Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T07:06:07.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Pain Medicine Education in Anesthesiology Training

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2018

Edwin A. Bowe
Affiliation:
University of Kentucky
Randall M. Schell
Affiliation:
University of Kentucky
Amy N. DiLorenzo
Affiliation:
University of Kentucky
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Education in Anesthesia
How to Deliver the Best Learning Experience
, pp. 81 - 88
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Schwartz, A. J.. Education: An essential leg for anesthesiology’s four-legged stool! Anesthesiology 2010; 112: 35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tetzlaff, J. E.. Assessment of competency in anesthesiology. Anesthesiology 2007; 106: 812–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rebel, A., DiLorenzo, A. N., Fragneto, R. Y. et al. A competitive objective structured clinical examination event to generate an objective assessment of anesthesiology resident skills development. A A Case Rep 2016; 6: 313–19.Google ScholarPubMed
Fishman, S. M., Young, H. M., Arwood, E. Lucas et al. Core competencies for pain management: Results of an interprofessional consensus summit. Pain Med 2013; 14: 971–81.Google Scholar
Mezei, L., Murinson., B. B. Johns Hopkins Pain Curriculum Development Team: Pain education in North American medical schools. J Pain 2011; 12: 1199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neville, A. J.. Problem-based learning and medical education forty years on: A review of its effects on knowledge and clinical performance. Med Princ Pract 2009; 18: 19.Google Scholar
Pradhan, A., Sparano, D., Ananth, C. V.. The influence of an audience response system on knowledge retention: An application to resident education. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: 1827–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chilkoti, G., Mohta, M., Wadhwa, R., Saxena, A. K.. Problem-based learning research in anesthesia teaching: Current status and future perspective. Anesthesiol Res Pract 2014; 2014: 263948.Google ScholarPubMed
Kost, A., Chen, F. M.. Socrates was not a pimp: Changing the paradigm of questioning in medical education. Acad Med 2015; 90: 204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brancati, F. L.. The art of pimping. JAMA 1989; 262: 8990.Google Scholar
Oh, R. C., Reamy, B. V.. The Socratic method and pimping: Optimizing the use of stress and fear in instruction. Virtual Mentor 2014; 16: 182–6.Google Scholar
Desai, S. V., Feldman, L., Brown, L. et al. Effect of the 2011 vs. 2003 duty hour regulation-compliant models on sleep duration, trainee education, and continuity of patient care among internal medicine house staff: A randomized trial. JAMA Intern Med 2013; 173: 649–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kannan, J., Kurup, V.. Blended learning in anesthesia education: Current state and future model. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2012; 25: 692–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kurup, V., Hersey, D.. The changing landscape of anesthesia education: Is flipped classroom the answer? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2013; 26: 726–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramani, S.. Twelve tips to improve bedside teaching. Med Teach 2003; 25: 112–15.Google Scholar
Lehmann, L. S., Brancati, F. L., Chen, M. C. et al. The effect of bedside case presentations on patients’ perceptions of their medical care. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 1150–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carter, D. F.. Man-made man: Anesthesiological medical human simulator. J Assoc Adv Med Instrum 1969; 3: 80–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Plymale, M. A., Sloan, P. A., Johnson, M. et al. Cancer pain education: The use of a structured clinical instruction module to enhance learning among medical students. J Pain Symptom Manage 2000; 20: 411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, H., Kim, R., Perret, D. et al. Improving trainee competency and comfort level with needle driving using simulation training. Pain Med 2016; 17: 670–4.Google Scholar
Kim, Y. H.. Ultrasound phantoms to protect patients from novices. Korean J Pain 2016; 29: 73–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brascher, A. K., Blunk, J. A., Bauer, K. et al. Comprehensive curriculum for phantom-based training of ultrasound-guided intercostal nerve and stellate ganglion blocks. Pain Med 2014; 15: 1647–56.Google Scholar
Vaughan, N., Dubey, V. N., Wee, M. Y., Isaacs, R.. A review of epidural simulators: Where are we today? Med Eng Phys 2013; 35: 1235–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wandner, L. D., Heft, M. W., Lok, B. C. et al. The impact of patients’ gender, race, and age on health care professionals’ pain management decisions: An online survey using virtual human technology. Int J Nurs Stud 2014; 51: 726–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boissoneault, J., Mundt, J. M., Bartley, E. J. et al. Assessment of the influence of demographic and professional characteristics on health care providers’ pain management decisions using virtual humans. J Dent Educ 2016; 80: 578–87.Google Scholar
Hoelzer, B. C., Moeschler, S. M., Seamans, D. P.. Using simulation and standardized patients to teach vital skills to pain medicine fellows. Pain Med 2015; 16: 680–91.Google Scholar
Brenner, G. J., Newmark, J. L., Raemer, D.. Curriculum and cases for pain medicine crisis resource management education. Anesth Analg 2013; 116: 107–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sawyer, T., Eppich, W., Brett-Fleegler, M. et al. More than one way to debrief: A critical review of healthcare simulation debriefing methods. Simul Healthc 2016; 11: 209–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boulet, J. R.. Summative assessment in medicine: The promise of simulation for high-stakes evaluation. Acad Emerg Med 2008; 15: 1017–24.Google Scholar
Neal, J. M., Hsiung, R. L., Mulroy, M. F. et al. ASRA checklist improves trainee performance during a simulated episode of local anesthetic systemic toxicity. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2012; 37: 815.Google Scholar
Fishman, S. M.. Responsible Opioid Prescribing: A Clinician’s Guide. Federation of State Medical Boards. Washington, DC: Waterford Life Sciences; 2014.Google Scholar
Swing, S. R., Clyman, S. G., Holmboe, E. S., Williams, R. G.. Advancing resident assessment in graduate medical education. J Grad Med Educ 2009; 1: 278–86.Google Scholar
Boulet, J. R., Murray, D.. Review article: Assessment in anesthesiology education. Can J Anaesth 2012; 59: 182–92.Google Scholar
Gaiser, R. R.. The teaching of professionalism during residency: Why it is failing and a suggestion to improve its success. Anesth Analg 2009; 108: 948–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishra, A., Catchpole, K., McCulloch, P.. The Oxford NOTECHS System: Reliability and validity of a tool for measuring teamwork behaviour in the operating theatre. Qual Saf Health Care 2009; 18: 104–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fletcher, G., Flin, R., McGeorge, P. et al. Anaesthetists’ Non-Technical Skills (ANTS): Evaluation of a behavioural marker system. Br J Anaesth 2003; 90: 580–8.Google Scholar
Cyna, A. M., Andrew, M. I., Tan, S. G.. Communication skills for the anaesthetist. Anaesthesia 2009; 64: 658–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Semeraro, F., Signore, L., Cerchiari, E. L.. Retention of CPR performance in anaesthetists. Resuscitation 2006; 68: 101–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lingard, L.. Paradoxical truths and persistent myths: Reframing the team competence conversation. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2016; 36(Suppl 1): S19–21.Google Scholar
Onwochei, D. N., Halpern, S., Balki, M.. Teamwork assessment tools in obstetric emergencies: A systematic review. Simul Healthc 2016; 12(3): 165–76.Google Scholar
Vleuten, C. P. van der, Schuwirth, L. W.. Assessing professional competence: From methods to programmes. Med Educ 2005; 39: 309–17.Google ScholarPubMed
Govaerts, M. J., Schuwirth, L. W., Vleuten, C. P. Van der, Muijtjens, A. M.. Workplace-based assessment: Effects of rater expertise. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2011; 16: 151–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feldman, M., Lazzara, E. H., Vanderbilt, A. A., Diazgranados, D.. Rater training to support high-stakes simulation-based assessments. J Continuing Educ Health Prof 2012; 32: 279–86.Google Scholar
Bartman, I., Smee, S., Roy, M.. A method for identifying extreme OSCE examiners. Clin Teach 2013; 10: 2731.Google Scholar
Griswold, S., Ponnuru, S., Nishisaki, A. et al. The emerging role of simulation education to achieve patient safety: Translating deliberate practice and debriefing to save lives. Pediatr Clin North Am 2012; 59: 1329–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×