Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

How expensive is a cardioprotective diet? Analysis from the CRESSIDA study

  • Dianne P Reidlinger (a1) (a2), Thomas AB Sanders (a2) and Louise M Goff (a2)
Abstract Objective

To determine whether a cardioprotective dietary intervention based on UK dietary guidelines was more expensive than a conventional UK diet.


Cost analysis of food records collected at baseline and after a 12-week dietary intervention of a cardioprotective diet v. conventional UK diet.


A randomized controlled dietary intervention study (CRESSIDA; ISRCTN 92382106) investigating the impact of following a diet consistent with UK dietary guidelines on CVD risk.


Participants were healthy UK residents aged 40–70 years. A sub-sample of participants was randomly selected from those who completed the cardioprotective dietary intervention (n 20) or the conventional UK dietary intervention (n 20).


Baseline diet costs did not differ between groups; mean daily food cost for all participants was £6·12 (sd £1·83). The intervention diets were not more expensive: at end point the mean daily cost of the cardioprotective diet was £6·43 (sd £2·05) v. the control diet which was £6·53 (sd £1·53; P=0·86).


There was no evidence that consumption of a cardioprotective diet was more expensive than a conventional dietary pattern. Despite the perception that healthier foods are less affordable, these results suggest that cost may not be a barrier when modifying habitual intake and under tightly controlled trial conditions. The identification of specific food groups that may be a cost concern for individuals may be useful for tailoring interventions for CVD prevention for individuals and populations.

Corresponding author
* Corresponding author: Email
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

1. MS Townsend , GJ Aaron , P Monsivais et al. (2009) Less-energy-dense diets of low-income women in California are associated with higher energy-adjusted diet costs. Am J Clin Nutr 89, 12201226.

2. A Aggarwal , P Monsivais , AJ Cook et al. (2011) Does diet cost mediate the relation between socioeconomic position and diet quality? Eur J Clin Nutr 65, 10591066.

3. AM Bernstein , DE Bloom , BA Rosner et al. (2010) Relation of food cost to healthfulness of diet among US women. Am J Clin Nutr 92, 11971203.

4. E Andrieu , N Darmon & A Drewnowski (2006) Low-cost diets: more energy, fewer nutrients. Eur J Clin Nutr 60, 434436.

5. H Schröder , J Marrugat & MI Covas (2006) High monetary costs of dietary patterns associated with lower body mass index: a population-based study. Int J Obes (Lond) 30, 15741579.

6. CN Lopez , MA Martinez-Gonzalez , A Sanchez-Villegas et al. (2009) Costs of Mediterranean and western dietary patterns in a Spanish cohort and their relationship with prospective weight change. J Epidemiol Community Health 63, 920927.

7. SM Carter & M Little (2007) Justifying knowledge, justifying method, taking action: epistemologies, methodologies, and methods in qualitative research. Qual Health Res 17, 13161328.

8. MA Morris , C Hulme , GP Clarke et al. (2014) What is the cost of a healthy diet? Using diet data from the UK Women’s Cohort Study. J Epidemiol Community Health 68, 10431049.

9. KA Timmins , C Hulme & JE Cade (2015) The monetary value of diets consumed by British adults: an exploration into sociodemographic differences in individual-level diet costs. Public Health Nutr 18, 151159.

10. M Rao , A Afshin , G Singh et al. (2013) Do healthier foods and diet patterns cost more than less healthy options? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 3, e004277.

11. A-M Ottelin , J Lindström , M Peltonen et al. (2007) Costs of a self-selected, health-promoting diet among the participants of the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study. Diabetes Care 30, 12751277.

12. J Cleary , S Casey , C Hofsteede et al. (2012) Does a low glycaemic index (GI) diet cost more during pregnancy? Nutrients 4, 17591766.

14. J Burney & B Haughton (2002) EFNEP: a nutrition education program that demonstrates cost-benefit. J Am Diet Assoc 102, 3945.

15. P Rydén , YM Sydner & L Hagfors (2008) Counting the cost of healthy eating: a Swedish comparison of Mediterranean-style and ordinary diets. Int J Consum Stud 32, 138146.

16. DP Reidlinger , J Darzi , WL Hall et al. (2015) How effective are current dietary guidelines for cardiovascular disease prevention in healthy middle-aged and older men and women? A randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr 101, 922930.

22. H Raynor (2002) A cost-analysis of adopting a healthful diet in a family-based obesity treatment program. J Am Diet Assoc 102, 645656.

23. J Cade , H Upmeier , C Calvert et al. (1999) Costs of a healthy diet: analysis from the UK Women’s Cohort Study. Public Health Nutr 2, 505512.

24. N Darmon , A Briend & A Drewnowski (2004) Energy-dense diets are associated with lower diet costs: a community study of French adults. Public Health Nutr 7, 2127.

25. A Aggarwal , P Monsivais & A Drewnowski (2012) Nutrient intakes linked to better health outcomes are associated with higher diet costs in the US. PLoS One 7, e37533.

26. A Drewnowski & P Eichelsdoerfer (2009) The Mediterranean diet: does it have to cost more? Public Health Nutr 12, 16211628.

29. P Monsivais & A Drewnowski (2009) Lower-energy-density diets are associated with higher monetary costs per kilocalorie and are consumed by women of higher socioeconomic status. J Am Diet Assoc 109, 814822.

30. JH Ledikwe , HM Blanck , LK Khan et al. (2006) Low-energy-density diets are associated with high diet quality in adults in the United States. J Am Diet Assoc 106, 11721180.

31. N Darmon , M Darmon , M Maillot et al. (2005) A nutrient density standard for vegetables and fruits: nutrients per calorie and nutrients per unit cost. J Am Diet Assoc 105, 18811887.

32. L Haynes-Maslow , SE Parsons , SB Wheeler et al. (2013) A qualitative study of perceived barriers to fruit and vegetable consumption among low-income populations, North Carolina, 2011. Prev Chronic Dis 10, E34.

33. LK Williams , G Abbott , L Thornton et al. (2014) Improving perceptions of healthy food affordability: results from a pilot intervention. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 11, 33.

35. A Drewnowski , P Monsivais , M Maillot et al. (2007) Low-energy-density diets are associated with higher diet quality and higher diet costs in French adults. J Am Diet Assoc 107, 10281032.

36. LA Kennedy , C Hunt & P Hodgson (1998) Nutrition education program based on EFNEP for low-income women in the United Kingdom: ‘Friends with Food’. J Nutr Educ 30, 8999.

37. S Pettigrew , S Moore , IS Pratt et al. (2016) Evaluation outcomes of a long-running adult nutrition education programme. Public Health Nutr 19, 743752.

38. SJ Hardcastle & N Blake (2016) Influences underlying family food choices in mothers from an economically disadvantaged community. Eat Behav 20, 18.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Public Health Nutrition
  • ISSN: 1368-9800
  • EISSN: 1475-2727
  • URL: /core/journals/public-health-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 5
Total number of PDF views: 53 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 785 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 18th January 2017 - 21st July 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.