Book contents
- Diversity and Precarious Work during Socio-economic Upheaval
- Diversity and Precarious Work during Socio-economic Upheaval
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Pandemic Precarities and Gendered Biopolitics within the Neoliberal University
- 3 LGBTQ+ Individuals and Precarious Work
- 4 Age, Gender, and Precarity
- 5 How the (In)Ability of Using One’s Disability Strategically Reinforces Inequality and Precariousness amongst Disabled Workers
- 6 Classed and Gendered Experiences of Precarity in Dirty Work
- 7 Precarity and Diversity
- 8 Precarious Work in the Gig Economy
- 9 Refugees’ Vulnerability towards Precarious Work
- 10 Trapped in Precarious Work
- 11 How Precarity Is Threaded into Migration Rules
- 12 Culture, Precarity, and Dignity
- 13 Transforming Humanitarianism
- 14 Artificial Intelligence, the Gig Economy, and Precarity
- Index
- References
9 - Refugees’ Vulnerability towards Precarious Work
An Intersectionality Perspective
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 February 2024
Book contents
- Diversity and Precarious Work during Socio-economic Upheaval
- Diversity and Precarious Work during Socio-economic Upheaval
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Pandemic Precarities and Gendered Biopolitics within the Neoliberal University
- 3 LGBTQ+ Individuals and Precarious Work
- 4 Age, Gender, and Precarity
- 5 How the (In)Ability of Using One’s Disability Strategically Reinforces Inequality and Precariousness amongst Disabled Workers
- 6 Classed and Gendered Experiences of Precarity in Dirty Work
- 7 Precarity and Diversity
- 8 Precarious Work in the Gig Economy
- 9 Refugees’ Vulnerability towards Precarious Work
- 10 Trapped in Precarious Work
- 11 How Precarity Is Threaded into Migration Rules
- 12 Culture, Precarity, and Dignity
- 13 Transforming Humanitarianism
- 14 Artificial Intelligence, the Gig Economy, and Precarity
- Index
- References
Summary
Despite the central role of employment for integration, refugees are particularly vulnerable to under- and unemployment, and are more likely to find themselves in precarious working conditions compared to host country residents. Frequently discussed reasons for this are, for example, legal restrictions, health issues, and non-recognition of qualifications. We draw on the concept of intersectionality and the psychology of working theory and use data that we have collected with women and men refugees in Turkey and in the Netherlands. We use narrative accounts of four refugees to show how refugees’ gender relates to their vulnerability towards precarious work and how this relationship is further complicated by refugees’ economic status in their home country as well as by the societal expectations and protection in the host environment. By discussing these relationships and their relevance in the larger context of economic and societal upheaval, we suggest several avenues for future research.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Diversity and Precarious Work During Socio-Economic UpheavalExploring the Missing Link, pp. 163 - 182Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
References
Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & society, 20(4), 441–464.Google Scholar
Ager, A., & Strang, A. (2008). Understanding integration: A conceptual framework. Journal of Refugee Studies, 21(2), 166–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alon, T. M., Doepke, M., Olmstead-Rumsey, J., & Tertilt, M. (2020). The Impact of COVID-19 on Gender Equality (No. w26947). National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anthias, F. (2008). Thinking through the lens of translocational positionality: An intersectionality frame for understanding identity and belonging. Translocations: Migration and Social Change, 4(1), 5–20.Google Scholar
Asylum in Europe. (2021). Statistics – Asylum Information Database | European Council on Refugees and Exiles. Retrieved 2 May 2021, from https://asylumineurope.org/reports/country/netherlands/statistics/.Google Scholar
Baban, F., Ilcan, S., & Rygiel, K. (2017). Syrian refugees in Turkey: Pathways to precarity, differential inclusion, and negotiated citizenship rights. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 43(1), 41–57Google Scholar
Baranik, L. E., Hurst, C. S., & Eby, L. T. (2018). The stigma of being a refugee: A mixed-method study of refugees’ experiences of vocational stress. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 105, 116–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bidwell, M., Briscoe, F., Fernandez-Mateo, I., & Sterling, A. (2013). The employment relationship and inequality: How and why changes in employment practices are reshaping rewards in organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 61–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2013.761403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, I., & Price, R. (2016). Precarious work and precarious workers: Towards an improved conceptualisation. Economic and Labour Relations Review, 27(3), 314–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/1035304616652074.Google Scholar
Cappelli, P., & Keller, J. (2012). Classifying work in the new economy. Academy of Management Review, 38(4), 575–596. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0302.Google Scholar
Cheung, S. Y., & Phillimore, J. (2013). Refugees, social capital, and labour market integration in the UK. Sociology, 38038513491467. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0038038513491467.Google Scholar
Cole, E. R. (2009). Intersectionality and research in psychology. American Psychologist, 64(3), 170–180. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014564.Google Scholar
Colic-Peisker, V. (2006). Employment niches for recent refugees: Segmented labour market in twenty-first century Australia. Journal of Refugee Studies, 19(2), 203–229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fej016.Google Scholar
Davis, A. (1982). Women, race and class: An activist perspective. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 10(4), 5.Google Scholar
De Vroome, T., & Van Tubergen, F. (2010). The employment experience of refugees in the Netherlands. International Migration Review, 44(2), 376–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dedeoglu, S. (2011). Survival of the excluded: Azerbaijani immigrant women’s survival strategies and industrial work in Istanbul. Migration Letters. 8(1), Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/openview/45980f71ed4aa36e2ba616bfff674946/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=456300.Google Scholar
Duffy, R. D., Blustein, D. L., Diemer, M. A., & Autin, K. L. (2016). The Psychology of Working Theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 63(2), 127–148. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/cou0000140Google Scholar
Essers, C., Benschop, Y., & Doorewaard, H. (2010). Female ethnicity: Understanding Muslim immigrant businesswomen in the Netherlands. Gender, Work and Organization, 17(3), 320–339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2008.00425.x.Google Scholar
Ferraro, F., Etzion, D., & Gehman, J. (2015). Tackling grand challenges pragmatically: Robust action revisited. Organization Studies, 36(3), 363–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gangamma, R., & Shipman, D. (2018). Transnational intersectionality in family therapy with resettled refugees. Journal of marital and family therapy, 44(2), 206–219.Google Scholar
Gavett, G., & Perry, M. (2019, September 27). The Gender Gap in 6 Charts. Retrieved December 20, 2019, from Harvard Business Review website: https://hbr.org/2019/09/the-gender-gap-in-6-charts.Google Scholar
Gemenne, F. (2015). One good reason to speak of “climate refugees”. Forced Migration Review, 49, 70–71.Google Scholar
George, G., Howard-Grenville, J., Joshi, A., & Tihanyi, L. (2016). Understanding and tackling societal grand challenges through management research. Academy of Management Journal, 59(6), 1880–1895.Google Scholar
Giri, A (2018) From refuge to riches? An analysis of refugees’ wage assimilation in the United States. International Migration Review, 52(1), 125–158.Google Scholar
Hardy, C. (1994). Underorganized interorganizational domains: The case of refugee systems. The journal of applied behavioral science, 30(3), 278–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, B. (2011). Informal hierarchies among workers in low-skill food manufacturing jobs. Industrial Relations Journal, 42(5), 486–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard‐Grenville, J. (2020). Grand Challenges, Covid‐19 and the Future of Organizational Scholarship. Journal of Management Studies, 58(1), 254–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ILO. (2021). Promoting Decent Work For Syrians Under Temporary Protection and Turkish Citizens. Ilo.org. Retrieved 2 May 2021, from www.ilo.org/ankara/projects/WCMS_710959/lang--en/index.htm.Google Scholar
Janssens, M., & Steyaert, C. (2019). A practice-based theory of diversity: Respecifying (in) equality in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 44(3), 518–537.Google Scholar
Kalleberg, A. L., & Vallas, S. P. (2017). Probing precarious work: Theory, research, and politics. Research in the Sociology of Work, 31, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0277-283320170000031017.Google Scholar
Kartal, B., & Basci, E. (2014). Türkiye’ye yönelik mülteci ve siginmaci hareketleri (asylum-seeker and refugee movement towards Turkey). CBÜ. Journal of Social Sciences, 12(2), 275–299.Google Scholar
Knappert, L., Kornau, A., & Figengül, M. (2018). Refugees’ exclusion at work and the intersection with gender: Insights from the Turkish-Syrian border. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 105, 62–82.Google Scholar
Knappert, L., van Dijk, H., & Ross, V. (2019). Refugees’ inclusion at work: a qualitative cross-level analysis. Career Development International.Google Scholar
Kornau, A., Knappert, L., & Erdur, D. A. (2021). Advertising, avoiding, disrupting, and tabooing: The discursive construction of diversity subjects in the Turkish context. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 37(2), 101151.Google Scholar
Lee, E. O. J., & Brotman, S. (2013). Speak out! Structural intersectionality and anti-oppressive practice with LGBTQ refugees in Canada. Canadian Social Work Review/Revue Canadienne De Service Social, 30(2), 157–183.Google Scholar
Lee, E. S., Szkudlarek, B., Nguyen, D. C., & Nardon, L. (2020). Unveiling the Canvas Ceiling: A multidisciplinary literature review of refugee employment and workforce integration. International Journal of Management Reviews, 22(2), 193–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muhanna-Matar, A. (2022). The emerging intersectional performative gender of displaced Syrian women in southeast Turkey. Gender, Place & Culture, 29(6), 772–792, DOI: 10.1080/0966369X.2021.1887091.Google Scholar
Naccache, P, Al Ariss, A (2018) The forced migration crisis and the role of European corporations: a point of view. European Management Review 15(4), 589–596.Google Scholar
Ortlieb, R., & Weiss, S. (2020). Job quality of refugees in Austria: Trade-offs between multiple workplace characteristics. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(4), 418–442.Google Scholar
Ortlieb, R., Eggenhofer‐Rehart, P., Leitner, S., Hosner, R., & Landesmann, M. (2020). Do Austrian Programmes Facilitate Labour Market Integration of Refugees? International Migration, 1–21.Google Scholar
Özbilgin, M. F., Syed, J., Ali, F., & Torunoglu, D. (2012). International transfer of policies and practices of gender equality in employment to and among Muslim majority countries. Gender, Work & Organization, 19(4), 345–369.Google Scholar
Ponzoni, E, Ghorashi, H, Van der Raad, S (2017) Caught between norm and difference: narratives on refugees’ inclusion in organizations. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion 36(3), 222–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purkayastha, B. (2012). Intersectionality in a transnational world. Gender & Society, 26(1), 55–66. https://doi-org.vu-nl.idm.oclc.org/10.1177/0891243211426725.Google Scholar
Syed, J., & Özbilgin, M. (2009). A relational framework for international transfer of diversity management practices. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(12), 2435–2453.Google Scholar
Tomlinson, F (2010) Marking difference and negotiating belonging: refugee women, volunteering and employment. Gender, Work and Organization 17(3), 278–296.Google Scholar
UNHCR. (2019). Global Trends report. Retrieved 2 May 2021, from www.unhcr.org/be/wp-content/uploads/sites/46/2020/07/Global-Trends-Report-2019.pdf.Google Scholar
UNCHR. (2020). Figures at a Glance. UNHCR. Retrieved 2 May 2021, from www.unhcr.org/figures-at-a-glance.html.Google Scholar
UNCHR. (2021). Livelihoods – UNHCR Turkey. Retrieved 2 May 2021, from https://help.unhcr.org/turkey/information-for-syrians/livelihoods/.Google Scholar
UNHCR. (2021). Refugees and Asylum Seekers in Turkey – UNHCR Turkey. Retrieved 2 May 2021, from www.unhcr.org/tr/en/refugees-and-asylum-seekers-in-turkey.Google Scholar
Ünlütürk-Ulutaş, Ç., & Akbaş, S. (2020). The Most Invisible of the Invisibles: Skilled Syrian Women in the Turkish Labour Market. In Women, Migration and Asylum in Turkey (pp. 193–212). Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Van Hear, N. (2006). “I went as far as my money would take me”: conflict, forced migration and class. Forced migration and global processes: A view from forced migration studies, 125–158.Google Scholar
Vervliet, M., De Mol, J., Broekaert, E., & Derluyn, I. (2014). “That I live, that’s because of her”: Intersectionality as framework for unaccompanied refugee mothers. British Journal of Social Work, 44(7), 2023–2041.Google Scholar
Wehrle, K., Klehe, U.-C., Kira, M., Zikic, J. (2018) “Can I Come as I am? Refugees’ Vocational Identity Threats, Coping, and Growth”, Journal of Vocational Behavior 105(1), 83–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, S., & Ebert, N. (2013). Precarious work: Economic, sociological and political perspectives. Economic and Labour Relations Review, 24(3), 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/1035304613500434.Google Scholar