Book contents
- The Law of International Lawyers
- The Law of International Lawyers
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 What Moves Law?
- 2 Formalism, Realism and the Politics of Indeterminacy
- 3 Settling Disputes
- 4 Form Meets Function
- 5 Martti Koskenniemi on Human Rights
- 6 The Rule of Law in an Agnostic World
- 7 The Space between Us
- 8 The Critic(-al Subject)
- 9 Practising Law
- 10 Thinking about What International Humanitarian Lawyers ‘Do’
- 11 International Law and the Limits of History
- 12 Even the Dead Will Not Be Safe
- 13 Martti Koskenniemi and the Historiography of International Law in the Age of the War on Terror
- 14 Martti Koskenniemi's Critique of Eurocentrism in International Law
- Epilogue
- Index
- References
6 - The Rule of Law in an Agnostic World
The Prohibition on the Use of Force and Humanitarian Exceptions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 May 2017
Book contents
- The Law of International Lawyers
- The Law of International Lawyers
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 What Moves Law?
- 2 Formalism, Realism and the Politics of Indeterminacy
- 3 Settling Disputes
- 4 Form Meets Function
- 5 Martti Koskenniemi on Human Rights
- 6 The Rule of Law in an Agnostic World
- 7 The Space between Us
- 8 The Critic(-al Subject)
- 9 Practising Law
- 10 Thinking about What International Humanitarian Lawyers ‘Do’
- 11 International Law and the Limits of History
- 12 Even the Dead Will Not Be Safe
- 13 Martti Koskenniemi and the Historiography of International Law in the Age of the War on Terror
- 14 Martti Koskenniemi's Critique of Eurocentrism in International Law
- Epilogue
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Law of International LawyersReading Martti Koskenniemi, pp. 137 - 166Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Adler, Emanuel, and Bernstein, Steven. ‘Knowledge in Power: The Epistemic Construction of Global Governance’. In Barnett, Michael N and Duvall, Raymond (eds), Power in Global Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Akande, Dapo. ‘The Legality of Military Action in Syria: Humanitarian Intervention and the Responsibility to Protect’. EJIL: Talk!, 28 August 2013.Google Scholar
Bellamy, Alex J. ‘Libya and the Responsibility to Protect: the Exception and the Norm’. Ethics & International Affairs 25 (2011): 263–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bethlehem, Daniel. ‘Stepping Back a Moment – the Legal Basis in Favour of a Principle of Humanitarian Intervention’. EJIL: Talk!, 12 September 2013.Google Scholar
Blätter, Ariela, and Williams, Paul D. ‘The Responsibility Not to Veto’. Global Responsibility to Protect 3 (2011): 301–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunnée, Jutta. ‘International Legal Accountability through the Lens of the Law of State Responsibility’. Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 36 (2005): 21–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunnée, Jutta, and Toope, Stephen J. ‘Interactional International Law: an Introduction’. International Theory 3 (2011): 307–18.Google Scholar
Brunnée, Jutta, and Toope, Stephen J. Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Brunnée, Jutta, and Toope, Stephen J. ‘The Responsibility to Protect and the Use of Force: Building Legality?’ Global Responsibility to Protect 2 (2010): 191–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
d'Aspremont, Jean. ‘The Politics of Deformalization in International Law’. Goettingen Journal of International Law 3 (2011): 503–50.Google Scholar
Dunoff, Jeffrey L. ‘From Interdisciplinarity to Counterdisciplinarity: Is There Madness in Martti's Method’. Temple International and Comparative Law Journal 27 (2013): 309–37.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. ‘Hobbes on the International Rule of Law’. Ethics & International Affairs 28 (2014): 53–64.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L. ‘Human Interaction and the Law’. The American Journal of Jurisprudence 14 (1969): 1–36.Google Scholar
Gearan, Anne, and Wilson, Scott. ‘U.S., Russia Reach Agreement on Seizure of Syrian Chemical Weapons Arsenal’. Washington Post, 14 September 2013.Google Scholar
Independent International Commission on Kosovo. The Kosovo Report: Conflict, International Response, Lessons Learned (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. The Responsibility to Protect (Ottawa, ON: International Development Research Centre, 2001).Google Scholar
Kaye, David. ‘Harold Koh's Case for Humanitarian Intervention’. Just Security, 7 October 2013.Google Scholar
Koh, Harold H. ‘Syria and the Law of Humanitarian Intervention (Part II: International Law and the Way Forward)’. Just Security, 2 October 2013.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti. ‘Constitutionalism as Mindset: Reflections on Kantian Themes about International Law and Globalization’. Theoretical Inquiries in Law 8 (2007): 9–36.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti. From Apology to Utopia: the Structure of International Legal Argument, reissue with a new epilogue (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti. ‘Human Rights, Politics, and Love’. Finnish Yearbook of International Law 13 (2004): 79–94.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti. ‘“The Lady Doth Protest Too Much”: Kosovo, and the Turn to Ethics in International Law’. Modern Law Review 65 (2002): 159–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti. ‘Law, Teleology and International Relations: an Essay in Counterdisciplinarity’. International Relations 26 (2012): 3–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti. ‘The Mystery of Legal Obligation’. International Theory 3 (2011): 319–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti. ‘The Police in the Temple Order, Justice and the UN: a Dialectical View’. European Journal of International Law 6 (1995): 325–48.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti. ‘The Politics of International Law – 20 Years Later’. European Journal of International Law 20 (2009): 7–19.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti. ‘What Is International Law For?’ In The Politics of International Law (Oxford: Hart, 2011).Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti. ‘What Should International Lawyers Learn from Karl Marx?’ Leiden Journal of International Law 17 (2004): 229–46.Google Scholar
Morris, Justin. ‘Libya and Syria: R2p and the Spectre of the Swinging Pendulum’. International Affairs 89 (2013): 1265–83.Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, André. ‘Intervention in Syria and International Law: Inside or Out?’ Opinio Juris, 1 September 2013.Google Scholar
Quinton-Brown, Patrick. ‘Mapping Dissent: the Responsibility to Protect and Its State Critics’. Global Responsibility to Protect 5 (2013): 260–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharf, Michael P. Customary International Law in Times of Fundamental Change: Recognizing Grotian Moments (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Smith, Ben, Miller, Vaughne and Lang, Arabella. ‘Military Interventions: Some Comparisons’. UK House of Commons Library Standard Note SNIA 6715, 29 August 2013.Google Scholar
Strauss, Ekkehard. ‘A Bird in the Hand Is Worth Two in the Bush – on the Assumed Legal Nature of the Responsibility to Protect’. Global Responsibility to Protect 1 (2009): 291–323.Google Scholar
Welsh, Jennifer M. ‘Norm Contestation and the Responsibility to Protect’. Global Responsibility to Protect 5 (2013): 365–96.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Winston, Kenneth I. (ed.). The Principles of Social Order: Selected Essays of Lon L. Fuller (Oxford: Hart, 2001).Google Scholar