Arvaniti, A. 1991. ‘The phonetics of Modern Greek rhythm and its phonological implications’. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge

Arvaniti, A. 1992. ‘Secondary stress: evidence from Modern Greek’, pp 398–419 of Papers in laboratory phonology, Vol. 2: Gesture, segment, prosody, edited by G. Docherty and D. R. Ladd. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Arvaniti, A. and Joseph, B. 2000. ‘Variation in voiced stop prenasalization in Greek’, Glossologia, A Greek Journal for General and Historical Linguistics 11–12. 131–66 (preliminary version in Ohio State Working Papers in Linguistics 52.203–33 (1999))

Delopoulos, G. 1977. ‘To vório iÐíoma sti mesimvriní rosía’ [‘The northern dialect in southern Russia’], pp 263–304 of A’ Simbósio γlosolojías tu vorioelaÐikú xóru. Thessaloniki: Institute for Balkan Studies

Everett, D. 1996. Why there are no clitics: an alternative perspective on pronominal allomorphy. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics

Everett, D. 2000. ‘Why there are no clitics: on the storage, insertion, and form of [phi]-features’, pp 91–114 of Lexical specification and insertion, edited by P. Coopmans, M. Everaert and J. Grimshaw. Amsterdam: John Benjamins

Ferguson, C. 1959. ‘Diglossia’, Word 15.325–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hock, H. 1976. ‘Review Article on Anttila 1972’, Language 52.202–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joseph, B. 1988. ‘Pronominal affixes in Modern Greek: the case against clisis’, pp 203–15 of Papers from the 24th Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, edited by L. MacLeod, G. Larson and D. Brentari. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society

Joseph, B. 1989. ‘I erminía merikón voríon típon tis prostaktikís katá ti simeriní morfolojikí θeoría [‘The interpretation of several northern forms of the imperative according to current morphological theory’], Eliniki Dialektolojía 1. 21–6Google Scholar

Joseph, B. 1990. ‘The benefits of morphological classification: on some apparently problematic clitics in Modern Greek’, pp 171–181 of Contemporary morphology, edited by W. Dressler, H. Luschützky, O. Pfeiffer and J. Rennison. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Joseph, B. 1994. ‘On weak subjects and pro-drop in Greek’, pp 21–32 of Themes in Greek linguistics (Papers from the First International Conference on Greek Linguistics, Reading, September 1993), edited by I. Philippaki-Warburton, K. Nicolaidis and M. Sifianou. Amsterdam: John Benjamins

Joseph, B. 2001a. ‘Is there such a thing as “Grammaticalization”?’, Language Sciences (Special Issue – Grammaticalization: a critical assessment, edited by L. Campbell) 23(2–3).163–86

Joseph, B. 2001b. ‘Dialect evidence bearing on the definition of “word” in Greek’, in Proceedings of First International Conference on Greek Dialects and Linguistic Theory. Patras: Department of Philology, University of Patras

Joseph, B. 2001c. ‘Is Balkan comparative syntax possible?’, pp 17–43 of Comparative Syntax of Baltic Languages, edited by M. Rivero and A. Ralli. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Joseph, B. 2002. ‘Morphologization from syntax’, in Handbook of historical linguistics, edited by B. Joseph and R. Janda. Oxford: Blackwell

Joseph, B. forthcoming a. ‘Defining “word” in Modern Greek: a response to Philippaki-Warburton and Spyropoulos 1999’. To appear in Yearbook of Morphology, 2001

Joseph, B. forthcoming b. The Modern Greek weak subject pronoun to ς– its origins and implications for language change and language structure: a study in grammatical change, to appear in Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft series, Universität Innsbruck

Joseph, B. and Janda, R. 1999. ‘The Modern Greek negator μν (ⅴ)(-) as a morphological constellation’, pp 341–51 of Greek linguistics: proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Greek Linguistics. Athens: Elinika Gramata

Joseph, B. and Philippaki-Warburton, I. 1987. Modern Greek. London: Croom Helm

Kazazis, K. 1992. ‘Sunday Greek revisited’, Journal of Modern Greek Studies 10(1).57–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koerner, E. F. K. and Asher, R. E. 1995. Editors of Concise history of the language sciences: from the Sumerians to the cognitivists. New York: Pergamon

Lausberg, H. 1956–62. Romanische Sprachwissenschaft. Berlin: de Gruyter

Lyons, J. 1968. Introduction to theoretical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Nespor, M. and Vogel, I. 1986. Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris

Nevis, J. and Joseph, B. 1993. ‘Wackernagel affixes: evidence from Balto-Slavic’, Yearbook of Morphology 1992.93–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nevis, J., Joseph, B. Wanner, D. and Zwicky, A. 1994. Clitics: a comprehensive bibliography 1892–1991, Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science, Series V: Library & Information Sources in Linguistics 22. Amsterdam: John Benjamins

Newton, B. 1972. ‘The dialect geography of Modern Greek passive inflections’, Glotta 50(3–4).262–89Google Scholar

Philippaki-Warburton, I. and Spyropoulos, V. 1999. ‘On the boundaries of inflection and syntax: Greek pronominal clitics and particles’, Yearbook of Morphology 1998 45–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Posner, R. 1996. The Romance languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Rivero, M-L. 1992. ‘Adverb incorporation and the syntax of adverbs in Modern Greek’, Linguistics and Philosophy 15.289–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robins, R. H. 1993. The Byzantine grammarians: their place in history, Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 70. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Smirniotopoulos, J. and Joseph, B. 1998. ‘Syntax versus the lexicon: incorporation and compounding in Modern Greek’, Journal of Linguistics 34.447–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wang, W. 1969. ‘Competing changes as a cause of residue’, Language 45.9–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zwicky, A. 1985. ‘Clitics and particles’, Language 61(2).283–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zwicky, A. 1994. ‘What is a clitic?’, pp ⅻ–ⅹⅹ of Nevis et al., 1994

Zwicky, A. and Pullum, G. 1983. ‘Cliticization vs. inflection: English n't’. Language 59(3).502–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar