Arrow, H., McGrath, J. E., & Berdahl, J. L. (2000). Small groups as complex systems: Formation, coordination, development, and adaptation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Austin, J. L. (1975). How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Axelrod, R. (Ed.) (1976). Structure of decision. The cognitive maps of political elites. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis (2nd edn.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakeman, R., & Quera, V. (1995). Analyzing interaction: Sequential analysis with SDIS and GSEQ. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small groups. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Bales, R. F., & Cohen, S. P. (1979). SYMLOG: A system for the multiple level observation of groups. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar

Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York, NY: Ballantine.Google Scholar

Beck, D., & Orth, B. (1995). Wer wendet sich an wen? – Muster in der Interaktion kooperierender Kleingruppen [Who addresses whom? Interaction patterns in cooperating small groups]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 26, 92–106.Google Scholar

Belar, C. D., & Perry, N. W. (1992). The National Conference on Scientist-Practitioner education and training for the professional practice of psychology. American Psychologist, 47(1), 71–75. Retrieved February 22, 2016, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.47.1.71CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Berra, Y. (with Kaplan, D. H.) (2003). What time is it? You mean now? Advice for life from the Zennest Master of them all. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Berra, Y. (with Kaplan, D. H.) (2008). You can observe a lot by watching. What I’ve learned about teamwork from the Yankees and life. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Black, M. P., Katsamanis, A., Baucom, B. R., Lee, C-C., Lammert, A. C., Christensen, A., … Narayanan, S. S. (2013). Toward automating a human behavioral coding system for married couples’ interactions using speech acoustic features. Speech Communication, 55, 1–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2011.12.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonito, J. A., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1997). Participation in small groups. In Burleson, B. R. (Ed.), Communication yearbook 20 (pp. 227–261). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Brauner, E. (1998). Die Qual der Wahl am Methodenbuffet—oder: Wie der Gegenstand nach der passenden Methode sucht [Tough choices at the methods buffet—or: How a construct is searching for the appropriate method]. In Ardelt, E., Lechner, H., & Schloegl, W. (Eds.), Neue Gruppendynamik. Theorie und Praxis, Anspruch und Wirklichkeit [New Group dynamics. Theory and practice, desiderata and reality] (S. 176–193). Göttingen, Germany: Verlag für Angewandte Psychologie.Google Scholar

Brauner, E., & Orth, B. (2002). Strukturen von Argumentationssequenzen in Gruppen [Structures of sequences of argumentation in groups]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 33, 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1024//0044-3514.33.2.65CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bühler, K. (1934/1982). Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. [Language theory: The representative function of language]. Stuttgart, Germany: Fischer.Google Scholar

Burgoon, J. K., & Baesler, E. J. (1991). Choosing between micro and macro nonverbal measurement: Application to selected vocalic and kinesic indices. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 15, 57–78. doi:10.1007/BF00997767CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cheng, A., Kessler, D., Mackinnon, R., Chang, T. P., Nadkarni, V. M., Hunt, E. A., … Auerbach, M. (2016). Reporting guidelines for health care simulation research: Extensions to the CONSORT and STROBE statements. BMJ Simulation and Technology Enhanced Learning, 2(3), 51–60. doi:10.1136/bmjstel-2016-000124CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cicourel, A. V. (1985). Text and discourse. Annual Review of Anthropology, 14, 159–185. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.14.100185.001111CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cicourel, A. V. (1987). The interpretation of communicative contexts: Examples from medical encounters. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(2), 217–226. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2786753CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cicourel, A. V. (1985). Text and discourse. Annual Review of Anthropology, 14, 159–185. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.14.100185.001111CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In Resnick, L. B., Levine, J. M., & Teasley, S. D. (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127–149). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coan, J. A., & Gottman, J. M. (2007). The specific affect coding system (SPAFF). In Coan, J. A. & Allen, J. J. B. (Eds.), Handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment (pp. 106–123). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duck, S., & Montgomery, B. M. (1991). The interdependence among interaction substance, theory, and methods. In Montgomery, B. M. & Duck, S. (Eds.), Studying interpersonal interaction (pp. 3–15). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar

Eden, C. (2004). Analyzing cognitive maps to help structure issues or problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 159, 673–686. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00431-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edmondson, A. C., & McManus, S. E. (2007). Methodological fit in management field research. The Academy of Management Review, 32, 1155–1179. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.26586086CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. (1978). The facial action coding system. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar

Faßnacht, G. (1982). Theory and practice of observing behavior (C. Bryant, Trans.). London, UK: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. New York, NY: Harper.Google Scholar

Grice, P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Heatherington, L., & Friedlander, M. L. (2004). From dyads to triads, and beyond: Relational control in individual and family therapy. In Rogers, L. E. & Escudero, V. (Eds.), Relational communication: An interactional perspective to the study of process and form (pp. 103–129). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Heine, S. J. (2011). Cultural psychology (2nd Ed.). New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar

Hewes, D. E. (1979). The sequential analysis of social interaction. The Quarterly Journal of Speech, 65, 56–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00335637909383458CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 39–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0401_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kolbe, M., Strack, M., Stein, A., & Boos, M. (2011). Effective coordination in human group decision making: MICRO-CO: A micro-analytical taxonomy for analysing explicit coordination mechanisms in decision-making groups. In Boos, M., Kolbe, M., Kappeler, P. M., & Ellwart, T. (Eds.), Coordination in human and primate groups (pp. 199–219). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krauss, R. M. (1987). The role of the listener: Addressee influences on message formulation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 6, 81–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0261927X8700600201CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd edn.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Laing, R. D., Phillipson, H., & Lee, A. R. (1966). Interpersonal perception. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar

Lewin, K. (1969). Grundzuege der topologischen Psychologie [Principles of topological psychology]. Bern: Huber.Google Scholar

Lindahl, K. M. (2009). Coding systems for observing interaction. In Reis, H. T. & Sprecher, S. (Eds.) Encyclopedia of human relationships (pp. 219–222). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Lindahl, K. M., & Malik, N. M. (2000). System for coding interactions and family functioning (SCIFF): A coding system for family problem discussions. Available at http://www.psy.miami.edu/faculty/klindahl/Google Scholar

Maisel, N. C., Gable, S. L., & Strachman, A. (2008). Responsive behaviors in good times and bad. Personal Relationships, 15, 317–338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2008.00201.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

McGrath, J. E., & Altermatt, T. W. (2003). Observation and analysis of group interaction over time: Some methodological and strategic choices. In Hogg, M. A. & Tindale, S. (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes (pp. 525–556). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Mead, G. H. (1934/1967). Mind, self, and society. From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

McGrath, J. E., & Tschan, F. (2004). Temporal matters in social psychology: Examining the role of time in the lives of groups and individuals. Washington, DC: APA Publications.Google Scholar

Michell, J. (1990). An introduction to the logic of psychological measurement. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Nöth, W. (1995). Handbook of semiotics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Poole, M. S., & Hewes, D. E. (2017). Reliability and validity in the measurement of social interaction. In VanLear, C. A. & Canary, D. J. (Eds.), Researching interactive communication behavior. A sourcebook of methods and measures (pp. 217–233). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quine, W. V. (1960/2013). Word and object. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Reis, H. T., Clark, M. S., & Holmes, J. G. (2004). Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing construct in the study of intimacy and closeness. In Mashek, D. J. & Aron, A. P. (Eds.), Handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 201–225). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Salas, E., Paige, J. T., & Rosen, M. A. (2013). Creating new realities in healthcare: the status of simulation-based training as a patient safety improvement strategy. BMJ Quality & Safety, 22(6), 449–452. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002112CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Saldana, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar

Schober, M. F., & Clark, H. H. (1989). Understanding by addressees and overhearers. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 211–232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(89)90008-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schulz von Thun, F. (1981/1994). Miteinander Reden 1. Störungen und Klärungen. Allgemeine Psychologie der Kommunikation [Talking to each other 1. Disruptions and clarifications. General psychology of communication]. Reinbek bei Hamburg, Germany: Rowohlt.Google Scholar

Sillars, A. (1991). Behavioral observation. In Montgomery, B. M. & Duck, S. (Eds.), Studying interpersonal interaction (pp. 197–218). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar

Sillars, A. L., & Overall, N. C. (2017). Coding observed interaction. In VanLear, C. A. & Canary, D. J. (Eds.), Researching interactive communication behavior. A sourcebook of methods and measures (pp. 199–215). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stevens, S. S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, 103, 677–680. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.103.2684.677CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Stiles, W. B. (1981). Classification of intersubjective illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 10(2), 227–249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500008654CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stiles, W. B. (1992). Describing talk: A taxonomy of Verbal Response Modes. Newbury, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Swaab, R. I., Schaerer, M., Anicich, E. M., Ronay, R., & Galinsky, A. D. (2014). The too-much-talent effect: Team interdependence determines when more talent is too much or not enough. Psychological Science, 25(8), 1581–1591. doi:10.1177/0956797614537280CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tannen, D., & Wallat, C. (1987). Interactive frames and knowledge schemas in interaction: Examples from a medical examination/interview. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(2), 205–216. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2786752CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tomasello, M. (2000). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 675–735. doi:10.1017/S0140525X05000129CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Trujillo, N. (1986). Toward a taxonomy of small group interaction-coding systems. Small Group Behavior, 17(4), 371–394. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/104649648601700401CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tschan, F. (2002). Ideal cycles of communication (or cognitions) in triads, dyads, and individuals. Small Group Research, 33, 615–643. doi:10.1177/1046496402238618CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Salas, E., Maurino, D., & Curtis, M. (2010). Human factors in aviation: An overview. In Salas, E. & Marino, D. (Eds.), Human factors in aviation (2nd edn., pp. 3–19). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Watzlawick, P. & Beavin, J. (1967). Some formal aspects of communication. American Behavioral Scientist, 10(8), 4–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002764201000802CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J., & Jackson, D. D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication. A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar

Weingart, L. R. (1997). How did they do that? The ways and means of studying group processes. Research in Organizational Behavior, 19, 189–239.Google Scholar

Wilson, N. L. (1959). Substances without substrata. The Review of Metaphysics, 12(4), 521–539.Google Scholar

Annett, J. (2003). Hierarchical task analysis. In Hollnagel, E. (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive task design (Vol. 2, pp. 17–35). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. doi:10.1201/9781410607775CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Annett, J., Cunningham, D., & Mathias-Jones, P. (2000). A method for measuring team skills. Ergonomics, 43(8), 1076–1094. doi:10.1080/00140130050084888CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bakeman, R. (2000). Behavioral observation and coding. In Reis, H. T. & Judd, C. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 138–159). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511527685CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis; a method for the study of small groups. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Ballard, D. I., Tschan, F., & Waller, M. J. (2008). All in the timing – Considering time at multiple stages of group research. Small Group Research, 39(3), 328–351. doi:10.1177/1046496408317036CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brett, J., Weingart, L., & Olekalns, M. (2004). Baubles, bangles, and beads: Modeling the evolution of negotiating groups over time. In Neale, M. A., Mannix, E. A., & Bloung-Lyons, S. (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams: Time in groups (Vol. 6, pp. 39–64). New York, NY: Elsevier Science Press. doi:S0738-3991(02)00012-5/S1534-0856(03)06003-1Google Scholar

Carr, L. J. (1929). Experimental sociology: A preliminary note on theory and method. Social Forces, 8, 63–74. doi:10.2307/2570053CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chorney, J. M., McMurtry, C. M., Chambers, C. T., & Bakeman, R. (2015). Developing and modifying behavioral coding schemes in pediatric psychology: a practical guide. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 40(1), 154–164. doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsu099CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cristancho, S. M., Apramian, T., Vanstone, M., Lingard, L., Ott, M., & Novick, R. J. (2013). Understanding clinical uncertainty: What is going on when experienced surgeons are not sure what to do? Academic Medicine, 88(10), 1516–1521. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182a3116fCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donohue, W. A., Diez, M. E., & Hamilton, M. (1984). Coding Naturalistic Negotiation Interaction. Human Communication Research, 10(3), 403–425. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1984.tb00025.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Filsinger, E. E. (1983). Choices among marital observation coding systems. Family Process, 22(3), 317–335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1983.00317.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Futoran, G. C., Kelly, J. R., & McGrath, J. E. (1989). Tempo – a Time-Based System for Analysis of Group-Interaction Process. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10(3), 211–232. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp1003_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gollwitzer, P. M. (2012). Mindset theory of action phases. In van Lange, P. A., Kruglanski, A. W., & Higgins, E. T. (Eds.), Handbook of Theories in Social Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 526–545). Los Angeles, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781446249215.n26CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gurtner, A., Tschan, F., Semmer, N. K., & Nägele, C. (2007). Getting groups to develop good strategies: Effects of reflexivity interventions on team process, team performance, and shared mental models. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102(2), 127–142. doi:S0738-3991(02)00012-5/j.obhdp.2006.05.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guzzo, R. A., Wagner, D. B., Maguire, E., Herr, B., & Hawley, C. (1986). Implicit theories and the evaluation of group-process and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37(2), 279–295. doi:S0738-3991(02)00012-5/0749-5978(86)90056-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hackman, J. R., & Morris, C. G. (1975). Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 8, 45–99. doi:S0738-3991(02)00012-5/S0065-2601(08)60248-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Healey, A. N., Sevdalis, N., & Vincent, C. A. (2006). Measuring intra-operative interference from distraction and interruption observed in the operating theatre. Ergonomics, 49(5–6), 589–604. doi:10.1080/00140130600568899CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hirokawa, R. Y. (1983). Group communication and problem-solving effectiveness: An investigation of group phases. Human Communication Research, 9(4), 291–305. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1983.tb00700.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunziker, S., Buhlmann, C., Tschan, F., Balestra, G., Legeret, C., Schumacher, C., Semmer, N. K., Hunziker, P., & Marsch, S. (2010). Brief leadership instructions improve cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a high-fidelity simulation: A randomized controlled trial. Critical Care Medicine, 38(4), 1086–1091. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181cf7383CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an Introduction. In Lerner, G. H. (Ed.), Conversation Analysis. Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–23). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. doi:10.1075/pbns.125.02jefCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kauffeld, S., & Lehmann-Willenbrock, N. (2011). Meetings matter: Effects of team meetings on team and organizational success. Small Group Research, 43(2), 130–158. doi:10.1177/1046496411429599CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keller, S., Tschan, F., Beldi, G., Kurmann, A., Candinas, D., & Semmer, N. K. (2016). Noise peaks influence communication in the operating room. An observational study. Ergonomics, 59(12), 1541–1552. doi:10.1080/00140139.2016.1159736CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kerr, N. L. (2010). Group task. In Levine, J. M. & Hogg, M. A. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Group Processes & Intergroup Relations (pp. 385–390). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781412972017.n116Google Scholar

Kerr, N. L., Aronoff, J., & Messé, L. A. (2000). Methods of small group research. In Reis, H. T. & Judd, C. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 160–189). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511996481.013Google Scholar

Koeszegi, S. T., & Vetschera, R. (2010). Analysis of negotiation processes. In Kilgour, D. M. & Eden, C. (Eds.), Handbook of group decision and negotiation (pp. 121–138). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9097-3_8CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kolbe, M., Künzle, B., Zala Mezö, E., Wacker, J., & Grote, G. (2009). Measuring coordination behavior in anaesthesia teams during induction of general anaesthetics. In Flin, R. & Mitchell, L. (Eds.), Safer surgery: Analysing behavior in the operating theatre (pp. 203–221). London, UK: Ashgate. doi:10.7748/nm.17.8.9.s12Google Scholar

Lingard, L., Espin, S., Whyte, S., Regehr, G., Baker, G. R., Reznick, R., Bohnen, J., Orser, B., Doran, D., & Grober, E. (2004). Communication failures in the operating room: An observational classification of recurrent types and effects. Quality and Safety in Healthcare, 13(5), 330–334. doi:10.1136/qshc.2003.008425CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lingard, L., Reznick, R., Espin, S., Regehr, G., & DeVito, I. (2002). Team communications in the operating room: Talk patterns, sites of tension, and implications for novices. Academic Medicine, 77(3), 232–237. doi:10.1097/00001888-200203000-00013CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 356–376. doi:10.2307/259182CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

McGrath, J. E., & Altermatt, W. T. (2001). Observation and analysis of group interaction over time: Some methodological and strategic consequences. In Hogg, M. A. & Tindale, R. S. (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes (pp. 525–556). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers. doi:10.1002/9780470998458CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGrath, J. E., & Tschan, F. (2004). Dynamics in groups and teams: Groups as complex action systems. In Poole, M. S. & van de Ven, A. H. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational change and development (pp. 50–73). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meyers, R. A., & Seibold, D. R. (2012). Coding group interaction. In Hollingshead, A. B. & Pool, M. S. (Eds.), Research methods for studying groups and teams, a guide to approaches, tools, and technologies (pp. 329–357). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Meyers, R. A., Seibold, D. R., & Brashers, D. (1991). Argument in initial group decision‐making discussions: Refinement of a coding scheme and a descriptive quantitative analysis. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 55(1), 47–68. doi:10.1080/10570319109374370CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morris, C. G. (1966). Task effects on group interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4(5), 545–554. doi:10.1037/h0023897CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Poole, M. S. (2009). Decision development in small groups II: A study of multiple sequences in decision making. Communication Monographs, 50(3), 206–232. doi:10.1080/03637758309390165CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ray, R. D., Ray, J. M., Eckerman, D. A., Milkosky, L. M., & Gillins, L. J. (2011). Operations analysis of behavioral observation procedures: A taxonomy for modeling in an expert training system. Behavior Research Methods, 43(3), 616–634. doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0140-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roter, D., & Larson, S. (2002). The Roter interaction analysis system (RIAS): Utility and flexibility for analysis of medical interactions. Patient Education and Counseling, 46(4), 243–251. https://doi.org/S0738-3991(02)00012-5/S0738-3991(02)00012-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Seelandt, J. C., Tschan, F., Keller, S., Beldi, G., Jenni, N., Kurmann, A., Candinas, D., & Semmer, N. K. (2014). Assessing distractors and teamwork during surgery: Developing an event-based method for direct observation. BMJ Quality & Safety, 23(11), 918–929. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2014-002860CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Stanton, N. A. (2006). Hierarchical task analysis: developments, applications, and extensions. Applied Ergonomics, 37(1), 55–79. doi:S0738-3991(02)00012-5/j.apergo.2005.06.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Staw, B. M. (1975). Attribution of the “causes” of performance: A general alternative interpretation of cross-sectional research on organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 414–432. doi:S0738-3991(02)00012-5/0030-5073(75)90060-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tschan, F. (1995). Communication enhances small group performance if it conforms to task requirements: The concept of ideal communication cycles. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17(3), 371–393. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1703_6CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tschan, F. (2002). Ideal cycles of communication (or cognitions) in triads, dyads, and individuals. Small Group Research, 33(6), 615–643. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496402238618CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tschan, F., Seelandt, J., Keller, S., Semmer, N. K., Kurmann, A., Candinas, D., & Beldi, G. (2015). Impact of case-relevant and case-irrelevant communication within the surgical team on surgical site infection. British Journal of Surgery, 102(13), 1718–25. doi:10.1002/bjs.9927CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tschan, F., Semmer, N. K., Hunziker, P., & Marsch, S. (2011). Decisive action vs. joint deliberation: Different medical tasks imply different coordination requirements. In Duffy, V. G. (Ed.), Advances in human factors and ergonomics in healthcare (pp. 191–200). Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis. doi:10.1201/EBK1439834978Google Scholar

Tschan, F., Semmer, N. K., Hunziker, S., & Marsch, S. U. (2012). Group research using high-fidelity experimental simulations. In Hollingshead, A. B. & Poole, M. S. (Eds.), Research methods for studying groups and teams: A guide to approaches, tools, and technologies (pp. 58–78). New York, NY: Routledge. doi:10.1177/1046496412473662Google Scholar

Tschan, F., Semmer, N. K., Nägele, C., & Gurtner, A. (2000). Task adaptive behavior and performance in groups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 3(4), 367–386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1368430200003004003CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tschan, F., Semmer, N. K., Vetterli, M., Gurtner, A., Hunziker, S., & Marsch, S. U. (2011). Developing observational categories for group process research based on task and coordination-requirement analysis: Examples from research on medical emergency-driven teams. In Boos, M., Kolbe, M., Kappeler, P., & Ellwart, T. (Eds.), Coordination in Human and Primate Groups (pp. 93–115). Berlin, Germany: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15355-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tschan, F., Vetterli, M., Semmer, N. K., Hunziker, S., & Marsch, S. C. (2011). Activities during interruptions in cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A simulator study. Resuscitation, 82(11), 1419–1423. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.06.023CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tschan, F., & von Cranach, M. (1996). Group task structure, processes and outcome. In West, M. (Ed.), Handbook of work group psychology (pp. 95–121). Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar

Waller, M. J. (1999). The timing of adaptive group responses to nonroutine events. Academy of Management Journal, 42(2), 127–137. doi:10.2307/257088CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waller, M. J., & Kaplan, S. A. (2016). Systematic behavioral observation for emergent team phenomena: Key considerations for quantitative video-based approaches. Organizational Research Methods, 21(2), 1–16. doi:10.1177/1094428116647785CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weingart, L., Olekalns, M., & Smith, P. L. (2004). Quantitative coding of negotiation behavior. International Negotiation, 9, 441–455. doi:10.1163/1571806053498805CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weingart, L. R. (1992). Impact of group goals, task component complexity, effort, and planning on group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(5), 682–693. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.77.5.682CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weingart, L. R. (1997). How did they do that? The ways and means of studying group processes. In Cummings, L. L. & Staw, B. M. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 19, pp. 189–239). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar

Weldon, E., Jehn, K. A., & Pradhan, P. (1991). Processes that mediate the relationship between a group goal and improved group performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(4), 555–569. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.4.555CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Yoder, P. J., & Symons, F. J. (2010). Observational measurement of behavior. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar

Yule, S., Flin, R., Maran, N., Rowley, D., Youngson, G., & Paterson-Brown, S. (2008). Surgeons’ non-technical skills in the operating room: Reliability testing of the NOTSS behavior rating system. World Journal of Surgery, 32(4), 548–556. doi:10.1007/s00268-007-9320-zCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Auld, F. Jr., & White, A. M. (1956). Rules for dividing interviews into sentences. The Journal of Psychology, 42(2), 273–281. doi:10.1080/00223980.1956.9713040CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bakeman, R. (2000). Behavioral observation and coding. In Reis, H. T. & Judd, C. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 138–159). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1986). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bakeman, R., Quera, V., & Gnisci, A. (2009). Observer agreement for timed-event sequential data: A comparison of time-based and event-based algorithms. Behavior Research Methods, 41(1), 137–147. doi:10.3758/brm.41.1.137CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis. A method for the study of small groups. Addison-Wesley Press Inc. Retrieved February 16, 2018, from https://archive.org/stream/interactionproce00baleGoogle Scholar

Berg, D. M. (1967). A thematic approach to the analysis of the task-oriented, small group. Communication Studies, 18(4), 285–291. doi:10.1080/10510976709362891Google Scholar

Berkowitz, M. W., & Gibbs, J. C. (1983). Measuring the developmental features of moral discussion. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29(4), 399–410.Google Scholar

Biber, D. (1991). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bilandzic, H., Koschel, F., & Scheufele, B. (2001). Theoretisch-heuristische Segmentierung im Prozeß der empiriegeleiteten Kategorienbildung. In Wirth, W. & Lauf, E. (Eds.), Inhaltsanalyse (pp. 98–116). Köln, Germany: Herbert von Halem Verlag.Google Scholar

The British National Corpus. (2007). (Version 3, BNC XML Edition). JA6. Retrieved using BNCweb (CQP-edition), Lancaster University Computing Services, Lancaster, from http://bncweb.lancs.ac.ukGoogle Scholar

Burtscher, M. J., Kolbe, M., Wacker, J., & Manser, T. (2011). Interactions of team mental models and monitoring behaviors predict team performance in simulated anesthesia inductions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17(3), 257–269. doi:10.1037/a0025148Google ScholarPubMed

Chi, M. T. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(3), 271–315. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0603_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conroy, R. (2001). Spatial navigation in immersive virtual environments. University College London, London.Google Scholar

Crookes, G. (1990). The utterance, and other basic units for second language discourse analysis. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 183–199. doi:10.1093/applin/11.2.183CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dollard, J., & Auld, F. Jr. (1959). Scoring human motives: A manual. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Downing, A. (2015). English grammar: A university course (3rd edn.). Abingdon, UK, and New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Duncan, S. Jr (1975). Interaction units during speaking turns in dyadic, face-to-face conversations. In Kendon, A., Harris, R. M., & Key, M. R. (Eds.), Organization of Behavior in Face-to-Face Interaction (pp. 199–214). The Hague & Paris: Mouton Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Faßnacht, G. (1995). Systematische Verhaltensbeobachtung: Eine Einführung in die Methologie und Praxis [Systematic behavioral observation: An introduction into the methodology and practice] (2nd ed.). Munich: Reinhardt.Google Scholar

Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G. (2000). Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 354–375. doi:10.1093/applin/21.3.354CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gale, N. K., Heath, G., Cameron, E., Rashid, S., & Redwood, S. (2013). Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13(117), 1–8. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-11CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gamsky, N. R., & Farwell, G. F. (1966). Counselor verbal behavior as a function of client hostility. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 13(2), 184–190. doi:10.1037/h0023397CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gottman, J. M. (1979). Marital interaction: Experimental investigations. New York, NY: Academic Press, Inc.Google Scholar

Greenbaum, S., & Nelson, G. (2002). An introduction to English grammar (2nd edn.). Harlow, UK: Longman.Google Scholar

Guetzkow, H. (1950). Unitizing and categorizing problems in coding qualitative data. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 6(1), 47–58. doi:10.1002/1097-4679(195001)6:1%3C47::AID-JCLP2270060111%3E3.0.CO;2-I3.0.CO;2-I>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hatfield, J. D., & Weider‐Hatfield, D. (1978). The comparative utility of three types of behavioral units for interaction analysis. Communications Monographs, 45(1), 44–50. doi:10.1080/03637757809375950CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herbst, T., Heath, D., Roe, I. F., & Götz, D. (2004). A valency dictionary of English: A corpus-based analysis of the complementation patterns of English verbs, nouns and adjectives (Vol. 40). Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hiltz, S. R., Johnson, K., & Turoff, M. (1986). Experiments in group decision making communication process and outcome in face‐to‐face versus computerized conferences. Human Communication Research, 13(2), 225–252. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1986.tb00104.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirokawa, R. Y. (1988). Group communication research: Considerations for the use of interaction analysis. In Tardy, C. H. (Ed.), A handbook for the study of human communication: Methods and instruments for observing, measuring, and assessing communication processes (pp. 229–245). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar

Holmes, J. (1987). Hedging, fencing and other conversational gambits: An analysis of gender differences in New Zealand speech. In Pauwels, A. (Ed.), Women and language in Australian and New Zealand society (pp. 59–79). Sydney, Australia: Australian Professional Publications.Google Scholar

Huddleston, R. (1984). Introduction to the grammar of English. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. K. (2008). The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kasper, G. (1998). Analysing verbal protocols. Tesol Quarterly, 32(2), 358–362. doi:10.2307/3587591CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keyton, J., & Beck, S. J. (2009). The influential role of relational messages in group interaction. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 13(1), 14–30. doi:10.1037/a0013495CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klonek, F. E., Quera, V., & Kauffeld, S. (2015). Coding interactions in Motivational Interviewing with computer-software: What are the advantages for process researchers? Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 284–292. doi:org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.034CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klonek, F. E., Quera, V., Burba, M., & Kauffeld, S. (2016). Group interactions and time: Using sequential analysis to study group dynamics in project meetings. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 20(3), 209–222. doi:10.1037/gdn0000052CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kolbe, M., Boos, M., Stein, A., & Strack, M. (2016). SYNSEG–Eine Methode zur syntaxgeleiteten Segmentierung von Kodiereinheiten für die Analyse von Gruppenprozessen. Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie (GIO), 47(4), 335–344. doi:10.1007/s11612-016-0345-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kramer, M. W., Kuo, C. L., & Dailey, J. C. (1997). The impact of brainstorming techniques on subsequent group processes: Beyond generating ideas. Small Group Research, 28(2), 218–242. doi:10.1177/1046496497282003CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krippendorff, K. (1981). Content analysis. An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills, CA, and London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar

Kvale, S. (1988). The 1000-page question. Phenomenology + Pedagogy, 6(2), 90–106.Google Scholar

Langdridge, D., & Hagger-Johnson, G. (2009). Introduction to research methods and data analysis in psychology (2nd edn.). Harlow, UK: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar

Leech, G. (2000). Grammars of spoken English: New outcomes of corpus‐oriented research. Language Learning, 50(4), 675–724. doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00143CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., Allen, J. A., & Meinecke, A. L. (2014). Observing culture: Differences in US-American and German team meeting behaviors. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17(2), 252–271. doi:10.1177/1368430213497066CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., Meinecke, A. L., Rowold, J., & Kauffeld, S. (2015). How transformational leadership works during team interactions: A behavioral process analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(6), 1017–1033. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.07.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levenshtein, V. I. (1966). Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions and reversals. Soviet Physics-Doklady, 10(8), 707–710.Google Scholar

Magnusson, M. S. (1996). Hidden real-time patterns in intra-and inter-individual behavior: description and detection. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 12(2), 112–123. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.12.2.112CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayring, P. (2003). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken (8th edn.). Weinheim and Basel, Switzerland: UTB.Google Scholar

Murphy, M. L., & Koskela, A. (2010). Key terms in semantics. London, UK, and New York, NY: Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar

Oh, H. J., Myaeng, S. H., & Jang, M. G. (2007). Semantic passage segmentation based on sentence topics for question answering. Information Sciences, 177(18), 3696–3717. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2007.02.038CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olson, W. C., & Cunningham, E. M. (1934). Time-sampling techniques. Child Development, 5(1), 41–58. doi:10.2307/1125795Google Scholar

Poland, B. D. (1995). Transcription quality as an aspect of rigor in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 1(3), 290–310. doi:10.1177/107780049500100302CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quera, V., Bakeman, R., & Gnisci, A. (2007). Observer agreement for event sequences: Methods and software for sequence alignment and reliability estimates. Behavior Research Methods, 39(1), 39–49. doi:10.3758/bf03192842CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Riethmüller, M., Fernandez Castelao, E., Eberhardt, D., Timmermann, A., & Boos, M. (2012). Adaptive coordination development in student anaesthesia teams: A longitudinal study. Ergonomics, 55(1), 55–68. doi:10.1080/00140139.2011.636455CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rosenberg, H., & Bonoma, T. V. (1974). A social influence rating method for group interaction and some pilot results on group therapy process. Proceedings of the Division of Personality and Society Psychology, 1(1), 259–262. doi:10.1177/014616727400100188CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Russell, R. L., & Staszewski, C. (1988). The unit problem: Some systematic distinction and critical dilemmas for psychotherapy process research. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 25(2), 191–200. doi:10.1037/h0085333CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Srnka, K. J., & Koeszegi, S. (2007). From words to numbers: how to transform qualitative data into meaningful quantitative results. Schmalenbach Business Review, 59, 29–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stiles, W. B. (1992). Describing talk: A taxonomy of verbal response modes. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Stinson, C. H., Milbrath, C., Reidbord, S. P., & Bucci, W. (1994). Thematic segmentation of psychotherapy transcripts for convergent analyses. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 31(1), 36–48. doi:10.1037/0033-3204.31.1.36CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R. L., Prins, F. J., & Jochems, W. M. (2006). Content analysis: What are they talking about? Computers & Education, 46(1), 29–48. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tschan, F., Rochat, S., & Zapf, D. (2005). It’s not only clients: Studying emotion work with clients and co-workers with an event-sampling approach. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78(2), 195–220. doi:10.1348/096317905X39666CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tschan, F., Seelandt, J. C., Keller, S., Semmer, N. K., Kurmann, A., Candinas, D., & Beldi, G. (2015). Impact of case-relevant and case-irrelevant communication within the surgical team on surgical-site infection. British Journal of Surgery, 102(13), 1718–1725. doi:10.1002/bjs.9927CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van Hooff, J. A. R. A. M. (1982). Categories and sequences of behavior: Methods of description and analysis. In Scherer, K. R. & Ekman, P. (Eds.), Handbook of methods in nonverbal behavior research (pp. 362–439). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Waller, M. J. (1999). The timing of adaptive group responses to nonroutine events. Academy of Management Journal, 42(2), 127–137. doi:10.2307/257088CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Atkinson, P., Coffey, A., Delamont, S., Lofland, J., & Lofland, L. (2001). Handbook of Ethnography. London, UK: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakeman, R., Deckner, D. F., & Quera, V. (2005). Analysis of behavioral streams. In Teti, D. M. (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in developmental science (pp. 394–420). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakeman, R., & Quera, V. (2011). Sequential analysis and observational methods for the behavioral sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small groups. Oxford, UK: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Bornstein, R. F. (1993). Mere exposure effects with outgroup stimuli. In Mackie, D. & Hamilton, D. (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 195–211). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, R. D., & Hauenstein, N. M. (2005). Interrater agreement reconsidered: An alternative to the rwg indices. Organizational Research Methods, 8(2), 165–184. doi:10.1177/1094428105275376CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carthey, J., de Leval, M. R., Wright, D. J., Farewell, V. T., & Reason, J. T. (2003). Behavioural markers of surgical excellence. Safety Science, 41(5), 409–425. doi:10.1016/S0925-7535(01)00076-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6(4), 284–290. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cicchetti, D. V., & Feinstein, A. R. (1990). High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 43(6), 551–558. doi:10.1016/0895-4356(90)90159-MCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Clayton, M. J. (1997). Delphi: A technique to harness expert opinion for critical decision‐making tasks in education. Educational Psychology, 17(4), 373–386. doi:10.1080/0144341970170401CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychosocial Measurement, 20, 37–46. doi:10.1177/001316446002000104CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cook, D. A., & Beckman, T. J. (2006). Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application. The American Journal of Medicine, 119(2), 166.e7–166.e16. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.10.036CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Craig, R. T. (1981). Generalization of Scott’s index of intercoder agreement. Public Opinion Quarterly, 45(2), 260–264. doi:10.1086/268657CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crossley, J., Marriott, J., Purdie, H., & Beard, J. (2011). Prospective observational study to evaluate NOTSS (Non-Technical Skills for Surgeons) for assessing trainees’ non‐technical performance in the operating theatre. British Journal of Surgery, 98(7), 1010–1020. doi:10.1002/bjs.7478CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cunningham, W. A., Preacher, K. J., & Banaji, M. R. (2001). Implicit attitude measures: Consistency, stability, and convergent validity. Psychological Science, 12(2), 163–170. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00328CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dooley, K. (2001). Social research methods (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes (2nd edn.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feinstein, A. R., & Cicchetti, D. V. (1990). High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 43(6), 543–549. doi:10.1016/0895-4356(90)90158-LCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fleiss, J. L. (1971). Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin, 76(5), 378–382. doi:10.1037/h0031619CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 8(4), 597–606.Google Scholar

Hallgren, K. A. (2012). Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: An overview and tutorial. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 8(1), 23–34. doi:10.20982/tqmp.08.1.p023CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice (3rd edn.). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1(1), 77–89. doi:10.1080/19312450709336664CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howitt, D., & Cramer, D. (2011). Introduction to research methods in psychology (3rd edn.). Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.Google Scholar

Hull, L., Arora, S., Kassab, E., Kneebone, R., & Sevdalis, N. (2011). Observational teamwork assessment for surgery: content validation and tool refinement. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 212(2), 234–243. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.11.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hull, L., Arora, S., Symons, N. R., Jalil, R., Darzi, A., Vincent, C., & Sevdalis, N. (2013). Training faculty in nontechnical skill assessment: National guidelines on program requirements. Annals of Surgery, 258(2), 370–375. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e318279560bCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

IBM. (2013). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corporation.Google Scholar

James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 85–98. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jha, A. S. (2014). Social research methods. New Delhi, India: McGraw Hill Education.Google Scholar

Kline, P. (2015). A handbook of test construction: Introduction to psychometric design. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar

Klonek, F. E., Quera, V., & Kauffeld, S. (2015). Coding interactions in motivational interviewing with computer-software: What are the advantages for process researchers? Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 284–292. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.034CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kolbe, M., Burtscher, M. J., & Manser, T. (2013). Co-ACT – a framework for observing coordination behaviour in acute care teams. BMJ Quality and Safety in Health Care, 22, 596–605. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001319CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kolbe, M., Grote, G., Waller, M. J., Wacker, J., Grande, B., Burtscher, M. J., & Spahn, D. R. (2014). Monitoring and talking to the room: Autochthonous coordination patterns in team interaction and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(6), 1254–1267. doi:10.1037/a0037877CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krippendorff, K. (2004a). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. (2nd edn.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Krippendorff, K. (2004b). Reliability in content analysis: Some common misconceptions and recommendations. Human Communication Research, 30(3), 411–433. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00738.xGoogle Scholar

Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174. doi:10.2307/2529310CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 815–852. doi:10.1177/1094428106296642CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., Meinecke, A. L., Rowold, J., & Kauffeld, S. (2015). How transformational leadership works during team interactions: A behavioral process analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(6), 1017–1033. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.07.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mangold. (2014). INTERACT Benutzerhandbuch. Mangold International GmbH (Hrsg.). Retrieved February 16, 2018, from www.mangold-international.com/de/Google Scholar

Martin, P., & Bateson, P. (2007). Measuring behavior, an introductory guide. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGrath, J. E., & Altermatt, T. W. (1999). Observation and analysis of group interaction over time: Some methodological and strategic choices. In Hogg, M. & Tindale, R. (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes (pp. 525–556). London, UK: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar

McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276–282. doi:10.11613/BM.2012.031CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Newman, I., & Newman, C. (1994). Conceptual statistics for beginners. Lanham, MA: University Press of America.Google Scholar

Researchware. (2002). HyperRESEARCH. Randolph, MA: ResearchWare, Inc.Google Scholar

Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom. The Urban Review, 3(1), 16–20. doi:10.1007/BF02322211CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmutz, J., & Manser, T. (2013). Do team processes really have an effect on clinical performance? A systematic literature review. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 110, 529–544. doi:10.1093/bja/aes513CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Scott, W. A. (1955). Reliability of content analysis: The case of nominal scale coding. Public Opinion Quarterly, 19(3), 321–325. doi:10.1086/266577CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Seelandt, J. C., Tschan, F., Keller, S., Beldi, G., Jenni, N., Kurmann, A., & Semmer, N. K. (2014). Assessing distractors and teamwork during surgery: Developing an event-based method for direct observation. BMJ Quality & Safety in Healthcare, 23, 918–929. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2014-002860CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 420–428. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tinsley, H. E., & Weiss, D. J. (1975). Interrater reliability and agreement of subjective judgments. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 22(4), 358–376. doi:10.1037/h0076640CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tschan, F., Seelandt, J., Keller, S., Semmer, N., Kurmann, A., Candinas, D., & Beldi, G. (2015). Impact of case‐relevant and case‐irrelevant communication within the surgical team on surgical‐site infection. British Journal of Surgery, 102(13), 1718–1725. doi:10.1002/bjs.9927CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weingart, L. R. (1997). How did they do that? Research in Organizational Behavior, 19, 189–239.Google Scholar

Weingart, L. R., Olekalns, M., & Smith, P. L. (2004). Quantitative coding of negotiation behavior. International Negotiation, 9(3), 441–456. doi:10.1163/1571806053498805CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yoder, P., & Symons, F. (2010). Observational measurement of behavior. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar

Yule, S., Flin, R., Maran, N., Rowley, D., Youngson, G., Duncan, J., & Paterson-Brown, S. (2009). Development and evaluation of the NOTTS behavior rating system for intraoperative surgery. In Flin, R. & Mitchell, L. (Eds.), Safer surgery. Analysing behaviour in the operating theatre (pp. 7–26). London, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Yule, S., Flin, R., Paterson-Brown, S., Maran, N., & Rowley, D. (2006). Development of a rating system for surgeons’ non-technical skills. Medical Education, 40(11), 1098–1104. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02610.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Zijlstra, F. R., Waller, M. J., & Phillips, S. I. (2012). Setting the tone: Early interaction patterns in swift-starting teams as a predictor of effectiveness. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21(5), 749–777. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2012.690399CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Altmann, J. (1974). Observational study of behavior: Sampling methods. Behavior, 49, 715–729. doi:10.1163/156853974X00534CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Audiotranskription.de (2014). f4analyse. Software for qualitative text analysis. User manual. Retrieved February 22, 2016, from www.audiotranskription.de/audot/downloadfile.php?k=1&d=29&l=de&c=883a9f6591Google Scholar

Audiotranskription.de (2012). User manual f4. A compact guide on how to use f4. Retrieved February 22, 2016, from www.audiotranskription.de/audot/downloadfile.php?k=1&d=24&l=de&c=e8fa5c88fcGoogle Scholar

Faßnacht, G. (2007). Systematische Verhaltensbeobachtung [Systematic observation of behavior]. Stuttgart, Germany: Reinhardt Verlag.Google Scholar

Free Software Foundation (2016). What is free software? The free software definition. Retrieved January 13, 2017, from www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.en.htmlGoogle Scholar

Glüer, M. (2010, September). Software zur Quantifizierung und Analyse von Videodaten: Ein Überblick über Softwarelösungen [Software for video data analysis: A review of software products]. Paper presented at the 47. Kongress der deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie, Bremen.Google Scholar

Glüer, M. (2012, September). Durchführung eines Time‐Samplings mit ELAN. Workshop zur softwaregestützten Videodatenanalyse – Workshop Unterlagen [Time sampling with ELAN – Workshop materials]. 48. Kongress der deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie, Bielefeld.Google Scholar

Glüer, M. (2013). Geschenkfreude im Kleinkindalter. Eine empirische Studie zur emotionalen Sozialisation von Kleinkindern in einer Geschenksituation [Toddlers’ joy when receiving a gift. An empirical study of toddlers’ emotional socialization in a gift situation]. Hamburg, Germany: Diplomica.Google Scholar

Glüer, M. (2015a). Annotatoren in der Videodatenanalyse: Ein Überblick [Annotation tools for video data analysis. A review; Webpage]. Retrieved January 13, 2017, from www.videodatenanalyse.de/software/annotatorenGoogle Scholar

Glüer, M. (2015b). Eudico Linguistic Annotator (ELAN): Ein vielseitiger Annotator zur Videodatenanalyse [Eudico Linguistic Annotator (ELAN): A multifunctional annotator for video data analysis; Webpage]. Retrieved January 13, 2017, from www.videodatenanalyse.de/software/annotatoren/elanGoogle Scholar

Kipp, M. (n.d.). ANVIL: The video annotation research tool [Webpage]. Retrieved January 13, 2017, from www.anvil-software.org/Google Scholar

Mangold International (2017). Mangold: Software and system solutions for research [Webpage]. Retrieved January 13, 2017, from www.mangold-international.com/en/Google Scholar

Mangold International (2016). INTERACT. User guide. INTERACT version 15.0. Mangold International GmbH.Google Scholar

Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics (n.d.). ELAN [Webpage]. Retrieved January 13, 2017, from http://tla.mpi.nl/tools/tla-tools/elan/Google Scholar

Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics (2017). ELAN – Eudico Linguistic Annotator manual (Version 5.0.0-alpha). Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Retrieved February 13, 2017, from www.mpi.nl/corpus/manuals/manual-elan.pdfGoogle Scholar

Noldus Information Technology (2015). Reference manual. The Observer XT.Google Scholar

Noldus Information Technology (2016). Noldus: Innovative solutions for behavioral research [Webpage]. Retrieved January 13, 2017, from www.noldus.comGoogle Scholar

QSR International (2015). NVivo 11 Plus for Windows. Getting started guide. Retrieved February 22, 2016, from http://redirect.qsrinternational.com/PlusGSG-nv11-en.htmGoogle Scholar

Rimmele, R. (2013). What is Videograph? [Videograph manual]. Retrieved February 22, 2016, from www.dervideograph.de/videograph_en.pdfGoogle Scholar

Scientific Software Development (2015). ATLAS.ti 7. User guide and reference. Retrieved February 22, 2016, from http://downloads.atlasti.com/docs/manual/atlasti_v7_manual_en.pdf?_ga=1.31324732.2076018714.1389556889Google Scholar

Transana – Qualitative analysis software for text, still image, audio, and video data [Webpage]. (n.d.). Retrieved January 13, 2017, from www.transana.com/Google Scholar

VERBIE Software (2016a). MAXQDA: The art of data analysis. MAXQDA 12 reference manual. Retrieved February 22, 2016, from www.maxqda.com/download/manuals/MAX12_manual_eng.pdfGoogle Scholar

VERBIE Software (2016b). MAXQDA: Qualitative data analysis software [Webpage]. Retrieved February 22, 2016, from www.maxqda.com/Google Scholar