Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T00:06:37.971Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 15 - Fetal Cardiac Abnormalities (Content last reviewed: 15th March 2020)

from Section 3 - Late Prenatal – Fetal Problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 November 2017

David James
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
Philip Steer
Affiliation:
Imperial College London
Carl Weiner
Affiliation:
University of Kansas
Bernard Gonik
Affiliation:
Wayne State University, Detroit
Stephen Robson
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle
Get access

Summary

The prenatal detection of congenital heart disease or defects (CHD) has improved over the years, though it remains below 50%. Major defects are more readily detectable (57%) than isolated lesions (44%). Given that CHD accounts for nearly one-third of all congenital anomalies, its implications on the neonatal outcome and its financial burden are significant. The incidence of CHD is influenced by the definition of the disease, the associated anomalies, and the timing of diagnosis.

Type
Chapter
Information
High-Risk Pregnancy
Management Options
, pp. 340 - 363
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
First published in: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Tegnander, E, Williams, W, Johanses, OJ, et al. prenatal detection of heart defect in a non-selected population of 30,149 fetuses: detection rates and outcomes. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 252–65.Google Scholar
Hoffman, JIE, Christianson, R. Congenital heart disease in a cohort of 19,502 births with long-term follow up. Am J Cardiol 1978; 42: 641–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodrow, BD. The genetics of congenital heart disease: a point of revolution. Cardiol Clin 2002; 20: 385–94.Google Scholar
International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carvalho, JS, Allan, LD, Chaoui, R, et al. ISUOG practice guidelines (updated): sonographic screening examination of the fetal heart. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41: 348–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. AIUM practice guideline for the performance of obstetric ultrasound examinations. J Ultrasound Med 2013; 32: 1083–101.Google Scholar
Van der Linde, D, Konings, EE, Slager, MA, et al. Birth prevalence of congenital heart disease worldwide: a systematic review and metaanalysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58: 2241–7.Google Scholar
Allan, LD. Echocardiographic detection of congenital heart disease in the fetus: present and future. Br Heart J 1995; 74: 103–6.Google Scholar
American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. AIUM practice guideline for the performance of fetal echocardiography. J Ultrasound Med 2013: 32: 1067–82.Google Scholar
Rowland, TW, Hubbell, JP, Nadas, AS. Congenital heart disease in infants of diabetic mothers. J Pediatr 1973; 83: 815–20.Google Scholar
Cedegren, MI, Kallen, AJ. Maternal obesity and infant heart defects. Obes Res 2003; 11: 1065–71.Google Scholar
Shields, LE, Gan, EA, Murphy, HF, Sahn, DJ, Moore, TR. The prognostic value of hemoglobin A1c in predicting fetal heart disease in diabetic pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 81: 954–7.Google Scholar
Levy, HL, Waisbren, SE. Effects of untreated maternal phenylketonuria and hyperphenylalaninemia on the fetus. N Engl J Med 1983; 309: 1269–74.Google Scholar
Lenke, RL, Levy, HL. Maternal phenylketonuria and hyperphenylalaninemia: an international survey of the outcome of untreated and treated pregnancies. N Engl J Med 1980; 303: 1202–8.Google Scholar
Jones, KI, Smith, DW, Ulleland, CN, Streissguth, P. Pattern of malformation in offspring of alcoholic mothers. Lancet 1973; 1: 1267–71.Google ScholarPubMed
Koivurova, S, Hartikainen, AL, Gissler, M, et al. Neonatal outcome and congenital malformations in children born after in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 2002; 5: 1391–8.Google Scholar
Kurinczuk, JJ, Bower, C. Birth defects in infants conceived by intracytoplasmic sperm injection: an alternative interpretation. Br Med J 1997; 315: 1260–6.Google Scholar
Copel, JA, Pilu, G, Kleinman, CS. Congenital heart disease and extracardiac anomalies: association and indications for fetal echocardiography. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 154: 1121–32.Google Scholar
Bahado-Singh, RO, Wapner, R, Thom, E, et al. Elevated first trimester nuchal translucency increases the risk of congenital heart defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192: 1357–61.Google Scholar
Manning, N, Archer, N. A study to determine the incidence of structural congenital heart disease in monochorionic twins. Prenat Diag 2006; 11: 1062–4.Google Scholar
Copel, JA, Cullen, M, Green, JJ, et al. The frequency of aneuploidy in prenatally diagnosed congenital heart disease: an indication for fetal karyotyping. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 158: 409–13.Google Scholar
Ferencz, C, Neill, CA, Boughman, JA, et al. Congenital cardiac malformation associated with chromosome abnormalities; an epidemiologic study. J Pediatr 1989; 114: 7986.Google Scholar
Hook, EB. Chromosome abnormalities and spontaneous fetal death following amniocentesis: further data and association with maternal age. Am J Hum Genet 1983; 35: 110–16.Google Scholar
Harris, JA, Francannet, C, Pradat, P, Robert, E. The epidemiology of cardiovascular defects, part 2: a study based on data from three large registries of congenital malformations. Pediatr Cardiol 2003; 24: 222–35.Google Scholar
Chaoui, R, Kalache, KD, Heling, KS, et al. Absent or hypoplastic thymus on ultrasound; a marker for deletion 22q11 in fetal cardiac defects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 20: 546–52.Google Scholar
Manning, N, Kaufman, L, Roberts, P. Genetics of cardiological disorders. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2005; 10: 259–69.Google Scholar
Menashe, M, Arbel, R, Raveh, D, Achiron, R, Yagel, S. Poor prenatal detection rate of cardiac anomalies in Noonan syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 19; 51–5.Google Scholar
Kratz, ID, Piccoli, DA, Spinner, NB. Alagille syndrome. J Med Genet 1997; 34: 152–7.Google Scholar
Basson, CT, Cowley, GS, Solomon, SD, et al. The clinical and genetic spectrum of the Holt–Oram syndrome: heart–hand syndrome. N Engl J Med 1994; 330: 885–91.Google Scholar
Souka, AP, Pilalis, A, Kavalakis, Y, et al. Assessment of fetal anatomy at the 11–14 week ultrasound examination. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 24: 730–4.Google Scholar
Hyett, J, Perdu, M, Sharland, G, Snijders, R, Nicolaides, KH. Using fetal nuchal translucency to screen for major congenital cardiac defects at 10–14 weeks of gestation: population based cohort study. BMJ 1999; 318: 81–5.Google Scholar
Schwarzler, P, Carvalho, JS, Senat, MV, et al. Screening for fetal aneuploidies and fetal cardiac abnormalities by nuchal translucency thickness measurement at 10–14 weeks of gestation as part of routine antenatal care in an unselected population. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 106: 1029–34.Google Scholar
Timmerman, E, Clur, SA, Pajkrt, E, Bilardo, CM. First-trimester measurement of the ductus venosus pulsatility index and the prediction of congenital heart defects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 36: 668–75.Google Scholar
Borrell, A, Grande, M, Bennasar, M, et al. First-trimester detection of major cardiac defects with the use of ductus venosus blood flow. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42: 51–7.Google Scholar
Pereira, S, Ganapathy, R, Syngelaki, A, Maiz, N, Nicolaides, KH. Contribution of fetal tricuspid regurgitation in first-trimester screening for major cardiac defects. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117: 1384–91.Google Scholar
Chelemen, T, Syngelaki, A, Maiz, N, Allan, L, Nicolaides, KH. Contribution of ductus venosus Doppler in first-trimester screening for major cardiac defects. Fetal Diagn Ther 2011; 29: 127–34.Google Scholar
Martínez, JM, Comas, M, Borrell, A, et al. Abnormal first-trimester ductus venosus blood flow: a marker of cardiac defects in fetuses with normal karyotype and nuchal translucency. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 35: 267–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salomon, LJ, Alfirevic, Z, Bilardo, CM, et al. ISUOG practice guidelines: performance of first-trimester fetal ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41: 102–13.Google Scholar
Sinkovskaya, E, Horton, S, Berkley, EM, et al. Defining the fetal cardiac axis between 11 + 0 and 14 + 6 weeks of gestation: experience with 100 consecutive pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 36: 676–81.Google Scholar
McBrien, A, Howley, L, Yamamoto, Y, et al. Changes in fetal cardiac axis between 8 and 15 weeks’ gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42: 653–8.Google Scholar
Sinkovskaya, ES, Chaoui, R, Karl, K, et al. Fetal cardiac axis and congenital heart defects in early gestation. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125: 453–60.Google Scholar
Taketazu, M, Lougheed, J, Yoo, SJ, et al. Spectrum of cardiovascular disease, accuracy of diagnosis, and outcome in fetal heterotaxy syndrome. Am J Cardiol 2006; 97: 720–4.Google Scholar
Shultz, SM, Pretorius, DH, Budorick, NE. Four chamber view of the fetal heart: demonstration related to menstrual age. J Ultrasound Med 1994; 13; 285–9.Google Scholar
Paladini, D, Chita, SK, Allan, LD. Prenatal measurement of cardiothoracic ration in evaluation of heart disease. Arch Dis Child 1990; 65: 20–3.Google Scholar
Tongsong, T, Tatiyapornkul, T. Cardiothoracic ratio in the first half of pregnancy. J Clin Ultrasound 2004; 32: 186–9.Google Scholar
Chaoui, R, Bollmann, R, Göldner, B, Heling, KS, Tennstedt, C. Fetal cardiomegaly: echocardiographic findings and outcome in 19 cases. Fetal Diag Ther 1994; 9: 92104.Google Scholar
Donofrio, MT, Moon-Grady, AJ, Hornberger, LK et al. Diagnosis and treatment of fetal cardiac disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2014; 129: 2183–242. [Erratum in Circulation 2014; 129: e512].Google Scholar
Ferencz, C, Rubin, JD, Loffredo, CA, Magee, CM. Epidemiology of Congenital Heart Disease: the Baltimore–Washington Infant Study 1981–1989. Austin, TX: Futura Publishing, 1993, p. 38.Google Scholar
Fyler, DC, Buckley, LP, Hellenbrand, WE, et al. Endocardial cushion defect. Report of the New England Regional infant cardiac program. J Pediatr 1980; 65: 441–4.Google Scholar
Samanek, M. Prevalence at birth, “natural” risk and survival with atrioventricular septal defect. Cardiol Young 1991; 1: 285–9.Google Scholar
Fyler, DC. Tetralogy of Fallot. In Nadas, AS, Fyler, DC (eds), Nadas’ Pediatric Cardiology, 4th edn. Philadelphia, PA: Hanley & Belfus, 1992, pp. 471–91.Google Scholar
Poon, LCY, Huggon, IC, Zidere, V, et al. Tetralogy of Fallot in the fetus in the current era. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 29: 625–7.Google Scholar
Volpe, P, Paladini, D, Marasini, M, et al. Common arterial trunk in the fetus: characteristics, associations, and outcome in a multicentre series of 23 cases. Heart 2003; 89: 1437–41.Google Scholar
Webb, GD, McLaughlin, PR, Gow, RM, et al. Transposition complexes. Cardiol Clin 1993; 11: 651–64.Google Scholar
Allan, LD, Crawford, DC, Anderson, RH, et al. The spectrum of congenital heart disease detected echocardiographically in prenatal life. Br Heart J 1985; 54: 523–6.Google Scholar
Kirklin, JW, Barratt-Boyes, BG. Complete transposition of the great arteries. In Kirklin, JW, Barratt-Boyes, BG (eds), Cardiac Surgery. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone, 1993, pp. 1383–467.Google Scholar
Jex, RK, Puga, FJ, Julsrud, PR, et al. Repair of transposition of the great arteries with intact ventricular septum and left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990; 100: 682–6.Google Scholar
Sharland, G, Tingay, R, Jones, A, et al. Atrioventricular and ventriculoarterial discordance (congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries): echocardiographic features, associations, and outcome in 34 fetuses. Heart 2005; 91: 1453–8.Google Scholar
Paladini, D, Volpe, P, Marasini, M, et al. Diagnosis, characterization and outcome of congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries in the fetus: a multicenter series of 30 cases. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 281–5.Google Scholar
Allan, LD, Sharland, GK, Milburn, A, et al. Prospective diagnosis of 1,006 consecutive cases of congenital heart disease in the fetus. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 23: 1452–8.Google Scholar
Raymond, FL, Simpson, JM, Sharland, GK, Ogilvie Mackie, CM. Fetal echocardiography as a predictor of chromosomal abnormality. Lancet 1997; 360: 930.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×