Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-18T20:10:40.227Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 2 - Definition of Fetal Growth Restriction and Uteroplacental Insufficiency

from Section 1 - Basic Principles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 July 2018

Christoph Lees
Affiliation:
Imperial College London
Gerard H. A. Visser
Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
Kurt Hecher
Affiliation:
University Medical Centre, Hamburg
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Redman, CW, Sargent, IL, Staff, AC. IFPA Senior Award Lecture: Making sense of preeclampsia – two placental causes of preeclampsia? Placenta 2014;35 Suppl:S20–5.Google Scholar
Poon, LC, Syngelaki, A, Akolekar, R, Lai, J, Nicolaides, KH. Combined screening for preeclampsia and small for gestational age at 11–13 weeks. Fetal Diagn Ther 2013;33(1):1627.Google Scholar
Akolekar, R, Syngelaki, A, Poon, L, Wright, D, Nicolaides, KH. Competing risks model in early screening for preeclampsia by biophysical and biochemical markers. Fetal Diagn Ther 2013;33(1):815.Google Scholar
Ganzevoort, W, Rep, A, Bonsel, GJ, De Vries, JI, Wolf, H, for the Pi. Dynamics and incidence patterns of maternal complications in early onset hypertension of pregnancy. BJOG 2007;114(6):741–50.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, S, Irgens, LM. Fetal growth and body proportion in preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 2003;101(3):575–83.Google Scholar
Melchiorre, K, Sharma, R, Thilaganathan, B. Cardiovascular implications in preeclampsia: An overview. Circulation 2014;130(8):703–14.Google Scholar
Roberts, JM, Cooper, DW. Pathogenesis and genetics of pre-eclampsia. Lancet 2001;357(9249):53–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Redman, CW, Sacks, GP, Sargent, IL. Preeclampsia: An excessive maternal inflammatory response to pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180(2 Pt 1):499506.Google Scholar
Pathak, S, Lees, CC, Hackett, G, Jessop, F, Sebire, NJ. Frequency and clinical significance of placental histological lesions in an unselected population at or near term. Virchows Arch 2011;459(6):565–72.Google Scholar
Kloosterman, GJ. On intrauterine growth – the significance of prenatal care. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1970;8(6 part 2):895912.Google Scholar
Unterscheider, J, Daly, S, Geary, MP, Kennelly, MM, McAuliffe, FM, O’Donoghue, K, et al. Optimizing the definition of intrauterine growth restriction: The multicenter prospective PORTO Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;208(4):290 e1–6.Google Scholar
Hecher, K, Bilardo, CM, Stigter, RH, Ville, Y, Hackeloer, BJ, Kok, HJ, et al. Monitoring of fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction: A longitudinal study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;18(6):564–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oros, D, Figueras, F, Cruz-Martinez, R, Meler, E, Munmany, M, Gratacos, E. Longitudinal changes in uterine, umbilical and fetal cerebral Doppler indices in late-onset small-for-gestational age fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;37(2):191–5.Google Scholar
Ferrazzi, E, Bozzo, M, Rigano, S, Bellotti, M, Morabito, A, Pardi, G, et al. Temporal sequence of abnormal Doppler changes in the peripheral and central circulatory systems of the severely growth-restricted fetus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002;19(2):140–6.Google Scholar
Baschat, AA, Cosmi, E, Bilardo, CM, Wolf, H, Berg, C, Rigano, S, et al. Predictors of neonatal outcome in early-onset placental dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109(2 Pt 1):253–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baschat, AA, Gembruch, U, Harman, CR. The sequence of changes in Doppler and biophysical parameters as severe fetal growth restriction worsens. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;18(6):571–7.Google Scholar
Del Rio, M, Martinez, JM, Figueras, F, Bennasar, M, Olivella, A, Palacio, M, et al. Doppler assessment of the aortic isthmus and perinatal outcome in preterm fetuses with severe intrauterine growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;31(1):41–7.Google Scholar
Cruz-Martinez, R, Figueras, F, Hernandez-Andrade, E, Oros, D, Gratacos, E. Fetal brain Doppler to predict cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal status in term small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117(3):618–26.Google Scholar
Flood, K, Unterscheider, J, Daly, S, Geary, MP, Kennelly, MM, McAuliffe, FM, et al. The role of brain sparing in the prediction of adverse outcomes in intrauterine growth restriction: Results of the multicenter PORTO Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014;211(3):288 e1–5.Google Scholar
Morales-Rosello, J, Khalil, A, Morlando, M, Papageorghiou, A, Bhide, A, Thilaganathan, B. Changes in fetal Doppler indices as a marker of failure to reach growth potential at term. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014;43(3):303–10.Google Scholar
Bilardo, CM, Wolf, H, Stigter, RH, Ville, Y, Baez, E, Visser, GH, et al. Relationship between monitoring parameters and perinatal outcome in severe, early intrauterine growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004;23(2):119–25.Google Scholar
Chappell, LC, Duckworth, S, Seed, PT, Griffin, M, Myers, J, Mackillop, L, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of placental growth factor in women with suspected preeclampsia: A prospective multicenter study. Circulation 2013;128(19):2121–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benton, SJ, Hu, Y, Xie, F, Kupfer, K, Lee, SW, Magee, LA, et al. Can placental growth factor in maternal circulation identify fetuses with placental intrauterine growth restriction? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206(2):163 e1–7.Google Scholar
Calabrese, S, Cardellicchio, M, Mazzocco, M, Taricco, E, Martinelli, A, Cetin, I. Placental growth factor (PLGF) maternal circulating levels in normal pregnancies and in pregnancies at risk of developing placental insufficiency complications. Reprod Sci 2012;19(3):211A–2A.Google Scholar
Chaiworapongsa, T, Romero, R, Korzeniewski, SJ, Kusanovic, JP, Soto, E, Hernandez-Andrade, E, et al. Prediction of stillbirth and late-onset preeclampsia. Reprod Sci 2012;19(3):90A–1A.Google Scholar
Griffin, M, Seed, P, Webster, L, Tarft, H, Chappell, L, Shennan, A. Placental growth factor (PLGF) and ultrasound parameters for predicting the small for gestational age infant (SGA) in suspected small for gestational age: Pelican FGR study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2014;27:121–2.Google Scholar
Arduini, D, Rizzo, G, Caforio, L, Boccolini, MR, Romanini, C, Mancuso, S. Behavioural state transitions in healthy and growth retarded fetuses. Early Hum Dev 1989;19(3):155–65.Google Scholar
Groom, KM, North, RA, Poppe, KK, Sadler, L, McCowan, LM. The association between customised small for gestational age infants and pre-eclampsia or gestational hypertension varies with gestation at delivery. BJOG 2007;114(4):478–84.Google Scholar
Ganzevoort, W, Rep, A, Bonsel, GJ, Fetter, WP, Van Sonderen, L, De Vries, JI, et al. A randomised controlled trial comparing two temporising management strategies, one with and one without plasma volume expansion, for severe and early onset pre-eclampsia. BJOG 2005;112(10):1358–68.Google Scholar
Dektas, B, Sibai, B, Habli, M. Pregnancies complicated with fetal growth restriction (FGR) are associated with a high rate of subsequent development of preeclampsia? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;208(1):S179–S80.Google Scholar
Gordijn, SJ, Beune, IM, Thilaganathan, B, Papageorghiou, A, Baschat, AA, Baker, PN, et al. Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016;48(3):333–9.Google Scholar
Vasak, B, Koenen, SV, Koster, MP, Hukkelhoven, CW, Franx, A, Hanson, MA, et al. Human fetal growth is constrained below optimal for perinatal survival. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014.Google Scholar
Villar, J, Papageorghiou, AT, Pang, R, Ohuma, EO, Ismail, LC, Barros, FC, et al. The likeness of fetal growth and newborn size across non-isolated populations in the INTERGROWTH-21 Project: The Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study and Newborn Cross-Sectional Study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2014.Google Scholar
Papageorghiou, AT, Ohuma, EO, Altman, DG, Todros, T, Cheikh, Ismail, L, Lambert, A, et al. International standards for fetal growth based on serial ultrasound measurements: the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project. Lancet 2014;384(9946):869–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×