Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T13:34:28.399Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Alternative reproductive tactics in fish

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2009

Michael Taborsky
Affiliation:
Division of Behavioural Ecology Zoological Institute University of Bern Wohlenstrasse 50A CH-3032 Hinterkappelen Switzerland
Rui F. Oliveira
Affiliation:
Instituto Superior Psicologia Aplicada, Lisbon
Michael Taborsky
Affiliation:
Universität Bern, Switzerland
H. Jane Brockmann
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Get access

Summary

CHAPTER SUMMARY

Among vertebrates, fish show by far the greatest variability of alternative reproductive tactics (ARTs). Usually, males attempting to monopolize access to females or fertilizations are parasitized by conspecific male competitors (Taborsky 1997). This is so common in fish (Mank and Avise 2006) that it appears to be the rule rather than the exception: in fish with external fertilization, 170 species belonging to 32 families have been described to show ARTs (Table 10.1). Apart from being common, ARTs in fish are also exceptionally variable. Parasitic males exploiting the effort of conspecific competitors may do so by surreptitious participation in spawning; they may mimic females in appearance and behavior to reach their goal; intercept approaching mates or steal eggs from neighbors to attract mates to their nest; force copulations in viviparous species; gain access to mates by cooperating with their competitors; or oust a territory owner aggressively to spawn in his nest before letting him care for their brood. Sometimes, three or more alternative tactics may exist within a species (Taborsky 1994, 2001, Avise et al. 2002). Our understanding of sexual selection mechanisms and the concepts underlying conventional classifications of mating patterns largely ignore the existence and importance of ARTs (Emlen and Oring 1977, Wittenberger 1979, Davies 1991, Andersson 1994, 2005). One could argue that the way reproductive behaviour in animals is viewed and categorized today would be different if it had been developed on the basis of fish reproduction instead of bird mating systems.

Type
Chapter
Information
Alternative Reproductive Tactics
An Integrative Approach
, pp. 251 - 299
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akagawa, I. and Okiyama, M. 1993. Alternative male mating tactics in Hypoptychus dybowskii (Gasterosteiformes): territoriality, body size and nuptial coloration. Japanese Journal of Ichthyology 40, 343–350.Google Scholar
Akagawa, I. and Okiyama, M. 1995. Reproductive behaviour of the filefish Rudarius ercodes: male spawning parades and female choice. Environmental Biology of Fishes 43, 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albrecht, H. 1968. Freiwasserbeobachtungen an Tilapien (Pisces, Cichlidae) in Ostafrika. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 25, 377–394.Google Scholar
Alm, G. 1959. Connection between maturity, size and age in fishes. Report of the Institute of Freshwater Research Drottningholm 40, 5–145.Google Scholar
Alonzo, S. H. and Warner, R. R. 2000a. Allocation to mate guarding or increased sperm production in a Mediterranean wrasse. American Naturalist 156, 266–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alonzo, S. H. and Warner, R. R. 2000b. Female choice, conflict between the sexes and the evolution of male alternative reproductive behaviours. Evolutionary Ecology Research 2, 149–170.Google Scholar
Alonzo, S. H. and Warner, R. R. 2000c. Dynamic games and field experiments examining intra- and intersexual conflict: explaining counterintuitive mating behavior in a Mediterranean wrasse, Symphodus ocellatus. Behavioral Ecology 11, 56–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alonzo, S. H., Taborsky, M., and Wirtz, P. 2000. Male alternative reproductive behaviors in a Mediterranean wrasse, Symphodus ocellatus: evidence from otoliths for multiple life-history pathways. Evolutionary Ecology Research 2, 1–11.Google Scholar
Andersson, M. 1984. Brood parasitism within species. In Barnard, C. J. (ed.) Producers and Scroungers: Strategies of Exploitation and Parasitism, pp. 195–228. Beckenham, UK: Croom Helm.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Andersson, M. 2005. Evolution of classical polyandry: three steps to female emancipation. Ethology 111, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnqvist, G. and Rowe, L. 2005. Sexual Conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aspbury, A. S. and Gabor, C. R. 2004. Differential sperm priming by male sailfin mollies (Poecilia latipinna): effects of female and male size. Ethology 110, 193–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aubin-Horth, N. and Dodson, J. J. 2004. Influence of individual body size and variable thresholds on the incidence of a sneaker male reproductive tactic in Atlantic salmon. Evolution 58, 136–144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aubin-Horth, N., Landry, C. R., Letcher, B. H., and Hofmann, H. A. 2005a. Alternative life histories shape brain gene expression profiles in males of the same population. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 272, 1655–1662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aubin-Horth, N., Letcher, B. H., and Hofmann, H. A. 2005b. Interaction of rearing environment and reproductive tactic on gene expression profiles in Atlantic salmon. Journal of Heredity 96, 261–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aubin-Horth, N., Ryan, D. A. J., Good, S. P., and Dodson, J. J. 2005c. Balancing selection on size: effects on the incidence of an alternative reproductive tactic. Evolutionary Ecology Research 7, 1171–1182.Google Scholar
Austad, S. N. 1984. A classifiaction of alternative reproductive behaviors and methods of field-testing ESS models. American Zoologist 24, 309–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avise, J. C., Jones, A. G., Walker, D., and DeWoody, J. A. 2002. Genetic mating systems and reproductive natural histories of fishes: lessons for ecology and evolution. Annual Review of Genetics 36, 19–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Awata, S., Munehara, H., and Kohda, M. 2005. Social system and reproduction of helpers in a cooperatively breeding cichlid fish (Julidochromis ornatus) in Lake Tanganyika: field observations and parentage analyses. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 58, 506–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Awata, S., Heg, D., Munehara, H., and Kohda, M. 2006. Testis size depends on social status and the presence of male helpers in the cooperatively breeding cichlid Julidochromis ornatus. Behavioral Ecology 17, 372–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, J. K., Saunders, R. L., and Buzeta, M. I. 1980. Influence of parental smolt age and sea age on growth and smolting of hatchery reared Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 37, 1379–1386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, M. A., and Parker, G. A. 1996. Sperm competition games: external fertilization and “adaptive” infertility. Journal of Theoretical Biology 180, 141–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balshine-Earn, S., Neat, F. C., Reid, H., and Taborsky, M. 1998. Paying to stay or paying to breed? Field evidence for direct benefits of helping behavior in a cooperatively breeding fish. Behavioral Ecology 9, 432–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balshine, S., Leach, B. J., Neat, F., Werner, N. Y., and Montgomerie, R. 2001a. Sperm size of African cichlids in relation to sperm competition. Behavioral Ecology 12, 726–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balshine, S., Leach, B., Neat, F., et al. 2001b. Correlates of group size in a cooperatively breeding cichlid fish. Behavioral Ecolology and Sociobiology 50, 134–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barlow, G. W. 1967. Social behavior of a South American leaf fish, Polycentrus schomburgkii, with an account of recurring pseudofemale behavior. American Midland Naturalist 78, 215–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnard, C. J. (ed.) 1984. Producers and Scroungers: Strategies of Exploitation and Parasitism. Beckenham, UK: Croom Helm.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barni, A., Mazzoldi, C., and Rasotto, M. B. 2001. Reproductive apparatus and male accessory structures in two batrachoid species (Teleostei, Batrachoididae). Journal of Fish Biology 58, 1557–1569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bass, A. H. 1992. Dimorphic male brains and alternative reproductive tactics in a vocalizing fish. Trends in Neurosciences 15, 139–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bass, A. H. and Andersen, K. 1991. Intersexual and intrasexual dimorphisms in the vocal control system of a teleost fish: motor axon number and size. Brain, Behavior, and Evolution 37, 204–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bass, A. H., Horvath, B. J., and Brothers, E. B. 1996. Nonsequential developmental trajectories lead to dimorphic vocal circuitry for males with alternative reproductive tactics. Journal of Neurobiology 30, 493–504.3.0.CO;2-Z>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bateman, A. J. 1948. Intrasexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2, 349–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, D., Laughton, R., Armstrong, J. D., and Metcalfe, N. B. 2004. Altitudinal variation in the relationship between growth and maturation rate in salmon parr. Journal of Animal Ecology 73, 253–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baylis, J. R. 1981. The evolution of parental care in fishes, with reference to Darwin's rule of male sexual selection. Environmental Biology of Fishes 6, 223–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beall, E. and Gaudemar, B. 1999. Plasticity of reproductive behaviour in Atlantic salmon Salmo salar (Salmonidae) in relation to environmental factors. Cybium 23, 9–28.Google Scholar
Beckman, B. R. and Larsen, D. A. 2005. Upstream migration of minijack (age-2) Chinook salmon in the Columbia River: behavior, abundance, distribution, and origin. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 134, 1520–1541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bekkevold, D., Hansen, M. M., and Loeschcke, V. 2002. Male reproductive competition in spawning aggregations of cod (Gadus morhua, L.). Molecular Ecology 11, 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bender, N., Heg, D., Hamilton, I. M., et al. 2006. The relationship between social status, behaviour, growth and steroids in male helpers and breeders of a cooperatively breeding cichlid. Hormones and Behavior 50, 173–182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berglund, A. and Rosenqvist, G. 1993. Selective males and ardent femals in pipefishes. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 32, 331–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berglund, A., Rosenqvist, G., and Svensson, I. 1989. Reproductive success of females limited by males in two pipefish species. American Naturalist 133, 506–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berglund, A., Widemo, M. S., and Rosenqvist, G. 2005. Sex-role reversal revisited: choosy females and ornamented, competitive males in a pipefish. Behavioral Ecology 16, 649–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergmüller, R. and Taborsky, M. 2005. Experimental manipulation of helping in a cooperative breeder: helpers “pay to stay” by pre-emptive appeasement. Animal Behaviour 69, 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergmüller, R., Heg, D., Peer, K., and Taborsky, M. 2005a. Extended safe havens and between-group dispersal of helpers in a cooperatively breeding cichlid. Behaviour 142, 1643–1667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergmüller, R., Heg, D., and Taborsky, M. 2005b. Helpers in a cooperatively breeding cichlid stay and pay or disperse and breed, depending on ecological constraints. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 272, 325–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billard, R. 1986. Spermatogenesis and spermatology of some teleost fish species. Reproduction Nutrition Development 26, 877–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bisazza, A. 1993. Male competition, female mate choice and sexual size dimorphism in poeciliid fishes. Marine Behaviour and Physiology 23, 257–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchfield, P. J. and Ridgway, M. S. 1999. The cost of peripheral males in a brook trout mating system. Animal Behaviour 57, 537–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchfield, P. J., Ridgway, M. S., and Wilson, C. C. 2003. Breeding success of male brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) in the wild. Molecular Ecology 12, 2417–2428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blumer, L. S. 1979. Male parental care in bony fishes. Quarterly Review of Biology 54, 149–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumer, L. S. 1982. A bibliography and categorization of bony fishes exhibiting parental care. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 76, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borg, B. 1994. Androgens in teleost fishes. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology C 109, 219–245.Google Scholar
Brantley, R. K.and Bass, A. H. 1994. Alternative male spawning tactics and acoustic signaling in the plainfin midshipman fish, Porichthys notatus. Ethology 96, 213–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brantley, R. K., Tseng, J., and Bass, A. H. 1993a. The ontogeny of intersexual and intrasexual vocal muscle dimorphisms in a sound producing fish. Brain, Behavior, and Evolution 42, 336–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brantley, R. K., Wingfield, J. C., and Bass, A. H. 1993b. Sex steroid levels in Porichthys notatus, a fish with alternative reproductive tactics, and a review of the hormonal bases for male dimorphism among teleost fishes. Hormones and Behavior 27, 332–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brawn, V. M. 1961. Reproductive behaviour of the cod (Gadus callarias L.). Behaviour 18, 177–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breder, C. M. and Rosen, D. E. 1966. Modes of Reproduction in Fishes. Garden City, NY: Natural History Press.Google Scholar
Brockmann, H. J. 2001. The evolution of alternative strategies and tactics. Advances in the Study of Behavior 30, 1–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouwer, L., Heg, D., and Taborsky, M. 2005. Experimental evidence for helper effects in a cooperatively breeding cichlid. Behavioral Ecology 16, 667–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruch, R. M. and Binkowski, F. P. 2002. Spawning behavior of lake sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens). Journal of Applied Ichthyology 18, 570–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bshary, R. 2002. Biting cleaner fish use altruism to deceive image-scoring client reef fish. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 269, 2087–2093.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bshary, R. and Grutter, A. S. 2006. Image scoring and cooperation in a cleaner fish mutualism. Nature 441, 975–978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burness, G., Casselman, S. J., Schulte-Hostedde, A. I., Moyes, C. D., and Montgomerie, R. 2004. Sperm swimming speed and energetics vary with sperm competition risk in bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 56, 65–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burness, G., Moyes, C. D., and Montgomerie, R. 2005. Motility, ATP levels and metabolic enzyme activity of sperm from bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology A 140, 11–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Candolin, U. and Reynolds, J. D. 2002a. Adjustments of ejaculation rates in response to risk of sperm competition in a fish, the bitterling (Rhodeus sericeus). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 269, 1549–1553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Candolin, U. and Reynolds, J. D. 2002b. Why do males tolerate sneakers? Tests with the European bitterling, Rhodeus sericeus. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 51, 146–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cant, M. A. 2006. A tale of two theories: parent–offspring conflict and reproductive skew. Animal Behaviour 71, 255–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cant, M. A. and Johnstone, R. A. 2000. Power struggles, dominance testing, and reproductive skew. American Naturalist 155, 406–417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cargnelli, L. M. and Gross, M. R. 1996. The temporal dimension in fish recruitment: birth date, body size, and size-dependent survival in a sunfish (bluegill: Lepomis macrochirus). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53, 360–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casselman, S. J. and Montgomerie, R. 2004. Sperm traits in relation to male quality in colonial spawning bluegill. Journal of Fish Biology 64, 1700–1711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheek, A. O., Thomas, P., and Sullivan, C. V. 2000. Sex steroids relative to alternative mating behaviors in the simultaneous hermaphrodite Serranus subligarius (Perciformes: Serranidae). Hormones and Behavior 37, 198–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, C. C. and Fernald, R. D. 2006. Distributions of two gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor types in a cichlid fish suggest functional specialization. Journal of Comparative Neurology 495, 314–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, W. C. and Blackburn, J. 1994. Effect of growth on early sexual maturation in stream-type chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Aquaculture 121, 95–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T. H. 1991. The Evolution of Parental Care. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T. H. 1998. Reproductive skew, concessions and limited control. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13, 288–292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colin, P. L. and Bell, L. J. 1991. Aspects of the spawning of labrid and scarid fishes (Pisces: Labroidei) at Enewetak Atoll, Marshall Islands with notes on other families. Environmental Biology of Fishes 32, 229–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colombo, L., Marconato, A., Belvedere, P. C., and Frisco, C. 1980. Endocrinology of teleost reproduction: a testicular steroid pheromone in the black goby, Gobius jozo L. Bolletin Zoologico 47, 355–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connor, R. C. 1996. Partner preferences in by-product mutualisms and the case of predator inspection in fish. Animal Behaviour 51, 451–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constantz, G. D. 1975. Behavioural ecology of mating in the male Gila topminnow, Poeciliopsis occidentalis. Ecology 56, 966–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constantz, G. D. 1984. Sperm competition in poeciliid fishes. In Smith, R. L. (ed.) Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems, pp. 465–485. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Constantz, G. D. 1985. Alloparental care in the tesselated darter, Etheostoma olmstedi (Pisces: Percidae). Environmental Biology of Fishes 14, 175–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darchambeau, F. and Poncin, P. 1997. Field observations of the spawning behaviour of European grayling. Journal of Fish Biology 51, 1066–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darling, J. D. S., Noble, M. L., and Shaw, E. 1980. Reproductive strategies in the surfperches. 1. Multiple insemination in natural populations of the shiner perch, Cymatogaster aggregata. Evolution 34, 271–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, F. A. 1935. The development of the secondary sexual characters in the pink salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Journal of Morphology 57, 169–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, N. B. 1991. Mating systems. In Krebs, J. R. and Davies, N. B. (eds.) Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific.Google Scholar
Davies, N. B., Bourke, F. G., and Brooke, M. D. 1989. Cuckoos and parasitic ants: interspecific brood parasitism as an evolutionary arms race. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 4, 274–278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dawkins, M. S. and Guilford, T. 1991. The corruption of honest signaling. Animal Behaviour 41, 865–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, R. 1980. Good strategy or evolutionarily stable strategy? In Barlow, G. W. and Silverberg, J. (eds.) Sociobiology: Beyond Nature/Nurture?, pp. 331–367. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Gaudemar, B., Bonzom, J. M., and Beall, E. 2000. Effects of courtship and relative mate size on sexual motivation in Atlantic salmon. Journal of Fish Biology 57, 502–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girolamo, M., Scaggiante, M., and Rasotto, M. B. 1999. Social organization and sexual pattern in the Mediterranean parrotfish Sparisoma cretense (Teleostei : Scaridae). Marine Biology 135, 353–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraipont, M., FitzGerald, G. J., and Guderley, H. 1993. Age-related differences in reproductive tactics in the three-spined stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Animal Behaviour 46, 961–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonge, J. and Videler, J. J. 1989. Differences between the reproductive biologies of Tripterygion tripteronotus and Tripterygion delaisi (Pisces, Perciformes, Tripterygiidae): the adaptive significance of an alternative mating strategy and a red instead of a yellow nuptial color. Marine Biology 100, 431–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonge, J., Ruiter, A. J. H., and Hurk, R. 1989. Testis–testicular gland complex of two Tripterygion species (Blennioidei, Teleostei): differences between territorial and non-territorial males. Journal of Fish Biology 35, 497–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demski, L. S. 1987. Diversity in reproductive patterns and behavior in teleost fishes. In Crenos, D. (ed.) Psychobiology of Reproductive Behavior: An Evolutionary Perspective, pp. 1–27. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Devlin, R. H. and Nagahama, Y. 2002. Sex determination and sex differentiation in fish: an overview of genetic, physiological, and environmental influences. Aquaculture 208, 191–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waal, F. B. M. and Berger, M. L. 2000. Payment for labour in monkeys. Nature 404, 563.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeWoody, J. A. and Avise, J. C. 2001. Genetic perspectives on the natural history of fish mating systems. Journal of Heredity 92, 167–172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeWoody, J. A., Fletcher, D. E., Wilkins, S. D., Nelson, W. S., and Avise, J. C. 2000a. Genetic monogamy and biparental care in an externally fertilizing fish, the largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 267, 2431–2437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeWoody, J. A., Fletcher, D. E., Mackiewicz, M., Wilkins, S. D., and Avise, J. C. 2000b. The genetic mating system of spotted sunfish (Lepomis punctatus): mate numbers and the influence of male reproductive parasites. Molecular Ecology 9, 2119–2128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dierkes, P., Taborsky, M., and Kohler, U. 1999. Reproductive parasitism of broodcare helpers in a cooperatively breeding fish. Behavioral Ecology 10, 510–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dierkes, P., Heg, D., Taborsky, M., Skubic, E., and Achmann, R. 2005. Genetic relatedness in groups is sex-specific and declines with age of helpers in a cooperatively breeding cichlid. Ecology Letters 8, 968–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dill, L. M., Hedrick, A. V., and Fraser, A. 1999. Male mating strategies under predation risk: do females call the shots?Behavioral Ecology 10, 452–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dominey, W. J. 1980. Female mimicry in male bluegill sunfish: a genetic polymorphism?Nature 284, 546–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douard, V., Robinson-Rechavi, M., Laudet, V., and Guiguen, Y. 2003. Molecular evolution of angrogen receptors in fish. Fish Physiology and Biochemistry 28, 207–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drilling, C. C. and Grober, M. S. 2005. An initial description of alternative male reproductive phenotypes in the bluebanded goby, Lythrypnus dalli (Teleostei, Gobiidae). Environmental Biology of Fishes 72, 361–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dugatkin, L. A. 1991. Dynamics of the tit-for-tat strategy during predator inspection in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 29, 127–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dugatkin, L. A. 1997. Cooperation among Animals: An Evolutionary Perspective. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dugatkin, L. A. and Mesterton-Gibbons, M. 1996. Cooperation among unrelated individuals: reciprocal altruism, by-product mutualism and group selection in fishes. Biosystems 37, 19–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunning, J. B. 1992. CRC Handbook of Avian Body Masses. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Eggert, B. 1932. Zur Kenntnis der Biologie, der sekundären Geschlechtsmerkmale und des Eies von Blennius pavo. Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Ökologie der Tiere 24, 682–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emlen, S. T. and Oring, L. W. 1977. Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197, 215–223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Engqvist, L. and Reinhold, K. 2005. Pitfalls in experiments testing predictions from sperm competition theory. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18, 116–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erbelding-Denk, C., Schröder, J. H., Schartl, M., et al. 1994. Male polymorphism in Limia perugiae (Pisces: Poeciliidae). Behavioral Genetics 24, 95–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esteve, M. 2005. Observations of spawning behaviour in Salmoninae: Salmo, Oncorhynchus and Salvelinus. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 15, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, J. P. and Magurran, A. E. 2000. Multiple benefits of multiple mating in guppies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97, 10074–10076.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, J. P. and Magurran, A. E. 2001. Patterns of sperm precedence and predictors of paternity in the Trinidadian guppy. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 268, 719–724.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, J. P., Pierotti, M., and Pilastro, A. 2003a. Male mating behavior and ejaculate expenditure under sperm competition risk in the eastern mosquitofish. Behavioral Ecology 14, 268–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, J. P., Zane, L., Francescato, S., and Pilastro, A. 2003b. Directional postcopulatory sexual selection revealed by artificial insemination. Nature 421, 360–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabricius, E. and Gustafson, K. J. 1958. Some new observations on the spawning behaviour of the pike, Esox lucius L. In Report No. 39, pp. 23–54. Drottningholm, Sweden: Fishery Board of Sweden.Google Scholar
Fahy, W. E. 1954. The life history of the northern greenside darter, Etheostoma blennioides blennioides Rafinesque. Journal of the Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society 70, 139–205.Google Scholar
Farr, J. A. 1980a. The effects of sexual experience and female receptivity on courtship–rape decisions in male guppies, Poecilia reticulata (Pisces: Poeciliidae). Animal Behaviour 28, 1195–1201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farr, J. A. 1980b. Social behavior patterns as determinants of reproductive success in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata Peters (Pisces, Poeciliidae): an experimental study of the effects of intermale competition, female choice, and sexual selection. Behaviour 74, 38–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farr, J. A., Travis, J., and Trexler, J. C. 1986. Behavioral allometry and interdemic variation in sexual behavior of the sailfin molly, Poecilia latipinna (Pisces, Poeciliidae). Animal Behaviour 34, 497–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernald, R. D. 2003. How does behavior change the brain? Multiple methods to answer old questions. Integrative and Comparative Biology 43, 771–779.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiedler, K. 1954. Vergleichende Verhaltensstudien an Seenadeln, Schlangennadeln und Seepferdchen. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 11, 358–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, E. A. 1980. The relationship between mating system and simultaneous hermaphroditism in the coral-reef fish, Hypoplectrus nigricans (Serranidae). Animal Behaviour 28, 620–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, E. A. 1986. Mating systems of simultaneously hermaphroditic serranid fishes. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Indo-Pacific Fishes.
Fishelson, L. 1991. Comparative cytology and morphology of seminal vesicles in male gobiid fishes. Japanese Journal of Ichthyology 38, 17–30.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, J. L., Desjardins, J. K., Stiver, K. A., Montgomerie, R., and Balshine, S. 2006. Male reproductive suppression in the cooperatively breeding fish Neolamprologus pulcher. Behavioral Ecology 17, 25–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, I. A. 1996. Reproductive strategies of Atlantic salmon: ecology and evolution. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 6, 379–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, I. A. 1998. Pattern and variability in the breeding system of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), with comparisons to other salmonids. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55, 59–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, I. A. and Gross, M. R. 1994. Breeding competition in a pacific salmon (coho, Oncorhynchus kisutch): measures of natural and sexual selection. Evolution 48, 637–657.Google Scholar
Foote, C. J. 1990. An experimental comparison of male and female spawning territoriality in a pacific salmon. Behaviour 115, 283–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foote, C. J. and Larkin, P. A. 1988. The role of male choice in the assortative mating of anadromous and non-anadromous sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). Behaviour 106, 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foote, C. J., Brown, G. S., and Wood, C. C. 1997. Spawning success of males using alternative mating tactics in sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 54, 1785–1795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foran, C. M. and Bass, A. H. 1999. Preoptic GnRH and AVT: axes for sexual plasticity in teleist fish. General and Comparative Endocrinology 116, 141–152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frischknecht, M. 1993. The breeding coloration of male three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) as an indicator of energy investment and vigour. Evolutionary Ecology 7, 439–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, P., Neff, B. D., and Gross, M. R. 2001. Tactic-specific success in sperm competition. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 268, 1105–1112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gadgil, M. 1972. Male dimorphism as a consequence of sexual selection. American Naturalist 106, 574–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gage, M. J. G., Stockley, P., and Parker, G. A. 1995. Effects of alternative male mating strategies on characteristics of sperm production in the Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): theoretical and empirical investigations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 350, 391–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gage, M. J. G., Stockley, P., and Parker, G. A. 1998. Sperm morphometry in the Atlantic salmon. Journal of Fish Biology 53, 835–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gage, M. J. G., MacFarlane, C., Yeates, S., Shackleton, R., and Parker, G. A. 2002. Relationships between sperm morphometry and sperm motility in the Atlantic salmon. Journal of Fish Biology 61, 1528–1539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gage, M. J. G., Macfarlane, C. P., Yeates, S., et al. 2004. Spermatozoal traits and sperm competition in Atlantic salmon: relative sperm velocity is the primary determinant of fertilization success. Current Biology 14, 44–47.Google ScholarPubMed
Garant, D., Fontaine, P. M., Good, S. P., Dodson, J. J., and Bernatchez, L. 2002. The influence of male parental identity on growth and survival of offspring in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Evolutionary Ecology Research 4, 537–549.Google Scholar
Garant, D., Dodson, J. J., and Bernatchez, L. 2003. Differential reproductive success and heritability of alternative reproductive tactics in wild Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Evolution 57, 1133–1141.Google Scholar
Garant, D., Dodson, J. J., and Bernatchez, L. 2005. Offspring genetic diversity increases fitness of female Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 57, 240–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gile, S. R. and Ferguson, M. M. 1995. Factors affecting male potency in pooled gamete crosses of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Environmental Biology of Fishes 42, 267–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glebe, B. D. and Saunders, L. 1986. Genetic factors in sexual maturity of cultured Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) parr and adults reared in sea cages. In Meerburg, D. J. (ed.) Salmonid Age at Maturity, pp. 24–29.Google Scholar
Godin, J.-G. J. 1995. Predation risk and alternative mating tactics in male Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Oecologia 103, 224–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godwin, J., Luckenbach, J. A., and Borski, R. J. 2003. Ecology meets endocrinology: environmental sex determination in fishes. Evolution and Development 5, 40–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gomendio, M. and Roldan, E. M. S. 1991. Sperm competition influences sperm size in mammals. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 243, 181–185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gonçalves, D., Fagundes, T., and Oliveira, R. F. 2003. Reproductive behaviour of sneaker males of the peacock blenny. Journal of Fish Biology 63, 528–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonçalves, D., Matos, R., Fagundes, T., and Oliveira, R. F. 2005. Bourgeois males of the peacock blenny, Salaria pavo, discriminate female mimics from females?Ethology 111, 559–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonçalves, E. J., Almada, V. C., Oliveira, R. F., and Santos, A. J. 1996. Female mimicry as a mating tactic in males of the blenniid fish Salaria pavo. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 76, 529–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodson, J. L. and Bass, A. H. 2001. Social behavior functions and related anatomical characteristics of vasotocin/vasopressin systems in vertebrates. Brain Research Reviews 35, 246–265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grant, J. W. A., Bryant, M. J., and Soos, C. E. 1995. Operational sex ratio, mediated by synchrony of female arrival, alters the variance of male mating success in Japanese medaka. Animal Behaviour 49, 367–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grantner, A. and Taborsky, M. 1998. The metabolic rates associated with resting, and with the performance of agonistic, submissive and digging behaviours in the cichlid fish Neolamprologus pulcher (Pisces: Cichlidae). Journal of Comparative Physiology B 168, 427–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gronell, A. M. 1989. Visiting behavior by females of the sexually dichromatic damselfish, Chrysiptera cyanea (Teleostei, Pomecentridae): a probable method of assessing male quality. Ethology 81, 89–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, M. R. 1982. Sneakers, satellites and parentals: polymorphic mating strategies in North American sunfishes. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 60, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, M. R. 1984. Sunfish, salmon, and the evolution of alternative reproductive strategies and tactics in fishes. In Potts, G. and Wootton, R. J. (eds.) Fish Reproduction: Strategies and Tactics, pp. 55–75. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gross, M. R. 1985. Disruptive selection for alternative life histories in salmon. Nature 313, 47–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, M. R. 1991a. Salmon breeding behavior and life history evolution in changing environments. Ecology 72, 1180–1186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, M. R. 1991b. Evolution of alternative reproductive strategies: frequency-dependent sexual selection in male bluegill. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 332, 59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, M. R. 1996. Alternative reproductive strategies and tactics: diversity within sexes. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11, 92–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guilford, T. and Dawkins, M. S. 1991. Receiver psychology and the evolution of animal signals. Animal Behaviour 42, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hackney, P. A., Tatum, W. M., and Spencer, S. L. 1967. Life history study of the river redhorse, Moxostoma carinatum (Cope), in the Cahaba River, Alabama, with notes on the management of the species as a sport fish. Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference S. E. Association for Game and Fisheries Commerce, pp. 324–332.Google Scholar
Hagedorn, M. and Heiligenberg, W. 1985. Court and spark: electric signals in the courtship and mating of gymnotoid fish. Animal Behaviour 33, 254–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hager, R. C. and Noble, R. E. 1976. Relation of size at release of hatchery-reared coho salmon to age, size and sex composition of returning adults. Progressive Fish Culturist 38, 144–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, I. M. and Taborsky, M. 2005. Unrelated helpers will not fully compensate for costs imposed on breeders when they pay to stay. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 272, 445–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, I. M., Haesler, M. P., and Taborsky, M. 2006. Predators, reproductive parasites, and the persistence of poor males on leks. Behavioral Ecology 17, 97–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, A. J. and Smith, H. D. 1967. Mate selection in a population of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) of mixed age-groups. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 24, 1955–1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, P. H. and Pagel, M. D. 1991. The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hauser, M. D., Chen, M. K., Chen, F., Chuang, E., and Chuang, E. 2003. Give unto others: genetically unrelated cotton-top tamarin monkeys preferentially give food to those who altruistically give food back. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 270, 2363–2370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hazel, W. N., Smock, R., and Johnson, M. D. 1990. A polygenic model for the evolution and maintenance of conditional strategies. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 242, 181–187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Healey, M. C. and Prince, A. 1998. Alternative tactics in the breeding behaviour of male coho salmon. Behaviour 135, 1099–1124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, D. D., Rankin, L., Bryden, C. A., Heath, J. W., and Shrimpton, J. M. 2002. Heritability and Y-chromosome influence in the jack male life history of chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Heredity 89, 311–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heg, D. and Bachar, Z. 2006. Cooperative breeding in the Lake Tanganyika cichlid Julidochromis ornatus. Environmental Biology of Fishes 76, 265–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heg, D., Bender, N., and Hamilton, I. 2004. Strategic growth decisions in helper cichlids. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 271, S505–S508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heg, D., Bachar, Z., and Taborsky, M. 2005. Cooperative breeding and group structure in the Lake Tanganyika cichlid Neolamprologus savoryi. Ethology 111, 1017–1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heg, D., Bergmüller, R., Bonfils, D., et al. 2006. Cichlids do not adjust reproductive skew to the availability of independent breeding options. Behavioral Ecology 17, 419–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendry, A. P. and Stearns, S. C. (eds.) 2003. Evolution Illuminated: Salmon and Their Relatives. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Henson, S. A. and Warner, R. R. 1997. Male and female alternative reproductive behaviors in fishes: a new approach using intersexual dynamics. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28, 571–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hildemann, W. H. and Wagner, E. D. 1954. Intraspecific sperm competition in Lebistes reticulatus. American Naturalist 88, 87–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, J. P. A., Munday, P. L., and Jones, G. P. 2004. Social induction of maturation and sex determination in a coral reef fish. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 271, 2109–2114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, H. A. 2003. Functional genomics of neural and behavioral plasticity. Journal of Neurobiology 54, 272–282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hofmann, H. A., Benson, M. E., and Fernald, R. D. 1999. Social status regulates growth rate: consequences for life-history strategies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96, 14171–14176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hourigan, T. F., Nakamura, M., Nagahama, Y., Yamauchi, K., and Grau, E. G. 1991. Histology, ultrastructure, and in vitro steroidogenesis of the testes of two male phenotypes of the protogynous fish Thalassoma duperrey (Labridae). General and Comparative Endocrinology 83, 193–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoysak, D. J. and Liley, N. R. 2001. Fertilization dynamics in sockeye salmon and a comparison of sperm from alternative male phenotypes. Journal of Fish Biology 58, 1286–1300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoysak, D. J., Liley, N. R., and Taylor, E. B. 2004. Raffles, roles, and the outcome of sperm competition in sockeye salmon. Canadian Journal of Zoology/Revue Canadienne de Zoologie 82, 1017–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntingford, F. A., Lazarus, J., Barrie, B. D., and Webb, S. 1994. A dynamic analysis of cooperative predator inspection in sticklebacks. Animal Behaviour 47, 413–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchings, J. A. and Jones, M. E. B. 1998. Life history variation and growth rate thresholds for maturity in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55, 22–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchings, J. A. and Myers, R. A. 1987. Escalation of an asymmetric contest: mortality resulting from mate competition in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar. Canadian Journal of Zoology/Revue Canadienne de Zoologie 65, 766–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchings, J. A. and Myers, R. A. 1988. Mating success of alternative maturation phenotypes in male Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar. Oecologia 75, 169–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hutchings, J. A. and Myers, R. A. 1994. The evolution of alternative mating strategies in variable environments. Evolutionary Ecology 8, 256–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchings, J. A., Bishop, T. D., and McGregor-Shaw, C. R. 1999. Spawning behaviour of Atlantic cod, Gadus morhua: evidence of mate competition and mate choice in a broadcast spawner. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 56, 97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Immler, S., Mazzoldi, C., and Rasotto, M. B. 2004. From sneaker to parental male: change of reproductive traits in the black goby, Gobius niger (Teleostei: Gobiidae). Journal of Experimental Zoology 301A, 177–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, P. and Sexauer, H. 1997. Spawning behaviour, spawning habitat and alternative mating strategies in an adfluvial population of bull trout. In Mackay, W., Brewin, M., and Monita, M. (eds.) Friends of the Bull Trout Conference Proceedings, pp. 325–329.Google Scholar
Jamieson, B. G. M. 1991. Fish Evolution and Systematics: Evidence from Spermatozoa. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jennings, M. J. and Philipp, D. P. 1992. Reproductive investment and somatic growth rates in longear sunfish. Environmental Biology of Fishes 35, 257–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, R. A. 2000. Models of reproductive skew: a review and synthesis. Ethology 106, 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, A. G. and Avise, J. C. 1997a. Microsatellite analysis of maternity and the mating system in the Gulf pipefish Syngnathus scovelli, a species with male pregnancy and sex-role reversal. Molecular Ecology 6, 203–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, A. G. and Avise, J. C. 1997b. Polygynandry in the dusky pipefish Syngnathus floridae revealed by microsatellite DNA markers. Evolution 51, 1611–1622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, A. G. and Avise, J. C. 2001. Mating systems and sexual selection in male-pregnant pipefishes and seahorses: insights from microsatellite-based studies of maternity. Journal of Heredity 92, 150–158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, A. G., Ostlund-Nilsson, S., and Avise, J. C. 1998. A microsatellite assessment of sneaked fertilizations and egg thievery in the fifteenspine stickleback. Evolution 52, 848–858.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, A. G., Rosenqvist, G., Berglund, A., Arnold, S. J., and Avise, J. C. 2000. The Bateman gradient and the cause of sexual selection in a sex-role-reversed pipefish. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 267, 677–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, A. G., Walker, D., and Avise, J. C. 2001. Genetic evidence for extreme polyandry and extraordinary sex-role reversal in a pipefish. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 268, 2531–2535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, A. G., Rosenqvist, G., Berglund, A., and Avise, J. C. 2005. The measurement of sexual selection using Bateman's principles: an experimental test in the sex-role-reversed pipefish Syngnathus typhle. Integrative and Comparative Biology 45, 874–884.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, J. W. 1959. The Salmon. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Jones, J. W. and King, G. M. 1952. The spawning of the male salmon parr (Salmo salar Limn. juv). Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 122, 615–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, J. W. and Orton, J. H. 1940. The paedogenetic male cycle in Salmo salar L. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 128, 485–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, M. W. and Hutchings, J. A. 2002. Individual variation in Atlantic salmon fertilization success: implications for effective population size. Ecological Applications 12, 184–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonsson, B. and Jonsson, N. 2001. Polymorphism and speciation in Arctic charr. Journal of Fish Biology 58, 605–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, W. C. and Youngson, A. F. 1992. The use of genetic marking to assess the reproductive success of mature male Atlantic salmon parr (Salmo salar, L.) under natural spawning conditions. Journal of Fish Biology 41, 613–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kano, Y., Shimizu, Y., and Kondou, K. 2006. Status-dependent female mimicry in landlocked red-spotted masu salmon. Journal of Ethology 24, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanoh, Y. 1996. Pre-oviposition ejaculation in externally fertilizing fish: how sneaker male rose bitterlings contrive to mate. Ethology 102, 883–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karino, K. and Kobayashi, M. 2005. Male alternative mating behaviour depending on tail length of the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Behaviour 142, 191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karino, K. and Nakazono, A. 1993. Reproductive behavior of the territorial herbivore Stegastes nigricans (Pisces: Pomacentridae) in relation to colony formation. Journal of Ethology 11, 99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katoh, R., Munehara, H., and Kohda, M. 2005. Alternative male mating tactics of the substrate brooding cichlid Telmatochromis temporalis in Lake Tanganyika. Zoological Science 22, 555–561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kawase, H. and Nakazono, A. 1995. Predominant maternal egg care and promiscuous mating system in the Japanese filefish, Rudarius ercodes (Monacanthidae). Environmental Biology of Fishes 43, 241–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawase, H. and Nakazono, A. 1996. Two alternative female tactics in the polygynous mating system of the threadsail filefish, Stephanolepis cirrhifer (Monacanthidae). Ichthyological Research 43, 315–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kazakov, R. V. 1981. Peculiarities of sperm production by anadromous and parr Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) and fish cultural characteristics of such sperm. Journal of Fish Biology 18, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, L. and Reeve, H. K. 1994. Partitioning of reproduction in animal societies. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9, 98–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kellogg, K. A., Markert, J. A., Stauffer, J. R., and Kocher, T. D. 1998. Intraspecific brood mixing and reduced polyandry in a maternal mouth-brooding cichlid. Behavioral Ecology 9, 309–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ketterson, E. D. and Nolan, V. 1999. Adaptation, exaptation, and constraint: a hormonal perspective. American Naturalist 154, S4–S25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, S. J., Ogasawara, K., Park, J. G., Takemura, A., and Nakamura, M. 2002. Sequence and expression of androgen receptor and estrogen receptor gene in the sex types of protogynous wrasse, Halichoeres trimaculatus. General and Comparative Endocrinology 127, 165–173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knapp, R. 2003. Endocrine mediation of vertebrate male alternative reproductive tactics: the next generation of studies. Integrative and Comparative Biology 43, 658–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kodric-Brown, A. 1977. Reproductive success and the evolution of breeding territiories in pupfish (Cyprinodon). Evolution 31, 750–766.Google Scholar
Kodric-Brown, A. 1981. Variable breeding systems in pupfishes (Genus Cyprinodon): adaptions to changing environments. In Naiman, R. and Soltz, D. L. (eds.) Fishes in North American Deserts, pp. 205–235.Google Scholar
Kodric-Brown, A. 1986. Satellites and sneakers: opportunistic male breeding tactics in pupfish (Cyprinodon pecosensis). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 19, 425–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohda, M., Tanimura, M., Kikue-Nakamura, M., and Yamagishi, S. 1995. Sperm drinking by female catfishes: a novel mode of insemination. Environmental Biology of Fishes 42, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohler, U. 1998. Zur Struktur und Evolution des Sozialsystems von Neolamprologus multifasciatus (Cichlidae, Pisces), Dem Kleinsten Schneckenbuntbarsch des Tanganjikasees. Aachen, Germany: Shaker-Verlag.Google Scholar
Kortet, R., Vainikka, A., Rantala, M. J., Jokinen, I., and Taskinen, J. 2003. Sexual ornamentation, androgens and papillomatosis in male roach (Rutilus rutilus). Evolutionary Ecology Research 5, 411–419.Google Scholar
Kortet, R., Taskinen, J., Vainikka, A., and Ylonen, H. 2004a. Breeding tubercles, papillomatosis and dominance behaviour of male roach (Rutilus rutilus) during the spawning period. Ethology 110, 591–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kortet, R., Vainikka, A., Rantala, M. J., and Taskinen, J. 2004b. Sperm quality, secondary sexual characters and parasitism in roach (Rutilus rutilus L.). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 81, 111–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koseki, Y. and Fleming, I. A. 2006. Spatio-temporal dynamics of alternative male phenotypes in coho salmon populations in response to ocean environment. Journal of Animal Ecology 75, 445–455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koseki, Y. and Maekawa, K. 2000. Sexual selection on mature male parr of masu salmon (Oncorhynchus masou): does sneaking behavior favor small body size and less-developed sexual characters?Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 48, 211–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koseki, Y. and Maekawa, K. 2002. Differential energy allocation of alternative male tactics in masu salmon (Oncorhynchus masou). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 59, 1717–1723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koster, W. J. 1939. Some phases of the life history and relationships of the cyprinid, Clinostomus elongatus (Kirtland). Copeia, 201–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuwamura, T., Nakashima, Y., and Yogo, Y. 1994. Sex change in either direction by growth rate advantage in the monogamous coral goby, Paragobiodon echinocephalus. Behavioral Ecology 5, 434–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lahnsteiner, F. 2003. The spermatozoa and eggs of the cardinal fish. Journal of Fish Biology 62, 115–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lahnsteiner, F., Richtarski, U., and Patzner, R. A. 1990. Functions of the testicular gland in two blenniid fishes, Salaria (=Blennius) pavo and lipophrys (=Bleennius) delmatinus (Blenniidae, Teleosei) as revealed by electron microscopy and enzyme histochemistry. Journal of Fish Biology 37, 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lahnsteiner, F., Nussbaumer, B., and Patzner, R. A. 1993. Unusual testicular accessory organs, the testicular blind pouches of blennies (Teleostei, Blenniidae): fine structure, (enzyme) histochemistry and possible functions. Journal of Fish Biology 42, 227–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lahnsteiner, F., Berger, B., Weismann, T., and Patzner, R. A. 1998. Determination of semen quality of the rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, by sperm motility, seminal plasma parameters, and spermatozoal metabolism. Aquaculture 163, 163–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landry, C. and Bernatchez, L. 2001. Comparative analysis of population structure across environments and geographical scales at major histocompatibility complex and microsatellite loci in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Molecular Ecology 10, 2525–2539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laumen, J., Pern, U., and Blum, V. 1974. Investigations on function and hormonal regulation of anal appendices in Blennius pavo (Risso). Journal of Experimental Zoology 190, 47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, B. and Montgomerie, R. 2000. Sperm characteristics associated with different male reproductive tactics in bluegills (Lepomis macrochirus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 49, 31–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. S. F. 2005. Alternative reproductive tactics and status-dependent selection. Behavioral Ecology 16, 566–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. S. F. and Bass, A. H. 2004. Does exaggerated morphology preclude plasticity to cuckoldry in the midshipman fish (Porichthys notatus)?Naturwissenschaften 91, 338–341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lejeune, P. 1985. Etude écoéthologique des comportements reproducteurs et sociaux des Labridae méditerranéens des genres Symphodus Rafinesque, 1810 et Coris Lacepède, 1802. Cahiers d'Ethologie Appliquée 5, 1–208.Google Scholar
Lejeune, P. 1987. The effect of local stock density on social-behavior and sex change in the mediterranean labrid Coris julis. Environmental Biology of Fishes 18, 135–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Letcher, B. H. and Gries, G. 2003. Effects of life history variation on size and growth in stream-dwelling Atlantic salmon. Journal of Fish Biology 62, 97–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, S. K. and Owings, D. H. 1978. Sexual selection in the three-spined stickleback. 2. Nest raiding during the courtship phase. Behaviour 64, 298–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, W. M., Scott, A. P., Siefkes, M. J., et al. 2002. Bile acid secreted by male sea lamprey that acts acts as a sex pheromone. Science 296, 138–141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liley, N. R. and Stacey, N. E. 1983. Hormones, pheromones, and reproductive behavior in fish. In Hoar, W. S., Randall, D. J., and Donaldson, E. M. (eds.) Fish Physiology, pp. 1–63. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Liley, N. R., Tamkee, P., Tsai, R., and Hoysak, D. J. 2002. Fertilization dynamics in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): effect of male age, social experience, and sperm concentration and motility on in vitro fertilization. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 59, 144–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liljedal, S. and Folstad, I. 2003. Milt quality, parasites, and immune function in dominant and subordinate Arctic charr. Canadian Journal of Zoology/Revue Canadienne de Zoologie 81, 221–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linhart, O. 1984. Evaluation of sperm in some salmonids. Bulletin VURH Vodnany 20, 20–34.Google Scholar
Linhart, O., Rodina, M., Gela, D., Kocour, M., and Vandeputte, M. 2005. Spermatozoal competition in common carp (Cyprinus carpio): what is the primary determinant of competition success?Reproduction 130, 705–711.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Locatello, L., Mazzoldi, C., and Rasotto, M. B. 2002. Ejaculate of sneaker males is pheromonally inconspicuous in the black goby, Gobius niger (Teleostei, Gobiidae). Journal of Experimental Zoology 293, 601–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, G. Q. and Bernatchez, L. 1999. Correlated trophic specialization and genetic divergence in sympatric lake whitefish ecotypes (Coregonus clupeaformis): support for the ecological speciation hypothesis. Evolution 53, 1491–1505.Google ScholarPubMed
Lucas, J. R. and Howard, R. D. 1995. On alternative reproductive tactics in anurans: dynamic games with density and frequency dependence. American Naturalist 146, 365–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luttbeg, B. 2004. Female mate assessment and choice behavior affect the frequency of alternative male mating tactics. Behavioral Ecology 15, 239–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, M. E. and Taborsky, M. 2007. Sexual conflict over breeding substrate causes female expulsion and offspring loss in a cichlid fish. Behavioral Ecology, in press.Google Scholar
Macias-Garcia, C. and Saborio, E. 2004. Sperm competition in a viviparous fish. Environmental Biology of Fishes 70, 211–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackiewicz, M., Fletcher, D. E., Wilkins, S. D., DeWoody, J. A., and Avise, J. C. 2002. A genetic assessment of parentage in a natural population of dollar sunfish (Lepomis marginatus) based on microsatellite markers. Molecular Ecology 11, 1877–1883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackiewicz, M., Porter, B. A., Dakin, E. E., and Avise, J. C. 2005. Cuckoldry rates in the Molly Miller (Scartella cristata; Blenniidae), a hole-nesting marine fish with alternative reproductive tactics. Marine Biology 148, 213–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacWhirter, R. B. 1989. On the rarity of intraspecific brood parasitism. Condor 91, 485–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maekawa, K., Nakano, S., and Yamamoto, S. 1994. Spawning behavior and size assortative mating of Japanese charr in an artificial lake-inlet stream system. Environmental Biology of Fishes 39, 109–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maekawa, K., Iguchi, K., and Katano, O. 1996. Reproductive success in male Japanese minnows, Pseudorasbora parva: observations under experimental conditions. Ichthyological Research 43, 257–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnhagen, C. 1992. Alternative reproductive behaviour in the common goby, Pomatoschistus microps: an ontogenetic gradient?Animal Behaviour 44, 182–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malavasi, S., Torricelli, P., Lugli, M., Pranovi, F., and Mainardi, D. 2003. Male courtship sounds in a teleost with alternative reproductive tactics, the grass goby, Zosterisessor ophiocephalus. Environmental Biology of Fishes 66, 231–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mank, J. E. and Avise, J. C. 2006. Comparative phylogenetic analysis of male alternative reproductive tactics in ray-finned fishes. Evolution 60, 1311–1316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mansour, N., Lahnsteiner, F., and Patzner, R. A. 2004. Seminal vesicle secretion of African catfish, its composition, its behaviour in water and saline solutions and its influence on gamete fertilizability. Journal of Experimental Zoology A 301A, 745–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marconato, A., Rasotto, M. B., and Mazzoldi, C. 1996. On the mechanism of sperm release in three gobiid fishes (Teleostei: Gobiidae). Environmental Biology of Fishes 46, 321–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, D. J., Steinberg, P. D., and Evans, J. P. 2004. The early sperm gets the good egg: mating order effects in free spawners. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 271, 1585–1589.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, E. and Taborsky, M. 1997. Alternative male mating tactics in a cichlid, Pelvicachromis pulcher: a comparison of reproductive effort and success. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 41, 311–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. 1982. Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazzoldi, C. and Rasotto, M. B. 2002. Alternative male mating tactics in Gobius niger. Journal of Fish Biology 61, 157–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazzoldi, C., Scaggiante, M., Ambrosin, E., and Rasotto, M. B. 2000. Mating system and alternative male mating tactics in the grass goby Zosterisessor ophiocephalus (Teleostei: Gobiidae). Marine Biology 137, 1041–1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazzoldi, C., Petersen, C. W., and Rasotto, M. B. 2005. The influence of mating system on seminal vesicle variability among gobies (Teleostei, Gobiidae). Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 43, 307–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mboko, S. K. and Kohda, M. 1999. Piracy mating by large males in a monogamous substrate-breeding cichlid in Lake Tanganyika. Journal of Ethology 17, 51–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCart, P. 1970. A polymorphic population of Oncorhynchus nerka in Babine Lake, British Columbia. Ph.D. thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
McKaye, K. R. and McKaye, N. M. 1977. Communal care and kidnapping of young by parental cichlids. Evolution 31, 674–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKaye, K. R. and Oliver, M. K. 1980. Geometry of a selfish school: defense of cichlid young by bagrid catfish in Lake Malawi, Africa. Animal Behaviour 28, 1287–1292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKaye, K. R., Mughogho, D. E., and Lovullo, T. J. 1992. Formation of the selfish school. Environmental Biology of Fishes 35, 213–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meidl, P. 1999. Microsatellite analysis of alternative mating tactics in Lamprologus callipterus. Diploma thesis, University of Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, N. B. and Thorpe, J. E. 1990. Determinants of geographical variation in the age of seaward migrating salmon, Salmo salar. Journal of Animal Ecology 59, 135–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcalfe, N. B., Huntingford, F. A., and Thorpe, J. E. 1988. Feeding intensity, growth rates, and the establishment of life history patterns in juvenile Atlantic salmon Salmo salar. Journal of Animal Ecology 57, 463–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcalfe, N. B., Huntingford, F. A., Graham, W. D., and Thorpe, J. E. 1989. Early social status and the develoment of life history strategies in Atlantic salmon. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 236, 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, A. 1987. Phenotypic plasticity and heterochrony in Cichlasoma managuense (Pisces, Cichlidae) and their implications for speciation in cichlid fishes. Evolution 41, 1357–1369.Google ScholarPubMed
Milinski, M. 1987. Tit for tat in sticklebacks and the evolution of cooperation. Nature 325, 433–435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milinski, M., Külling, D., and Kettler, R. 1990a. Tit for tat: sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) “trusting” a cooperating partner. Behavioral Ecology 1, 7–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milinski, M., Pfluger, D., and Küelling, D. K. 1990b. Do sticklebacks cooperate repeatedly in reciprocal pairs?Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 27, 17–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, P. J. 1984. The tokology of gobiid fishes. In Potts, G. W. and Wootton, R. J. (eds.) Fish Reproduction: Strategies and Tactics, pp. 119–154. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Miura, T., Yamauchi, K., Takahashi, H., and Nagahama, Y. 1992. The role of hormones in the acquisition of sperm motility in salmonid fish. Journal of Experimental Zoology 261, 359–363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mjolnerod, I. B., Fleming, I. A., Refseth, U. H., and Hindar, K. 1998. Mate and sperm competition during multiple-male spawnings of Atlantic salmon. Canadian Journal of Zoology/Revue Canadienne de Zoologie 76, 70–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, A. and Scott, A. P. 1991. Testosterone is a potent odorant in precocious male Atlantic Salmon (salmo salar L.) parr. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 332, 241–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, M. C. 1991. Application of organization-activation theory to alternative male reproductive strategies : a review. Hormones and Behavior 25, 154–179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, M. C., Hews, D. K., and Knapp, R. 1998. Hormonal control and evolution of alternative male phenotypes: generalizations of models for sexual differentiation. American Zoologist 38, 133–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, D. 1952. Homosexuality in the ten-spined stickleback (Pygosteus pungitius L.). Behaviour 4, 233–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyer, J. T. 1979. Mating strategies and reproductive behavior of ostraciid fishes at Miyake-Jima, Japan. Japanese Journal of Ichthyology 26, 148–160.Google Scholar
Mrowka, W. 1987. Egg stealing in a mouthbrooding cichlid fish. Animal Behaviour 35, 923–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munday, P. L., Buston, P. M., and Warner, R. R. 2006. Diversity and flexibility of sex-change strategies in animals. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21, 89–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Munehara, H. 1988. Spawning and subsequent copulating behavior of the elkhorn sculpin Alcichthys alcicornis in an aquarium. Japanese Journal of Ichthyology 35, 358–364.Google Scholar
Munehara, H. and Takenaka, O. 2000. Microsatellite markers and multiple paternity in a paternal care fish, Hexagrammus otakii. Journal of Ethology 18, 101–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munehara, H., Takano, K., and Koya, Y. 1989. Internal gametic association and external fertilization in the elkhorn sculpin, Alcichthys alcicornis. Copeia, 673–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munehara, H., Okamoto, H., and Shimazaki, K. 1990. Paternity estimated by isozyme variation in the marine sculpin Alcichthys alcicornis (Pisces, Cottidae) exhibiting copulation and paternal care. Journal of Ethology 8, 21–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munehara, H., Takano, K., and Koya, Y. 1991. The little dragon sculpin Blespias cirrhosus: another case of internal gametic association and external fertilization. Japanese Journal of Ichthyology 37, 391–394.Google Scholar
Munoz, R. C. and Warner, R. R. 2003. Alternative contexts of sex change with social control in the bucktooth parrotfish, Sparisoma radians. Environmental Biology of Fishes 68, 307–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munoz, R. C. and Warner, R. R. 2004. Testing a new version of the size-advantage hypothesis for sex change: sperm competition and size-skew effects in the bucktooth parrotfish, Sparisoma radians. Behavioral Ecology 15, 129–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narimatsu, Y. and Munehara, H. 2001. Territoriality egg desertion and mating success of a paternal care fish, Hypoptychus dybowskii (Gasterosteiformes). Behaviour 138, 85–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neat, F. C. 2001. Male parasitic spawning in two species of triplefin blenny (Tripterigiidae): contrasts in demography, behaviour and gonadal characteristics. Environmental Biology of Fishes 61, 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neat, F. C., Locatello, L., and Rasotto, M. B. 2003a. Reproductive morphology in relation to alternative male reproductive tactics in Scartella cristata. Journal of Fish Biology 62, 1381–1391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neat, F. C., Lengkeek, W., Westerbeek, E. P., Laarhoven, B., and Videler, J. J. 2003b. Behavioural and morphological differences between lake and river populations of Salaria fluviatilis. Journal of Fish Biology 63, 374–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neff, B. D. 2001. Genetic paternity analysis and breeding success in bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). Journal of Heredity 92, 111–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neff, B. D. 2003. Decisions about parental care in response to perceived paternity. Nature 422, 716–719.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neff, B. D. 2004. Increased performance of offspring sired by parasitic males in bluegill sunfish. Behavioral Ecology 15, 327–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neff, B. D. and Gross, M. R. 2001. Dynamic adjustment of parental care in response to perceived paternity. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 268, 1559–1565.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neff, B. D. and Sherman, P. W. 2005. In vitro fertilization reveals offspring recognition via self-referencing in a fish with paternal care and cuckoldry. Ethology 111, 425–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neff, B. D. and Wahl, L. M. 2004. Mechanisms of sperm competition: testing the fair raffle. Evolution 58, 1846–1851.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neff, B. D., Fu, P., and Gross, M. R. 2003. Sperm investment and alternative mating tactics in bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). Behavioral Ecology 14, 634–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nikolsky, G. V. 1963. The Ecology of Fishes. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Njiwa, J. R. K., Muller, P., and Klein, R. 2004. Variations of sperm release in three batches of zebrafish. Journal of Fish Biology 64, 475–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noe, R. 2006. Cooperation experiments: coordination through communication versus acting apart together. Animal Behaviour 71, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowak, M. A., Sasaki, A., Taylor, C., and Fudenberg, D. 2004. Emergence of cooperation and evolutionary stability in finite populations. Nature 428, 646–650.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ochi, H. 1993. Mate monopolization by a dominant male in a multi-male social group of a mouthbrooding cichlid Ctenochromis horei. Japanese Journal of Ichthyology 40, 209–218.Google Scholar
Ochi, H. and Yanagisawa, Y. 1996. Interspecific brood-mixing in Tanganyikan cichlids. Environmental Biology of Fishes 45, 141–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochi, H. and Yanagisawa, Y. 2005. Farming-out of offspring is a predominantly male tactics in a biparental mouthbrooding cichlid Perrisodus microlepis. Environmental Biology of Fishes 73, 335–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochi, H., Yanagisawa, Y., and Omori, K. 1995. Intraspecific brood mixing of the cichlid fish Perissodus microlepis in Lake Tanganyika. Environmental Biology of Fishes 43, 201–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochi, H., Onchi, T., and Yanagisawa, Y. 2001. Alloparental care between catfishes in Lake Tanganyika. Journal of Fish Biology 59, 1279–1286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohnishi, N., Yanagisawa, Y., and Kohda, M. 1997. Sneaking by harem masters of the sandperch, Parapercis snyderi. Environmental Biology of Fishes 50, 217–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okuda, N., Ito, S., and Iwao, H. 2003. Female mimicry in a freshwater goby Rhinogobius sp. OR. Ichthyological Research 50, 198–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, R. F. 2004. Social Modulation of Androgens in Vertebrates: Mechanisms and Function.
Oliveira, R. F. 2006. Neuroendocrine mechanisms of alternative reproductive tactics in fish. In Sloman, K. A., Wilson, R. W., and Balshine, S. (eds.) Behaviour: Interactions with Physiology, New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Oliveira, R. F., Almada, V. C., Gonçalves, E. J., Forsgren, E., and Canario, A. V. M. 2001a. Androgen levels and social interactions in breeding males of the peacock blenny. Journal of Fish Biology 58, 897–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, R. F., Canario, A. V. M., and Grober, M. S. 2001b. Male sexual polymorphism, alternative reproductive tactics, and androgens in combtooth blennies (Pisces: Blenniidae). Hormones and Behavior 40, 266–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, R. F., Canario, A. V. M., Grober, M. S., and Santos, R. S. 2001c. Endocrine correlates of male polymorphism and alternative reproductive tactics in the Azorean rock-pool blenny, Parablennius sanguinolentus parvicornis. General and Comparative Endocrinology 121, 278–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, R. F., Carneiro, L. A., Gonçalves, D. M., Canario, A. V. M., and Grober, M. S. 2001d. 11-ketotestosterone inhibits the alternative mating tactic in sneaker males of the peacock blenny, Salaria pavo. Brain Behavior and Evolution 58, 28–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, R. F., Carneiro, L. A., Canario, A. V. M., and Grober, M. S. 2001e. Effects of androgens on social behavior and morphology of alternative reproductive males of the azorean rock-pool blenny. Hormones and Behavior 39, 157–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, R. F., Gonçalves, E. J., and Santos, R. S. 2001f. Gonadal investment of young males in two blenniid fishes with alternative mating tactics. Journal of Fish Biology 59, 459–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, R. F., Carvalho, N., Miranda, J., et al. 2002a. The relationship between the presence of satellite males and nest-holders' mating success in the Azorean rock-pool blenny Parablennius sanguinolentus parvicornis. Ethology 108, 223–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, R. F., Hirschenhauser, K., Carneiro, L. A., and Canario, A. V. M. 2002b. Social modulation of androgen levels in male teleost fish. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology B 132, 203–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, R. F., Hirschenhauser, K., Canario, A. V. M., and Taborsky, M. 2003. Androgen levels of reproductive competitors in a co-operatively breeding cichlid. Journal of Fish Biology 63, 1615–1620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, R. F., Ros, A. F. H., and Gonçalves, D. M. 2005. Intra-sexual variation in male reproduction in teleost fish: a comparative approach. Hormones and Behavior 48, 430–439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olsson, P. E., Berg, A. H., Hofsten, J., et al. 2005. Molecular cloning and characterization of a nuclear androgen receptor activated by 11-ketotestosterone. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 3, 00–00.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orton, J. H., Jones, J. W., and King, G. M. 1938. The male sexual stage in salmon parr (Salmo salar L. juv.). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 125, 103–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ota, D., Marchesan, M., and Ferrero, E. A. 1996. Sperm release behaviour and fertilization in the grass goby. Journal of Fish Biology 49, 246–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ota, K. and Kohda, M. 2006a. Description of alternative male reproductive tactics in a shell-brooding cichlid, Telmatochromis vittatus in Lake Tanganyika. Journal of Ethology 24, 9–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ota, K. and Kohda, M. 2006b. Nest use by territorial males in a shell-brooding cichlid: the effect of reproductive parasitism. Journal of Ethology 24, 91–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pachler, G. 2001. Growth, spawning behavior, and ejaculate characteristics: adaptations to sperm competition in Lamprologus callipterus. Diploma thesis, University of Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Page, L. M. and Johnston, C. E. 1990. Spawning in the creek chubsucker, Erimyzon oblongus, with a review of spawning behavior in suckers (Catostomidae). Environmental Biology of Fishes 27, 265–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, G. A. 1984. Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating strategies. In Smith, R. L. (ed.) Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems, pp. 1–60. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Parker, G. A. 1990a. Sperm competition games: raffles and roles. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 242, 120–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, G. A. 1990b. Sperm competition games: sneaks and extra-pair copulations. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 242, 127–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, G. A. 1993. Sperm competition games: sperm size and sperm number under adult control. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 253, 245–254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parker, G. A. and Ball, M. A. 2005. Sperm competition, mating rate and the evolution of testis and ejaculate sizes: a population model. Biology Letters 1, 235–238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parker, G. A. and Begon, M. E. 1993. Sperm competition games: sperm size and sperm number under gametic control. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 253, 255–262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parker, G. A., Ball, M. A., Stockley, P., and Gage, M. J. G. 1996. Sperm competition games: individual assessment of sperm competition intensity by group spawners. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 263, 1291–1297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, H. H., Noonburg, E. G., and Nisbet, R. M. 2001. Models of alternative life-history strategies, population structure and potential speciation in salmonid fish stocks. Journal of Animal Ecology 70, 260–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pastres, R., Pranovi, F., Libralato, S., Malavasi, S., and Torricelli, P. 2002. “Birthday effect” on the adoption of alternative mating tactics in Zosterisessor ophiocephalus: evidence from a growth model. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 82, 333–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, C. W. 1987. Reproductive behaviour and gender allocation in Serranus fasciatus, a hermaphroditic reef fish. Animal Behavior 35, 1601–1614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, C. W. 1990. The relationship among population density, individual size, mating tactics and reproductive success in a hermaphroditic fish, Serranus fasciatus. Behaviour 113, 57–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, C. W. 1995. Reproductive behavior, egg trading, and correlates of male mating success in the simultaneous hermaphrodite, Serranus tabacarius. Environmental Biology of Fishes 43, 351–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, C. W. and Fischer, E. A. 1986. Mating system of the hermaphroditic coral-reef fish, Serranus baldwini. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 19, 171–178.Google Scholar
Petersen, C. W. and Fischer, E. A. 1996. Intraspecific variation in sex allocation in a simultaneous hermaphrodite: the effect of individual size. Evolution 50, 636–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, C. W. and Warner, R. R. 1998. Sperm competition in fishes. In Birkhead, T. R. and Moller, A. P. (eds.) Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection, pp. 435–463. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Petersen, C. W., Warner, R. R., Shapiro, D. Y., and Marconato, A. 2001. Components of fertilization success in the bluehead wrasse, Thalassoma bifasciatum. Behavioral Ecology 12, 237–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrie, M. and Kempenaers, B. 1998. Extra-pair paternity in birds: explaining variation between species and populations. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13, 52–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pfennig, D. W. 1992. Polyphenism in spadefoot toad tadpoles as a locally adjusted evolutionarily stable strategy. Evolution 46, 1408–1420.Google ScholarPubMed
Picciulin, M., Verginella, L., Spoto, M., and Ferrero, E. A. 2004. Colonial nesting and the importance of the brood size in male parasitic reproduction of the Mediterranean damselfish Chromis chromis (Pisces: Pomacentridae). Environmental Biology of Fishes 70, 23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pigeon, D., Chouinard, A., and Bernatchez, L. 1997. Multiple modes of speciation involved in the parallel evolution of sympatric morphotypes of lake whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis, Salmonidae). Evolution 51, 196–205.Google Scholar
Piironen, J. and Hyvärinen, H. 1983. Composition of the milt of some teleost fishes. Journal of Fish Biology 22, 351–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilastro, A. and Bisazza, A. 1999. Insemination efficiency of two alternative male mating tactics in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 266, 1887–1891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilastro, A., Scaggiante, M., and Rasotto, M. B. 2002. Individual adjustment of sperm expenditure accords with sperm competition theory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99, 9913–9915.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pilastro, A., Simonato, M., Bisazza, A., and Evans, J. P. 2004. Cryptic female preference for colorful males in guppies. Evolution 58, 665–669.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pitcher, T. E., Neff, B. D., Rodd, F. H., and Rowe, L. 2003. Multiple mating and sequential mate choice in guppies: females trade up. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 270, 1623–1629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poncin, P., Jeandarme, J., Rinchard, J., and Kestemont, P. 1997. Preliminary results on the spawning behaviour of the gudgeon, Gobio gobio, in aquarium. Bulletin Français de la Pêche et de la Pisciculture, 547–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, T. P. and Myers, K. W. 2004. Anadromy and the marine migrations of Pacific salmon and trout: Rounsefell revisited. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 14, 421–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ragland, H. C. and Fischer, E. A. 1987. Internal fertilization and male parental care in the scalyhead sculpin, Artedius harringtoni. Copeia, 1059–1062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raney, E. C. 1940. Comparison of the breeding habits of two subspecies of black-nosed dace, Rhinichthys atratulus (Hermann). American Midland Naturalist 23, 399–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasotto, M. B. and Mazzoldi, C. 2002. Male traits associated with alternative reproductive tactics in Gobius niger. Journal of Fish Biology 61, 173–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeve, H. K., Emlen, S. T., and Keller, L. 1998. Reproductive sharing in animal societies: reproductive incentives or incomplete control by dominant breeders?Behavioral Ecology 9, 267–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichard, M., Smith, C., and Jordan, W. C. 2004a. Genetic evidence reveals density-dependent mediated success of alternative mating behaviours in the European bitterling (Rhodeus sericeus). Molecular Ecology 13, 1569–1578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichard, M., Jurajda, P., and Smith, C. 2004b. Male–male interference competition decreases spawning rate in the European bitterling (Rhodeus sericeus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 56, 34–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reighard, J. 1920. The breeding behaviors of the suckers and minnows. 1. The suckers. Biological Bulletin 38, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reighard, J. 1943. The breeding habits of the river chub, Nocomis micropogon (Cope). Papers of the Michigan Academy of Sciences, Arts and Letters 28, 397–423.Google Scholar
Reinboth, R. 1962. Morphologische und funktionelle Zweigeschlechtlichkeit bei marinen Teleostern (Serranidae, Sparidae, Centracanthidae, Labridae). Zoologisches Jahrbuch (Phyisologie) 69, 405–480.Google Scholar
Reynolds, J. D., Debuse, V. J., and Aldridge, D. C. 1997. Host specialisation in an unusual symbiosis: European bitterlings spawning in freshwater mussels. Oikos 78, 539–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reznick, D. 1981. Grandfather effects: the genetics of inter-population differences in offspring size in the mosquito fish. Evolution 35, 941–953.Google Scholar
Reznick, D. 1982. Genetic determination of offspring size in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). American Naturalist 120, 181–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhen, T. and Crews, D. 2002. Variation in reproductive behaviour within a sex: neural systems and endocrine activation. Journal of Neuroendocrinology 14, 517–531.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ribbink, A. J., Marsh, A. C., Marsh, B., and Sharp, B. J. 1980. Parental behavior and mixed broods among cichlid fish of Lake Malawi. South African Journal of Zoology 15, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richtarski, U. and Patzner, R. A. 2000. Comparative morphology of male reproductive systems in Mediterranean blennies (Blenniidae). Journal of Fish Biology 56, 22–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rico, C., Kuhnlein, U., and FitzGerald, G. J. 1992. Male reproductive tactics in the threespine stickleback: an evaluation by DNA fingerprinting. Molecular Ecology 1, 79–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riddell, B. E., Leggett, W. C., and Saunders, R. L. 1981. Evidence of adaptive polygenic variation between two populations of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) native to tributaries of the SW Miramichi River, NB. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 38, 321–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rios-Cardenas, O. and Webster, A. S. 2005. Paternity and paternal effort in the pumpkinseed sunfish. Behavioral Ecology 16, 914–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, D. R. and Choat, J. H. 1974. Protogynous hermaphroditism and social systems in labrid fish. Proceedings of the 2nd International Coral Reef Symposium 1, 217–225.Google Scholar
Robertson, D. R. and Warner, R. R. 1978. Sexual patterns in the labrid fishes of the Western Caribbean. 2. The parrotfishes (Scaridae). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 255, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, D. R., Reinboth, R., and Bruce, R. W. 1982. Gonochorism, protogyneous sex-change and spawning in three sparisomatinine parrotfishes from the western Indian Ocean. Bulletin of Marine Science 32, 868–879.Google Scholar
Robinson, B. W. and Wilson, D. S. 1994. Character release and displacement in fishes: a neglected literature. American Naturalist 144, 596–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, G. E., Grozinger, C. M., and Whitfield, C. W. 2005. Sociogenomics: social life in molecular terms. Nature Reviews Genetics 6, 257–316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ros, A. F. H., Bouton, N., Santos, R. S., and Oliveira, R. F. 2006. Alternative male reproductive tactics and the immunocompetence handicap in the Azorean rock-pool blenny, Parablennius parvicornis. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 273, 901–909.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenqvist, G. 1990. Male mate choice and female–female competition for mates in the pipefish Nerophis ophidion. Animal Behaviour 39, 1110–1115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, R. M. 1989. The evolution of sex-change mechanisms in fishes. Environmental Biology of Fishes 19, 81–93.Google Scholar
Rossiter, A. and Yamagishi, S. 1997. Intraspecific plasticity in the social system and mating behaviour of a lek-breeding cichlid fish. In Kawanabe, H., Hori, M., and Nagoshi, M. (eds.) Fish Communities in Lake Tanganyika, pp. 193–217. Kyoto, Japan: Kyoto University Press.Google Scholar
Rowe, D. K. and Thorpe, J. E. 1990. Differences in growth between maturing and non-maturing male Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., parr. Journal of Fish Biology 36, 643–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowland, W. J. 1979. Stealing fertilizations in the fourspine stickleback, Apeltes quadracus. American Naturalist 114, 602–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royce, W. F. 1951. Breeding habits of lake trout in New York. Fishery Bulletin 59, 59–76.Google Scholar
Ruchon, F., Laugier, T. and Quignard, J. P. 1995. Alternative male reproductive strategies in the peacock blenny. Journal of Fish Biology 47, 826–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudolfsen, G., Figenschou, L., Folstad, I., Nordeide, J. T., and Soreng, E. 2005. Potential fitness benefits from mate selection in the Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua). Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18, 172–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudolfsen, G., Figenschou, L., Folstad, I., Tveiten, H., and Figenschou, M. 2006. Rapid adjustments of sperm characteristics in relation to social status. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 273, 325–332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rutte, C. and Taborsky, M. 2007a. Generalized reciprocity in rats. PLoS Biology 5, 1421–1425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutte, C. and Taborsky, M. 2007b. The influence of social experience on cooperative behaviour of rats (Rattus norvegicus): direct vs. generalized reciprocity. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, DOI: 10.1007/s00265-007-0474-3.CrossRef
Ryan, M. J. and Causey, B. 1989. Alternative mating behaviour in the sword tails Xiphophorus pygmaeus (Pisces: Poeciliidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 24, 341–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, M. J., Hews, D. K., and Wagner, W. E. 1990. Sexual selection on alleles that determine body size in the swordtail Xiphophorus nigrensis. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 26, 231–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, M. J., Pease, C. M., and Morris, M. R. 1992. A genetic polymorphism in the swordtail, Xiphophorus nigrensis: testing the prediction of equal fitnesses. American Naturalist 139, 21–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sage, R. D. and Selander, R. K. 1975. Trophic radiation through polymorphism in cichlid fishes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 72, 4669–4673.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santos, R. S. 1985. Parentais e satélites: tácticas alternativas de acasalamento nos machos de Blennius sanguinolentus pallas (Pisces: Blenniidae). Arquipélago: Life and marine Sciences 6, 119–146.Google Scholar
Sargent, R. C. 1989. Allopaternal care in the fathead minnow, Pimephales promelas: stepfathers discriminate against their adopted eggs. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 25, 379–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sato, T. 1994. Active accumulation of spawning substrate: a determinant of extreme polygyny in a shell-brooding cichlid fish. Animal Behaviour 48, 669–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sato, T. and Gashagaza, M. M. 1997. shell-brooding cichlid fishes of Lake Tanganyika: their habitats and mating systems. In kawanabe, H., Hori, M., and Nagoshi, M. eds. Fish communities in Lake Tanganyika pp. 221–240. Kyoto, Japan: Kyoto University Press.Google Scholar
Scaggiante, M., Mazzoldi, C., Petersen, C. W., and Rasotto, M. B. 1999. Sperm competition and mode of fertilization in the grass goby Zosterisessor ophiocephalus (Teleostei: Gobiidae). Journal of Experimental Zoology 283, 81–90.3.0.CO;2-9>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scaggiante, M., Grober, M. S., Lorenzi, V., and Rasotto, M. B. 2004. Changes along the male reproductive axis in response to social context in a gonochoristic gobiid, Zosterisessor ophiocephalus (Teleostei, Gobiidae), with alternative mating tactics. Hormones and Behavior 46, 607–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scaggiante, M., Grober, M. S., Lorenzi, V., and Rasotto, M. B. 2006. Variability of GnRH secretion in two goby species with socially controlled alternative male mating tactics. Hormones and Behavior 50, 107–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schärer, L. and Robertson, D. R. 1999. Sperm and milt characteristics and male v. female gametic investment in the Caribbean reef fish, Thalassoma bifasciatum. Journal of Fish Biology 55, 329–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schröder, S. L. 1981. The Role of Sexual Selection in Determining Overall Mating Patterns and Mate Choice in Chum Salmon. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Schröder, S. L. 1982. The influence of intrasexual competition on the distribution of chum salmon in an experimental stream. (Ed. by E. L. Brannon & E.O. Salo), pp. 275–285. Seattle, School of Fisheries, University of Washington.
Schulte-Hostedde, A. I. and Burness, G. 2005. Fertilization dynamics of sperm from different male mating tactics in bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus). Canadian Journal of Zoology/Revue Canadienne de Zoologie 83, 1638–1642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schütz, D. and Taborsky, M. 2000. Giant males or dwarf females: what determines the extreme sexual size dimorphism in Lamprologus callipterus?Journal of Fish Biology 57, 1254–1265.Google Scholar
Schütz, D. and Taborsky, M. 2005. The influence of sexual selection and ecological constraints on an extreme sexual size dimorphism in a cichlid. Animal Behaviour 70, 539–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schütz, D., Parker, G. A., Taborsky, M., and Sato, T. 2006. An optimality approach to male and female body sizes in an extremely size-dimorphic cichlid fish. Evolutionary Ecology Research 8, 1393–1408.Google Scholar
Seamons, T. R., Bentzen, P., and Quinn, T. P. 2004. The mating system of steelhead, Oncorhynchus mykiss, inferred by molecular analysis of parents and progeny. Environmental Biology of Fishes 69, 333–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, D. Y. 1987. Differentiation and evolution of sex change in fishes. BioScience 37, 490–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, D. Y., Marconato, A., and Yoshikawa, T. 1994. Sperm economy in a coral reef fish, Thalassoma bifasciatum. Ecology 75, 1334–1344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shibuno, T., Chiba, I., Gushima, K., Kakuda, S., and Hashimoto, H. 1993. Reproductive behavior of the wrasse, Halichoeres marginatus, at Kuchierabu-jima. Japanese Journal of Ichthyology 40, 351–359.Google Scholar
Shuster, S. M. and Wade, M. J. 1991. Female copying and sexual selection in a marine isopod crustacean. Animal Behaviour 42, 1071–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shuster, S. M. and Wade, M. J. 2003. Mating Systems and Strategies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sigurjonsdottir, H. and Gunnarsson, K. 1989. Alternative mating tactics of arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus, in Thingvallavatn, Iceland. Environmental Biology of Fishes 26, 159–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. and Reichard, M. 2005. Females solicit sneakers to improve fertilization success in the bitterling fish (Rhodeus sericeus). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 272, 1683–1688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C., Douglas, A., and Jurajda, P. 2002. Sexual conflict, sexual selection and sperm competition in the spawning decisions of bitterling, Rhodeus sericeus. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 51, 433–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C., Reichard, M., Jurajda, P., and Przybylski, M. 2004. The reproductive ecology of the European bitterling (Rhodeus sericeus). Journal of Zoology 262, 107–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snook, R. R. 2005. Sperm in competition: not playing by the numbers. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20, 46–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snorrason, S. S. and Skúlason, S. 2004. Adaptive speciation in northern freshwater fishes: patterns and processes. In Dieckmann, U., Metz, H., Doebeli, M., and Tautz, D. (eds.) Adaptive Speciation, pp. 210–228. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sogard, S. M. 1997. Size-selective mortality in the juvenile stage of teleost fishes: a review. Bulletin of Marine Science 60, 1129–1157.Google Scholar
Spahni, C. 2005. Indirect reciprocity in rats. Master's thesis, University of Berne, Switzerland.
Stacey, N. 2003. Hormones, pheromones and reproductive behavior. Fish Physiology and Biochemistry 28, 229–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stacey, N., Chojnacki, A., Narayanan, A., Cole, T., and Murphy, C. 2003. Hormonally derived sex pheromones in fish: exogenous cues and signals from gonad to brain. Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology 81, 329–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, D. W., Anderson, J., and Benson, K. E. 1997. On the spurious occurrence of tit for tat in pairs of predator-approaching fish. Animal Behaviour 53, 111–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, D. W., McLinn, C. M., and Stevens, J. R. 2002. Discounting and reciprocity in an iterated prisoner's dilemma. Science 298, 2216–2218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiver, K. A., Dierkes, P., Taborsky, M., and Balshine, S. 2004. Dispersal patterns and status change in a co-operatively breeding cichlid, Neolamprologus pulcher: evidence from microsatellite analyses and behavioural observations. Journal of Fish Biology 65, 91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiver, K. A., Dierkes, P., Taborsky, M., Gibbs, H. L., and Balshine, S. 2005. Relatedness and helping in fish: examining the theoretical predictions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 272, 1593–1599.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stockley, P. 1997. Sexual conflict resulting from adaptations to sperm competition. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 12, 154–159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stockley, P., Gage, M. J. G., Parker, G. A., and Moller, A. P. 1996. Female reproductive biology and the coevolution of ejaculate characteristics in fish. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 263, 451–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockley, P., Gage, M. J. G., Parker, G. A., and Moller, A. P. 1997. Sperm competition in fishes: the evolution of testis size and ejaculate characteristics. American Naturalist 149, 933–954.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stoltz, J. A. and Neff, B. D. 2006. Male size and mating tactic influence proximity to females during sperm competition in bluegill sunfish. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 59, 811–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoltz, J. A., Neff, B. D., and Olden, J. D. 2005. Allometric growth and sperm competition in fishes. Journal of Fish Biology 67, 470–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuart-kregor, P. A. C., Sumpter, J. P., and Dodd, J. M. 1981. The involvement of gonodatropin and sex steroids in the control of reproduction in the parr and adults of the Atlantic Salmon, salmo salar. Journal of Fish Biology 18, 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunobe, T. and Nakazono, A. 1993. Sex-change in both directions by alteration of social dominance in Trimma okinawae (Pisces, Gobiidae). Ethology 94, 339–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sveinsson, T. and Hara, T. J. 1995. Mature males of Arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus, release F-type prostaglandins to attract conspecific mature females and stimulate their spawning behaviour. Environmental Biology of Fishes 42, 253–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taborsky, M. 1984. Broodcare helpers in the cichlid fish Lamprologus brichardi: their costs and benefits. Animal Behaviour 32, 1236–1252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taborsky, M. 1985. Breeder–helper conflict in a cichlid fish with broodcare helpers: an experimental analysis. Behaviour 95, 45–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taborsky, M. 1987. Cooperative behaviour in fish: coalitions, kin groups and reciprocity. In Ito, Y., Brown, J. L., and Kikkawa, J. (eds.) Animal Societies: Theories and Facts, pp. 229–237. Tokyo: Japanese Science Society Press.Google Scholar
Taborsky, M. 1994. Sneakers, satellites, and helpers: parasitic and cooperative behavior in fish reproduction. Advances in the Study of Behavior 23, 1–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taborsky, M. 1997. Bourgeois and parasitic tactics: do we need collective, functional terms for alternative reproductive behaviours?Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 41, 361–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taborsky, M. 1998. Sperm competition in fish: bourgeois males and parasitic spawning. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13, 222–227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taborsky, M. 1999. Conflict or cooperation: what determines optimal solutions to competition in fish reproduction? In Oliveira, R. F., Almada, V., and Gonçalves, E. (eds.) Behaviour and Conservation of Littoral Fishes, pp. 301–349. Lisbon: Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada.Google Scholar
Taborsky, M. 2001. The evolution of parasitic and cooperative reproductive behaviors in fishes. Journal of Heredity 92, 100–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taborsky, M. and Grantner, A. 1998. Behavioural time-energy budgets of cooperatively breeding Neolamprologus pulcher (Pisces: Cichlidae). Animal Behaviour 56, 1375–1382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taborsky, M. and Limberger, D. 1981. Helpers in fish. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 8, 143–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taborsky, M., Hert, E., Siemens, M., and Stoerig, P. 1986. Social behaviour of Lamprologus species: functions and mechanisms. Annales du Musée Royal d‘Afrique Centrale (Zoologie) 251, 7–11.Google Scholar
Taborsky, M., Hudde, B., and Wirtz, P. 1987. Reproductive behaviour and ecology of Symphodus (Crenilabrus) ocellatus, a European wrasse with four types of male behaviour. Behaviour 102, 82–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taggart, J. B., McLaren, I. S., Hay, D. W., Webb, J. H., and Youngson, A. F. 2001. Spawning success in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.): a long-term DNA profiling-based study conducted in a natural stream. Molecular Ecology 10, 1047–1060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tallamy, D. W. 2005. Egg dumping in insects. Annual Review of Entomology 50, 347–370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taru, M., Kanda, T., and Sunobe, T. 2002. Alternative mating tactics of the gobiid fish Bathygobius fuscus. Journal of Ethology 20, 9–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, E. B. 1989. Precocial male maturation in laboratory-reared populations of chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha. Canadian Journal of Zoology/Revue Canadienne de Zoologie 67, 1665–1669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, E. B. 1991. A review of local adaptation in Salmonidae, with particular reference to Pacific and Atlantic salmon. Aquaculture 98, 185–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tchernavin, V. 1938. Changes in the salmon skull. Transactions of the Zoological Society of London 24, 104–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tebbich, S., Taborsky, M., and Winkler, H. 1996. Social manipulation causes cooperation in keas. Animal Behaviour 52, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomaz, D., Beall, E., and Burke, T. 1997. Alternative reproductive tactics in Atlantic salmon: factors affecting mature parr success. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 264, 219–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, J. E. and Morgan, R. I. G. 1980. Growth rate and smolting rate of progeny of male Atlantic salmon parr (Salmo salar L.). Journal of Fish Biology 17, 451–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, J. E., Morgan, R. I. G., Talbot, L., and Miles, M. S. 1983. Inheritance of developmental rates in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Aquaculture 33, 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, J. E., Mangel, M., Metcalfe, N. B., and Huntingford, F. A. 1998. Modelling the proximate basis of salmonid life-history variation, with application to Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L. Evolutionary Ecology 12, 581–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thresher, R. E. 1979. Social behavior and ecology of two sympatric wrasses (Labridae: Halichoeres spp.) off the coast of Florida. Marine Biology 53, 161–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thresher, R. E. 1984. Reproduction in Reef Fishes. Neptune City, NJ: TFH Publications.Google Scholar
Todo, T., Ikeuchi, T., Kobayashi, T., and Nagahama, Y. 1999. Fish androgen receptor: cDNA cloning, steroid activation of transcription in transfected mammalian cells, and tissue mRNA levels. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 254, 378–383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomkins, J. L. and Simmons, L. W. 2002. Measuring relative investment: a case study of testes investment in species with alternative male reproductive tactics. Animal Behaviour 63, 1009–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Travis, J. 1981. Control of larval growth variation in a population of Pseudacris triseriata (Anura, Hylidae). Evolution 35, 423–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treasurer, J. W. 1981. Some aspects of the reproductive biology of perch, Perca fluviatilis L.: fecundity, maturation and spawning behaviour. Journal of Fish Biology 18, 729–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trivers, R. L. 1971. Evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology 46, 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trivers, R. L. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. In Campbell, B. (ed.) Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, pp. 139–179. Chicago, IL: Aldine Press.Google Scholar
Trudel, M., Tremblay, A., Schetagne, R., and Rasmussen, J. B. 2001. Why are dwarf fish so small? An energetic analysis of polymorphism in lake whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58, 394–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, B. J. and Grosse, D. J. 1980. Trophic differentiation in Ilyodon, a genus of stream-dwelling goodeid fishes: speciation versus ecological polymorphism. Evolution 34, 259–270.Google ScholarPubMed
Turner, E. and Montgomerie, R. 2002. Ovarian fluid enhances sperm movement in Arctic charr. Journal of Fish Biology 60, 1570–1579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, W. A. III 1995. The adaptive significance of colonial nesting in a coral-reef fish. Animal Behaviour 49, 949–966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uglem, I., Rosenqvist, G., and Wasslavik, H. S. 2000. Phenotypic variation between dimorphic males in corkwing wrasse. Journal of Fish Biology 57, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uglem, I., Galloway, T. F., Rosenqvist, G., and Folstad, I. 2001. Male dimorphism, sperm traits and immunology in the corkwing wrasse (Symphodus melops L.). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 50, 511–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uglem, I., Mayer, I., and Rosenqvist, G. 2002. Variation in plasma steroids and reproductive traits in dimorphic males of corkwing wrasse (Symphodus melops L.). Hormones and Behavior 41, 396–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urbach, D., Folstad, I., and Rudolfsen, G. 2005. Effects of ovarian fluid on sperm velocity in Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 57, 438–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Assem, J. 1967. Territory in the three-spined stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus L. Behaviour (Suppl. 16), 164.Google Scholar
Berghe, E. P. 1988. Piracy: a new alterantive male reproductive tactic. Nature 334, 697–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berghe, E. P., Wernerus, F., and Warner, R. R. 1989. Female choice and the mating cost of satellite males: evidence of choice for good genes?Animal Behaviour 38, 875–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandenhurk, R. and Resink, J. W. 1992. Male reproductive system as sex pheromone producer in teleost fish. Journal of Experimental Zoology 261, 204–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vehrencamp, S. L. 1983. Optimal degree of skew in cooperative societies. American Zoologist 23, 327–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verspoor, E. and Jordan, W. C. 1989. Genetic variation at the ME-2 locus in the Atlantic salmon within and between rivers: evidence for its selective maintenance. Journal of Fish Biology 35, 205–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincent, A., Ahnesjö, I., Berglund, A., and Rosenqvist, G. 1992. Pipefishes and seahorses: are they all sex role reversed?Trends in Ecology and Evolution 7, 237–241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vives, S. P. 1990. Nesting ecology and behavior of hornyhead chub Nocomis biguttatus, a keystone species in Allequash Creek, Wisconsin. American Midland Naturalist 124, 46–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vladic, T. V. and Järvi, T. 2001. Sperm quality in the alternative reproductive tactics of Atlantic salmon: the importance of the loaded raffle mechanism. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 268, 2375–2381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vladic, T. V., Afzelius, B. A., and Bronnikov, G. E. 2002. Sperm quality as reflected through morphology in salmon alternative life histories. Biology of Reproduction 66, 98–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallin, J. E. 1989. Bluehead chub (Nocomis leptocephalus) nests used by yellowfin shiners (Notropis lutipinnis). Copeia, 1077–1080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, R. R. 1982. Mating systems, sex change and sexual demography in the rainbow wrasse, Thalassoma lucasanum. Copeia, 653–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, R. R. 1984a. Deferred reproduction as a response to sexual selection in a coral reef fish: a test of the life historical consequences. Evolution 38, 148–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, R. R. 1984b. Mating behavior and hermaphroditism in coral-reef fishes. American Scientist 72, 128–136.Google Scholar
Warner, R. R. 1987. Female choice of sites versus mates in a coral reef fish, Thalassoma bifasciatum. Animal Behaviour 35, 1470–1478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, R. R. and Hoffman, S. G. 1980. Local-population size as a determinant of mating system and sexual composition in two tropical marine fishes (Thalassoma spp.). Evolution 34, 508–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, R. R. and Robertson, D. R. 1978. Sexual patterns in the labrid fishes of the Western Caribbean. 1. The wrasses (Labridae). Smithsonion Contributions to Zoology 254, 27–00.Google Scholar
Warner, R. R., Robertson, D. R., and Leigh, E. G. J. 1975. Sex change and sexual selection. Science 190, 633–638.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warner, R. R., Lejeune, P., and Berghe, E. 1995. Dynamics of female choice for parental care in a fish species where care is facultative. Behavioral Ecology 6, 73–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watters, J. V. 2005. Can the alternative male tactics “fighter” and “sneaker” be considered “coercer” and “cooperator” in coho salmon?Animal Behaviour 70, 1055–1062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedekind, C. 1992. Detailed information about parasites revealed by sexual ornamentation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 247, 169–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedekind, C. 1996. Lek-like spawning behaviour and different female mate preferences in roach (Rutilus rutilus). Behaviour 133, 681–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedekind, C., Meyer, P., Frischknecht, M., Niggli, U. A., and Pfander, H. 1998. Different carotenoids and potential information content of red coloration of male three-spined stickleback. Journal of Chemical Ecology 24, 787–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedell, N., Gage, M. J. G., and Parker, G. A. 2002. Sperm competition, male prudence and sperm-limited females. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17, 313–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wernerus, F. 1989. Etude des mécanismes sous-tendant les systémes d'appariement de quatre espéces de poissons labridés méditerranéens des genres Symphodus Rafinesque, 1810, et Thalassoma Linné 1758. Cahiers d'Ethologie appliquée 9, 117–320.Google Scholar
West-Eberhard, M. J. 1989. Phenotypic plasticity and the origins of diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 20, 249–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West-Eberhard, M. J. 2003. Developmental Plasticity and Evolution. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. S. 1989. The diversification of single gene pools by density- and frequency-dependent selection. In Otte, D. and Endler, J. A. (eds.) Speciation and Its Consequences, pp. 366–385. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Winge, O. 1937. Succession of broods in Lebistes. Nature 140, 467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wirtz, P. 1978. The behaviour of the mediterranean Tripterygion species (Pisces, Blennioidei). Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 48, 142–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wirtz, P. 1999. Mother species–father species: unidirectional hybridization in animals with female choice. Animal Behaviour 58, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wirtz, S. and Steinmann, P. 2006. Sperm characteristics in perch Perca fluviatilis L. Journal of Fish Biology 68, 1896–1902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wisenden, B. D. 1999. Alloparental care in fishes. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 9, 45–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wisenden, B. D. and Keenleyside, M. H. A. 1992. Intraspecific brood adoption in convict cichlids: mutual benefit. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 31, 263–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittenberger, J. F. 1979. The evolution of mating system in birds and mammals. In Mailer, P. and Vandenburgh, A. (eds.) Social Behavior and Communication, pp. 271–349. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Wootton, R. J. 1984. A Functional Biology of Sticklebacks. Beckenham, UK: Croom Helm.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, H. A., Wootton, R. J., and Barber, I. 2004. Interpopulation variation in early growth of threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) under laboratory conditions. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 61, 1832–1838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamagishi, S. 1988. Polyandry and helper in a cichlid fish Julidochromis marlieri. In Kawanabe, H. and Kwetuenda, M. K. (eds.) Ecological and Limnological Study on Lake Tanganyika and Its Adjacent Regions, vol. 5, pp. 21–22. Kyoto, Japan: Kyoto University Press.Google Scholar
Yamamoto, T. and Edo, K. 2002. Reproductive behaviors related to life history forms in male masu salmon, Oncorhynchus masou Breboort, in Lake Toya, Japan. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 17, 275–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yanagisawa, Y. 1985. Parental strategy of the cichlid fish Perissodus microlepis, with particular reference to intraspecific brood “farming out.”Environmental Biology of Fishes 12, 241–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yanagisawa, Y. 1986. Parental care in a monogamous mouthbreeding cichlid Xenotilapia flavipinnis in Lake Tanganyika. Japanese Journal of Ichthyology 33, 249–261.Google Scholar
Yanagisawa, Y. 1987. Social organization of a polygyneous cichlid Lamprologus furcifer in Lake Tanganyika. Japanese Journal of Ichthyology 34, 82–90.Google Scholar
Yom-Tov, Y. 1980. Intraspecific nest parasitism in birds. Biological Review 55, 93–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yom-Tov, Y. 2001. An updated list and some comments on the occurrence of intraspecific nest parasitism in birds. Ibis 143, 133–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zbinden, M., Mazzi, D., Kunzler, R., Largiader, C. R., and Bakker, T. C. M. 2003. Courting virtual rivals increase ejaculate size in sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 54, 205–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zbinden, M., Largiader, C. R., and Bakker, T. C. M. 2004. Body size of virtual rivals affects ejaculate size in sticklebacks. Behavioral Ecology 15, 137–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerer, E. J. 1982. Size related courtship strategies in the pygmy swordtail, Xiphophorus nigrensis. American Zoologist 22, 910–919.Google Scholar
Zimmerer, E. J. and Kallmann, K. D. 1989. Genetic basis for alternative reproductive tactics in the pygmy swordtail, Xiphophorus nigrensis. Evolution 43, 1298–1307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×