Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Priming is swell, but it's far from simple

  • Jayden Ziegler (a1), Jesse Snedeker (a1) and Eva Wittenberg (a2)
Abstract
Abstract

Clearly, structural priming is a valuable tool for probing linguistic representation. But we don't think that the existing results provide strong support for Branigan & Pickering's (B&P's) model, largely because the priming effects are more confusing and diverse than their theory would suggest. Fortunately, there are a number of other experimental tools available, and linguists are increasingly making use of them.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Arai M., van Gompel R. P. G. & Scheepers C. (2007) Priming ditransitive structures in comprehension. Cognitive Psychology 54(3):218–50. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.07.001.
Arunachalam S. (2013) Experimental methods for linguists. Language and Linguistics Compass 7(4):221–32.
Bencini G., Bock K. & Goldberg A. (2002) How abstract is grammar? Evidence from structural priming in language production. Poster presented at the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, New York, NY.
Berko J. (1958) The child's learning of English morphology. WORD 14(2–3):150–77.
Cai Z. G., Pickering M. J. & Branigan H. P. (2012) Mapping concepts to syntax: Evidence from structural priming in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Memory and Language 66(4):833–49. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.03.009.
Chamberlin T. C. (1897) Studies for students: The method of multiple working hypotheses. The Journal of Geology 5(8):837–48.
Chang F., Bock K. & Goldberg A. E. (2003) Can thematic roles leave traces of their places? Cognition 90(1):2949. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00123-9.
Chemla E. & Bott L. (2015) Using structural priming to study scopal representations and operations. Linguistic Inquiry 46(1):157–72. doi:10.1162/ling.
Cho-Reyes S., Mack J. E. & Thompson C. K. (2016) Grammatical encoding and learning in agrammatic aphasia: Evidence from structural priming. Journal of Memory and Language 91:202–18.
Cowart W. (1997) Experimental syntax: Applying objective methods to sentence judgments. Sage.
Erickson L. C. & Thiessen E. D. (2015) Statistical learning in language: Theory, validity, and predictions of a statistical learning account of language acquisition. Developmental Review 37:66108.
Feiman R. & Snedeker J. (2016) The logic in language: How all quantifiers are alike, but each quantifier is different. Cognitive Psychology 87:2952. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.04.002.
Ferreira V. S. (2003) The persistence of optional complementizer production: Why saying “that” is not saying “that” at all. Journal of Memory and Language 48:379–98. doi:10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00523-5.
Fisher C. (2002) Structural limits on verb mapping: The role of abstract structure in 2.5-year-olds' interpretation of novel verbs. Developmental Science 5(1):5564.
Frankland S. M. & Greene J. D. (2015) An architecture for encoding sentence meaning in left mid-superior temporal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112(37):11732–37. doi:10.1073/pnas.1421236112.
Gropen J., Pinker S., Hollander M., Goldberg R. & Wilson R. (1989) The learnability and acquisition of the dative alternation in English. Language 65(2):203–57.
Hare M. L. & Goldberg A. E. (1999) Structural priming: Purely syntactic? In: Proceedings of the Twenty-first Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, ed. Hahn M. & Stones S. C., pp. 208–11. Erlbaum.
Haxby J. V., Gobbini M. I., Furey M. L., Ishai A., Schouten J. L. & Pietrini P. (2001) Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex. Science 293:2425–29.
Myers J. (2009) The design and analysis of small-scale syntactic judgment experiments. Lingua 119:425–44. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2008.09.003.
Naigles L. (1990) Children use syntax to learn verb meanings. Journal of Child Language 17(2):357–74.
Pothos E. M. (2007) Theories of artificial grammar learning. Psychological Bulletin 133(2):227–44.
Prasada S. & Pinker S. (1993) Generalization of regular and irregular morphological patterns. Language and Cognitive Processes 8:156.
Raffray C. N. & Pickering M. J. (2010) How do people construct logical form during language comprehension? Psychological Science 21(8):1090–97. doi:10.1177/0956797610375446.
Reber A. S. (1967) Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 6(6):855–63.
Saffran J. R., Hauser M. D., Seibel R., Kapfhamer J., Tsao F. & Cushman F. (2008) Grammatical pattern learning by human infants and cotton-top tamarin monkeys. Cognition 107:479500.
Salamoura A. & Williams J. N. (2007) Processing verb argument structure across languages: Evidence for shared representations in the bilingual lexicon. Applied Psycholinguistics 28(4):627–60. doi:10.1017/S0142716407070348.
Sorace A. & Keller F. (2005) Gradience in linguistic data. Lingua 115:14971524.
Sprouse J. & Almeida D. (2012) Assessing the reliability of textbook data in syntax: Adger's core syntax. Journal of Linguistics 48(03):609–52.
Sprouse J., Schütze C. T. & Almeida D. (2013) A comparison of informal and formal acceptability judgments using a random sample from linguistic inquiry 2001–2010. Lingua 134: 219–48. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2013.07.002.
Thothathiri M. & Snedeker J. (2008a) Give and take: Syntactic priming during spoken language comprehension. Cognition 108:5168. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.12.012.
Thothathiri M. & Snedeker J. (2008b) Syntactic priming during language comprehension in three- and four-year-old children. Journal of Memory and Language 58(2):188213. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.06.012.
Ziegler J. & Snedeker J. (2016a) Structural priming across development: The lexical boost, abstract priming, and task demands. Poster presented at the Forty-first Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston, MA.
Ziegler J. & Snedeker J. (2016b) Toward a comprehensive view of structural priming: What gets primed when. Poster presented at the Twenty-ninth Annual Meeting of the CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, Gainesville, FL.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 21 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 91 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 10th November 2017 - 24th February 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.