Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T04:15:10.650Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Sex differences in the effects of antisocial behaviour on young adult outcomes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Terrie E. Moffitt
Affiliation:
University of London
Avshalom Caspi
Affiliation:
University of London
Michael Rutter
Affiliation:
University of London
Phil A. Silva
Affiliation:
University of Otago, New Zealand
Get access

Summary

In chapters 8 and 9 we saw evidence that the aetiology of adolescent antisocial behaviour may be more similar than different for males and females. But aetiological similarity does not preclude males and females, once they are involved in antisocial behaviour, from developing different outcomes. As one example of this divergence, chapter 11 showed that once involved in antisocial behaviour, females but not males are at risk for adult depression. In this chapter, we examine whether antisocial problems in boys and girls predict the same or different outcomes in adulthood.

One possibility is that a history of antisocial behaviour has fewer negative consequences for females than for males. A reason for this expectation has to do with the pressure of social norms. Evidence for the influence of sexrole norms on outcomes emerged from the Fels Research Institute studies (Kagan and Moss, 1962). A number of continuities were found from childhood to adulthood, but they were related to the sex of the individual and the sex-appropriateness of the behaviours being assessed. For example, passivity and dependency showed continuity for female subjects but not for male subjects, whereas aggression showed continuity for male subjects but not for female subjects. These findings suggest that individuals who deviate from socially and culturally expected patterns of behaviour are often disliked and are thus likely to be coerced into more modal patterns – what Cattell (1973) has called ‘coercion to the biosocial mean’.

Type
Chapter
Information
Sex Differences in Antisocial Behaviour
Conduct Disorder, Delinquency, and Violence in the Dunedin Longitudinal Study
, pp. 159 - 183
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×