Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T03:48:34.921Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Sex and the age of onset of delinquency and conduct disorder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Terrie E. Moffitt
Affiliation:
University of London
Avshalom Caspi
Affiliation:
University of London
Michael Rutter
Affiliation:
University of London
Phil A. Silva
Affiliation:
University of Otago, New Zealand
Get access

Summary

Of all the developmental parameters of antisocial behaviour, perhaps the most extensively studied has been the age at which it begins (LeBlanc and Loeber, 1998). An exhaustive review by Farrington and eight expert colleagues (Farrington, Loeber, Elliott, et al., 1990) precludes the need for us to review this large literature here. It can be summarised by the welldocumented observation that early onset of antisocial behaviour problems is the single best predictor of serious adult criminal outcomes. Despite the importance of age of onset for theory and prevention planning, we found no published systematic comparisons of sex differences in this important variable. Unpublished sex comparisons of onset are cited by Elliott (1994) who mentioned that fewer girls than boys initiated self-reported serious offending at every age, and by Weiner and Wolfgang (1989) who mentioned that more girls than boys were first registered by police before age 14. Because these reports are unpublished, and seem to conflict, this chapter compares the sexes on age of onset.

Sex comparisons of onset age are interesting because it is possible to make opposing predictions about what the results might be. On the one hand, if, as we have seen, girls compared to boys have less extreme antisocial behaviour, or less aetiological press toward antisocial behaviour, we might expect girls would show onset at older ages on average.

Type
Chapter
Information
Sex Differences in Antisocial Behaviour
Conduct Disorder, Delinquency, and Violence in the Dunedin Longitudinal Study
, pp. 81 - 89
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×