Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-45ctf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-17T16:07:54.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The logic of syntactic priming and acceptability judgments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2017

Phoebe Gaston
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742. pgaston@umd.edu znhuang@umd.edu colin@umd.edu phoebegaston.wordpress.com ling.umd.edu/~znhuang colinphillips.net
Nick Huang
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742. pgaston@umd.edu znhuang@umd.edu colin@umd.edu phoebegaston.wordpress.com ling.umd.edu/~znhuang colinphillips.net
Colin Phillips
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742. pgaston@umd.edu znhuang@umd.edu colin@umd.edu phoebegaston.wordpress.com ling.umd.edu/~znhuang colinphillips.net

Abstract

A critical flaw in Branigan & Pickering's (B&P's) advocacy of structural priming is the absence of a theory of priming. This undermines their claims about the value of priming as a methodology. In contrast, acceptability judgments enable clearer inferences about structure. It is important to engage thoroughly with the logic behind different structural diagnostics.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable