Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T09:40:11.383Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Section 8 - Vulva and Penis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2019

Maria Rosaria Raspollini
Affiliation:
University Hospital Careggi, Florence
Antonio Lopez-Beltran
Affiliation:
Cordoba University Medical School
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Gynecologic and Urologic Pathology
Similarities, Differences and Challenges
, pp. 331 - 394
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Kamarashev, J.A., Vassileva, S.G.. Dermatologic diseases of the vulva. Clin Dermatol 1997; 15(1): 5365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hansen, A., Carr, K., Jensen, J.T.. Characteristics and initial diagnoses in women presenting to a referral center for vulvovaginal disorders in 1996–2000. J Reprod Med 2002; 47(10): 854860.Google Scholar
Lynch, P.J., Moyal-Barracco, M., Bogliatto, F., Micheletti, L., Scurry, J.. 2006 ISSVD classification of vulvar dermatoses: pathologic subsets and their clinical correlates. J Reprod Med 2007; 52(1): 39.Google Scholar
Lynch, P.J., Moyal-Barracco, M., Scurry, J., Stockdale, C.. 2011 ISSVD terminology and classification of vulvar dermatological disorders: an approach to clinical diagnosis. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2012; 16(4): 339344.Google Scholar
Bauer, A., Rodiger, C., Greif, C., Kaatz, M., Elsner, P.. Vulvar dermatoses: irritant and allergic contact dermatitis of the vulva. Dermatology 2005; 210(2): 143149.Google Scholar
Barchino-Ortiz, L., Suarez-Fernandez, R., Lazaro-Ochaita, P.. [Vulvar inflammatory dermatoses]. Actas Dermosifiliogr 2012; 103(4): 260275.Google Scholar
Selim, M.A., Hoang, M.P.. A histologic review of vulvar inflammatory dermatoses and intraepithelial neoplasm. Dermatol Clin 2010; 28(4): 649667.Google Scholar
Lynch, P.J.. Lichen simplex chronicus (atopic/neurodermatitis) of the anogenital region. Dermatol Ther 2004; 17(1): 819.Google Scholar
Bohl, T.G.. Vulvar ulcers and erosions: a dermatologist’s viewpoint. Dermatol Ther 2004; 17(1): 5567.Google Scholar
Margesson, L.J.. Vulvar disease pearls. Dermatol Clin 2006; 24(2): 145155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schlosser, B.J.. Contact dermatitis of the vulva. Dermatol Clin 2010; 28(4): 697706.Google Scholar
Neill, S.M., Lewis, F.M., Tatnall, F.M., Cox, N.H.. British Association of Dermatologists’ guidelines for the management of lichen sclerosus 2010. Br J Dermatol 2010; 163(4): 672682.Google Scholar
Powell, J., Wojnarowska, F.. Childhood vulvar lichen sclerosus: an increasingly common problem. J Am Acad Dermatol 2001; 44(5): 803806.Google Scholar
Powell, J., Wojnarowska, F.. Childhood vulvar lichen sclerosus: the course after puberty. J Reprod Med 2002; 47(9): 706709.Google ScholarPubMed
Azurdia, R.M., Luzzi, G.A., Byren, I., et al. Lichen sclerosus in adult men: a study of HLA associations and susceptibility to autoimmune disease. Br J Dermatol 1999; 140(1): 7983.Google Scholar
Harrington, C.I., Dunsmore, I.R.. An investigation into the incidence of auto-immune disorders in patients with lichen sclerosus and atrophicus. Br J Dermatol 1981; 104(5): 563566.Google Scholar
Powell, J., Wojnarowska, F., Winsey, S., Marren, P., Welsh, K.. Lichen sclerosus premenarche: autoimmunity and immunogenetics. Br J Dermatol 2000; 142(3): 481484.Google Scholar
Carlson, J.A., Ambros, R., Malfetano, J., et al. Vulvar lichen sclerosus and squamous cell carcinoma: a cohort, case control, and investigational study with historical perspective; implications for chronic inflammation and sclerosis in the development of neoplasia. Hum Pathol 1998; 29(9): 932948.Google Scholar
Zaki, J., Dalziel, K.L., Solomonsz, F.A., Stevens, A.. The under-reporting of skin disease in association with squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. Clin Exp Dermatol 1996; 21(5): 334337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baldo, M., Bailey, A., Bhogal, B., et al. T cells reactive with the NC16A domain of BP180 are present in vulval lichen sclerosus and lichen planus. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2010; 24(2): 186190.Google Scholar
Pipkin., C. Erosive diseases of the vulva. Dermatol Clin 2010; 28(4): 737751.Google Scholar
Belfiore, P., Di, F.O., Cabibi, D., et al. Prevalence of vulval lichen planus in a cohort of women with oral lichen planus: an interdisciplinary study. Br J Dermatol 2006; 155(5): 994998.Google Scholar
Fisler, R.E., Saeb, M., Liang, M.G., Howard, R.M., McKee, P.H.. Childhood bullous pemphigoid: a clinicopathologic study and review of the literature. Am J Dermatopathol 2003; 25(3): 183189.Google Scholar
Chan, L.S., Ahmed, A.R., Anhalt, G.J., et al. The first international consensus on mucous membrane pemphigoid: definition, diagnostic criteria, pathogenic factors, medical treatment, and prognostic indicators. Arch Dermatol 2002; 138(3): 370379.Google Scholar
Hoque, S.R., Patel, M., Farrell, A.M.. Childhood cicatricial pemphigoid confined to the vulva. Clin Exp Dermatol 2006; 31(1): 6364.Google Scholar
Akhyani, M., Chams-Davatchi, C., Naraghi, Z., et al. Cervicovaginal involvement in pemphigus vulgaris: a clinical study of 77 cases. Br J Dermatol 2008; 158(3): 478482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evron, S., Leviatan, A., Okon, E.. Familial benign chronic pemphigus appearing as leukoplakia of the vulva. Int J Dermatol 1984; 23(8): 556557.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wieselthier, J.S., Pincus, S.H.. Hailey–Hailey disease of the vulva. Arch Dermatol 1993; 129(10): 13441345.Google Scholar
Chorzelski, T.P., Kudejko, J., Jablonska, S.. Is papular acantholytic dyskeratosis of the vulva a new entity? Am J Dermatopathol 1984; 6(6): 557560.Google Scholar
Amankwah, Y., Haefner, H.. Vulvar edema. Dermatol Clin 2010; 28(4): 765777.Google Scholar
Ploysangam, T., Heubi, J.E., Eisen, D., Balistreri, W.F., Lucky, A.W.. Cutaneous Crohn’s disease in children. J Am Acad Dermatol 1997; 36(5 Pt 1): 697704.Google Scholar
Feller, E.R., Ribaudo, S., Jackson, N.D.. Gynecologic aspects of Crohn’s disease. Am Fam Physician 2001; 64(10): 17251728.Google Scholar
Virgili, A., Levratti, A., Marzola, A., Corazza, M.. Retrospective histopathologic reevaluation of 18 cases of plasma cell vulvitis. J Reprod Med 2005; 50(1): 37.Google Scholar
Lampert, A., Assier-Bonnet, H., Chevallier, B., Clerici, T., Saiag, P.. Lipschutz’s genital ulceration: a manifestation of Epstein-Barr virus primary infection. Br J Dermatol 1996; 135(4): 663665.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

English, J.C. 3rd, Laws, R.A., Keough, G.C., et al. Dermatoses of the glans penis and prepuce. J Am Acad Dermatol 1997; 37: 124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Dijk, F., Thio, H.B., Neumann, H.A.M.. Non-oncological and non-infectious diseases of the penis (penile lesions). EEUS 2006; 4: 1319.Google Scholar
Escala, J.M., Rickwood, A.M.. Balanitis. Br J Urol 1989; 63: 196197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mindel, A., Tovey, S.J., Timmins, D.J., Williams, P.. Primary and secondary syphilis, 20 years’ experience. 2. Clinical features. Genitourin Med 1989; 65: 13.Google Scholar
Fiumara, N.J., Kahn, S.. Contact dermatitis from a gonococcal discharge: a case report. Sex Transm Dis 1982; 9: 4142.Google Scholar
Köhn, F.M., Pflieger-Bruss, S., Schill, W.B.. Penile skin diseases. Andrologia 1999; 31(Suppl 1): 311.Google Scholar
Johnson, R.A.. Diseases and disorders of the anogenitalia of males. In: Fitzpatrick, T.B., Eisen, A.Z., Wolff, K., Freedberg, I.M., Austen, K.F., editors, Dermatology in General Medicine. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.; 1993, p. 14171462.Google Scholar
Chosidow, O.. Scabies and pediculosis. Lancet 2000; 355: 819826.Google Scholar
Brown, T.J., Yen-Moore, A., Tyring, S.K.. An overview of sexually transmitted diseases. Part I. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999; 41: 511532.Google Scholar
Whitley, R.J., Roizman, B.. Herpes simplex virus infections. Lancet 2001; 357: 15131518.Google Scholar
Dillner, J., Meijer, C.J., von Krogh, G., Horenblas, S.. Epidemiology of human papillomavirus infection. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl 2000; 205: 194200.Google Scholar
Severson, J., Evans, T.Y., Lee, P., et al. Human papillomavirus infections: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and therapy. J Cutan Med Surg 2001; 5: 4360.Google Scholar
Fisher, B.K., Margesson, L.J.. Genital Skin Disorders. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1998.Google Scholar
Micali, G., Lacarrubba, F.. Augmented diagnostic capability using videodermatoscopy on selected infectious and non-infectious penile growths. Int J Dermatol 2011; 50: 15011505.Google Scholar
West, D.S., Papalas, J.A., Selim, M.A., Vollmer, R.T.. Dermatopathology of the foreskin: an institutional experience of over 400 cases. J Cutan Pathol 2013; 40: 1118.Google Scholar
Lebwohl, M.. Psoriasis. Lancet 2003; 361: 11971204.Google Scholar
Boyd, A.S., Neldner, K.H.. Lichen planus. J Am Acad Dermatol 1991; 25: 593619.Google Scholar
Poindexter, G., Morrell, D.S.. Anogenital pruritus: lichen sclerosus in children. Pediatr Ann 2007; 36: 785791.Google Scholar
Laimon, C.W., Freeman, C.. Relationship of balanitis xerotica obliterans to lichen sclerosus and atrophicus. Arch Dermat Syph 1944; 49: 5759.Google Scholar
Velazquez, E.F., Cubilla, A.L.. Lichen sclerosus in 68 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: frequent atypias and correlation with special carcinoma variants suggests a precancerous role. Am J Surg Pathol 2003; 27: 14481453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Renaud-Vilmer, C., Cavelier-Balloy, B., Verola, O., et al. Analysis of alterations adjacent to invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis and their relationship with associated carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 2010; 62: 284290.Google Scholar
Gray, M.R., Ansell, I.D.. Pseudo-epitheliomatous hyperkeratotic and micaceous balanitis: evidence for regarding it as pre-malignant. Br J Urol 1990; 66: 103104.Google Scholar
van Ulsen, J., Stolz, E., van Joost, T., Geursen-Reitsma, A.M.. Allergy to spermicidal lubricant in a contraceptive. Contact Dermatitis 1987; 17: 115116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sehgal, V.N., Srivastava, G.. Fixed drug eruption (FDE): changing scenario of incriminating drugs. Int J Dermatol 2006; 45: 897908.Google Scholar
Alessi, E., Coggi, A., Gianotti, R.. Review of 120 biopsies performed on the balanopreputial sac: from Zoon’s balanitis to the concept of a wider spectrum of inflammatory non-cicatricial balanoposthitis. Dermatology 2004; 208: 120124.Google Scholar
Ackerman, A.B., Kronberg, R.. Pearly penile papules, acral angiofibromas. Arch Dermatol 1973; 108: 673675.Google Scholar

References

Del Pino, M., Rodriguez-Carunchio, L., Ordi, J.. Pathways of vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia and squamous cell carcinoma. Histopathology 2013; 62(1): 161175.Google Scholar
Reyes, M.C., Cooper, K.. An update on vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia: terminology and a practical approach to diagnosis. J Clin Pathol 2014; 67(4): 290294.Google Scholar
Bornstein, J., Bogliatto, F., Haefner, H.K., et al. The 2015 International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease (ISSVD) Terminology of Vulvar Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 127(2): 264268.Google Scholar
Darragh, T.M., Colgan, T.J., Thomas, C.J., et al. The Lower Anogenital Squamous Terminology Standardization project for HPV-associated lesions: background and consensus recommendations from the College of American Pathologists and the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2013; 32(1): 76115.Google Scholar
de Sanjose, S., Alemany, L., Ordi, J., et al. Worldwide human papillomavirus genotype attribution in over 2000 cases of intraepithelial and invasive lesions of the vulva. Eur J Cancer 2013; 49(16): 34503461.Google Scholar
Ordi, J., Garcia, S., Del, P.M., et al. p16 INK4a immunostaining identifies occult CIN lesions in HPV-positive women. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2009; 28(1): 9097.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santos, M., Montagut, C., Mellado, B., et al. Immunohistochemical staining for p16 and p53 in premalignant and malignant epithelial lesions of the vulva. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2004; 23(3): 206214.Google Scholar
Sideri, M., Jones, R.W., Wilkinson, E.J., et al. Squamous vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia: 2004 modified terminology, ISSVD Vulvar Oncology Subcommittee. J Reprod Med 2005; 50(11): 807810.Google Scholar
Singh, N., Leen, S.L., Han, G., et al. Expanding the morphologic spectrum of differentiated VIN (dVIN) through detailed mapping of cases with p53 loss. Am J Surg Pathol 2015; 39(1): 5260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joura, E.A., Giuliano, A.R., Iversen, O.E., et al. A 9-valent HPV vaccine against infection and intraepithelial neoplasia in women. N Engl J Med 2015; 372(8): 711723.Google Scholar
Serrano, B., de Sanjose, S., Tous, S., et al. Human papillomavirus genotype attribution for HPVs 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52 and 58 in female anogenital lesions. Eur J Cancer 2015; 51(13): 17321741.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maniar, K.P., Ronnett, B.M., Vang, R., Yemelyanova, A.. Coexisting high-grade vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) and condyloma acuminatum: independent lesions due to different HPV types occurring in immunocompromised patients. Am J Surg Pathol 2013; 37(1): 5360.Google Scholar
Nooij, L.S., Dreef, E.J., Smit, V.T., van Poelgeest, M.I., Bosse, T.. Stathmin is a highly sensitive and specific biomarker for vulvar high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. J Clin Pathol 2016; 69: 10701075.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Srodon, M., Stoler, M.H., Baber, G.B., Kurman, R.J.. The distribution of low and high-risk HPV types in vulvar and vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN and VaIN). Am J Surg Pathol 2006; 30(12): 15131518.Google Scholar
Santos, M., Landolfi, S., Olivella, A., et al. p16 overexpression identifies HPV-positive vulvar squamous cell carcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol 2006; 30(11): 13471356.Google Scholar
Fehr, M.K., Baumann, M., Mueller, M., et al. Disease progression and recurrence in women treated for vulvovaginal intraepithelial neoplasia. J Gynecol Oncol 2013; 24(3): 236241.Google Scholar
Jones, R.W., Rowan, D.M.. Spontaneous regression of vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia 2–3. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 96(3): 470472.Google ScholarPubMed
Jones, R.W., Rowan, D.M., Stewart, A.W.. Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia: aspects of the natural history and outcome in 405 women. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106(6): 13191326.Google Scholar
Kim, J.M., Lee, H.J., Kim, S.H., et al. Efficacy of 5% imiquimod cream on vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia in Korea: pilot study. Ann Dermatol 2015; 27(1): 6670.Google Scholar
Baandrup, L., Varbo, A., Munk, C., et al. In situ and invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva in Denmark 1978–2007: a nationwide population-based study. Gynecol Oncol 2011; 122(1): 4549.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stephenson, R.D., Denehy, T.R.. Rapid spontaneous regression of acute-onset vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia 3 in young women: a case series. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2012; 16(1): 5658.Google Scholar
Scurry, J., Baskota, S.U.. HPV-associated atypical mitotic figures in squamous intraepithelial lesions of the lower female genital tract. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2016; 20(2): 165168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sah, S.P., Kelly, P.J., McManus, D.T., McCluggage, W.G.. Diffuse CK7, CAM5.2 and BerEP4 positivity in pagetoid squamous cell carcinoma in situ (pagetoid Bowen’s disease) of the perianal region: a mimic of extramammary Paget’s disease. Histopathology 2013; 62(3): 511514.Google Scholar
Carlson, B.C., Hofer, M.D., Ballek, N., et al. Protein markers of malignant potential in penile and vulvar lichen sclerosus. J Urol 2013; 190(2): 399406.Google Scholar
Chen, H., Gonzalez, J.L., Brennick, J.B., Liu, M., Yan, S.. Immunohistochemical patterns of ProEx C in vulvar squamous lesions: detection of overexpression of MCM2 and TOP2A. Am J Surg Pathol 2010; 34(9): 12501257.Google Scholar
Li, B., Zhang, Q., Ouyang, L., et al. Aberrant staining patterns of E-cadherin and beta-catenin: a potential diagnostic value for distinguishing vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia from non-neoplastic vulvar lesions. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2013; 6(7): 13621366.Google Scholar
Wellenhofer, A., Brustmann, H.. Expression of human telomerase reverse transcriptase in vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia and squamous cell carcinoma: an immunohistochemical study with survivin and p53. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2012; 136(11): 13591365.Google Scholar
Wu, Z., Shen, Y., Gong, K., et al. Increased osteopontin expression is associated with progression from vulvar precancerous lesions to vulvar squamous cell carcinoma. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2014; 289(3): 637644.Google Scholar
Howitt, B.E., Nucci, M.R., Drapkin, R., Crum, C.P., Hirsch, M.S.. Stathmin-1 expression as a complement to p16 helps identify high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia with increased specificity. Am J Surg Pathol 2013; 37(1): 8997.Google Scholar
Herod, J.J., Shafi, M.I., Rollason, T.P., Jordan, J.A., Luesley, D.M.. Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia with superficially invasive carcinoma of the vulva. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 103(5): 453456.Google Scholar
Chiu, T.L., Jones, R.W.. Multifocal multicentric squamous cell carcinomas arising in vulvovaginal lichen planus. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2011; 15(3): 246247.Google Scholar
Bigby, S.M., Eva, L.J., Fong, K.L., Jones, R.W.. The natural history of vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia, differentiated type: evidence for progression and diagnostic challenges. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2016; 35: 574584.Google Scholar
Ordi, J., Alejo, M., Fuste, V., et al. HPV-negative vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) with basaloid histologic pattern: an unrecognized variant of simplex (differentiated) VIN. Am J Surg Pathol 2009; 33(11): 16591665.Google Scholar
Yang, B., Hart, W.R.. Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia of the simplex (differentiated) type: a clinicopathologic study including analysis of HPV and p53 expression. Am J Surg Pathol 2000; 24(3): 429441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reutter, J.C., Walters, R.A., Selim, M.A.. Differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia: what criteria do we use in practice? J Low Genit Tract Dis 2016; 20(3): 261266.Google Scholar
van de Nieuwenhof, H.P., Bulten, J., Hollema, H., et al. Differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia is often found in lesions, previously diagnosed as lichen sclerosus, which have progressed to vulvar squamous cell carcinoma. Mod Pathol 2011; 24(2): 297305.Google Scholar
van den Einden, L.C., de Hullu, J.A., Massuger, L.F., et al. Interobserver variability and the effect of education in the histopathological diagnosis of differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia. Mod Pathol 2013; 26(6): 874880.Google Scholar
Wallbillich, J.J., Rhodes, H.E., Milbourne, A.M., et al. Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN 2/3): comparing clinical outcomes and evaluating risk factors for recurrence. Gynecol Oncol 2012; 127(2): 312315.Google Scholar
Holway, A.H., Rieger-Christ, K.M., Miner, W.R., et al. Somatic mutation of PTEN in vulvar cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2000; 6(8): 32283235.Google Scholar
Guerrero, D., Guarch, R., Ojer, A., et al. Differential hypermethylation of genes in vulvar cancer and lichen sclerosus coexisting or not with vulvar cancer. Int J Cancer 2011; 128(12): 28532864.Google Scholar
Liegl, B., Regauer, S.. p53 immunostaining in lichen sclerosus is related to ischaemic stress and is not a marker of differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (d-VIN). Histopathology 2006; 48(3): 268274.Google Scholar

References

Bandieramonte, G., Colecchia, M., Mariani, L., et al. Peniscopically controlled CO2 laser excision for conservative treatment of in situ and T1 penile carcinoma: report on 224 patients. Eur Urol 2008; 54: 875882.Google Scholar
Velazquez, E.F., Cubilla, A.L., Piris, A., et al. Penile intraepitheial neoplasia. In: Moch, H., Humphrey, P.A., Ulbright, T.M., Reuter, V.E., editors, WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs. 4th edn. Lyon: IARC Press; 2016.Google Scholar
Chaux, A., Pfannl, R., Rodríguez, I.M., et al. Distinctive immunohistochemical profile of penile intraepithelial lesions: a study of 74 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2011; 35: 553562.Google Scholar
Cubilla, A.L., Velazquez, E.F., Young, R.H.. Epithelial lesions associated with invasive penile squamous cell carcinoma: a pathologic study of 288 cases. Int J Surg Pathol 2004; 12: 351364.Google Scholar
Oertel, J., Iglesias, M., Amat, L., et al. Squamous hyperplasia (SH), lichen sclerosus (LS), differentiated pein (PeIN) and low grade variants of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC): distinctive preputial lesions in a survey of 99 circumcision specimens from a region of high incidence of penile cancer. Mod Pathol 2009; 22: 187A.Google Scholar
Chaux, A., Pfannl, R., Lloveras, B., et al. Distinctive association of p16INK4a overexpression with penile intraepithelial neoplasia depicting warty and/or basaloid features: a study of 141 cases evaluating a new nomenclature. Am J Surg Pathol 2010; 34: 385392.Google Scholar
Soskin, A., Vieillefond, A., Carlotti, A., et al. Warty/basaloid penile intraepithelial neoplasia is more prevalent than differentiated penile intraepithelial neoplasia in nonendemic regions for penile cancer when compared with endemic areas: a comparative study between pathologic series from Paris and Paraguay. Hum Pathol 2012; 43: 190196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaux, A., Velazquez, E.F., Amin, A., et al. Distribution and characterization of subtypes of penile intraepithelial neoplasia and their association with invasive carcinomas: a pathological study of 139 lesions in 121 patients. Hum Pathol 2012; 43: 10201027.Google Scholar
Gregoire, L., Cubilla, A.L., Reuter, V.E., et al. Preferential association of human papillomavirus with high-grade histologic variants of penile-invasive squamous cell carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995; 87: 17051709.Google Scholar
Cubilla, A.L., Reuter, V., Velazquez, E., et al. Histologic classification of penile carcinoma and its relation to outcome in 61 patients with primary resection. Int J Surg Pathol 2001; 9: 111120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, N., Gong, K., Zhang, X., et al. Extramammary Paget’s disease of scrotum: report of 25 cases and literature review. Urol Oncol 2010; 28: 2833.Google Scholar
Williamson, J.D., Colome, M.I., Sahin, A., et al. Pagetoid bowen disease: a report of 2 cases that express cytokeratin 7. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000; 124: 427430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amin, A., Griffith, R.C., Chaux, A.. Penile intraepithelial neoplasia with pagetoid features: report of an unusual variant mimicking Paget disease. Hum Pathol 2014; 45: 889892.Google Scholar
Epstein, J.H., Cubilla, A.L., Humphrey, P.A.. Tumors of the prostate gland, seminal vescicles, penis and scrotum. In: Atlas of Tumor Pathology. Washington, DC: AFIP; 2011, p. 405612.Google Scholar
Chang, J., Prieto, V.G., Sangueza, M., et al. Diagnostic utility of p63 expression in the differential diagnosis of pagetoid squamous cell carcinoma in situ and extramammary Paget disease: a histopathologic study of 70 cases. Am J Dermatopathol 2014; 36: 4953.Google Scholar
Salamanca, J., Benito, A., García-Peñalver, C., et al. Paget’s disease of the glans penis secondary to transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: a report of two cases and review of the literature. J Cutan Pathol 2004; 31: 341345.Google Scholar

References

Tyson, M.D., Etzioni, D.A., Wisenbaugh, E.S., et al. Anatomic site-specific disparities in survival outcomes for penile squamous cell carcinoma. Urology 2012; 79(4): 804808.Google Scholar
Viens, L.J., Henley, S.J., Watson, M., et al. Human papillomavirus-associated cancers: United States, 2008–2012. MMWR 2016; 65(26): 661666.Google Scholar
Regauer, S., Reich, O., Eberz, B.. Vulvar cancers in women with vulvar lichen planus: a clinicopathological study. J Am Acad Dermatol 2014; 71(4): 698707.Google Scholar
Bleeker, M.C., Visser, P.J., Overbeek, L.I., van Beurden, M., Berkhof, J.. Lichen sclerosus: incidence and risk of vulvar squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Epidemiol 2016; 25(8): 12241230.Google Scholar
Kurman, R.J., Toki, T., Schiffman, M.H.. Basaloid and warty carcinomas of the vulva: distinctive types of squamous cell carcinoma frequently associated with human papillomaviruses. Am J Surg Pathol 1993; 17(2): 133145.Google Scholar
Gualco, M., Bonin, S., Foglia, G., et al. Morphologic and biologic studies on ten cases of verrucous carcinoma of the vulva supporting the theory of a discrete clinico-pathologic entity. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2003; 13(3): 317324.Google Scholar
Velazquez, E.F., Melamed, J., Barreto, J.E., Aguero, F., Cubilla, A.L.. Sarcomatoid carcinoma of the penis: a clinicopathologic study of 15 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2005; 29(9): 11521158.Google Scholar
Fiset, P.O., Wou, K., Arseneau, J., Gilbert, L.. Vulvar carcinosarcoma secondary to radiotherapy: a case report and review of the literature. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2014; 18(3): e74e79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanchez, D.F., Rodriguez, I.M., Piris, A., et al. Clear cell carcinoma of the penis: an HPV-related variant of squamous cell carcinoma: a report of 3 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2016; 40(7): 917922.Google Scholar
Cubilla, A.L., Reuter, V., Velazquez, E., et al. Histologic classification of penile carcinoma and its relation to outcome in 61 patients with primary resection. Int J Surg Pathol 2001; 9(2): 111120.Google Scholar
Choschzick, M., Hantaredja, W., Tennstedt, P., et al. Role of TP53 mutations in vulvar carcinomas. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2011; 30(5): 497504.Google Scholar
Cheng, A.S., Karnezis, A.N., Jordan, S., et al. p16 immunostaining allows for accurate subclassification of vulvar squamous cell carcinoma into HPV-associated and HPV-independent cases. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2016; 35(4): 385393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steinestel, J., Al Ghazal, A., Arndt, A., et al. The role of histologic subtype, p16(INK4a) expression, and presence of human papillomavirus DNA in penile squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Cancer 2015; 15: 220.Google Scholar
Sznurkowski, J.J., Zawrocki, A., Biernat, W.. The overexpression of p16 is not a surrogate marker for high-risk human papilloma virus genotypes and predicts clinical outcomes for vulvar cancer. BMC Cancer 2016; 16: 465.Google Scholar
Dong, F., Kojiro, S., Borger, D.R., Growdon, W.B., Oliva, E.. Squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva: a subclassification of 97 cases by clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular features (p16, p53, and EGFR). Am J Surg Pathol 2015; 39(8): 10451053.Google Scholar
Bezerra, S.M., Chaux, A., Ball, M.W., et al. Human papillomavirus infection and immunohistochemical p16(INK4a) expression as predictors of outcome in penile squamous cell carcinomas. Hum Pathol 2015; 46(4): 532540.Google Scholar
Koukoura, O., Klados, G., Strataki, M., Daponte, A.. A rapidly growing vulvar condyloma acuminatum in a young patient. BMJ Case Rep. 2015: doi: 10.1136/bcr-2014-208126.Google Scholar
Domfeh, A.B., Silasi, D.A., Lindo, F., Parkash, V.. Chronic hypertrophic vulvar herpes simulating neoplasia. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2012; 31(1): 3337.Google Scholar
Makris, G.M., Poulakaki, N., Papanota, A.M., et al. Vulvar, perianal and perineal cancer after hidradenitis suppurativa: a systematic review and pooled analysis. Dermatol Surg 2017; 43: 107115.Google Scholar
Ozkan, F., Bilgic, R., Cesur, S.. Vulvar keratoacanthoma. APMIS 2006; 114(7–8): 562565.Google Scholar
Baker, G.M., Selim, M.A., Hoang, M.P.. Vulvar adnexal lesions: a 32-year, single-institution review from Massachusetts General Hospital. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2013; 137(9): 12371246.Google Scholar
Breslow, A., Thickness, cross-sectional areas and depth of invasion in the prognosis of cutaneous melanoma. Ann Surg 1970; 172(5): 902908.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, E.J.; Cancer Committee of the American College of Pathologists. Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with carcinomas and malignant melanomas of the vulva: a basis for checklists. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000; 124(1): 5156.Google Scholar
Ramirez, P.T., Levenback, C.. Long-term outcomes of sentinel node mapping in vulvar cancer: a time to cheer with enthusiasm or pause and question current practice? Gynecol Oncol 2016; 140(1): 12.Google Scholar
Djajadiningrat, R.S., Graafland, N.M., van Werkhoven, E., et al. Contemporary management of regional nodes in penile cancer-improvement of survival? J Urol 2014; 191(1): 6873.Google Scholar
Pizzocaro, G., Algaba, F., Horenblas, S., et al. EAU penile cancer guidelines 2009. Eur Urol 2010; 57(6): 10021012.Google Scholar
Woelber, L., Mahner, S., Voelker, K., et al. Clinicopathological prognostic factors and patterns of recurrence in vulvar cancer. Anticancer Res 2009; 29(2): 545552.Google Scholar
Li, Z.S., Yao, K., Chen, P., et al. Development of a new classification method for penile squamous cell carcinoma based on lymph node density and standard pathological risk factors: the ND staging system. J Cancer 2016; 7(3): 262267.Google Scholar
Rogers, H.W., Weinstock, M.A., Harris, A.R., et al. Incidence estimate of nonmelanoma skin cancer in the United States, 2006. Arch Dermatol 2010; 146(3): 283287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D.L., Weinstock, M.A.. Nonmelanoma skin cancer in the United States: incidence. J Am Acad Dermatol 1994; 30(5 Pt 1): 774778.Google Scholar
Gibson, G.E., Ahmed, I.. Perianal and genital basal cell carcinoma: a clinicopathologic review of 51 cases. J Am Acad Dermatol 2001; 45(1): 6871.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubin, A.I., Chen, E.H., Ratner, D.. Basal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2005; 353(21): 22622269.Google Scholar
de Giorgi, V., Salvini, C., Massi, D., Raspollini, M.R., Carli, P.. Vulvar basal cell carcinoma: retrospective study and review of literature. Gynecol Oncol 2005; 97(1): 192194.Google Scholar
Elwood, H., Kim, J., Yemelyanova, A., Ronnett, B.M., Taube, J.M.. Basal cell carcinomas of the vulva: high-risk human papillomavirus DNA detection, p16 and BerEP4 expression. Am J Surg Pathol 2014; 38(4): 542547.Google Scholar
Chang, Y.T., Liu, H.N., Wong, C.K.. Penile basal cell carcinoma with eccrine differentiation. Clin Exp Dermatol 1995; 20(6): 487489.Google Scholar
Clark, C.M., Furniss, M., Mackay-Wiggan, J.M.. Basal cell carcinoma: an evidence-based treatment update. Am J Clin Dermatol 2014; 15(3): 197216.Google Scholar
Smeets, N.W., Krekels, G.A., Ostertag, J.U., et al. Surgical excision vs Mohs’ micrographic surgery for basal-cell carcinoma of the face: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004; 364(9447): 17661772.Google Scholar
Feakins, R.M., Lowe, D.G.. Basal cell carcinoma of the vulva: a clinicopathologic study of 45 cases. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1997; 16(4): 319324.Google Scholar
Lopes Filho, L.L., Lopes, I.M., Lopes, L.R., et al. Mammary and extramammary Paget’s disease. An Bras Dermatol 2015; 90(2): 225231.Google Scholar
Hegarty, P.K., Suh, J., Fisher, M.B., et al. Penoscrotal extramammary Paget’s disease: the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center contemporary experience. J Urol 2011; 186(1): 97102.Google Scholar
Wang, Z., Lu, M., Dong, G.Q., et al. Penile and scrotal Paget’s disease: 130 Chinese patients with long-term follow-up. BJU Int 2008; 102(4): 485488.Google Scholar
Hart, W.R., Millman, J.B.. Progression of intraepithelial Paget’s disease of the vulva to invasive carcinoma. Cancer 1977; 40(5): 23332337.3.0.CO;2-#>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldblum, J.R., Hart, W.R.. Vulvar Paget’s disease: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 19 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1997; 21(10): 11781187.Google Scholar
Kang, Z., Zhang, Q., Zhang, Q., et al. Clinical and pathological characteristics of extramammary Paget’s disease: report of 246 Chinese male patients. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2015; 8(10): 1323313240.Google Scholar
Goldblum, J.R., Hart, W.R.. Perianal Paget’s disease: a histologic and immunohistochemical study of 11 cases with and without associated rectal adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 1998; 22(2): 170179.Google Scholar
Sleater, J.P., Ford, M.J., Beers, B.B.. Extramammary Paget’s disease associated with prostate adenocarcinoma. Hum Pathol 1994; 25(6): 615617.Google Scholar
Plaza, J.A., Torres-Cabala, C., Ivan, D., Prieto, V.G.. HER-2/neu expression in extramammary Paget disease: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemistry study of 47 cases with and without underlying malignancy. J Cutan Pathol 2009; 36(7): 729733.Google Scholar
Yanai, H., Takahashi, N., Omori, M., et al. Immunohistochemistry of p63 in primary and secondary vulvar Paget’s disease. Pathol Int 2008; 58(10): 648651.Google Scholar
Brown, H.M., Wilkinson, E.J.. Uroplakin-III to distinguish primary vulvar Paget disease from Paget disease secondary to urothelial carcinoma. Hum Pathol 2002; 33(5): 545548.Google Scholar
Chang, J., Prieto, V.G., Sangueza, M., Plaza, J.A.. Diagnostic utility of p63 expression in the differential diagnosis of pagetoid squamous cell carcinoma in situ and extramammary Paget disease: a histopathologic study of 70 cases. Am J Dermatopathol 2014; 36(1): 4953.Google Scholar
Morbeck, D., Tregnago, A.C., Netto, G.B., et al. GATA3 expression in primary vulvar Paget disease: a potential pitfall leading to misdiagnosis of pagetoid urothelial intraepithelial neoplasia. Histopathology 2016; 70(3): 435441.Google Scholar
Boer-Auer, A., August, C., Falk, T.M., et al. Benign mucinous metaplasia of the genital mucosa: histomorphological and immunohistochemical features and criteria for differentiation from extramammary Paget disease. Br J Dermatol 2011; 165(6): 12631272.Google Scholar
Santos-Briz, A., Canueto, J., del Carmen, S., Mir-Bonafe, J.M., Fernandez, E.. Pagetoid dyskeratosis in dermatopathology. Am J Dermatopathol 2015; 37(4): 261265; quiz 266–268.Google Scholar
Hastrup, N., Andersen, E.S.. Adenocarcinoma of Bartholin’s gland associated with extramammary Paget’s disease of the vulva. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1988; 67(4): 375377.Google Scholar
Mendivil, A.A., Abaid, L., Epstein, H.D., et al. Paget’s disease of the vulva: a clinicopathologic institutional review. Int J Clin Oncol 2012; 17(6): 569574.Google Scholar
Cai, Y., Sheng, W., Xiang, L., Wu, X., Yang, H.. Primary extramammary Paget’s disease of the vulva: the clinicopathological features and treatment outcomes in a series of 43 patients. Gynecol Oncol 2013; 129(2): 412416.Google Scholar
Ito, Y., Igawa, S., Ohishi, Y., et al. Prognostic indicators in 35 patients with extramammary Paget’s disease. Dermatol Surg 2012; 38(12): 19381944.Google Scholar
Albores-Saavedra, J., Batich, K., Chable-Montero, F., et al. Merkel cell carcinoma demographics, morphology, and survival based on 3870 cases: a population based study. J Cutan Pathol 2010; 37(1): 2027.Google Scholar
Tomic, S., Warner, T.F., Messing, E., Wilding, G.. Penile Merkel cell carcinoma. Urology 1995; 45(6): 10621065.Google Scholar
Tilling, T., Moll, I.. Which are the cells of origin in Merkel cell carcinoma? J Skin Cancer 2012; 2012: 680410.Google Scholar
Liu, W., MacDonald, M., You, J.. Merkel cell polyomavirus infection and Merkel cell carcinoma. Curr Opin Virol 2016; 20: 2027.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gonzalez-Vela, M.D., Curiel-Olmo, S., Derdak, S., et al. Shared oncogenic pathways implicated in both virus-positive and UV-induced Merkel Cell Carcinomas. J Invest Dermatol 2016; 137: 197206.Google Scholar
Garrett, G.L., Zargham, H., Schulman, J.M., et al. Merkel cell carcinoma in organ transplant recipients: case reports and review of the literature. JAAD Case Rep 2015; 1(6): S29S32.Google Scholar
Hierro, I., Blanes, A., Matilla, A., et al. Merkel cell (neuroendocrine) carcinoma of the vulva: a case report with immunohistochemical and ultrastructural findings and review of the literature. Pathol Res Pract 2000; 196(7): 503509.Google Scholar
Li, N., Wolgamot, G., Argenyi, Z.. Primary cutaneous neuroendocrine cell carcinoma (Merkel cell carcinoma) with prominent microcystic features, mimicking eccrine carcinoma. J Cutan Pathol 2007; 34(5): 410414.Google Scholar
Miner, A.G., Patel, R.M., Wilson, D.A., et al. Cytokeratin 20-negative Merkel cell carcinoma is infrequently associated with the Merkel cell polyomavirus. Mod Pathol 2015; 28(4): 498504.Google Scholar
Fleming, K.E., Ly, T.Y., Pasternak, S., et al. Support for p63 expression as an adverse prognostic marker in Merkel cell carcinoma: report on a Canadian cohort. Hum Pathol 2014; 45(5): 952960.Google Scholar
Reddi, D.M., Puri, P.K.. Expression of focal TTF-1 expression in a case of CK7/CK20-positive Merkel cell carcinoma. J Cutan Pathol 2013; 40(4): 431433.Google Scholar
Mansouri, S., Glaria, L.A., Asmae, N., Flores, L.F.. Case of lung carcinoma revealed by vulvar metastasis associated with systemic scleroderma and literature review. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2013; 18(3): 182188.Google Scholar
Iyer, J.G., Storer, B.E., Paulson, K.G., et al. Relationships among primary tumor size, number of involved nodes, and survival for 8044 cases of Merkel cell carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 2014; 70(4): 637643.Google Scholar
Feldmeyer, L., Hudgens, C.W., Ray-Lyons, G., et al. Density, distribution, and composition of immune infiltrates correlate with survival in Merkel cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2016; 22: doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0392.Google Scholar
Hisamatsu, H., Sakai, H., Igawa, T., et al. Adenoid cystic carcinoma of Cowper’s gland. BJU Int 2003; 92(Suppl 3): e56e57.Google Scholar
Cardosi, R.J., Speights, A., Fiorica, J.V., et al. Bartholin’s gland carcinoma: a 15-year experience. Gynecol Oncol 2001; 82(2): 247251.Google Scholar
Kozakiewicz, B., Dmoch-Gajzlerska, E., Roszkowska-Purska, K.. Carcinomas and sarcomas of Bartholin gland: a report of nine cases and review of the literature. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2014; 35(3): 243249.Google Scholar
Sosnik, H., Sosnik, K., Halon, A.. The pathomorphology of Bartholin’s gland: analysis of surgical data. Pol J Pathol 2007; 58(2): 99103.Google Scholar
Balat, O., Edwards, C.L., Delclos, L.. Advanced primary carcinoma of the Bartholin gland: report of 18 patients. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2001; 22(1): 4649.Google Scholar
Piura, B., Egan, M., Lopes, A., Monaghan, J.M.. Malignant melanoma of the vulva: a clinicopathologic study of 18 cases. J Surg Oncol 1992; 50(4): 234240.Google Scholar
Sanchez, A., Rodriguez, D., Allard, C.B., et al. Primary genitourinary melanoma: epidemiology and disease-specific survival in a large population-based cohort. Urol Oncol 2016; 34(4): 166e7166e14.Google Scholar
Sanchez-Ortiz, R., Huang, S.F., Tamboli, P., et al. Melanoma of the penis, scrotum and male urethra: a 40-year single institution experience. J Urol 2005; 173(6): 19581965.Google Scholar
Ragnarsson-Olding, B.K.. Spatial density of primary malignant melanoma in sun-shielded body sites: a potential guide to melanoma genesis. Acta Oncol 2011; 50(3): 323328.Google Scholar
Ragnarsson-Olding, B.K.. Primary malignant melanoma of the vulva: an aggressive tumor for modeling the genesis of non-UV light-associated melanomas. Acta Oncol 2004; 43(5): 421435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bechara, G.R., Schwindt, A.B., Ornellas, A.A., et al. Penile primary melanoma: analysis of 6 patients treated at Brazilian National Cancer Institute in the last eight years. Int Braz J Urol 2013; 39(6): 823831.Google Scholar
Rouzbahman, M., Kamel-Reid, S., Al Habeeb, A., et al. Malignant melanoma of vulva and vagina: a histomorphological review and mutation analysis: a single-center study. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2015; 19(4): 350353.Google Scholar
Feldmeyer, L., Tetzlaff, M., Fox, P., et al. Prognostic implication of lymphovascular invasion detected by double immunostaining for D2-40 and MITF1 in primary cutaneous melanoma. Am J Dermatopathol 2016; 38(7): 484491.Google Scholar
Verschraegen, C.F., Benjapibal, M., Supakarapongkul, W., et al. Vulvar melanoma at the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center: 25 years later. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2001; 11(5): 359364.Google Scholar
Nagarajan, P., Curry, J.L., Ning, J., et al. Tumor thickness and mitotic rate robustly predict melanoma-specific survival in patients with primary vulvar melanoma: a retrospective review of 100 cases. Clin Cancer Res 2017; doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2126.Google Scholar

References

Kumaraguru, V., Prabhu, R., Kannan, N.S.. Penile epidermal cyst: a case report. J Clin Diagn Res 2016; 10(5): PD05–PD06.Google Scholar
Madan, S., Joshi, R.. Trichilemmal cyst of the penis in a paediatric patient. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J 2015; 15(1): e129–e132.Google Scholar
Tomasini, C., Aloi, F., Puiatti, P., Caliendo, V.. Dermoid cyst of the penis. Dermatology 1997; 194(2): 188190.Google Scholar
de Lima, M.M., Jr., de Lima, M.M., Granja, F.. Steatocystoma simplex in penile foreskin: a case report. J Med Case Rep 2016; 10: 49.Google Scholar
Lezcano, C., Chaux, A., Velazquez, E.F., Cubilla, A.L. Clinicopathological features and histogenesis of penile cysts. Semin Diagn Pathol 2015; 32(3): 245248.Google Scholar
van der Werff, J.F., Nievelstein, R.A., Brands, E., Luijsterburg, A.J., Vermeij-Keers, C.. Normal development of the male anterior urethra. Teratology 2000; 61(3): 172183.Google Scholar
Soendjojo, A., Pindha, S.. Trichomonas vaginalis infection of the median raphe of the penis. Sex Transm Dis 1981; 8(4): 255257.Google Scholar
Unal, B., Bassorgun, C.I., Eren Karanis, M.I., Elpek, G.O.. Perianal median raphe cyst: a rare lesion with unusual histology and localization. Case Rep Dermatol Med 2015; 2015: 487814.Google Scholar
Falleti, J., Cuccuru, A., Mignogna, C.. Proliferating trichilemmal cyst of the vulva. Clin Exp Dermatol 2009; 34(7): e459e460.Google Scholar
Rongioletti, F., Cattarini, G., Romanelli, P.. Late onset vulvar steatocystoma multiplex. Clin Exp Dermatol 2002; 27(6): 445447.Google Scholar
Adotama, P., Susa, J., Glass, D.A., 2nd. Primary milia localized to the vulva. Dermatol Online J 2014; 20(4): 22339.Google Scholar
Chuang, Y.H., Hong, H.S., Kuo, T.T.. Multiple pigmented follicular cysts of the vulva successfully treated with CO2 laser: case report and literature review. Dermatol Surg 2004; 30(9): 12611264.Google Scholar
Anderson, S.R.. Benign vulvovaginal cysts. Diagn Histopathol 2010; 16(11): 495499.Google Scholar
Heller, D.S.. Benign tumors and tumor-like lesions of the vulva. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2015; 58(3): 526535.Google Scholar
Moralioglu, S., Bosnali, O., Celayir, A.V., Sahin, C.. Paraurethral Skene’s duct cyst in a newborn. Urol Ann 2013; 5(3): 204205.Google Scholar
Gottesman, J.E., Sparkuhl, A.. Bilateral Skene duct cysts. J Pediatr 1979; 94(6): 945946.Google Scholar
Schober, M.S., Hendrickson, B.W., Alpert, S.A.. Spontaneous clitoral hood epidermal inclusion cyst mimicking clitoromegaly in a pediatric patient. Urology 2014; 84(1): 206208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Al-Ojaimi, E.H., Abdulla, M.M.. Giant epidermoid inclusion cyst of the clitoris mimicking clitoromegaly. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2013; 17(1): 5860.Google Scholar
Pehlivan, M., Ozbay, P.O., Temur, M., et al. Epidermal cyst in an unusual site: a case report. Int J Surg Case Rep 2015; 8C: 114116.Google Scholar
Sze, S., Richmond, I., Bickers, A., Saha, A.. Squamous cell carcinoma arising from a vulval epidermal cyst. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2016; 42(11): 16231626.Google Scholar
Fetsch, J.F., Davis, C.J., Jr., Hallman, J.R., et al. Lymphedematous fibroepithelial polyps of the glans penis and prepuce: a clinicopathologic study of 7 cases demonstrating a strong association with chronic condom catheter use. Hum Pathol 2004; 35(2): 190195.Google Scholar
Mason, S.E., DeVilliers, P., Andea, A.A.. Lymphedematous fibroepithelial polyps of the penis associated with long-term condom catheter use: case report and review of the literature. J Cutan Pathol 2009; 36(8): 906909.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khalil, A.M., Nahhas, D.E., Shabb, N.S., et al. Vulvar fibroepithelial polyp with myxoid stroma: an unusual presentation. Gynecol Oncol 1994; 53(1): 125127.Google Scholar
Suster, S., III. Cutaneous cysts. In: Plaza, J.A., Prieto, V.G., editors, Neoplastic Lesions of the Skin. Demos Surgical Pathology Guides. New York: Demos Medical Publishing; 2013, p. 165.Google Scholar
Friedman, S.J., Fox, B.J., Albert, H.L.. Seborrheic keratoses of penis. Urology 1987; 29(2): 204206.Google Scholar
de Giorgi, V., Massi, D., Salvini, C., Mannone, F., Carli, P.. Pigmented seborrheic keratoses of the vulva clinically mimicking a malignant melanoma: a clinical, dermoscopic-pathologic case study. Clin Exp Dermatol 2005; 30(1): 1719.Google Scholar
Sudhakar, N., Venkatesan, S., Mohanasundari, P.S., Thilagavathy, S., Elangovan, P.. Seborrheic keratosis over genitalia masquerading as Buschke Lowenstein tumor. Indian J Sex Transm Dis 2015; 36(1): 7779.Google Scholar
Niazy, F., Rostami, K., Motabar, A.R.. Giant condyloma acuminatum of vulva frustrating treatment challenge. World J Plast Surg 2015; 4(2): 159162.Google Scholar
Koukoura, O., Klados, G., Strataki, M., Daponte, A.. A rapidly growing vulvar condyloma acuminatum in a young patient. BMJ Case Rep 2015. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2014-208126.Google Scholar
Spinu, D., Radulescu, A., Bratu, O., et al. Giant condyloma acuminatum – Buschke-Lowenstein disease: a literature review. Chirurgia (Bucur) 2014; 109(4): 445450.Google Scholar
Kurman, R.J., Shah, K.H., Lancaster, W.D., Jenson, A.B.. Immunoperoxidase localization of papillomavirus antigens in cervical dysplasia and vulvar condylomas. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981; 140(8): 931935.Google Scholar
Koenig, C., Tavassoli, F.A.. Nodular hyperplasia, adenoma, and adenomyoma of Bartholin’s gland. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1998; 17(4): 289294.Google Scholar
Heller, D.S., Bean, S.. Lesions of the Bartholin gland: a review. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2014; 18(4): 351357.Google Scholar
Akbarzadeh Jahromi, M., Sari Aslani, F., Samsami Dehghani, A., Mahmoodi, E.. Bartholin’s gland bilateral nodular hyperplasia: a case report study. Iran Red Crescent Med J 2014; 16(6): e8146.Google Scholar
Kazakov, D.V., Curik, R., Vanecek, T., Mukensnabl, P., Michal, M.. Nodular hyperplasia of the Bartholin gland: a clinicopathological study of two cases, including detection of clonality by HUMARA. Am J Dermatopathol 2007; 29(4): 385387.Google Scholar
Baker, G.M., Selim, M.A., Hoang, M.P.. Vulvar adnexal lesions: a 32-year, single-institution review from Massachusetts General Hospital. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2013; 137(9): 12371246.Google Scholar
Kazakov, D.V., Spagnolo, D.V., Kacerovska, D., Michal, M.. Lesions of anogenital mammary-like glands: an update. Adv Anat Pathol 2011; 18(1): 128.Google Scholar
Ho, S.P., Tseng, H.H., King, T.M., Chow, P.C.. Anal phyllodes tumor in a male patient: a unique case presentation and literature review. Diagn Pathol 2013; 8: 49.Google Scholar
van der Putte, S.C.. Mammary-like glands of the vulva and their disorders. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1994; 13(2): 150160.Google Scholar
El-Khoury, J., Renald, M.H., Plantier, F., Avril, M.F., Moyal-Barracco, M.. Vulvar hidradenoma papilliferum (HP) is located on the sites of mammary-like anogenital glands (MLAGs): Analysis of the photographs of 52 tumors. J Am Acad Dermatol 2016; 75(2): 380384.Google Scholar
Woodworth, H., Jr., Dockerty, M.B., Wilson, R.B., Pratt, J.H.. Papillary hidradenoma of the vulva: a clinicopathologic study of 69 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1971; 110(4): 501508.Google Scholar
Scurry, J., van der Putte, S.C., Pyman, J., Chetty, N., Szabo, R.. Mammary-like gland adenoma of the vulva: review of 46 cases. Pathology 2009; 41(4): 372378.Google Scholar
Shah, S.S., Adelson, M., Mazur, M.T.. Adenocarcinoma in situ arising in vulvar papillary hidradenoma: report of 2 cases. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2008; 27(3): 453456.Google Scholar
Vazmitel, M., Spagnolo, D.V., Nemcova, J., Michal, M., Kazakov, D.V.. Hidradenoma papilliferum with a ductal carcinoma in situ component: case report and review of the literature. Am J Dermatopathol 2008; 30(4): 392394.Google Scholar
Bannatyne, P., Elliott, P., Russell, P.. Vulvar adenosquamous carcinoma arising in a hidradenoma papilliferum, with rapidly fatal outcome: case report. Gynecol Oncol 1989; 35(3): 395398.Google Scholar
Ciarloni, L., Frouin, E., Bodin, F., Cribier, B.. Syringoma: a clinicopathological study of 244 cases. Ann Dermatol Venereol 2016; 143(8–9): 521528.Google Scholar
Huang, Y.H., Chuang, Y.H., Kuo, T.T., Yang, L.C., Hong, H.S.. Vulvar syringoma: a clinicopathologic and immunohistologic study of 18 patients and results of treatment. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003; 48(5): 735739.Google Scholar
Cohen, P.R., Tschen, J.A., Rapini, R.P.. Penile syringoma: reports and review of patients with syringoma located on the penis. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol 2013; 6(6): 3842.Google Scholar
Wu, C.Y.. Multifocal penile syringoma masquerading as genital warts. Clin Exp Dermatol 2009; 34(7): e290e291.Google Scholar
Todd, P.S., Gordon, S.C., Rovner, R.L., Tung, R.. Eruptive penile syringomas in an adolescent: novel approach with serial microexcisions and suture-adhesive repair. Pediatr Dermatol 2016; 33(2): e57e60.Google Scholar
Draznin, M.. Hereditary syringomas: a case report. Dermatol Online J 2004; 10(2): 19.Google Scholar
Saitoh, A., Ohtake, N., Fukuda, S., Tamaki, K.. Clear cells of eccrine glands in a patient with clear cell syringoma associated with diabetes mellitus. Am J Dermatopathol 1993; 15(2): 166168.Google Scholar
Kondi-Pafiti, A., Kairi-Vassilatou, E., Spanidou-Carvouni, H., et al. Vascular tumors of the female genital tract: a clinicopathological study of nine cases. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2003; 24(1): 4850.Google Scholar
Papalas, J.A., Sangueza, O.P., Puri, P.K., Robboy, S.J., Selim, M.A.. Vulvar vascular tumors: a clinicopathologic study of 85 patients. Am J Dermatopathol 2013; 35(1): 17; quiz 8–10.Google Scholar
Katona, T.M., Lopez-Beltran, A., MacLennan, G.T., et al. Soft tissue tumors of the penis: a review. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 2006; 28(4): 193206.Google Scholar
Pereira, N., Dormosh, M., Mirmanesh, M., Guilfoil, D.S.. Arteriovenous malformation of the vulva: a case report. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2014; 18(1): E12E15.Google Scholar
Gupta, S., Radotra, B.D., Kumar, B.. Multiple, genital lobular capillary haemangioma (pyogenic granuloma) in a young woman: a diagnostic puzzle. Sex Transm Infect 2000; 76(1): 5152.Google Scholar
Tomasini, C., Puiatti, P., Bernengo, M.G.. Multiple pyogenic granuloma of the penis. Sex Transm Infect 1998; 74(3): 221222.Google Scholar
Gameiro, A., Cardoso, J.C., Calonje, E., Tellechea, O.. Intravascular lobular capillary hemangioma in the corpus spongiosum. Am J Dermatopathol 2016; 38(1): e15e17.Google Scholar
Akbulut, F., Akbulut, T., Kucukdurmaz, F., Huge pyogenic granuloma of the penis. Case Rep Urol 2015; 2015: 263168.Google Scholar
Preece, J., Prasad, V., Schober, M., DaJusta, D.G.. Spontaneous cystic penile vascular malformation in an adolescent and review of the literature. Urology 2016; 97: 197199.Google Scholar
Wang, S., Lang, J.H., Zhou, H.M.. Venous malformations of the female lower genital tract. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009; 145(2): 205208.Google Scholar
Nayyar, S., Liaqat, N., Sultan, N., Dar, S.H.. Cavernous haemangioma mimicking as clitoral hypertrophy. Afr J Paediatr Surg 2014; 11(1): 6566.Google Scholar
Kumar, A., Goyal, N.K., Trivedi, S., Dwivedi, U.S., Singh, P.B.. Primary cavernous hemangioma of the glans penis: rare case report with a review of the literature. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2008; 32(2): 386388.Google Scholar
Yigiter, M., Arda, I.S., Hicsonmez, A.. An unusual cause of paraphimosis: hemangioma of the glans penis. J Pediatr Surg 2008; 43(2): e31e33.Google Scholar
Cebesoy, F.B., Kutlar, I., Aydin, A.. A rare mass formation of the vulva: giant cavernous hemangioma. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2008; 12(1): 3537.Google Scholar
Ergun, O., Ceylan, B.G., Armagan, A., et al. A giant scrotal cavernous hemangioma extending to the penis and perineum: a case report. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2009; 25(10): 559561.Google Scholar
Bava, G.L., Dalmonte, P., Oddone, M., Rossi, U.. Life-threatening hemorrhage from a vulvar hemangioma. J Pediatr Surg 2002; 37(4): E6.Google Scholar
Norouzi, B.B., Shanberg, A.M.. Laser treatment of large cavernous hemangiomas of the penis. J Urol 1998; 160(1): 6062.Google Scholar
Fetsch, J.F., Sesterhenn, I.A., Miettinen, M., Davis, C.J., Jr. Epithelioid hemangioma of the penis: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical analysis of 19 cases, with special reference to exuberant examples often confused with epithelioid hemangioendothelioma and epithelioid angiosarcoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2004; 28(4): 523533.Google Scholar
Gray, H.J., Rendi, M.H., Holmes, M.. Painful clitoromegaly caused by rare epithelioid hemangioma. Gynecol Oncol Case Rep 2012; 4: 6062.Google Scholar
Chang, M.B., Newman, C.C., Davis, M.D., Lehman, J.S.. Acquired lymphangiectasia (lymphangioma circumscriptum) of the vulva: clinicopathologic study of 11 patients from a single institution and 67 from the literature. Int J Dermatol 2016; 55(9): e482e487.Google Scholar
Swanson, D.L.. Genital lymphangioma with recurrent cellulitis in men. Int J Dermatol 2006; 45(7): 800804.Google Scholar
Adikari, S., Philippidou, M., Samuel, M.. A rare case of acquired lymphangioma circumscriptum of the penis. Int J STD AIDS 2017; 28(2): 205207.Google Scholar
Kokcam, I.. Lymphangioma circumscriptum of the penis: a case report. Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Pannonica Adriat 2007; 16(2): 8182.Google Scholar
Errichetti, E., De Francesco, V., Pegolo, E.. Acquired lymphangioma of the penis in a patient with severe phimosis. Int J Dermatol 2015; 54(11): e501e503.Google Scholar
Sharma, C., Bhardwaj, A., Khanuja, E., Singh, G.. Congenital vulvar lymphangioma mimicking genital wart: a rare case. J Obstet Gynaecol 2016; 36(4): 522523.Google Scholar
Gupta, S., Radotra, B.D., Javaheri, S.M., Kumar, B.. Lymphangioma circumscriptum of the penis mimicking venereal lesions. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2003; 17(5): 598600.Google Scholar
Fatima, S., Uddin, N., Idrees, R., et al. Lymphangioma circumscriptum: clinicopathological spectrum of 29 cases. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2015; 25(9): 658661.Google Scholar
McNeely, T.B.. Angiokeratoma of the clitoris. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1992; 116(8): 880881.Google Scholar
Leis-Dosil, V.M., Alijo-Serrano, F., Aviles-Izquierdo, J.A., Lazaro-Ochaita, P., Lecona-Echeverria, M.. Angiokeratoma of the glans penis: clinical, histopathological and dermoscopic correlation. Dermatol Online J 2007; 13(2): 19.Google Scholar
Ghosh, S.K., Ghosh, S., Agarwal, M.. Multiple giant angiokeratoma of Fordyce on the shaft of the penis masquerading as keratoacanthoma. An Bras Dermatol 2015; 90(3 Suppl 1): 150152.Google Scholar
Feramisco, J.D., Fournier, J.B., Zedek, D.C., Venna, S.S.. Eruptive angiokeratomas on the glans penis. Dermatol Online J 2009; 15(10): 14.Google Scholar
Schiller, P.I., Itin, P.H.. Angiokeratomas: an update. Dermatology 1996; 193(4): 275282.Google Scholar
Cohen, P.R., Young, A.W., Jr., Tovell, H.M.. Angiokeratoma of the vulva: diagnosis and review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1989; 44(5): 339346.Google Scholar
Smith, B.L., Chu, P., Weinberg, J.M.. Agiokeratomas of the vulva: possible association with radiotherapy. Skinmed 2004; 3(3): 171172.Google Scholar
Pianezza, M.L., Singh, D., Van der Kwast, T., Jarvi, K.. Rare case of recurrent angiokeratoma of Fordyce on penile shaft. Urology 2006; 68(4): 891e1891e3.Google Scholar
Giudice, L.C., Kao, L.C.. Endometriosis. Lancet 2004; 364(9447): 17891799.Google Scholar
Brug, P., Gueye, N.A., Bachmann, G.. Vulvar endometriosis presenting with dyspareunia: a case report. J Reprod Med 2012; 57(3–4): 175177.Google Scholar
Li, J., Shi, Y., Zhou, C., Lin, J.. Diagnosis and treatment of perineal endometriosis: review of 17 cases. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2015; 292(6): 12951299.Google Scholar
Eyvazzadeh, A.D., Smith, Y.R., Lieberman, R., Quint, E.H.. A rare case of vulvar endometriosis in an adolescent girl. Fertil Steril 2009; 91(3): 929e9929e11.Google Scholar
Buda, A., Ferrari, L., Marra, C., et al. Vulvar endometriosis in surgical scar after excision of the Bartholin gland: report of a case. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2008; 277(3): 255256.Google Scholar
Katz, Z., Goldchmit, R., Blickstein, I.. Post-traumatic vulvar endometriosis. Eur J Pediatr Surg 1996; 6(4): 241242.Google Scholar
Grimstad, F.W., Carey, E.. Periclitoral endometriosis: the dilemma of a chronic disease invading a rare location. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2015; 22(4): 684686.Google Scholar
Su, H.Y., Chen, W.H., Chen, C.H.. Extra-pelvic endometriosis presenting as a vulvar mass in a teenage girl. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2004; 87(3): 252253.Google Scholar
Aydin, Y., Atis, A., Polat, N.. Bilateral endometrioma of Bartholin glands accompanying ovarian endometrioma. J Obstet Gynaecol 2011; 31(2): 187189.Google Scholar
Hemmings, R.. Combined treatment of endometriosis: GnRH agonists and laparoscopic surgery. J Reprod Med 1998; 43(3 Suppl): 316320.Google Scholar
Irvin, W., Pelkey, T., Rice, L., Andersen, W.. Endometrial stromal sarcoma of the vulva arising in extraovarian endometriosis: a case report and literature review. Gynecol Oncol 1998; 71(2): 313316.Google Scholar
Kwon, Y.S., Nam, J.H., Choi, G.. Clear cell adenocarcinoma arising in endometriosis of a previous episiotomy site. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112(2 Pt 2): 475477.Google Scholar
Venkatesan, A.. Pigmented lesions of the vulva. Dermatol Clin 2010; 28(4): 795805.Google Scholar
Rock, B., Hood, A.F., Rock, J.A.. Prospective study of vulvar nevi. J Am Acad Dermatol 1990; 22(1): 104106.Google Scholar
Cengiz, F.P., Emiroglu, N., Wellenhof, R.H.. Dermoscopic and clinical features of pigmented skin lesions of the genital area. An Bras Dermatol 2015; 90(2): 178183.Google Scholar
Rock, B.. Pigmented lesions of the vulva. Dermatol Clin 1992; 10(2): 361370.Google Scholar
Yarak, S., Michalany, N.S., Hienke, T., Stavalae, J.N.. Clinical and histopathological characteristics of genital melanocytic nevi: a report of 109 cases and a review of the literature. J Clin Exp Dermatol Res 2012; 3(5): 14.Google Scholar
Castagnetti, M., Leonard, M., Guerra, L., Esposito, C., Cimador, M.. Benign penile skin anomalies in children: a primer for pediatricians. World J Pediatr 2015; 11(4): 316323.Google Scholar
Val-Bernal, J.F., Val, D., Garijo, M.F.. Clinically unapparent melanocytic nevi on the prepuce. J Cutan Pathol 2009; 36(4): 444447.Google Scholar
Kono, T., Nozaki, M., Kikuchi, Y., et al. Divided naevus of the penis: a hypothesis on the embryological mechanism of its development. Acta Derm Venereol 2003; 83(2): 155156.Google Scholar
Lenane, P., Keane, C.O., Connell, B.O., Loughlin, S.O., Powell, F.C.. Genital melanotic macules: clinical, histologic, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural features. J Am Acad Dermatol 2000; 42(4): 640644.Google Scholar
Cervigon, I., Palomo, A., Torres, L.M.. [Melanotic macules of the penis]. Actas Dermosifiliogr 2007; 98(10): 722723.Google Scholar
Barnhill, R.L., Albert, L.S., Shama, S.K., et al. Genital lentiginosis: a clinical and histopathologic study. J Am Acad Dermatol 1990; 22(3): 453460.Google Scholar
Clark, W.H., Jr., Hood, A.F., Tucker, M.A., Jampel, R.M.. Atypical melanocytic nevi of the genital type with a discussion of reciprocal parenchymal-stromal interactions in the biology of neoplasia. Hum Pathol 1998; 29(1 Suppl 1): S1S24.Google Scholar
Gunthert, A.R., Faber, M., Knappe, G., Hellriegel, S., Emons, G.. Early onset vulvar lichen sclerosus in premenopausal women and oral contraceptives. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008; 137(1): 5660.Google Scholar
Bunker, C.B., Shim, T.N.. Male genital lichen sclerosus. Indian J Dermatol 2015; 60(2): 111117.Google Scholar
Schaffer, J.V., Orlow, S.J.. Melanocytic proliferations in the setting of vulvar lichen sclerosus: diagnostic considerations. Pediatr Dermatol 2005; 22(3): 276278; author reply 278–279.Google Scholar
Fabrizi, G., Pennacchia, I., Pagliarello, C., Massi, G.. Sclerosing nevus with pseudomelanomatous features. J Cutan Pathol 2008; 35(11): 9951002.Google Scholar
Neri, I., Dika, E., Fanti, P.A., Misciali, C., Patrizi, A.. Genital melanocytic naevus on lichen sclerosus: an uncommon occurrence and a management proposal. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2016; 30(5): 794797.Google Scholar
Pinto, A., McLaren, S.H., Poppas, D.P., Magro, C.M.. Genital melanocytic nevus arising in a background of lichen sclerosus in a 7-year-old female: the diagnostic pitfall with malignant melanoma: a literature review. Am J Dermatopathol 2012; 34(8): 838843.Google Scholar
El Shabrawi-Caelen, L., Soyer, H.P., Schaeppi, H., et al. Genital lentigines and melanocytic nevi with superimposed lichen sclerosus: a diagnostic challenge. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004; 50(5): 690694.Google Scholar
Mulcahy, M., Scurry, J., Day, T., Otton, G.. Genital melanocytic naevus and lichen sclerosus. Pathology 2013; 45(6): 616618.Google Scholar
Bussen, S.S.. Melanocytic proliferations associated with lichen sclerosus in adolescence. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2009; 280(6): 10391040.Google Scholar
Carlson, J.A., Mu, X.C., Slominski, A., et al. Melanocytic proliferations associated with lichen sclerosus. Arch Dermatol 2002; 138(1): 7787.Google Scholar
Turnbull, N., Shim, T., Patel, N., Mazzon, S., Bunker, C.. Primary melanoma of the penis in 3 patients with lichen sclerosus. JAMA Dermatol 2016; 152(2): 226227.Google Scholar
O’Connell, J.X., Young, R.H., Nielsen, G.P., et al. Nodular fasciitis of the vulva: a study of six cases and literature review. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1997; 16(2): 117123.Google Scholar
Pichler Sekulic, S., Sekulic, M.. Nodular fasciitis of the vulva: a challenging histopathologic diagnosis supported by the detection of USP6 gene rearrangement. APMIS 2016; 124(6): 534537.Google Scholar
Vecchio, G.M., Miano, A.E., Belfiore, G., et al. Fibrous hamartoma of infancy of the labium majus: a typical lesion in an unusual site. Pathologica 2010; 102(2): 7174.Google Scholar
McCluggage, W.G., Smith, J.H.. Reactive fibroblastic and myofibroblastic proliferation of the vulva (Cyclist’s Nodule): a hitherto poorly described vulval lesion occurring in cyclists. Am J Surg Pathol 2011; 35(1): 110114.Google Scholar
Steeper, T.A., Rosai, J.. Aggressive angiomyxoma of the female pelvis and perineum: report of nine cases of a distinctive type of gynecologic soft-tissue neoplasm. Am J Surg Pathol 1983; 7(5): 463475.Google Scholar
Ahmed, M.A., Uehelie, M.A., Rage, A.M., Mohey, A., Noureldin, Y.A.. Aggressive angiomyxoma of the penis: the first case report in a 9-month-old infant. Urology 2017; 104: 187190.Google Scholar
Rao, K.S., Rao, K.A., Praveen, S.. Aggressive angiomyxoma of scrotum presenting as scrotal lymphedema in a case of postoperative carcinoma penis. Indian J Surg 2015; 77(Suppl 1): 170171.Google Scholar
Sakata, K., Ishikawa, S., Tokue, A., Hirota, N.. Aggressive angiomyxoma of the scrotum. Urol Int 1997; 58(4): 247249.Google Scholar
Foust-Wright, C., Allen, A., Shobeiri, S.A.. Periurethral aggressive angiomyxoma: a case report. Int Urogynecol J 2013; 24(5): 877880.Google Scholar
Zamecnik, M., Michal, M.. Comparison of angiomyofibroblastoma and aggressive angiomyxoma in both sexes: four cases composed of bimodal CD34 and factor XIIIa positive dendritic cell subsets. Pathol Res Pract 1998; 194(10): 736738.Google Scholar
Rawlinson, N.J., West, W.W., Nelson, M., Bridge, J.A.. Aggressive angiomyxoma with t(12;21) and HMGA2 rearrangement: report of a case and review of the literature. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2008; 181(2): 119124.Google Scholar
Tsuji, T., Yoshinaga, M., Inomoto, Y., Taguchi, S., Douchi, T.. Aggressive angiomyxoma of the vulva with a sole t(5;8)(p15;q22) chromosome change. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2007; 26(4): 494496.Google Scholar
Fletcher, C.D., Tsang, W.Y., Fisher, C., Lee, K.C., Chan, J.K.. Angiomyofibroblastoma of the vulva: a benign neoplasm distinct from aggressive angiomyxoma. Am J Surg Pathol 1992; 16(4): 373382.Google Scholar
Laskin, W.B., Fetsch, J.F., Mostofi, F.K.. Angiomyofibroblastomalike tumor of the male genital tract: analysis of 11 cases with comparison to female angiomyofibroblastoma and spindle cell lipoma. Am J Surg Pathol 1998; 22(1): 616.Google Scholar
Ding, G., Yu, Y., Jin, M., Xu, J., Zhang, Z.. Angiomyofibroblastoma-like tumor of the scrotum: a case report and literature review. Oncol Lett 2014; 7(2): 435438.Google Scholar
Hisaoka, M., Kouho, H., Aoki, T., Daimaru, Y., Hashimoto, H.. Angiomyofibroblastoma of the vulva: a clinicopathologic study of seven cases. Pathol Int 1995; 45(7): 487492.Google Scholar
Upreti, S., Morine, A., Ng, D., Bigby, S.M.. Lipomatous variant of angiomyofibroblastoma: a case report and review of the literature. J Cutan Pathol 2015; 42(3): 222226.Google Scholar
Granter, S.R., Nucci, M.R., Fletcher, C.D.. Aggressive angiomyxoma: reappraisal of its relationship to angiomyofibroblastoma in a series of 16 cases. Histopathology 1997; 30(1): 310.Google Scholar
Nielsen, G.P., Young, R.H., Dickersin, G.R., Rosenberg, A.E.. Angiomyofibroblastoma of the vulva with sarcomatous transformation (”angiomyofibrosarcoma”). Am J Surg Pathol 1997; 21(9): 11041108.Google Scholar
Nucci, M.R., Granter, S.R., Fletcher, C.D.. Cellular angiofibroma: a benign neoplasm distinct from angiomyofibroblastoma and spindle cell lipoma. Am J Surg Pathol 1997; 21(6): 636644.Google Scholar
Flucke, U., van Krieken, J.H., Mentzel, T.. Cellular angiofibroma: analysis of 25 cases emphasizing its relationship to spindle cell lipoma and mammary-type myofibroblastoma. Mod Pathol 2011; 24(1): 8289.Google Scholar
Maggiani, F., Debiec-Rychter, M., Vanbockrijck, M., Sciot, R.. Cellular angiofibroma: another mesenchymal tumour with 13q14 involvement, suggesting a link with spindle cell lipoma and (extra)-mammary myofibroblastoma. Histopathology 2007; 51(3): 410412.Google Scholar
McCluggage, W.G., Ganesan, R., Hirschowitz, L., Rollason, T.P.. Cellular angiofibroma and related fibromatous lesions of the vulva: report of a series of cases with a morphological spectrum wider than previously described. Histopathology 2004; 45(4): 360368.Google Scholar
McCluggage, W.G., Perenyei, M., Irwin, S.T.. Recurrent cellular angiofibroma of the vulva. J Clin Pathol 2002; 55(6): 477479.Google Scholar
Chen, E., Fletcher, C.D.. Cellular angiofibroma with atypia or sarcomatous transformation: clinicopathologic analysis of 13 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2010; 34(5): 707714.Google Scholar
Fetsch, J.F., Laskin, W.B., Tavassoli, F.A.. Superficial angiomyxoma (cutaneous myxoma): a clinicopathologic study of 17 cases arising in the genital region. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1997; 16(4): 325334.Google Scholar
Wang, Y.C., Li, X.M., Zhong, G.P., Xing, Z., Wang, Z.P.. Superficial angiomyxoma of penis: a case report of a 6-year follow-up. Asian J Androl 2017; 19(2): 262263.Google Scholar
Kim, H.S., Kim, G.Y., Lim, S.J., Ki, K.D., Kim, H.C.. Giant superficial angiomyxoma of the vulva: a case report and review of the literature. J Cutan Pathol 2010; 37(6): 672677.Google Scholar
Nielsen, G.P., Young, R.H.. Mesenchymal tumors and tumor-like lesions of the female genital tract: a selective review with emphasis on recently described entities. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2001; 20(2): 105127.Google Scholar
Allen, P.W., Dymock, R.B., MacCormac, L.B.. Superficial angiomyxomas with and without epithelial components: report of 30 tumors in 28 patients. Am J Surg Pathol 1988; 12(7): 519530.Google Scholar
Calonje, E., Guerin, D., McCormick, D., Fletcher, C.D.. Superficial angiomyxoma: clinicopathologic analysis of a series of distinctive but poorly recognized cutaneous tumors with tendency for recurrence. Am J Surg Pathol 1999; 23(8): 910917.Google Scholar
Mills, A.M., Longacre, T.A.. Smooth muscle tumors of the female genital tract. Surg Pathol Clin 2009; 2(4): 625677.Google Scholar
Nielsen, G.P., Rosenberg, A.E., Koerner, F.C., Young, R.H., Scully, R.E.. Smooth-muscle tumors of the vulva: a clinicopathological study of 25 cases and review of the literature. Am J Surg Pathol 1996; 20(7): 779793.Google Scholar
Dehner, L.P., Smith, B.H.. Soft tissue tumors of the penis: a clinicopathologic study of 46 cases. Cancer 1970; 25(6): 14311447.Google Scholar
Tavassoli, F.A., Norris, H.J.. Smooth muscle tumors of the vulva. Obstet Gynecol 1979; 53(2): 213217.Google Scholar
Redman, J.F., Liang, X., Ferguson, M.A., Savell, V.H.. Leiomyoma of the glans penis in a child. J Urol 2000; 164(3 Pt 1): 791.Google Scholar
Leoni, S., Prandi, S., Mora, A.. Leiomyoma of the prepuce. Eur Urol 1980; 6(3): 188189.Google Scholar
Liu, S.P., Shun, C.T., Chang, S.J., Chen, J., Hsieh, J.T.. Leiomyoma of the corpus cavernosum of the penis. Int J Urol 2007; 14(3): 257258.Google Scholar
Faber, K., Jones, M.A., Spratt, D., Tarraza, H.M., Jr. Vulvar leiomyomatosis in a patient with esophagogastric leiomyomatosis: review of the syndrome. Gynecol Oncol 1991; 41(1): 9294.Google Scholar
Chokoeva, A.A., Tchernev, G., Cardoso, J.C., et al. Vulvar sarcomas: short guideline for histopathological recognition and clinical management. Part 1. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol 2015; 28(2): 168177.Google Scholar
Aartsen, E.J., Albus-Lutter, C.E.. Vulvar sarcoma: clinical implications. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1994; 56(3): 181189.Google Scholar
Fetsch, J.F., Davis, C.J. Jr., Miettinen, M., Sesterhenn, I.A.. Leiomyosarcoma of the penis: a clinicopathologic study of 14 cases with review of the literature and discussion of the differential diagnosis. Am J Surg Pathol 2004 ;28(1): 115125.Google Scholar
Moses, K.A., Sfakianos, J.P., Winer, A., et al. Non-squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: single-center, 15-year experience. World J Urol 2014; 32(5): 13471353.Google Scholar
Nucci, M.R., Fletcher, C.D.. Vulvovaginal soft tissue tumours: update and review. Histopathology 2000; 36(2): 97108.Google Scholar
Viau, M., Plante, M., Renaud, M.C., Grondin, K., Morin, C.. Proposed novel nomenclature of vulvar smooth muscle tumors; a case of Smooth Muscle Tumor of Uncertain Malignant Potential (STUMP) of the vulva. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2017; 20: 13.Google Scholar
Levy, R.A., Winham, W.M., Bryant, C.S., Quick, C.M.. Smooth muscle neoplasms of the vulva masquerading as Bartholin gland duct cysts. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 2014; 27(1): 2527.Google Scholar
Pratt, R.M., Ross, R.T.. Leiomyosarcoma of the penis: a report of a case. Br J Surg 1969; 56(11): 870872.Google Scholar
Cigna, E., Maruccia, M., Parisi, P., et al. Superficial leiomyosarcoma of the glans: report of a case and literature review. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2013; 37(5): 10521058.Google Scholar
Dominici, A., Delle Rose, A., Stomaci, N., et al. A rare case of leiomyosarcoma of the penis with a reappraisal of the literature. Int J Urol 2004; 11(6): 440444.Google Scholar
Wollina, U., Steinbach, F., Verma, S., Tchernev, G.. Penile tumours: a review. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2014; 28(10): 12671276.Google Scholar
van Bogaert, L.J.. Anogenital lesions: Kaposi’s sarcoma and its mimicks. ISRN AIDS 2012; 2012: 486425.Google Scholar
Woldrich, J.M., Silberstein, J.L., Saltzstein, S.L., Derweesh, I.H., Downs, T.M.. Penile Kaposis sarcoma in the state of California. Can J Urol 2012; 19(2): 61786182.Google Scholar
Laartz, B.W., Cooper, C., Degryse, A., Sinnott, J.T.. Wolf in sheep’s clothing: advanced Kaposi sarcoma mimicking vulvar abscess. South Med J 2005; 98(4): 475477.Google Scholar
Wu, X.J., Pu, X.M., Kang, X.J., et al. One hundred and five Kaposi sarcoma patients: a clinical study in Xinjiang, Northwest of China. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2014; 28(11): 15451552.Google Scholar
Pinto-Almeida, T., Torres, T., Rosmaninho, A., et al. Letter: Penile Kaposi sarcoma: a case of complete resolution with highly active antiretroviral therapy alone. Dermatol Online J 2011; 17(6): 12.Google Scholar
Micali, G., Nasca, M.R., De Pasquale, R., Innocenzi, D.. Primary classic Kaposi’s sarcoma of the penis: report of a case and review. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2003; 17(3): 320323.Google Scholar
Imko-Walczuk, B., Kielbowicz, M., Malyszko, J., et al. Kaposi sarcoma in the genital area in a kidney transplant patient: a case report and literature review. Transplant Proc 2016; 48(5): 18431848.Google Scholar
Hong, S.C., Lim, Y.K., Chew, S.H., Chia, Y.N., Yam, K.L.. Case report of granular cell tumor of the vulva and review of current literature. Gynecol Oncol Case Rep 2012; 3: 2022.Google Scholar
Kondi-Pafiti, A., Kairi-Vassilatou, E., Liapis, A., et al. Granular cell tumor of the female genital system: clinical and pathologic characteristics of five cases and literature review. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2010; 31(2): 222224.Google Scholar
Dema, A., Taban, S., Herman, I., et al. Granular cell tumor of the penis shaft: case report and literature review. Chirurgia (Bucur) 2009; 104(3): 359362.Google Scholar
Laskin, W.B., Fetsch, J.F., Davis, C.J., Jr., Sesterhenn, I.A.. Granular cell tumor of the penis: clinicopathologic evaluation of 9 cases. Hum Pathol 2005; 36(3): 291298.Google Scholar
Kinoshita, H., Okada, K., Nagata, Y., Kawamura, N.. Fibrous histiocytoma of penis. Urology 1985; 25(5): 544546.Google Scholar
Kamble, S.N., Sambarey, P.W.. Benign fibrous histiocytoma of vulva: rare case. J Obstet Gynaecol India 2012; 62(Suppl 1): 8586.Google Scholar
Wehmeijer, L.M., Hage, J.J., Eberz, B., van Beurden, M.. Partially plexiform neurofibroma of the labia minora and clitoral hood: a prognostic dilemma. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2015; 19(3): e55e57.Google Scholar
Kidanto, H.L., Garrison, J., Wangwe, P.. Large neurofibroma of the labia majora: a case report. Tanzan J Health Res 2013; 15(1): 7172.Google Scholar
Cost, N.G., Sanchez, F.S., Weinberg, A.G., Koral, K., Baker, L.A.. Neurofibromatosis presenting as painless clitoromegaly. Urol J 2009; 6(3): 220222.Google Scholar
Lawson Douglas, L., Cadogan, C.A.. Plexiform neurofibroma of the penis and facial nerve. West Indian Med J 2014; 63(2): 195196.Google Scholar
Peters, W.J., Samuel, E.S.. Extensive neurofibromatosis of the abdominal wall, penis and scrotum. Can J Surg 1982; 25(5): 576577.Google Scholar
Gilani, S., Al-Khafaji, B.. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans of the vulva: a mesenchymal tumour with a broad differential diagnosis and review of literature. Pathologica 2014; 106(4): 338341.Google Scholar
Raashid, H., Inaam, Z., Aadil, H., et al. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans of penis: case report and literature review. Urol Ann 2014; 6(3): 258260.Google Scholar
Wu, X., Chen, Z., Ji, H., Duan, G., Zhou, Z.. Angiosarcoma of the penis: a case report and literature review. Int Urol Nephrol 2012; 44(5): 13411343.Google Scholar
Ferguson, S.E., Gerald, W., Barakat, R.R., Chi, D.S., Soslow, R.A.. Clinicopathologic features of rhabdomyosarcoma of gynecologic origin in adults. Am J Surg Pathol 2007; 31(3): 382389.Google Scholar
Mentzel, T., Kuhnen, C.. Spindle cell rhabdomyosarcoma in adults: clinicopathological and immunohistochemical analysis of seven new cases. Virchows Arch 2006; 449(5): 554560.Google Scholar
Guillou, L., Wadden, C., Coindre, J.M., Krausz, T., Fletcher, C.D.. “Proximal-type” epithelioid sarcoma, a distinctive aggressive neoplasm showing rhabdoid features: clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural study of a series. Am J Surg Pathol 1997; 21(2): 130146.Google Scholar
Hasegawa, T., Matsuno, Y., Shimoda, T., et al. Proximal-type epithelioid sarcoma: a clinicopathologic study of 20 cases. Mod Pathol 2001; 14(7): 655663.Google Scholar
Ong, A.C., Lim, T.Y., Tan, T.C., Wang, S., Raju, G.C.. Proximal epithelioid sarcoma of the vulva: a case report and review of current medical literature. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2012; 38(7): 10321035.Google Scholar
Cossu, A., Paliogiannis, P., Capobianco, G., et al. Immunoreactivity for Ca 125 and INI 1 loss of expression are useful markers in the diagnosis of vulvar proximal-type epithelioid sarcomas: report of two cases. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2013; 34(5): 469472.Google Scholar
Parekh, N., Cockrell, E., McMahon, D.. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor of the penis: a case report and review of the literature. Urology 2013; 81(5): 10671068.Google Scholar
Kaur, J., Madan, R., Singh, L., et al. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour of penis. Andrologia 2015; 47(3): 333335.Google Scholar
Lambrou, N.C., Mirhashemi, R., Wolfson, A., Thesiger, P., Penalver, M.. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor of the vulva: a multimodal treatment approach. Gynecol Oncol 2002; 85(2): 365371.Google Scholar
Maglione, M.A., Tricarico, O.D., Calandria, L.. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor of the vulva: a case report. J Reprod Med 2002; 47(9): 721724.Google Scholar
Kudo, E., Hirose, T., Fujii, Y., et al. Undifferentiated carcinoma of the vulva mimicking epithelioid sarcoma. Am J Surg Pathol 1991; 15(10): 9901001.Google Scholar
Seo, I.Y., Oh, T.H., Chuluun, S., Choi, K.H.. Pleomorphic malignant fibrous histiocytoma/undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma of the glans penis. Can Urol Assoc J 2013; 7(11–12): E823E825.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×