References
This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.
D. Moeckli , Human Rights and Non-Discrimination in the ‘War on Terror ' (Oxford University Press, 2008
R.A. Wilson (ed.), Human Rights in the War on Terror (Cambridge University Press, 2005
L. Paquette , ‘The Whistleblower as Underdog: What Protection Can Human Rights Offer in Massive Secret Surveillance?’, The Int’l J. of Human Rights 17:7–8 (2013) 796–809
R. Rubio-Marin (ed.), Human Rights and Immigration (Oxford University Press, 2014
A. Nolan (ed.), Economic, Social and Cultural Rights after the Global Financial Crisis (Cambridge University Press, 2014
A. Kentikelenis et al., ‘Greece’s Health Crisis: From Austerity to Denialism’, The Lancet 383 (2014) 748–53
G.S. Goodwin-Gill and H. Lambert (eds.), The Limits of Transnational Law – Refugee Law, Policy Harmonization and Judicial Dialogue in the European Union (Cambridge University Press, 2010
G. Martinico and O. Pollicino , The Interaction between Europe’s Legal Systems: Judicial Dialogue and the Creation of Supranational Laws (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2012
C. McCrudden , ‘A Common Law of Human Rights?: Transnational Judicial Conversations on Constitutional Rights’, Oxford J. of Legal Studies 20:4 (2000) 499–532
M. R. Ferrarese , ‘When National Actors Become Transnational: Transjudicial Dialogue between Democracy and Constitutionalism’, Global Jurist 9:1 (2009) 1–31
A. Roberts , ‘Comparative International Law? The Role of National Courts in Creating and Enforcing International Law’, Int’l and Comparative L. Quarterly 60:1 (2011) 57–93
A. Hol , ‘Highest Courts and Transnational Interaction – Introductory and Concluding Remarks’, Utrecht L. Rev. 8:2 (2012) 1–7
A. Nollkaemper , National Courts and the International Rule of Law (Oxford University Press, 2011
B. Zangl , ‘Is there an Emerging International Rule of Law?’, European Review 13 (2005) 73–91
M. Gelter and M. Siems , ‘Networks, Dialogue or One-Way Traffic? An Empirical Analysis of Cross-Citations Between Ten of Europe’s Highest Courts’, Utrecht L. Rev. 8:2 (2012) 88–99
G. Neuman , ‘The Uses of International Law in Constitutional Interpretation’, American J. of Int’l L. 98 (2004) 82–91
R. Alford , ‘Misusing International Sources to Interpret the Constitution’, American J. of Int’l L. 98 (2004) 57–69
M. Ramsey , ‘International Materials and Domestic Rights: Reflections on Atkins and Lawrence’, American J. of Int’l L. 98:1 (2004) 69–82
B. Flanagan and S. Ahern , ‘Judicial Decision-Making and Transnational Law: A Survey of Common Law Supreme Court Judges’, Int’l and Comparative L. Quarterly 60:1 (2011) 1–28
A. Lollini , ‘The South African Constitutional Court Experience: Reasoning Patterns Based on Foreign Law’, Utrecht L. Rev. 8 (2012) 55–88
M. Forovicz , The Reception of International Law in the European Court of Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 2010
B. Simma , ‘Mainstreaming Human Rights: The Contribution of the International Court of Justice’, J. of Int’l Dispute Settlement 3:1 (2012) 7–29
L. Helfer and A.-M. Slaughter , ‘Toward a Theory of Effective Supranational Adjudication’, Yale L. J. 107:2 (1997) 273–391, at 372–73
Y. Ghai , ‘Sentinels of Liberty or Sheep in Wolf’s Clothing? Judicial Politics and the Hong Kong Bill of Rights’, Modern L. Rev. 60:4 (1997) 459–81, at 479
G. M. Danilenko , ‘Implementation of International Law in CIS States: Theory and Practice’, European J. of Int’l L. 10:1 (1999) 51–69
L. Garlicki , M. Marsternak-Kubiak and K. Wójtowicz , ‘Poland’, D. Sloss (ed.) The Role of Domestic Courts in Treaty Enforcement: A Comparative Study (Cambridge University Press, 2009) 370–409, at 371–73
L. Sólyom , ‘The Role of Constitutional Courts in the Transition to Democracy: With Special Reference to Hungary’, International Sociology 18:1 (2003
J. Kurczewski and B. Sullivan , ‘The Bill of Rights and the Emerging Democracies, Law and Contemporary Problems’, Law and Contemporary Problems 65:2 (2002) 251–94
N. Chronowski , T. Drinóczi and I. Ernszt , ‘Hungary’, in D. Shelton (ed.) International Law and Domestic Legal Systems. Incorporation, Transformation and Persuasion (Oxford University Press: 2011) 256–87
M. Cartabia , ‘Europe and Rights: Taking Dialogue Seriously’, European Constitutional L. Rev. 5:1 (2009) 5–31
G. Letsas , ‘The ECHR as a Living Instrument: Its Meaning and Legitimacy’, A. Føllesdal et al. (eds.), Constituting Europe: The European Court of Human Rights in a National, European and Global Context (Cambridge University Press, 2013), 106–41
B. Flanagan and S. Ahern , ‘Judicial Decision-Making and Transnational Law: a Survey of Common Law Supreme Court Judges’, Int’l and Comp. L. Quarterly 60:1 (2011) 1–28
E. Mak , ‘Why Do Dutch and UK Judges Cite Foreign Law?’ Cambridge L. J. 70:2 (2011) 420–50
R. P. Alford , ‘Misusing International Sources to Interpret the Constitution’, Am. J. Int’l of L. 98:1 (2004) 57–69
C. McCrudden , ‘Common Law of Human Rights? Transnational Judicial Conversations on Constitutional Rights’, Oxford J. of Legal Studies 20:4 (2000) 499–532, at 512
J. Z. Benvindo , On the Limits of Constitutional Adjudication: Deconstructing Balancing and Judicial Activism (Berlin: Springer, 2010
Y. Roznai and S. Yolcu , ‘An Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendment ‘The Turkish Perspective: A Comment on the Turkish Constitutional Court’s Headscarf Decision’, Int’l J. of Constitutional L. 10:1 (2012) 175–207
M. Gelter and M. Siems , ‘Citations to Foreign Courts – Illegitimate and Superfluous, or Unavoidable? Evidence from Europe’, Am. J. Comparative L. 62:1 (2014) 35–86, at 64
S. Muller and S. Richards (eds.), Highest Courts and Globalisation (The Hague: Hague Academic Press, 2010
D. Muttart , The Empirical Gap in Jurisprudence: A Comprehensive Study of the Supreme Court of Canada, 2nd ed. (University of Toronto Press, 2007
G. P. Browne , The Judicial Committee and the British North America Act (University of Toronto Press, 1967
M. Gelter and M. M. Siems , ‘Language, Legal Origins, and Culture before the Courts: Cross-Citations between Supreme Courts in Europe’, Supreme Court Economic Rev. 21:1 (2013) 215–69
C.P. Manfredi , ‘The Use of United States Decisions by the Supreme Court of Canada under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms’, Canadian J. of Political Science 23:3 (1990) 499–518
Y. Dotan , ‘The Spillover Effect of Bills of Rights: A Comparative Assessment of the Impact of Bills of Rights in Canada and Israel’, American J. of Comparative L. 53:2 (2005) 293–341
W.S. Tarnopolsky , ‘The New Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms as Compared and Contrasted with the American Bill of Rights’, Human Rights Quarterly 5:3 (1983) 227–74
S. I. Smithey , ‘A Tool, Not A Master. The Use of Foreign Case Law in Canada and South Africa’, Comparative Political Studies 34:10 (2001) 1188–1211
M. Tushnet , ‘The Possibilities of Comparative Constitutional Law’, Yale L. J. 108:6 (1999) 1225–1309
C.L. Ostberg , M.E. Wetstein and C.R. Ducat , ‘Attitudes, Precedents, and Cultural Change: Explaining the Citation of Foreign Precedents by the Supreme Court of Canada’, Canadian J. of Political Science 34:2 (2001) 377–99
C. McCurdden , ‘A Common Law of Human Rights? Transnational Judicial Conversations on Constitutional Rights’, Oxford J. of Legal Studies 20:4 (2000) 499–532, at 499
M. A. Baderin , ‘Islam and the Realization of Human Rights in the Muslim World: A Reflection on Two Essential Approaches and Two Divergent Perspectives’, Muslim World J. of Human Rights 4:1 (2007): contribution 5, at 2
M. Rishmawi , ‘The Arab Charter on Human Rights and the League of Arab States: An Update’, Human Rights Law Review 10:1 (2010) 169–78, at 170
N.J Coulson , Succession in the Muslim Family (Cambridge University Press, 1971
W. Twining , ‘Diffusion of Law: A Global Perspective’, J. of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial L. 36:49 (2004) 1–45, at 4–5
H. Lambert , ‘Transnational Law, Judges and Refugees in the European Union’, G.S. Goodwin-Gill and H. Lambert (eds.), The Limits of Transnational Law: Refugee Law, Policy Harmonization and Judicial Dialogue in the European Union (Cambridge University Press, 2010) 1–16, at 4
S. Takahashi , ‘Recourse to Human Rights Treaty Bodies for Monitoring of the Refugee Convention’, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 20:1 (2002) 53–74, at 57
J.C. Hathaway , The Rights of Refugees under International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2005) at 1–2
J.-Y. Carlier and D. Vanheule , ‘Where is the Reference? On the Limited role of Transnational Dialogue in Belgian Refugee Law’, G. S. Goodwin-Gill and H. Lambert (eds.), The Limits of Transnational Law: Refugee Law, Policy Harmonization and Judicial Dialogue in the European Union (Cambridge University Press, 2010) 17–34, at 30–31
J. Vedsted-Hansen , ‘The Absence of Foreign Law in Danish Asylum Decisions – Quasi-Judicial Monologue with Domestic Policy Focus?’, G.S. Goodwin-Gill and H. Lambert (eds.), The Limits of Transnational Law: Refugee Law, Policy Harmonization and Judicial Dialogue in the European Union (Cambridge University Press, 2010) 170–85, at 179–82
R. Stern , ‘Foreign Law in Swedish Judicial Decision-making: Playing a Limited Role in Refugee Law Cases’, G.S. Goodwin-Gill and H. Lambert (eds.), The Limits of Transnational Law: Refugee Law, Policy Harmonization and Judicial Dialogue in the European Union (Cambridge University Press, 2010) 186–203, at 200–01
C. McCrudden , ‘A Common Law of Human Rights?: Transnational Judicial Conversations on Constitutional Rights’, Oxford J. Legal Studies 20:4 (2000) 499–532, at 511
J. McAdam , ‘The European Union Qualification Directive: The Creation of a Subsidiary Protection Regime’, Int’l J. Refugee L. 17:3 (2005) 461–516, at 462 and 466
E.R. Thielemann , ‘Why Asylum Policy Harmonization Undermines Refugee Burden-Sharing’, European J. Migration and Law 6:1 (2004) 47–66, at 54
L. Hodson , ‘A Marriage by Any Other Name? Schalk and Kopf v. Austria’, Human Rights Law Review 11:1 (2011) 170–79
M. P. Maduro , ‘Courts and Pluralism: Essay on a Theory of Judicial Adjudication in the Context of Legal and Constitutional Pluralism’, J.L. Dunoff and J.P. Trachtman (eds.), Ruling the World: Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance (Cambridge University Press, 2009) 356–79
C. Focarelli , International Law as Social Construct. The Struggle for Global Justice (Oxford University Press, 2012) at 316–21
A. von Bogdandy , ‘Pluralism, Direct Effect, and the Ultimate Say: On the Relationship between International and Domestic Constitutional Law’, Int’l J. of Constitutional L. 6:3–4 (2008) 397–413
J. Waldron , ‘The Core Case against Judicial Review’, Yale L. J. 115:6 (2006) 1346–1403, at 1395
P.M. Huber and A. Paulus , ‘Cooperation of Constitutional Courts in Europe: The Openness of the German Constitution to International, European, and Comparative Constitutional Law’, M. Andenæs and D. Fairgrieve (eds.), Courts and Comparative Law (Oxford University Press, 2015) 281–99
G. Tiberi , S. Ninatti and A. Osti , ‘The Legal Importance and Implementation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights in Italy’, G. Palmisano (ed.), Making the Charter of Fundamental Rights a Living Instrument (Leiden: Brill, 2015) 276–313, at 277
A. Voßkuhle , ‘Multilevel Cooperation of the European Constitutional Courts: Der Europäische Verfassungsgerichtsverbund’, European Constitutional Rev. 6:2 (2010) 175–198
L. Helfer , ‘Redesigning the European Court of Human Rights: Embeddedness as a Deep Structural Principle of the European Human Rights Regime’, European Journal of International Law 19:1 (2008) 125–59
E. Brems and L. Lavrysen , ‘Procedural Justice in Human Rights Adjudication’, Human Rights Quarterly 35:1 (2013) 176–200, at 195
M. Forowicz , The Reception of International Law in the European Court of Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 2010
A. Trochev , ‘All Appeals Lead to Strasbourg? Unpacking the Impact of the European Court of Human Rights on Russia’ Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization 17:2 (2009) 145–78
V. Starzhenetskii , ‘Assessing Human Rights in Russia: Not to Miss the Forest for the Trees’ Rev. of Central and East European L. 37:2–3 (2012) 349–458, at 351–52
K. Koroteev and S. Golubok , ‘Judgment of the Russian Constitutional Court on Supervisory Review in Civil Proceedings: Denial of Justice, Denial of Europe’, Human Rights Law Review 7:3 (2007) 619–32
A. Burkov , ‘How to Improve the Results of a Reluctant Player: The Case of Russia and the European Convention on Human Rights’, S. Flogiatis , T. Zwart and J. Fraser (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights and its Discontents – Turning Criticism into Strength (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2013) 147–57, at 154–55
W. Pomeranz and M. Gutbrod , ‘The Push for Precedent in Russia’s Legal System’, Rev. of Central and East European L. 37:1 (2012) 1–30
R. Black and L. Epstein , ‘(Re-)Setting the Scholarly Agenda on Transjudicial Communication’, Law & Social Inquiry 32:3 (2007) 789–807, at 805
R. Cichowski , ‘Civil Society and the European Court of Human Rights’, J. Christoffersen and M. Madsen (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics (Oxford University Press, 2011) 77–97
L. Van den Eynde , ‘An Empirical Look at the Amicus Curiae Practice of Human Rights NGOs before the European Court of Human Rights’, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 31:3 (2013) 271–314, at 278–79
R. Mackenzie , ‘The Amicus Curiae in International Courts: Towards Common Procedural Approaches?’, T. Treves et al. (eds.), Civil Society, International Courts and Compliance Bodies (The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2005) 295–311, at 303
P. Macalistair-Smith , ‘Non-Governmental Organizations, Humanitarian Action and Human Rights’, U. Beyerlin et al. (eds.), Recht Zwischen Umbruch und Bewahrung: Völkerrecht, Europarecht, Staatsrecht: Festschrift für Rudolf Bernhardt (Berlin: Springer, 1995) 477–502, at 477
M. Gelter and M. Siems , ‘Networks, Dialogue or One-Way Traffic? An Empirical Analysis of Cross-Citations between Ten of Europe’s Highest Courts’, Utrecht L. Rev. 8:2 (2012) 88–99, at 89
K. Dzehtsiarou and V. Lukashevich , ‘Informed Decision-Making: The Comparative Endeavours of the Strasbourg Court’, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 30:3 (2012) 272–98, at 279
C. McCrudden , ‘Common Law of Human Rights? Transnational Judicial Conversations on Constitutional Rights’, Oxford J. of Legal Studies 20:4 (2000) 499–532, at 522
B. Flanagan and S. Ahern , ‘Judicial Decision-Making and Transnational Law: A Survey of Common Law Supreme Court Judges’, Int’l and Comp. L. Quarterly 60:1 (2011) 1–28, at 22
H. Koh , ‘International Law as Part of Our Law’, American J. of Int’l L. 98 :1 (2004) 43–57
M. Forowicz , The Reception of International Law in the European Court of Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 2010
A Buyse , ‘Tacit Citing – The Scarcity of Judicial Dialogue between the Global and the Regional Human Rights Mechanisms in Freedom of Expression Cases’, T. McGonagle and Y. Donders (eds.), The United Nations and Freedom of Expression and Information: Critical Perspectives (Cambridge University Press, 2015) 443–65
A. Hamann and H. Ruiz Fabri , ‘Transnational Networks and Constitutionalism’, Int’l J. of Constitutional L. 6: 3–4 (2008) 481–508, at 498
A. Heringa , ‘The Consensus Principle – The Role of “Common Law” in the ECHR Case Law’, Maastricht J. of European and Comp. L. 3:2 (1996) 106–45, at 108
W. Sadurski , ‘Partnering with Strasbourg: Constitutionalisation of the European Court of Human Rights, the Accession of Central and East European States to the Council of Europe, and the Idea of Pilot Judgments’, Human Rights L. Rev. 9:3 (2009) 397–453, at 400
R. Hirschl , ‘The Question of Case Selection in Comparative Constitutional Law’, American J. of Comp. L. 53:1 (2005) 125–56, at 129
J. Hill , ‘Comparative Law, Law Reform and Legal Theory’, Oxford J. of Legal Studies 9:1 (1989) 101–15, at 111
B. Ackerman , ‘The Rise of World Constitutionalism’, Virginia L. Rev. 83:4 (1997) 771–97
P. Tripathi , ‘Foreign Precedents and Constitutional Law’, Columbia L. Rev. 57:3 (1957) 319–47, at 343
C. Saunders , ‘Judicial Engagement with Comparative Law’, T. Ginsburg and R. Dixon (eds.), Comparative Constitutional Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2011) 571–98
J. Smith and D. Wiest , ‘The Uneven Geography of Global Civil Society: National and Global Influences on Transnational Association’, Social Forces 84:2 (2005) at 621–52
H. Buxbaum , ‘From Empire to Globalization … and Back? A Post-Colonial View of Transjudicialism’, Indiana J. of Global Legal Studies 11:1 (2004) 183–89
O. De Schutter ‘Sur l’Emergence de la Société Civile dans le Droit International: le Rôle des Associations Devant la Cour Européenne des Droits de l’Homme’, European J. of Int’l L. 7:3 (1996) 372–410, at 396
K. Dzehtsiarou , European Consensus and the Legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights (Cambridge University Press, 2015
A. Bodnar , ‘Res Interpretata: Legal Effect of the European Court of Human Right’s Judgments for Other States Than Those Which Were Party to the Proceedings’, Y. Heack and E. Brems (eds.), Human Rights and Civil Liberties in the 21st Century (Dordrecht: Springer, 2014) 223–62
Kerr , ‘The Need for Dialogue between National Courts and the European Court of Human Rights, S. Flogaitis , T. Zwart and J. Fraser (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights and Its Discontents – Turning Criticism into Strength (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2013) 104–15, at 106–08
S.E. Merry , ‘From Law and Colonialism to Law and Globalization: A Review Essay on Martin Chanock, Law, Custom, and Social Order: The Colonial Experience in Malawi and Zambia’, Law and Social Inquiry 28:2 (2003) 269–90, at 10
H. P. Glenn , ‘Cosmopolitan Sources I: Constitutionalism’, H.P. Glenn (ed.) The Cosmopolitan State (Oxford University Press, 2013) 203–13, at 203
G. Brock , ‘Rethinking Cosmopolitanism versus Non-Cosmopolitanism Debate: An Introduction’, G. Brock (ed.), Cosmopolitanism versus Non-Cosmopolitanism: Critiques, Defenses, Reconceptualizations (Oxford University Press, 2013) 1–31
E.-U. Petersmann , ‘The WTO Constitution and Human Rights’, Journal of Int’l Economic L. 3:1 (2000) 19–25.
W. Sadurski et al. (eds.), Spreading Democracy and the Rule of Law?: The Impact of EU Enlargement on the Rule of law, Democracy and Constitutionalism in Post-communist Legal Orders (Dordrecht: Springer, 2006
M. Tushnet , ‘The Possibilities of Comparative Constitutional Law’, Yale L. J. 108:6 (1999) 1225–1309, at 1304
C. Marsan Raventós , ‘Data Retention and Security in Europe: Towards a New Right to Digital Privacy,’ C. M. Akrivopoulou and N. Garipidis (eds.) Human Rights and Risks in the Digital Era: Globalization and the Effects of Information Technologies (Hershey: IGI Global, 2012) 46–66
B.A. Ackerman , ‘The Storrs Lectures: Discovering the Constitution’, The Yale L. J. 93:6 (1984) 1013–72, at 1020
M. Gelter and M. Siems , ‘Network, Dialogue or One Way Traffic? An Empirical Analysis of Cross-Citations between Ten of Europe’s Highest Courts’, Utrecht L. Rev. 8:2 (2012) 88–99
D. Zaring , ‘The Use of Foreign Decisions by Federal Courts: An Empirical Analysis’, J. of Empirical Legal Studies 3:2 (2006) 297–331
U. Eco , ‘Metaphor, Dictionary and Encyclopedia’, New Literary History 15:2 (1984) 255–71, at 270
A. Paulus , ‘National Courts and the International Rule of Law – Remarks on the Book by André Nollkaemper’, Jerusalem Rev. of Legal Studies 4:1 (2012) 5–18
M. Koskenniemi , ‘The Fate of Public International Law: Between Technique and Politics’, Modern Law Review 70:1 (2007) 1–30, at 2–3
T. Schultz , ‘Carving up the Internet: Jurisdiction, Legal Orders, and the Private/Public International Law Interface’, European J. of Int’l L. 19:4 (2008) 799–839
A.-M. Slaughter , ‘The Real New World Order’, Foreign Affairs 76:5 (1997) 183–97, at 183
Y. Papadopoulos , ‘Problems of Democratic Accountability in Network and Multilevel Governance’, European L. J. 13:4 (2007) 469–86
A. von Bogdandy and P. Dann , ‘International Composite Administration: Conceptualizing Multi-Level and Network Aspects in the Exercise of International Public Authority’, A. von Bogdandy et al. (eds.), The Exercise of Public Authority by International Institutions (Berlin: Springer, 2010) 883–912
G. Teubner , ‘The Anonymous Matrix: Human Rights Violations by “Private” Transnational Actors’, Modern Law Review 69:3 (2006) 327–46, at 337
J. Holmes and M. Meyerhoff , ‘The Community of Practice: Theories and Methodologies in Language and Gender Research’, Language in Society 28:2 (1999) 173–83
M.V. Tushnet , ‘The Possibilities of Comparative Constitutional Law’, Yale L. J. 108:6 (1999) 1225–1310, at 1238
N.E.H. Hull , ‘Networks & Bricolage: A Prolegomenon to a History of Twentieth-Century American Academic Jurisprudence’, American J. of Legal History 35:3 (1991) 307–23, at 317–19
A.A. Leff , ‘The Leff Dictionary of Law: A Fragment’, Yale L. J. 94:8 (1985) 1855–2252, at 2212
T. Kayaoglu , ‘Trying Islam: Muslims before the European Court of Human Rights’, J. of Muslim Minority Affairs (2014) 34:4, 345–64
A. Nolan (ed.), Economic, Social and Cultural Rights after the Global Financial Crisis (Cambridge University Press, 2014
R. Alford , ‘Misusing International Sources to Interpret the Constitution’, American Journal of International Law 98:1 (2004) 57–69.
M. Andenæs and D. Fairgrieve (eds.), Courts and Comparative Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).
R. Arnold (ed.), The Universalism of Human Rights, Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspective on Law and Justice (Berlin: Springer, 2013).
E. Benvenisiti and G. Downs , ‘Towards Global Checks and Balances’, Constitutional Political Economy 20:3–4 (2009) 366–387.
T. H. Bingham , Widening Horizons: The Influence of Comparative Law and International Law on Domestic Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).
R. Black and L. Epstein , ‘(Re-)Setting the Scholarly Agenda on Transjudicial Communication’, Law and Social Inquiry 32:3 (2007) 789–807.
G. Brock (ed.), Cosmopolitanism versus Non-Cosmopolitanism: Critiques, Defenses, Reconceptualizations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).
H. Buxbaum , ‘From Empire to Globalization … and Back? A Post-Colonial View of Transjudicialism’, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 11:1 (2004) 183–189.
M. Cartabia , ‘Europe and Rights: Taking Dialogue Seriously’, European Constitutional Law Review 5:1 (2009) 5–31.
545 M. Claes and M. de Visser ‘Are You Networked Yet? On Dialogues in European Judicial Networks’, Utrecht Law Review 8:2 (2012) 100–114.
G. M. Danilenko , ‘Implementation of International Law in CIS States: Theory and Practice ’, European Journal of International Law 10:1 (1999) 51–69.
N. Dorsen ‘The Relevance of Foreign Legal Materials in US Constitutional Cases: A Conversation between Justice Antonin Scalia and Justice Stephen Breyer’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 3:4 (2005) 519–541.
J. L. Dunoff and J. P. Trachtman (eds.), Ruling the World: Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).
K. Dzehtsiarou European Consensus and the Legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).
K. Dzehtsiarou and V. Lukashevich , ‘Informed Decision-Making: The Comparative Endeavours of the Strasbourg Court’, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 30:3 (2012) 272–298.
E. Egede , ‘Bringing Human Rights Home: An Examination of the Domestication of Human Rights Treaties in Nigeria’, Journal of African Law 51:2 (2007) 249–284.
M. R. Ferrarese , ‘When National Actors Become Transnational: Transjudicial Dialogue between Democracy and Constitutionalism’, Global Jurist 9:1 (2009) 1–31.
J. H. Fischel De Andrade , ‘Regional Policy Approaches and Harmonization: A Latin American Perspective’, International Journal of Refugee Law 10:3 (1998) 389–406.
B. Flanagan and S. Ahern , ‘Judicial Decision-Making and Transnational Law: A Survey of Common Law Supreme Court Judges’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 60:1 (2011) 1–28.
S. Flogiatis , T. Zwart and J. Fraser (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights and its Discontents – Turning Criticism into Strength (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2013).
M. Forowicz , The Reception of International Law in the European Court of Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).
G. Frankenberg , ‘Comparing Constitutions: Ideas, Ideals and Ideology – Towards a Layered Narrative’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 4:3 (2006) 439–459.
M. Gelter and M. Siems , ‘Citations to Foreign Courts – Illegitimate and Superfluous, or Unavoidable? Evidence from Europe’, American Journal of Comparative Law 62:1 (2014) 35–86.
M. Gelter and M. Siems , ‘Language, Legal Origins, and Culture before the Courts: Cross-Citations between Supreme Courts in Europe’, Supreme Court Economic Review 21:1 (2013) 215–269.
M. Gelter and M. Siems , ‘Networks, Dialogue or One-Way Traffic? An Empirical Analysis of Cross-Citations between Ten European Supreme Courts’, Utrecht Law Review 8:2 (2012) 88–99.
T. Ginsburg and R. Dixon (eds.), Comparative Constitutional Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2011).
G. S. Goodwin-Gill and H. Lambert (eds.), The Limits of Transnational Law: Refugee Law, Policy Harmonization and Judicial Dialogue in the European Union (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).
A. Hallo de Wolf and D. Wallace , ‘The Overseas Exchange of Human Rights Jurisprudence: The US Supreme Court in the European Court of Human Rights’, International Criminal Justice Review 19:3 (2009) 1–21.
A. Hamann and H. Ruiz Fabri , ‘Transnational Networks and Constitutionalism’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 6:3–4 (2008) 481–508.
N. Hart , ‘Complementary Protection and Transjudicial Dialogue: Global Best Practice or Race to the Bottom?’, International Journal of Refugee Law 28:2 (2016) 171–209.
L. Helfer , ‘Redesigning the European Court of Human Rights: Embeddedness as a Deep Structural Principle of the European Human Rights Regime’, European Journal of International Law 19:1 (2008) 125–159.
L. Helfer , and A.-M. Slaughter , ‘Toward a Theory of Effective Supranational Adjudication’, Yale Law Journal, 107:2 (1997) 273–391.
A. Heringa , ‘The Consensus Principle – The Role of “Common Law” in the ECHR Case Law’, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 3:2 (1996) 106–145.
K. Hill , ‘Comparative Law, Law Reform and Legal Theory’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 9:1 (1989) 101–115.
R. Hirschl , ‘The Question of Case Selection in Comparative Constitutional Law’, American Journal of Comparative Law 53:1 (2005) 125–156.
M. Kirby , ‘Domestic Courts and International Human Rights Law: The Ongoing Judicial Conversation’, Utrecht Law Review 6:1 (2010) 168–181.
H. Koh , ‘International Law as Part of Our Law’, American Journal of International Law 98:1 (2004) 43–57.
M. Koskenniemi , ‘The Fate of Public International Law: Between Technique and Politics’, Modern Law Review 70:1 (2007) 1–30.
J. Kurczewski and B. Sullivan ‘The Bill of Rights and the Emerging Democracies’, Law and Contemporary Problems 65:2 (2002) 251–294.
H. Lambert , ‘Transnational Judicial Dialogue, Harmonization and the Common European Asylum System’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 58:3 (2009) 519–543.
E. Lazega ‘Mapping Judicial Dialogue Across National Borders: An Explanatory Network Study of Learning from Lobbying among European Intellectual Property Judges’, Utrecht Law Review 8:2 (2012) 115–128.
E. Mak , ‘Why do Dutch and UK Judges Cite Foreign Law?’, Cambridge Law Journal 70:2 (2011) 420–450.
C.P. Manfredi , ‘The Use of United States Decisions by the Supreme Court of Canada under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms’, Canadian Journal of Political Science 23:3 (1990) 499–518.
S. Y. Marochkin , ‘International Law in the Courts of the Russian Federation: Practice of Application’, Chinese Journal of International Law 6:2 (2007) 329–344.
550 G. Martinico and O. Pollicino , The Interaction between Europe’s Legal Systems. Judicial Dialogue and the Creation of Supranational Laws (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2012).
C. McCrudden , ‘Common Law of Human Rights?: Transnational Judicial Conversations on Constitutional Rights’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 20:4 (2000) 499–532.
S. E. Merry , ‘From Law and Colonialism to Law and Globalization: A Review Essay on Martin Chanok, Law, Custom, and Social Order: The Colonial Experience in Malawi and Zambia Zambia’, Law and Social Inquiry 28:2 (2003) 269–290.
R. Michaels , ‘Global Legal Pluralism’, Annual Review of Law and Social Science 5 (2009) 1–35.
S. Muller and S. Richards (eds.), Highest Courts and Globalisation (The Hague: Asser Press, 2010).
G. Neuman , ‘Import, Export, and Regional Consent in the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’, European Journal of International Law 19:1 (2008) 101–123.
G. Neuman , ‘The Uses of International Law in Constitutional Interpretation’, American Journal of International Law 98:1 (2004) 82–91.
A. Nollkaemper , ‘The Role of Domestic Courts in the Case Law of the International Court of Justice?’, Chinese Journal of International Law 5:2 (2006) 301–322.
A. Nollkaemper , National Courts and the International Rule of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).
W. Osiatynski , ‘Paradoxes of Constitutional Borrowing’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 1:2 (2003) 244–268.
R. Petrov and P. Kalinichenko , ‘The Europeanization of Third Country Judiciaries through the Application of the EU Aquis: The Cases of Russia and Ukraine’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 60:2 (2011) 325–353.
M. Ramsey , ‘International Materials and Domestic Rights: Reflections on Atkins and Lawrence’, American Journal of International Law 98:1 (2004) 69–82.
A. Roberts , ‘Comparative International Law? The Role of National Courts in Creating and Enforcing International Law’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 60:1 (2011) 57–93.
C. F. Rosenkrantz , ‘Against Borrowings and Other Non-Authoritative Uses of Foreign Law’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 1:2 (2003) 269–295.
W. Sadurski , ‘Partnering with Strasbourg: Constitutionalisation of the European Court of Human Rights, the Accession of Central and East European States to the Council of Europe, and the Idea of Pilot Judgments’, Human Rights Law Review 9:3 (2009) 397–453.
T. Schultz , ‘Carving up the Internet: Jurisdiction, Legal Orders, and the Private/Public International Law Interface’, European Journal of International Law 19:4 (2008) 799–839.
A.-M. Slaughter , ‘The Real New World Order’, Foreign Affairs 76:5 (1997) 183–197.
D. Sloss (ed.), The Role of Domestic Courts in Treaty Enforcement: A Comparative Study (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).
J. Smith and D. Wiest , ‘The Uneven Geography of Global Civil Society: National and Global Influences on Transnational Association’, Social Forces 84:2 (2005) 621–652.
S. I. Smithey , ‘A Tool, Not A Master. The Use of Foreign Case Law in Canada and South Africa’, Comparative Political Studies 34:10 (2001) 1188–1211.
T. Treves , et al. (eds.), Civil Society, International Courts and Compliance Bodies (The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2005).
P. Tripathi ‘Foreign Precedents and Constitutional Law’, Columbia Law Review 57:3 (1957) 319–347.
A. Trochev , ‘All Appeals Lead to Strasbourg? Unpacking the Impact of the European Court of Human Rights on Russia’ Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization 17:2 (2009) 145–178.
M. Tushnet ‘The Possibilities of Comparative Constitutional Law’, Yale Law Journal 108:6 (1999) 1225–1309.
W. Twining , ‘Diffusion of Law: A Global Perspective’, (2004) Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 36:49 (2004) 1–45.
E. Voeten , ‘Borrowing and Non-borrowing among International Courts’, The Journal of Legal Studies 39:2 (2010) 547–576.
A. von Bogdandy , ‘Pluralism, Direct Effect, and the Ultimate Say: On the Relationship between International and Domestic Constitutional Law’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 6:3–4 (2008) 397–413.
A. Voßkuhle , ‘Multilevel Cooperation of the European Constitutional Courts: Der Europäische Verfassungsgerichtsverbund’, European Constitutional Review 6:2 (2010) 175–198.
553 N. Walker , ‘Beyond Boundary Disputes and Basic Grids: Mapping the Global Disorder of Normative Orders’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 6:3–4 (2008) 373–396.
L. Wildhaber , ‘The European Convention on Human Rights and International Law’, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 56:2 (2007) 217–231.
