Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-79b67bcb76-b5nxq Total loading time: 0.222 Render date: 2021-05-16T10:04:13.998Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

Shifting Standards for Political Methodologists? Historical Trends in the Society for Political Methodology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2018

Sara McLaughlin Mitchell
Affiliation:
University of Iowa
Christopher H. Achen
Affiliation:
Princeton University
Corresponding

Abstract

Image of the first page of this article. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.
Type
Symposium: What is a Political Methodologist?
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Achen, Christopher. 2014. “Why Do We Need Diversity in the Political Methodology Society?” The Political Methodologist 21 (2): 2528.Google Scholar
Barnes, Tiffany D., Beaulieu, Emily, and Krupnikov, Yanna. 2014. “An Assessment of the Visions in Methodology Initiative: Directions for Increasing Women’s Participation.” The Political Methodologist 21 (2): 1016.Google Scholar
Blau, Francine, Currie, Janet M., Croson, Rachel T. A., and Ginther, Donna K.. 2010. “Can Mentoring Help Female Assistant Professors? Interim Results from a Randomized Trial.” NBER Working Paper 15707.Google Scholar
Boehmke, Frederick J. 2014. “Thoughts on Mentoring to Train and Retain Methodologists.” The Political Methodologist 21 (2): 2025.Google Scholar
Dion, Michelle. 2014. “An Effort to Increase Women’s Participation: The Visions in Methodology Initiative.” The Political Methodologist 21 (2): 69.Google Scholar
Dion, Michelle, and Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin. 2012. “Gender, Participation, and Citations: Comparing Peace Science, Political Methodology, State Politics, and IPE Conferences.” Presentation at the Annual Meeting of the Peace Science Society, Savannah, GA.Google Scholar
Gow, David. 1985. “Quantification and Statistics in the Early Years of American Political Science, 1800–1922.” Political Methodology 11: 118.Google Scholar
Lewis Beck, Michael. 2008. “Forty Years of Publishing in Quantitative Methodology” in The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, eds. Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Brady, Henry E., and Collier, David, 814–27. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Morrow-Jones, Hazel, and Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M.. 2014. “Implicit Bias and Why It Matters to the Field of Political Methodology.” The Political Methodologist 21 (2): 1620.Google Scholar
Shannon, Megan. 2014. “Barriers to Women’s Participation in Political Methodology: Graduate School and Beyond.” The Political Methodologist 21 (2): 26.Google Scholar
Unkovic, Cait, Sen, Maya, and Quinn, Kevin M.. 2016. “Does Encouragement Matter in Improving Gender Imbalances in Technical Fields? Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial.” PloS ONE 11 (4): 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Shifting Standards for Political Methodologists? Historical Trends in the Society for Political Methodology
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Shifting Standards for Political Methodologists? Historical Trends in the Society for Political Methodology
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Shifting Standards for Political Methodologists? Historical Trends in the Society for Political Methodology
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *