Skip to main content Accessibility help
Judicial Dialogue and Human Rights
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1
  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Buy the print book

Book description

This book offers a comprehensive analysis of the extent, method, purpose and effects of domestic and international courts' judicial dialogue on human rights. The analysis covers national courts' judicial dialogue from different regions of the world, including Eastern Europe, Latin America, Canada, Nigeria and Malaysia. The text is complemented by studies on specific subject matters such as LGTBI people's and asylum seekers' rights that further contribute to a better understanding of factors that stimulate or hold back judicial dialogue, and by first hand insights of domestic and European Court of Human Rights judges into their courts' involvement in judicial dialogue. The book features contributions from leading scholars and judges, whose combined perspectives provide an interesting and timely study.

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.


Page 1 of 2

Page 1 of 2

Adjami, M., ‘African Courts, International Law, and Comparative Case Law: Chimera or Emerging Human Rights Jurisprudence?’, Michigan Journal of International Law 24:1 (2002) 103169.
Ahdieh, R.B.Between Dialogue and Decree: International Review of National Courts’, New York University Law Review 79 (2004) 20292163.
Alford, R., ‘In Search of a Theory for Constitutional Comparativism’, University of California Law Review 52:3 (2005) 639715.
Alford, R., ‘Misusing International Sources to Interpret the Constitution’, American Journal of International Law 98:1 (2004) 5769.
Ambrus, M.Comparative Law Method in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights in the Light of the Rule of Law’, Erasmus Law Review 2:3 (2009) 353371.
Andenæs, M. and Fairgrieve, D. (eds.), Courts and Comparative Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).
Arnold, R. (ed.), The Universalism of Human Rights, Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspective on Law and Justice (Berlin: Springer, 2013).
Bahdi, R., ‘Globalisation of Judgment: Transjudicialism and the Five Faces of International Law in Domestic Courts’, George Washington International Law Review 34 (2002) 555588.
Bederman, D. J., ‘Diversity and Permeability in Transnational Governance’, Emory Law Journal 57:1 (2007) 201233.
Benhabib, S., Another Cosmopolitanism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).
Benvenisiti, E. and Downs, G., ‘Towards Global Checks and Balances’, Constitutional Political Economy 20:3–4 (2009) 366387.
Alford, R., ‘The Democratising Effects of Transjudicial Coordination’, Utrecht Law Review 8:2 (2012) 158171.
Berman, P. S., ‘A Pluralist Approach to International Law’, Yale Journal of International Law 32:2 (2007) 301330.
Bingham, T. H., Widening Horizons: The Influence of Comparative Law and International Law on Domestic Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).
Black, R. and Epstein, L., ‘(Re-)Setting the Scholarly Agenda on Transjudicial Communication’, Law and Social Inquiry 32:3 (2007) 789807.
Bobek, M., Comparative Reasoning in European Supreme Courts (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).
Bohmer, M., ‘Use of Foreign Law as a Strategy to Build Constitutional and Democratic Authority’, Revista Jurídica de la Universidad de Puerto Rico 77: 411 (2008) 411432.
Bratza, N., ‘The European Convention on Human Rights and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union: A Process of Mutual Enrichment’, Rosas, A. et al. (eds.), The Court of Justice and the Construction of Europe: Analyses and Perspectives on Sixty Years of Case-law (The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2013) 167181.
Brock, G. (ed.), Cosmopolitanism versus Non-Cosmopolitanism: Critiques, Defenses, Reconceptualizations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).
Brok, R., Coercing Virtue: The Worldwide Rule of Judges (Cambridge, MA: Aei Press, 2003).
Bryde, B., ‘The Constitutional Judge and the International Constitutionalist Dialogue’, Tulane Law Review 80:1 (2005) 203219.
Buergenthal, T., ‘Modern Constitutions and Human Rights Treaties’, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 36:1–2 (1998) 211223.
Burke-White, W., ‘International Legal Pluralism’, Michigan Journal of International Law 25:4 (2004) 963980.
Buxbaum, H., ‘From Empire to Globalization … and Back? A Post-Colonial View of Transjudicialism’, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 11:1 (2004) 183189.
Calabresi, S. and Dotson Zimdahl, S., ‘The Supreme Court and Foreign Sources of Law: Two Hundred Years of Practice and the Juvenile Death Penalty Decision’, William and Mary Law Review 47:3 (2005) 743909.
Canivet, G., Andenæs, M. and Fairgrieve, D. (eds.), Comparative Law Before the Courts (London: British Institute for International and Comparative Law, 2004).
Carozza, P., ‘Uses and Misuses of Comparative Law in International Human Rights: Some Reflections on the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights’, Notre Dame Law Review 73:5 (1998) 12171237.
Cartabia, M., ‘Europe and Rights: Taking Dialogue Seriously’, European Constitutional Law Review 5:1 (2009) 531.
Chang, W.-C., ‘The Convergence of Constitutions and International Human Rights: Taiwan and South Korea Comparisons’, North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation 36:3 (2011) 593625.
Choudhry, S. (ed.), The Migration of Constitutional Ideas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).
Alford, R., ‘Globalization in Search of Justification: Toward a Theory of Comparative Constitutional InterpretationIndiana Law Journal 74:3 (1999) 819892.
Christoffersen, J., Fair Balance: Proportionality, Subsidiarity and Primarity in the European Convention on Human Rights (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2009).
Claes, M. and de Visser, M.Are You Networked Yet? On Dialogues in European Judicial Networks’, Utrecht Law Review 8:2 (2012) 100114.
Clark, R., Feldbrugge, F. and Pomorski, S. (eds.) International and National Law in Russia and Eastern Europe, Essays in Honor of George Ginsburgs (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 2001).
Claydon, J., ‘International Human Rights Law and the Interpretation of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms’, Supreme Court Law Review 4 (1982) 287302.
Coester, M., ‘Same-Sex Relationships: A Comparative Assessment of Legal Developments Across Europe’, European Journal of Law Reform 4:2 (2002) 585601.
Cohen, H. G., ‘Finding International Law, Part II: Our Fragmenting Legal Community’, New York University Journal of Law and Politics 44:4 (2012) 10491108.
Danilenko, G. M., Implementation of International Law in CIS States: Theory and Practice, European Journal of International Law 10:1 (1999) 5169.
de Burca, G. and Gerstenberg, O.The Denationalization of Constitutional Law’, Harvard International Law Journal 47:1 (2006) 243262.
Delmas-Marty, M., Ordering Pluralism. A Conceptual Framework for Understanding the Transnational Legal World (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2009).
Delmas-Marty, M., The European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights: International Versus National Restrictions (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1992).
Dorsen, N.The Relevance of Foreign Legal Materials in US Constitutional Cases: A Conversation between Justice Antonin Scalia and Justice Stephen Breyer’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 3:4 (2005) 519541.
Dunoff, J. L. and Trachtman, J. P. (eds.), Ruling the World: Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).
Duxbury, N., Judges and Jurists: An Essay on Influence (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2001).
Dzehtsiarou, K. European Consensus and the Legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).
Dzehtsiarou, K. and Lukashevich, V., ‘Informed Decision-Making: The Comparative Endeavours of the Strasbourg Court’, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 30:3 (2012) 272298.
Egede, E., ‘Bringing Human Rights Home: An Examination of the Domestication of Human Rights Treaties in Nigeria’, Journal of African Law 51:2 (2007) 249284.
Fauchald, O. K. and Nollkaemper, A. (eds.), The Practice of International and National Courts and the (De-)Fragmentation of International Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2012).
Ferrarese, M. R., ‘When National Actors Become Transnational: Transjudicial Dialogue between Democracy and Constitutionalism’, Global Jurist 9:1 (2009) 131.
Ferrari, G. and Gambaro, A., ‘The Italian Constitutional Court and Comparative Law. A Premise’, Comparative Law Review 1:1 (2010) 122.
Fischel De Andrade, J. H., ‘Regional Policy Approaches and Harmonization: A Latin American Perspective’, International Journal of Refugee Law 10:3 (1998) 389406.
Fischer-Lescano, A. and Teubner, G., ‘Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law’, Michigan Journal of International Law 25:4 (2004) 9991046.
Flanagan, B. and Ahern, S., ‘Judicial Decision-Making and Transnational Law: A Survey of Common Law Supreme Court Judges’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 60:1 (2011) 128.
Flogiatis, S., Zwart, T. and Fraser, J. (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights and its Discontents – Turning Criticism into Strength (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2013).
Føllesdal, A., Peters, B. and Ulfstein, G. (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights in a National, European and Global Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).
Fontana, D., ‘Refined Comparativism in Constitutional Law’, UCLA Law Review 49:2 (2001) 539623.
Fontanelli, F., Martinico, G. and Carrozza, P. (eds.), Shaping Rule of Law through Dialogue. International and Supranational Experiences (Groningen: Europa Law Publishing, 2010).
Forowicz, M., The Reception of International Law in the European Court of Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).
Frankenberg, G., ‘Comparing Constitutions: Ideas, Ideals and Ideology – Towards a Layered Narrative’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 4:3 (2006) 439459.
Gallo, D., Paladini, L. and Pustorino, P. (eds.), Same-Sex Couples before National, Supranational and International Jurisdictions (Berlin: Springer, 2014).
Gelter, M. and Siems, M., ‘Citations to Foreign Courts – Illegitimate and Superfluous, or Unavoidable? Evidence from Europe’, American Journal of Comparative Law 62:1 (2014) 3586.
Gelter, M. and Siems, M., ‘Language, Legal Origins, and Culture before the Courts: Cross-Citations between Supreme Courts in Europe’, Supreme Court Economic Review 21:1 (2013) 215269.
Gelter, M. and Siems, M., ‘Networks, Dialogue or One-Way Traffic? An Empirical Analysis of Cross-Citations between Ten European Supreme Courts’, Utrecht Law Review 8:2 (2012) 8899.
Gerber, D., ‘Globalization and Legal Knowledge: Implications for Comparative Law’, Tulane Law Review 75:4 (2000) 949975.
Ginsburg, T. and Dixon, R. (eds.), Comparative Constitutional Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2011).
Glensy, R., ‘Which Countries Count?: Lawrence v. Texas and the Selection of Foreign Persuasive Authority’, Virginia Journal of International Law 45:2 (2005) 357449.
Goodwin-Gill, G. S. and Lambert, H. (eds.), The Limits of Transnational Law: Refugee Law, Policy Harmonization and Judicial Dialogue in the European Union (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).
Groppi, T., ‘A User-Friendly Court. The Influence of Supreme Court of Canada Decisions Since 1982 on Court Decisions in Other Liberal Democracies’, Supreme Court Law Review 36 (2007) 337364.
Hallo de Wolf, A. and Wallace, D., ‘The Overseas Exchange of Human Rights Jurisprudence: The US Supreme Court in the European Court of Human Rights’, International Criminal Justice Review 19:3 (2009) 121.
Hamann, A. and Ruiz Fabri, H., ‘Transnational Networks and Constitutionalism’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 6:3–4 (2008) 481508.
Harding, S.Comparative Reasoning and Judicial Review’, Yale Journal of International Law 28 (2003) 409464.
Harris, D., et al. (eds.), Law of the European Convention on Human Rights, 3rd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).
Hart, N., ‘Complementary Protection and Transjudicial Dialogue: Global Best Practice or Race to the Bottom?’, International Journal of Refugee Law 28:2 (2016) 171209.
Helfer, L., ‘Consensus, Coherence and the European Convention on Human Rights’, Cornell International Law Journal 26:1 (1993) 133165.
Helfer, L., ‘Redesigning the European Court of Human Rights: Embeddedness as a Deep Structural Principle of the European Human Rights Regime’, European Journal of International Law 19:1 (2008) 125159.
Helfer, L., and Slaughter, A.-M., ‘Toward a Theory of Effective Supranational Adjudication’, Yale Law Journal, 107:2 (1997) 273391.
Henkin, L., ‘A New Birth of Constitutionalism: Genetic Influences and Genetic Defects’, Cardozo Law Review 14:3–4 (1993) 533547.
Heringa, A., ‘The Consensus Principle – The Role of “Common Law” in the ECHR Case Law’, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 3:2 (1996) 106145.
Hill, K., ‘Comparative Law, Law Reform and Legal Theory’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 9:1 (1989) 101115.
Hirji, Z. (ed.), Diversity and Plurality in Islam: Historical and Contemporary Discourses amongst Muslims (New York: IB Tauris, 2010).
Hirschl, R., ‘The Question of Case Selection in Comparative Constitutional Law’, American Journal of Comparative Law 53:1 (2005) 125156.
Jackson, V., ‘Constitutional Comparisons: Convergence, Resistance, Engagement’, Harvard Law Review 119:1 (2005) 109128.
Jackson, V., Constitutional Engagement in a Transnational Era (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).
Jacobs, F. G., ‘Judicial Dialogue and the Cross-Fertilization of Legal Systems: The European Court of Justice’, Texas International Law Journal 38:3 (2003) 547557.
Jaremba, U. and Mak, E., ‘Interviewing Judges in the Transnational Context’, Law and Method 5 (2014) 115.
Keller, H. and Stone-Sweet, A. (eds.), A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).
Kennedy, D., ‘One, Two, Three, Many Legal Orders: Legal Pluralism and the Cosmopolitan Dream’, New York University Review of Law & Social Change 31:3 (2007) 641660.
Killander, M. (ed.), International Law and Human Rights Litigation in Africa (Cape Town: Pretoria University Law Press, 2010).
King, M. and Thornhill, C. (eds.), Luhmann on Law and Politics: Critical Appraisals and Applications (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2006).
Kirby, M., ‘Commentaries: Transnational Judicial Dialogue, Internationalisation of Law and Australian Judges’, Melbourne Journal of International Law 9:1 (2008) 171189.
Kirby, M., ‘Domestic Courts and International Human Rights Law: The Ongoing Judicial Conversation’, Utrecht Law Review 6:1 (2010) 168181.
Koch, C., ‘Judicial Dialogue for Legal Multiculturalism’, Michigan Journal of International Law 25:4 (2003–2004) 879903.
Koh, H., ‘International Law as Part of Our Law’, American Journal of International Law 98:1 (2004) 4357.
Koskenniemi, M., ‘The Fate of Public International Law: Between Technique and Politics’, Modern Law Review 70:1 (2007) 130.
Krotoszynski, R., ‘“I’d Like the World to Sing (in Perfect Harmony)”: International Judicial Dialogue and the Muses – Reflections in the Perils and the Promise of International Judicial Dialogue’, Michigan Law Review 104:6 (2006) 13211359.
Kurczewski, J. and Sullivan, B.The Bill of Rights and the Emerging Democracies’, Law and Contemporary Problems 65:2 (2002) 251294.
L’Heurreux-Dube, C., ‘The Importance of Dialogue: Globalization and the International Impact of the Rehnquist Court’, Tulsa Law Journal 34:15 (1998) 1540.
La Forest, G. V., ‘The Expanding Role of the Supreme Court of Canada in International Law Issues’, Canadian Yearbook of International Law 34 (1996) 89102.
Lambert, H., ‘Transnational Judicial Dialogue, Harmonization and the Common European Asylum System’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 58:3 (2009) 519543.
Larson, J., ‘Importing Constitutional Norms from a “Wider Civilisation”: Lawrence, the Rehnquist Court’s Use of Foreign and International Law in Domestic Constitutional Interpretation’, Ohio State Law Journal 65:5 (2004) 12831329.
Lavranos, N., ‘The Solange-Method as a Tool for Regulating Competing Jurisdictions Among International Courts and Tribunals’, Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review 30:3 (2008) 275334.
Law, D. S. and Chang, W.-C., ‘The Limits of Global Judicial Dialogue’, Washington Law Review 86:3 (2011) 523578.
Law, D. S. and Versteeg, M., ‘The Declining Influence of the United States Constitution’, New York University Law Review 87:3 (2012) 762858.
Lazega, E.Mapping Judicial Dialogue Across National Borders: An Explanatory Network Study of Learning from Lobbying among European Intellectual Property Judges’, Utrecht Law Review 8:2 (2012) 115128.
Levit, J. K., ‘Bottom-Up International Lawmaking: Reflections on the New Haven School of International Law’, Yale Journal of International Law 32:2 (2007) 393420.
Likosky, M. (ed.), Transnational Legal Processes: Globalisation and Power Disparities (London: Butterworths, 2002).
Lyke, S. B., ‘Brown Abroad: An Empirical Analysis of Foreign Judicial Citation and the Metaphor of Cosmopolitan Conversation’, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 45:1 (2012) 83144.
MacGregor, E. F. and Gil, R. S., ‘Foreign Precedents in Mexican Constitutional Adjudication’, Mexican Law Review 4:2 (2012) 293307.
MacIntyre, J. M., ‘The Use of American Cases in Canadian Courts’, University of British Columbia Law Review 2:3 (1964–1966) 478490.
Mahoney, P., Matscher, F. and Petzold, H. (eds.), Protecting Human Rights: The European Perspective. Studies in Memory of Rolv Ryssdal (Köln: Carl Heymanns Verlag KG, 2000).
Mak, E., ‘Why do Dutch and UK Judges Cite Foreign Law?’, Cambridge Law Journal 70:2 (2011) 420450.
Mak, E., Judicial Decision-Making in a Globalised World: A Comparative Analysis of the Changing Practices of Western Highest Courts (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2013).
Manfredi, C.P., ‘The Use of United States Decisions by the Supreme Court of Canada under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms’, Canadian Journal of Political Science 23:3 (1990) 499518.
Markesinis, B. and Fedtke, J., Engaging with Foreign Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).
Markesinis, B. and Fedtke, J., Judicial Recourse to Foreign Law (Abingdon: Routledge, 2006).
Marochkin, S. Y., ‘International Law in the Courts of the Russian Federation: Practice of Application’, Chinese Journal of International Law 6:2 (2007) 329344.
Martinek, M., ‘Comparative Jurisprudence – What Good Does It Do – History, Tasks, Methods, Achievements and Perspectives of an Indispensable Discipline of Legal Research and Education’, Journal of South African Law 1 (2013) 3957.
Martinez, J. S., ‘Towards an International Judicial System’, Stanford Law Review 56:2 (2003) 429529.
Martinico, G. and Pollicino, O., The Interaction between Europe’s Legal Systems. Judicial Dialogue and the Creation of Supranational Laws (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2012).
McCormick, P., ‘Waiting for Globalization: An Empirical Study of the McLachlin Court’s Foreign Judicial Citations’, Ottawa Law Review 41:2 (2010) 209244.
McCrudden, C., ‘Common Law of Human Rights?: Transnational Judicial Conversations on Constitutional Rights’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 20:4 (2000) 499532.
Merry, S. E., ‘From Law and Colonialism to Law and Globalization: A Review Essay on Martin Chanok, Law, Custom, and Social Order: The Colonial Experience in Malawi and Zambia Zambia’, Law and Social Inquiry 28:2 (2003) 269290.
Michaels, R., ‘Global Legal Pluralism’, Annual Review of Law and Social Science 5 (2009) 135.
Muller, S. and Richards, S. (eds.), Highest Courts and Globalisation (The Hague: Asser Press, 2010).
Müllerson, R., Fitzmaurice, M. and Andenæs, M. (eds.), Constitutional Reforms and International Law in Central and Eastern Europe (The Hague: Brill, 1997).
Murphy, C., ‘Human Rights Law and the Challenges of Explicit Judicial Dialogue’, Jean Monnet Working Paper, NYU School of Law 12:10 (2012) 132.
Murray, J. L., ‘Judicial Cosmopolitanism’, Judicial Studies Institute Journal 8:2 (2008) 117.
Neuman, G., ‘Import, Export, and Regional Consent in the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’, European Journal of International Law 19:1 (2008) 101123.
Neuman, G., ‘The Uses of International Law in Constitutional Interpretation’, American Journal of International Law 98:1 (2004) 8291.
Neves, M., Transconstitucionalismo (São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2009).
Nollkaemper, A., ‘The Role of Domestic Courts in the Case Law of the International Court of Justice?’, Chinese Journal of International Law 5:2 (2006) 301322.
Nollkaemper, A., National Courts and the International Rule of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).
Örücü, E. (ed.), Judicial Comparativism in Human Rights Cases (London: British Institute for International and Comparative Law, 2003).
Osiatynski, W., ‘Paradoxes of Constitutional Borrowing’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 1:2 (2003) 244268.
Palombella, G. and Walker, N. (eds.), Relocating the Rule of Law (Portland: Hart Publishing, 2009).
Peters, A., ‘Supremacy Lost: International Law Meets Domestic Constitutional Law’, Vienna Online Journal on International Constitutional Law 3:3 (2009) 170198.
Petrov, R. and Kalinichenko, P., ‘The Europeanization of Third Country Judiciaries through the Application of the EU Aquis: The Cases of Russia and Ukraine’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 60:2 (2011) 325353.
Posner, E. A. and Sunstein, C. R., ‘The Law of Other States’, Stanford Law Review 59:1 (2006) 131179.
Prost, M., ‘All Shouting the Same Slogans: International Law’s Unity and the Politics of Fragmentation’, Finnish Yearbook of International Law 17 (2006) 129.
Ramsey, M., ‘International Materials and Domestic Rights: Reflections on Atkins and Lawrence’, American Journal of International Law 98:1 (2004) 6982.
Roach, K., ‘Constitutional, Remedial and International Dialogues about Rights: The Canadian Experience’, Texas Journal of International Law 40:3 (2004–2005) 537577.
Roberts, A., ‘Comparative International Law? The Role of National Courts in Creating and Enforcing International Law’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 60:1 (2011) 5793.
Romano, C., ‘Deciphering the Grammar of the International Jurisprudential Dialogue’, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 41:4 (2008) 755787.
Rosenkrantz, C. F., ‘Against Borrowings and Other Non-Authoritative Uses of Foreign Law’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 1:2 (2003) 269295.
Rozakis, C., ‘The European Judge as Comparatist’, Tulane Law Review 80:1 (2005–2006) 257279.
Sadurski, W., ‘Partnering with Strasbourg: Constitutionalisation of the European Court of Human Rights, the Accession of Central and East European States to the Council of Europe, and the Idea of Pilot Judgments’, Human Rights Law Review 9:3 (2009) 397453.
Schultz, T., ‘Carving up the Internet: Jurisdiction, Legal Orders, and the Private/Public International Law Interface’, European Journal of International Law 19:4 (2008) 799839.
Senden, H., Interpretation of Fundamental Rights in a Multilevel Legal System: An Analysis of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union (Cambridge: Intersentia, 2011).
Shany, Y., ‘National Courts as International Actors: Jurisdictional Implications’, Rivista di Diritto Pubblico Italiano, Comunitario e Comparato 15:1 (2009) 131.
Shelton, D. (ed.), International Law and Domestic Legal Orders, Incorporation, Transformation and Persuasion (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).
Slaughter, A.-M., ‘A Global Community of Courts’, Harvard International Law Journal 44:1 (2003) 191291.
Slaughter, A.-M., A New World Order (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004).
Slaughter, A.-M., ‘A Typology of Transjudicial Communication’, University of Richmond Law Review 29:1 (1994–1995) 99139.
Slaughter, A.-M., ‘Judicial Globalization’, Virginia Journal of International Law 40:4 (2000) 11031124.
Slaughter, A.-M., ‘The Real New World Order’, Foreign Affairs 76:5 (1997) 183197.
Slaughter, A.-M., Stone Sweet, A. and Weiler, J. (eds.), The European Court and National Courts: Doctrine and Jurisprudence. Legal Change in Its Social Context (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1998).
Sloss, D. (ed.), The Role of Domestic Courts in Treaty Enforcement: A Comparative Study (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).
Smith, A., ‘Making Itself at Home: Understanding Foreign Law in Domestic Jurisprudence: The Indian Case’, Berkeley Journal of International Law 24:1 (2006) 218273.
Smith, J. and Wiest, D., ‘The Uneven Geography of Global Civil Society: National and Global Influences on Transnational Association’, Social Forces 84:2 (2005) 621652.
Smithey, S. I., ‘A Tool, Not A Master. The Use of Foreign Case Law in Canada and South Africa’, Comparative Political Studies 34:10 (2001) 11881211.
Staes, D., ‘The Use of Documents Other than the European Convention on Human Rights and Its Protocols before the European Court of Human Rights. Reflections From and Upon a Users’ Perspective’, Human Rights and International Legal Discourse 2 (2014) 186214.
Stephan, P. B., ‘Courts on Courts: Contracting for Engagement and Indifference in International Judicial Encounters’, Virginia Law Review 100:1 (2014) 17111.
Strauss, A., ‘Beyond National Law: The Neglected Role of International Law of Personal Jurisdiction in Domestic Courts’, Harvard International Law Journal 36:2 (1995) 373425.
Teubner, G. (ed.), Global Law without a State (Brookfield: Dartmouth Pub Co, 1996).
Treves, T., et al. (eds.), Civil Society, International Courts and Compliance Bodies (The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2005).
Tripathi, P.Foreign Precedents and Constitutional Law’, Columbia Law Review 57:3 (1957) 319347.
Trochev, A., ‘All Appeals Lead to Strasbourg? Unpacking the Impact of the European Court of Human Rights on RussiaDemokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization 17:2 (2009) 145178.
Tushnet, M.The Possibilities of Comparative Constitutional Law’, Yale Law Journal 108:6 (1999) 12251309.
Twining, W., ‘Diffusion of Law: A Global Perspective’, (2004) Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 36:49 (2004) 145.
Voeten, E., ‘Borrowing and Non-borrowing among International Courts’, The Journal of Legal Studies 39:2 (2010) 547576.
von Bogdandy, A., ‘Pluralism, Direct Effect, and the Ultimate Say: On the Relationship between International and Domestic Constitutional Law’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 6:3–4 (2008) 397413.
Voßkuhle, A., ‘Multilevel Cooperation of the European Constitutional Courts: Der Europäische Verfassungsgerichtsverbund’, European Constitutional Review 6:2 (2010) 175198.
Waaldijk, K., ‘Others May Follow: The Introduction of Marriage, Quasi-Marriage and Semi-Marriage for Same-Sex Couples in Europe’, New England Law Review 38:3 (2003–2004) 569589.
Waldron, J., ‘Foreign Law and the Modern Ius Gentium’, Harvard Law Review 119:1 (2005) 125147.
Walker, N., ‘Beyond Boundary Disputes and Basic Grids: Mapping the Global Disorder of Normative Orders’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 6:3–4 (2008) 373396.
Waters, M. A., ‘Creeping Monism: The Judicial Trend Toward Interpretive Incorporation of Human Rights Treaties’, Columbia Law Review 107:3 (2007) 628706.
Waters, M. A., ‘Mediating Norms and Identity: The Role of Transnational Judicial Dialogue in Creating and Enforcing International Law’, Georgetown Law Journal 93:2 (2005) 487574.
Waters, M. A., ‘Normativity in the “New” Schools: Assessing the Legitimacy of International Legal Norms Created by Domestic Courts’, Yale Journal of International Law 32:2 (2007) 455484.
Weisbrud, M., ‘Using International Law to Interpret National Constitutions – Conceptual Problems: Reflections on Justice Kirby’s Advocacy of International Law in Domestic Constitutional Interpretation’, American University International Law Review 21:3 (2006) 365379.
Wells, M., ‘International Norms in Constitutional Law’, Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 32:2 (2004) 429436.
Wildhaber, L., ‘The European Convention on Human Rights and International Law’, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 56:2 (2007) 217231.
Wildhaber, L., Hjartarson, A. and Donnelly, S., ‘No Consensus on Consensus? The Practice of the European Court of Human Rights’, Human Rights Law Journal 33:7–12 (2013) 248263.
Young, M. (ed.), Regime Interaction in International Law: Facing Fragmentation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).