Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T17:10:13.532Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Cooperation, Competition, and Regulation in the United States, 1893–1945

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2014

Jonathan Silberstein-Loeb
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

Although the increase in competition that telegraphy generated during the 1840s encouraged newspapers to cooperate, the limited reach of the nascent communications network, and the consequent costs of coordination among a large group of publishers, kept participation in these early news organizations small, personal, and regional. Limited telegraph bandwidth, and then opportunistic behavior, prevented the loose federation of news associations that emerged after the Civil War from establishing a comprehensive nationwide organization. Yet, by 1897, the operations of the Associated Press not only encompassed the territory from the East Coast to the West, it had eliminated potential rivals and consolidated its control over the newsgathering business of the country. The path to the establishment of a nationwide news association lay not through merger or horizontal integration, but through the maintenance of exclusivity and the elimination of competitors.

The Formation and Ascendance of the AP

Following disagreeable revelations about the secret agreements between the WAP and UPA, Lawson and several Midwestern publishers fulminated a rearrangement of relations that would better serve their interests and protect their exclusive franchises. Their efforts culminated in December 1892 with the incorporation of the AP in Chicago, which that year surpassed Philadelphia as the second largest city in the United States. The AP charter entitled the association to not only to “buy, gather and accumulate information and news; to vend, supply, distribute and publish the same,” but also “to purchase, erect, lease operate, and sell telegraph and telephone lines and other means of transmitting news; to publish periodicals; to make and deal in periodicals.” The AP reserved the right to erect and operate telegraphs for fear that relations with Western Union might sour or that Western Union might either raise its rates or enter the news business. In other respects, the new association was much the same as the WAP, save that Lawson was in charge. Initially, Lawson and his friends contemplated the continuance of an integrated two-firm solution, believing that closer cooperation between Chicago and New York might advantageously stifle competition from hostile third parties. During the winter of 1892–1893, Lawson drew up the bylaws of the AP in conjunction with executives of the UPA.

Type
Chapter
Information
The International Distribution of News
The Associated Press, Press Association, and Reuters, 1848–1947
, pp. 46 - 87
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Lehmann, F.W., Laws of the Associated Press (New York, 1909), p. 41Google Scholar
Stone, C., Dana and the Sun (New York: Dodd, Mead & Co., 1938), p. 44Google Scholar
Peritz, R.J.R., Competition Policy in America, 1888–1992 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996), p. 28Google Scholar
Swindler, W.F., “The AP Anti-trust Case in Historical Perspective,” Journalism Quarterly, 23:1 (March 1946), 47Google Scholar
Hovenkamp, H., Enterprise and American Law, 1836–1937 (London: Harvard University Press, 1991), p. 285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyman, B., “Competition and the Law,” Harvard Law Review 15 (February 1902), 431–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyman, B., “The Law of the Public Callings as a Solution to the Trust Problem. II,” Harvard Law Review, 17 (February 1904), 299Google Scholar
Cumming, R.C., Membership and Religious Corporations of New York (New York, 1896), pp. 75–154Google Scholar
Stone, M.E., Fifty Years a Journalist (London: Heinemann, 1922)Google Scholar
Lewin, J.H., “The Associated Press Decision: An Extension of the Sherman Act,” The University of Chicago Law Review, 13 (1946), 258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouckaert, B., “What is Property?,” Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 13 (1990), 16Google Scholar
Lurie, J., The Chicago Board of Trade, 1859–1905 (Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1979)Google Scholar
Belknap, G.N., “Oregon Sentinel Extras – 1858–1864,” Pacific Northwest Quarterly, 70 (October 1979), 178–80Google Scholar
Carter, J.D., “Before the Telegraph: The News Service of the San Francisco Bulletin, 1855–1861,” The Pacific Historical Review, 11 (1942), 301–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siebert, F.S., “Rights in news,” The Journalism Bulletin, 3 (November 1927), 45–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, R.A., “International News Service v. Associated Press: Custom and Law as Sources of Property Rights in News,” Virginia Law Review, 78 (1992), 94–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balganesh, S., “‘Hot News’: The Enduring Myth of Property in News,” Columbia Law Review, 111 (2011), 419–95Google Scholar
Westley, B., “How a Narrow Application of ‘Hot News’ Misappropriation Can Help Save Journalism,” American Univ. L. Rev., 60 (February 2011), 691–730Google Scholar
Roberts, K., “Antitrust Problems in the Newspaper Industry,” Harvard Law Review, 82 (December 1968), 332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villard, O.G., Some Newspapers and Newspaper-Men (New York: Alfred M. Knopf, 1923), p. 53Google Scholar
Vietor, R.H.K., Contrived Competition: Regulation and Deregulation in America (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trimble, V., The Astonishing Mr. Scripps: The Turbulent Life of America’s Penny Press Lord (Ames: Iowa State Press, 1992)Google Scholar
Knight, O., I Protest: Selected Disquisitions of E. W. Scripps (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1966)Google Scholar
McCabe, C., Damned Old Crank: A Self-Portrait of E. W. Scripps (New York: Harper, 1951)Google Scholar
McRae, M.A., Forty Years in Newspaperdom: The Autobiography of a Newspaper Man (New York: Brentano’s, 1925)Google Scholar
Morris, J.A., Deadline Every Minute: The Story of the United Press (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1957), p. 54Google Scholar
Owens, D.M., “The Associated Press,” The American Mercury, 10 (April 1927), 385–93Google Scholar
Noam, E., “The Tragedy of the Common Network: Theory for the Formation and Breakdown of Public Telecommunications” in Noam, E. and NiShuilleabhain, A. (eds.), Private Networks Public Objectives (Amsterdam: North Holland, 1996), p. 60Google Scholar
Stamm, M., Sound Business: Newspapers, Radio, and the Politics of New Media (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charnley, M.V., News by Radio (New York: Macmillan Co., 1948), p. 4Google Scholar
Allen, G., “New Media, Old Media, and Competition: Canadian Press and the Emergence of Radio News, 1922–1941,” in Allen, G. and Robinson, D.J. (eds.), Communicating in Canada’s Past: Essays in Media History (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2009), p. 56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilgrim, T.A., “Newspapers as Natural Monopolies: Some Historical Considerations,” Journalism History 18 (1992), 3Google Scholar
Nixon, R.B., “Trends in U.S. Newspaper Ownership: Concentration with Competition,” International Communication Gazette, 14 (1968), 186;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterlin, R.A., “Twentieth-century American Population Growth,” in Engerman, S.L. and Gallman, R.E. (eds.), The Cambridge Economic History of the United States, vol. 3: The Twentieth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), pp. 522–3Google Scholar
James, B., “A Pledge to Avoid Censorship,” International Herald Tribune, 25 June 1992Google Scholar
Brinkley, A., The End of Reform: New Deal Liberalism in Recession and War (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1995), p. 106Google Scholar
McCraw, T.K., “Regulation in America: a Review Article,” The Business History Review, 49 (1975), 161–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, N.W.H., “Recent Legislative Proposals to Classify Newspapers and Magazines as Public Utilities and to Regulate them Accordingly,” Virginia Law Review, 17 (1931), 705–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curran, K.J., “Exclusive Dealing and Public Policy,” The Journal of Marketing, 15 (1950), 142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catledge, T., My Life and The Times (New York: Harper & Row, 1971), p. 126Google Scholar
Blanchard, M.A., “The Associated Press Antitrust Suit: A Philosophical Clash over Ownership of First Amendment Rights,” The Business History Review 61 (1987), 43–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Sola Pool, I., Technologies of Freedom: On Free Speech in an Electronic Age (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1984)Google Scholar
Bruton, P.W., “United States v. Associated Press,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 92 (December 1943), 210Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×