Daily Telegraph. 2 November 2002. ‘Tory Leader Gives MPs “Free Vote” on Gay Adoption’, 17.

The Economist. 7 November 2002. ‘Where Did It All Go Wrong?’, 59.

The Economist. 18 March 2003. ‘Blair Sticks to His Guns’, www.economist.com/agenda/displaystory.cfm?story_id=E1_TGQSQVN.

Globe and Mail. 24 November 1994. ‘Internal Party Fight over Bill Sputters. Solidarity Reigns’, A6.

Guardian. 10 November 2005. ‘Blair Defeated on Terror Bill’, www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2005/nov/09/uksecurity.terrorism.

Sydney Morning Herald. 11 May 1996. ‘Iron-bar Makes PM Blink’, 37.

Sydney Morning Herald. 22 May 1996. ‘PM Cuts Deal on Native Title’, 3.

Sydney Morning Herald. 14 June 1996. ‘Tuckey Takes an Iron-bar to “Executive Arrogance”’, 4.

Sydney Morning Herald. 11 July 1996. ‘Howard Stands Firm against Gun Crimping’, 1.

Sydney Morning Herald. 6 March 1997. ‘Howard Faces Revolt over Cut to Sugar Tariff’, 6.

Sydney Morning Herald. 20 March 1997. ‘Howard Faces Coalition Revolt over Wik Compromise Plan’, 3.

Sydney Morning Herald. 27 March 1997. ‘Dissatisfaction Mounts on the Back Benches’, 43.

Sydney Morning Herald. 23 October 1997. ‘A Show of Hands – And Then Another Liberal Rebels on Wik’, 8.

Sydney Morning Herald. 29 October 1997. ‘Libs Move to Avoid NP Split on Wik’, 3.

Sydney Morning Herald. 30 October 1997. ‘Blow to Coalition as Renegades Cross Floor over Wik’, 3.

Sydney Morning Herald. 2 December 1997. ‘Sunset Clause beyond Pale, Says Harradine’, 4.

Sydney Morning Herald. 18 June 1998. ‘Moderates Push for Wik Compromise’, 7.

Sydney Morning Herald. 4 July 1998. ‘The Dust Settles: The Painful Journey to a Deal’, 29.

The Times. 5 November 2002. ‘Challenge to Rebels Was the Mark of a Vulnerable Leader, Not a Strong One’.

Toronto Star. 6 February 1995. ‘Liberals Face Rough Ride in House. Explosive Issues Top Agenda as MPs Return to Ottawa’, A9.

Vancouver Sun. 13 June 1995. ‘Liberals Expected to Pass 3 Thorny Bills within a Week: “The Longer They Let Things Drag On the More Difficult It Would Be to Control their Backbenchers”’, A7.

Winnipeg Free Press. 15 June 1995. ‘Iftody to Rebel Again’, A1.

Clarke, H., Sanders, D., Stewart, M., and Whiteley, P.. British General Election Study, 2001; Cross-Section Survey [computer file]. Colchester, Essex: UK Data Archive [distributor], March 2003. SN: 4619.Google Scholar

Clarke, H., Sanders, D., Stewart, M., and Whiteley, P.. British Election Study, 2005: Internet Rolling Campaign Panel Data and British Parliamentary Constituency Database [computer file]. Colchester, Essex: UK Data Archive [distributor], November 2006. SN: 5496.Google Scholar

Erickson, Lynda. 1993. Canadian Candidate Study, 1993. Burnaby, BC: Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar

Heath, A., Jowell, R., and Curtice, J. K.. British General Election Study, 1983; Cross-Section Survey [computer file]. Colchester, Essex: UK Data Archive [distributor], 1983. SN: 2005.Google Scholar

Heath, A., Jowell, R., and Curtice, J. K.. British General Election Study, 1987; Cross-Section Survey, 2nd edn [computer file]. Colchester, Essex: UK Data Archive [distributor], April 1993. SN: 2568.Google Scholar

Heath, A., Jowell, R., and Curtice, J. K.. British Election Panel Study, 1992–1997 [computer file]. Colchester, Essex: UK Data Archive [distributor], July 1998. SN: 3888.Google Scholar

Heath, Anthony F., Jowell, Roger M., Curtice, John K., and Norris, Pippa. 1999. British General Election Cross-Section Survey, 1997 [computer file]. ICPSR version (ICPSR 2615). London: Social and Community Planning Research [producer], 1998. Colchester, Essex: ESRC Data Archive/Ann Arbor, MI: Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributors], 1999.Google Scholar

Jones, R., McAllister, I., and Gow, D. G.. 1996. Australian Candidate Study, 1996 (SSDA Study No. 944). Canberra: Social Science Data Archives, The Australian National University.Google Scholar

McAllister, I., Jones, R.Denemark, D., and Gow, D. G.. 1994. Australian Candidate Study, 1993 (SSDA Study No. 764). Canberra: Social Science Data Archives, The Australian National University.Google Scholar

Norris, Pippa and Lovenduski, Joni. 1992. British Candidate Study, 1992. Available online at: http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~pnorris/Data/data.htm.

Norris, Pippa and Lovenduski, Joni. 1997. British Representation Study, 1997. Available online at: http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~pnorris/Data/data.htm.

Norton, Philip and Cowley, Philip. 1999. Dissension in the House of Commons 1992–1997 Codebook. UK Data Archive. SN: 4055Google Scholar

Tomz, Michael, Wittenberg, Jason, and King, Gary. 2001. ‘CLARIFY: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results’, version 2.0. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, 1 June, http://gking.harvard.edu.Google Scholar

Vowles, Jack, Aimer, Peter, Catt, Helena, Miller, Raymond, and Lamare, Jim. 1994. 1992 New Zealand Election Survey [computer file]. Auckland: Department of Political Science, University of Auckland. Available online at www.nzes.org/exec/show/1993.Google Scholar

Parliamentary Debates of the Commonwealth of Australia (House of Representatives). Various volumes. Canberra: The House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Australia.

Parliamentary Debates of the Commonwealth of Australia (Senate). Various volumes. Canberra: The Senate of the Commonwealth of Australia.

Annotated Standing Orders of the House of Commons. 1989. Ottawa: The House of Commons of Canada.

Parliamentary Debates of the House of Commons of Canada. Ottawa: Queen's Printer. Available online at www.parl.gc.ca/cgi-bin/hansard/e_hansard_master.pl.

Parliamentary Debates (Hansard). Various Volumes. Wellington, NZ: House of Representatives.

Standing Orders of the House of Representatives. 2005. Wellington, NZ: House of Representatives.

Parliamentary Debates of the House of Commons (Hansard). Sixth series. Various volumes. London: HMSO.

Aldrich, John H. 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alt, James E. 1984. ‘Dealignment and the Dynamics of Partisanship in Britain’, in Dalton, Russell, Flanagan, Scott, and Beck, Paul Allen (eds.), Electoral Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Princeton University Press, 298–329.Google Scholar

Anagnoson, J. Theodore. 1987. ‘Does Constituency Work Have an Electoral Impact? The Case of New Zealand MPs’, Political Science, 39: 105–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Asher, Herbert B. 1973. ‘The Learning of Legislative Norms’, American Political Science Review, 67: 499–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aylott, Nicholas. 2002. ‘Let's Discuss This Later: Party Responses to Euro-Division in Scandinavia’, Party Politics, 8: 441–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benedetto, Giacomo and Hix, Simon. 2007. ‘The Rejected, Dejected, and the Ejected: Explaining Government Rebels in the 2001–05 British House of Commons’, Comparative Political Studies, 40: 755–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bean, Clive. 1990. ‘The Personal Vote in Australian Elections’, Political Studies, 38: 253–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beck, Nathaniel and Katz, Jonathan N.. 1995. ‘What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data’, American Political Science Review, 89: 634–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beck, Nathaniel and Katz, Jonathan N.. 2001. ‘Throwing Out the Baby with the Bathwater: A Comment on Green, Yoon, and Kim’, International Organizations, 55: 487–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beer, Samuel H. 1965. Modern British Politics. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar

Berkeley, Humphrey. 1972. Crossing the Floor. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Bowler, Shaun. 2000. ‘Parties in Legislatures: Two Competing Explanations’, in Dalton, Russell and Wattenberg, Martin (eds.), Parties without Partisans. Oxford University Press, 157–79.Google Scholar

Bown, Francis. 1990. ‘The Defeat of the Shops Bill, 1986’, in Rush, Michael (ed.), Parliament and Pressure Politics. Oxford University Press, 213–33.Google Scholar

Brambor, Thomas, Clark, William R. and Golder, Matthew. 2005. ‘Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses’, Political Analysis, 14: 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buck, Philip. 1963. ‘The Early Start toward Cabinet Office, 1918–55’, Western Political Quarterly, 16: 624–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butler, David and Butler, Gareth. 1994. British Political Facts, 1900–1994. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butler, David and Kavanagh, Denis. 1997. The British General Election of 1997. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butler, David and E. Stokes, Donald. 1969. Political Change in Britain: Forces Shaping Electoral Choice. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Butt, Ronald. 1967. The Power of Parliament. London: Constable.Google Scholar

Cain, Bruce E., Ferejohn, John A., and Fiorina, Morris P.. 1987. The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E. 1960. The American Voter. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Carty, R. Kenneth. 2002. ‘Canada's 19th Century Cadre Parties at the Millennium’, in Webb, Paul, Farrell, David, and Holliday, Ian (eds.), Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford University Press, 345–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, Harold D., Ho, Karl, and Stewart, Marianne C.. 2000. ‘Major's Lesser (Not Minor) Effects: Prime Ministerial Approval and Governing Party Support in Britain Since 1979’, Electoral Studies, 18: 255–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, Harold D., Sanders, David, Stewart, Marianne C., and Whiteley, Paul F.. 2004. Political Choice in Britain. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Converse, Philip. 1964. ‘The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics’, in Apter, David E. (ed.), Ideology and Discontent. New York: The Free Press, 206–61.Google Scholar

Cook, Robin. 2003. The Point of Departure. London: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Cowley, Philip. 1999. ‘Rebels and Rebellions: Conservative MPs in the 1992 Parliament’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 1: 84–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cowley, Philip. 2002. Revolts and Rebellions: Parliamentary Voting under Blair. London: Politico's.Google Scholar

Cowley, Philip. 2005. The Rebels: How Blair Mislaid His Majority. London: Politico's.Google Scholar

Cowley, Philip and Norton, Philip. 1996. ‘Are Conservative MPs Revolting?’, Research Paper in Legislative Studies, 2/96. Hull: Centre for Legislative Studies, University of Hull.Google Scholar

Cowley, Philip and Norton, Philip, with Stuart, Mark and Bailey, Matthew. 1996. ‘Blair's Bastards: Discontent within the Parliamentary Labour Party’, Research Paper in Legislative Studies, 1/96. Hull: Centre for Legislative Studies, University of Hull.Google Scholar

Cowley, Philip and Stuart, Mark. 2004. ‘Still Causing Trouble: The Conservative Parliamentary Party’, Political Quarterly 75: 356–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cowley, Philip and Stuart, Mark. 2005. ‘Government Defeated Twice on Terrorism Bill’, briefing paper. Available online at www.revolts.co.uk/Blair%20defeated%20twice%20on%20Terrorism%20Bill.pdf.

Cox, Gary W. 1987. The Efficient Secret: The Cabinet and the Development of Parties in Victorian England. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, Gary W. 1999. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cox, Gary W. 2000. ‘On the Effects of Legislative Rules’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 25: 169–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, Gary W. and McCubbins, Matthew. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the US House of Representatives. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crewe, Ivor and King, Anthony. 1994. ‘Did Major Win? Did Kinnock Lose? Leadership Effects in the 1992 Election’, in Heath, Anthony, Jowell, Roger, and Curtice, John (eds.), Labour's Last Chance? The 1992 Election and Beyond. Aldershot: Dartmouth, 125–48.Google Scholar

Crewe, Ivor, Sarlvik, Bo, and Alt, James E. 1977. ‘Partisan Dealignment in Britain, 1964–1974’, British Journal of Political Science, 7: 129–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crowe, Edward W. 1983. ‘Consensus and Structure in Legislative Norms: Party Discipline in the House of Commons’, Journal of Politics, 45: 487–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crowe, Edward W. 1986. ‘The Web of Authority: Party Loyalty and Social Control in the British House of Commons’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 11: 161–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dalton, Russell J. 1993. Politics in Germany. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar

Dalton, Russell J. 2000. ‘The Decline of Party Identification’, in Dalton, Russell J. and Wattenberg, Martin P. (eds.), Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford University Press, 19–36.Google Scholar

Dalton, Russell J., Flanagan, Scott C., and Beck, Paul Allen. 1984. Electoral Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies: Realignment or Dealignment. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Denemark, David. 2000. ‘Partisan Pork Barrel in Parliamentary Systems: Australian Constituency-level Grants’, Journal of Politics, 62: 896–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diermeier, Daniel and Feddersen, Timothy J.. 1998. ‘Cohesion in Legislatures and the Vote of Confidence Procedure’, American Political Science Review, 92: 611–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Docherty, David. 1997. Mr. Smith Goes to Ottawa: Life in the House of Commons. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar

Döring, Herbert (ed.). 1995. Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe. New York: St. Martin's Press.

Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper-Row.Google Scholar

Duverger, Maurice. 1962. Political Parties, trans. Barbara, and North, Robert. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Epstein, David, Brady, David, Kawato, Sadafumi, and O'Halloran, Sharyn. 1997. ‘A Comparative Approach to Legislative Organization: Careerism and Seniority in the United States and Japan’, American Journal of Political Science, 41: 965–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erickson, Lynda. 1997. ‘Might More Women Make a Difference? Gender, Party and Ideology among Parliamentary Candidates’, Canadian Journal of Political Science, 30: 663–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fenno, Richard F. Jr. 1973. Congressmen in Committees. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Ferejohn, John A. and Gaines, Brian. 1991. ‘The Personal Vote in Canada’, in Bakvis, Herman (ed.), Representation, Integration, and Political Parties in Canada. Toronto: Dundurn Press, 275–302.Google Scholar

Franklin, Mark, Baxter, Alison, and Jordan, Margaret. 1986. ‘Who Were the Rebels? Dissent in the House of Commons, 1970–1974’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 11: 143–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franks, C. E. S. 1987. The Parliament of Canada. University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedrich, Robert J. 1982. ‘In Defense of Multiplicative Terms in Multiple Regression Equations’, American Political Science Review, 26: 797–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gabel, Matthew J. and Huber, John. 2000. ‘Putting Parties in Their Place: Inferring Party Left–Right Ideological Positions from Party Manifestos Data’, American Journal of Political Science, 44: 94–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaines, Brian J. and Garrett, Geoffrey. 1993. ‘The Calculus of Dissent: Party Discipline in the British Labour Government, 1974–79’, Political Behavior, 15: 113–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Golder, Matt. 2003. ‘Electoral Institutions, Unemployment and Extreme Right Parties: A Correction’, British Journal of Political Science, 33: 525–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Green, Donald P., Kim, Soo Yeon, and Yoon, David H.. 2001. ‘Dirty Pool’, International Organization, 55: 441–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hager, Gregory and Talbert, Jeffery C.. 2000. ‘Look for the Party Label: Party Influences on Voting in the U.S. House’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 15: 75–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heath, Anthony F., Jowell, Roger M., and Curtice, John K.. 1985. How Britain Votes. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar

Heath, Anthony F., Jowell, Roger M., and Curtice, John K.. 2001. The Rise of New Labour: Party Policies and Voter Choices. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Valerie, Heitshusen, Young, Garry, and Wood, David M.. 2005. ‘Electoral Context and MP Constituency Focus in Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom’, American Journal of Political Science, 49: 32–45.Google Scholar

Hine, David. 1993. Governing Italy: The Politics of Bargained Pluralism. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hirschman, Albert O. 1970. Exit, Voice, Loyalty: Response to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Hixon, William and Wicks, Aaron E.. 2000. ‘Measuring Congressional Support for the President: Evaluating the NOMINATE Scores’, Presidential Studies Quarterly, 30: 186–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hobby, M. 1987. ‘The Crack of the Whips, Party Cohesion and Institutional Consensus in the New Zealand Parliament, 1936–85’, unpublished MA thesis, University of Canterbury, Christchurch.Google Scholar

Huber, John D. 1996a. Rationalizing Parliament: Legislative Institutions and Party Politics in France. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huber, John D. 1996b. ‘The Vote of Confidence in Parliamentary Democracies’, American Political Science Review, 90: 269–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huber, John D. and Inglehart, Ronald. 1995. ‘Expert Interpretations of Party Space and Party Locations in 42 Societies’, Party Politics, 1: 73–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Irvine, W. P. 1982. ‘Does the Candidate Make a Difference? The Macro-politics and Micro-politics of Getting Elected’, Canadian Journal of Political Science, 15: 755–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, John and Kingdon, John W.. 1992. ‘Ideology, Interest Group Scores, and Legislative Votes’, American Journal of Political Science, 36: 805–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, K. 1987. The Dilemma of Parliament. Auckland: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Jackson, R. 1968. Rebels and Whips: An Analysis of Dissension, Discipline, and Cohesion in British Political Parties. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar

Jaensch, Dean. 1992. The Politics of Australia. Melbourne: Macmillan Australia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jensen, Torben K. 2000. ‘Party Cohesion’, in Esaiasson, Peter and Heider, Knut (eds.), Beyond Westminster and Congress: The Nordic Experience. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 210–36.Google Scholar

Kam, Christopher. 2002. ‘Parliaments, Parties, and MPs: A Comparative Perspective on Backbench Dissent, Party Discipline, and Intra-party Politics’, unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Rochester.Google Scholar

Kam, Christopher and Indridason, Indridi. 2005. ‘The Timing of Cabinet Reshuffles in Five Westminster Parliamentary Systems’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 30: 327–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Katz, Richard S. 2001. ‘The Problem of Candidate Selection’, Party Politics, 7: 277–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, Anthony. 1981. ‘The Rise of the Career Politician in Britain – And Its Consequences’, British Journal of Political Science, 11: 249–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, Gary. 1988. ‘Statistical Models for Political Science Event Counts: Bias in Conventional Procedures and Evidence for the Exponential Poisson Regression Model’, American Journal of Political Science, 32: 838–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirkpatrick, Samuel A. and McLemore, Lelan. 1977. ‘Perceptual and Affective Components of Legislative Norms: A Social-Psychological Analysis of Congruity’, Journal of Politics, 39: 685–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kornberg, Alan. 1967. Canadian Legislative Behaviour: A Study of the 25th Parliament. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith. 1993. ‘Where's the Party?’, British Journal of Political Science, 23: 235–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith. 1999. ‘Paradoxes of Parties in Congress’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 14: 31–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laakso, M. and Taagepera, R.. 1979. ‘“Effective” Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe’, Comparative Political Studies, 23: 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laver, Michael. 1999. ‘Divided Parties, Divided Government’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 14: 5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laver, Michael and Hunt, Ben. 1992. Policy and Party Competition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Laver, Michael and Schofield, Norman. 1990. Multiparty Government: The Politics of Coalition in Western Europe. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Laws, Michael. 1998. The Demon Profession. Auckland: HarperCollins.Google Scholar

Lijphart, Arend. 1975. ‘The Comparable-Cases Strategy in Comparative Research’, Comparative Political Studies, 8: 158–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Londregan, John. 1999. ‘Estimating Legislators’ Ideal Points’, Political Analysis, 8: 38–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lucy, Richard. 1985. The Australian Form of Government. Melbourne: Macmillan.Google Scholar

McAllister, Ian. 1992. ‘Australia: Changing Social Structure, Stable Politics’, in Franklin, Mark, Mackie, Thomas T., and Valen, Henry (eds.), Electoral Change: Responses to Evolving Social and Attitudinal Structures in Fifteen Countries. Cambridge University Press, 61–82.Google Scholar

McAllister, Ian. 2006. ‘Political Parties in Australia: Party Stability in a Utilitarian Society’, in Webb, Paul, Farrell, David, and Holliday, Ian (eds.), Political Parties at the Millennium: Adaptation and Decline in Democratic Societies. Oxford University Press, 379–408.Google Scholar

McAllister, Ian and T. Studlar, Donley. 2000. ‘Conservative Euroscepticism and the Referendum Party in the 1997 British General Election’, Party Politics, 6: 359–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacDonald, Stuart Elaine. 1987. ‘Political Ambition and Attainment: A Dynamic Analysis of Parliamentary Careers’, unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Michigan.

McSmith, Andy. 1996. Faces of Labour: The Inside Story. New York: Verso.Google Scholar

Major, John. 1999. John Major: The Autobiography. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar

Matland, Richard E. and Studlar, Donley T.. 2004. ‘Determinants of Legislative Turnover: A Cross-National Analysis’, British Journal of Political Science, 34: 87–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meng, Xiao-Li. 1994. ‘Multiple Imputation Inferences with Uncongenial Sources of Input’, Statistical Science, 9: 538–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mershon, Carol and Heller, William. 2005. ‘Party Switching in the Italian Chamber of Deputies, 1996–2001’, Journal of Politics, 67: 536–59.Google Scholar

Mezey, Michael L. 1993. ‘Legislatures: Individual Purpose and Institutional Performance’, in Finifter, Ada (ed.), The State of the Discipline II. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar

Morgenstern, Scott. 2004. Patterns of Legislative Politics: Roll Call Voting in the United States and Latin America's Southern Cone. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mughan, Anthony. 1990. ‘Midterm Popularity and Governing Party Dissension in the House of Commons, 1959–79’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 15: 341–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anthony, Mughan, Box-Steffensmeier, Janet, and Scully, Roger. 1997. ‘Mapping Legislative Socialisation’, European Journal of Political Research, 32: 93–106.Google Scholar

Müller, Wolfgang C. and Strøm, Kaare. 1999. ‘Political Parties and Hard Choices’, in Müller, Wolfgang C. and Strøm, Kaare (eds.), Policy, Office, or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Choices. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Neal, Nevitte, Blais, André, Gidengil, Elisabeth, and Nadeau, Richard. 2000. Unsteady State: The 1997 Canadian Federal Election. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Norris, Pippa and Lovenduski, Joni. 1994. Political Recruitment: Gender, Race and Class in the British Parliament. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pippa, Norris, Vallance, Elizabeth, and Lovenduski, Joni. 1992. ‘Do Candidates Make a Difference? Gender, Race, Ideology and Incumbency’, Parliamentary Affairs, 45: 497–517.Google Scholar

Norton, Philip. 1975. Dissension in the House of Commons: Intra-Party Dissent in the House of Commons Division Lobbies, 1945–1974. London: MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norton, Philip. 1978. Conservative Dissidents. London: Temple Smith.Google Scholar

Norton, Philip. 1980. Dissension in the House of Commons, 1974–1979. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Norton, Philip. 1981. The Commons in Perspective. New York: Longman.Google Scholar

Norton, Philip. 1985. ‘Behavioural Changes. Backbench Independence in the 1980s’, in Norton, Philip (ed.), Parliament in the 1980s. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Norton, Philip. 1987. ‘Dissent in the British House of Commons: Rejoinder to Franklin, Baxter, Jordan’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 12: 143–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norton, Philip. 2000. ‘The Individual Member in the British House of Commons: Facing Both Ways and Marching Forward’, in Longley, Lawrence D. and Hazan, Reuven Y. (eds.), The Uneasy Relationships between Parliamentary Members and Leaders. London: Frank Cass, 53–74.Google Scholar

Norton, Philip and Wood, David M.. 1993. Back from Westminster: British Members of Parliament and Their Constituents. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.Google Scholar

Ozbudun, Ergun. 1970. Party Cohesion in Western Democracies: A Causal Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Books.Google Scholar

Palmer, Matthew S. R. 1995. ‘Toward an Economics of Comparative Political Organization: Examining Ministerial Responsibility’, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 11: 164–88.Google Scholar

Paltzelt, W. 2000. ‘What Can an Individual MP Do in German Parliamentary Politics?’, in Longley, L. and Hazan, R. (eds.), The Uneasy Relationship between Parliamentary Members and Leaders. London: Frank Cass, 23–52.Google Scholar

Patterson, Samuel. 1989. ‘Understanding the British Parliament’, Political Studies, 37: 449–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charles, Pattie, Fieldhouse, Edward, and Johnston, R. J.. 1994. ‘The Price of Conscience: The Electoral Correlates and Consequences of Free Votes and Rebellions in the British House of Commons, 1987–92’, British Journal of Political Science, 24: 359–80.Google Scholar

Piper, J. Richard. 1991. ‘British Backbench Rebellion and Government Appointments, 1945–87’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 16: 219–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poole, Keith T. and Rosenthal, Howard. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Popkin, Samuel L. 1994. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Powell, G. Bingham. 2000. Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Powell, G. Bingham and Whitten, Guy D.. 1993. ‘A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context’, American Journal of Political Science, 37: 391–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Przeworski, Adam and Teune, Henry. 1970. The Logic of Comparative Inquiry. Malabar, FL: R. E. Krieger.Google Scholar

Rasch, Bjørn Erik. 2000. ‘Parliamentary Floor Voting Procedures and Agenda Setting in Europe’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 25: 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rice, Stuart A. 1925. ‘The Behavior of Legislative Groups’, Political Science Quarterly, 40: 60–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubin, Donald B. 1977. ‘Formalizing Subjective Notions about the Effect of Nonrespondents in Sample Surveys’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 72: 538–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubin, Donald B. 1987. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York: Wiley and Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubin, Donald B. 1996. ‘Multiple Imputation after 18+ Years’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91: 473–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saalfeld, Thomas. 1986. ‘On Dogs and Whips: Recorded Votes’, in International Centre for Parliamentary Documentation, Parliaments of the World: A Comparative Reference Compendium. New York: Facts on File.Google Scholar

Sartori, Giovanni. 1991. ‘Comparing and Miscomparing’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 3: 243–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sayers, Anthony M. 1999. Parties, Candidates, and Constituency Campaigns in Canadian Elections. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar

Schafer, J. L. 1997. Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data. London: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schlesinger, Joseph A. 1961. Ambition and Politics. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar

Schwarz, John E. 1980. ‘Exploring a New Role in Policy Making: The British House of Commons in the 1970s’, American Political Science Review, 74: 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Searing, Donald D. 1994. Westminster's World: Understanding Political Roles. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Searing, Donald D. and Game, Chris. 1977. ‘Horses for Courses: The Recruitment of Whips in the British House of Commons’, British Journal of Political Science, 7: 361–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Seldon, Anthony. 2004. Blair. London: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Silk, Paul and Walters, Rhodri. 1987. How Parliament Works. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar

Snyder, James M. and Groseclose, Tim. 2000. ‘Estimating Party Influence in Congressional Roll-Call Voting’, American Journal of Political Science, 44: 193–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sowemimo, Matthew. 1996. ‘The Conservative Party and European Integration, 1988–95’, Party Politics, 2: 77–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spirling, Arthur and McLean, Ian. 2007. ‘UK OC OK? Interpreting Optimal Classification Scores for the UK House of Commons’, Political Analysis, 15: 85–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stanbury, William T. 1993. ‘Financing Federal Politics in Canada in an Era of Reform’, in Gunlicks, Arthur B. (ed.), Campaign and Party Finance in North America and Western Europe. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 68–120.Google Scholar

Stimson, James A. 1985. ‘Regression in Space and Time: A Statistical Essay’, American Journal of Political Science, 29: 914–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strøm, Kaare. 1986. ‘Deferred Gratification and Minority Governments in Scandinavia’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 10: 583–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thies, Michael F. 2000. ‘On the Primacy of Party in Government: Why Legislative Parties Can Survive Party Decline in the Electorate’, in Dalton, Russell J. and Wattenberg, Martin P. (eds.), Parties without Partisans. New York: Oxford University Press, 238–57.Google Scholar

Tocqueville, Alexis. 1848/1965. Democracy in America. Garden City, New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Tsebelis, George. 2002. Veto Players. How Political Institutions Work. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vandoren, Peter M. 1990. ‘Can We Learn the Causes of Congressional Decisions from Roll-Call Data?’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 15: 311–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vowles, Jack and Aimer, Peter. 1992. The Voters’ Vengeance: The 1990 Election in New Zealand and the Fate of the Fourth Labour Government. Auckland University Press.Google Scholar

Ward, Norman. 1987. Dawson's The Government of Canada, 6th edn. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Wearing, Joseph. 1998. ‘Guns, Gays, and Gadflies: Party Dissent in the House of Commons under Mulroney and Chrétien’, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association, University of Ottawa, 31 May–2 June 1998.

Webb, Paul D. 1994. ‘Centralized Parties and Decentralized Selection’, in Katz, Richard S. and Mair, Peter (eds.), How Parties Organize: Change and Adaptation in Party Organizations in Western Democracies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Willson, F. M. G. 1959. ‘The Routes of Entry of New Members of the British Cabinet 1868–1958’, Political Studies, 7: 222–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Willson, F. M. G. 1970. ‘Entry to the Cabinet, 1959–68’, Political Studies, 18: 236–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar