Book contents
- The Cambridge Companion to Natural Law Jurisprudence
- Cambridge Companions to Law
- The Cambridge Companion to Natural Law Jurisprudence
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Foundations
- Part II Practical Reason, Normativity and Ethics
- Part III Law
- 10 Law as an Idea We Live By
- 11 The Moral Impact Theory, the Dependence View and Natural Law
- 12 The Ideal Dimension of Law
- 13 Two Unhappy Dilemmas for Natural Law Jurisprudence
- 14 The Common Good
- 15 Natural Law Theory and Constitutionalism
- 16 Opening the Doors of Inquiry: Lon Fuller and the Natural Law Tradition
- Index
- References
12 - The Ideal Dimension of Law
from Part III - Law
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 July 2017
By
Book contents
- The Cambridge Companion to Natural Law Jurisprudence
- Cambridge Companions to Law
- The Cambridge Companion to Natural Law Jurisprudence
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Foundations
- Part II Practical Reason, Normativity and Ethics
- Part III Law
- 10 Law as an Idea We Live By
- 11 The Moral Impact Theory, the Dependence View and Natural Law
- 12 The Ideal Dimension of Law
- 13 Two Unhappy Dilemmas for Natural Law Jurisprudence
- 14 The Common Good
- 15 Natural Law Theory and Constitutionalism
- 16 Opening the Doors of Inquiry: Lon Fuller and the Natural Law Tradition
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Companion to Natural Law Jurisprudence , pp. 314 - 341Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Works Cited
Alexy, R. 1989. A Theory of Legal Argumentation. The Theory of Rational Discourse as Theory of Legal Justification (first publ. 1978), trans. Adler, R. and MacCormick, N.. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Alexy, R. 1997b. ‘Bulygins Kritik des Richtigkeitsarguments.’ In Normative Systems in Legal and Moral Theory. Festschrift for Carlos E. Alchourrón and Eugenio Bulygin, eds. Valdés, E. Garzón, Krawietz, W., von Wright, G.H., and Zimmerling, R.. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot: 235–250Google Scholar
Alexy, R. 2000. ‘On the Thesis of a Necessary Connection Between Law and Morality: Bulygin’s Critique’. Ratio Juris 13: 138–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexy, R. 2002a. The Argument from Injustice. A Reply to Legal Positivism (first pub. 1992), trans. Paulson, S.L. and Paulson, B. Litschewski. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Alexy, R. 2002b. A Theory of Constitutional Rights (first publ. 1985), trans. Rivers, J.. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Alexy, R. 2003. ‘The Nature of Arguments about the Nature of Law’. In: Rights, Culture, and the Law. Themes from the Legal and Political Philosophy of Joseph Raz, eds. Meyer, L.H., Paulson, S.L., and Pogge, T.W.. Oxford University Press: 3–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexy, R. 2006. ‘The Nature of Legal Philosophy’. In Philosophy of Law. Critical Concepts in Philosophy, ed. Bix, B.H.. London and New York: Routledge, vol. I: 21–32Google Scholar
Alexy, R. 2007a. ‘An Answer to Joseph Raz’. In: Law, Rights and Discourse. The Legal Philosophy of Robert Alexy, ed. Pavlakos, G.. Oxford: Hart Publishing: 37–55Google Scholar
Alexy, R. 2007b. ‘The Weight Formula’. In Studies in the Philosophy of Law. Frontiers of the Economic Analysis of Law, eds. Stelmach, J., Brożek, B., and Załuski, W.. Cracow: Jagiellonian University Press: 9–27Google Scholar
Alexy, R. 2008a. ‘On the Concept and the Nature of Law’. Ratio Juris 21: 281–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexy, R. 2008b. ‘A Defence of Radbruch’s Formula’. In Lloyd’s Introduction to Jurisprudence, 8th ed., ed. Freeman, M.D.A.. London: Sweet & Maxwell and Thomson Reuters: 426–443Google Scholar
Alexy, R. 2012. ‘Law, Morality, and the Existence of Human Rights’. Ratio Juris 25: 2–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexy, R. 2013a. ‘Between Positivism and Non-Positivism? A Third Reply to Eugenio Bulygin’. In Neutrality and Theory of Law, eds. Beltrán, J. Ferrer, Moreso, J.J., and Papayannis, D.M.. Dordrecht: Springer: 225–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexy, R. 2013b. ‘Some Reflections on the Ideal Dimension of Law and on the Legal Philosophy of John Finnis’. The American Journal of Jurisprudence 58: 97–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexy, R. 2013c. ‘The Existence of Human Rights’. Archives for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, supplement 136: 9–18Google Scholar
Augustinus, 2006. De libero arbitrio, ed. Brachtendorf, J.. Paderborn: Ferdinand SchöninghGoogle Scholar
Austin, J.L. 1970 ‘A Plea for Excuses’. In: Austin, , Philosophical Papers, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press: 175–204Google Scholar
Beyleveld, D. and Brownsword, R. 2001. Human Dignity in Bioethics and Biolaw. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Bulygin, E. 1993. ‘Alexy und das Richtigkeitsargument’. In Rechtsnorm und Rechtswirklichkeit. Festschrift für Werner Krawietz, eds. Aarnio, A., Paulson, S.L., Weinberger, O., von Wright, G.H., and Wyduckel, D.. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot: 19–24Google Scholar
Bulygin, E. 2000. ‘Alexy’s Thesis of the Necessary Connection between Law and Morality’. Ratio Juris 13: 133–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulygin, E. 2013. ‘Alexy Between Positivism and Non-positivism’. In Neutrality and Theory of Law, eds. Beltrán, J. Ferrer, Moreso, J.J., and Papayannis, D.M.. Dordrecht: Springer: 49–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, J. 2013. ‘Reflections and Responses’. In Reason, Morality, and Law. The Philosophy of John Finnis, eds. Keown, J. and George, R.P.. Oxford University Press: 459–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, J. 2014. ‘Law as Fact and as Reason for Action: A Response to Robert Alexy on Law’s “Ideal Dimension”’, The American Journal of Jurisprudence 59: 85–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. 1996a. Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Pluhar, W.S. and Kitcher, P.. Indianapolis: Hackett PublishingGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. 1996b. The Metaphysics of Morals. Metaphysical First Principles of the Doctrine of Right (first publ. 1797). In: Kant, I.. Practical Philosophy, trans. and ed. Gregor, M.J.. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Kelsen, H. 1967. Pure Theory of Law, 2nd ed. (first publ. 1960), trans. Knight, M.. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radbruch, G. 2006. ‘Statutory Lawlessness and Supra-Statutory Law’ (first publ. 1946), trans. Paulson, B. Litschewski and Paulson, S., Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26: 1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, J. 2003. ‘About Morality and the Nature of Law’. The American Journal of Jurisprudence 48: 1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, J. 2007. ‘The Argument from Justice, or How Not to Reply to Legal Positivism’. In Law, Rights and Discourse. The Legal Philosophy of Robert Alexy, ed. Pavlakos, G.. Oxford: Hart Publishing: 17–35Google Scholar
- 10
- Cited by