Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2015
  • Online publication date: December 2015

15 - Retardation and anisotropic pairing

Summary

This chapter continues our discussion of superconductivity, considering the effects of repulsive interactions and the physics of anisotropic Cooper pairing. According to an apocryphal story, Landau is reputed to have said that “nobody has yet repealed Coulomb's law” [1]. In the BCS theory of superconductors, there is no explicit appearance of the the repulsive Coulomb interaction between paired electrons. How then do real-world superconductors produce electron pairs, despite the presence of the strong interaction between them?

This chapter we will examine two routes by which Nature is able to satisfy the Coulomb interaction. In conventional superconductors, the attraction between electrons develops because the positive screening charge created by the ionic lattice around an electron remains in place long after the electron has moved away. This process that gives rise to a short-time repulsion between electrons is followed by a retarded attraction which drives s-wave pairing. However, since the 1980s physicists have been increasingly fascinated by anisotropic superconductors. In these systems, it is the repulsive interaction between the fermions that drives the pairing. The mechanism by which this takes place is through the development of nodes in the pair wavefunction – often by forming a higher angular momentum Cooper pair. The two classic examples of this physics are the p-wave pairs of superfluid 3He and the d-wave pairs of cuprate high-temperature superconductors.

In truth, the physics community is still trying to understand the full interplay of superconductivity and the Coulomb force. The discovery of room-temperature superconductivity will surely involve finding a quantum material where strong correlations within the electron fluid lead to a large reduction in the sum total of kinetic and Coulomb energy.

BCS theory with momentum-dependent coupling

We now illustrate these two different ways in which superconductors “overcome” the Coulomb interaction, by returning to the more generalized version of BCS theory with a momentum-dependent interaction:

Notice how we have deliberately included a + sign in front of the interaction HI, to emphasize its predominantly repulsive character.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Introduction to Many-Body Physics
  • Online ISBN: 9781139020916
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139020916
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×
[1] V. L. Ginzburg, Landau's attitude toward physics and physicists, Physics Today, vol. 42, p. 54, no. 5 1989.
[2] A. Layzer and D. Fay, Superconducting pairing tendancy in nearly ferromagnetic systems, Int. J. Magn, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 135, 1971.
[3] M. T. Béal Monod, C. Bourbonnais, and V. J. Emery, Possible superconductivity in nearly antiferromagnetic itinerant fermion systems, Phys. Rev. B, vol. 34, p. 7716, 1986.
[4] K. Miyake, S. Schmitt-Rink, and C. M. Varma, Spin-fluctuation-mediated evenparity pairing in heavy-fermion superconductors, Phys. Rev. B, vol. 34, p. 6554, 1986.
[5] D. J. Scalapino, E. Loh, and J. E. Hirsch, d-wave pairing near a spin-density-wave instability, Phys. Rev. B, vol. 34, p. 8190, 1986.
[6] L. P. Pitaevskii, On the Superfluidity of liquid 3He, J. Exp. Theor. Phys., Vol. 10, p. 1267, 1960.
[7] D. J. Thouless, Perturbation theory in statistical mechanics and the theory of superconductivity, Ann. Phys., vol. 10, p. 553, 1960.
[8] V. J. Emery and A. M. Sessler, Possible phase transition in liquid 3He, Phys. Rev., vol. 119, p. 43, 1960.
[9] K. A. Brueckner, T. Soda, P. W. Anderson, and P. Morel, Level structure of nuclear matter and liquid 3He, Phys. Rev., vol. 118, p. 1442, 1960.
[10] P. W. Anderson and P. Morel, Generalized Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer states and the proposed low-temperature phase of liquid 3He, Phys. Rev., vol. 123, p. 1911, 1961.
[11] R. Balian and N. Werthamer, Superconductivity with pairs in a relative p-wave, Phys. Rev., vol. 131, p. 1, 1963.
[12] V. J. Emery, Theories of liquid helium three, Ann. Phys., vol. 28, no. 1, p. 1, 1964.
[13] W. Kohn and J. M. Luttinger, New mechanism for superconductivity, Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 15, p. 524, 1965.
[14] D. Fay and A. Layzer, Superfluidity of low density fermion systems, Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 20, no. 5, p. 187, 1968.
[15] D. D. Osheroff, R. C. Richardson, and D. M. Lee, Evidence for a new phase of solid 3He, Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 28, p. 885, 1972.
[16] D. D. Osheroff, W. J. Gully, R. C. Richardson, and D. M. Lee, New magnetic phenomena in liquid He3 below 3 mK, Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 29, p. 920, 1972.
[17] A. J. Leggett, Interpretation of recent results on He 3 below 3 mK: a new liquid phase?, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1972.
[18] A. J. Leggett, Microscopic theory of NMR in an anisotropic superfluid (3He A), Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 31, p. 352, 1973.
[19] A. J. Leggett, NMR lineshifts and spontaneously broken spin–orbit symmetry. I general concepts, J. Phys. C, vol. 6, p. 3187, 1973.
[20] W. F. Brinkman, J. W. Serene, and P. W. Anderson, Spin-fluctuation stabilization of anisotropic superfluid states, Phys. Rev. A: At., Mol., Opt. Phys. vol. 10, no. 6, p. 2386, 1974.
[21] F. Steglich, J. Aarts, C. D. Bredl,W. Leike, D. E. Meshida,W. Franz, and H. Schäfer, Superconductivity in the presence of strong Pauli paramagnetism: CeCu2 Si2, Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 43, p. 1892, 1979.
[22] D. Vollhardt and P. Wölfle, Superfluid Phases of Helium 3, Taylor and Francis, 1990.