Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T09:47:00.767Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 19 - Fetal Skeletal Abnormalities

from Section 3 - Late Prenatal – Fetal Problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 November 2017

By
Lyn S. Chitty
Edited by
David James ,
Philip Steer ,
Carl Weiner ,
Bernard Gonik  and
Stephen Robson
David James
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
Philip Steer
Affiliation:
Imperial College London
Carl Weiner
Affiliation:
University of Kansas
Bernard Gonik
Affiliation:
Wayne State University, Detroit
Stephen Robson
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle
Get access

Summary

The sonographic detection of a fetus with skeletal abnormalities presents the clinician with challenging diagnostic dilemmas and management options, as there are around 400 known generalized skeletal dysplasias with an estimated prevalence of 2–7 in 10,000. Some can present with significant findings early in pregnancy, but some do not have obvious findings until the mid-trimester, when they may be detected on a routine fetal anomaly scan, and others present later. However, many do not present until later in postnatal life. In some instances, the lethality of the disorder is apparent and a discussion of pregnancy termination is appropriate, but the aim prenatally is to try and arrive at a definitive diagnosis in order to offer parents accurate information regarding prognosis. As this is frequently not possible, at a minimum we should aim to distinguish lethal from nonlethal, and provide some degree of differential diagnosis so that parents can make decisions regarding further pregnancy management. An aid to the prediction of lethality is the use of a femur length/abdominal circumference (FL/AC) ratio, which, if < 0.16, distinguishes lethal from nonlethal skeletal dysplasias.

Type
Chapter
Information
High-Risk Pregnancy
Management Options
 , pp. 471 - 499
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
First published in: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Further Reading

Chitty, LS, Altman, DG. Charts of fetal size: limb bones. BJOG 2002; 109: 919–29.Google Scholar
Chitty, LS, Campbell, S, Altman, DG. Measurement of the fetal mandible: feasibility and construction of a centile chart. Prenat Diagn 1993; 13: 749–56.Google Scholar
Chitty, LS, Mason, S, Barrett, AN, et al. Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of achondroplasia and thanatophoric dysplasia: next generation sequencing allows for a safer, more accurate and comprehensive approach. Prenat Diagn 2015; 35: 656–62.Google Scholar
Hall, CM. International nosology and classification of constitutional disorders of bone (2001). Am J Med Genet 2002; 113: 65–77.Google Scholar
Irving, M, Chitty, LS, Mansour, S, Hall, CM. Chondrodysplasia punctata: a clinical diagnostic and radiological review. Clin Dysmorphol 2008; 17: 229–41.Google Scholar
Khalil, A, Pajkrt, E, Chitty, LS. Early prenatal diagnosis of skeletal anomalies. Prenat Diagn 2011; 31: 115–24.Google Scholar
Nelson, DB, Dashe, JS, McIntire, DD, Twickler, DM. Fetal skeletal dysplasias: sonographic indices associated with adverse outcomes. J Ultrasound Med 2014; 33: 1085–90.Google Scholar
Orioli, IM, Castilla, EE, Barbosa-Netos, JG. The birth prevalence rates for the skeletal dysplasias. J Med Genet 1986; 23: 328–32.Google Scholar
Pajkrt, E, Cicero, S, Griffin, DR, van Maarle, MC, Chitty, LS. Fetal forearm anomalies: prenatal diagnosis, associations and management strategy. Prenat Diagn 2012; 32: 1084–93.Google Scholar

References

Orioli, IM, Castilla, EE, Barbosa-Netos, JG. The birth prevalence rates for the skeletal dysplasias. J Med Genet 1986; 23: 328–32.Google Scholar
Khalil, A, Pajkrt, E, Chitty, LS. Early prenatal diagnosis of skeletal anomalies. Prenat Diagn 2011; 31: 115–24.Google Scholar
Schramm, T, Gloning, KP, Minderer, S, et al. Prenatal sonographic diagnosis of skeletal dysplasias. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 34: 160–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chitty, LS, Griffin, DR, Meaney, C, et al. New aids for the non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of achondroplasia: dysmorphic features, charts of fetal size and molecular confirmation using cell free fetal DNA in maternal plasma. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 37: 283–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yeh, P, Saeed, F, Paramasivam, G, Wyatt-Ashmead, J, Kumar, S. Accuracy of prenatal diagnosis and prediction of lethality for fetal skeletal dysplasias. Prenat Diagn 2011; 31: 515–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, DB, Dashe, JS, McIntire, DD, Twickler, DM. Fetal skeletal dysplasias: sonographic indices associated with adverse outcomes. J Ultrasound Med 2014; 33: 1085–90.Google Scholar
Krakow, D, Rimoin, DL. The skeletal dysplasias. Genet Med 2010; 12: 327–41.Google Scholar
Drury, S, Williams, H, Trump, N, et al. Exome sequencing for prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with sonographic abnormalities. Prenat Diagn 2015; 35: 1010–17.Google Scholar
Chitty, LS, Mason, S, Barrett, AN, et al. Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of achondroplasia and thanatophoric dysplasia: next generation sequencing allows for a safer, more accurate and comprehensive approach. Prenat Diagn 2015; 35: 656–62.Google Scholar
Sebire, NJ, Weber, MA, Thayyil, S, et al. Minimally invasive perinatal autopsies using magnetic resonance imaging and endoscopic post-mortem examination (“keyhole autopsy”): feasibility and initial experience. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012; 25: 513–18.Google Scholar
Arthurs, OJ, Thayyil, S, Addison, S, et al.; Magnetic Resonance Imaging Autopsy Study (MaRIAS) Collaborative Group. Diagnostic accuracy of post-mortem MRI for musculo-skeletal abnormalities in fetuses and children. Prenat Diagn 2014; 34: 1254–61.Google Scholar
Brown, N, Lumley, J, Tickle, C, Keene, J. Congenital Limb Reduction Defects: Clues from Developmental Biology, Teratology and Epidemiology. London: HMSO, 1996.Google Scholar
Makrydimas, G, Souka, A, Skentou, H, et al. Osteogenesis imperfecta and other skeletal dysplasias presenting with increased nuchal translucency in the first trimester. Am J Med Genet 2001; 98: 117–20.Google Scholar
Weisz, B, David, AL, Chitty, L, et al. Association of isolated short femur in the mid-trimester fetus with perinatal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 31: 512–16.Google Scholar
Hyett, JA, Griffin, DR. Chitty, LS. Short femora. Achondroplasia or IUGR: use of growth patterns as an aid to diagnosis. J Obstet Gynaecol 2002; 22 (Suppl 1): S32.Google Scholar
Chitty, LS, Altman, DG. Charts of fetal measurements. In Rodeck, CH, Whittle, M (eds), Fetal Medicine: Basic Science and Clinical Practice. London: Churchill Livingstone, 2009, pp. 721–66.Google Scholar
Chitty, LS, Campbell, S, Altman, DG. Measurement of the fetal mandible: feasibility and construction of a centile chart. Prenat Diagn 1993; 13: 749–56.Google Scholar
Chitty, LS, Altman, DG, Henderson, A, Campbell, S. Charts of fetal size: 2. Head measurements. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994; 101: 35–43.Google Scholar
Chitty, LS, Altman, DG, Henderson, A, Campbell, S. Charts of fetal size: 3. Abdominal circumference. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994; 101: 132–5.Google Scholar
Chitty, LS, Altman, DG, Henderson, A, Campbell, S. Charts of fetal size: 4. Femur length. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994; 101: 125–31.Google Scholar
Chitty, LS, Altman, DG. Charts of fetal size: limb bones. BJOG 2002; 109: 919–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Irving, M, Chitty, LS, Mansour, S, Hall, CM. Chondrodysplasia punctata: a clinical diagnostic and radiological review. Clin Dysmorphol 2008; 17: 229–41.Google Scholar
Allen, LD, Tynan, MJ, Campbell, S, Anderson, RH. Normal fetal cardiac anatomy: a basis for the echocardiographic detection of abnormalities. Prenat Diagn 1981; 1: 131–9.Google Scholar
Chitty, LS, Tan, AW, Nesbit, DL, Hall, CM, Rodeck, CH. Sonographic diagnosis of SEDC and double heterozygote of SEDC and achondroplasia: a report of six pregnancies. Prenat Diagn 2006; 26: 861–5.Google Scholar
Spranger, J. International classification of osteochondrondrodystrophies. The International Working Group on Constitutional Diseases of Bone. Eur J Pediatr 1992; 151: 407–15.Google Scholar
Superti-Furga, A, Bonafe, L, Rimoin, D. Molecular-pathogenetic classification of genetic disorders of the skeleton. Am J Med Genet 2002; 106: 282–93.Google Scholar
Hall, CM. International nosology and classification of constitutional disorders of bone (2001). Am J Med Genet 2002; 113: 65–77.Google Scholar
Chitty, LS, Khalil, A, Barrett, AN, et al. Safer, accurate prenatal diagnosis of thanatophoric dysplasia using ultrasound and cell free fetal DNA. Prenat Diagn 2013; 33: 416–23.Google Scholar
Tavormina, PL, Shiang, R, Thompson, LM, et al. Thanatophoric dysplasia (types I and II) caused by distinct mutations in fibroblast growth factor receptor 3. Nat Genet 1995; 9: 321–8.Google Scholar
Mansour, S, Hall, CM, Pembrey, ME, Young, ID. A clinical and genetic study of campomelic dysplasia. J Med Genet 1995; 32: 415–420.Google Scholar
Mansour, S, Offiah, AC, McDowall, S, et al. The phenotype of survivors of campomelic dysplasia. J Med Genet 2002; 39: 597–602.Google Scholar
Everett, T, Chitty, LS. Cell-free fetal DNA: the new tool in fetal medicine. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 45: 499–507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, M, Finning, K, Martin, P, et al. Non-invasive prenatal determination of fetal sex: translating research into clinical practice. Clin Genet 2011; 80: 68–75.Google Scholar
Sillence, DO, Senn, A, Danks, DM. Genetic heterogeneity in osteogenesis imperfecta. J Med Genet 1979; 16: 101–16.Google Scholar
Pollitt, R, McMahon, R, Nunn, J, et al. Mutation analysis of COL1A1 and COL1A2 in patients diagnosed with osteogenesis imperfecta type I-IV. Hum Mutat 2006; 27: 716.Google Scholar
Thompson, EM, Young, ID, Hall, CM, Pembrey, ME. Recurrence risks and prognosis in severe sporadic osteogenesis imperfecta. J Med Genet 1987; 24: 390–405.Google Scholar
Cole, WG, Dalgleish, R. Syndrome of the month. Perinatal lethal osteogenesis imperfecta. J Med Genet 1995; 32: 284–9.Google Scholar
Sillence, DO, Barlow, KK, Cole, WG, et al. Osteogenesis imperfecta type III: Delineation of the phenotype with reference to genetic heterogeneity. Am J Med Genet 1986; 23: 821–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Engelbert, RH, Uiterwaal, CS, Gulmans, VA, et al. Osteogenesis imperfecta in childhood: Prognosis for walking. J Pediatr 2000; 137: 397–402.Google Scholar
Smith, R. Severe osteogenesis imperfecta: new therapeutic options? BMJ 2001; 322: 63–4.Google Scholar
Sinico, M, Levaillant, JM, Vergnaud, A, et al. Specific osseous spurs in a lethal form of hypophosphatasia correlated with 3D prenatal ultrasonographic images. Prenat Diagn 2007; 27: 222–7.Google Scholar
Walkinshaw, SA, Burn, J. The diagnosis and management of pregnancies complicated by fetal abnormality. In Dunlop, W, Calder, AA (eds), High Risk Pregnancy. Guildford: Butterworths, 1992, pp. 323–8.Google Scholar
Mulivor, RA, Mennuti, M, Zackai, EH, Harris, H. Prenatal diagnosis of hypophosphatasia: genetic, biochemical and clinical studies. Am J Hum Genet 1978; 30: 271–82.Google Scholar
Henthorn, PS, Whyte, MP. Infantile hypophosphatasia: successful prenatal assessment by testing for tissue: non-specific alkaline phosphatase isoenzyme gene mutations. Prenat Diagn 1995; 15: 1001–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mornet, E, Muller, F, Ngo, S, et al. Correlation of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) determination and analysis of the tissue non-specific ALP gene in prenatal diagnosis of severe hypophosphatasia. Prenat Diagn 1999; 19: 755–7.Google Scholar
Elejalde, BR, de Elejalde, MM, Pansch, D. Prenatal diagnosis of Jeune syndrome. Am J Med Genet 1985; 21: 433–8.Google Scholar
Poyner, SE, Bradshaw, WT. Jeune syndrome: considerations for management of asphyxiating thoracic dystrophy. Neonatal Netw 2013; 32: 342–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keppler-Noreuil, KM, Adam, MP, Welch, J, Muilenburg, A, Willing, MC. Clinical insights gained from eight new cases and review of reported cases with Jeune syndrome (asphyxiating thoracic dystrophy). Am J Med Genet A 2011; 155A: 1021–32.Google ScholarPubMed
Elçioglu, NH, Hall, CM. Diagnostic dilemmas in the short rib: polydactyly syndrome group. Am J Med Genet 2002; 111: 392–400.Google Scholar
Chen, CP, Chang, TY, Tzen, CY, Wang, W. Second-trimester sonographic detection of short rib–polydactyly syndrome type II (Majewski) following an abnormal maternal serum biochemical screening result. Prenat Diagn 2003; 23: 353–5.Google Scholar
Ruiz-Perez, V, Ide, SE, Strom, TM, et al. Mutations in a new gene in Ellis–van Creveld syndrome and Weyers acrodental dysostosis. Nat Genet 2000; 24: 283–6.Google Scholar
Baujat, G, Le Merrer, M. Ellis–van Creveld syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2007; 2: 27Google Scholar
Wax, JR, Carpenter, M, Smith, W, et al. Second-trimester sonographic diagnosis of diastrophic dysplasia: report of 2 index cases. J Ultrasound Med 2003; 22: 805–8.Google Scholar
Pryde, PG, Bawle, E, Brandt, F, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of nonrhizomelic chondrodysplasia punctata (Conradi–Hünermann syndrome). Am J Med Genet 1993; 47: 426–31.Google Scholar
Curry, CJR, Magenis, RE, Brown, M, et al. Inherited chondrodysplasia punctata due to a deletion of the terminal short arm of an X chromosome. N Engl J Med 1984; 311: 1010–1015.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Basbug, M, Serin, IS, Ozcelik, B, et al. Prenatal ultrasonographic diagnosis of rhizomelic chondrodysplasia punctata by detection of rhizomelic shortening and bilateral cataracts. Fetal Diagn Ther 2005; 20: 171–4.Google Scholar
Steinberg, SJ, Elçioglu, N, Slade, CM, et al. Peroxisomal disorders: Clinical and biochemical studies in 15 children and prenatal diagnosis in 7 families. Am J Med Genet 1999; 85: 502–10.Google Scholar
Rousseau, F, Bonaventure, J, Legeai-Mallet, L, et al. Mutations in the gene encoding fibroblast growth factor receptor-3 in achondroplasia. Nature 1994; 371: 252–4.Google Scholar
Bellus, GA, Hefferon, TW, Ortiz de Luna, RI, et al. Achondroplasia is defined by recurrent G380R mutations of FGFR3. Am J Hum Genet 1995; 56: 368–73.Google ScholarPubMed
Wilkin, DJ, Szabo, JK, Cameron, R, et al. Mutations in fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 in sporadic cases of achondroplasia occur exclusively on the paternally derived chromosome. Am J Hum Genet 1998; 63: 711–16.Google Scholar
Hunter, AGW, Bankier, A, Rogers, JG, et al. Medical complications of achondroplasia: a multicentre patient review. J Med Genet 1998; 35: 705–12.Google Scholar
Winter, RM, Baraitser, M. The Winter–Baraitser Dysmorphology Database, Version 1.0. London: London Medical Databases, 2006.Google Scholar
Burn, J, Winter, RM, Baraitser, M, et al. The femoral hypoplasia-unusual facies syndrome. J Med Genet 1984; 21: 331–40.Google Scholar
Lenz, W, Zygulska, M, Horst, J. FFU complex: an analysis of 491 cases. Hum Genet 1993; 91: 347–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geipel, A, Berg, C, Germer, U, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of femur-fibula-ulna complex by ultrasound examination at 20 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 22: 79–81.Google Scholar
Pajkrt, E, Cicero, S, Griffin, DR, van Maarle, MC, Chitty, LS. Fetal forearm anomalies: prenatal diagnosis, associations and management strategy. Prenat Diagn 2012; 32: 1084–93.Google Scholar
Van Den Berg, DJ, Francke, U. Roberts syndrome: a review of 100 cases and a new rating system for severity. Am J Med Genet 1993; 47: 1104–23.Google Scholar
Stioui, S, Privitera, O, Brambati, B, et al. First-trimester prenatal diagnosis of Roberts syndrome. Prenat Diagn 1992; 12: 145–9.Google Scholar
Sherer, DM, Sokolovski, M, Dalloul, M, et al. Fetal clavicle length throughout gestation: a nomogram. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 306–10.Google Scholar
Mundlos, S. Cleidocranial dysplasia: clinical and molecular genetics. J Med Genet 1999; 36: 177–82.Google Scholar
Bakalis, S, Sairam, S, Homfray, T, et al. Outcome of antenatally diagnosed talipes equinovarus in an unselected obstetric population. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 20: 226–9.Google Scholar
Offerdal, K, Jebens, N, Blaas, HG, Eik-Nes, SH. Prenatal ultrasound detection of talipes equinovarus in a non-selected population of 49 314 deliveries in Norway. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 30: 838–44.Google Scholar
Hageman, ATM, Gabreels, FJM, Liem, KD, et al. Congenital myotonic dystrophy: A report on thirteen cases and a review of the literature. J Neurol Sci 1993; 115: 95–101.Google Scholar
Hall, JG, Reed, SD, Greene, G. The distal arthrogryposes: delineation of new entities: review and nosologic discussion. Am J Med Genet 1982; 11: 185–239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hageman, G, Ippel, EPF, Beemer, FA, et al. The diagnostic management of newborns with congenital contractures: a nosologic study of 75 cases. Am J Med Genet 1988; 30: 883–904.Google Scholar
Hyett, J, Noble, P, Sebire, NJ, et al. Lethal congenital arthrogryposis presenting with increased nuchal translucency at 10–14 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997; 9: 310–13.Google Scholar
Witters, I, Moerman, P, Fryns, JP. Fetal akinesia deformation sequence: A study of 30 consecutive in utero diagnoses. Am J Med Genet 2002; 113: 23–8.Google Scholar
Newbury-Ecob, R, Leanage, R, Raeburn, JA, Young, ID. Holt–Oram syndrome: a clinical genetic study. J Med Genet 1996; 33: 300–7.Google Scholar
Basson, CT, Cowley, GS, Solomon, SD, et al. The clinical and genetic spectrum of the Holt–Oram syndrome (heart–hand syndrome). N Engl J Med 1994; 330: 885–91.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, KL, Howell, RT, Bottani, A, et al. Thrombocytopenia–absent radius syndrome: a clinical genetic study. J Med Genet 2002; 39: 876–81.Google Scholar
Klopocki, E, Schulze, H, Strauss, G, et al. Complex inheritance pattern resembling autosomal recessive inheritance involving a microdeletion in thrombocytopenia-absent radius syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 2007; 80: 232–240.Google Scholar
Labrune, P, Pons, JC, Khalil, M, et al. Antenatal thrombocytopenia in three patients with TAR (thrombocytopenia with absent radii) syndrome. Prenat Diagn 1993; 13: 463–6.Google Scholar
Albers, CA, Newbury-Ecob, R, Ouwehand, WH, Ghevaert, C. New insights into the genetic basis of TAR (thrombocytopenia-absent radii) syndrome. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2013; 23: 316–23.Google Scholar
Gurrieri, F, Everman, DB. Clinical, genetic, and molecular aspects of split-hand/foot malformation: an update. Am J Med Genet A 2013; 161A: 2860–72.Google Scholar
Penchaszadeh, VB, Negrotti, TC. Ectrodactyly–ectodermal dysplasia–clefting (EEC) syndrome: dominant inheritance and variable expression. J Med Genet 1976; 13: 281–4.Google Scholar
Hyett, JA, Gardiner, G, Stojilkovic-Mikic, T, et al. Reduction in diagnostic and therapeutic interventions by non-invasive determination of fetal sex in early pregnancy. Prenat Diagn 2005; 25: 1111–16.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×