Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T20:01:03.283Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 16 - Fetal Craniospinal and Facial Abnormalities

from Section 3 - Late Prenatal – Fetal Problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 November 2017

David James
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
Philip Steer
Affiliation:
Imperial College London
Carl Weiner
Affiliation:
University of Kansas
Bernard Gonik
Affiliation:
Wayne State University, Detroit
Stephen Robson
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle
Get access

Summary

Craniofacial anomalies include a wide spectrum of malformations. They may be clinically relevant in themselves, and may also be associated with other congenital anomalies, or be a part of a syndrome.

Type
Chapter
Information
High-Risk Pregnancy
Management Options
, pp. 364 - 407
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
First published in: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Myrianthopoulos, NC. Epidemiology of central nervous system malformations. In Vinken, PJ, Bruyn, GW (eds), Handbook of Clinical Neurology. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1977, pp. 139–71.Google Scholar
Salomon, LJ, Alfirevic, Z, Bilardo, CM, et al. ISUOG practice guidelines: performance of first-trimester fetal ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 41: 102–13. PubMed PMID: 23280739.Google Scholar
Chaoui, R, Nicolaides, KH. From nuchal translucency to intracranial translucency: towards the early detection of spina bifida. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 35: 133–8. PubMed PMID: 20101633.Google Scholar
Chen, FC, Gerhardt, J, Entezami, M, Chaoui, R, Henrich, W. Detection of spina bifida by first trimester screening: results of the Prospective Multicenter Berlin IT-Study. Ultraschall Med 2015 Apr 14. [Epub ahead of print]. PubMed PMID: 25876171.Google Scholar
Karl, K, Heling, KS, Chaoui, R. Fluid area measurements in the posterior fossa at 11–13 weeks in normal fetuses and fetuses with open spina bifida. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2015; 37: 289–93. PubMed PMID: 25677252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Volpe, P, Contro, E, Fanelli, T, et al. Appearance of the fetal posterior fossa at 11–14 weeks in fetuses with Dandy–Walker complex or chromosomal anomalies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016; 47: 720–5. PubMed PMID: 25914043.Google Scholar
International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. Sonographic examination of the fetal central nervous system: guidelines for performing the “basic examination” and the “fetal neurosonogram”. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 29: 109–16. PubMed PMID: 17200992.Google Scholar
Salomon, LJ, Alfirevic, Z, Berghella, V, et al. Practice guidelines for performance of the routine mid-trimester fetal ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 37: 116–26. PubMed PMID: 20842655.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benacerraf, BR, Frigoletto, FD, Bieber, FR. The fetal face: ultrasound examination. Radiology 1984; 153: 495–7. PubMed PMID: 6385109.Google Scholar
Ghi, T, Perolo, A, Banzi, C, et al. Two-dimensional ultrasound is accurate in the diagnosis of fetal craniofacial malformation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 19: 543–51. PubMed PMID: 12047531.Google Scholar
Pilu, G, Reece, EA, Romero, R, Bovicelli, L, Hobbins, JC. Prenatal diagnosis of craniofacial malformations with ultrasonography. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 155: 4550. PubMed PMID: 3524242.Google Scholar
Campbell, S, Lees, C, Moscoso, G, Hall, P. Ultrasound antenatal diagnosis of cleft palate by a new technique: the 3D “reverse face” view. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 25: 1218. PubMed PMID: 15619313.Google Scholar
Rotten, D, Levaillant, JM. Two- and three-dimensional sonographic assessment of the fetal face. 2. Analysis of cleft lip, alveolus and palate. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 24: 402–11. PubMed PMID: 15343594.Google Scholar
Campbell, S, Lees, CC. The three-dimensional reverse face (3D RF) view for the diagnosis of cleft palate. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 22: 552–4. PubMed PMID: 14618674.Google Scholar
Pilu, G, Segata, M. A novel technique for visualization of the normal and cleft fetal secondary palate: angled insonation and three-dimensional ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 29: 166–9. PubMed PMID: 17111460.Google Scholar
Platt, LD, Devore, GR, Pretorius, DH. Improving cleft palate/cleft lip antenatal diagnosis by 3-dimensional sonography: the “flipped face” view. J Ultrasound Med 2006; 25: 1423–30. PubMed PMID: 17060428.Google Scholar
Ten, PM, Pedregosa, JP, Santacruz, B, et al. Three-dimensional ultrasound diagnosis of cleft palate: “reverse face”, “flipped face” or “oblique face”: which method is best? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33: 399406. PubMed PMID: 19109803.Google Scholar
Ghi, T, Tani, G, Savelli, L, et al. Prenatal imaging of facial clefts by magnetic resonance imaging with emphasis on the posterior palate. Prenat Diagn 2003; 23: 970–5. PubMed PMID: 14663832.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kazan-Tannus, JF, Levine, D, McKenzie, C, et al. Real-time magnetic resonance imaging aids prenatal diagnosis of isolated cleft palate. J Ultrasound Med 2005; 24: 1533–40. PubMed PMID: 16239657.Google Scholar
Gupta, JK, Bryce, FC, Lilford, RJ. Management of apparently isolated fetal ventriculomegaly. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1994; 49: 716–21. PubMed PMID: 7816396.Google Scholar
Melchiorre, K, Bhide, A, Gika, AD, Pilu, G, Papageorghiou, AT. Counseling in isolated mild fetal ventriculomegaly. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 34: 212–24. PubMed PMID: 19644944.Google Scholar
Agathokleous, M, Chaveeva, P, Poon, LC, Kosinski, P, Nicolaides, KH. Meta-analysis of second-trimester markers for trisomy 21. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41: 247–61. PubMed PMID: 23208748.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, SP, Sebire, NJ, Snijders, RJ, Tunkel, S, Nicolaides, KH. Ultrasound screening for anencephaly at 10–14 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997; 9: 1416. PubMed PMID: 9060123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ghi, T, Pilu, G, Falco, P, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of open and closed spina bifida. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 28: 899903. PubMed PMID: 17086581.Google Scholar
Van den Hof, MC, Nicolaides, KH, Campbell, J, Campbell, S. Evaluation of the lemon and banana signs in one hundred thirty fetuses with open spina bifida. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 322–7. PubMed PMID: 2178424.Google Scholar
Appasamy, M, Roberts, D, Pilling, D, Buxton, N. Antenatal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in localizing the level of lesion in spina bifida and correlation with postnatal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 530–6. PubMed PMID: 16619377.Google Scholar
Khalil, A, Caric, V, Papageorghiou, A, et al. Prenatal prediction of need for ventriculoperitoneal shunt in open spina bifida. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 43: 159–64. PubMed PMID: 24006252.Google Scholar
Goldstein, RB, LaPidus, AS, Filly, RA. Fetal cephaloceles: diagnosis with US. Radiology 1991; 180: 803–8. PubMed PMID: 1871297.Google Scholar
Blaas, HG, Eriksson, AG, Salvesen, KA, et al. Brains and faces in holoprosencephaly: pre- and postnatal description of 30 cases. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 19: 2438. PubMed PMID: 11851965.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santo, S, D’Antonio, F, Homfray, T, et al. Counseling in fetal medicine: agenesis of the corpus callosum. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 40: 513–21. PubMed PMID: 23024003.Google Scholar
Sotiriadis, A, Makrydimas, G. Neurodevelopment after prenatal diagnosis of isolated agenesis of the corpus callosum: an integrative review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206: 337.e1–5. PubMed PMID: 22284958.Google Scholar
Bault, JP, Salomon, LJ, Guibaud, L, Achiron, R. Role of three-dimensional ultrasound measurement of the optic tract in fetuses with agenesis of the septum pellucidum. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 37: 570–5. PubMed PMID: 20878682.Google Scholar
Robinson, AJ. Inferior vermian hypoplasia: preconception, misconception. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 43: 123–36. PubMed PMID: 24497418.Google Scholar
Gandolfi Colleoni, G, Contro, E, Carletti, A, et al. Prenatal diagnosis and outcome of fetal posterior fossa fluid collections. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39: 625–31. PubMed PMID: 22173885.Google Scholar
Limperopoulos, C, Robertson, RL, Estroff, JA, et al. Diagnosis of inferior vermian hypoplasia by fetal magnetic resonance imaging: potential pitfalls and neurodevelopmental outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194: 1070–6. PubMed PMID: 16580298.Google Scholar
Quarello, E, Molho, M, Garel, C, et al. Prenatal abnormal features of the fourth ventricle in Joubert syndrome and related disorders. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 43: 227–32. PubMed PMID: 23868831.Google Scholar
Ghi, T, Simonazzi, G, Perolo, A, et al. Outcome of antenatally diagnosed intracranial hemorrhage: case series and review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 22: 121–30. PubMed PMID: 12905503.Google Scholar
Govaert, P. Prenatal stroke. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2009; 14: 250–66. PubMed PMID: 19664975.Google Scholar
Picone, O, Teissier, N, Cordier, AG, et al. Detailed in utero ultrasound description of 30 cases of congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Prenat Diagn 2014; 34: 518–24. PubMed PMID: 24532345.Google Scholar
Chervenak, FA, Rosenberg, J, Brightman, RC, Chitkara, U, Jeanty, P. A prospective study of the accuracy of ultrasound in predicting fetal microcephaly. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 69: 908–10. PubMed PMID: 3554067.Google Scholar
Stoler-Poria, S, Lev, D, Schweiger, A, Lerman-Sagie, T, Malinger, G. Developmental outcome of isolated fetal microcephaly. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 36: 154–8. PubMed PMID: 20069548.Google Scholar
Schlembach, D, Bornemann, A, Rupprecht, T, Beinder, E. Fetal intracranial tumors detected by ultrasound: a report of two cases and review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999; 14: 407–18. PubMed PMID: 10658280.Google Scholar
Tworetzky, W, McElhinney, DB, Margossian, R, et al. Association between cardiac tumors and tuberous sclerosis in the fetus and neonate. Am J Cardiol 2003; 92: 487–9. PubMed PMID: 12914889.Google Scholar
Sepulveda, W, Platt, CC, Fisk, NM. Prenatal diagnosis of cerebral arteriovenous malformation using color Doppler ultrasonography: case report and review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995; 6: 282–6. PubMed PMID: 8590192.Google Scholar
Garel, C, Azarian, M, Lasjaunias, P, Luton, D. Pial arteriovenous fistulas: dilemmas in prenatal diagnosis, counseling and postnatal treatment. Report of three cases. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 26: 293–6. PubMed PMID: 16052602.Google Scholar
Laurichesse Delmas, H, Winer, N, Gallot, D, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of thrombosis of the dural sinuses: report of six cases, review of the literature and suggested management. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 32: 188–98. PubMed PMID: 18512853.Google Scholar
Malinger, G, Kidron, D, Schreiber, L, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of malformations of cortical development by dedicated neurosonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 29: 178–91. PubMed PMID: 17219377.Google Scholar
Bellis, TH, Wohlgemuth, B. The incidence of cleft lip and palate deformities in the south-east of Scotland (1971–1990). Br J Orthod 1999; 26: 121–5. PubMed PMID: 10420246.Google Scholar
Jones, MC. Prenatal diagnosis of cleft lip and palate: detection rates, accuracy of ultrasonography, associated anomalies, and strategies for counseling. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2002; 39: 169–73. PubMed PMID: 11879073.Google Scholar
Berge, SJ, Plath, H, Van de Vondel, PT, et al. Fetal cleft lip and palate: sonographic diagnosis, chromosomal abnormalities, associated anomalies and postnatal outcome in 70 fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 18: 422–31. PubMed PMID: 11844159.Google Scholar
Nyberg, DA, Sickler, GK, Hegge, FN, Kramer, DJ, Kropp, RJ. Fetal cleft lip with and without cleft palate: US classification and correlation with outcome. Radiology 1995; 195: 677–84. PubMed PMID: 7753993.Google Scholar
Nicolaides, KH, Salvesen, DR, Snijders, RJ, Gosden, CM. Fetal facial defects: associated malformations and chromosomal abnormalities. Fetal Diagn Ther 1993; 8: 19. PubMed PMID: 8452644.Google Scholar
Gabrielli, S, Piva, M, Ghi, T, et al. Bilateral cleft lip and palate without premaxillary protrusion is associated with lethal aneuploidies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 34: 416–18. PubMed PMID: 19697393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mailath-Pokorny, M, Worda, C, Krampl-Bettelheim, E, et al. What does magnetic resonance imaging add to the prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of facial clefts? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 36: 445–51. PubMed PMID: 20617504.Google Scholar
Sepulveda, W, Wong, AE, Martinez-Ten, P, Perez-Pedregosa, J. Retronasal triangle: a sonographic landmark for the screening of cleft palate in the first trimester. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 35: 713. PubMed PMID: 20014330.Google Scholar
Benacerraf, BR, Sadow, PM, Barnewolt, CE, Estroff, JA, Benson, C. Cleft of the secondary palate without cleft lip diagnosed with three-dimensional ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in a fetus with Fryns’ syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 566–70. PubMed PMID: 16619385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, DJ, Moore, MH, Cooter, RD. Tessier clefts revisited with a third dimension. Cleft Palate J 1989; 26: 163–84. PubMed PMID: 2503273.Google Scholar
Kawamoto, HK. The kaleidoscopic world of rare craniofacial clefts: order out of chaos (Tessier classification). Clin Plast Surg 1976; 3: 529–72. PubMed PMID: 788997.Google Scholar
Pilu, G, Romero, R, Rizzo, N, et al. Criteria for the prenatal diagnosis of holoprosencephaly. Am J Perinatol 1987; 4: 41–9. PubMed PMID: 3539134.Google Scholar
Chervenak, FA, Tortora, M, Mayden, K, et al. Antenatal diagnosis of median cleft face syndrome: sonographic demonstration of cleft lip and hypertelorism. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 149: 94–7. PubMed PMID: 6720787.Google Scholar
DeMyer, W. The median cleft face syndrome. Differential diagnosis of cranium bifidum occultum, hypertelorism, and median cleft nose, lip, and palate. Neurology 1967; 17: 961–71. PubMed PMID: 6069608.Google Scholar
Asai, S, Tanaka, M, Miyakoshi, K, et al. A case of Tessier number 7 cleft with severe micrognathia: prenatal sonographic and three-dimensional helical computed tomographic images. Prenat Diagn 2010; 30: 159–61. PubMed PMID: 20013874.Google Scholar
Pilu, G, Visentin, A, Ambrosini, G, D’Antona, D, Andrisani, A. Three-dimensional sonography of unilateral Tessier number 7 cleft in a mid-trimester fetus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 26: 98–9. PubMed PMID: 15909323.Google Scholar
Presti, F, Celentano, C, Marcazzo, L, Dolcetta, G, Prefumo, F. Ultrasound prenatal diagnosis of a lateral facial cleft (Tessier number 7). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 23: 606–8. PubMed PMID: 15170805.Google Scholar
Blazer, S, Zimmer, EZ, Mezer, E, Bronshtein, M. Early and late onset fetal microphthalmia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194: 1354–9. PubMed PMID: 16647921.Google Scholar
Bronshtein, M, Zimmer, E, Gershoni-Baruch, R, et al. First- and second-trimester diagnosis of fetal ocular defects and associated anomalies: report of eight cases. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 77: 443–9. PubMed PMID: 1992414.Google Scholar
Ghi, T, Contro, E, Carletti, A, et al. Prenatal sonographic imaging of Goldenhar syndrome associated with cystic eye. Prenat Diagn 2008; 28: 362–3. PubMed PMID: 18382997.Google Scholar
Tamas, DE, Mahony, BS, Bowie, JD, Woodruff, WW, Kay, HH. Prenatal sonographic diagnosis of hemifacial microsomia (Goldenhar-Gorlin syndrome). J Ultrasound Med 1986; 5: 461–3. PubMed PMID: 3528526.Google Scholar
Rosner, M, Bronshtein, M, Leikomovitz, P, et al. Transvaginal sonographic diagnosis of cataract in a fetus. Eur J Ophthalmol 1996; 6: 90–3. PubMed PMID: 8744858.Google Scholar
Monteagudo, A, Timor-Tritsch, IE, Friedman, AH, Santos, R. Autosomal dominant cataracts of the fetus: early detection by transvaginal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 8: 104–8. PubMed PMID: 8883312.Google Scholar
Davis, WK, Mahony, BS, Carroll, BA, Bowie, JD. Antenatal sonographic detection of benign dacrocystoceles (lacrimal duct cysts). J Ultrasound Med 1987; 6: 461–5. PubMed PMID: 3305983.Google Scholar
Goldberg, H, Sebire, NJ, Holwell, D, Hill, S. Prenatal diagnosis of bilateral dacrocystoceles. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 15: 448–9. PubMed PMID: 10976494.Google Scholar
Bault, JP, Quarello, E. Retinal coloboma: prenatal diagnosis using a new technique, the “virtual fetal eyeground”. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33: 495–6. PubMed PMID: 19308931.Google Scholar
Paladini, D. Fetal micrognathia: almost always an ominous finding. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 35: 377–84. PubMed PMID: 20373481.Google Scholar
Hsieh, YY, Chang, CC, Tsai, HD, et al. The prenatal diagnosis of Pierre-Robin sequence. Prenat Diagn 1999; 19: 567–9. PubMed PMID: 10416975.Google Scholar
Lee, W, McNie, B, Chaiworapongsa, T, et al. Three-dimensional ultrasonographic presentation of micrognathia. J Ultrasound Med 2002; 21: 775–81. PubMed PMID: 12099566.Google Scholar
Paladini, D, Morra, T, Teodoro, A, et al. Objective diagnosis of micrognathia in the fetus: the jaw index. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 93: 382–6. PubMed PMID: 10074984.Google Scholar
Pilu, G, Romero, R, Reece, EA, Jeanty, P, Hobbins, JC. The prenatal diagnosis of Robin anomalad. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 154: 630–2. PubMed PMID: 3513591.Google Scholar
Rotten, D, Levaillant, JM, Martinez, H, Ducou le Pointe H, Vicaut E. The fetal mandible: a 2D and 3D sonographic approach to the diagnosis of retrognathia and micrognathia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 19: 122–30. PubMed PMID: 11876802.Google Scholar
Bronshtein, M, Blazer, S, Zalel, Y, Zimmer, EZ. Ultrasonographic diagnosis of glossoptosis in fetuses with Pierre Robin sequence in early and mid pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: 1561–4. PubMed PMID: 16202757.Google Scholar
Vettraino, IM, Lee, W, Bronsteen, RA, et al. Clinical outcome of fetuses with sonographic diagnosis of isolated micrognathia. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102: 801–5. PubMed PMID: 14551011.Google Scholar
Chervenak, FA, Tortora, M, Moya, FR, Hobbins, JC. Antenatal sonographic diagnosis of epignathus. J Ultrasound Med 1984; 3: 235–7. PubMed PMID: 6726887.Google Scholar
Gull, I, Wolman, I, Har-Toov, J, et al. Antenatal sonographic diagnosis of epignathus at 15 weeks of pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999; 13: 271–3. PubMed PMID: 10341408.Google Scholar
Chen, CP, Shih, JC, Huang, JK, et al. Two- and three-dimensional ultrasound demonstration of a giant epignathus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21: 407–9. PubMed PMID: 12704754.Google Scholar
Dar, P, Rosenthal, J, Factor, S, Dubiosso, R, Murthy, AS. First-trimester diagnosis of fetal epignathus with 2- and 3-dimensional sonography. J Ultrasound Med 2009; 28: 1743–6. PubMed PMID: 19933492.Google Scholar
Ruano, R, Benachi, A, Aubry, MC, et al. The impact of 3-dimensional ultrasonography on perinatal management of a large epignathus teratoma without ex utero intrapartum treatment. J Pediatr Surg 2005; 40: e31–4. PubMed PMID: 16291137.Google Scholar
Sherer, DM, Zigalo, A, Abulafia, O. Prenatal 3-dimensional sonographic diagnosis of a massive fetal epignathus occluding the oral orifice and both nostrils at 35 weeks’ gestation. J Ultrasound Med 2006; 25: 1503–5. PubMed PMID: 17060444.Google Scholar
Munro, IR, Sinclair, WJ, Rudd, NL. Maxillonasal dysplasia (Binder’s syndrome). Plast Reconstr Surg 1979; 63: 657–63. PubMed PMID: 432334.Google Scholar
Cook, K, Prefumo, F, Presti, F, Homfray, T, Campbell, S. The prenatal diagnosis of Binder syndrome before 24 weeks of gestation: case report. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 16: 578–81. PubMed PMID: 11169356.Google Scholar
Cuillier, F, Cartault, F, Lemaire, P, Alessandri, JL. Maxillo-nasal dysplasia (Binder syndrome): antenatal discovery and implications. Fetal Diagn Ther 2005; 20: 301–5. PubMed PMID: 15980645.Google Scholar
Lajeunie, E, Le Merrer, M, Bonaiti-Pellie, C, Marchac, D, Renier, D. Genetic study of nonsyndromic coronal craniosynostosis. Am J Med Genet 1995; 55: 500–4. PubMed PMID: 7762595.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boulet, SL, Rasmussen, SA, Honein, MA. A population-based study of craniosynostosis in metropolitan Atlanta, 1989–2003. Am J Med Genet A 2008; 146A: 984–91. PubMed PMID: 18344207.Google Scholar
Wilkie, AO, Byren, JC, Hurst, JA, et al. Prevalence and complications of single-gene and chromosomal disorders in craniosynostosis. Pediatrics 2010; 126: e391–400. PubMed PMID: 20643727.Google Scholar
Robin, NH, Falk, MJ, Haldeman-Englert, CR. FGFR-Related Craniosynostosis Syndromes. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Seattle, 1993–1998 [updated 2007 Sep 27].Google Scholar
Anderson, FM, Geiger, L. Craniosynostosis: a survey of 204 cases. J Neurosurg 1965; 22: 229–40. PubMed PMID: 14306216.Google Scholar
Shillito, J Jr., Matson, DD. Craniosynostosis: a review of 519 surgical patients. Pediatrics 1968; 41: 829–53. PubMed PMID: 5643989.Google Scholar
van der Meulen, J, van der Hulst, R, van Adrichem, L, et al. The increase of metopic synostosis: a pan-European observation. J Craniofac Surg 2009; 20: 283–6. PubMed PMID: 19326483.Google Scholar
Kolar, JC. An epidemiological study of nonsyndromal craniosynostoses. J Craniofac Surg 2011; 22: 47–9. PubMed PMID: 21187784.Google Scholar
Carinci, F, Pezzetti, F, Locci, P, et al. Apert and Crouzon syndromes: clinical findings, genes and extracellular matrix. J Craniofac Surg 2005; 16: 361–8. PubMed PMID: 15915098.Google Scholar
Vogels, A, Fryns, JP. Pfeiffer syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2006; 1: 19. PubMed PMID: 16740155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greally, M. Shprintzen–Goldberg Syndrome. Seattle, WA: University of Washington, Seattle, 1993–2006 Jan 13 [updated 2010 Nov 16].Google Scholar
Brahman, S, Jenna, R, Wittenauer, HJ. Sonographic in utero appearance of Kleeblattschadel syndrome. J Clin Ultrasound 1979; 7: 481–4. PubMed PMID: 118189.Google Scholar
Salvo, AF. In utero diagnosis of Kleeblattschadel (cloverleaf skull). Prenat Diagn 1981; 1: 141–5. PubMed PMID: 7346817.Google Scholar
Benacerraf, BR, Spiro, R, Mitchell, AG. Using three-dimensional ultrasound to detect craniosynostosis in a fetus with Pfeiffer syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 16: 391–4. PubMed PMID: 11169319.Google Scholar
Saal, HM, Bulas, DI, Allen, JF, et al. Patient with craniosynostosis and marfanoid phenotype (Shprintzen-Goldberg syndrome) and cloverleaf skull. Am J Med Genet 1995; 57: 573–8. PubMed PMID: 7573131.Google Scholar
Skidmore, DL, Pai, AP, Toi, A, Steele, L, Chitayat, D. Prenatal diagnosis of Apert syndrome: report of two cases. Prenat Diagn 2003; 23: 1009–13. PubMed PMID: 14663839.Google Scholar
Filkins, K, Russo, JF, Boehmer, S, et al. Prenatal ultrasonographic and molecular diagnosis of Apert syndrome. Prenat Diagn 1997; 17: 1081–4. PubMed PMID: 9399359.Google Scholar
Miller, C, Losken, HW, Towbin, R, et al. Ultrasound diagnosis of craniosynostosis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2002; 39: 7380. PubMed PMID: 11772173.Google Scholar
Delahaye, S, Bernard, JP, Renier, D, Ville, Y. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of fetal craniosynostosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21: 347–53. PubMed PMID: 12704742.Google Scholar
Ginath, S, Debby, A, Malinger, G. Demonstration of cranial sutures and fontanelles at 15 to 16 weeks of gestation: a comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasonography. Prenat Diagn 2004; 24: 812–15. PubMed PMID: 15503277.Google Scholar
Chaoui, R, Levaillant, JM, Benoit, B, et al. Three-dimensional sonographic description of abnormal metopic suture in second- and third-trimester fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 26: 761–4. PubMed PMID: 16308900.Google Scholar
Esser, T, Rogalla, P, Bamberg, C, Kalache, KD. Application of the three-dimensional maximum mode in prenatal diagnosis of Apert syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: 1743–5. PubMed PMID: 16260220.Google Scholar
Lam, H, Lo, TK, Lau, E, Chin, R, Tang, L. The use of 2- and 3-dimensional sonographic scans in the evaluation of cranial sutures: prenatal diagnosis of Apert syndrome. J Ultrasound Med 2006; 25: 1481–4. PubMed PMID: 17060439.Google Scholar
Faro, C, Chaoui, R, Wegrzyn, P, et al. Metopic suture in fetuses with Apert syndrome at 22–27 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 2833. PubMed PMID: 16317802.Google Scholar
Itoh, S, Nojima, M, Yoshida, K. Usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging for accurate diagnosis of Pfeiffer syndrome type II in utero. Fetal Diagn Ther 2006; 21: 168–71. PubMed PMID: 16490997.Google Scholar
Fjortoft, MI, Sevely, A, Boetto, S, Kessler, S, Sarramon, MF, Rolland, M. Prenatal diagnosis of craniosynostosis: value of MR imaging. Neuroradiology 2007; 49: 515–21. PubMed PMID: 17310357.Google Scholar
Weber, B, Schwabegger, AH, Vodopiutz, J, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of Apert syndrome with cloverleaf skull deformity using ultrasound, fetal magnetic resonance imaging and genetic analysis. Fetal Diagn Ther 2010; 27: 51–6. PubMed PMID: 19940464.Google Scholar
Nazzaro, A, Della Monica, M, Lonardo, F, et al. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of a case of Pfeiffer syndrome without cloverleaf skull and review of the literature. Prenat Diagn 2004; 24: 918–22. PubMed PMID: 15565658.Google Scholar
Kapp-Simon, KA, Speltz, ML, Cunningham, ML, Patel, PK, Tomita, T. Neurodevelopment of children with single suture craniosynostosis: a review. Childs Nerv Syst 2007; 23: 269–81. PubMed PMID: 17186250.Google Scholar
Chieffo, D, Tamburrini, G, Massimi, L, et al. Long-term neuropsychological development in single-suture craniosynostosis treated early. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2010; 5: 232–7. PubMed PMID: 20192638.Google Scholar
Warschausky, S, Angobaldo, J, Kewman, D, et al. Early development of infants with untreated metopic craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115: 1518–23. PubMed PMID: 15861054CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×