Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T14:47:20.311Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

19 - Indigenous peoples and parks in Malaysia: issues and questions

from Part II - Conservation with and against people(s)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 November 2009

Hood Salleh
Affiliation:
Institute of Environment and Development (LESTARI) Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Kuala Lumpur Malaysia
Keith A. Bettinger
Affiliation:
Institute of Environment and Development (LESTARI) Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Kuala Lumpur Malaysia
Navjot S. Sodhi
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore
Greg Acciaioli
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore
Maribeth Erb
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore
Alan Khee-Jin Tan
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore
Get access

Summary

Introduction

This chapter seeks to describe the relationship between indigenous peoples and several protected areas in Malaysia, namely Krau Wildlife Reserve, Taman Negara National Park, Endau Rompin National Park, Kinabalu National Park and Gunung Mulu National Park. These protected areas were chosen because they all illustrate various aspects of the relationship between protected areas and indigenous people. Krau Wildlife Refuge in Pahang is used by groups of Chewong and Jah Hut. These two groups live outside the park, but maintain a certain level of traditional ownership rights to the reserve. Taman Negara, covering parts of Pahang, Kelantan and Terenganu, is the home of a group of the Batek Negrito people. This case study describes the relationship of grudging tolerance on the part of the park administration towards a small and truly nomadic group of indigenous people. Endau Rompin National Park in Johor shows how indigenous people are currently employed in parks and conservation in Malaysia. The description of Gunung Mulu provides a portrait of the Eastern Penan, another hunter-gather group numbering about 400, who live in and have customary access rights to the park. This instance also reveals how the Sarawak Forestry Department (SFD) has handled an indigenous population residing within a protected area. Lastly, Kinabalu Park illustrates the treatment of indigenous people in the state of Sabah, in which indigenous groups have far more influence than any of the other states of Malaysia.

Type
Chapter
Information
Biodiversity and Human Livelihoods in Protected Areas
Case Studies from the Malay Archipelago
, pp. 289 - 310
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, J. S. & McShane, T. O. (1992). The Myth of Wild Africa: Conservation Without Illusion. Los Angeles, CA and London, UK: The University of California Press.Google Scholar
Anon (1954) Act 1354: Aboriginal Peoples Act, 1954, Revised 1974.
Asia Indigenous Peoples Pact Foundation (AIPP) (2005). Southeast Asia Indigenous Peoples and Collaborative Management in Protected Areas. Chiang Mai, Thailand: AIPP Foundation.Google Scholar
Brookfield, H., Potter, L. & Byron, Y. (1995). In Place of the Forest: Environmental and Socio-Economic Transformation in Borneo and the Eastern Malay Peninsula. Tokyo, Japan: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
Buergin, R. (2001). Contested Heritages: Disputes on People, Forests, and a World Heritage Site in Globalizing Thailand, Socio-Economics of Forest Use in the Tropics and Subtropics. Working Paper #9. Freiburg, Germany: Albert Ludwig Universität.Google Scholar
Cleary, M. & Eaton, P. (1996). Tradition and Reform: Land Tenure and Rural Development in South-East Asia. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Colchester, M. (1993). Pirates, squatters, and poachers: the political economy of dispossession of the native peoples of Sarawak. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters, 3, 158–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colchester, M. (1997). Salvaging nature: indigenous people s and protected areas. In Ghimire, K. B. & Pimbert,, M. P. eds., Social Change and Conservation. London, UK: Earthscan, pp. 97–130.Google Scholar
Colchester, M. (2002). Conservation policy and the indigenous peoples of the Commonwealth. Paper presented to the ‘Conference on Indigenous Peoples of the Commonwealth and the Millennium Development Goals’, 20–21 March 2002, London, UK.
Dixon, J. A. & Sherman, P. B. (1991). Economics of protected areas. Ambro, 20, 68–74.Google Scholar
Commissioner of Law Revision, Malaysia (2006). Act 134: Aboriginal Peoples Act 1954, Laws of Malaysia (Reprint). Kuala Lumpur: Percetakan Nasional Malaysia BHD.
Hasan, M. N., Salleh, H. & Komoo, I. (1997). Parks: notes on a more dynamic approach. In Hasan, M. N. ed. Lestari Proceedings: Sabah Parks: Preserving Our National Heritage. Bangi, Malaysia: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.Google Scholar
Jacobson, S. K. (1987). The educational role of a developing country's national park system: an evaluation of Kinabalu Park, Malaysia. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Duke University.
Khaider, A. (1994). Save the Penans.Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Berita Publishing.Google Scholar
Kingsbury, B. (1998). Indigenous peoples in International Law: a constructivist approach. The American Journal of International Law, 92, 414–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langub, J. (1996). Penan response to change and development. In Padoch, C. & Peluso, N. L., eds., Borneo in Transition: People, Forests, Conservation, and Development. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Oxford University Press, pp. 103–120.Google Scholar
Lim,, H. S. (1997). Land rights of the Orang Asli. In Tanah Air Ku: Land Issues in Malaysia. Penang, Malaysia: Consumers' Association of Penang.Google Scholar
Lye, T.-P. (2002). Forest people, conservation boundaries, and the problem of ‘modernity’ in Malaysia. In Benjamin, G. & Chou, C., eds., Tribal Communities in the Malay World: Historical, Cultural, and Social Perspectives. Leiden, Netherlands: International Institute for Asian Studies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeely, J. A. & Miller, K. R. (1983). IUCN, national parks, and protected areas: priorities for action. Environmental Conservation, 10, 13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molnar, A., Scherr, S. & Khare, A. (2004). Who Conserves the World's Forests? Community-Driven Strategies to Protect Forests and Respect Rights. Washington, D C: Forest Trends.Google Scholar
Nabhan, G. P. & Tuxill,, J. (2001). People, Plants and Protected Areas: A Guide to In Situ Management. London, UK: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Nicholas, C. (2000). The Orang Asli and the Contest for Resources: Indigenous Politics, Development and Identity in Peninsular Malaysia. Copenhagen, Denmark: International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs.Google Scholar
Nicholas, C. (2002). Organizing Orang Asli identity. In Benjamin, G. & Chou, C. eds., Tribal Communities in the Malay World: Historical, Cultural, and Social Perspectives. Leiden, Netherlands: International Institute for Asian Studies, pp. 119–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redford,, K. H. & Padoch, C. (1992). Conservation of Neotropical Forests. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Shah, A. (1995). The Economics of Third World National Parks: Issues of Tourism and Environmental Management. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Tuboh, L., Sipail, E. & Gosungkit, Z. (1998). A case study of the Kadazandusun Communities of the Crocker Range National Park, Sabah, Malaysia. In Colchester, M. & Erni, C., eds., Indigenous Peoples and Protected Areas in South and Southeast Asia : From Principles to Practice. Copenhagen, Denmark: International Workgroup for Indigenous Peoples Affairs.Google Scholar
UNESCO (2001). Indigenous People and Parks: The Surin Islands Project. Coastal Region and Small Island Paper 8. Paris, France: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Watson, A., Alessa, L. & Glaspell, B. (2002). The relationship between traditional ecological knowledge, evolving cultures, and wilderness protection in the circumpolar north. Conservation Ecology, 1: http://www.consecol.org/vol8/iss1/art2/.
World Wide Fund for Nature (1998). The National Parks and Other Wild Places of Malaysia. London, UK: New Holland Press.Google Scholar
Xanthaki, A. (2003). Land rights of indigenous people s in Southeast Asia. Melbourne Journal of International Law, 4, 467–496.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×