Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Returning to Victorian Competition, Ownership, and Regulation: An Empirical Study of European Telecommunications at the Turn of the Twentieth Century

  • SCOTT WALLSTEN (a1)
Abstract

This article uses an original dataset to test the effects of government monopoly service, competition, and regulation on the development of the telephone industry in Europe in the late 1800s and early 1900s. Like today, there were stateowned monopolies in some countries, vigorous competition in others, and others with private firms operating under restrictive concessions. The main determinant of government control of the telephone sector was the state's involvement in the telegraph. Countries with competition between telephone providers and whose governments did not threaten to expropriate firms' assets saw higher telephone penetration and lower prices, even in rural areas.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Andersson-SkogLena. 2000National Patterns in the Regulation of Railways and Telephony in the Nordic Countries to 1950.” Scandinavian Economic History Review 48, no. 2 pp. 3046.

FieldAlexander J. 1994French Optical Telegraphy, 1793–1855: Hardware, Software, Administration.” Technology and Culture 35, no. 2 31547.

Foreman-PeckJames. 1985Competition and Performance in the British Telecommunications Industry.” Telecommunications Policy 9, no. 3 21528.

Foreman-PeckJames, and RobertMillward. 1994. Public and Private Ownership of British Industry 1820–1990, Oxford: Oxford University Press,

GabelRichard. 1969The Early Competitive Era in Telephone Communication, 1893–1920.” Law and Contemporary Problems 34, no. 2 34059.

GlaeserEdward L. 2001. “Public Ownership in the American City.” Harvard Institute of Economic Research, Research Paper No. 1930. Cambridge, MA,

HolcombeA. N. 1906The Telephone in Great Britain.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 21, no. 1 96135.

HolcombeA. N. 1907Municipal Ownership of Telephones in Great Britain.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 21, no 4 64550.

JayakarKrishna P. 1999Local Exchange Competition in Early U.S. Network development: Considerations for Developing Countries.” Telecommunications Policy 23, no. 5 37587.

MegginsonWilliam L., and Jeffrey M.Netter. 2001From State to Market: A Survey of Empirical Studies on Privatization.” Journal of Economic Literature 39, no. 2 32189.

RosAgustin J. 1999Does Ownership or Competition Matter? The Effects of Telecommunications Reform on Network Expansion and Efficiency.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 15, no. 1 6592.

WallstenScott. 2001An Econometric Analysis of Telecom Competition, Privatization, and Regulation in Africa and Latin America.” Journal of Industrial Economics 49, no. 1 120.

WelleniusBjorn, and PeterStern. 1994. “Implementing Reforms in the Telecommunications Sector: Lessons From Experience.” In Implementing Reforms in the Telecommunications Sector: Lessons From Experience, edited by BjornWellenius and PeterStern, 163. Washington, DC: The World Bank,

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Journal of Economic History
  • ISSN: 0022-0507
  • EISSN: 1471-6372
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-economic-history
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 5 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 177 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 29th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.