Book contents
- Experiments in Public Management Research
- Experiments in Public Management Research
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface and Acknowledgements
- Part I Context
- Part II Methods
- Part III Substantive Contributions
- 8 Work Motivation
- 9 Experimenting with Leadership in Public Organisations
- 10 Prospects for Experimental Approaches to Research on Bureaucratic Red Tape***
- 11 Managerial Use of Performance Data by Bureaucrats and Politicians
- 12 Citizens and Public Performance Measures: Making Sense of Performance Information
- 13 Public Sector Transparency
- 14 Representative Bureaucracy: An Experimental Approach
- 15 Coproduction of Public Services
- 16 Expectations of and Satisfaction with Public Services
- 17 Citizen and Users’ Responses to Public Service Failure: Experimentation about Blame, Exit, and Voice
- 18 Assessing Public Support for Government Policy: Comparing Experimental and Attitudinal Approaches
- 19 Legislative Oversight of the Bureaucracy: Insights from Formal Modelling and Experimental Testing
- 20 Experimental Research for Nonprofit Management: Charitable Giving and Fundraising
- Part IV Issues and Implications
- Appendix Recommended Reporting Guidelines for Experiments in Public Management, a Checklist1
- Index
- References
8 - Work Motivation
from Part III - Substantive Contributions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 July 2017
Book contents
- Experiments in Public Management Research
- Experiments in Public Management Research
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface and Acknowledgements
- Part I Context
- Part II Methods
- Part III Substantive Contributions
- 8 Work Motivation
- 9 Experimenting with Leadership in Public Organisations
- 10 Prospects for Experimental Approaches to Research on Bureaucratic Red Tape***
- 11 Managerial Use of Performance Data by Bureaucrats and Politicians
- 12 Citizens and Public Performance Measures: Making Sense of Performance Information
- 13 Public Sector Transparency
- 14 Representative Bureaucracy: An Experimental Approach
- 15 Coproduction of Public Services
- 16 Expectations of and Satisfaction with Public Services
- 17 Citizen and Users’ Responses to Public Service Failure: Experimentation about Blame, Exit, and Voice
- 18 Assessing Public Support for Government Policy: Comparing Experimental and Attitudinal Approaches
- 19 Legislative Oversight of the Bureaucracy: Insights from Formal Modelling and Experimental Testing
- 20 Experimental Research for Nonprofit Management: Charitable Giving and Fundraising
- Part IV Issues and Implications
- Appendix Recommended Reporting Guidelines for Experiments in Public Management, a Checklist1
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Experiments in Public Management ResearchChallenges and Contributions, pp. 167 - 193Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Amabile, T. M. 1993. ‘Motivational synergy: toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace’, Human Resource Management Review 3(3): 185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A. and Tighe, E. M. 1994. ‘The work preference inventory: assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66(5): 950.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arieli, S., Grant, A. M. and Sagiv, L. 2014. ‘Convincing yourself to care about others: an intervention for enhancing benevolence values’, Journal of Personality 82(1): 15–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ariely, D., Bracha, A. and Meier, S. 2009. ‘Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially’, The American Economic Review 99: 544–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belle, N. 2013. ‘Experimental evidence on the relationship between public service motivation and job performance’, Public Administration Review 73(1): 143–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belle, N. 2015. ‘Performance-related pay and the crowding out of motivation in the public sector: a randomized field experiment’, Public Administration Review 75(2): 230–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belle, N. and Cantarelli, P. 2015. ‘Monetary incentives, motivation, and job effort in the public sector: an experimental study with Italian government executives’, Review of Public Personnel Administration 35(2): 99–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bénabou, R. and Tirole, J. 2006. ‘Incentives and prosocial behavior’, American Economic Review 96(5): 1652–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyne, G. 2002. ‘Public and private management: what’s the difference?’ Journal of Management Studies 39: 97–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyne, G., Meier, K. J., O’Toole, L. J. and Walker, R. M. 2005. ‘Where next? Research directions on performance in public organizations’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15(4): 633–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brief, A. P. and Aldag, R. J. 1977. ‘The intrinsic-extrinsic dichotomy: toward conceptual clarity’, Academy of Management Review 2(3): 496–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deci, E. L. and Ryan, R. M. 1985. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fryer, R. G. Jr., Levitt, S. D., List, J. and Sadoff, S. 2012. ‘Enhancing the efficacy of teacher incentives through loss aversion: a field experiment’, National Bureau of Economic Research, No. w18237.Google Scholar
Gagné, M. and Deci, E. L. 2005. ‘Self-determination theory and work motivation’, Journal of Organizational Behavior 26(4): 331–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gneezy, U. and Rustichini, A. 2000. ‘Pay enough or don’t pay at all’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 115(3): 791–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, A. M. 2007. ‘Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference’, Academy of Management Review 32(2): 393–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, A. M. 2008a. ‘Employees without a cause: the motivational effects of prosocial impact in public service’, International Public Management Journal 11(1): 48–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, A. M. 2008b. ‘The significance of task significance: job performance effects, relational mechanisms, and boundary conditions’, Journal of Applied Psychology 93(1): 108–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grant, A. M. 2008c. ‘Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity’, Journal of Applied Psychology 93(1): 48–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grant, A. M. and Berry, J. W. 2011. ‘The necessity of others is the mother of invention: intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity’, Academy of Management Journal 54: 73–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, A. M., Campbell, E. M., Chen, G., Cottone, K., Lapedis, D. and Lee, K. 2007. ‘Impact and the art of motivation maintenance: the effects of contact with beneficiaries on persistence behavior’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 103: 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, A. M. and Hofmann, D. A. 2011. ‘Outsourcing inspiration: the performance effects of ideological messages from leaders and beneficiaries’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 116(2): 173–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, A. M. and Shin, J. 2012. ‘Work motivation: directing, energizing, and maintaining effort (and research)’, in Ryan, R. M. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Human Motivation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mellström, C. and Johannesson, M. 2008. ‘Crowding out in blood donation: was Titmuss right?’ Journal of the European Economic Association 6(4): 845–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, J. L. 2012. ‘How can we improve our science to generate more usable knowledge for public professionals?’ Public Administration Review 72(4): 479–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, J. L., Hondeghem, A. and Wise, L. Recascino 2010. ‘Revisiting the motivational bases of public service: twenty years of research and an agenda for the future’, Public Administration Review 79(5): 681–90.Google Scholar
Perry, J. L., Mesch, D. and Paarlberg, L. 2006. ‘Motivating employees in a new governance era: the performance paradigm revisited’, Public Administration Review 66(4): 505–14.Google Scholar
Ritz, A., Brewer, G. A. and Neumann, O. 2016. ‘Public service motivation: a systematic literature review and outlook’, Public Administration Review. Early view. doi: 10.1111/puar.12505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, R. M. and Deci, E. L. 2000. ‘Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being’, American Psychologist 55(1): 68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vandenabeele, W. 2007. ‘Toward a public administration theory of public service motivation: an institutional approach’, Public Management Review 9(4): 545–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weibel, A., Rost, K. and Osterloh, M. 2010. ‘Pay for performance in the public sector. Benefits and (hidden) costs’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20(2): 387–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, B. E., Christensen, R. K. and Pandey, S. K. 2013. ‘Measuring public service motivation: exploring the equivalence of existing global measures’, International Public Management Journal 16(2): 197–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2
- Cited by