Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T16:26:54.737Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 14 - Postoperative nausea and vomiting management: cost-effectiveness and patient outcome

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2016

By
Paul S. Myles
Edited by
Tong Joo Gan  and
Ashraf S. Habib
Foreword by
Henrik Kehlet
Tong Joo Gan
Affiliation:
Duke University Medical Center, Durham
Ashraf S. Habib
Affiliation:
Duke University Medical Center, Durham
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
A Practical Guide
 , pp. 146 - 155
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gan, T, Ing, R, de L Dear, G, et al. How much are patients willing to pay to avoid intraoperative awareness? J Clin Anesth 2003; 15: 108–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gan, TJ, Diemunsch, P, Habib, AS, et al. SAMBA Consensus guidelines for the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg 2014; 118: 85–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishof, RO, Nash, DB. Cost-effectiveness and cost containment. A physician’s primer. Prim Care 1996; 23: 115–26.Google ScholarPubMed
Coronini-Cronberg, S, Appleby, J, Thompson, J. Application of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) data to estimate cost-effectiveness of hernia surgery in England. J R Soc Med 2013; 106: 278–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frighetto, L, Loewen, PS, Dolman, J, et al. Cost-effectiveness of prophylactic dolasetron or droperidol vs rescue therapy in the prevention of PONV in ambulatory gynecologic surgery. Can J Anaesth 1999; 46: 536–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillespie, EL, White, CM, Kluger, J, et al. A hospital perspective on the cost-effectiveness of beta-blockade for prophylaxis of atrial fibrillation after cardiothoracic surgery. Clin Ther 2005; 27: 1963–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gomes, M, Soares, MO, Dumville, JC, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of general anaesthesia versus local anaesthesia for carotid surgery (GALA Trial). Br J Surg 2010; 97: 1218–25.Google ScholarPubMed
Johnstone, R, Martinec, C. Anesthesia studies should include costs. Anesthesiology 1993; 79: 195–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lake, AP, Hugo, S, Coetzee, G, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of antiemetic therapy for ambulatory surgery. J Clin Anesth 1995; 7: 551–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCabe, C, Claxton, K, Culyer, AJ. The NICE cost-effectiveness threshold: what it is and what that means. Pharmacoeconomics 2008; 26: 733–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parra-Sanchez, I, Abdallah, R, You, J, et al. A time–motion economic analysis of postoperative nausea and vomiting in ambulatory surgery. Can J Anaesth 2012; 59: 366–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rennie, L, Porteous, T, Ryan, M. Preferences for managing symptoms of differing severity: a discrete choice experiment. Value Health 2012; 15: 1069–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watcha, M. The cost-effective management of postoperative nausea and vomiting (editorial). Anesthesiology 2000; 92: 931–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watcha, MF, Smith, I. Cost-effectiveness analysis of antiemetic therapy for ambulatory surgery. J Clin Anesth 1994; 6: 370–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chang, P, Okamoto, M, Chen, J, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of ondansetron and prochlorperazine for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. J Manag Care Pharm 2005; 11: 317–21.Google ScholarPubMed
Kranke, P, Eberhart, LH. Possibilities and limitations in the pharmacological management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2011; 28: 758–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kapur, PA. The big “little problem”. Anesth Analg 1991; 73(3):243–5.Google ScholarPubMed
Gagnon, JP, Osterhaus, JT. Proposed drug–drug cost effectiveness methodology. Ann Pharmacother 2006; 40: 524–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drummond, MF, Jefferson, TO. Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ. The BMJ Economic Evaluation Working Party. BMJ 1996; 313: 275–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, JE, Weinstein, MC, Russell, LB, et al. Recommendations for reporting cost-effectiveness analyses. Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. JAMA 1996; 276: 1339–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weinstein, MC, Siegel, JE, Gold, MR, et al. Recommendations of the Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. JAMA 1996; 276: 1253–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barshes, NR, Chambers, JD, Cantor, SB, et al. A primer on cost-effectiveness analyses for vascular surgeons. J Vasc Surg 2012; 55: 1794–800.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elliot, RA. The economics of anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2001; 18: 205–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carroll, NV, Miederhoff, PA, Cox, FM, et al. Costs incurred by outpatient surgical centers in managing postoperative nausea and vomiting. J Clin Anesth 1994; 6: 364–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moschetti, K, Favre, D, Pinget, C, et al. Comparative cost-effectiveness analyses of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and coronary angiography combined with fractional flow reserve for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2014; 16: 13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berenguer, F, Bean, RJ, Bozec, L, et al. Coherent x-ray imaging of collagen fibril distributions within intact tendons. Biophys J 2014; 106: 459–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diez, L. Assessing the willingness of parents to pay for reducing postoperative emesis in children. Pharmacoeconomics 1998; 13: 589–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weinstein, MC. How much are Americans willing to pay for a quality-adjusted life year? Med Care 2008; 46: 343–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franken, MG, van Gils, CW, Gaultney, JG, et al. Practical feasibility of outcomes research in oncology: lessons learned in assessing drug use and cost-effectiveness in The Netherlands. Eur J Cancer 2013; 49: 8–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Selby, JV, Beal, AC, Frank, L. The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) national priorities for research and initial research agenda. JAMA 2012; 307: 1583–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Black, N, Varaganum, M, Hutchings, A. Relationship between patient reported experience (PREMs) and patient reported outcomes (PROMs) in elective surgery. BMJ Qual Saf 2014; 23: 534–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myles, PS, Hunt, JO, Nightingale, CE, et al. Development and psychometric testing of a quality of recovery score after general anesthesia and surgery in adults. Anesth Analg 1999; 88: 83–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Basch, E. New frontiers in patient-reported outcomes: adverse event reporting, comparative effectiveness, and quality assessment. Annu Rev Med 2014; 65: 307–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDowell, A, Fothergill, JA, Khan, A, et al. A cyclodextrin formulation to improve use of the anesthetic tribromoethanol (Avertin). J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2014; 6: 16–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Madhusudhan, S, Hussain, A, Sahni, JN. Value of anti-VEGF treatment in choroidal neovascularization associated with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy. Digit J Ophthalmol 2013; 19: 59–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hajeer, AH, Al Balwi, MA, Aytul Uyar, F, et al. HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1 and -DQB1 allele and haplotype frequencies in Saudis using next generation sequencing technique. Tissue Antigens 2013; 82: 252–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fritzsche, M, Thorogate, R, Charras, G. Quantitative analysis of ezrin turnover dynamics in the actin cortex. Biophys J 2014; 106: 343–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Institute of Medicine. Evaluation of biomarkers and surrogate endpoints in chronic disease, 2010. www.iomedu/Reports/2010/Evaluation-of-Biomarkers-and-Surrogate-Endpointsin-Chronic-DiseaseaspxGoogle Scholar
Fisher, DM. Surrogate outcomes: meaningful not! Anesthesiology 1999; 90: 355–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ricotta, C, Celesti-Grapow, L, Kuhn, I, et al. Geographical constraints are stronger than invasion patterns for European urban floras. PLoS ONE 2014; 9: e85661.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Myles, PS, Wengritzky, R. Simplified postoperative nausea and vomiting impact scale for audit and post-discharge review. Br J Anaesth 2012; 108: 423–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, DP, Maccormick, IJ, Phythian-Adams, AT, et al. Network analysis reveals distinct clinical syndromes underlying acute mountain sickness. PLoS ONE 2014; 9: e81229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Royse, CF, Newman, S, Chung, F, et al. Development and feasibility of a scale to assess postoperative recovery: the post-operative quality recovery scale. Anesthesiology 2010; 113: 892–905.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Myles, PS, Weitkamp, B, Jones, K, et al. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40. Br J Anaesth 2000; 84: 11–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stark, PA, Myles, PS, Burke, JA. Development and psychometric evaluation of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-15. Anesthesiology 2013; 118: 1332–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berg, K, Kjellgren, K, Unosson, M, et al. Postoperative recovery and its association with health-related quality of life among day surgery patients. BMC Nurs 2012; 11: 24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, C, Blakey, G, 3rd, Jaskolka, M. Recovery after orthognathic surgery: short-term health-related quality of life outcomes. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 66: 2110–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gornall, BF, Myles, PS, Smith, CL, et al. Measurement of quality of recovery using the QoR-40: a quantitative systematic review. Br J Anaesth 2013; 111: 161–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, GS, Szokol, JW, Greenberg, SB, et al. Preoperative dexamethasone enhances quality of recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: effect on in-hospital and postdischarge recovery outcomes. Anesthesiology 2011; 114: 882–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, SH, Oh, YJ, Park, BW, et al. Effects of single-dose dexmedetomidine on the quality of recovery after modified radical mastectomy: a randomised controlled trial. Minerva Anestesiol 2013; 79: 1248–58.Google ScholarPubMed
Carlisle, JB, Stevenson, CA. Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006: CD004125.Google ScholarPubMed
Kooij, FO, Klok, T, Hollmann, MW, et al. Decision support increases guideline adherence for prescribing postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis. Anesth Analg 2008; 106: 893–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pergolizzi, JV, Pappagallo, M, LeQuang, J, et al. New health care measures: emphasis on better management of postsurgical pain and postoperative nausea and vomiting. Hosp Pract (1995) 2014; 42: 65–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pierre, S, Corno, G, Benais, H, et al. A risk score-dependent antiemetic approach effectively reduces postoperative nausea and vomiting – a continuous quality improvement initiative. Can J Anaesth 2004; 51: 320–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolanek, B, Svartz, L, Robin, F, et al. Management program decreases postoperative nausea and vomiting in high-risk and in general surgical patients: a quality improvement cycle. Minerva Anestesiol 2014; 80: 337–46.Google ScholarPubMed
Apfel, CC, Laara, E, Koivuranta, M, et al. A simplified risk score for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting: conclusions from cross-validations between two centers. Anesthesiology 1999; 91: 693–700.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frenzel, JC, Kee, SS, Ensor, JE, et al. Ongoing provision of individual clinician performance data improves practice behavior. Anesth Analg 2010; 111: 515–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, R, Lubarsky, D, Phillips-Bute, B, et al. Cost-effectiveness of prophylactic antiemetic therapy with ondansetron, droperidol or placebo. Anesthesiology 2000; 92: 958–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, RP, Lubarsky, DA, Phillips-Bute, B, et al. Cost-effectiveness of prophylactic antiemetic therapy with ondansetron, droperidol, or placebo. Anesthesiology 2000; 92: 958–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tramer, MR, Phillips, C, Reynolds, DJ, et al. Cost-effectiveness of ondansetron for postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anaesthesia 1999; 54: 226–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paech, MJ, Rucklidge, MW, Banks, SL, et al. The efficacy and cost-effectiveness of prophylactic 5-hydroxytryptamine3 receptor antagonists: tropisetron, ondansetron and dolasetron. Anaesth Intensive Care 2003; 31: 11–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pueyo, FJ, Lopez-Olaondo, L, Sanchez-Ledesma, MJ, et al. Cost-effectiveness of three combinations of antiemetics in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Br J Anaesth 2003; 91: 589–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sennaraj, B, Shende, D, Ilavajady, S, Sadhasivam, S, Jagan, D. Management of post-strabismus nausea and vomiting in children using ondansetron: a value-based comparison of outcomes. Br J Anaesth 2002; 89: 473–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Olutoye, O, Jantzen, EC, Alexis, R, et al. A comparison of the costs and efficacy of ondansetron and dolasetron in the prophylaxis of postoperative vomiting in pediatric patients undergoing ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg 2003; 97: 390–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×