,Agence France-Presse. 1991. “Ruling party expels two more dissidents.” December 7 (accessed through Factiva, June 4, 2007).

,Agence France Presse. 1997a. “SKorean workers reject lay-offs, accuse president-elect of backpedalling.” December 27 (accessed through Factiva, June 4, 2007).

,Agence France Presse. 1997b. “South Korean president-elect eases stance over layoffs.” December 22 (accessed through Factiva, June 4, 2007).

Alcántara Sáez, Manuel, and Freidenberg, Flavia, eds. 2001a. Partidos Políticos de América Latina: Cono Sur. Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad Salamanca.

,Agence France Presse. 2001b. Partidos Políticos de América Latina: Países Andinos. Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad Salamanca.Google Scholar

,Agence France Presse. 2001c. Partidos Políticos de América Latina: Centroamérica, México y República Dominicana. Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad Salamanca.Google Scholar

Alchian, Armen, and Demsetz, Harold. 1972. “Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization.” American Economic Review 62(5): 777–95.Google Scholar

Aldrich, John. 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Party Politics in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alemán, Eduardo, and Schwartz, Thomas. 2006. “Presidential Vetoes in Latin American Constitutions.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 18(1): 98–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alford, Peter. 1997. “Kim Dae-jung takes over Korea crisis.” The Australian (Queensland), December 26, p. 6.Google Scholar

Altman, David. 2001. “The Politics of Coalition Formation and Survival in Multiparty Presidential Regimes.” PhD dissertation, Department of Government, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN.

Alves, Carlos Eduardo. 1997. “Petista faz exigências e partido cobra dos aliados.” Folha de São Paulo, November 18, p. 6.Google Scholar

Alves, Carlos Eduardo. 1998a. “Frente define cúpula da campanha de Lula.” Folha de São Paulo, May 26, p. 11.Google Scholar

Alves, Carlos Eduardo. 1998b. “Esquerda dá commando de campanha a Lula.” Folha de São Paulo, May 27, p. 8.Google Scholar

Alves, Carlos Eduardo. 1998c. “Ex-radicais tocarão campanha de Lula.” Folha de São Paulo, June 3, p. 5.Google Scholar

Amaral, Ricardo, and Nery, Natuza. 2007. “PT tem de ceder espaços ou vai se isolar, diz Tarso.” O Estado de São Paulo, January 8. www.estadao.com.br.Google Scholar

,American Political Science Association. 1950. “Toward a More Responsible Two-party System: A Report of the Committee on Political Parties.” American Political Science Review 44(3): 1–14 (supplement, part 2).Google Scholar

Amorim Neto, Octavio. 2002. “Presidential Cabinets, Electoral Cycles, and Coalition Discipline in Brazil.” In Legislative Politics in Latin America, ed. Morgenstern, Scott and Nacif, Benito. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 48–78.Google Scholar

Amorim Neto, Octavio. 2006a. Presidencialismo e Governabilidade nas Américas. Rio de Janeiro: Editora FGV.Google Scholar

Amorim Neto, Octavio. 2006b. “The Presidential Calculus: Executive Policy-Making and Cabinet Formation in the Americas.” Comparative Political Studies 39(4): 415–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amorim Neto, Octavio, and Lobo, Marina Costa. 2009. “Portugal's Semi-Presidentialism (Re)considered: An Assessment of the President's Role in the Policy Process, 1976–2006.” European Journal of Political Research 48(2): 234–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amorim Neto, Octavio, and Strøm, Kaare. 2006. “Breaking the Parliamentary Chain of Delegation: Presidents and Non-Partisan Cabinet Members in European Democracies.” British Journal of Political Science 36(4): 619–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andeweg, R. B. 1997. “Institutional Reform in Dutch Politics; Elected Prime Minister, Personalized PR, and Popular Veto in Comparative Perspective.” Acta Politica 32: 227–57.Google Scholar

Árabe, Carlos Henrique Goulart. 2001. “A evolução programática do Partido dos Trabalhadores.” [The Programmatic Evolution of the Workers' Party] Conjuntura Política #29. On file with the authors.

Ard, Michael. 2003. An Eternal Struggle: How the National Action Party Transformed Mexican Politics. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar

Azevedo, Clóvis Bueno 1995. A Estrela Partida ao Meio: Ambigüidades do Pensamento Petista [The Star Split Down the Middle: Ambiguities of PT Thought]. São Paulo: Editora Entrelinhas.Google Scholar

Bacque, Raphaelle. 2000. “L'Elysée estime que le calendrier actuel sert Jacques Chirac.” Le Monde electronic edition, November 30.Google Scholar

Baker, M. 1997. “Kim's victory a landmark for Korea.” Courier Mail (Queensland, Australia), December 20, p. 17.Google Scholar

Bartels, Larry. 2008. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Baumgartner, Jody C., and Kada, Naoko, eds. 2003. Checking Executive Power: Presidential Impeachment in Comparative Perspective. Westport, CT: Praeger.

,BBC Monitoring Europe. 2004a. “Premier-delegate announces Romanian Humanist Party joins government.” Rompres news agency, Bucharest. December 23.Google Scholar

,BBC Monitoring Europe. 2004b. “Romania presidential candidate seeks cooperation with victorious rival.” Radio Romania Actualitati, Bucharest. December 13.Google Scholar

,BBC Monitoring Europe. 2004c. “Terms of new Romanian political alliance outlined.” Rompres news agency, Bucharest. September 9.

,BBC Monitoring Europe. 2005. “Romania's ruling coalition signs governance agreement.” Pro TV, Bucharest. February 16.Google Scholar

,BBC Monitoring Europe. 2007. “Romanian premier declares ruling alliance ‘dead.’” March 27.

,BBC news online. 2005. “Deal to end crisis in Nicaragua.” October 11, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4329688.stm (accessed June 4, 2007).

Beer, Samuel. 1953. “Les parties politiques [Political Parties].” Western Political Quarterly 6(3): 512–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell, David S., and Criddle, Byron. 2002. “Presidentialism Restored: The French Elections of April-May and June 2002.” Parliamentary Affairs 55(4): 643–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benoit, Kenneth, and Laver, Michael. 2006. Party Policy in Modern Democracies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Berry, Christopher R., Burden, Barry C., and Howell, William G.. 2009. “The President and the Distribution of Federal Spending.” Unpublished.

Beuve Mery, Alain. 2000a. “Le PCF refuse un changement ‘dangereux pour la démocratie.’” Le Monde electronic edition, November 30.Google Scholar

Beuve Mery, Alain. 2000b. “Les Verts ‘piégés’ par leur base sur la question du mode de scrutin.” Le Monde electronic edition, November 2.Google Scholar

Bick, E. 1998. “Sectarian Party Politics in Israel: The Case of Yisrael Ba'Aliya, the Russian Immigrant Party.” In Israel at the Polls, ed. Elazar, Daniel and Sandler, Shmuel. London: Frank Cass, 121–45.Google Scholar

Blondel, Jean. 1984. “Dual Leadership in the Contemporary World: A Step Towards Regime Stability?” In Comparative Government and Politics: Essays in Honor of S. E. Finer, ed. Kavanagh, Dennis and Peele, Gillian. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 73–91.Google Scholar

Blondel, Jean, and Müller-Rommel, Ferdinand. 2001. Cabinets in Eastern Europe. Baskingstoke, UK: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bobbio, Norberto. 1989. Democracy and Dictatorship. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Boix, Carles. 2007. “The Emergence of Parties and Party Systems.” In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, ed. Boix, Carles and Stokes, Susan. New York: Oxford University Press, 499–521.Google Scholar

Bollard, Alan. 1994. “New Zealand.” In The Political Economy of Policy Reform, ed. Williamson, J.. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics, 73–110.Google Scholar

Briones Loásiga, William. 2002. “Pugna Alemán-Bolaños.” La Prensa on-line. June 17. http://www.ni.laprensa.com.ni/cronologico/2002/junio/17/nacionales/nacionales-20020617–19.html (accessed June 4, 2007).Google Scholar

Bruhn, Kathleen. 2004. “Globalization and the Renovation of the Latin American Left: Strategies of Ideological Adaptation.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.

Bruhn, Kathleen. 2006. “Party Ideology and Issue Stability in Mexico.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia.

Bryce, James. 1888. The American Commonwealth. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Burden, Barry, and Kimball, David. 2002. Why Americans Split Their Tickets. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burger, Angela S. 1992. “Changing Civil-Military Relations in Sri Lanka.” Asian Survey 32(8): 744–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burnham, Walter Dean. 1979. “Party Systems and the Political Process.” In The American Party Systems: Stages of Political Development, ed. Chambers, W. N. and Burnham, W. D.. New York: Oxford University Press, 277–308.Google Scholar

Burton, John. 1997. “S Korea candidates skirt round realities.” Financial Times, November 10, p. 4.Google Scholar

Busch, Andrew. 1997. Outsiders and Openness in the Presidential Nominating System. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar

Cain, Bruce, Ferejohn, John, and Fiorina, Morris. 1987. The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, James E. 1997. The Presidential Pulse of Congressional Elections. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar

Carey, John. 1996. Term Limits and Legislative Representation. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carey, John. 2009. Legislative Voting and Accountability. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Carey, John M., and Shugart, Matthew S.. 1995. “Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank-Ordering of Electoral Formulas.” Electoral Studies 14(4): 417–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carroll, Royce. 2007. “The Electoral Origins of Governing Coalitions.” PhD dissertation, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar

Carroll, Royce, and Cox, Gary. 2007. “The Logic of Gamson's Law: Pre-Electoral Coalitions and Portfolio Allocations.” American Journal of Political Science 52(2): 300–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carroll, Royce, and Shugart, Matthew Soberg. 2007. “Neo-Madisonian Theories of Latin American Institutions.” In Regimes and Democracy in Latin America, Volume I: Theories and Agendas, ed. G. L. Munck. New York: Oxford University Press, 51–104.Google Scholar

Ceaser, James. 1979. Presidential Selection: Theory and Development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Cháirez, Angelle Hernández. 2006. “Reconoce Calderón que hay distancia con el PAN.” El Financiero electronic edition, March 2.Google Scholar

Chambraud, Cecile, and Gurrey, Beatrice. 2002. “Lionel Jospin déclenche la polémique sur le calendrier electoral de 2002.” Le Monde electronic edition, November 28.Google Scholar

Chandler, Clay. 1997a. “Fear grows that Seoul will renege on reform promise; despite IMF deal, analysts and investors sense a reluctance to dismantle ‘Korea Inc.’” Washington Post, December 10, p. C13.Google Scholar

Chandler, Clay. 1997b. “S. Korea's Kim proves mettle in financial crisis; president-elect gains support for savvy economic strategy.” Washington Post, December 29, p. A1.Google Scholar

Cheibub, José Antonio. 2002. “Minority Governments, Deadlock Situations, and the Survival of Presidential Democracies.” Comparative Political Studies 35(3): 284–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cheibub, José Antonio. 2007. Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cheibub, José Antonio, and Limongi, Fernando. 2002. “Modes of Government Formation and the Survival of Democratic Regimes: Presidentialism and Parliamentarism Reconsidered.” Annual Review of Political Science 5: 151–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cheibub, José Antonio, Przeworski, Adam, and Saiegh, Sebastian. 2004. “Government Coalitions and Legislative Success under Presidentialism and Parliamentarism.” British Journal of Political Science 34(4): 565–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chhibber, Pradeep, and Kollman, Ken. 2004. The Formation of National Party Systems: Federalism and Party Competition in Canada, Great Britain, India, and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Clark, Terry D., and Jurgelevičiūtė, Diana. 2008. “ ‘Keeping Tabs on Coalition Partners’: A Theoretically Salient Case Study of Lithuanian Coalitional Governments.” Europe-Asia Studies 60(4): 631–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, Terry D., and Wittrock, Jill. 2005. “Presidentialism and the Effect of Electoral Law in Postcommunist Systems.” Comparative Political Studies 38(2): 171–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clift, Ben. 2005. “Dyarchic Presidentialization in a Presidentialized Polity: The French Fifth Republic.” In The Presidentionalization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies, ed. Poguntke, Thomas and Webb, Paul. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 221–45.Google Scholar

,CNN. 2007. “Left Tempers Sarkozy's Poll Win.” June 18. http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD-/europe/06/17/france.votes.conservatives.reut/index.html (accessed June 18, 2007).

Cohen, Marty, Karol, David, Noel, Hans, and Zaller, John. 2008. The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations Before and After Reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cole, A. 1990a. “The Evolution of the Party System, 1974–1990.” In French Political Parties in Transition, ed. Cole, Alistair. Aldershot: Dartmouth, 3–24.Google Scholar

Cole, A. 1990b. “The Return of the Orleanist Right: The Union for French Democracy.” In French Political Parties in Transition, ed. Cole, Alistair. Aldershot: Dartmouth, 106–39.Google Scholar

Cole, A. 1993. “The Presidential Party and the Fifth Republic.” West European Politics 16(2): 49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cole, A., and Campbell, P.. 1989. French Electoral Systems and Elections since 1789. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar

Colton, Timothy. 1995. “Superpresidentialism and Russia's Backward State.” Post-Soviet Affairs 11(2): 144–48.Google Scholar

Condon, Christopher, and Wagstyl, Stefan. 2007. “Romanian parliament suspends president.” Financial Times online edition. http://cachef.ft.com/cms/s/0/d3be5f1a-ee6e-11db-b5e9–000b5df10621.html?nclick_check=1 (accessed August 21, 2008).

Converse, Philip, and Pierce, Roy. 1986. Political Representation in France. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooper, Philip J. 2005. “George W. Bush, Edgar Allan Poe, and the Use and Abuse of Presidential Signing Statements.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 35(3): 515–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coppedge, Michael. 1994. Strong Parties and Lame Ducks: Presidential Partyarchy and Factionalism in Venezuela. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Coppedge, Michael. 2002. Presidential Runoffs Do Not Fragment Legislative Party Systems. Unpublished manuscript: University of Notre Dame.

Corrales, Javier. 2002. Presidents without Parties: The Politics of Economic Reform in Argentina and Venezuela in the 1990s. State College, PA: Penn State Press.Google Scholar

,Agence France Presse. 2005. “Expresidents and Newcomers Running for President … and Winning Recent Elections in Latin America.” Presented at the Annual Conference of the Society for Latin American Studies, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Courtney, John C. 1995. Do Conventions Matter? Choosing National Party Leaders in Canada. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.

Courtois, Gerard, and Chambraud, Cecille. 2000. “L'avenir du quinquennat dépendra du calendrier électoral.” Le Monde electronic edition, September 24.Google Scholar

Cox, Gary W. 1987. The Efficient Secret. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, Gary W. 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

,Agence France Presse. 2001. “The Institutional Determinants of Policy Outcomes.” In Presidents, Parliaments, and Policy, ed. Haggard, Stephan and McCubbins, Matthew. New York: Cambridge University Press, 27–89.Google Scholar

,Agence France Presse. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cox, Karen E., and Schioppa, Leonard. 2002. “Interaction Effects in Mixed-Member Systems.” Comparative Political Studies 35(9): 1027–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crisp, Brian F. 2000. Democratic Institutional Design: The Powers and Incentives of Venezuelan Politicians and Interest Groups. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Crow, David. 2005. “Crossing Party Lines: Volatility and Ticket Splitting in Mexico (1994–2000).” Bulletin of Latin American Research 24(1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cutler, Lloyd. 1980. “To Form a Government.” Foreign Affairs 59(1): 126–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dahl, Robert. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

,Agence France Presse. 1990. “Myth of the Presidential Mandate.” Political Science Quarterly 105(3): 355–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dalton, Russell, ed. 2008. Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies, 5th ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar

Dalton, Russell, McCallister, Ian, and Wattenberg, Martin. 2000. “The Consequences of Partisan Dealignment.” In Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies, ed. Dalton, R. and Wattenberg, M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 37–63.Google Scholar

Davis, James W. 1992. The President as Party Leader. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar

Davis, James W. 1998. Leadership Selection in Six Western Democracies. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar

Diamond, Larry, and Gunther, Richard, eds. 2001. Political Parties and Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Diehl, Jackson. 1982. “Populist Lightens Staid Colombian Politics.” Washington Post, November 20, p. A14.Google Scholar

Diskin, A., and Hazan, R. Y.. 2002. “The 2001 Prime-ministerial Election in Israel.” Electoral Studies 21(4) (December): 659–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dix, Robert H. 1989. “Cleavage Structures and Party Systems in Latin America.” Comparative Politics 22(1): 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Döring, Herbert. 2001. “Parliamentary Agenda Control and Legislative Outcomes in Western Europe.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 26: 145–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Douglas, Roger. 1980. There's Got to Be a Better Way. Wellington: Fourth Estate Books.Google Scholar

Newswires, Dow Jones International. 1999. “Romania's dismissed prime min submits resignation – radio.” December 17.

Duhamel, Olivier. 1991. Le Pouvoir Politique en France [Political Power in France]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Duhamel, Olivier, and Grunberg, Gérard. 2001. “Système de partis et Ves Républiques [Party Systems and Fifth Republics].” Commentaire 95 (Automne): 533–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duverger, Maurice. 1954. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Duverger, Maurice. 1980. “A New Political-System Model: Semi-Presidential Government.” European Journal of Political Research 8(2): 165–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Review, East European Constitutional. 1999. “Constitution Watch.” Volume 8 Number 3, summer 1999. http://www.law.nyu.edu/eecr/vol8num3/constitutionwatch/lithuania.html (accessed August 8, 2008).

Economist, . 1991. “President Challenged with Impeachment.” September 7.

Edwards, George C. III 1989. At the Margins: Presidential Leadership of Congress. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Service, EFE News. 2005. “Sandinistas halt impeachment steps against Nicara- guan president.” September 12 (accessed through Factiva, June 4, 2007).

Ehrlich, Sean. 2000. “Presidentialism and the Effective Number of Parties: Executive Power's Encouragement of Cross-District Linkages.” Presented at the meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.

Elgie, Robert, ed. 1999. Semi-Presidentialism in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef

Epstein, Leon. 1967. Political Parties in Western Democracies. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

Epstein, Leon. 1986. Political Parties in the American Mold. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

Escudero, Laura. 2001. “Argentina.” In Partidos Politicos en América Latina: Cono Sur [Political Parties in Latin America: Southern Cone], ed. Alcántara Saez, M. and Freidenberg, F.. Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca, 33–116.Google Scholar

Ferejohn, John, and Calvert, Randall. 1984. “Presidential Coattails in Historical Perspective.” American Journal of Political Science 28(1): 127–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Figueiredo, Marcus. 1994. “Competição Eleitoral: Eleições Casadas, Resultados Solteiros [Electoral Competition: Married Elections, Divorced Results].” Monitor Público 2: 21–27.Google Scholar

Filippov, Mikhail, Ordeshook, Peter, and Shvetsova, Olga. 1999. “Party Fragmentation and Presidential Elections in Post-Communist Democracies.” Constitutional Political Economy 10(1): 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fiorina, Morris P. 1988. “Party Government in the United States: Diagnosis and Prognosis.” In Party Governments: European and American Experiences, ed. Katz, R. S.. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 270–300.Google Scholar

Fish, M. Steven. 1998. “Mongolia: Democracy without Prerequisites.” Journal of Democracy 9(3): 127–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fish, M. Steven. 2000. “The Executive Deception: Superpresidentialism and the Degradation of Russian Politics.” In Building the Russian State: Institutional Crisis and the Quest for Democratic Governance, ed. Sperling, Valerie. Boulder, CO: Westview, 177–92.Google Scholar

Fish, M. Steven. 2005. Democracy Derailed in Russia. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fitzmaurice, John. 1993. “The Estonian Elections of 1992.” Electoral Studies 12, 2 (June): 168–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frears, J. 1991. Parties and Voters in France. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar

Freidenberg, Flavia, and López, Francisco Sánchez. 2001. “Partidos políticos y métodos de selección de candidatos en América Latina: Una discusión sobre reglas y prácticas.” Presented at the 23rd meeting of the Latin American Studies Association, Washington, DC.

Gaffney, J. 1990. “The Emergence of a Presidential Party: The Socialist Party.” In French Political Parties in Transition, ed. Cole, A.. Aldershot: Dartmouth, 61–90.Google Scholar

Geddes, Barbara. 1999. “What Do We Know about Democratization after Twenty Years?” Annual Reviews of Political Science 2: 115–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geddes, Barbara. 2004. “The Development of Party Systems in Latin America.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Western Political Science Association, Portland, Oregon.

Gerring, John, and Strom Thacker. 2004. “Political Institutions and Corruption: The Role of Unitarism and Parliamentarism.” British Journal of Political Science 34(2): 295–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giniger, Henry. 1962. “Pompidou named French premier.” New York Times, April 15, p. 3.

Ginsburg, Tom. 1998. “Mongolia in 1997: Deepening Democracy.” Asian Survey 38, 1 (January): 64–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,Global Insight Daily Archives. 2005. “Nicaraguan Congress Ends Impeachment Effort.” October 27 (accessed through Factiva, June 4, 2007).

Goldberg, G. 1998. “The Electoral Fall of the Israeli Left.” In Israel at the Polls 1996, ed. Elazar, Daniel and Sandler, Shmuel. London: Frank Cass, 53–72.Google Scholar

Golder, Matt. 2006. “Presidential Coattails and Legislative Fragmentation.” American Journal of Political Science 50(1): 34–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Golder, Sona. 2006. The Logic of Pre-Electoral Coalition Formation. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar

Gunther, Richard, Montero, José Ramón, and Linz, Juan, eds. 2002. Political Parties: Old Concepts and New Challenges. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef

Gurrey, Beatrice, and Montvalon, Jean Baptiste. 2000. “Le gouvernment ne paraît pas disposé à modifier le calendrier électoral de 2002.” Le Monde electronic edition, October 6.

Hagopian, Frances. 2007. “Parties and Voters in Emerging Democracies.” In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, ed. Boix, Carles and Stokes, Susan. New York: Oxford University Press, 582–603.Google Scholar

Hale, Henry. 2005. “Party Development in a Federal System: The Impact of Putin's Reforms.” In The Dynamics of Russian Politics: Putin's Reform of Federal-Regional Relations 2, ed. Reddaway, Peter and Orttung, Robert. Boulder, CO: Rowman and Littlefield, 179–211.Google Scholar

Hamilton, Alexander, Madison, James, Jay, John, and Fairfield, Roy P.. [1787] 1937. The Federalist Papers: A Collection of Essays Written in Support of the Constitution of the United States: From the Original Text of Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, John Jay. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Hazan, Reuven. 1997. “Executive-Legislative Relations in an Era of Reform: Reshaping Government in Israel.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 22(3): 329–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hazan, Reuven. 1999. “The Electoral Consequences of Political Reform.” In The Elections in Israel 1996, ed. Arian, Asher and Shamir, Michal. Albany: State University of New York Press, 163–85.Google Scholar

Hazan, Reuven. 2001. “The Israeli Mixed Electoral System: Unexpected Cumulative and Reciprocal Consequences.” In Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds? ed. Shugart, Matthew S. and Wattenberg, Martin P.. New York: Oxford University Press, 351–79.Google Scholar

Hazan, Reuven. 2005. “The Failure of Presidential Parliamentarism: Constitutional versus Structural Presidentialization in Israel's Parliamentary Democracy.” In The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies, ed. Webb, Paul and Poguntke, Thomas. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 287–310.Google Scholar

Hazan, Reuven, Kenig, Ofer, and Rahat, Gideon. 2005. “The Political Consequences of the Introduction and the Repeal of the Direct Elections for the Prime Minister.” In The Elections in Israel 2003, ed. Arian, Asher and Shamir, Michal. New York: Transaction Publishers, 33–61.Google Scholar

Hazan, Reuven, and Rahat, Gideon. 2000. “Representation, Electoral Reform, and Democracy: Theoretical and Empirical Lessons from the 1996 Elections in Israel.” Comparative Political Studies 33(10): 1310–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heffernan, R. 2005. “Why the Prime Minister Cannot Be a President: Comparing Institutional Imperatives in Britain and America.” Parliamentary Affairs 58(1): 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hellwig, Timothy, and Samuels, David. 2008. “Electoral Accountability and the Variety of Democratic Regimes.” British Journal of Political Science 38(1): 65–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Helmke, Gretchen. 2006. “Dividing to Democratize? Uncertainty and Ticket-Splitting in the Mexico 2000 Elections.” Presented at the conference titled “Democracy, Divided Government and Split-Ticket Voting,” Harvard University.

Helms, E. Allen. 1949. “The President and Party Politics.” Journal of Politics 11(1): 42–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Helms, E. Allen. “Helsinki cabinet quits; Majority coalition due.” New York Times. 1977, May 12, p. 16.

Herron, Erik, and Nishikawa, Misa. 2001. “Contamination Effects and the Number of Parties in Mixed-Superposition Electoral Systems.” Electoral Studies 20(1): 63–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hershey, Marjorie Randon. 2008. Party Politics in America, 13th ed. New York: Longman.Google Scholar

Hicken, Alan, and Stoll, Heather. 2007. “Presidents, Powers and Parties: The Sources of Legislative Electoral Coordination in Presidential Regimes.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.

Hickman, John. 1999. “Explaining the Two-Party System in Sri Lanka's National Assembly.” Contemporary South Asia 8(1): 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hochstetler, Kathryn. 2006a. “Organized Civil Society in Lula's Brazil.” Paper prepared for presentation at the Latin American Studies Association 2006 Conference, San Juan, Puerto Rico.

Hochstetler, Kathryn. 2006b. “Rethinking Presidentialism: Challenges and Presidential Falls in South America.” Comparative Politics 38(4): 401–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huber, John, Kernell, Georgia, and Leoni, Eduardo. 2005. “Institutional Context, Cognitive Resources and Party Attachments across Democracies.” Political Analysis 13(4): 365–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huber, John, and Martínez-Gallardo, Cecilia. 2008. “Replacing Cabinet Ministers: Patterns of Ministerial Stability in Parliamentary Democracies.” American Political Science Review 102(1): 169–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunter, Wendy. 2007. “The Normalization of an Anomaly: The Workers' Party in Brazil.” World Politics 59(3): 440–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunter, Wendy, and Power, Timothy. 2005. “Lula's Brazil at Midterm.” Journal of Democracy 16(3): 127–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunter, Wendy, and Power, Timothy J.. 2007. “Rewarding Lula: Executive Power, Social Policy, and the Brazilian Elections of 2006.” Latin American Politics and Society 49(1): 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huntington, Samuel. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late 20th Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar

Inglehart, Ronald. 1987. “Value Change in Industrial Societies.” American Political Science Review 81(4): 1289–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ishiyama, J. T., and Kennedy, R.. 2001 “Superpresidentialism and Political Party Development in Russia, Ukraine, Armenia and Kyrgyzstan.” Europe-Asia Studies 53(8): 1177–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ito, Mazami. 2006. “Koizumi leaves LDP factions in tatters.” Japan Times Online, June 26. http://search.japantimes.co.jp/print/nn20060626f1.html (accessed December 30, 2008).Google Scholar

Janda, Kenneth. 1992. “The American Constitutional Framework and the Structure of American Political Parties.” In The Constitution and American Political Development: An Institutional Perspective, ed. Nardulli, P. F.. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 179–206.Google Scholar

Janda, Kenneth. 1993. “Comparative Political Parties: Research and Theory.” In Political Science: The State of the Discipline II, ed. Finifter, A. W.. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association, 163–92.Google Scholar

Janda, Kenneth, and Colman, Tyler. 1998. “Effects of Party Organization on Performance during the ‘Golden Age’ of Parties.” Political Studies 46(3): 611–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jérôme, Bruno, Jérôme-Speziari, Véronique, and Lewis-Beck, Michael S.. 2003. “Reordering the French Election Calendar: Forecasting the Consequences for 2002.” European Journal of Political Research 42(3): 425–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, Charles O. 1999. Separate but Equal Branches: Congress and the Presidency, 2nd ed. New York: Chatham House.Google Scholar

Jones, Mark P. 1995. Electoral Laws and the Survival of Presidential Democracies. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Joynes, Kate. 2005. “Judge Ends Trial Proceedings against Accused Nicaraguan Ministers.” Global Insight Daily Archives. October 26 (accessed through Factiva, June 4, 2007).

Kada, Naoko. 2003. “Impeachment as Punishment for Corruption? The Cases of Brazil and Venezuela.” In Checking Executive Power: Presidential Impeachment in Comparative Perspective, ed. Baumgartner, Jody and Kada, Naoko. Westport, CT: Praeger, 113–36.Google Scholar

Kasuya, Yuko. 2004. “Presidentialism and Legislative Party System Formation: The Philippines as a Crucial Case.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.

Katz, Richard S. 1987. “Party Government and Its Alternatives.” In Party Governments: European and American Experiences, ed. Katz, R. S.. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1–27.Google Scholar

Katz, Richard S., and Crotty, William, eds. 2006. Handbook of Party Politics. London: Sage.

Katz, Richard S., and Kolodny, Robin. 1994. “Party Organization as an Empty Vessel: Parties in American Politics.” In How Parties Organize: Change and Adaptation in Party Organizations in Western Democracies, ed. Katz, R. S. and Mair, P.. London: Sage, 23–50.Google Scholar

Katz, Richard S., and Mair, Peter. 1995. “Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party.” Party Politics 1(1): 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keck, Margaret. 1992. The Workers' Party and Democratization in Brazil. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Kelley, Stanley. 1983. Interpreting Elections. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kenig, Ofer. 2006. “The Selection of Party Leaders in Parliamentary Democracies: A Classification.” Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Unpublished manuscript.

Kenig, Ofer, Rahat, Gideon, and Hazan, Reuven. 2005. “The Political Consequences of the Introduction and the Repeal of the Direct Elections for the Prime Minister.” In The Elections in Israel – 2003. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 33–62.Google Scholar

Kernell, Samuel. 2003. “The True Principles of Republican Government: Assessing James Madison's Political Science.” In James Madison: The Theory and Politics of Republican Government, ed. Kernell, S.. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 92–125.Google Scholar

Key, V. O. 1952. Politics, Parties, and Pressure Groups. New York: Crowell.Google Scholar

Kiewiet, D. Roderick, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1991. The Logic of Delegation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kimball, David C., and Gross, Cassie A.. 2007. “The Growing Polarization of American Voters.” In The State of the Parties, ed. Green, John C.. Boulder, CO: Rowman & Littlefield, 265–78.Google Scholar

Kirchheimer, Otto. 1966. “The Transformation of Western European Party Systems.” In Political Parties and Political Development, ed. LaPalombara, J. and Weiner, M.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 177–200.Google Scholar

Kitschelt, Herbert. 1994. The Transformation of European Social Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kitschelt, Herbert. 2007. “Party Systems.” In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, ed. Boix, Carles and Stokes, Susan. New York: Oxford University Press, 522–54.Google Scholar

Kitschelt, Herbert, Mansfeldova, Zdenka, Toka, Gabor, and Markowski, Radoslaw. 1999. Post-Communist Party Systems: Competition, Representation, and Inner-Party Cooperation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klingeman, Hans-Dieter, Hofferbert, Richard I., and Budge, Ian. 1994. Parties, Policies, and Democracy Theoretical Lenses on Public Policy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Klinkner, Philip. 1994. The Losing Parties: Out-Party National Committees, 1956–1993. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Knapp, A. 1990. “Un parti comme les autres: Jacques Chirac and the Rally for the Republic.” In French Political Parties in Transition, ed. Cole, A.. Aldershot: Dartmouth, 140–84.Google Scholar

Kolodny, Robin. 1998. Pursuing Majorities: Congressional Campaign Committees in American Politics. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar

Krauss, Ellis S., and Nyblade, Benjamin. 2005. “‘Presidentialization’ in Japan? The Prime Minister, Media and Elections in Japan.” British Journal of Political Science 35: 357–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krupavicius, Algis. 2007. “Lithuania.” European Journal of Political Research 46: 1019–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

LaPalombara, Joseph, and Weiner, Myron. 1966. Political Parties and Political Development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,Latin American Weekly Report (LAWR). 2004. “Nicaragua: Assembly takes first step towards impeachment.” October 19 (accessed through Factiva, June 4, 2007).

,Latinnews Daily On-Line, 2005. “Nicaragua: Opposition unites against Bolaños.” January 10 (accessed through Factiva, June 4, 2007).

Laver, Michael. 1999. “Divided Parties, Divided Government.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 24(1): 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laver, Michael, and Shepsle, Kenneth. 1996. Making and Breaking Governments: Cabinets and Legislatures in Parliamentary Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, Youngjae. 2005. “Law, Politics and Impeachment: The Impeachment of Roh Moo-hyun from a Comparative Constitutional Perspective.” NYU School of Law, Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper #4. Available at http://lsr.nellco.org/nyu/plltwp/papers/4 (accessed June 1, 2007).

Leoni, Eduardo. 2002. “Ideologia, Democracia e Comportamento Parlamentar: A Câmara dos Deputados (1991–1998)” [Ideology, Democracy and Parliamentary Behavior: The Chamber of Deputies (1991–1998)]. DADOS – Revista de Ciências Sociais 45(3): 361–86.Google Scholar

Lijphart, Arend. 1984. Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lijphart, Arend. ed. 1992. Parliamentary versus Presidential Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lijphart, Arend. 1994. Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies, 1945–1990. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Linz, Juan J. 1990. “The Perils of Presidentialism.” Journal of Democracy 1: 51–69.Google Scholar

Linz, Juan J. 1994. “Presidential or Parliamentary Democracy: Does It Make a Difference?” In The Failure of Presidential Democracy, Volume 2: The Case of Latin America, ed. Linz, J. and Valenzuela, Arturo. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 3–90.Google Scholar

Lipset, Seymour Martin, and Rokkan, Stein. 1967. Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Loaeza, Soledad. 1999. El Partido Acción Nacional, la larga marcha 1934–1994: oposición leal y partido de protesta. [PAN, the long march 1934–1994: loyal opposition and protest party]. Sección de obras de política y derecho. México D.F.: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar

Long, Norton E. 1951. “Party Government and the United States.” Journal of Politics 13(2): 187–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lupia, Arthur. 2003. “Delegation and Its Perils.” In Delegation and Accountability in West European Parliamentary Democracies, ed. Bergman, Torbjörn, Müller, Wolfgang C., and Strøm, Kaare. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 33–54.Google Scholar

Machin, H. 1989. “Stages and Dynamics in the Evolution of the French Party System.” West European Politics 12(4): 59–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mackie, Thomas T., and Rose, Richard. 1991. The International Almanac of Electoral History. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maddens, Bart, and Fiers, Stefaan. 2004. “The Direct PM Election and the Institutional Presidentialisation of Parliamentary Systems.” Electoral Studies 23, 4 (December): 769–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mahler, G. S. 1997. “The forming of the Netanyahu government: coalition-formation in a quasi-parliamentary setting.” Israel Affairs 3, 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mainwaring, Scott. 1993. “Presidentialism, Multipartism, and Democracy: The Difficult Combination.” Comparative Political Studies 26(2): 198–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mainwaring, Scott. 1995. “Brazil: Weak Parties, Feckless Democracy.” In Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America, ed. Mainwaring, Scott and Scully, Timothy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 354–98.Google Scholar

Mainwaring, Scott P. 1999. Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Mainwaring, Scott, and Jones, Mark. 2003. “The Nationalization of Parties and Party Systems: An Empirical Measure and an Application to the Americas.” Party Politics 9(2): 139–66.Google Scholar

Mainwaring, Scott, and Scully, Timothy. 1995. “Introduction: Parties and Party Systems in Latin America.” In Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America, ed. Mainwaring, Scott and Scully, Timothy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1–37.Google Scholar

Mainwaring, Scott, and Shugart, Matthew S.. 1997. “Juan Linz, Presidentialism, and Democracy: A Critical Appraisal.” Comparative Politics 29(4): 449–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mainwaring, Scott, and Torcal, Mariano. 2006. “Party System Institutionalization and Party System Theory after the Third Wave of Democratization.” In Handbook of Party Politics, ed. Katz, R. and Crotty, William. London: Sage, 204–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manin, Bernard, Przeworski, Adam, and Stokes, Susan. 1999. “Elections and Representation.” In Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, ed. Przeworski, A., Stokes, S. C., and Manin, B.. New York: Cambridge University Press, 29–54.Google Scholar

Maravall, José María. 2008. “The Political Consequences of Internal Party Democracy.” In Controlling Governments: Voters, Institutions and Accountability, ed. Maravall, José María and Sánchez-Cuenca, Ignacio. New York: Cambridge University Press, 157–201.Google Scholar

Marshall, Monty, and Jaggers, Keith. 2008. “POLITY IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2007.” Dataset and User's Manual. Center for Global Policy, School of Public Policy, George Mason University.

Marsteintredet, Leiv, and Berntzen, Einar. 2008. “Latin American Presidentialism: Reducing the Perils of Presidentialism through Presidential Interruptions.” Comparative Politics 41(3): 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, L. W., and Vanberg, G.. 2004. “Policing the Bargain: Coalition Government and Parliamentary Scrutiny.” American Journal of Political Science 48(1): 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martz, John. 1966. Acción Democrática. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress, the Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

McCormick, Richard. 1966. The Second American Party System: Party Formation in the Jacksonian Era. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

,Agence France Presse. 1979. “Political Development and the Second Party System.” In The American Party Systems: Stages of Political Development, ed. Chambers, W. N. and Burnham, W. D.. New York: Oxford University Press, 152–81.Google Scholar

Medding, Peter. 2000. “From Government by Party to Government Despite Party.” In Parties, Elections and Cleavages: Israel in Comparative and Theoretical Perspective, ed. Hazan, Reuven and Maor, Moshe. London: Frank Cass, 172–208.Google Scholar

Meleshevich, Andrey. 2007. Party Systems in Post-Soviet Countries. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mendilow, Jonathan. 1999. “The Likud's Double Campaign: Between the Devil and the Deep Blue Sea.” In The Elections in Israel 1996, ed. Arian, A. and Shamir, M.. Albany, : State University of New York Press, 187–210.Google Scholar

Mi-young, Ahn. 1997. “Former dissident Kim vows to lead South Korea out of economic crisis.” Deutsche Presse Agentur, December 19.

Michels, Roberto. [1911] 1962. Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy, trans. Paul, E. A. C.. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Milkis, Sidney. 1993. The President and the Parties: The Transformation of the American Party System since the New Deal. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Miller, Warren. 1955. “Presidential Coattails: A Study in Myth and Methodology.” Public Opinion Quarterly 19: 353–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, Warren, and Stokes, Donald. 1966. “Constituency Influence in Congress.” In Elections and the Political Order, ed. Campbell, A., Converse, P., Miller, W., and Stokes, D.. New York: Wiley, 351–72.Google Scholar

Mizrahi, Yemile. 2003. From Martyrdom to Power: The Partido Acción Nacional in Mexico. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Mommsen, Wolfgang J. 1984. Max Weber and German Politics, 1890–1920, trans. Steinberg, Michael S.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Morgenstern, Scott, and Swindle, Steven. 2005. “Are Politics Local? An Analysis of Voting Patterns in 23 Democracies.” Comparative Political Studies 38(2): 143–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moser, Robert, and Scheiner, Ethan. 2004. “Mixed Electoral Systems and Electoral Systems Effects: Controlled Comparison and Cross-National Analysis.” Electoral Studies 23(4): 575–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Müller, Sean. 2006. “Presidential Power in Semi-Presidential Systems – The Case of Romania.” Lizentiatsarbeit, eingereicht bei der Philosophischen Fakultät der Universität Freiburg (CH).

Müller, Wolfgang C. 1999. “Austria.” In Semi-Presidentialism in Europe, ed. Elgie, Robert. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Muñoz, Náfer. 2002. “Politics – Nicaragua: Alemán already preparing return to power.” Inter-Press Service/Global Information Network. January 11 (accessed through Lexis-Nexis Academic, June 4, 2007).

Myerson, Roger. 1999. “Political Economics and the Weimar Disaster.” Discussion Paper No. 1216, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science, Northwestern University.

Nachmias, D., and Sened, I.. 1999. “The Bias of Pluralism: The Redistributive Effects of the New Electoral Law in Israel's 1996 Election.” In The Elections in Israel 1996, ed. Arian, Asher and Shamir, Michal. Albany: State University of New York Press, 269–94.Google Scholar

Nacif, Benito. 2002. “Understanding Party Discipline in the Mexican Chamber of Deputies: The Centralized Party Model.” In Legislative Politics in Latin America, ed. Morgenstern, Scott and Nacif, Benito. New York: Cambridge University Press, 254–86.Google Scholar

Nagel, Jack H. 1998. “Social Choice in a Pluralitarian Democracy: The Politics of Market Liberalization in New Zealand.” British Journal of Political Science 28: 223–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neustadt, Richard E. 1960. Presidential Power: The Politics of Leadership. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Nicholas, Peter. 2009. “Obama's party may not toe line.” Los Angeles Times, March 8, pp. A1, A6.Google Scholar

Nixon, Richard. 1974. “Address on the energy crisis followed by excerpts from a question and answer period with the press.” Recording Source: WKAR-FM, February 23. Vincent Voice Library, Michigan State University Libraries, http://vvl.lib.msu.edu/record.cfm?recordid=5272 (accessed February 26, 2009).

Northcutt, W. 1989. “The 1988 French Presidential Election: François Mitterand's Campaign Strategy.” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Western Society for French History 16: 291–301.Google Scholar

Nousiainen, Jaako. 2000. “The Consolidation of Parliamentary Governance.” In Coalition Governments in Western Europe, ed. Müller, Wolfgang C. and Strøm, Kaare. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 264–99.Google Scholar

Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Onishi, Norimitsu. 2007. “World Briefing Asia: South Korea: President Quits His Party.” New York Times, Feb. 23, p. 6.

Ordeshook, Peter. 1995. “Institutions and Incentives.” Journal of Democracy 6: 46–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ostrogorski, Moisei. [1902] 1964. Democracy and the Organization of Political Parties, Volume II: The United States, ed. Lipset, S. M.. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar

Paloheimo, Heikki. 2005. “Finland: Let the Force Be with the Leader – But Who Is the Leader?” In The Presidentialization of Politics. A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies, ed. Poguntke, Thomas and Webb, Paul. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 246–68.Google Scholar

Panebianco, Angelo. 1988. Political Parties: Organization and Power. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Trabalhadores, Partido dos. 1998. Resoluções de Encontros e Congressos: 1979–1998 [Resolutions of Meetings and Congresses, 1979–1998]. São Paulo: Partido dos Trabalhadores.Google Scholar

Pensamiento, Daniel. 2005. “Cierran filas los panistas y candidato.” Mural, December 7.Google Scholar

Pérez-Liñan, Aníbal. 2007. Crisis without Breakdown: Presidential Impeachment and the New Political Instability in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Persson, Torsten, and Tabellini, Guido. 2002. Political Economics: Explaining Economic Policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Pierce, Roy. 1995. Choosing the Chief: Presidential Elections in France and the United States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pierce, Roy. 2005. “The Executive Divided against Itself: Cohabitation in France, 1986–1988.” Governance 4(3): 270–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pierson, Paul. 2000. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review 94(2): 251–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pitkin, Hannah. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Poguntke, Thomas, and Webb, Paul, eds. 2005a. The Presidentialization of Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef

Poguntke, Thomas, and Webb, Paul. 2005b. “The Presidentialization of Politics in Democratic Societies: A Framework for Analysis.” In The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies, ed. Poguntke, Thomas and Webb, Paul. New York: Oxford University Press, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,Political Database of the Americas. http://pdba.georgetown.edu/Elecdata/Para/para.html (accessed June 4, 2007).

Poole, Keith. 2006. “Presidents, and House and Senate Means, 1st Dimension of Joint Space” and “Figure 3A: House, First Dimension.” www.voteview.org (accessed November 15).

Powell, G. Bingham Jr. 2000. Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Powell, G. Bingham. 2004. “Political Representation in Comparative Politics.” Annual Reviews of Political Science 7: 273–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Power, Timothy J. 2006. “Some Further Observations on the October 3 Results.” Center for Brazilian Studies, Oxford University. Unpublished.

Punnett, Robert M. 1992. Selecting the Party Leader: Britain in Comparative Perspective. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Radu, Alexandru. 2003. “The Romanian Constitution: Main Changes.” Sfera Politicii 102–03: 13–17.Google Scholar

Rae, Douglas. 1971. The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Rae, Nicol. 2006. “Exceptionalism in the United States.” In Handbook of Party Politics, ed. Katz, R. and Crotty, W.. London: Oxford University Press, 196–203.Google Scholar

Rahat, Gideon. 2004. “The Study of the Politics of Electoral Reform in the 1990s: Theoretical and Methodological Lessons.” Comparative Politics 36(4): 461–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rahat, Gideon. 2008. The Politics of Regime Structure Reform in Democracies: Israel in Comparative and Theoretical Perspective. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Rahat, Gideon. N.d. “The Politics of Electoral Reform Abolition: The Informed Process of Israel's Return to Its Previous System.” Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Unpublished manuscript.

Rahat, Gideon, and Hazan, Reuven. 2005. “Israel: The Politics of Extreme Proportionality.” In The Politics of Electoral Reform, ed. Gallagher, Michael and Mitchell, Paul. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 333–51.Google Scholar

Remington, Thomas. 2002. “Putin, the Duma, and Political Parties.” In Putin's Russia: Past Imperfect, Future Uncertain, ed. Herspring, Dale R.. New York: Rowan and Littlefield, 39–59.Google Scholar

Remington, Thomas. 2006. “Presidential Support in the Russian State Duma.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 31(1): 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,Reuters News. 2004. “Senegal president fires prime minister.” April 21.

Rigger, Shelley. 2002. “The Education of Chen Shui-bian: Taiwan's Experience of Divided Government.” Journal of Contemporary China 11(33): 613–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Riker, William. 1982. “The Two-Party System and Duverger's Law: An Essay on the History of Political Science.” American Political Science Review 76(4): 753–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Riker, William. 1987. The Development of American Federalism. Boston: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rohde, David. 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Romero, Vidal. 2005. “Presidents and Their Parties in the New Mexican Context: Explaining Vicente Fox and the PAN's Relationship.” Presented at the conference titled “Democratic Institutions in Latin America: Implications for Mexico's Evolving Democracy,” University of California, San Diego.

Roper, Steven D. 2008. “From Semi-Presidentialism to Parliamentarism: Regime Change and Presidential Power in Moldova.” Europe-Asia Studies 60(1): 113–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosa, Vera, Oliveira, Clarissa, and Cioccari, Vanice. 2006. “PT articula reaproximação com o presidente.” O Estado de São Paulo, October 31.Google Scholar

Rose, Richard, Munro, Neil, and Mackie, Tom, 1998. “Elections in Central and Eastern Europe since 1990.” Studies in Public Policy 300. Glasgow: Centre for the Study of Public Policy, University of Strathclyde.

Rose, Richard, Munro, N. and Mackie, T.. 1998. “Elections in Central and Eastern Europe Since 1990.” Studies in Public Policy 300. Glasgow: Center for the Study of Public Policy, University of Strathclyde.

Sallum, Brasilio Jr. and Kugelmas, Eduardo. 2004. “Sobre o Modo Lula de Governar” [On Lula's Mode of Governing]. In Brasil e Argentina Hoje: Política e Economia, ed. Sallum, Brasilio Jr.Baurú: Editora EDUSC, 255–88.Google Scholar

Samath, Feizal. 1991a. “Public Support Key in Campaign to Impeach Sri Lankan President.” Reuters News Service, September 1 (accessed through Factiva June 4, 2007).

Samath, Feizal. 1991b. “Sri Lankan President Wins Support from His Party” Reuters News Service, September 2 (accessed through Factiva June 4, 2007).

Samuels, David. 1999. “Incentives to Cultivate a Party Vote in Candidate-Centric Electoral Systems: Evidence from Brazil.” Comparative Political Studies 32(4): 487–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,Agence France Presse. 2000. “The Gubernatorial Coattails Effect: Federalism and Congressional Elections in Brazil.” Journal of Politics 62: 240–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,Agence France Presse. 2002. “Presidentialized Parties: The Separation of Powers and Party Organization and Behavior.” Comparative Political Studies 35(4): 461–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Samuels, David. 2003. Ambition, Federalism, and Legislative Politics in Brazil. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Samuels, David. 2004. “From Socialism to Social Democracy? The Evolution of the Workers' Party in Brazil.” Comparative Political Studies 37(9): 999–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Samuels, David. 2006. “Sources of Mass Partisanship in Brazil.” Latin American Politics and Society 48(2): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Samuels, David. 2007. “Separation of Powers.” In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, ed. Boix, Carles and Stokes, Susan. New York: Oxford University Press, 703–26.Google Scholar

Samuels, David. 2008a. “The Evolution of Petismo, 2002–2008.” Opinião Pública 14(2): 302–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Samuels, David. 2008b. “Brazilian Democracy under Lula and the PT.” In Constructing Democratic Governance in Latin America, 3rd ed., ed. Shifter, Michael and Dominguez, Jorge. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 152–76.Google Scholar

Samuels, David, and Shugart, Matthew Soberg. 2003. “Presidentialism, Elections and Representation.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 15(1): 33–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Samuels, David, and Snyder, Richard. 2001. “The Value of a Vote: Malapportionment in Comparative Perspective.” British Journal of Political Science 31(3): 651–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sandoval, Consuelo. 2004. “Legislativo invita a Poderes a discutir reformas,” La Prensa on-line. February 18. http://www-ni.laprensa.com.ni/archivo/2004/febrero-/18/politica/politica-20040218–02.html (accessed June 4, 2007).

Sartori, Giovanni. 1976. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework of Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sartori, Giovanni. 1987. The Theory of Democracy Revisited. Chathan, NJ: Chatham House.Google Scholar

Sartori, Giovanni. 1994. “Neither Presidentialism nor Parliamentarism.” In The Failure of Presidential Democracy, Vol. 1: Comparative Perspectives, ed. Linz, Juan J. and Valenzuela, Arturo. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 106–18.Google Scholar

Saúl, Lilia. 2005. “AN se reúne para aprobar plataforma electoral.” El Universal, November 12.Google Scholar

Saux, Jean Louis. 2000. “Charles Pasqua souhaite à son tour que la présidentielle précède les legislatives.” Le Monde electronic edition, September 27.Google Scholar

Schattschneider, E. Elmer. 1942. Party Government. New York: Farrar and Rinehart.Google Scholar

Schlesinger, Joseph. 1984. “On the Theory of Party Organization.” Journal of Politics 46(2): 369–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schlesinger, Joseph. 1991. Political Parties and the Winning of Office. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Schmidt, Vivien A. 1996. From State to Market? The Transformation of French Business and Government. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schmitter, Philippe, and Terry Lynn Karl. 1991. “What Democracy Is … and Is Not.” Journal of Democracy 2(3): 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schumpeter, Joseph. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar

Scott, Robert. 1969. “Political Parties and Policy-Making in Latin America.” In Political Parties and Political Development, ed. LaPalombara, Joseph and Weiner, Myron. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 331–68.Google Scholar

Scully, Timothy. 1992. Rethinking the Center: Party Politics in 19th- and 20th-century Chile. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Sedelius, Thomas. 2006. “The Tug-of-War between Presidents and Prime Ministers: Semi-Presidentialism in Central and Eastern Europe.” PhD dissertation, Orebro University.Google Scholar

Severinghaus, Sheldon R. 1996. “Mongolia in 1995: Gearing Up for the 1996 Elections.” Asian Survey 36(1): 95–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Severinghaus, Sheldon R. 2000. “Mongolia in 1998 and 1999: Past, Present, and Future at the New Millennium.” Asian Survey 40(1): 130–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shirk, David. 2005. Mexico's New Politics: The PAN and Democratic Change. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar

Shirk, David. 2006. “Choosing Mexico's 2006 Presidential Candidates.” Presented at the Working Group Meeting on Mexico's 2006 Elections, hosted by the Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University.

Shugart, Matthew. 1988. “Duverger's Rule, District Magnitude, and Presidentialism.” PhD dissertation, University of California, Irvine.

Shugart, Matthew S. 1995. “The Electoral Cycle and Institutional Sources of Divided Presidential Government.” American Political Science Review 89: 327–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shugart, Matthew S. 1999. “Presidentialism, Parliamentarism and the Provision of Collective Goods in Less-Developed Countries.” Constitutional Political Economy 10(1): 53–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shugart, Matthew S. 2005. “Semi-Presidentialism: Dual Executive and Mixed Authority Patterns.” French Politics 3(3): 323–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shugart, Matthew S. 2006. “Comparative Executive-Legislative Relations.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, ed. Rhodes, R. A. W., Binder, S. A., and Rockman, B. A.. New York: Oxford University Press, 344–65.Google Scholar

Shugart, Matthew S., and Carey, John M.. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shugart, Matthew S., and Haggard, Stephan. 2001. “Institutions and Public Policy in Presidential Systems.” In Presidents, Parliaments, and Policy, ed. Haggard, Stephan and McCubbins, M. D.. New York: Cambridge University Press, 64–104.Google Scholar

Shugart, Matthew S., Valdini, Melody Ellis, and Suominen, Kati. 2005. “Looking for Locals: Voter Information Demands and Personal Vote-Earning Attributes of Legislators under Proportional Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 29, 2 (April): 437–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Siavelis, Peter, and Morgenstern, Scott, eds. 2008a. Pathways to Power. College Station: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Siavelis, Peter, and Morgenstern, Scott. 2008b. “Introduction: Political Recruitment and Candidate Selection in Latin America: A Framework for Analysis.” In Pathways to Power in Latin America, ed. Peter Siavelis and Morgenstern, Scott. College Park: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar

Skach, Cindy. 2005. Borrowing Constitutional Designs: Constitutional Law in Weimar Germany and the French Fifth Republic. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Skach, Cindy. 2007. “The ‘Newest’ Separation of Powers: Semipresidentialism.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 5(1): 93–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skowronek, Steven. 1997. The Politics Presidents Make: Leadership from John Adams to Bill Clinton. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Smith, Peter H. 1979. Labyrinths of Power: Political Recruitment in Twentieth-Century Mexico. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Sorauf, Frank. 1968. Party Politics in America. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Stark, Leonard P. 1996. Choosing a Leader: Party Leadership Contests in Britain from Macmillan to Blair. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stellman, H. 1996. “Electing a Prime Minister and a Parliament: The Israeli Election of 1996.” Parliamentary Affairs 41(4): 648–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stirk, Peter. 2002. “Hugo Preuss, German Political Thought and the Weimar Constitution.” History of Political Thought 23(3): 497–516.Google Scholar

Stokes, Susan C. 1999. “Political Parties and Democracy.” Annual Review of Political Science 2: 243–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stokes, Susan C. 2001. Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,Straits Times (Singapore). 1991. “Eight MPs expelled over bid to impeach president.” September 8 (accessed through Factiva June 4, 2007).

Strøm, Kaare. 1990. “A Behavioral Theory of Competitive Political Parties.” American Journal of Political Science 34(2): 565–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strøm, Kaare. 2003. “Parliamentary Democracy and Delegation.” In Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies, ed. Strøm, Kaare, Müller, Wolfgang C., and Bergman, Torbjorn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 55–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strøm, Kaare, and Müller, Wolfgang, eds. 1999. Policy, Office or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Subramanian, Nirupama. 1999. “Sri Lanka's presidency – The most powerful job in the world.” Indian Express, December 16.Google Scholar

Sundquist, James. 1992. Constitutional Reform and Effective Government. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar

Taagepera, Rein. 2007. Predicting Party Sizes: The Logic of Simple Electoral Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taagepera, Rein, and Shugart, Matthew Soberg. 1989. Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Tam Cho, Wendy K., and Gaines, Brian J.. 2004. “The Limits of Ecological Inference: The Case of Split-Ticket Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 48: 152–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tavits, Margit. 2009. “Direct Presidential Elections and Turnout in Parliamentary Contests.” Political Research Quarterly 62(1): 42–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tegos, Alexandros. 2007. “Until Death Do Us Part – On the Assumption that Leaders Act to Survive in Office.” University of Mannheim. Unpublished.

Thies, M. F. 2001. “Keeping Tabs on Partners: The Logic of Delegation in Coalition Governments.” American Journal of Political Science 45(3): 580–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Torcal, Mariano, and Mainwaring, Scott. 2003. “The Political Recrafting of Social Bases of Party Competition: Chile 1973–95.” British Journal of Political Science 33: 55–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Torgovnik, E. 2000. “Strategies under a New Electoral System: The Labor Party in the 1996 Israeli Elections.” Party Politics 6(1): 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tsebelis, George. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tsebelis, George, and Rizova, Tatiana. 2007. “Presidential Conditional Agenda Setting in the Former Communist Countries.” Comparative Political Studies 40(10): 1155–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,UNDP. 2003. Atlas do Desenvolvimento Humano no Brasil [Atlas of Human Development]. Version 1.0.0 United Nations Development Program for Brazil.

Biezen, Ingrid. 2004. “How Political Parties Shape Democracy.” Center for the Study of Democracy, University of California, Irvine. Available at http://escholarship.org/uc/item/17p1m0dx (accessed November 3, 2009).

Ware, Alan. 1996. Political Parties and Party Systems. New York: Oxford University Press.

Warwick, Paul. 1994. Government Survival in Parliamentary Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Weber, Max. [1917] 1978. Parliament and Government in a Reconstructed Germany, Volume 3 ofEconomy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, ed. Guenther, R. and Wittich, C.. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Weber, Max. [1919] 1958. “Politics as a Vocation.” In From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, ed. Gerth, Hans and Mills, C. Wright. New York: Oxford University Press, 77–128.Google Scholar

Weinbaum, Marvin, and Judd, Dennis. 1970. “In Search of a Mandated Congress.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 14: 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wiesehomeier, Nina, and Benoit, Kenneth. 2009. “Presidents, Parties and Policy Competition.” Journal of Politics 71(4): 1435–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Willey, Joseph. 1998. “Institutional Arrangements and the Success of New Parties in Old Democracies.” In Parties and Democracy, ed. Hofferbert, R.. Oxford: Blackwell, 229–46.Google Scholar

Wilson, Woodrow. 1908. Constitutional Government in the United States. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Wolinetz, Steven. 2002. “Beyond the Catch-all Party: Approaches to the Study of Parties and Party Organization in Contemporary Democracies.” In Political Parties: Old Concepts and New Challenges, ed. Gunther, R., Montero, J. R., and Linz, J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 136–65.Google Scholar

,World Bank. 2007. “World Development Indicators” (online resource). Washington, DC: World Bank.