Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Purchases of ready-to-eat cereals vary across US household sociodemographic categories according to nutritional value and advertising targets

  • Katia Castetbon (a1) (a2), Jennifer L Harris (a2) and Marlene B Schwartz (a2)
Abstract
Objective

To describe ready-to-eat (RTE) cereal purchases in 2008 in the USA according to cereal nutritional quality and marketing strategy and household sociodemographic characteristics.

Design

Cross-sectional study of purchases in one year. Each type of cereal was assigned to one of four nutrition quality categories (based on Nutrient Profile Index, NPI) and one of four advertising categories based on television exposure and analysis of packaging (child-targeted, family-targeted, adult-targeted and no television advertising). Medians and distributions of purchase indicators were calculated for the cereal categories and the distributions were compared across sociodemographic groups.

Setting

RTE cereals (n 249) with complete label and nutritional content.

Subjects

RTE cereal purchases according to household sociodemographic characteristics obtained from Nielsen Homescan, a nationally representative panel of households.

Results

Purchases of RTE cereals were highest in households with one or more child and lowest in African-American and Asian households, as well as those earning <$US 30 000 per annum. The lowest-quality products were purchased by four times as many households as the highest-quality cereals, but loyalty to these products was lower. Purchases of cereals by households with children and in African-American and Hispanic households increased as cereal nutritional quality declined. Compared with non-advertised products, advertised child-targeted cereals were purchased thirteen times more frequently; family-targeted brand purchases were ten times higher; and adult-targeted cereals were purchased four times more frequently.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that improving the nutritional quality of RTE cereals with advertising targeted to children could also lead to increased consumption of healthier products by young people.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Purchases of ready-to-eat cereals vary across US household sociodemographic categories according to nutritional value and advertising targets
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Purchases of ready-to-eat cereals vary across US household sociodemographic categories according to nutritional value and advertising targets
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Purchases of ready-to-eat cereals vary across US household sociodemographic categories according to nutritional value and advertising targets
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Email katia.castetbon@univ-paris13.fr
References
Hide All
1. Rampersaud, GC, Pereira, MA, Girard, BL et al. (2005) Breakfast habits, nutritional status, body weight, and academic performance in children and adolescents. J Am Diet Assoc 105, 743760.
2. Timlin, MT, Pereira, MA, Story, M et al. (2008) Breakfast eating and weight change in a 5-year prospective analysis of adolescents: Project EAT (Eating Among Teens). Pediatrics 121, e638e645.
3. Alexy, U, Wicher, M & Kersting, M (2010) Breakfast trends in children and adolescents: frequency and quality. Public Health Nutr 13, 17951802.
4. Siega-Riz, AM, Popkin, BM & Carson, T (1998) Trends in breakfast consumption for children in the United States from 1965–1991. Am J Clin Nutr 67, issue 4, 748S756S.
5. Deshmukh-Taskar, PR, Nicklas, TA, O'Neil, CE et al. (2010) The relationship of breakfast skipping and type of breakfast consumption with nutrient intake and weight status in children and adolescents: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999–2006. J Am Diet Assoc 110, 869878.
6. US Department of Agriculture (2010) MyPyramid for Kids Web site. http://www.mypyramid.gov (accessed January 2011).
7. Albertson, AM, Affenito, SG, Bauserman, R et al. (2009) The relationship of ready-to-eat cereal consumption to nutrient intake, blood lipids, and body mass index of children as they age through adolescence. J Am Diet Assoc 109, 15571565.
8. Cho, S, Dietrich, M, Brown, CJ et al. (2003) The effect of breakfast type on total daily energy intake and body mass index: results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III). J Am Coll Nutr 22, 296302.
9. Rosado, JL, del, RA, Montemayor, K et al. (2008) An increase of cereal intake as an approach to weight reduction in children is effective only when accompanied by nutrition education: a randomized controlled trial. Nutr J 7, 28.
10. Harris, JL, Schwartz, MB, Brownell, KD et al. (2009) Cereal FACTS: Evaluating the Nutrition Quality and Marketing of Children's Cereals. New Haven, CT: Rudd Center for Food Policy & Obesity, Yale University; available at http://www.cerealfacts.org/media/Cereal_FACTS_Report.pdf
11. Schwartz, MB, Vartanian, LR, Wharton, CM et al. (2008) Examining the nutritional quality of breakfast cereals marketed to children. J Am Diet Assoc 108, 702705.
12. Schwartz, MB, Ross, C, Harris, JL et al. (2010) Breakfast cereal industry pledges to self-regulate advertising to youth: will they improve the marketing landscape? J Public Health Policy 31, 5973.
13. Powell, LM, Szczypka, G & Chaloupka, FJ (2010) Trends in exposure to television food advertisements among children and adolescents in the United States. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 164, 794802.
14. World Health Organization (2006) Marketing of Food and Non-alcoholic Beverages to Children. Report of a WHO Forum and Technical Meeting, Oslo, Norway, 2–5 May 2006. Geneva: WHO; available at http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/publications/Oslo%20meeting%20layout%2027%20NOVEMBER.pdf
15. Larson, NI, Story, MT & Nelson, MC (2009) Neighborhood environments: disparities in access to healthy foods in the US. Am J Prev Med 36, 7481.
16. Slimani, N, Deharveng, G, Unwin, I et al. (2007) The EPIC nutrient database project (ENDB): a first attempt to standardize nutrient databases across the 10 European countries participating in the EPIC study. Eur J Clin Nutr 61, 10371056.
17. Einav, L, Leibtag, E & Nevo, A (2008) On the Accuracy of Nielsen Homescan Data. Economic Research Report no. 69. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service; available at http://www.ers.usda.gov/Publications/ERR69/ERR69.pdf
18. Rayner M, Scarborough P, Lobstein T (2009) The UK Ofcom Nutrient Profiling Model. http://www.dphpc.ox.ac.uk/bhfhprg/publicationsandreports/publications/bhfhprgpublished/nutrientprofilemodel (accessed January 2011).
19. Arambepola, C, Scarborough, P & Rayner, M (2008) Validating a nutrient profile model. Public Health Nutr 11, 371378.
20. Scarborough, P, Arambepola, C, Kaur, A et al. (2010) Should nutrient profile models be ‘category specific’ or ‘across-the-board’? A comparison of the two systems using diets of British adults. Eur J Clin Nutr 64, 553560.
21. Ricciuto, L, Tarasuk, V & Yatchew, A (2006) Socio-demographic influences on food purchasing among Canadian households. Eur J Clin Nutr 60, 778790.
22. Siega-Riz, AM, Popkin, BM & Carson, T (2000) Differences in food patterns at breakfast by sociodemographic characteristics among a nationally representative sample of adults in the United States. Prev Med 30, 415424.
23. Story, M & French, S (2004) Food advertising and marketing directed at children and sdolescents in the US. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 1, 3.
24. Hawkes, C (2009) Sales promotions and food consumption. Nutr Rev 67, 333342.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Public Health Nutrition
  • ISSN: 1368-9800
  • EISSN: 1475-2727
  • URL: /core/journals/public-health-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed