References

Susan Rose-Ackerman

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511510342.015

Access Initiative. 2002. Hungarian Report, Part I and II. http://www.accessinitiative.org/hungary.html

Adserá, Alicia, Boix, Carles, and Payne, Mark. 2003. Are You Being Served? Political Accountability and Quality of Government, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 19: 445–490CrossRef Google Scholar

Arato, Andrew. 1994. Constitution and Continuity in the Eastern European Transitions, in Irena Grudzińska-Gross, ed., Amsterdam: Slovak Committee of the European Cultural Foundation, pp. 155–171

Arato, Andrew. 2000. Civil Society, Constitution, and Legitimacy, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield

Arcimowicz, Jolanta. 2001. Urząd Rzecznika Praw Obywatelskich w Polsce [The Office of the Ombudsman in Poland], Warsaw: The College of Social Sciences and Administration of the Warsaw University of Technology

Armstrong, Kenneth. 2002. Rediscovering Civil Society: The European Union and the White Paper on Governance, European Law Journal 8: 102–132CrossRef Google Scholar

Asimov, Michael. 1992. California Underground Regulations, Administrative Law Review 44: 43–77Google Scholar

Bailey, David, and Propris, Lisa. 2004. A Bridge too Phare? EU Pre-Accession Aid and Capacity Building in the Candidate Countries, Journal of Common Market Studies 42: 77–98CrossRef Google Scholar

Balázs, István. 1993. The Transformation of Hungarian Public Administration, in Joachim Jens Hesse, ed., Administrative Transformation in Central and Eastern Europe: Toward Public Sector Reform in Post-Communist Societies, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 75–88

Barnard, Catherine. 2002. The Social Partners and the Governance Agenda, European Law Journal 8: 80–101CrossRef Google Scholar

Beetham, David, ed. 1994. Defining and Measuring Democracy, London: Sage

Beierle, Thomas C., and Jerry Cayford. 2002. Democracy in Practice: Public Participation in Environmental Decisions, Washington, DC: Resources for the Future

Bercusson, B. 1999. Democratic Legitimacy and European Labor Law, Industrial Law Journal 28: 153–170CrossRef Google Scholar

Bernard, Nick. 2000. Legitimating EU: Law: Is the Social Dialogue the Way Forward? Some Reflections Around the UEAPME Case, in Jo Shaw, ed., Social Law and Policy in an Evolving European Union, Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 279–302

Besley, Timothy, and Andrea Prat. 2004. Handcuffs for the Grabbing Hand? Media Capture and Government Accountability, London: London School of Economics. http://econ.lse.ac.uk/staff/prat/papers/media.pdf

Bignami, Francesca. 2003. The Challenge of Cooperative Regulatory Relations after Enlargement, draft, Durham, NC: Duke University School of Law

Böröcz, József, and Melinda Kovács, eds. 2001. Empire's New Clothes: Unveiling EU Enlargement, Telford, UK: Central European Review. http://www.rci.rutgers.edu/~eu/Empire.pdf

Boulanger, Christian. 2002. Europeanisation Through Judicial Activism? The Hungarian Constitutional Court, presented at Contours of Legitimacy Conference, European Studies Center, St. Anthony's College, Oxford University, May 24–25

Bowen, Jeff, and Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 2003. Partisan Politics and Executive Accountability: Argentina in Comparative Perspective, Supreme Court Economic Review 10: 157–211CrossRef Google Scholar

Bozóki, András. ed. 2002. The Roundtable Talks of 1989. The Genesis of Hungarian Democracy, Budapest: CEU Press

Brunner, Georg. 2000. Structure and Proceedings of the Hungarian Constitutional Judiciary, in László Sólyom and Georg Brunner, eds., Constitutional Judiciary in a New Democracy: The Hungarian Constitutional Court, Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 65–102

Brunnetti, Aymo, and Weder, Beatrice. 2003. A Free Press Is Bad for Corruption, Journal of Public Economics 87: 1801–1824CrossRef Google Scholar

Brzeziński, Marek, and Garlicki, Lech. 1995. Judicial Review in Post-Communist Poland: The Emergence of a Rechstaat?Journal of International Law 31/1: 13–59Google Scholar

Buchowski, Michael. 1996. The Shifting Meaning of Civil and Civic Society in Poland, in Chris Hann and Elizabeth Dunn, eds., Civil Society: Challenging Western Models, London: Routledge, pp. 79–98

Buonanno, Laurie, Zablotney, Sharon, and Keefer, Richard. 2001. Politics Versus Science in the Making of the New Regulatory Regime for Food in Europe, European Integration Online Papers 5(12). http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texts/2001-012a.htmGoogle Scholar

Caddy, Joanne. 2000. Implementation of EU Environmental Policy in Central European Applicant States: The Case of EIA, in Christoph Knill and Andrea Lenschow, eds., Implementing EU Environmental Policy, New Directions and Old Problems, Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 197–221

Cameron, David. 2002. The Challenges of EU Accession for Post-Communist Europe, presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Boston, August

Carius, Alexander, Ingmar von Homeyer, and Stefani Bär. 2000. The Eastern Enlargement of the European Union and Environmental Policy: Challenges, Expectations, Multiple Speeds and Flexibility, in Katharina Holzinger and Peter Knoepfel, eds., Environmental Policy in a European Union of Variable Geometry? The Challenge of the Next Enlargement, Basel: Helbing & Lichtenhahn, pp. 141–180

Cirtautas, Arista Maria. 2001. Corruption and the New Ethical Infrastructure of Capitalism, East European Constitutional Review 10(2/3): 79–84Google Scholar

Coglianese, Cary. 1994. Challenging the Rules: Litigation and Bargaining in the Administrative Process, Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Dissertation Services

Coglianese, Cary. 1997. Assessing Consensus: The Promise and Performance of Negotiated Rulemaking, Duke Law Journal 46: 1255–1349CrossRef Google Scholar

Coglianese, Cary. 2001. Assessing the Advocacy of Negotiated Rulemaking: A Response to Philip Harter, New York University Environmental Law Journal 9: 386–447Google Scholar

Coglianese, Cary. 2003. Is Satisfaction Success? Evaluating Public Participation in Regulatory Policymaking, in Rosemary O'Leary and Lisa B. Bingham, eds., The Promise and Performance of Environmental Conflict Resolution, Washington, DC: Resources for the Future Press, pp. 69–86

Collier, David, and Adcock, Robert. 1999. Democracy and Dichotomies: A Pragmatic Approach to Choices about Concepts, Annual Review of Political Science 2: 537–565CrossRef Google Scholar

Commission of the European Communities. 2001a. 2001 Regular Report on Hungary's Progress Towards Accession, SEC(2001) 1748, Brussels, Nov. 13. http://europa.eu.int/comm/enlargement/report2001/hu_en.pdf

Commission of the European Communities. 2001b. 2001 Regular Report on Poland's Progress Toward Accession, SEC(2001) 1752, Brussels, Nov. 13. http://europa.eu.int/comm/enlargement/report2001/pl_en.pdf

Commission of the European Communities. 2001c. White Paper on Governance, COM(2001) 428 final, Brussels: European Union. http://europa.eu.int/comm/governance/white_paper/index_en.htm

Commission of the European Communities. 2002a. 2002 Regular Report on Hungary's Progress Towards Accession, COM(2002) 700 final, SEC(2002) 1404

Commission of the European Communities. 2002b. 2002 Regular Report on Poland's Progress Towards Accession, COM(2002) 700 final, SEC(2002) 1408

Commission of the European Communities. 2003a. Comprehensive Monitoring Report on Hungary's Preparations for Membership, 2003. http://europa.eu.int/comm/enlargement/report_2003/index.htm

Commission of the European Communities. 2003b. Comprehensive Monitoring Report on Poland's Preparations for Membership, 2003. http://europa.eu.int/comm/enlargement/report/2003/index.htm

Constitution Watch: Hungary. 2001a. East European Constitutional Rev. 10(1): 20–22

Constitution Watch: Hungary. 2001b. East European Constitutional Rev. 10(2/3): 20–23

Constitution Watch: Poland. 2000. East European Constitutional Rev. 9(1/2): 28–31

Constitution Watch: Poland. 2001a. East European Constitutional Rev. 10(1): 30–32

Constitution Watch: Poland. 2001b. East European Constitutional Rev. 10(2/3): 32–35

Cook, Linda J., and Mitchell Orenstein. 1999. The Return of the Left and Its Impact on the Welfare State in Russia, Poland and Hungary, in Linda J. Cook, Mitchell A. Orenstein, and Marilyn Rueschemeyer, eds., Left Parties and Social Policy in Postcommunist Europe, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 47–108

Crews Jr., Clyde Wayne. 2002. Ten Thousand Commandments: An Annual Snapshot of the Federal Regulatory State, Washington, DC: The Cato Institute

Csepeli, Gyögy, Antal Örkény, Mária Székelyi, and Ildikó Barna. 2004. Blindness to Success: Social Psychological Objectives Along the Way to a Market Economy in Eastern Europe, in János Kornai, Bo Rothstein, and Susan Rose-Ackerman, eds., Creating Social Trust in Post-Socialist Transition. New York: Palgrave, pp. 213–240

Culhane, Paul J. 1981. Public Lands Politics: Interest Group Influence on the Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press (for Resources for the Future)

Czeszejko-Sochacki, Zdzisław. 1999. The Procuracy and Its Problems: Poland, East European Constitutional Review 8(1/2): 90–95Google Scholar

Dąbrowska, Justyna, Marta Gumowska, Jakub Wygnański. 2003. Wolontariat, Filantropia i 1% – Raport z Badania [Volunteerism, Philanthropy and 1% – 2003 Research Results], Warsaw: Klon/Jawor Association 2003

Dąbrowska, Justyna, Marta Gumowska, Jakub Wygnański. 2002. NGOs in Poland – 2002 Research Results, Warsaw: Klon/Jawor Association

Dahl, Robert. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press

Dahl, Robert. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press

Dekker, Paul, Peter Ester, and Henk Vinken. 2003. Civil Society, Social Trust and Democratic Involvement, The Cultural Diversity of European Unity: Findings, Explanations and Reflections from the European Values Study, Leiden: Brill, pp. 217–253

Dix, Alexander. 2001. The Influence of Hungarian Freedom of Information Legislation Abroad – The Brandenburg Example and Experience, in László Majtényi, ed., The Door onto the Other Side: A Report on Information Rights, Budapest: Adatvédelmi Biztos Irodája, pp. 231–238

Djankov, Simeon, McLiesh, Caralee, Nenova, Tatiana, and Shleifer, Andrei. 2003. Who Owns the Media?Journal of Law and Economics 46: 341–381CrossRef Google Scholar

Dorf, Michael C., and Sabel, Charles. 1998. A Constitution of Democratic Experimentation, Columbia Law Review 98: 267–473CrossRef Google Scholar

Dunn, Delmer D. 1999. Mixing Elected and Nonelected Officials in Democratic Policy Making: Fundamentals of Accountability and Responsibility, in Adam Przeworski, Susan C. Stokes, and Bernard Manin, eds., Democratic Accountability and Representation, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 297–326

Ekiert, Grzegorz, and Jan Kubik. 1999. Rebellious Civil Society: Popular Protest and Democratic Consolidation in Poland, 1989–1993, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press

Elster, Jon. 1997. Afterward: The Making of Postcommunist Presidencies, in Raymond Taras, ed., Postcommunist Presidencies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 225–237

Elster, Jon, Claus Offe, and Ulrich Preuss. 1998. Institutional Design in Post-Communist Societies: Rebuilding the Ship at Sea, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

Engel, Kirsten, and Susan Rose-Ackerman. 2001. Environmental Federalism in the United States: The Risks of Devolution, in Daniel C. Esty and Damien Geradin, eds., Regulatory Competition and Economic Integration, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 135–153

Environmental Management and Law Association. 2002. Identified Legal, Institutional, and Practical Barriers to Public Access to Environmental Information to Support Public Involvement in Hungary for Danube Pollution Reduction Goals, draft, Budapest: EMLA

Eriksen, Erik Oddvar, and John Erik Fossum, eds. 2000. Democracy in the European Union: Integration Through Deliberation? London: Routledge

European Ombudsman. 2003. Annual Report 2002, Strasbourg. http://www.euro-ombudsman.eu.int

Farkas, István. 2002. Hungarian Situation on Public Participation in Regional Development, in Petr Pelcl, ed., Public Participation in Regional Development in Central Europe, Aarhus Convention and Regional Development Project. Regional Environmental Center, Szentendre: Hungary, pp. 57–67

F⊘llesdal, Andreas. 2000. Subsidiarity and Democratic Deliberation, in Erik Oddvar Eriksen and John Erik Fossum, eds., Democracy in the European Union: Integration through Deliberation? London: Routledge, pp. 85–110

Friesema, H. Paul, and Paul, J. Culhane. 1976. Social Impacts, Politics, and the Environmental Impact Statement Process, Natural Resources Journal 16: 338–356Google Scholar

Fritschler, A. Lee. 1989. Smoking and Politics: Policymaking and the Federal Bureaucracy, 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall

Frost, Amanda. 2003. Restoring Faith in Government: Transparency Reform in the United States and the European Union, European Public Law 9: 87–104Google Scholar

Furlong, Scott R., and Cornelius, M. Kerwin. 2005. Interest Group Participation in Rulemaking: What Has Changed in Ten Years?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, in pressGoogle Scholar

Füzér, Katalin. 2002. Wirtschaftlicher Notstand: Konstitutionalismus und ökonomischer Diskurs im postkommunistischen Ungarn. (translated from English by Jasna Miletic), in Christian Boulanger, ed., Recht in der Transfomation. Rechts-und Verfassungswandel in Mittel-und Osteuropa, Berlin: Berliner Debatte Wissenschaftsverlag, pp. 173–195

Gal, Susan, and Gail Kligman. 2000. The Politics of Gender after Socialism, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

Galligan, Denis J., Richard, H. Langan, and Constance, S. Nicandrou. 1998. Administrative Justice in the New European Democracies: Case Studies of Administrative Law and Process in Bulgaria, Estonia, Hungary, Poland and Ukraine, Budapest: Open Society Institute/Constitutional and Legal Policy Institute and Centre for Socio-Legal Studies, University of Oxford

Galligan, Denis J, and Daniel, M. Smilov. 1999. Administrative Law in Central and Eastern Europe 1996–1998, Budapest: Central European University Press

Garlicki, Leszek. 2002. Polskie Prawo Konstytucyjne (Polish Constitutional Law), Warsaw: Liber

Gill, Graeme. 2002. Democracy and Post-Communism, London: Routledge

Gilowska, Zyta. 2001. Reforma Finansów Publicznych [Public Finance Reform], in Grzegorz Gorzelak, Bohdan Jałowiecki, Mirosław Stec eds., Reforma Terytorialnej Administracji Kraju [Reform of the National Territorial State Administration], Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe “Scholar,” pp. 73–102

Gliński, Piotr. 2001. The Ecological Movement as the Element of the Civil Society, in Helena Flam, ed., Pink, Purple, Green: Women's, Religious, Environmental and Gay/Lesbian Movements in Central Europe Today, Boulder, CO: East European Monographs, pp. 112–168

Gliński, Piotr. 2002. The Shaping of Civil Society in Poland: The Trend and an Outlook, in Hans-Peter Meier-Dallach and Jakob Juchler, eds., Postsocialist Transformation and Civil Society in a Globalized World, New York: Nova Science Publications, pp. 57–74

Golden, Marissa Martino. 1998. Interest Groups in the Rule-making Process: Who Participates? Whose Voices Get Heard?Journal of Public Administration and Theory 8: 245–270CrossRef Google Scholar

Gorges, Michael J. 1996. Euro-Corporatism? Interest Intermediation in the European Community, Lanham, MD: University Press of America

Gorzelak, Grzegorz, Marek Kozak, and Wojciech Roszkowski. 1998. Regional Development Agencies in Poland, in Henrik Halkier, Mike Danson, and Charlotte Damborg, eds., Regional Development Agencies in Europe, London: Jessica Kingsley, pp. 104–124

Green, Andrew J. 1997. Public Participation and Environmental Policy Outcomes, Canadian Public Policy 23: 435–458CrossRef Google Scholar

Green, Andrew J. 1999. Public Participation Federalism and Environmental Law, Buffalo Environmental Law Journal Spring, 169–213Google Scholar

Greskovits, Béla. 1998. The Political Economy of Protest and Patience, Budapest: Central European University Press

Grzymała-Busse, Anna. 2002. Redeeming the Communist Past: The Regeneration of Communist Parties in East Central Europe, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

Grzymała-Busse, Anna. 2003. Political Competition and the Politicization of the State in East Central Europe, Comparative Political Studies 20: 126–151Google Scholar

Grzymała-Busse, Anna, and Luong, Pauline Jones. 2002. Reconceptualizing the State: Lessons from Post-Communism, Politics and Society 30: 529–554CrossRef Google Scholar

Haemer, Robert B. 1999. Reform of the Toxic Substances Control Act: Achieving Balance in the Regulation of Toxic Chemicals, Environmental Lawyer, September, 99–134Google Scholar

Halkier, Henrik, Mike Danson, and Charlotte Damborg, eds. 1998. Regional Development Agencies in Europe, London: Jessica Kingsley

Hańderek, Piotr. 2002. Current Situation of Regional Development in Poland, in Petr Pelcl, ed., Public Participation in Regional Development in Central Europe, Aarhus Convention and Regional Development Project. Regional Environmental Center, Szentendre: Hungary, pp. 48–56

Harper, Krista M. 1999. From Green Dissidents to Green Skeptics: Environmental Activists and Post-Socialist Political Ecology in Hungary, dissertation submitted to the Department of Anthropology, University of California, Santa Cruz; Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Dissertation Services

Heinemann, Friedrich. 2002. The Political Economy of EU Enlargement and the Treaty of Nice, European Journal of Political Economy 19: 17–31CrossRef Google Scholar

Hendee, John C. 1977. Public Involvement in the U.S. Forest Service Roadless-area Review: Lessons from a Case Study, in W. R. Derrick Sewell and J. T. Coppock, eds., Public Participation in Planning, London: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 89–103

Henne, Thomas. 2003. Book Review: Environmental Policy in Germany and the United States: Controlling Environmental Policy by Susan Rose-Ackerman, American Journal of Comparative Law 51: 207–228CrossRef Google Scholar

Héthy, Lajos. 1994. Tripartism in Eastern Europe, in Richard Hyman and Anthony Ferner, eds., New Frontiers in European Industrial Relations, Oxford: Blackwell Business, pp. 312–336

Héthy, Lajos. 1995. Anatomy of a Tripartite Experiment: Attempted Social and Economic Agreement in Hungary, International Labor Review 134: 361–376Google Scholar

Héthy, Lajos. 2001. Social Dialogue and the Expanding World: The Decade of Tripartism in Hungary and in Central and Eastern Europe 1988–99, Report 70, Brussels: European Trade Union Institute

Hines, Frances. 2000. Co-operation and Shared Responsibility: New Challenges for Environmental Policy in Eastern Europe, in Katharina Holzinger and Peter Knoepfel, eds., Environmental Policy in a European Union of Variable Geometry? The Challenge of the Next Enlargement, Basel: Helbing & Lichtenhahn, pp. 287–316

Howard, Marc Morjé. 2003. The Weakness of Civil Society in Post-Communist Europe, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

Hungarian National Environmental Council, Secretariat. 2002. Hungarian National Environmental Council 2000–2001, Budapest

Hungary. 1998. Act XX of 1949 as Amended: Constitution of the Republic of Hungary. Available in English in László Sólyom and Georg Brunner, eds., Constitutional Judiciary in a New Democracy: The Hungarian Constitutional Court, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 379–406. Current version at http://archiv.meh.hu/nekh/Angol/6-1-1.htm

Hungary, Központi Statisztikai Hivatal [Central Statistical Office]. 2000. Környezetvédelmi Célú Nonprofit Szervezetek [Environmental Nonprofit Organizations] Budapest

Hungary, Központi Statisztikai Hivatal [Central Statistical Office]. 2002. Nonprofit Szervezetek Magyarországon 2000. Budapest. http://www.ksh.hu/pls/ksh/docs/index_eng.html

Hungary, Miniszterelnöki Hivatal. 2000. Government and Public Administration in Hungary, Budapest

Hungary, State Audit Office. 2002a. The State Audit Office, Budapest

Hungary, State Audit Office. 2002b. The State Audit Office Strategy, Budapest

Hungary, State Audit Office. 2002c. Control and Fighting against Corruption in a Global World – Considering the Hungarian Experience, Budapest, June

Iankova, Elena. 1997. Social Partnership after the Cold War: The Transformative Corporatism of Eastern Europe, in John Brady, ed., Central and Eastern Europe – Industrial Relations and the Market Economy, Dublin: Oak Tree Press, pp. 37–78

Iankova, Elena. 2002. Eastern European Capitalism in the Making, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

Iankova, Elena, and Turner, Lowell. 2004. Building the New Europe: Western and Eastern Roads to Social Partnership, Industrial Relations Journal 35: 76–92CrossRef Google Scholar

Izdebski, Hubert, and Michal Kulesza. 1999. Administracja Publiczna: Zagadnienia Ogólne (Public Administration: General Issues), Warsaw: Liber

Jaggers, Keith, and Gurr, Ted Robert. 1995. Tracking Democracy's Third Wave and the Polity III Data, Journal of Peace Research 32: 469–482CrossRef Google Scholar

Jancar-Webster, Barbara. 1998. Environmental Movement and Social Change in the Transition Countries, Environmental Politics 7: 69–90CrossRef Google Scholar

Jann, Werner. 2003. Public Administration 81: 95–118

Jasiewicz, Krzysztof. 1997. Wałęsa's Legacy to the Presidency, in Ray Tares, ed., Postcommunist Presidents, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 130–167

Jenkins, Robert M. 1999. The Role of the Hungarian Nonprofit Sector in Postcommunist Social Policy, in Linda J. Cook, Mitchell A. Orenstein, and Marilyn Rueschemeyer, eds., Left Parties and Social Policy in Postcommunist Europe, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 175–206

Joerges, Christian. 2001. “Deliberative Supernationalism” – A Defense, European Integration Online Papers 5 (8): 1–11. http://eiop.or.at./eiop/texts/2001-008a.htmGoogle Scholar

Joerges, Christian, and Renaud Dehousse. 2002. Good Governance in Europe's Integrated Markets, Oxford: Oxford University Press

Joerges, Christian, Yves Mény, and J. H. H. Weiler, eds. 2001. Mountain or Molehill? A Critical Appraisal of the Commission's White Paper on Governance, Florence, Italy: Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, European University Institute

Joerges, Christian, and Neyer, Jürgen. 1997. From Intergovernmental Bargaining to Deliberative Political Processes: The Constitutionalisation of Comitology, European Law Journal 3: 273–299CrossRef Google Scholar

Joerges, Christian, and Ellen Vos, eds. 1999. EU Committees: Social Regulation, Law, and Politics, Oxford: Hart Publishing

Johnson, Nevil. 1983. State and Government in the Federal Republic of Germany, Oxford: Pergamon

Jovanović, Miroslav N. 2000. Eastern Enlargement of the European Union: Sour Grapes or Sweet Lemon? Draft. Geneva: UN Commission of Europe, Trade Division

Karatnycky, Adrian, Alexander Motyl, and Boris Shor. 1997. Nations in Transit – 1997: Civil Society, Democracy and Market in East Central Europe and the Newly Independent States, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers

Kerekes, Zsuzsa. 2001. Freedom of Information in the Commissioner's Practice in László Majtényi, ed., The Door onto the Other Side: A Report on Information Rights, Budapest: Adatvédelmi Biztos Irodája, pp. 287–303

Kerwin, Cornelius. 2003. Rulemaking: How Government Agencies Write Law and Make Policy, 3rd ed., Washington, DC: CQ Press

Kerwin, Cornelius M., and Scott, R. Furlong. 1992. Time and Rulemaking: An Empirical Test of Theory, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 2: 113–138Google Scholar

Kisilowski, Maciej. 2004. The Fig Leaf: How the Concept of Representativeness Deprives Polish Decision-Making of Accountability, Draft, New Haven, CT: Yale Law School, July

Klich, Agnieszka. 1996. Human Rights in Poland: The Role of the Constitutional Tribunal and the Commissioner for Citizens' Rights, St. Louis-Warsaw Transatlantic Journal 1996: 33–63Google Scholar

Knill, Christoph, and Andrea Lenschow. 2000. Do New Brooms Really Sweep Cleaner? Implementation of New Instruments in EU Environmental Policy, in Christoph Knill and Andrea Lenschow, eds., Implementing EU Environmental Policy, New Directions and Old Problems, Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 251–286

Kohler-Koch, Beate. 2001. The Commission White Paper and the Improvement of European Governance, in Christian Joerges, Yves Mény and J. H. H. Weiler, eds., Mountain or Molehill? A Critical Appraisal of the Commission's White Paper on Governance, Florence, Italy: Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, European University Institute. http://www.iue.it/RSCAS/Research/OnlineSymposia/Governance.shtml

Korkut, Umut. 2002. European Union Accession Process in Hungary, Poland, and Romania: Is There a Place for Social Dialogue?Perspectives on European Politics and Society 3: 297–324Google Scholar

Kornai, János. 1992. The Socialist System: The Political Economy of Communism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

Körösényi, András. 1999. Government and Politics in Hungary. Translated by Alan Rewick. Budapest: Central European University Press

Kosztolányi, Gusztáv. 2001. An Ombudsman to Protest Us, Central Europe Review, Vol. 3, Nos. 21–24 (June 11, 18, 25, and Summer Special, 2001). http://www.ce-review.org/01Google Scholar

Kovács, Árpád, and János Lévai. 2001. Corruption and the Struggle Against It – Opportunities for Financial Control, Budapest: State Audit Office, July

Krastev, Ivan, and Georgy Ganev. 2004. The Missing Incentive: Corruption, Anticorruption, and Reelection, in János Kornai and Susan Rose-Ackerman, eds., Building a Trustworthy State in Post-Socialist Transition, New York: Palgrave, pp. 151–172

Kulesza, Michał. 1993. Options for Administrative Reform in Poland, in Joachim Jens Hesse, ed., Administrative Transformation in Central and Eastern Europe: Toward Public Sector Reform in Post-Communist Societies, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 33–40

Kunicova, Jana, and Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 2005. Electoral Rules and Constitutional Structures as Constraints on Corruption, British Journal of Political Science, vol. 35, in pressCrossRef Google Scholar

Kurczewski, Jacek, and Kurczewska, Joanna. 2001. A Self-Governing Society Twenty Years After: Democracy and the Third Sector in Poland, Social Research 68: 937–976Google Scholar

Kuroń, Jacek. 1991. Gwiezdny Czas ‘Winy i Wiary’ Ciag Dalszy [Celestial Time: “Guilt and Faith” Continued], London: Aneks

Kuti, Éva. 1993. Defining the Nonprofit Sector: Hungary, Working Paper 13, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project

Kuti, Éva, Miklós Králik, and Miklós Barabás. 2000. NGO Stock-Taking in Hungary, NGO Studies No. 1, Budapest: World Bank Regional Office Hungary

Langbein, Laura I., and Cornelius, M. Kerwin. 2000. Regulatory Negotiation Versus Conventional Rulemaking: Claims, Counterclaims, and Empirical Evidence, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10: 599–632CrossRef Google Scholar

Leś, Ewa, Sławomir Nałęcz, and Jakub Wygnański. 2000. Defining the Nonprofit Sector: Poland, Working Paper No. 36, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project

Łętowska, Ewa. 1996. The Commissioner for Citizens' Rights in Central and Eastern Europe: The Polish Experience, St. Louis-Warsaw Transatlantic Law Journal 1996: 1–14Google Scholar

Łętowski, Janusz. 1993. Polish Public Administration between Crisis and Renewal, in Joachim Jens Hesse, ed., Administrative Transformation in Central and Eastern Europe: Toward Public Sector Reform in Post-Communist Societies, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 1–11

Lewin, Leif. 1994. The Rise and Decline of Corporatism: The Case of Sweden, European Journal of Political Research 26: 59–79CrossRef Google Scholar

Lindseth, Peter L. 2001. “Weak” Constitutionalism? Reflections on Comitology and Transnational Governance in the European Union, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 21: 145–163CrossRef Google Scholar

Lindseth, Peter L. 2002. Good Governance in Europe's Integrated Market, in Christian Joerges and Renaud Dehousse, eds., Good Governance in Europe's Integrated Markets, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 139–163

Lindseth, Peter L. 2003. Agents Without Principals?: Delegation in an Age of Diffuse and Fragmented Governance, prepared for Second Workshop on Self-Regulation, European University Institute, Nov. 14–15

Lorentzen, Anne. 1998. Transition, Institutions and Regional Development in Hungary, BAZ County, in Henrik Halkier, Mike Danson, and Charlotte Damborg, eds., Regional Development Agencies in Europe, London: Jessica Kingsley, pp. 141–162

Ludwikowski, Rett R. 1998. “Mixed” Constitutions – Product of an East-Central European Constitutional Melting Pot, Boston University International Melting Pot 16: 1–70Google Scholar

Magat, Wesley A., Alan J. Krupnick, and Winston Harrington. 1986. Rules in the Making: A Statistical Analysis of Regulatory Agency Behavior, Washington, DC: Resources for the Future Press

Majone, Giandomenico. 2001. Delegation of Regulatory Powers in a Mixed Polity, final draft, Florence, Italy: European University Institute

Majtényi, László, ed. 2001a. The Door onto the Other Side: A Report on Information Rights, Budapest: Adatvédelmi Biztos Irodája

Majtényi, László. 2001b. The Cause of Data Protection in East Central Europe, in László Majtényi, ed., The Door onto the Other Side: A Report on Information Rights, Budapest: Adatvédelmi Biztos Irodája, pp. 319–340

Marek, Dan, and Baun, Michael. 2002. The EU as a Regional Actor: The Case of the Czech Republic, Journal of Common Market Studies 40: 895–919CrossRef Google Scholar

Marschall, Miklós. 1990. The Nonprofit Sector in a Centrally Planned Economy, in Helmut K. Anheir and Wolfgang Seibel, eds., The Third Sector: Comparative Studies of Nonprofit Organizations, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 277–291

Mashaw, Jerry, and David Harfst. 1990. The Struggle for Auto Safety, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Matey, Maria. 1997. Industrial Relations in Poland During the Transformation Period, in John Brady, ed., Central and Eastern Europe – Industrial Relations and the Market Economy, Dublin: Oak Tree Press, pp. 139–150

Mazmanian, Daniel A., and Jeanne Nienaber. 1979. Can Organizations Change? Environmental Protection, Citizen Participation, and the Corps of Engineers, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution

McCubbins, Mathew, and Schwartz, Thomas. 1984. Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms, American Journal of Political Science 28: 165–179CrossRef Google Scholar

McMenamin, Iain. 2002. Polish Business Associations: Flattened Civil Society or Super Lobbies?Business and Politics 4: 301–317CrossRef Google Scholar

McMillan, John, and Zoido, Pablo. 2004. How to Subvert Democracy: Montesinos in Peru, Journal of Economic Perspectives 18: 69–92CrossRef Google Scholar

Mendelson, Nina A. 2003. Agency Burrowing: Entrenching Policies and Personnel Before a New President Arrives, New York University Law Review 78: 557–666Google Scholar

Millard, Frances. 1998. Environmental Policy in Poland, Environmental Politics 7: 145–161CrossRef Google Scholar

Miller, William L., Åse, B. Gr⊘deland, and Tatyana, Y. Koshechkina. 2001. A Culture of Corruption: Coping with Government in Post-Communist Europe, Budapest: Central European University

Mishler, William, and Rose, Richard. 1997. Trust, Distrust and Skepticism: Popular Evaluation of Civil and Political Institutions in Post-Communist Societies, Journal of Politics 59: 418–451CrossRef Google Scholar

Mishler, William, and Richard Rose. 1998. Trust in Untrustworthy Institutions: Culture and Institutional Performance in Post-Communist Societies, Studies in Public Policy No. 310, Glasgow, Scotland: Centre for the Study of Public Policy, University of Strathclyde

Moravcsik, A. 1998. A Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press

Mosher, James S., and Trubek, David. 2003. Alternative Approaches to Governance in the EU: EU Social Policy and the European Employment Strategy, Journal of Common Market Studies 41: 63–88CrossRef Google Scholar

Mueller, John. 1996. Democracy, Capitalism and the End of Transition, in M. Mandelbaum, ed., Post-Communism: Four Views, New York: Council on Foreign Relations, pp. 102–167

Mueller, John. 2004. Attitudes Toward Democracy and Capitalism: A Western Benchmark, in János Kornai and Susan Rose-Ackerman, eds., Building a Trustworthy State in Post-Socialist Transition, New York: Palgrave, pp. 198–213

Munck, Gerardo L., and Verkuilen, Jay. 2002. Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy, and following commentariesComparative Political Studies 35: 5–57Google Scholar

Nakamura, Robert T., and Thomas W. Church. 2003. Taming Regulation: Superfund and the Challenge of Regulatory Reform, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution

Nelicki, Aleksander. 2001. Kształtowanie się struktur administracji powiatowej i wojewódzkiej [Shaping the Structures of the Powiat and Voivoidship Administration], in Grzegorz Gorzelak, Bohdan Jałowiecki, Mirosław Stec eds., Reforma Administracji Terytorialnej Kraju [Reform of the National Territorial Administration], Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe “Scholar,” pp. 51–72

Nemes, Gusztáv. 2003. Rural Development and Pre-accession Preparation in Hungary: Is There an Alternative Way? OSI International Policy Fellowship Final Policy Paper, Budapest: OSI. http://www.policy.hu/nemes/OSIfinal.pdf

Nunberg, Barbara. 1999. Hungary's Head Start on Reform: The Advanced Transition Experience, in Barbara Nunberg with Luca Barbone and Hans-Ulrich Derlien, eds., The State After Communism: Administrative Transitions in Central and Eastern Europe, Washington, DC: The World Bank, pp. 97– 154

Nunberg, Barbara, and Luca Barbone. 1999. Breaking Administrative Deadlock in Poland: Internal Obstacles and External Incentives, in Barbara Nunberg with Luca Barbone and Hans-Ulrich Derlien, eds., The State After Communism: Administrative Transitions in Central and Eastern Europe, Washington, DC: The World Bank, pp. 7–52

O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1994. Delegative Democracy, Journal of Democracy 5: 55–69CrossRef Google Scholar

O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1996. Illusions about Consolidation, Journal of Democracy 7: 34–51CrossRef Google Scholar

O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1999. Horizontal Accountability in New Democracies, in Andreas Schedler, Larry Diamond, and Marc F. Plattner, eds., The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner

Okraszewska, Aldona, and Jacek Kwiatkowski. 2002. Country Report – Poland: The State of Democracy in Poland's Gmina, in Gábor Soós, Gábor Tóka, and Glen Wright, eds., The State of Democracy in Central Europe, Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative, Open Society Institute, pp. 181–284

Olsen, Johan P. 1983. Organized Democracy: Political Institutions in a Welfare State – The Case of Norway, Bergen, Norway: Universitetsforlaget

O'Neil, Patrick H. 1997. Hungary: Political Transition and Executive Conflict: The Balance or Fragmentation of Power? in Ray Tares, ed., Postcommunist Presidents, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 195–224

Ost, David. 2000. Illusory Corporatism in Eastern Europe: Neoliberal Tripartism and Postcommunist Class Identities, Politics and Society 28: 503–530CrossRef Google Scholar

O'Toole, Laurence J. Jr., and Hanf, Kenneth. 1998. Hungary: Political Transformation and Environmental Challenge, Environmental Politics 7: 93–112CrossRef Google Scholar

Pevehouse, Jon C. 2002. With a Little Help from My Friends? Regional Organizations and the Consolidation of Democracy, American Journal of Political Science 46: 611–626CrossRef Google Scholar

Pickvance, Katy. 1998. Democracy and Environmental Movements in Eastern Europe: A Comparative Study of Hungary and Russia, Boulder, CO: Westview Press

Pickvance, Katy, with Luca Gábor. 2001. Green Future – in Hungary, in Helena Flam, ed., Pink, Purple, Green: Women's, Religious, Environmental and Gay/ Lesbian Movements in Central Europe Today, Boulder, CO: East European Monographs, pp. 104–111

Poland. 1997. Constitution of the Republic of Poland. http://www.kprm.gov.pl/english/97.htm

Poland, Commissioner for Civil Rights Protection. 1998. National Ombudsmen: Collection of Legislation from 27 Countries, Warsaw, Poland, Constitutional Tribunal. 1999. A Selection of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal's Jurisprudence from 1986 to 1999, Warsaw

Poland, Główny Urząd Statystyczny [Central Statistical Office]. 2003. Rocznik Statystyczny Rzeczpospolitej Polskiej [Statistical Yearbook of the Republic of Poland], Warsaw

Poland, Ministerstwo Spraw Wewnętrznych i Administracji, Departament Wdrażania i Monitorowania Reformy Administracji Publicznej [Ministry of Internal Affairs and Administration, Department of Implementation and Monitoring of the Reform of Public Administration]. 1999. Polska Administracja Publiczna po Reformie: Ustrój – Kompetencje – Liczby [The Polish Administration after the Reform: Regime – Competences – Numbers], Warsaw

Poland, Naczelny Sąd Administracyny [Supreme Administrative Court]. 2000. XX Lat Naczelnego Sądu Administracyjnego [20 years of the Supreme Administrative Court], Warsaw

Poland, Naczelny Sąd Administracyny [Supreme Administrative Court]. 2002. Informacja o Dzialalności Naczelnego Sądu Administracynego w Roku 2001 [Information on Activities of the Supreme Administrative Court in 2001]. Warsaw

Poland, Najwyższa Izba Kontroli [Supreme Chamber of Control]. 2001a. Zagrożenie korupcją w świetle badań kontrolnych Najwyższej Izby Kontroli przeprowadzonych w roku 2000 [The Danger of Corruption in Light of Control Activities by the Supreme Chamber of Control in the Year 2000], Warsaw

Poland, Supreme Chamber of Control. 2001b. NIK: Supreme Chamber of Control Poland, Warsaw

Poland. Supreme Chamber of Control. 2002. Annual Report 2001, Warsaw

Pridham, Geoffrey. 2002. EU Enlargement and Consolidating Democracy in Post-Communist States – Formality and Reality, Journal of Common Market Studies 40: 953–973CrossRef Google Scholar

Przeworski, Adam, Michael E. Alvarez, José Antonio Cheibub, and Fernando Limongi. 2000. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

Putnam, Robert. 1988. Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games, International Organization 42: 427–460CrossRef Google Scholar

Regulski, Jerzy, ed. 2002. Samorząd i Demokracja Lokalna – Osiągnięcia, Zagrożenia, Dylematy [Self-government and Local Democracy – Achievements, Threats, and Dilemmas], Warsaw: Foundation in Support of Local Democracy. www.frdl.org.pl

Rodden, Jonathan, and Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1997. The Allocation of Government Authority: Does Federalism Preserve Markets?Virginia Law Review 83: 1521–1572CrossRef Google Scholar

Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1992. Rethinking the Progressive Agenda: The Reform of the American Regulatory State, New York: Free Press

Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1994. Consensus Versus Incentives: A Skeptical Look at Regulatory Negotiation, Duke Law Journal 43: 1206–1220CrossRef Google Scholar

Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1995. Controlling Environmental Policy: The Limits of Public Law in Germany and the United States, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press

Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1999. Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences and Reform, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 2001a. Trust and Honesty in Post-Socialist Societies, Kyklos 54: 415–443CrossRef Google Scholar

Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 2001b. Trust, Honesty and Corruption: Reflections on the State-Building Process, Archives of European Sociology 42: 526–570CrossRef Google Scholar

Rose-Ackerman, Susan, and Achim A. Halpaap. 2002. The Aarhus Convention and the Politics of Process: The Political Economy of Procedural Environmental Rights in Timothy Swanson and Richard Zerbe, eds., Research in Law and Economics – 2001, 20: 27–64

Rossi, Jim. 1997. Participation Run Amok, Northwestern University Law Review 92: 173–249Google Scholar

Rothstein, Bo. 1998. Just Institutions Matter, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

Rothstein, Bo. 2004. Social Trust and Honesty in Government: A Causal Mechanisms Approach, in János Kornai, Bo Rothstein, and Susan Rose-Ackerman, eds., Creating Social Trust in Post-Socialist Transition. New York: Palgrave, pp. 13–30

Sajó, András. 1996. How the Rule of Law Killed Hungarian Welfare Reform, East European Constitutional Review 5/1: 31–56Google Scholar

Salamon, Lester M., Helmut, K. Anheier, Regina List, Stefan Toepler, S. Wojciech Sokolowski, and Associates. 1999. Global Civil Society: Dimensions of the Nonprofit Sector, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Center of Civil Society Studies

Salamon, Lester M. S. Wojciech Sokolowski, and Associates. 2004. Global Civil Society: Dimensions of the Nonprofit Sector, Volume Two, Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press, Inc

Salzberger, Eli M., and Voight, Stefan. 2002. On the Delegation of Powers: With Special Emphasis on Central and Eastern Europe, Constitutional Political Economy 13: 25–52CrossRef Google Scholar

Sandholtz, Walter, and Alec Stone Sweet, eds. 1998. European Integration and Supranational Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press

Scheppele, Kim Lane. 1999. The New Hungarian Constitutional Court, East European Constitutional Review 8(4): 81–87Google Scholar

Scheppele, Kim Lane. 2001. Democracy by Judiciary (Or Why Courts Can Sometimes Be More Democratic than Parliaments), paper prepared for a conference on Constitutional Courts, Washington University, St. Louis

Scheppele, Kim Lane. 2003. Constitutional Negotiations: Political Contexts of Judicial Activism in Post-Soviet Europe?International Sociology 18: 219–238CrossRef Google Scholar

Schimmelfennig, Frank, Engert, Stefan, and Knobel, Heiko. 2003. Costs, Commitment and Compliance: The Impact of EU Democratic Conditions on Latvia, Slovakia, and Turkey, Journal of Common Market Studies 41: 495–518CrossRef Google Scholar

Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and John T. Tierney. 1986. Organized Interests and American Democracy, New York: Harper & Row

Schuck, Peter. 1977. Public Interest Groups and the Policy Process, Public Administration Review 37: 132–140CrossRef Google Scholar

Schumpeter, Joseph. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, New York: Harper & Brothers

Schwartz, Herman. 1999. Surprising Success: The New Eastern European Constitutional Courts, in Andreas Schedler, Larry Diamond, and Marc R. Plattner, eds., The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in new Democracies, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, pp. 195–214

Schwartz, Shalom H., Anat Bardi, and Gabriel Bianchi. 2000. Value Adaptation to the Imposition and Collapse of Communist Regimes in East-Central Europe, in Stanley A. Renshon, and John Duckitt, eds., Political Psychology: Cultural and Crosscultural Foundations, New York: New York University Press, pp. 217–237

Skura, Zenon, and Włodzimierz Ulicki, eds. 2002. Leksykon ludzi ZSP [Lexicon of ZSP people], Vol. I, Warsaw: Ogólnopolska Komisja Historyczna Ruchu Studenckiego i Stowarzyszenie Ruchu Studenckego “Ordynacka.”

Smulovitz, Catalina, and Peruzzotti, Enrique. 2000. Societal Accountability in Latin America, Journal of Democracy 11: 147–158CrossRef Google Scholar

Sólyom, László. 2000. Introduction to the Decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Hungary, in László Sólyom and Georg Brunner, eds., Constitutional Judiciary in a New Democracy: The Hungarian Constitutional Court, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 1–64

Sólyom, László. 2001. The Role of the Ombudsman: Interpreting Fundamental Rights and Controlling Laws, in László Majtényi, ed., The Door onto the Other Side: A Report on Information Rights, Budapest: Adatvédelmi Biztos Irodája, pp. 239–262

Sólyom, László, and Georg Brunner, eds. 2000. Constitutional Judiciary in a New Democracy: The Hungarian Constitutional Court, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press

Soós, Gábor, and Judit Kálmán. 2002. Country Report – Hungary: Report on Local Democracies in Hungary, in Gábor Soós, Gábor Tóka, and Glen Wright, eds., The State of Democracy in Central Europe, Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative, Open Society Institute, pp. 15– 107

Stark, David, and László Bruszt. 1998. Postsocialist Pathways: Transforming Politics and Property in East Central Europe, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

Stone Sweet, Alec. 2003. Integration and the Europeanization of the Law, in P. Craig and R. Rawlings, eds., Law and Administration in Europe. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 197–224

Strauss, Peter. 1974. Rules, Adjudications, and Other Sources of Law in an Executive Department: Reflections on the Interior Department's Administration of the Mining Law, Columbia Law Review 74: 1231–1275CrossRef Google Scholar

Supreme Audit Institutions of the Central and Eastern European Countries, Cyprus, Malta and the European Court of Auditors [cited as Supreme Audit Institutions] 2001. Relations Between Supreme Audit Institutions and Parliamentary Committees, Limassol, Nov

Świątkiewicz, Jerzy. 2001. Rzecznik Praw Obywatelskich w polskim systemie prawnyn. Stan na 30 czerwca 2001 [The Commissioner for Citizens' Rights in the Polish Legal System, State of Affairs on June 30, 2001], Warsaw: Law and Economics Practice Publishing House

Szabó, Gábor. 1993. Administrative Transition in a Post-Communist Society: The Case of Hungary, in Joachim Jens Hesse, ed., Administrative Transformation in Central and Eastern Europe: Toward Public Sector Reform in Post-Communist Societies, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 89–103

Szalai, Júlia. 1995–1996. Self-Governance and Representation of Conflicting Interests, in Mihály Laki, Júlia Szalai, and Ágnes Vajda, eds., Participation and Changes in Property Relations in Post-Communist Societies: The Hungarian Case, Budapest: Active Society Foundation, pp. 42–76

Szikinger, István. 1999. The Procuracy and Its Problems: Hungary, East European Constitutional Review 8(1/2): 85–95Google Scholar

Sztompka, Piotr. 1999. Trust: A Sociological Theory, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

Taras, Ray, ed. 1997. Postcommunist Presidents, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

Taras, Wojciech. 1993. Changes in Polish Public Administration 1989–1992, in Joachim Jens Hesse, ed., Administrative Transformation in Central and Eastern Europe, Oxford: Blackwell

Tőkés, Rudolf. 1996. Hungary's Negotiated Revolution: Economic Reform, Social Change, and Political Succession, 1957–1990. New York: Cambridge University Press

Uslaner, Eric, and Gabriel Badescu. 2004. Honesty, Trust, and Legal Norms in the Transition to Democracy: Why Bo Rothstein Is Better Able to Explain Sweden Than Romania, János Kornai, Bo Rothstein, and Susan Rose-Ackerman, eds., Creating Social Trust in Post-Socialist Transition. New York: Palgrave, pp. 31–52

Vachudova, Milada Anna. 2000. EU Enlargement: An Overview, East European Constitutional Review, 9(4): 64–69Google Scholar

Vachudova, Milada Anna. 2001a. The Czech Republic: The Unexpected Force of Institutional Constraints, in Jan Zielonka and Alex Pravda, eds., Democratic Consolidation in Eastern Europe, Volume 2: International and Transnational Factors, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 325–362

Vachudova, Milada Anna. 2001b. The Leverage of International Institutions on Democratizing States: Eastern Europe and the European Union, EUI Working Paper RSC No. 2001/33, Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute

Vajda, Ágnes. 1995–1996. Foundations and Associations: Citizen Initiatives, the Denationalization of the Non-Profit-Oriented Sector: General Trends in Hungary, Local Organisation in a Provincial Town, in Mihály Laki, Júlia Szalai, and Ágnes Vajda, eds., Participation and Changes in Property Relations in Post-Communist Societies: The Hungarian Case, Budapest: Active Society Foundation, pp. 77–112

Várfalvi, István. 2001. Az önkormányzati pénzügyi-finanszírozási rendszer átalakítási lehetőségei [The Possibilities of Transforming Local Government Financing] Budapest: Ministry of the Interior. http://web.b-m.hu/web/euik.nsf/6AFEF54BFB243413C1256DCA0049C27D/$FILE/Az%20önkormányzati%20pénzügyi%20-%20Várfalvi%20István.doc

Verebélyi, Imre. 1993. Options for Administrative Reform in Hungary, in Joachim Jens Hesse, ed., Administrative Transformation in Central and Eastern Europe: Toward Public Sector Reform in Post-Communist Societies, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 105–120

Vogel, David. 1980–1981. The Public-Interest Movement and the American Reform Tradition, Political Science Quarterly 95: 607–627CrossRef Google Scholar

Waller, Michael. 1998. Geopolitics and the Environment in Eastern Europe, Environmental Politics 7: 29–52CrossRef Google Scholar

Weiler, Joseph. 1995. Does Europe Need a Constitution? Reflections on Demos, Telos, and the German Masstricht Decision, European Law Journal 1: 1219–1258Google Scholar

West, William F. 2004. Formal Procedures, Informal Processes, Accountability, and Responsiveness in Bureaucratic Policy Making: An Institutional Analysis, Public Administration Review 64: 66–80CrossRef Google Scholar

Wielka Encyklopedia Powszechna PWN [The PWN Great Encyclopedia]. 1969. Vol. 12, Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe

Wierzbowski, Marek, ed. 2003. Prawo Administracyjne, 5th ed., Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Prawnicze LexisNexis

Zieliński, Tadeusz. 1994. Contribution, in European Union, Proceedings of the 4th Round Table with European Ombudsmen, EU document H/Omb 94 (21), pp. 40–44, 121–126

Zoll, Andrzej. 2002. Information of the Commissioner for Civil Rights Protection, Prof. Andrzej Zoll, for 2001, Warsaw: Commissioner for Civil Rights Protection

Żylicz, Tomasz, and Katharina Holzinger. 2000. Environmental Policy in Poland and the Consequences of Approximation to the European Union, in Katharina Holzinger and Peter Knoepfel, eds., Environmental Policy in a European Union of Variable Geometry? The Challenge of the Next Enlargement, Basel: Helbing & Lichtenhahn, pp. 215–248