b. Solomonic Judgements: Studies in the Limitations of Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Elster, J. and Roemer, J., eds. 1991. Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-Being. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Englmaier, F. and Leider, S.. 2020. “Managerial Payoff and Gift Exchange in the Field.” Review of Industrial Organization 56: 259–280.Google Scholar

Esteban, J. 1986. “A Characterization of the Core in Overlapping-Generations Economies: An Exact Consumption-Loan Model of Interest with or without the Social Contrivance of Money.” Journal of Economic Theory 39: 439–56.Google Scholar

Etzioni, A. 1971. Modern Organizations. Englewood Clifs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Etzioni, A. 1986. “The Case for a Multiple-Utility Conception.” Economics and Philosophy 2: 159–84.Google Scholar

Etzioni, A. 1988 . The Moral Dimension. Toward a New Economics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Fair, R. 1978. “A Theory of Extramarital Affairs.” Journal of Political Economy 86: 45–61.Google Scholar

Falk, A. 2007. “Gift Exchange in the Field.” Econometrica 75: 1501–11.Google Scholar

Fama, E. 1980. “Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm.” Journal of Political Economy 88: 288–307.Google Scholar

Fankhauser, S., Tol, R., and Pearce, D.. 1997. “The Aggregation of Climate Change Damages: A Welfare Theoretic Approach.” Environmental and Resource Economics 10: 249–66.Google Scholar

Fehr, E., Kirchsteiger, G., and Riedl, A.. 1998. “Gift Exchange and Reciprocity in Competitive Experimental Markets.” European Economic Review 42: 1–34.Google Scholar

Fehr, E. and Schmidt, K.. 1999. A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 114: 817–68.Google Scholar

Fehr, E., Goette, L., and Zehnder, C.. 2009. “A Behavioral Account of the Labor Market: The Role of Fairness Concerns.” Annual Review of Economics 1: 355–84.Google Scholar

Feigl, H. and Maxwell, G., eds. 1962. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 3. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Festinger, L. 1954. “A Theory of Social Comparison Processes.” Human Relations 7: 117–40.Google Scholar

Feyerabend, P. 1975. Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge. London: Verso Edition.Google Scholar

Fish, S. 1980. Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Fish, S. 1988. “Comments from Outside Economics,” in Klamer, et al., eds. (1988), pp. 21–30.Google Scholar

Fisher, R. 1986. The Logic of Economic Discovery: Neoclassical Economics and the Marginal Revolution. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Fodor, J. 1991. “You Can Fool Some of the People All of the Time, Everything Else Being Equal; Hedged Laws and Psychological Explanations.” Mind 100: 19–34.Google Scholar

Fox, J. 2014. “Will Economics Finally Get Its Paradigm Shift?” Harvard Business Review, April 28, 2014.Google Scholar

Frank, R. 1988. Passions within Reason: The Strategic Role of the Emotions. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Fraser, L. 1937. Economic Thought and Language. A Critique of Some Fundamental Concepts. London: A & C Black.Google Scholar

Frazer, W. and Boland, L.. 1983. “An Essay on the Foundations of Friedman’s Methodology.” American Economic Review 73: 129–44.Google Scholar

Friedman, B. 2005. The Moral Consequences of Economic Growth. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar

Friedman, Michael. 1974. “Explanation and Scientific Understanding.” Journal of Philosophy 71: 5–19.Google Scholar

Friedman, Michael. 1979. “Truth and Confirmation.” Journal of Philosophy 76: 361–82.Google Scholar

Friedman, Michael. 1998. Kant and the Exact Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Friedman, Milton. 1953a. Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Friedman, Milton. 1953b. “The Marshallian Demand Curve,” in Friedman, , ed. (1953a), pp. 47–99.Google Scholar

Friedman, Milton. 1953c. “The Methodology of Positive Economics,” in Friedman, , ed. (1953a), pp. 3–43.Google Scholar

Friedman, Milton. 1957. A Theory of the Consumption Function. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Friedman, Milton. 1962. Price Theory: A Provisional Text, Revised edition. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar

Friedman, Milton. 1968. ‘The Role of Monetary Policy,’ The American Economic Review 58: pp. 1–17.Google Scholar

Friedman, M. and Savage, L.. 1952. “The Expected-Utility Hypothesis and the Measurability of Utility.” Journal of Political Economy 60: 463–74.Google Scholar

Frigg, R. 2010. “Fiction and Scientific Representation.” in Frigg, R. and Hunter, M., eds. Beyond Mimesis and Convention, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 262: 97–138.Google Scholar

Fuchs, V. 1989. “Women’s Quest for Economic Equality.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 3: 25–42.Google Scholar

Fulton, G. 1984. “Research Programmes in Economics.” History of Political Economy 16: 187–206.Google Scholar

Gale, D. 1973. “Pure Exchange Equilibrium of Dynamic Economic Models.” Journal of Economic Theory 6: 12–36.Google Scholar

Galileo, G. 1632. Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Galileo, G. 1638. Discourses Concerning Two New Sciences. Rpt. London: Gale ECCO, 2018.Google Scholar

Geanakoplos, J. 2008. “Overlapping Generations Models of General Equilibrium.” Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper No. 1663, pp. 1–41.Google Scholar

Geanakoplos, J. and Polemarchakis, H.. 1986. “Walrasian Indeterminacy and Keynesian Macroeconomics.” Review of Economic Studies 53: 755–79.Google Scholar

Gellner, E. 1973. Cause and Meaning in the Social Sciences, ed. Jarvie, I. and Agassi, J.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gibbard, A. and Varian, H.. 1978. “Economic Models.” Journal of Philosophy 75: 664–77.Google Scholar

Giere, R. 1979, 1982. Understanding Scientific Reasoning. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. 2nd ed. 1982.Google Scholar

Girardi, D., Mamunuru, S. M., Halliday, S. D., and Bowles, S.. 2021. “Does Economics Make You Selfish?” UMass Amherst Working Papers. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/econ_workingpaper/304/.Google Scholar

Glimcher, P., Camerer, C., Poldrack, R. A., and Fehr, E.. 2008. Neuroeconomics: Decision Making and the Brain. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Glimcher, P., and Fehr, E., eds. 2014. Neuroeconomics: Decision Making and the Brain London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Glymour, C. 1980. Theory and Evidence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Glymour, C. 1983. “On Testing and Evidence,” in Earman, , ed. (1983), pp. 3–26.Google Scholar

Glymour, C., Kelly, K., Scheines, R., and Spirtes, P.. 1987. Discovering Causal Structure. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Gneezy, U. and List, J.. 2006. “Putting Behavioral Economics to Work: Testing for Gift Exchange in Labor Markets Using Field Experiments.” Econometrica 74: 1365–84.Google Scholar

Godfrey-Smith, P. 2006. “The Strategy of Model-Based Science.” Biology and Philosophy 21:725–40.Google Scholar

Goldin, C. 2014. “A Grand Gender Convergence: Its Last Chapter.” American Economic Review 104: 1091–119.Google Scholar

Goodin, R. “Laundering Preferences.” pp. 75–101 of Elster and Hylland (1986).Google Scholar

Gorovitz, S. 1969. “Aspects of the Pragmatics of Explanation.” Nous 3: 61–72.Google Scholar

Granovetter, M. 1981. “Toward a Sociological Theory of Income Differences,” in Berg, I., ed. Sociological Perspectives on Labor Markets. New York: Academic Press, pp. 11–47.Google Scholar

Granovetter, M. 1985. “Economics and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology 91: 481–510.Google Scholar

Grant, A. 2016. “More Evidence That Learning Economics Makes You Selfish.” Evonomics: The Next Evolution of Economics. https://evonomics.com/more-evidence-that-learning-economics-makes-you-selfish/.Google Scholar

Grether, D. and Plott, C.. 1979. “Economic Theory of Choice and the Preference Reversal Phenomenon.” American Economic Review 69: 623–38.Google Scholar

Grether, D. and Plott, C.. 1982. “Economic Theory of Choice and the Preference Reversal Phenomenon: Reply.” American Economic Review 72: 575.Google Scholar

Griffin, J. 1986. Well-Being: Its Meaning, Measurement and Moral Importance. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Gruchy, A. 1947. Modern Economic Thought: The American Contribution. Repr. New York: A. M. Kelley, 1967.Google Scholar

Grünbaum, A. 1976. “Is Falsifiability the Touchstone of Scientific Rationality? Karl Popper Versus Inductivism,” in Cohen, R. et al., eds. Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 213–52.Google Scholar

Guala, F. 2019. “Preferences: Neither Behavioral nor Mental.” Economics and Philosophy 35: 383–401.Google Scholar

Guala, F. and Mittone, L.. 2010. “Paradigmatic Experiments: The Dictator Game.” Journal of Socio-Economics 39: 578–84.Google Scholar

Gul, F. and Pesandorfer, W.. 2008. “The Case for Mindless Economics,” in Caplin, and Schotter, , eds. (2008), pp. 3–39.Google Scholar

Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., and Schwarze, B.. 1982. “An Experimental Analysis of Ultimatum Bargaining.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3: 367–88.Google Scholar

Hacking, I. 1979. “Imre Lakatos’s Philosophy of Science.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30: 181–202.Google Scholar

Hagen, O. 1979. “Towards a Positive Theory of Preferences under Risk,” in Allais, and Hagen, , eds. (1979), pp. 271–302.Google Scholar

Hagen, O. 1980. “Discussion,” in Kareken, and Wallace, , eds. (1980), pp. 161–5.Google Scholar

Hagen, O. 1982. Money and Inflation. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hagen, O. 1986. “Arjo Klamer’s Conversations with Economists: New Classical Economists and Opponents Speak out on the Current Controversy in Microeconomics.” Economics and Philosophy 2: 275–81.Google Scholar

Hall, R. and Hitch, C.. 1939. “Price Theory and Business Behaviour.” Oxford Economic Papers 2: 12–45.Google Scholar

Händler, E. 1980. “The Logical Structure of Modern Neoclassical Static Microeconomic Equilibrium Theory.” Erkenntnis 15: 33–53.Google Scholar

Hands, D. 1979. “The Methodology of Economic Research Programs.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 9: 292–303.Google Scholar

Hands, D. 1985a. “Karl Popper and Economic Methodology.” Economics and Philosophy 1: 83–100.Google Scholar

Hands, D. 1985b. “Second Thoughts on Lakatos.” History of Political Economy 17: 1–16.Google Scholar

Hands, D. 1985c. “The Structuralist View of Economic Theories: The Case of General Equilibrium in Particular.” Economics and Philosophy 1: 303–36.Google Scholar

Hands, D. 1988. “Ad Hocness in Economics and the Popperian Tradition,” in de Marchi, , ed. (1988), pp. 121–39.Google Scholar

Hands, D. 1991a. “The Problem of Excess Content: Economics, Novelty and a Long Popperian Tale,” in de Marchi, and Blaug, , eds. (1991), pp. 58–75.Google Scholar

Hands, D. 1991b. “Reply to Mäki and Hamminga,” in de Marchi, and Blaug, , eds. (1991), pp. 91–102.Google Scholar

Hands, D. W. 1985c. “The Structuralist View of Economic Theories: A Review Essay: The Case of General Equilibrium in Particular.” Economics and Philosophy 1:303–335.Google Scholar

Hanfling, O. 1981a. Logical Positivism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hanfling, O. 1981b. Essential Readings in Logical Positivism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Harsanyi, J. 1955. “Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility.” Journal of Political Economy 63: 309–21.Google Scholar

Harsanyi, J. 1977a. “Morality and the Theory of Rational Behavior.” Social Research 44. Repr. Sen and Williams (1982), pp. 39–62.Google Scholar

Harsanyi, J. 1977b. Rational Behavior and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and Social Situations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Harsanyi, J. 1977. Rational Behavior and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and Social Situations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hart, H. and Honoré, T.. 1985. Causation in the Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Hartmann, S. 1999. “Models and Stories in Hadron Physics.” In Morgan, M and Morrison, M, eds. 1999, pp. 326–46.Google Scholar

Hausman, D. 1980. “How to Do Philosophy of Economics,” in Asquith, P. and Giere, R., eds. 1980. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 352–62.Google Scholar

Hausman, D. 1981a. Capital, Profits, and Prices: An Essay in the Philosophy of Economics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Hausman, D. 1981b. “John Stuart Mill’s Philosophy of Economics.” Philosophy of Science 48: 363–85.Google Scholar

Hausman, D. 1988a. “An Appraisal of Popperian Methodology,” in de Marchi, , ed. (1988), pp. 65–86.Google Scholar

Hausman, D. 1988b. “Economic Methodology and Philosophy of Science,” in Winston, and Teichgraeber, , eds. (1988), pp. 88–116.Google Scholar

Hausman, D. 1989a. “Arbitrage Arguments.” Erkenntnis 30: 5–22.Google Scholar

Hausman, D. 1989b. “Economic Methodology in a Nutshell.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 3: 115–28.Google Scholar

Hausman, D. 1990b. “Supply and Demand Explanations and Their Ceteris Paribus Clauses.” Review of Political Economy 2: 168–86.Google Scholar

Hausman, D. 1991. “On Dogmatism in Economics: The Case of Preference Reversals,” Journal of Socio-Economics 20: 205–25.Google Scholar

Hausman, D. 2001. “Explanation and Diagnosis in Economics,” Revue Internationale De Philosophie 55: 311–26.Google Scholar

Hausman, D. 2012. Preference, Value, Choice, and Welfare. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hausman, D. 2013. “Paradox Postponed.” Journal of Economic Methodology 20: 250–4.Google Scholar

Hausman, D., ed. 2007. The Philosophy of Economics: An Anthology. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hausman, D., McPherson, M., and Satz, D.. 2017. Economic Analysis, Moral Philosophy, and Public Policy. 3rd. ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hayek, F. 1937. “Economics and Knowledge.” Economica 4: 33–54.Google Scholar

Hayek, F. 1952. The Counter-Revolution of Science: Studies in the Abuse of Reason. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Heathwood, C. 2005. “The Problem of Defective Desires.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83: 487–504.Google Scholar

Heckman, J. 1997. “Instrumental Variables: A Study of Implicit Behavioral Assumptions Used in Making Program Evaluations.” The Journal of Human Resources 32: 441–462.Google Scholar

Helm, D. 1984. “Predictions and Causes: A Comparison of Friedman and Hicks on Method.” Oxford Economic Papers 36 (Supplement): 118–34.Google Scholar

Hempel, C. 1965. Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. and Quandt, R.. 1980. Microeconomic Theory: A Mathematical Approach. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. and Kremer, M., Miguel, E., Leino, J., and Zwane, A. P.. 2011. “Spring Cleaning: Rural Water Impacts, Valuation, and Property Rights Institutions.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 126:145–205.Google Scholar

Herstein, I. and Milnor, J.. 1953. "An Axiomatic Approach to Measurable Utility." Econometrica 21: 291–7.Google Scholar

Hicks, J. 1939. “The Foundations of Welfare Economics.” Economic Journal 49: 696–712.Google Scholar

Hicks, J. 1946. Value and Capital. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hicks, J. and Allen, R.. 1934. “A Reconsideration of the Theory of Value.” Economica. N.S. 1: 52–76 and 196–219.Google Scholar

Hirsch, A. and de Marchi, N.. 1986. “Making a Case When Theory Is Unfalsifiable: Friedman’s Monetary History.” Economics and Philosophy 2: 1–22.Google Scholar

Hirsch, A. and de Marchi, N.. 1990. Milton Friedman: Economics in Theory and Practice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Hirsch, F. 1976. The Social Limits to Growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Hitchcock, C. 1995. “The Mishap at Reichenbach Fall: Singular vs. General Causation.” Philosophical Studies 78: 257–91.Google Scholar

Hitchcock, C. 1996. “Farewell to Binary Causation.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 26: 267–82.Google Scholar

Hitchcock, C. 2001. “The Intransitivity of Causation Revealed in Equations and Graphs.” Journal of Philosophy 98: 273–99.Google Scholar

Hitchcock, C. 2003. “Of Humean Bondage.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54: 1–25.Google Scholar

Hitchcock, C. and Woodward, J.. 2003a. “Explanatory Generalizations, Part I: A Counterfactual Account.” Noûs 37: 1–24.Google Scholar

Hitchcock, C. and Woodward, J.. 2003b. “Explanatory Generalizations, Part II: Plumbing Explanatory Depth.” Noûs 37: 181–99.Google Scholar

Hodgson, G. 1986. “Behind Methodological Individualism.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 10: 211–24.Google Scholar

Holland, J., Holyoak, K., Nisbett, R., and Thagard, P.. 1986. Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning, and Discovery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Hollander, S. 1985. The Economics of John Stuart Mill. Vol. 1 Theory and Method. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Hollis, M. and Nell, E.. 1975. Rational Economic Man: A Philosophical Critique of Neo-Classical Economics. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Holt, C. 1986. “Preference Reversals and the Independence Axioms.” American Economic Review 76: 508–15.Google Scholar

Homans, G. 1953. “Status among Clerical Workers.” Human Organization 12: 5–10.Google Scholar

Homans, G. 1954. “The Cash Posters.” American Sociological Review 19: 724–33.Google Scholar

Hoover, K. 1988. The New Classical Macroeconomics: A Sceptical Inquiry. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Houthakker, H. 1950. “Revealed Preference and the Utility Function.” Economica 17: 159–74.Google Scholar

Hoyningen-Huene, P. 1987. “Context of Discovery and Context of Justification.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 18: 501–16.Google Scholar

Huber, J. and Puto, C.. 1983. “Market Boundaries and Product Choice: Illustrating Attraction and Substitution Effects.” Journal of Consumer Research 10: 31–44.Google Scholar

Huber, J., Payne, J. W., and Puto, C.. 1982. “Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives: Violations of Regularity and the Similarity Hypothesis.” Journal of Consumer Research 9: 90–8.Google Scholar

Hull, D. 1988. Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hume, D. 1738. A Treatise of Human Nature. Repr. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1966.Google Scholar

Hume, D. 1748. An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Repr. Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, 1955.Google Scholar

Hutchison, T. 1938. The Significance and Basic Postulates of Economic Theory. Repr. with a new Preface. New York: A.M. Kelley, 1960.Google Scholar

Hutchison, T. 1941. “The Significance and Basic Postulates of Economic Theory: A Reply to Professor Knight.” Journal of Political Economy 49: 732–50.Google Scholar

Hutchison, T. 1956. “Professor Machlup on Verification in Economics.” Southern Economic Journal 22: 476–83.Google Scholar

Hutchison, T. 1960. “Methodological Prescriptions in Economics: A Reply.” Economica 27: 158–60.Google Scholar

Hutchison, T. 1977. Knowledge and Ignorance in Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hutchison, T. 1978. On Revolutions and Progress in Economic Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hutchison, T. 1981. The Politics and Philosophy of Economics: Marxians, Keynesians and Austrians. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hutchison, T. 1988. “The Case for Falsification,” in de Marchi, , ed. (1988), pp. 169–82.Google Scholar

Hyman, H. 1942. The Psychology of Status. Reprint London: Forgotten Book, 2018.Google Scholar

Jalladeau, J. 1978. “Research Program versus Paradigm in the Development of Economics.” Journal of Economic Issues 12: 583–608.Google Scholar

Jensen, N. 1967. "An Introduction to Bernoullian Utility Theory: I. Utility Functions." Swedish Journal of Economics 69: 163–83.Google Scholar

Jensen, M. and Meckling, W.. 1976. “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305–60.Google Scholar

Jones, E. 1977. “Positive Economics or What?” Economic Record 53: 350–63.Google Scholar

Kagel, J., Battalio, R., Rachlin, H., et al. 1975. “Experimental Studies of Consumer Behavior Using Laboratory Animals.” Economic Inquiry 13: 22–38.Google Scholar

Kahnemann, D. 1992. “Reference Points, Anchors, Norms, and Mixed Feelings.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 51: 296–312.Google Scholar

Kahnemann, D. 1999. “Objective Happiness,” in Kahneman, D., Diener, E., and Schwarz, N., eds. Well-Being: Foundations of Hedonic Psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation Press, pp. 3–27.Google Scholar

Kahnemann, D. 2000a. “Evaluation by Moments: Past and Future,” in Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A., eds. (2000), pp. 693–708.Google Scholar

Kahnemann, D. 2000b. “Experienced Utility and Objective Happiness: A Moment-Based Approach,” in Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A., eds. (2000), pp. 673–92.Google Scholar

Kahnemann, D. 2006. "New Challenges to the Rationality Assumption," in Slovic, P. and Lichtenstein, S., eds. The Construction of Preference. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 487–503.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J., and Thaler, R.. 1986. “Fairness as a Constraint on Profit Seeking.” American Economic Review 76: 728–41.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J., and Thaler, R.. 1990. “Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem.” Journal of Political Economy 98: 1325–48.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J., and Thaler, R.. 1991. “The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 5: 193–206.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A.. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Making under Risk.” Econometrica 47: 263–91.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A., eds. 2000. Choices, Values and Frames. New York: Cambridge University Press and the Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., Wakker, P., and Sarin, R.. 1997. “Back to Bentham? Explorations of Experienced Utility.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 112: pp. 375–405.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N., and Stone, A. A.. 2004a. “A Survey Method for Characterizing Daily Life Experience: The Day Reconstruction Method.” Science 306 (5702): 1776–80.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N., and Stone, A. A.. 2004b. “Toward National Well-Being Accounts.” American Economic Review 94: 429–34.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. and Krueger, A.. 2006. “Developments in the Measurement of Subjective Well-Being.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 20: 3–24.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. and Sugden, R.. 2005. “Experienced Utility as a Standard of Policy Evaluation.” Environmental and Resource Economics 32: 161–81.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. and Thaler, R.. 2006. “Utility Maximization and Experienced Utility.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 20: 221–34.Google Scholar

Kaldor, N. 1939. “Welfare Propositions of Economics and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility.” Economic Journal 49: 549–52.Google Scholar

Kant, I. 1787. Critique of Pure Reason, translated by N. Kemp Smith. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Kaplan, M. 1989. “Bayesianism without the Black Box.” Philosophy of Science 56: 48–69.Google Scholar

Karelis, C. 1986. “Distributive Justice and the Public Good.” Economics and Philosophy 2: 101–26.Google Scholar

Karni, E. and Safra, Z.. 1987. “‘Preference Reversal’ and the Observability of Preferences by Experimental Methods.” Econometrica 55: 675–85.Google Scholar

Katz, J. 1988. “The Refutation of Indeterminacy.” Journal of Philosophy 85: 227–52.Google Scholar

Kaufmann, F. 1933. “On the Subject-Matter and Method of Economic Science.” Economica 13: 381–401.Google Scholar

Kaufmann, F. 1934. “The Concept of Law in Economic Science.” Review of Economic Studies 1: 102–9.Google Scholar

Kaufmann, F. 1942. “On the Postulates of Economic Theory.” Social Research 9: 379–95.Google Scholar

Kaufmann, F. 1944. Methodology of the Social Sciences. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kehoe, T. and Levine, D.. 1990. “The Economics of Indeterminacy in Overlapping Generations Models.” Journal of Public Economics 42; 219–43.Google Scholar

Kelly, K. 1987. “The Logic of Discovery.” Philosophy of Science 54: 435–52.Google Scholar

Kelly, K. and Glymour, C.. 1989. “Convergence to the Truth and Nothing but the Truth.” Philosophy of Science 56: 185–220.Google Scholar

Keynes, J. N. 1917. The Scope and Method of Political Economy (4th ed.) (1st ed. 1891). Repr. New York: A. M. Kelley, 1955.Google Scholar

Kim, B., Seligman, D., and Kable, J. W.. 2012. “Preference Reversals in Decision Making under Risk Are Accompanied by Changes in Attention to Different Attributes.” Frontiers in Neuroscience. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2012.00109.Google Scholar

Kincaid, H. 1986. “Reduction, Explanation, and Individualism.” Philosophy of Science 53: 492–513.Google Scholar

Kincaid, H. 1989. “Confirmation, Complexity and Social Laws,” in Fine, A., ed. PSA 1988, vol. 2. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 299–307.Google Scholar

Kitcher, P. 1981. “Explanatory Unification.” Philosophy of Science 48: 507–31.Google Scholar

Kitcher, P. 1995. The Advancement of Science – Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Klamer, A. 1984. Conversations with Economists: New Classical Economists and Opponents Speak Out on the Current Controversy in Macroeconomics. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.Google Scholar

Klamer, A. and Colander, D.. 1990. The Making of an Economist. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Klant, J. 1984. The Rules of the Game. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Klappholz, K. 1964. “Value Judgments and Economics.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 15: 97–114.Google Scholar

Klappholz, K. and Agassi, J.. 1959. “Methodological Prescriptions in Economics.” Economica 26: 60–74.Google Scholar

Klappholz, K. and Agassi, J.. 1960. “Methodological Prescriptions in Economics: A Rejoinder.” Economica 27: 160–1.Google Scholar

Klein, L. 1980. An Introduction to Econometric Forecasting and Forecasting Models. Philadelphia: New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Knetsch, J. L. 1989. The Endowment Effect and Evidence of Non-reversible Indifference Curves.” American Economic Review 79: 1277–84.Google Scholar

Knetsch, J. L. 1992. “Preferences and Nonreversibility of Indifference Curves. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 17: 131–9.Google Scholar

Knies, K. 1853. Die Politische Oekonomie Vom Standpunkte der Geschichtlichen Methode. 2nd ed. Braunschweig: C.A. Schwetschke, 1883.Google Scholar

Knight, F. 1921. “Traditional Economic Theory – Discussion.” American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings 22: 143–6.Google Scholar

Knight, F. 1935a. “Economics and Human Action,” from Knight 1935b. Repr. in Hausman, ed. (1984), pp. 141–8.Google Scholar

Knight, F. 1935b. The Ethics of Competition and Other Essays. New York and London: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar

Knight, F. 1940. “What Is ‘Truth’ in Economics?” Journal of Political Economy 48: 1–32.Google Scholar

Knight, F. 1941. “The Significance and Basic Postulates of Economic Theory: A Rejoinder.” Journal of Political Economy 49: 750–3.Google Scholar

Knight, F. 1957. Three Essays on the State of Economic Science. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Knight, F. 1961. “Methodology in Economics.” Southern Economic Journal 27: 185–93, 273–82.Google Scholar

Knight, F. 1979. “Economics among the Sciences.” American Economic Review 69: 1–13.Google Scholar

Krajewski, W. 1977. Correspondence Principle and the Growth of Knowledge. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar

Kraut, R. 2007. What Is Good and Why. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Kreps, D., Milgrom, P., Roberts, J., and Wilson, R.. 1982. “Rational Cooperation in the Finitely Repeated Prisoners’ Dilemma.” Journal of Economic Theory 27: 245–52.Google Scholar

Krugman, P. n.d. “There’s Something about Macro.” http://web.mit.edu/krugman/www/islm.html.Google Scholar

Kube, S., André Maréchal, M., and Puppe, C.. 2012. “The Currency of Reciprocity: Gift Exchange in the Workplace.” American Economic Review 102: 1644–62.Google Scholar

Kube, S., André Maréchal, M., and Puppe, C.. 2013. “Do Wage Cuts Damage Work Morale? Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment.” Journal of the European Economic Association 11: 853–70.Google Scholar

Kuenne, R. 1971. Eugen von Böhm Bawerk. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. 1957. The Copernican Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. 1974. “Second Thoughts on Paradigms,” in Suppe, ed. (1977), pp. 459–82.Google Scholar

Kuipers, T., ed. 1987. What Is Closer-to-the Truth? A Parade of Approaches to Truthlikeness. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and Humanities. 10. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar

Kunin, L. and Weaver, F.. 1971. “On the Structure of Scientific Revolutions in Economics.” History of Political Economy 3: 391–7.Google Scholar

Lakatos, I. 1968. “Changes in the Problem of Inductive Logic.” Repr. in Lakatos, vol. 2 (1978): 128–200.Google Scholar

Lakatos, I. 1970. “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes,” in Lakatos and Musgrave (1970), pp. 91–196 and in Lakatos, vol. 1 (1978), pp. 8–101.Google Scholar

Lakatos, I. 1971. “History of Science and Its Rational Reconstructions.” Repr. in Lakatos, vol. 1 (1978), pp. 102–38.Google Scholar

Lakatos, I. 1974. “Popper on Demarcation and Induction,” in Schlipp, P., ed. The Philosophy of Karl Popper. LaSalle, IL, Open Court, pp. 241–73. Repr. in Lakatos, vol. 1 (1978), pp. 139–67.Google Scholar

Lakatos, I. 1976. Proofs and Refutations: The Logic of Mathematical Discovery. Worrall, J. and Zahar, E., eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lakatos, I. 1978a. “Anomalies versus ‘Crucial Experiments’ (a Rejoinder to Professor Grünbaum),” in Lakatos, vol. 2 (1978), pp. 211–23.Google Scholar

Lakatos, I. 1978. Philosophical Papers. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A., eds. 1970. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lakatos, I. and Zahar, E.. 1976. “Why Did Copernicus’s Research Programme Supersede Ptolemy’s?” Repr. in Lakatos, vol. 1 (1978b), pp. 168–92.Google Scholar

Lange, M. 2002. “Who’s Afraid of Ceteris-Paribus Laws? Or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Them.” Erkenntnis 57: 407–23.Google Scholar

Langley, P., Simon, H. A., Bradshaw, G., and Zytkow, J.. 1987. Scientific Discovery: Computational Explorations of the Creative Process. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Latsis, S. 1972. “Situational Determinism in Economics.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 23: 207–45.Google Scholar

Latsis, S. 1976. “A Research Programme in Economics,” in Latsis, ed. (1976), pp. 1–42.Google Scholar

Latsis, S., ed. 1976. Method and Appraisal in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Laudan, L. 1977. Progress and Its Problems: Toward a Theory of Scientific Growth. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Laudan, L. 1983. “The Demise of the Demarcation Problem.” Working Papers in Science and Technology 2: 7–36. Virginia Tech Center for the Study of Science in Society.Google Scholar

Layard, R. and Glaister, S., eds. 1994. Cost-Benefit Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Le Grand, J. 1991. Equity and Choice: An Essay in Economics and Applied Philosophy. London: Harper-Collins.Google Scholar

Leibenstein, H. 1976. Beyond Economic Man: A New Foundation for Economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Leijonhufvud, A. 1968. On Keynesian Economics and the Economics of Keynes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Leijonhufvud, A. 1976. “Schools, ‘Revolutions’ and Research Programmes in Economic Theory,” in Latsis, , ed. (1976), pp. 65–100.Google Scholar

Lerner, A. 1959a. “Consumption-Loan Interest and Money.” Journal of Political Economy 67: 512–18.Google Scholar

Lerner, A. 1959b. “Rejoinder.” Journal of Political Economy 67: 523–5.Google Scholar

Lester, R. A. 1946. “Shortcomings of Marginal Analysis for Wage-Employment Problems.” American Economic Review 36: 62–82.Google Scholar

Lester, R. A. 1947. “Marginal, Minimum Wages, and Labor Markets.” American Economic Review 37: 135–48.Google Scholar

Levi, I. 1967. Gambling with Truth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Levi, I. 1980. The Enterprise of Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Levi, I. 1986. “The Paradoxes of Allais and Ellsberg.” Economics and Philosophy 2: 23–53.Google Scholar

Levi, I. 1989. “Reply to Maher.” Economics and Philosophy 5: 79–90.Google Scholar

Levi, I. 1991. “Reply to Maher and Kashima.” Economics and Philosophy 7: 101–3.Google Scholar

Levi, I. and Morgenbesser, S.. 1964. “Beliefs and Dispositions.” American Philosophical Quarterly 1: 221–32.Google Scholar

Levine, A., Sober, E., and Wright, E.. 1987. “Marxism and Methodological Individualism.” New Left Review 162 (March/April): 67–84.Google Scholar

Levison, A. 1974. “Popper, Hume, and the Traditional Problem of Induction,” in Schilpp, , ed. (1974), pp. 322–31.Google Scholar

Levy, D. 1985. “The Impossibility of a Complete Methodological Individualist Reduction When Knowledge Is Imperfect.” Economics and Philosophy 1: 101–9.Google Scholar

Lewis, D. 1973. “Causation.” Journal of Philosophy 70: 556–67.Google Scholar

Lewis, D. 1973b. Counterfactuals. Cambridge: MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Lewis, D. 1986. “Postscripts to ‘Counterfactual Dependence and Time’s Arrow,’” in Philosophical Papers, vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 52–66.Google Scholar

Lichtenstein, S. and Slovic, P.. 1971. “Reversals of Preference between Bids and Choices in Gambling Decisions.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 89: 46–55.Google Scholar

Lichtenstein, S. and Slovic, P.. 1973. “Response-Induced Reversals of Preference in Gambling: An extended Replication in Las Vegas.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 101: 16–20.Google Scholar

Lichtenstein, S., Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., Layman, M., and Combs, B.. 1978. “Judged Frequency of Lethal Events.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 4: 551–78.Google Scholar

Lieberson, J. 1982a. “Karl Popper.” Social Research 49: 68–115.Google Scholar

Lieberson, J. 1982b. “The Romantic Rationalist.” New York Review of Books 29 (December 2) www.nybooks.com/articles/1982/12/02/the-romantic-rationalist/.Google Scholar

Lindman, H. 1971. “Inconsistent Preferences among Gambles.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 89: 390–7.Google Scholar

Lipsey, R. 1966. An Introduction to Positive Economics. 2nd ed. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.Google Scholar

Lipsey, R. and Lancaster, K.. 1956–7. “The General Theory of the Second Best.” Review of Economic Studies 24: 11–31.Google Scholar

Long, J. and Plosser, C.. 1983. “Real Business Cycles.” Journal of Political Economy 91: 39–69.Google Scholar

Loomes, G. and Sugden, R.. 1982. “Regret Theory: An Alternative Theory of Rational Choice under Uncertainty.” Economic Journal 92: 805–24.Google Scholar

Loomes, G. and Sugden, R.. 1983. “A Rationale for Preference Reversal.” American Economic Review 73: 428–32.Google Scholar

Lucas, R. 1980. “Methods and Problems in Business Cycle Theory.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 12: 696–715.Google Scholar

Luce, R. and Raiffa, H.. 1957. Games and Decisions. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Lukes, S. 1973. “Methodological Individualism Reconsidered,” in Ryan, , ed. (1973), pp. 119–30.Google Scholar

MacCrimmon, K. and Larsson, S.. 1979. “Utility Theory: Axioms versus ‘Paradoxes,’” in Allais, and Hagen, , ed. (1979), pp. 333–409.Google Scholar

Macdonald, G. 1986. “Modified Methodological Individualism.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 86: 199–211.Google Scholar

Mach, E. 1942. The Science of Mechanics. La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar

Machina, M. 1987. “Choice under Uncertainty: Problems Solved and Unsolved.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 1: 121–54.Google Scholar

Machlup, F. 1946. “Marginal Analysis and Empirical Research.” American Economic Review 36: 519–54.Google Scholar

Machlup, F. 1947. “Rejoinder to an Antimarginalist.” American Economic Review 37: 148–54.Google Scholar

Machlup, F. 1955. “The Problem of Verification in Economics.” Southern Economic Journal 22: 1–21.Google Scholar

Machlup, F. 1956. “Rejoinder to a Reluctant Ultra-Empiricist.” Southern Economic Journal 22: 483–93.Google Scholar

Machlup, F. 1960. “Operational Concepts and Mental Constructs in Model and Theory Formation.” Giornale Degli Economisti 19: 553–82.Google Scholar

Machlup, F. 1963. Essays on Economic Semantics Miller, M., ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Machlup, F. 1964. “Professor Samuelson on Theory and Realism.” American Economic Review. 54: 733–6.Google Scholar

Machlup, F. 1969. “If Matter Could Talk.” Repr. in F. Machlup, Methodology of Economics and Other Social Sciences. New York: Academic Press, pp. 309–32.Google Scholar

MacIntyre, A. 1967. “The Idea of a Social Science.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 41: 95–114.Google Scholar

MacKay, A. 1980. Arrow’s Theorem: The Paradox of Social Choice. A Case Study in the Philosophy of Economics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

MacKay, A. 1986. “Extended Sympathy and Interpersonal Utility Comparisons.” Journal of Philosophy 83: 305–22.Google Scholar

Mackie, J. 1974. The Cement of the Universe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Maher, P. 1989. “Levi on the Allais and Ellsberg Paradoxes.” Economics and Philosophy 5: 69–78.Google Scholar

Maher, P. and Kashima, Y.. 1991. “On the Descriptive Adequacy of Levi’s Decision Theory.” Economics and Philosophy 7: 93–100.Google Scholar

Mäki, U. 1986. “Rhetoric and the Expense of Coherence: A Reinterpretation of Milton Friedman’s Methodology.” Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology 4: 127–43.Google Scholar

Mäki, U. 1988a. “How to Combine Rhetoric and Realism in the Methodology of Economics.” Economics and Philosophy 4: 89–109.Google Scholar

Mäki, U. 1988b. “Realism, Economics, and Rhetoric: A Rejoinder to McCloskey.” Economics and Philosophy 4: 167–9.Google Scholar

Mäki, U. 1990. “Methodology of Economics: Complaints and Guidelines.” Finnish Economic Papers 3: 77–84.Google Scholar

Mäki, U. 1992. “On the Method of Isolation in Economics,” in Dilworth, C., ed. Intelligibility in Science in Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, vol. 26: pp. 19–54.Google Scholar

Mäki, U. 2005. “Models Are Experiments, Experiments Are Models. Journal of Economic Methodology 12: 303–15.Google Scholar

Mäki, U. 2009. “Missing the World: Models as Isolations and Credible Surrogate Systems.” Erkenntnis 70: 29–43.Google Scholar

Mayo, E. 1949. The Social Problems of an Industrial Civilization. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

McCallum, B. 1983. “The Role of Overlapping Generations Models in Monetary Economics,” in Brunner, K. and Meltzer, A., eds. Theory, Policy and Institutions: Papers from the Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 129–64.Google Scholar

McClennen, E. 1983. “Sure Thing Doubts,” in Stigum, B. and Wenstop, F., eds. Foundations of Utility and Risk Theory with Applications. Dordrecht: Reidel., pp. 117–36.Google Scholar

McClennen, E. 1990. Rationality and Dynamic Choice: Foundational Explorations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

McCloskey, D. 1983. “The Rhetoric of Economics.” Journal of Economic Literature 21: 481–517.Google Scholar

McCloskey, D. 1985a. The Rhetoric of Economics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

McCloskey, D. 1985b. “Sartorial Epistemology in Tatters: A Reply to Martin Hollis.” Economics and Philosophy 1: 134–8.Google Scholar

McCloskey, D. 1987. The Writing of Economics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

McCloskey, D. 1988a. “Thick and Thin Methodologies in the History of Economic Thought,” in de Marchi, , ed. (1988), pp. 245–58.Google Scholar

McCloskey, D. 1988b. “Towards a Rhetoric of Economics,” in Winston, and Teichgraeber, , eds. (1988), pp. 13–29.Google Scholar

McCloskey, D. 1988c. “Two Replies and a Dialogue on the Rhetoric of Economics: Mäki, Rappaport, Rosenberg.” Economics and Philosophy 4: 150–66.Google Scholar

McCloskey, D. 1989. “The Very Idea of Epistemology: A Comment on Standards.” Economics and Philosophy 5: 1–6.Google Scholar

McCloskey, D. 1990. If You’re so Smart: The Narrative of Economic Expertise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

McKenzie, R. 1979. “The Non-Rational Domain and the Limits of Economic Analysis.” Southern Economic Journal 26: 145–57.Google Scholar

Malinvaud, E. 1972. Lectures on Microeconomic Theory, translated by A. Silvey. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar

Malinvaud, E. 1987. “The Overlapping Generations Model in 1947.” Journal of Economic Literature 25: 103–5.Google Scholar

Mankiw, G. 2006. “The Macroeconomist as Scientist and Engineer.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 20: 29–46.Google Scholar

Mantel, R. 1974. “On the Characterization of Aggregate Excess Demand.” Journal of Economic Theory 7: 348–53.Google Scholar

Marschak, J. 1969. “On Econometric Tools.” Synthese 20: 483–8.Google Scholar

Marshall, A. 1930. Principles of Economics. 8th ed. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Marwell, G. and Ames, R.. 1981. “Economists Free Ride. Does Anyone Else? Experiments on the Provision of Public Goods. IV.” Journal of Public Economics 15: 295–310.Google Scholar

Marx, K. 1867. Capital, vol. 1, translated by S. Moore and E. Aveling. New York: International Publishers, 1967.Google Scholar

Mas-Collel, A. 1974. “An Equilibrium Existence Theorem without Complete or Transitive Preferences.” Journal of Mathematical Economics 1: 237–46.Google Scholar

Mas-Collel, A., Whinston, M., and Green, J.. 1995. Microeconomic Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mason, W. 1980–1. “Some Negative Thoughts on Friedman’s Positive Economics.” Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics 3: 235–55.Google Scholar

Masterman, M. 1970. “The Nature of a Paradigm,” in Lakatos and Musgrave (1970), pp. 59–90.Google Scholar

Mauss, M. 1954. The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies, translated by I. Cunnison. London: Cohen and West.Google Scholar

Meckling, W. 1960a. “An Exact Consumption-Loan Model of Interest: A Comment.” Journal of Political Economy 68: 72–6.Google Scholar

Meckling, W. 1960b. “Rejoinder.” Journal of Political Economy 68: 83–4.Google Scholar

Melitz, J. 1965. “Friedman and Machlup on the Significance of Testing Economic Assumptions.” Journal of Political Economy 73: 37–60.Google Scholar

Menger, C. 1883. Problems of Economics and Sociology, Schneider, L., ed., translated by F. Nock. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Merton, R. 1957. Social Theory and Social Structure. Glenco, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Mill, J. 1820. An Essay on Government, Shields, Currin V., ed. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1955.Google Scholar

Mill, J. S. 1836a. “On the Definition of Political Economy and the Method of Investigation Proper to It.” Repr. in J. Robson, ed. Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vol. 4. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1967, pp. 309–39.Google Scholar

Mill, J. S. 1836b. “Of the Influence of Consumption on Production,” in J. Robson, ed. Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vol. 4. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1967, pp. 262–70.Google Scholar

Mill, J. S. 1843. A System of Logic. London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1949.Google Scholar

Mill, J. S. 1848. Principles of Political Economy with some of their Applications to Social Philosophy. Rpt. EconLib. https://www.econlib.org/library/Mill/mlP.htmlGoogle Scholar