Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T15:35:31.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Retardation and anisotropic pairing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2015

Piers Coleman
Piers Coleman
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, New Jersey
Get access

Summary

This chapter continues our discussion of superconductivity, considering the effects of repulsive interactions and the physics of anisotropic Cooper pairing. According to an apocryphal story, Landau is reputed to have said that “nobody has yet repealed Coulomb's law” [1]. In the BCS theory of superconductors, there is no explicit appearance of the the repulsive Coulomb interaction between paired electrons. How then do real-world superconductors produce electron pairs, despite the presence of the strong interaction between them?

This chapter we will examine two routes by which Nature is able to satisfy the Coulomb interaction. In conventional superconductors, the attraction between electrons develops because the positive screening charge created by the ionic lattice around an electron remains in place long after the electron has moved away. This process that gives rise to a short-time repulsion between electrons is followed by a retarded attraction which drives s-wave pairing. However, since the 1980s physicists have been increasingly fascinated by anisotropic superconductors. In these systems, it is the repulsive interaction between the fermions that drives the pairing. The mechanism by which this takes place is through the development of nodes in the pair wavefunction – often by forming a higher angular momentum Cooper pair. The two classic examples of this physics are the p-wave pairs of superfluid 3He and the d-wave pairs of cuprate high-temperature superconductors.

In truth, the physics community is still trying to understand the full interplay of superconductivity and the Coulomb force. The discovery of room-temperature superconductivity will surely involve finding a quantum material where strong correlations within the electron fluid lead to a large reduction in the sum total of kinetic and Coulomb energy.

BCS theory with momentum-dependent coupling

We now illustrate these two different ways in which superconductors “overcome” the Coulomb interaction, by returning to the more generalized version of BCS theory with a momentum-dependent interaction:

Notice how we have deliberately included a + sign in front of the interaction HI, to emphasize its predominantly repulsive character.

Type
Chapter
Information
Introduction to Many-Body Physics , pp. 542 - 581
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] V. L., Ginzburg, Landau's attitude toward physics and physicists, Physics Today, vol. 42, p. 54, no. 5 1989.Google Scholar
[2] A., Layzer and D., Fay, Superconducting pairing tendancy in nearly ferromagnetic systems, Int. J. Magn, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 135, 1971.Google Scholar
[3] M. T. Béal, Monod, C., Bourbonnais, and V. J., Emery, Possible superconductivity in nearly antiferromagnetic itinerant fermion systems, Phys. Rev. B, vol. 34, p. 7716, 1986.Google Scholar
[4] K., Miyake, S., Schmitt-Rink, and C. M., Varma, Spin-fluctuation-mediated evenparity pairing in heavy-fermion superconductors, Phys. Rev. B, vol. 34, p. 6554, 1986.Google Scholar
[5] D. J., Scalapino, E., Loh, and J. E., Hirsch, d-wave pairing near a spin-density-wave instability, Phys. Rev. B, vol. 34, p. 8190, 1986.Google Scholar
[6] L. P., Pitaevskii, On the Superfluidity of liquid 3He, J. Exp. Theor. Phys., Vol. 10, p. 1267, 1960.Google Scholar
[7] D. J., Thouless, Perturbation theory in statistical mechanics and the theory of superconductivity, Ann. Phys., vol. 10, p. 553, 1960.Google Scholar
[8] V. J., Emery and A. M., Sessler, Possible phase transition in liquid 3He, Phys. Rev., vol. 119, p. 43, 1960.Google Scholar
[9] K. A., Brueckner, T., Soda, P. W., Anderson, and P., Morel, Level structure of nuclear matter and liquid 3He, Phys. Rev., vol. 118, p. 1442, 1960.Google Scholar
[10] P. W., Anderson and P., Morel, Generalized Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer states and the proposed low-temperature phase of liquid 3He, Phys. Rev., vol. 123, p. 1911, 1961.Google Scholar
[11] R., Balian and N., Werthamer, Superconductivity with pairs in a relative p-wave, Phys. Rev., vol. 131, p. 1, 1963.Google Scholar
[12] V. J., Emery, Theories of liquid helium three, Ann. Phys., vol. 28, no. 1, p. 1, 1964.Google Scholar
[13] W., Kohn and J. M., Luttinger, New mechanism for superconductivity, Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 15, p. 524, 1965.Google Scholar
[14] D., Fay and A., Layzer, Superfluidity of low density fermion systems, Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 20, no. 5, p. 187, 1968.Google Scholar
[15] D. D., Osheroff, R. C., Richardson, and D. M., Lee, Evidence for a new phase of solid 3He, Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 28, p. 885, 1972.Google Scholar
[16] D. D., Osheroff, W. J., Gully, R. C., Richardson, and D. M., Lee, New magnetic phenomena in liquid He3 below 3 mK, Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 29, p. 920, 1972.Google Scholar
[17] A. J., Leggett, Interpretation of recent results on He 3 below 3 mK: a new liquid phase?, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1972.Google Scholar
[18] A. J., Leggett, Microscopic theory of NMR in an anisotropic superfluid (3He A), Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 31, p. 352, 1973.Google Scholar
[19] A. J., Leggett, NMR lineshifts and spontaneously broken spin–orbit symmetry. I general concepts, J. Phys. C, vol. 6, p. 3187, 1973.Google Scholar
[20] W. F., Brinkman, J. W., Serene, and P. W., Anderson, Spin-fluctuation stabilization of anisotropic superfluid states, Phys. Rev. A: At., Mol., Opt. Phys. vol. 10, no. 6, p. 2386, 1974.Google Scholar
[21] F., Steglich, J., Aarts, C. D., Bredl,W., Leike, D. E., Meshida,W., Franz, and H., Schäfer, Superconductivity in the presence of strong Pauli paramagnetism: CeCu2 Si2, Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 43, p. 1892, 1979.Google Scholar
[22] D., Vollhardt and P., Wölfle, Superfluid Phases of Helium 3, Taylor and Francis, 1990.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×