Abbott, Andrew. The System of Professions: an Essay on the Division of Expert Labor (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988).Google Scholar

Abbott, Andrew. ‘Things of Boundaries’. Social Research 62 (1995): 857–82.Google Scholar

Abbott, Kenneth W. ‘Modern International Relations Theory: a Prospectus for International Lawyers’. Yale Journal of International Law 14 (1989): 335–411.Google Scholar

Abbott, Kenneth W., and Snidal, Duncan. ‘Law, Legalization, and Politics: an Agenda for the Next Generation of IL/IR Scholars’. In Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A (eds), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: the State of the Art (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Abbott, Kenneth W., Keohane, Robert O., Moravcsik, Andrew, Slaughter, Anne-Marie and Snidal, Duncan, ‘The Concept of Legalization’, International Organization 54 (2000): 401–19.Google Scholar

Agnew, John. ‘The Territorial Trap: the Geographical Assumptions of International Relations Theory’. Review of International Political Economy 1 (1994): 53–80.Google Scholar

Allott, Philip. ‘Review of Books’. British Yearbook of International Law 80 (2010): 409–22.Google Scholar

Amariglio, Jack, Resnick, Stephen and Wolff, Richard. ‘Division and Difference in the “Discipline” of Economics’. In Messer-Davidow, Ellen, Shumway, David R and Sylvan, David J (eds), Knowledges: Historical and Critical Studies in Disciplinarity (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1993).Google Scholar

Anghie, Antony. Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Apostel, Leo. Interdisciplinarity Problems of Teaching and Research in Universities (Paris: OECD, 1972).Google Scholar

Aristophanes. Clouds; Wasps; Peace, Henderson, Jeffrey (ed. and trans.) (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics, Crisp, Roger (ed. and trans.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Bartelson, Jens. A Genealogy of Sovereignty (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Bateson, Gregory. Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology (San Francisco: Chandler, 1972).Google Scholar

Crawford, James. ‘International Law as Discipline and Profession’. Proceedings of the American Society of International Law 106 (2012): 471–86.Google Scholar

Della Porta, Donatella, and Keating, Michael. Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: a Pluralist Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. ‘Docile Bodies’. In Rabinow, Paul (ed.), The Foucault Reader (New York: Pantheon Books, 1984).Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. The Order of Things: an Archaeology of the Human Sciences (New York: Vintage, 1994).Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. Power: the Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, vol. 3, Faubion, James D (ed.), Hurley, Robert (trans.) (New York: New Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Frodeman, Robert. Sustainable Knowledge: a Theory of Interdisciplinarity (Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014).Google Scholar

Fuller, Steve. ‘Disciplinary Boundaries and the Rhetoric of the Social Sciences’. In Messer-Davidow, Ellen, Shumway, David R and Sylvan, David J (eds), Knowledges: Historical and Critical Studies in Disciplinarity (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1993).Google Scholar

Gibbons, Michael, Limoges, Camille, Nowotny, Helga, Schwartzman, Simon, Scott, Peter and Trow, Martin. The New Production of Knowledge: the Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994).Google Scholar

Goldsmith, Jack L., and Posner, Eric A. The Limits of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gregory, Derek. Geographical Imaginations (Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1994).Google Scholar

Haas, Peter M. ‘Epistemic Communities and the Dynamics of International Environmental Cooperation’. In Rittberger, Volker and Mayer, Peter (eds), Regime Theory and International Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Harley, John B. ‘Deconstructing the Map’. Cartographica 26 (1989): 1–20.Google Scholar

Harley, John B. ‘Historical Geography and the Cartographic Illusion’. Journal of Historical Geography 15 (1989): 80–91.Google Scholar

Harley, John B., and Woodward, David. History of Cartography, vol. 1 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987).Google Scholar

Havercroft, Jonathan. Captives of Sovereignty (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hobson, John M. ‘What's at Stake in “Bringing Historical Sociology Back into International Relations?” Transcending “Chronofetishism” and “Tempocentrism” in International Relations’. In Hobden, Stephen and Hobson, John M (eds), Historical Sociology of International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason, Guyer, Paul and Wood, Allen W (eds. and trans.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert O. ‘International Relations and International Law: Two Optics’. Harvard International Law Journal 38 (1997): 487–502.Google Scholar

Kessler, Oliver. ‘So Close yet So Far Away? International Law in International Political Sociology’. International Political Sociology 4 (2010): 303–4.Google Scholar

King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O and Verba, Sidney. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan. ‘The Bridge Crack'd: a Critical Look at Interdisciplinary Relations’. International Relations 23 (2009): 119–25.Google Scholar

Koremenos, Barbara, Lipson, Charles and Snidal, Duncan. ‘The Rational Design of International Institutions’. International Organization 55 (2001): 761–99.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti. ‘Empire and International Law: the Real Spanish Contribution’. University of Toronto Law Journal 61 (2011): 1–36.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti. From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument, reissue with a new epilogue (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti. The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti. ‘Miserable Comforters: International Relations as New Natural Law’. European Journal of International Relations 15 (2009): 395–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti. ‘Law, Teleology and International Relations: an Essay in Counterdisciplinarity’. International Relations 26 (2012): 3–34.Google Scholar

Koslowski, Rey, and Kratochwil, Friedrich V. ‘Understanding Change in International Politics: the Soviet Empire's Demise and the International System’. International Organization 48 (1994): 215–47.Google Scholar

Kratochwil, Friedrich V. Rules, Norms, and Decisions: on the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Lamont, Michèle. How Professors Think inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Latour, Bruno. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987).Google Scholar

Lefebvre, Henri. The Production of Space, Nicholson-Smith, Donald (trans.) (Oxford: Blackwell, 1991).Google Scholar

Lefebvre, Henri. ‘Space: Social Product and Use Value’. In Brenner, Neil and Elden, Stuart (eds), State, Space, World: Selected Essays on Henry Lefebvre (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Legro, Jeffrey W., and Moravcsik, Andrew. ‘Is Anybody Still a Realist?’ International Security 24 (1999): 5–55.Google Scholar

Lindahl, Hans. Fault Lines of Globalization: Legal Order and the Politics of A-Legality (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Malpas, Jeff, and Thiel, Karsten. ‘Reading Kant's Geography’. In Elden, Stuart and Mendieta, Eduardo (eds), Reading Kant's Geography (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Marks, Susan. ‘Human Rights in Disastrous Times’. In Crawford, James and Koskenniemi, Martti (eds), The Cambridge Companion to International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Mitchell, Timothy. Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Mitchell, Timothy. ‘Society, Economy, and the State Effect’. In Sharma, Aradhana and Gupta, Akhil (eds), The Anthropology of the State: a Reader (Oxford: Blackwell, 2006).Google Scholar

Moran, Joe. Interdisciplinarity (London: Routledge, 2002).Google Scholar

National Research Council. Physics through the 1990s: Scientific Interfaces and Technological Applications (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Onuf, Nicholas G. World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Onuf, Nicholas G. ‘Worlds of Our Making’. In Making Sense, Making Worlds: Constructivism in Social Theory and International Relations (London: Routledge, 2012).Google Scholar

Pollack, Mark A. ‘Is International Relations Corrosive of International Law? A Reply to Martti Koskenniemi’. Temple International and Comparative Law Journal 27 (2013): 339–75.Google Scholar

Said, Edward W. Humanism and Democratic Criticism (New York: Columbia University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Said, Edward W. Orientalism (New York: Vintage, 2003).Google Scholar

Said, Edward W. ‘The Scope of Orientalism’. In Bayoumi, Moustafa and Rubin, Andrew (eds), The Edward Said Reader (New York: Vintage, 2000).Google Scholar

Samiei, Mohammad. ‘Neo-Orientalism? The Relationship between the West and Islam in Our Globalised World’. Third World Quarterly 31 (2010): 1145–60.Google Scholar

Seligman, Linda J. ‘Ethnographic Method’. In Druckman, Daniel (ed.), Doing Research: Methods of Inquiry for Conflict Analysis (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2005).Google Scholar

Shaffer, Gregory, and Ginsburg, Tom. ‘The Empirical Turn in International Legal Scholarship’. American Journal of International Law 106 (2012): 1–46.Google Scholar

Singh, Sahib. ‘Identifying Threats to the Identity of International Law’. Paper presented at the 5th Research Forum of the European Society of International law, May 2013.Google Scholar

Slaughter, Anne-Marie. ‘International Law and International Relations Theory: Twenty Years Later’. In Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A (eds), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: the State of the Art (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Slaughter, Anne-Marie. ‘International Law in a World of Liberal States’. European Journal of International Law 6 (1995): 503–38.Google Scholar

Slaughter Burley, Anne-Marie. ‘International Law and International Relations Theory: a Dual Agenda’. American Journal of International Law 87 (1993): 205–39.Google Scholar

Stichweh, Rudolf. Zur Entstehung Des Modernen Systems Wissenschaftlicher Disziplinen: Physik in Deutschland, 1740–1890 (Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp, 1984).Google Scholar

Thompson Klein, Julie. ‘Blurring, Cracking, and Crossing: Permeation and the Fracturing of Discipline’. In Messer-Davidow, Ellen, Shumway, David R and Sylvan, David J (eds), Knowledges: Historical and Critical Studies in Disciplinarity (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1993).Google Scholar

Thompson Klein, Julie. Crossing Boundaries: Knowledge, Disciplinarities, and Interdisciplinarities (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1996).Google Scholar

Thompson Klein, Julie. Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory, and Practice (Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Turner, Stephen. ‘What Are Disciplines? And How Is Interdisciplinarity Different’. In Steher, Nico and Weingart, Peter (eds), Practising Interdisciplinarity (Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Vigneswaran, Darshan, and Quirk, Joel. ‘Past Masters and Modern Inventions: Intellectual History as Critical Theory’. International Relations 24 (2010): 107–31.Google Scholar

Weingart, Peter. ‘A Short History of Knowledge Formations’. In Frodeman, Robert, Klein, Julie Thompson and Mitcham, Carl (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar