Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T01:52:28.153Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Two Unhappy Dilemmas for Natural Law Jurisprudence

from Part III - Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2017

By
Mark C. Murphy
Edited by
George Duke  and
Robert P. George
George Duke
Affiliation:
Deakin University, Victoria
Robert P. George
Affiliation:
Princeton University, New Jersey
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Companion to Natural Law Jurisprudence , pp. 342 - 368
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Alexy, R. 2002. The Argument from Injustice. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, J. 1832/1995. The Province of Jurisprudence Determined. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crowe, J. 2015. ‘Law as an Artifact Kind’. Monash University Law Review 40.Google Scholar
Dickson, J. 2001. Evaluation and Legal Theory. Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. 1982. ‘“Natural” Law Revisited’. University of Florida Law Review 34.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. 1986. Law’s Empire. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D. 2001. ‘Hobbes and the Legitimacy of Law’. Law and Philosophy 20.Google Scholar
Finnis, J. 1980. Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fuller, L. 1964. The Morality of Law. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gardner, J. 2001. ‘Legal Positivism: 5½ Myths’. American Journal of Jurisprudence 46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, R.P. 1996. ‘Preface’ In The Autonomy of Law, ed. George, R.P.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Green, L. 2013. ‘The Morality in Law’ In Reading H. L. A. Hart’s The Concept of Law, eds. d’Almeida, D., Dolcetti, A., and Edwards, J.. Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Greenberg, M. 2004. ‘How Facts Make Law’. Legal Theory 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H.L.A. 1955. ‘Are There Any Natural Rights?’ Philosophical Review 64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H.L.A. 1961/2012. The Concept of Law, 3rd edition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. 1651/1994. Leviathan, ed. Curley, E.. Hackett.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. 1934/2002. Introduction to the Problems of Legal Theory, trans. Paulson, B. L. and Paulson, S. L.. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. 1945/1961. General Theory of Law and State, trans. Wedberg, A.. Russell and Russell.Google Scholar
Leiter, B. 2011. ‘The Demarcation Problem in Jurisprudence: A New Case for Skepticism’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leiter, B. 2016. ‘Why Legal Positivism (Again)?’, University of Chicago Public Law Working Paper No. 442, accessible at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2323013.Google Scholar
Margolis, E. and Laurence, S., eds. 2007. Creations of the Mind: Theories of Artifacts and their Representation. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marmor, A. 1992. Interpretation and Legal Theory. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, M. 1992. ‘Law as a Functional Kind’. In Natural Law Theory: Contemporary Essays, ed. George, R.P.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, M. 2001. ‘Law as Justice’. Social Philosophy and Policy 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, M.C. 1995. ‘Was Hobbes a Legal Positivist?’ Ethics 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, M.C. 2003. ‘Natural Law Jurisprudence’. Legal Theory 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, M.C. 2006. Natural Law in Jurisprudence and Politics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, M.C. 2012. ‘Defect and Deviance in Natural Law Jurisprudence’. In Institutional Reason: The Jurisprudence of Robert Alexy, ed. Klatt, M.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, M.C. 2013. ‘The Explanatory Role of the Weak Natural Law Thesis’. In Philosophical Foundations of the Nature of Law, ed. Waluchow, W. and Sciaraffa, S.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Patterson, D. 2012. ‘Alexy on Necessity in Law and Morals’. Ratio Juris 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, J. 1994. ‘Authority, Law, and Morality’. In Ethics in the Public Domain. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, J. 2004. ‘Can There Be a Theory of Law?’ In Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory eds. Golding, M and Edmundson, W.. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schauer, F. 2012. ‘On the Nature of the Nature of Law’. Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, M. 2007. Slaves of the Passions. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. and Vanderveken, D. 1985. Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, S. 2012. Legality. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Soper, P. 1983. ‘Legal Theory and the Problem of Definition’. University of Chicago Law Review 50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, T. 1996. ‘Knowing and Asserting’. Philosophical Review 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×