Skip to main content
×
Home

How expensive is a cardioprotective diet? Analysis from the CRESSIDA study

  • Dianne P Reidlinger (a1) (a2), Thomas AB Sanders (a2) and Louise M Goff (a2)
Abstract
Abstract Objective

To determine whether a cardioprotective dietary intervention based on UK dietary guidelines was more expensive than a conventional UK diet.

Design

Cost analysis of food records collected at baseline and after a 12-week dietary intervention of a cardioprotective diet v. conventional UK diet.

Setting

A randomized controlled dietary intervention study (CRESSIDA; ISRCTN 92382106) investigating the impact of following a diet consistent with UK dietary guidelines on CVD risk.

Subjects

Participants were healthy UK residents aged 40–70 years. A sub-sample of participants was randomly selected from those who completed the cardioprotective dietary intervention (n 20) or the conventional UK dietary intervention (n 20).

Results

Baseline diet costs did not differ between groups; mean daily food cost for all participants was £6·12 (sd £1·83). The intervention diets were not more expensive: at end point the mean daily cost of the cardioprotective diet was £6·43 (sd £2·05) v. the control diet which was £6·53 (sd £1·53; P=0·86).

Conclusions

There was no evidence that consumption of a cardioprotective diet was more expensive than a conventional dietary pattern. Despite the perception that healthier foods are less affordable, these results suggest that cost may not be a barrier when modifying habitual intake and under tightly controlled trial conditions. The identification of specific food groups that may be a cost concern for individuals may be useful for tailoring interventions for CVD prevention for individuals and populations.

Copyright
Corresponding author
* Corresponding author: Email dreidlin@bond.edu.au
References
Hide All
1. Townsend MS, Aaron GJ, Monsivais P et al. (2009) Less-energy-dense diets of low-income women in California are associated with higher energy-adjusted diet costs. Am J Clin Nutr 89, 12201226.
2. Aggarwal A, Monsivais P, Cook AJ et al. (2011) Does diet cost mediate the relation between socioeconomic position and diet quality? Eur J Clin Nutr 65, 10591066.
3. Bernstein AM, Bloom DE, Rosner BA et al. (2010) Relation of food cost to healthfulness of diet among US women. Am J Clin Nutr 92, 11971203.
4. Andrieu E, Darmon N & Drewnowski A (2006) Low-cost diets: more energy, fewer nutrients. Eur J Clin Nutr 60, 434436.
5. Schröder H, Marrugat J & Covas MI (2006) High monetary costs of dietary patterns associated with lower body mass index: a population-based study. Int J Obes (Lond) 30, 15741579.
6. Lopez CN, Martinez-Gonzalez MA, Sanchez-Villegas A et al. (2009) Costs of Mediterranean and western dietary patterns in a Spanish cohort and their relationship with prospective weight change. J Epidemiol Community Health 63, 920927.
7. Carter SM & Little M (2007) Justifying knowledge, justifying method, taking action: epistemologies, methodologies, and methods in qualitative research. Qual Health Res 17, 13161328.
8. Morris MA, Hulme C, Clarke GP et al. (2014) What is the cost of a healthy diet? Using diet data from the UK Women’s Cohort Study. J Epidemiol Community Health 68, 10431049.
9. Timmins KA, Hulme C & Cade JE (2015) The monetary value of diets consumed by British adults: an exploration into sociodemographic differences in individual-level diet costs. Public Health Nutr 18, 151159.
10. Rao M, Afshin A, Singh G et al. (2013) Do healthier foods and diet patterns cost more than less healthy options? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 3, e004277.
11. Ottelin A-M, Lindström J, Peltonen M et al. (2007) Costs of a self-selected, health-promoting diet among the participants of the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study. Diabetes Care 30, 12751277.
12. Cleary J, Casey S, Hofsteede C et al. (2012) Does a low glycaemic index (GI) diet cost more during pregnancy? Nutrients 4, 17591766.
13. Goulet J, Lamarche B & Lemieux S (2008) A nutritional intervention promoting a Mediterranean food pattern does not afffect total daily dietary cost in North American women in free-living conditions. J Nutr 138, 5459.
14. Burney J & Haughton B (2002) EFNEP: a nutrition education program that demonstrates cost-benefit. J Am Diet Assoc 102, 3945.
15. Rydén P, Sydner YM & Hagfors L (2008) Counting the cost of healthy eating: a Swedish comparison of Mediterranean-style and ordinary diets. Int J Consum Stud 32, 138146.
16. Reidlinger DP, Darzi J, Hall WL et al. (2015) How effective are current dietary guidelines for cardiovascular disease prevention in healthy middle-aged and older men and women? A randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr 101, 922930.
17. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2010) Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Public Health Guideline [PH25]. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ph25 (accessed December 2016).
18. Sadler K, Nicholson S, Steer T et al. (2012) National Diet and Nutrition Survey – Assessment of Dietary Sodium in Adults (Aged 19 to 64 Years) in England, 2011. London: Food Standards Agency.
19. Food Standards Agency (2002) McCance and Widdowson’s The Composition of Foods, 6th Summary Edition. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry.
20. Campbell J, Foskett D & Ceserani V (2008) Practical Cookery, 11th ed. London: Hodder Education.
21. BBC Good Food (2014) BBC Good Food Recipes and Cooking Tips 2013. http://www.bbcgoodfood.com (accessed August 2014).
22. Raynor H (2002) A cost-analysis of adopting a healthful diet in a family-based obesity treatment program. J Am Diet Assoc 102, 645656.
23. Cade J, Upmeier H, Calvert C et al. (1999) Costs of a healthy diet: analysis from the UK Women’s Cohort Study. Public Health Nutr 2, 505512.
24. Darmon N, Briend A & Drewnowski A (2004) Energy-dense diets are associated with lower diet costs: a community study of French adults. Public Health Nutr 7, 2127.
25. Aggarwal A, Monsivais P & Drewnowski A (2012) Nutrient intakes linked to better health outcomes are associated with higher diet costs in the US. PLoS One 7, e37533.
26. Drewnowski A & Eichelsdoerfer P (2009) The Mediterranean diet: does it have to cost more? Public Health Nutr 12, 16211628.
27. Department for Environment Food & Rural Affairs (2013) Food Statistics Pocketbook 2012. London: DEFRA.
28. Carlson A & Frazāo E (2012) Are Healthy Foods Really More Expensive? It Depends on How You Measure the Price , Economic Information Bulletin no. EIB-96. Washinngton, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
29. Monsivais P & Drewnowski A (2009) Lower-energy-density diets are associated with higher monetary costs per kilocalorie and are consumed by women of higher socioeconomic status. J Am Diet Assoc 109, 814822.
30. Ledikwe JH, Blanck HM, Khan LK et al. (2006) Low-energy-density diets are associated with high diet quality in adults in the United States. J Am Diet Assoc 106, 11721180.
31. Darmon N, Darmon M, Maillot M et al. (2005) A nutrient density standard for vegetables and fruits: nutrients per calorie and nutrients per unit cost. J Am Diet Assoc 105, 18811887.
32. Haynes-Maslow L, Parsons SE, Wheeler SB et al. (2013) A qualitative study of perceived barriers to fruit and vegetable consumption among low-income populations, North Carolina, 2011. Prev Chronic Dis 10, E34.
33. Williams LK, Abbott G, Thornton L et al. (2014) Improving perceptions of healthy food affordability: results from a pilot intervention. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 11, 33.
34. Office for National Statistics (2013) Living Costs and Food Survey: Technical Report for Survey Year January–December 2011. Great Britain and Northern Ireland. London: ONS.
35. Drewnowski A, Monsivais P, Maillot M et al. (2007) Low-energy-density diets are associated with higher diet quality and higher diet costs in French adults. J Am Diet Assoc 107, 10281032.
36. Kennedy LA, Hunt C & Hodgson P (1998) Nutrition education program based on EFNEP for low-income women in the United Kingdom: ‘Friends with Food’. J Nutr Educ 30, 8999.
37. Pettigrew S, Moore S, Pratt IS et al. (2016) Evaluation outcomes of a long-running adult nutrition education programme. Public Health Nutr 19, 743752.
38. Hardcastle SJ & Blake N (2016) Influences underlying family food choices in mothers from an economically disadvantaged community. Eat Behav 20, 18.
39. Office for National Statistics (2013) Chapter 5: Weekly household expenditure, an analysis of the regions of England and the countries of the United Kingdom. In Family Spending 2012 [G Horsfield, editor]. London: ONS.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Public Health Nutrition
  • ISSN: 1368-9800
  • EISSN: 1475-2727
  • URL: /core/journals/public-health-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 8
Total number of PDF views: 93 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 905 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 18th January 2017 - 11th December 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.