Book contents
- The Law of International Lawyers
- The Law of International Lawyers
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 What Moves Law?
- 2 Formalism, Realism and the Politics of Indeterminacy
- 3 Settling Disputes
- 4 Form Meets Function
- 5 Martti Koskenniemi on Human Rights
- 6 The Rule of Law in an Agnostic World
- 7 The Space between Us
- 8 The Critic(-al Subject)
- 9 Practising Law
- 10 Thinking about What International Humanitarian Lawyers ‘Do’
- 11 International Law and the Limits of History
- 12 Even the Dead Will Not Be Safe
- 13 Martti Koskenniemi and the Historiography of International Law in the Age of the War on Terror
- 14 Martti Koskenniemi's Critique of Eurocentrism in International Law
- Epilogue
- Index
- References
10 - Thinking about What International Humanitarian Lawyers ‘Do’
An Examination of the Laws of War as a Field of Professional Practice
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 May 2017
Book contents
- The Law of International Lawyers
- The Law of International Lawyers
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 What Moves Law?
- 2 Formalism, Realism and the Politics of Indeterminacy
- 3 Settling Disputes
- 4 Form Meets Function
- 5 Martti Koskenniemi on Human Rights
- 6 The Rule of Law in an Agnostic World
- 7 The Space between Us
- 8 The Critic(-al Subject)
- 9 Practising Law
- 10 Thinking about What International Humanitarian Lawyers ‘Do’
- 11 International Law and the Limits of History
- 12 Even the Dead Will Not Be Safe
- 13 Martti Koskenniemi and the Historiography of International Law in the Age of the War on Terror
- 14 Martti Koskenniemi's Critique of Eurocentrism in International Law
- Epilogue
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Law of International LawyersReading Martti Koskenniemi, pp. 265 - 296Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Adler, Emanuel, and Pouliot, Vincent. ‘International Practices’. International Theory 3 (2011): 1–36.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. ‘The Force of Law: toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field’. Hastings Law Journal 38 (1986): 805–53.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. ‘Habitus, code et codification’. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 64 (1986): 40–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. ‘La Force Du Droit [Eléments Pour Une Sociologie Du Champ Juridique]’, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 64 (1986): 3–19.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. La Noblesse D’état: Grandes Écoles Et Esprit De Corps (Paris: Minuit, 1989).Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. ‘Les Juristes, Gardiens De L'hypocrisie Collective’. In Chazel, François and Comaille, Jacques (eds), Normes Juridiques Et Régulation Sociales (Paris: Librairie Générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence, 1991).Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. Les Règles De L'art: Genèse Et Structure Du Champ Littéraire (Paris: Seuil, 1992).Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. Sur L’état: Cours Au Collège De France (1989–1992)¸ Champagne, Patrick, Lenoir, Remi, Poupeau, Franck and Rivière, Marie-Christine (eds) (Paris: Seuil, 2012).Google Scholar
Cassese, Antonio. ‘The Martens Clause: Half a Loaf or Simply Pie in the Sky?’ European Journal of International Law 11 (2000): 187–216.Google Scholar
d'Aspremont, Jean. ‘Send Back the Lifeboats: Confronting the Project of Saving International Law’. American Journal of International Law 108 (2014): 680–89.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Garth, Bryant G.. Dealing in Virtue: International Commercial Arbitration and the Construction of a Transnational Legal Order (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Garth, Bryant G.. ‘From the Cold War to Kosovo: the Rise and Renewal of the Field of International Human Rights’. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 2 (2006): 231–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Madsen, Mikael Rask. ‘The Force of Law and Lawyers: Pierre Bourdieu and the Reflexive Sociology of Law’. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 8 (2012): 433–52.Google Scholar
Goodman, Ryan. ‘The Power to Kill or Capture Enemy Combatants’. European Journal of International Law 24 (2013): 819–53.Google Scholar
Hansen, Michelle A. ‘Preventing the Emasculation of Warfare: Halting the Expansion of Human Rights Law into Armed Conflict’. Military Law Review 194 (2007): 1–65.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Tamás. ‘The Gentle Humanizer of Humanitarian Law: Antonio Cassese and the Creation of the Customary Law of Non-International Armed Conflicts’. In Carsten, Stahn and van den Herik, Larissa J. (eds), Future Perspectives on International Criminal Justice (The Hague: TMC Asser Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Klabbers, Jan. ‘Towards a Culture of Formalism; Martti Koskenniemi and the Virtues’. Temple International and Comparative Law Journal 27 (2013): 417–35.Google Scholar
Korhonen, Outi. ‘New International Law: Silence, Defence or Deliverance’. European Journal of International Law 7 (1996): 1–28.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti. ‘Between Commitment and Cynicism: Outline for a Theory of International Law as Practice’. In The Politics of International Law (Oxford: Hart, 2011).Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti. From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument, reissue with a new epilogue (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti. The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: the Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti. ‘Occupied Zone – “a Zone of Reasonableness”?’ Israel Law Review 41 (2008): 13–40.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti. ‘The Pull of the Mainstream’. Michigan Law Review 88 (1990): 1946–62.Google Scholar
Martinez, Jenny, and Bouvier, Antoine. ‘Assessing the Relationship between Jus in Bello and Jus Ad Bellum: an “Orthodox” View’. Annual Proceedings of the American Society of International Law 100 (2006): 109–12.Google Scholar
Mégret, Frédéric. ‘International Criminal Justice – a Critical Research Agenda’. In Schwöbel, Christine (ed.), Critical Approaches to International Criminal Law: an Introduction (Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2014).Google Scholar
Mégret, Frédéric. ‘Missions Autorisees Par Le Conseil De Securite a L'heure De La R2p: Au-Dela Du Jus in Bello’. The Military Law and the Law of War Review 52 (2013): 205–40.Google Scholar
Mégret, Frédéric. ‘Three Dangers for the International Criminal Court: a Critical Look at a Consensual Project’. Finnish Yearbook of International Law 12 (2002): 195–247.Google Scholar
Mégret, Frédéric. ‘What Is the Specific Evil of Aggression?’ In Kreß, Claus and Barriga, Stefan (eds), The Crime of Aggression – a Commentary (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming).Google Scholar
Meierhenrich, Jens. ‘The Practice of International Law: a Theoretical Analysis’. Law and Contemporary Problems 76 (2013): 1–83.Google Scholar
Melzer, Nils. ‘Keeping the Balance between Military Necessity and Humanity: a Response to Four Critiques of the ICRC's Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities’. NYU Journal of International Law and Politics 42 (2009): 831–916.Google Scholar
Meron, Theodor. ‘The Humanization of Humanitarian Law’. American Journal of International Law 94 (2000): 239–78.Google Scholar
Meron, Theodor. ‘The Martens Clause, Principles of Humanity, and Dictates of Public Conscience’. American Journal of International Law 94 (2000): 78–89.Google Scholar
Mertus, Julie. ‘The Danger of Conflating Jus ad Bellum and Jus in Bello’. Annual Proceedings of the American Society of International Law 100 (2006): 114–17.Google Scholar
Moussa, Jasmine. ‘Can Jus ad Bellum Override Jus in Bello? Reaffirming the Separation of the Two Bodies of Law’. International Review of the Red Cross 90 (2008): 963–90.Google Scholar
Orford, Anne. ‘Embodying Internationalism: the Making of International Lawyers’. Australian Yearbook of International Law 19 (1998): 1–34.Google Scholar
Pilloud, Claude, Sandoz, Yves, Swinarski, Christophe and Zimmermann, Bruno. Commentary on the Additional Protocols: of 8 June 1977 to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 (Geneva: Martinus Nijhoff, 1987).Google Scholar
Prost, Mario. ‘All Shouting the Same Slogans: International Law's Unities and the Politics of Fragmentation’. Finnish Yearbook of International Law 17 (2006): 131.Google Scholar
Rajkovic, Nikolas M. ‘Rules, Lawyering, and the Politics of Legality: Critical Sociology and International Law's Rule’. Leiden Journal of International Law 27 (2014): 331–52.Google Scholar
Roberts, Adam. ‘The Principle of Equal Application of the Laws of War’. In Rodin, David and Shue, Henry (eds), Just and Unjust Warriors: the Moral and Legal Status of Soldiers (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Sacriste, Guillaume, and Vauchez, Antoine. ‘Les “Bons Offices” Du Droit International: La Constitution D'une Autorité Non Politique Dans Le Concert Diplomatique Des Années 1920’. Critique Internationale 1 (2005): 101–17.Google Scholar
Schachter, Oscar. ‘Invisible College of International Lawyers’. Northwestern University Law Review 72 (1977): 217–26.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Michael N. ‘Wound, Capture, or Kill: a Reply to Ryan Goodman's “the Power to Kill or Capture Enemy Combatants”’, European Journal of International Law 24 (2013): 855–61.Google Scholar
Sloane, Robert D. ‘The Cost of Conflation: Preserving the Dualism of Jus ad Bellum and Jus in Bello in the Contemporary Law of War’. Yale Journal of International Law 34 (2009): 47–112.Google Scholar
Terdiman, Richard. ‘Translator's Introduction to Pierre Bourdieu, the Force of Law: toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field’. Hastings Law Journal 38 (1987): 805–13.Google Scholar
Vauchez, Antoine. ‘The Force of a Weak Field: Law and Lawyers in the Government of the European Union (for a Renewed Research Agenda)’. International Political Sociology 2 (2008): 128–44.Google Scholar
- 3
- Cited by